Act, 4 March 1701, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 1701

D1701/3/51

Act

Aliment To Helen Aytoun

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of Her2 Majesties privie Councill The petition of Helen Aytoun Relict of the Deceist Doctor Alexander Balfour of Colluthie now spouse to Mr David Bechun Shewing That where the petitioner haveing bein provyded by the said Doctor Alexander Balfour to ane Lyfrent of ten Chalders of victwall furth of the Lands of Colluthie and Lileathen besyds the soume of three thousand merks to be at her Disposeall It was her Fate and unhapienes (though she was ashamed to say and nothing but extremity of Miserie could have induced her to repent it) to Mary the said Mr David Bechun (being at that tyme in such Circumstances as she might have lived very comfortablie) Who by his prodigall and extravagant way of Liveing Did not only uplift and squander away the forsaid soume of three thousand merks But was also therby reduced to such dificulties and straits as rendered him obnoxious to personall distresses and dilligence from which he could not after Exstricat himself and the petitioner was Forced from the tendernes and affection she had for him and to prevent his takeing desperat Courses, Notwithout the Melancholy prospect of the condition and Circumstances she was then brought to Raither to denude her self of a considerable pairt of Her Joynture Then suffer him to be harrassed by the persutes of His Creditors and Did actually renounce her Lyfrent right of the saids Lands of Colluchie In favours of the Laird of Barburne Fiar therof being persuaded he would so apply the pryce as to prevent our fwrder trouble and hopeing therby to Reclaim him But so litle effect had this her Conjugall tendernes and affection towards him and so farr was he from any just returns of gratitude That he hath now it seems altogither deserted the petitioner without any other Fund for her subsistance But the Charity of Freinds haveing no access to the small remander of her Lyfrent which is now reduced to ane hundreth pound scots and Fourtein bolls of oats For the uplifting wherof he hath left ane Factory with Mr David Nicolson a man every way quallified for such unfavourable Managements and he hath accordingly uplifted the same ever since the said Mr Davids departure from this Kingdome about tuo years agoe and although the petitioners Circumstances were sufficiently unhappy whyll he lived with her They are now much worse being redacted to such a Condition of Miserie and povertie as she was ashamed to represent Yea so was the rigor and severitie of the said Mr David his Factor towards the petitioner presumeing it seems wpon her temper and aversion to such harsh representations Especially against her Husband That when any thing is demanded from him he treats the petitioner only with contempt and scorne and it being their Lordships constant custom and practise to vindicat such as are in the petitioners circumstances from such barbarous useage and treatment by allowing them compitent and suteable aliments where there is any Fond and seing the said Mr David hath dilapidat the most pairt of the petitioners Lyfrent so that the remainder could only aliment her very narouly Being now throw age sicknes and Infirmity utterly incapable of doeing any thing for herself Therfore Craveing to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears The Lords of Her Majesties privie Councill haveing considered the above petition given in to them by the said Helen Aytoun They heirby Decerne and ordain […] Watson relict of the deceist John Balfour in Lileathen to make payment and satisfaction to the petitioner of the soume of ane hundreth pound scots and Fourtein bolls of oats for the Cropt and year of God Jai vijc years and of the lyke soume of ane hundreth pound scots and lyke number of Fourtein bolls of oats for the cropt and year of God Jai vijc and one years instant And that betuixt the Feasts and termes of Whitsonday and Mertimes nixt to come and of the Lyke soume and Lyke number of bolls of oats yearly in all tyme comeing Dureing the said Helen Aytoun her lyftyme and that for her subsistance and aliment The termes of payment of the samen being alwayes first come and bygone and ordains Letters of Horning and all other execution necessary under the signet of Councill to be direct heirupon in forme as effeirs

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 1701

D1701/3/51

Act

Aliment To Helen Aytoun

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of Her2 Majesties privie Councill The petition of Helen Aytoun Relict of the Deceist Doctor Alexander Balfour of Colluthie now spouse to Mr David Bechun Shewing That where the petitioner haveing bein provyded by the said Doctor Alexander Balfour to ane Lyfrent of ten Chalders of victwall furth of the Lands of Colluthie and Lileathen besyds the soume of three thousand merks to be at her Disposeall It was her Fate and unhapienes (though she was ashamed to say and nothing but extremity of Miserie could have induced her to repent it) to Mary the said Mr David Bechun (being at that tyme in such Circumstances as she might have lived very comfortablie) Who by his prodigall and extravagant way of Liveing Did not only uplift and squander away the forsaid soume of three thousand merks But was also therby reduced to such dificulties and straits as rendered him obnoxious to personall distresses and dilligence from which he could not after Exstricat himself and the petitioner was Forced from the tendernes and affection she had for him and to prevent his takeing desperat Courses, Notwithout the Melancholy prospect of the condition and Circumstances she was then brought to Raither to denude her self of a considerable pairt of Her Joynture Then suffer him to be harrassed by the persutes of His Creditors and Did actually renounce her Lyfrent right of the saids Lands of Colluchie In favours of the Laird of Barburne Fiar therof being persuaded he would so apply the pryce as to prevent our fwrder trouble and hopeing therby to Reclaim him But so litle effect had this her Conjugall tendernes and affection towards him and so farr was he from any just returns of gratitude That he hath now it seems altogither deserted the petitioner without any other Fund for her subsistance But the Charity of Freinds haveing no access to the small remander of her Lyfrent which is now reduced to ane hundreth pound scots and Fourtein bolls of oats For the uplifting wherof he hath left ane Factory with Mr David Nicolson a man every way quallified for such unfavourable Managements and he hath accordingly uplifted the same ever since the said Mr Davids departure from this Kingdome about tuo years agoe and although the petitioners Circumstances were sufficiently unhappy whyll he lived with her They are now much worse being redacted to such a Condition of Miserie and povertie as she was ashamed to represent Yea so was the rigor and severitie of the said Mr David his Factor towards the petitioner presumeing it seems wpon her temper and aversion to such harsh representations Especially against her Husband That when any thing is demanded from him he treats the petitioner only with contempt and scorne and it being their Lordships constant custom and practise to vindicat such as are in the petitioners circumstances from such barbarous useage and treatment by allowing them compitent and suteable aliments where there is any Fond and seing the said Mr David hath dilapidat the most pairt of the petitioners Lyfrent so that the remainder could only aliment her very narouly Being now throw age sicknes and Infirmity utterly incapable of doeing any thing for herself Therfore Craveing to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears The Lords of Her Majesties privie Councill haveing considered the above petition given in to them by the said Helen Aytoun They heirby Decerne and ordain […] Watson relict of the deceist John Balfour in Lileathen to make payment and satisfaction to the petitioner of the soume of ane hundreth pound scots and Fourtein bolls of oats for the Cropt and year of God Jai vijc years and of the lyke soume of ane hundreth pound scots and lyke number of Fourtein bolls of oats for the cropt and year of God Jai vijc and one years instant And that betuixt the Feasts and termes of Whitsonday and Mertimes nixt to come and of the Lyke soume and Lyke number of bolls of oats yearly in all tyme comeing Dureing the said Helen Aytoun her lyftyme and that for her subsistance and aliment The termes of payment of the samen being alwayes first come and bygone and ordains Letters of Horning and all other execution necessary under the signet of Councill to be direct heirupon in forme as effeirs

1. NRS, PC2/28, 44r-45r.

2. Sic.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 44r-45r.

2. Sic.

Act, 4 March 1701, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 1701

D1701/3/41

Act

Repryve Peter and Donald Brouns

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of His Majesties privie Councill By Peter and Donald Brouns prisoners in the Tolbooth of Banff Shewing That where wpon a verdict of Assyse already represented and considered by the saids Lords and wherin nothing was proven against the petitioners saveing their being held and repute vagabound Egyptians They are now by the sherriff deput of Bamph wpon the act of parliament Jaj vjc and nyn Intituled act anent the Egyptians Condemned to be execute to death the second of Apryll nixt Which their Lordships knew to be a great hardship and serveritie In respect that both by the tenor of that act of parliament and practique of the Court of Justiciary theron some farder cryme of robbing and stealling hath comonly bein found requisit togither with the said held and repute to Inferr the said pain of Death and seing the forsaid day is short and no doubt perremptorie and that a longer tyme may be requisite aither for their releiff or due preparation Therfore Craveing to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition Bears The Lords of His Majesties privie Councill Haveing considered the above petition given in to them by the saids Peter and Donald Broun prisoners in the Tolbooth of Bamff They heirby Repryve the saids petitioners from the sentence of Death pronounced against them by the sherriff deput of Banff untill the second wednesday of June nixt to come and ordains the said sentence of Death to be put to execution against them wpon the said second wedensday of June nixt to come unles His Majestie or the Councill gives order to the contrary sic subscribitur Marchmont Cancellar Argyll Mar Leven James Stewart CCampbell JHope FMontgomrie Ludovick Grant Pattrick Johnstoun

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 1701

D1701/3/41

Act

Repryve Peter and Donald Brouns

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of His Majesties privie Councill By Peter and Donald Brouns prisoners in the Tolbooth of Banff Shewing That where wpon a verdict of Assyse already represented and considered by the saids Lords and wherin nothing was proven against the petitioners saveing their being held and repute vagabound Egyptians They are now by the sherriff deput of Bamph wpon the act of parliament Jaj vjc and nyn Intituled act anent the Egyptians Condemned to be execute to death the second of Apryll nixt Which their Lordships knew to be a great hardship and serveritie In respect that both by the tenor of that act of parliament and practique of the Court of Justiciary theron some farder cryme of robbing and stealling hath comonly bein found requisit togither with the said held and repute to Inferr the said pain of Death and seing the forsaid day is short and no doubt perremptorie and that a longer tyme may be requisite aither for their releiff or due preparation Therfore Craveing to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition Bears The Lords of His Majesties privie Councill Haveing considered the above petition given in to them by the saids Peter and Donald Broun prisoners in the Tolbooth of Bamff They heirby Repryve the saids petitioners from the sentence of Death pronounced against them by the sherriff deput of Banff untill the second wednesday of June nixt to come and ordains the said sentence of Death to be put to execution against them wpon the said second wedensday of June nixt to come unles His Majestie or the Councill gives order to the contrary sic subscribitur Marchmont Cancellar Argyll Mar Leven James Stewart CCampbell JHope FMontgomrie Ludovick Grant Pattrick Johnstoun

1. NRS, PC2/28, 43v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 43v.

Act, 4 March 1701, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 1701

D1701/3/31

Act

Act Livetennent Collonell Erskine anent the Chartor Chest of Kincardine

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of His Majesties privie Councill By Livetennent Collonell John Erskine Governour of Dumbarton Castle Shewing That where wpon application made to their Lordships by the Deceist Henry Lord Cardose The Chartor Chist of Kincardine and wrytts therin contained was sequestrat in their Lordships Clerks hands and ordained to remain therin till farther orders from the saids Lords and seing the petitioner hath purchased the estate of Kincardine at a publict Roup before the Lords of Councill and session as the decreit of sale produced did testifie Wherby he is unquestionable propriator of said estate and hes right to the Chartor Chist and wrytts therin contained and haill wrytts and evidence of the saids Lands and estate Therfore Craveing that it might have pleased the saids Lords in consideration of the premissis To ordaine and give warrant to the saids Clerks of privie Councill In whose hands the said Chartor Chist and wrytts was sequestrat To Deliver upon the same to the petitioner and to ordain the havers of the keyes and all others havers of any of the wrytts and evidents taken out of the said Chartor Chist to deliver the samen to the petitioner wpon oath as haveing right in maner forsaid and that upon a Charge of six dayes as the said petition bears Which petition being read wpon the Nynth of August Jai vijc years In presence of His Grace His Majseties high Commissioner and the Lords of His Majesties privie Councill They alloued the Countes of Kincardine to sie and ansuer the samen against tuesday then nixt, according to which appoyntment the said Countes and the Earle of Kincardin her sone haveing seen the said petition They returned the same with the ansuers following viz Primo That it was notourly knoune they have ane intrest in the said Chartor Chist and all the wrytts belonging to the Late Earle of Kincardine and both the Countes and the Earle being then out of toun Their Lawers were not particularly informed of all the objections that might be made: why the said Chartor Chest and wryts aught not to be delivered up to the Livetennent Collonell and it then being in the vaccance tyme when people did not ordinarly attend Their Lordships might be pleased to delay the matter till November and then all parties concerned might be heared why the Chartor Chest and wryts aught not to be delivered up Secundo The Livetennent Collonells petition bears That the said Chartor Chest and wryts were sequestrat upon the application of the deceist Lord Cardros so that the sequestration being upon the application of a particular person It aught not to be taken off without Calling some person who will take upon them to represent the Lord Cardros Tertio when the Livetennent Collonell was caryeing on the action of Sale There being Compearance made for the Earle of Kincardine and it being alleadged for him that the sale could not proceed at the instance of the Creditors of Earle Alexander his Father Because the Estate belonged to Earle Eduard this Earles Uncle and he was served air to him in speciall and infeft so that this earle as air to Earle Eduard had the only right to the estate and therfore It could not be sold for payment of Earle Alexanders debts and if Earle Alexander had any right to the estate in his person as he had not It was satisfied and Extinguished by his Intromissions And wpon these grounds this Earle had raised a Reduction which he repeated and was instantly ready to debate his right wpon which The Lords of Session by their act the fourteinth of February Jaj vjc Nynty nyn allowed the proces of sale to proceid Reserveing the present Earle his Reduction as accords As appeared by the act produced which was lykwayes insert in the decreit of sale and if the Earle prevaill in his reduction as he did not doubt but he would Then the Decreit of Sale and all that hes folloued upon will fall in consequence So that the Earle haveing so good and clear ane intrest to the Chartor Chest and wryts of the estate They aught not to be given up to the Livetennent collonell But lye still in the Clerks hands before the event of the Earles Reduction Especially seeing there is many wryts in the Chartor Chest That the Earle will have use for in caryeing on of the Reduction and the Livetennent Collonell hes no prejudice by the Chartor Chest and wryts being continued and sequestrat in the Clerks hands For in the mein tyme he may have out what papers he hes use for in order to the passing Infeftment upon his decreit of sale if he has a mynd as the Earle may take out such wryts as he shall think necessary for caryeing on the Reduction parties giveing their recepts to deliver the samen back to the Clerks of Councill and certainly if the forsaid reservation of the Earles Right and Reduction have any effect it most be this That the Charter Chist and wryts of the estate should lye sequestrat in the Clerks hands before the event of the said Reduction Quarto As to that pairt of the petition Craveing that all other havers of any wryts taken out of the Chartor Chist should be ordained to2 deliver the samen back upon oath and that upon a summar charge of sex days It is most rediculous and abswrd For first how can there be a decreit against any person for exhibition and delivery of wryts without Calling of them secundo This were to grant Generall Letters against all and sundrie Which is Dounright contrair to the act of parliament dischargeing Generall Letters except for the Kings rents In respect wherof The desyre of the petition aught to be Refused and the Chartor chist and wryts aught to continue sequestrat in the Clerks hands untill the event of the Earles Reduction alloueing aither partie in the mean tyme to have up such of the wryts as they shall have use for upon their Recept and obligation to deliver the same back again to the Clerks as the saids ansuers also bears Therafter the Lords of His Majesties privie Councill haveing upon the day and date of thir presents Considered the above petition given in to them by the above Livetennents Collonell Erskine with the above ansuers therto by the Countes of Kincardine and ane petition for Sir Alexander Bruce of Broomhall They heirby nominat and appoynt The Lord Theasurer deput The Lords Aberuchill and Rankeilor or any tuo of them to Inspect the Chartor chest of the Estate of Kincardine formerly sequestrat in the hands of the Clerks of Councill upon application of the Lord Cardross and to Deliver up to the said Livetennent Collonell John Erskine such wrytts rights and evidents of the Estate of Kincardine bought by him at a publict roup as shall be found in the said Chartor chest upon Inventar first made of the same and his granting Recept wpon the foot of the Inventar of the wryts received by him Which is to be left in the said Chartor Chist where the saids wryts shall be taken out And alloues the said Countes and Sir Alexander Bruce or any for them in their name to be present at Inspecting of the said Chartor Chest and Delivering up to the said Livetennent collonell John Erskine the wryts Rights and evidents he shall have right to in mainer forsaid and Recomends to the said Committie to take inspection of the other rights and papers that shall be left in the saids Chartor Chists and to report their proceidings therin and anent the premises to the Councill with their first convenience and appoynts any tuo of the forsaid Committie to be a sufficient quourm

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 1701

D1701/3/31

Act

Act Livetennent Collonell Erskine anent the Chartor Chest of Kincardine

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of His Majesties privie Councill By Livetennent Collonell John Erskine Governour of Dumbarton Castle Shewing That where wpon application made to their Lordships by the Deceist Henry Lord Cardose The Chartor Chist of Kincardine and wrytts therin contained was sequestrat in their Lordships Clerks hands and ordained to remain therin till farther orders from the saids Lords and seing the petitioner hath purchased the estate of Kincardine at a publict Roup before the Lords of Councill and session as the decreit of sale produced did testifie Wherby he is unquestionable propriator of said estate and hes right to the Chartor Chist and wrytts therin contained and haill wrytts and evidence of the saids Lands and estate Therfore Craveing that it might have pleased the saids Lords in consideration of the premissis To ordaine and give warrant to the saids Clerks of privie Councill In whose hands the said Chartor Chist and wrytts was sequestrat To Deliver upon the same to the petitioner and to ordain the havers of the keyes and all others havers of any of the wrytts and evidents taken out of the said Chartor Chist to deliver the samen to the petitioner wpon oath as haveing right in maner forsaid and that upon a Charge of six dayes as the said petition bears Which petition being read wpon the Nynth of August Jai vijc years In presence of His Grace His Majseties high Commissioner and the Lords of His Majesties privie Councill They alloued the Countes of Kincardine to sie and ansuer the samen against tuesday then nixt, according to which appoyntment the said Countes and the Earle of Kincardin her sone haveing seen the said petition They returned the same with the ansuers following viz Primo That it was notourly knoune they have ane intrest in the said Chartor Chist and all the wrytts belonging to the Late Earle of Kincardine and both the Countes and the Earle being then out of toun Their Lawers were not particularly informed of all the objections that might be made: why the said Chartor Chest and wryts aught not to be delivered up to the Livetennent Collonell and it then being in the vaccance tyme when people did not ordinarly attend Their Lordships might be pleased to delay the matter till November and then all parties concerned might be heared why the Chartor Chest and wryts aught not to be delivered up Secundo The Livetennent Collonells petition bears That the said Chartor Chest and wryts were sequestrat upon the application of the deceist Lord Cardros so that the sequestration being upon the application of a particular person It aught not to be taken off without Calling some person who will take upon them to represent the Lord Cardros Tertio when the Livetennent Collonell was caryeing on the action of Sale There being Compearance made for the Earle of Kincardine and it being alleadged for him that the sale could not proceed at the instance of the Creditors of Earle Alexander his Father Because the Estate belonged to Earle Eduard this Earles Uncle and he was served air to him in speciall and infeft so that this earle as air to Earle Eduard had the only right to the estate and therfore It could not be sold for payment of Earle Alexanders debts and if Earle Alexander had any right to the estate in his person as he had not It was satisfied and Extinguished by his Intromissions And wpon these grounds this Earle had raised a Reduction which he repeated and was instantly ready to debate his right wpon which The Lords of Session by their act the fourteinth of February Jaj vjc Nynty nyn allowed the proces of sale to proceid Reserveing the present Earle his Reduction as accords As appeared by the act produced which was lykwayes insert in the decreit of sale and if the Earle prevaill in his reduction as he did not doubt but he would Then the Decreit of Sale and all that hes folloued upon will fall in consequence So that the Earle haveing so good and clear ane intrest to the Chartor Chest and wryts of the estate They aught not to be given up to the Livetennent collonell But lye still in the Clerks hands before the event of the Earles Reduction Especially seeing there is many wryts in the Chartor Chest That the Earle will have use for in caryeing on of the Reduction and the Livetennent Collonell hes no prejudice by the Chartor Chest and wryts being continued and sequestrat in the Clerks hands For in the mein tyme he may have out what papers he hes use for in order to the passing Infeftment upon his decreit of sale if he has a mynd as the Earle may take out such wryts as he shall think necessary for caryeing on the Reduction parties giveing their recepts to deliver the samen back to the Clerks of Councill and certainly if the forsaid reservation of the Earles Right and Reduction have any effect it most be this That the Charter Chist and wryts of the estate should lye sequestrat in the Clerks hands before the event of the said Reduction Quarto As to that pairt of the petition Craveing that all other havers of any wryts taken out of the Chartor Chist should be ordained to2 deliver the samen back upon oath and that upon a summar charge of sex days It is most rediculous and abswrd For first how can there be a decreit against any person for exhibition and delivery of wryts without Calling of them secundo This were to grant Generall Letters against all and sundrie Which is Dounright contrair to the act of parliament dischargeing Generall Letters except for the Kings rents In respect wherof The desyre of the petition aught to be Refused and the Chartor chist and wryts aught to continue sequestrat in the Clerks hands untill the event of the Earles Reduction alloueing aither partie in the mean tyme to have up such of the wryts as they shall have use for upon their Recept and obligation to deliver the same back again to the Clerks as the saids ansuers also bears Therafter the Lords of His Majesties privie Councill haveing upon the day and date of thir presents Considered the above petition given in to them by the above Livetennents Collonell Erskine with the above ansuers therto by the Countes of Kincardine and ane petition for Sir Alexander Bruce of Broomhall They heirby nominat and appoynt The Lord Theasurer deput The Lords Aberuchill and Rankeilor or any tuo of them to Inspect the Chartor chest of the Estate of Kincardine formerly sequestrat in the hands of the Clerks of Councill upon application of the Lord Cardross and to Deliver up to the said Livetennent Collonell John Erskine such wrytts rights and evidents of the Estate of Kincardine bought by him at a publict roup as shall be found in the said Chartor chest upon Inventar first made of the same and his granting Recept wpon the foot of the Inventar of the wryts received by him Which is to be left in the said Chartor Chist where the saids wryts shall be taken out And alloues the said Countes and Sir Alexander Bruce or any for them in their name to be present at Inspecting of the said Chartor Chest and Delivering up to the said Livetennent collonell John Erskine the wryts Rights and evidents he shall have right to in mainer forsaid and Recomends to the said Committie to take inspection of the other rights and papers that shall be left in the saids Chartor Chists and to report their proceidings therin and anent the premises to the Councill with their first convenience and appoynts any tuo of the forsaid Committie to be a sufficient quourm

1. NRS, PC2/28, 4v-43v.

2. The word ‘be’ scored out here.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 4v-43v.

2. The word ‘be’ scored out here.

Act, 4 March 1701, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 1701

D1701/3/21

Act

Act Gordon of Campdell for a protection to Witneses

Anent the petition given in to the Lord of his Majesties privie Councill by Alexander Gordon of Campdell Shewing That where The Lords of his Majesties privie Councill at the Advyseing of the decreits and suspenswns obtained and raised toutching The barbarous depredation Hamsucken and roberie Committed upon Glenkindie in his oune house The saids Lords ordained That besyd the Tutor of Weem and the petitioner Gordon of Cambdell against whom the account of their men found to have had some accession to the said depredation decreits had passed Which they had suspended and the saids Lords found orderly proceided and that the petitioner and they should goe on to persew the principall actors or other accessaries both men and masters To the effect that all being Decerned They might the better recover their releiff In persewance of which ordinance The petitioner and the said Tutor have raised summonds before the saids Lords against certain persons pairt of them belonging to the Earl of Aboyn and pairt to the Laird of Grant and also against Knockespocks elder and younger and Adam Gordon Late of Glenbucket, In which proces They are to adduce Donald Camron somtyme in Carniserach Alexander Menzies in Kinilachar, John Roy Menzies alias Mcockvie there John M’artur somtyme in Carrie brother to Robert M’artur of Aird Angus M’coil vic Jandus vig in […] Rorie Kennedie in […] Camiferach Callum Breack M’Jean vic Phadrick Glengairdne Grigar Breack M’Jan vc phandrick his brother in Daocharn John Crookshank younger in Rinaira William Bain M’pherson in Pilgalish as necessary witnesses as the petitioner was content to give his oath therupon conforme to the act of parliament Jaj vjc Eighty one, Who needed the said proces Lykeas ther are some of them to whom the saids Lords granted their protection against the petitioner So that the saids Lords would certainly allow the petitioner the same Justice That was alloued against him and seing that by the forsaid act of parliament Jaj vjc Eighty one The said Lords are authorized and also in use to grant protection in such caises Therfore humbly Craveing That it might have pleased the saids Lords to grant the protection to the forsaids persons To the effect That they may Compear to give evidence in the proces and that for the space and in the termes of the forsaid act of parliament Reserveing objections against the witnesses as accords as the said petition bears Which petition being read upon the fourt of February last In presence of His Majesties high Commissioner and Lords of His majesties privie Councell They alloued any persons concerned to sie and answer the same Therafter wpon the tuenty day of the said moneth of Feburary their Lordships haveing considered the said petition and ansuers made therto by Charles Earle of Aboyn The Lairds of Grant Knockespocks elder and younger and Glenbucket They Delayed to give ansuer to the said petition untill both parties procurators were heard and appoynted both parties and their procurators to be readie and attend the Councill wpon the tuenty seventh day of the said moneth now bygone and therafter the saids Lords of his Majesties privie Councill haveing considered the said petition and ansuers forsaid made therto by the said Earle of Aboyn and others abovenamed and Sir James Stewart Her2 Majesties Advocat Mr David Dalrymple Mr James Mackenzie Mr William Carmichell Mr William Calderwood and Mr Robert Forbes senior Compearing as Advocats for the said Gordon of Camdell and Mr James Nesmyth Mr Francis Grant and Sir Alexander Cumming Compearing as Advocats for the saids Earle of Aboyn Lairds of Grant Knockespocks elder and younger and Glenbucket and the Lauers for both parties being fully heard at the Councill barrr The Councill Nominated and Appoynted a Committie of their oune number to endeavour to setle and agree both parties in the matter mentioned in the said petition and ansuers made therto and the said Commity haveing Failzied to setle and agree the saids parties and the saids Lords of His Majesties privie Councill haveing this day considered the said petition with the ansuers forsaid made therto by the abovenamed Earle and others in their oune presence They Doe heirby Grant personall protection To Donald Camron somtyme in Camiserach Alexander Menzies in Kinilacher John Roy Menzies alias M’coile vick Indue John M’artur somtyme in Carie Brother to Robert M’artur of Aird Angus M’oile vc Ian due vig in […] Rorie Kennedie in Camiserach Callum Breack M’Ian vic phadrick on Glengairdine Grigor Breack M’Ian vic phadrick3 his brother in Daocharn John Crookshank younger in Kinaira, William Bain M’pherson in Pitgalish as necessary witnesses in the above proces from the first day of June nixt to the first day of July therafter Riserveing all objections which may be made against them when they are Laid as witneses as accords Heirby Dischargeing all Macers Messingers at armes officers within burgh or Landward to putt any Letters of Caption acts of warding or any other personall dilligence to execution against the forenamed persons untill the forsaid day Excepting alwayes His Majesties Rents and publict dues, subscribitur ut in sederunt

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 1701

D1701/3/21

Act

Act Gordon of Campdell for a protection to Witneses

Anent the petition given in to the Lord of his Majesties privie Councill by Alexander Gordon of Campdell Shewing That where The Lords of his Majesties privie Councill at the Advyseing of the decreits and suspenswns obtained and raised toutching The barbarous depredation Hamsucken and roberie Committed upon Glenkindie in his oune house The saids Lords ordained That besyd the Tutor of Weem and the petitioner Gordon of Cambdell against whom the account of their men found to have had some accession to the said depredation decreits had passed Which they had suspended and the saids Lords found orderly proceided and that the petitioner and they should goe on to persew the principall actors or other accessaries both men and masters To the effect that all being Decerned They might the better recover their releiff In persewance of which ordinance The petitioner and the said Tutor have raised summonds before the saids Lords against certain persons pairt of them belonging to the Earl of Aboyn and pairt to the Laird of Grant and also against Knockespocks elder and younger and Adam Gordon Late of Glenbucket, In which proces They are to adduce Donald Camron somtyme in Carniserach Alexander Menzies in Kinilachar, John Roy Menzies alias Mcockvie there John M’artur somtyme in Carrie brother to Robert M’artur of Aird Angus M’coil vic Jandus vig in […] Rorie Kennedie in […] Camiferach Callum Breack M’Jean vic Phadrick Glengairdne Grigar Breack M’Jan vc phandrick his brother in Daocharn John Crookshank younger in Rinaira William Bain M’pherson in Pilgalish as necessary witnesses as the petitioner was content to give his oath therupon conforme to the act of parliament Jaj vjc Eighty one, Who needed the said proces Lykeas ther are some of them to whom the saids Lords granted their protection against the petitioner So that the saids Lords would certainly allow the petitioner the same Justice That was alloued against him and seing that by the forsaid act of parliament Jaj vjc Eighty one The said Lords are authorized and also in use to grant protection in such caises Therfore humbly Craveing That it might have pleased the saids Lords to grant the protection to the forsaids persons To the effect That they may Compear to give evidence in the proces and that for the space and in the termes of the forsaid act of parliament Reserveing objections against the witnesses as accords as the said petition bears Which petition being read upon the fourt of February last In presence of His Majesties high Commissioner and Lords of His majesties privie Councell They alloued any persons concerned to sie and answer the same Therafter wpon the tuenty day of the said moneth of Feburary their Lordships haveing considered the said petition and ansuers made therto by Charles Earle of Aboyn The Lairds of Grant Knockespocks elder and younger and Glenbucket They Delayed to give ansuer to the said petition untill both parties procurators were heard and appoynted both parties and their procurators to be readie and attend the Councill wpon the tuenty seventh day of the said moneth now bygone and therafter the saids Lords of his Majesties privie Councill haveing considered the said petition and ansuers forsaid made therto by the said Earle of Aboyn and others abovenamed and Sir James Stewart Her2 Majesties Advocat Mr David Dalrymple Mr James Mackenzie Mr William Carmichell Mr William Calderwood and Mr Robert Forbes senior Compearing as Advocats for the said Gordon of Camdell and Mr James Nesmyth Mr Francis Grant and Sir Alexander Cumming Compearing as Advocats for the saids Earle of Aboyn Lairds of Grant Knockespocks elder and younger and Glenbucket and the Lauers for both parties being fully heard at the Councill barrr The Councill Nominated and Appoynted a Committie of their oune number to endeavour to setle and agree both parties in the matter mentioned in the said petition and ansuers made therto and the said Commity haveing Failzied to setle and agree the saids parties and the saids Lords of His Majesties privie Councill haveing this day considered the said petition with the ansuers forsaid made therto by the abovenamed Earle and others in their oune presence They Doe heirby Grant personall protection To Donald Camron somtyme in Camiserach Alexander Menzies in Kinilacher John Roy Menzies alias M’coile vick Indue John M’artur somtyme in Carie Brother to Robert M’artur of Aird Angus M’oile vc Ian due vig in […] Rorie Kennedie in Camiserach Callum Breack M’Ian vic phadrick on Glengairdine Grigor Breack M’Ian vic phadrick3 his brother in Daocharn John Crookshank younger in Kinaira, William Bain M’pherson in Pitgalish as necessary witnesses in the above proces from the first day of June nixt to the first day of July therafter Riserveing all objections which may be made against them when they are Laid as witneses as accords Heirby Dischargeing all Macers Messingers at armes officers within burgh or Landward to putt any Letters of Caption acts of warding or any other personall dilligence to execution against the forenamed persons untill the forsaid day Excepting alwayes His Majesties Rents and publict dues, subscribitur ut in sederunt

1. NRS, PC2/28, 40r-41r.

2. Sic.

3. The words ‘in Glengard’ scored out here.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 40r-41r.

2. Sic.

3. The words ‘in Glengard’ scored out here.

Sederunt, 4 March 1701, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 17011

D1701/3/12

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Argyle; Earl of Mar; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Leven; Lord Montgomrie; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Forbes; Lord Advocat; Lord Theasurer deput; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Halcraig; Lord Rankeilor; Mr Frances Montgomry; Laird of Grant; Lord provost Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the fourt day of March 17011

D1701/3/12

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Argyle; Earl of Mar; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Leven; Lord Montgomrie; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Forbes; Lord Advocat; Lord Theasurer deput; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Halcraig; Lord Rankeilor; Mr Frances Montgomry; Laird of Grant; Lord provost Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/28, 40r.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 40r.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 40r.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 40r.

Act, 14 March 1700 (pm), Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem

D1700/3/131

Act

Act Duncan Robertson sone to Strowan

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be Duncan Robertsone sone to the deceast Laird of Strowan Shewing That the petitioner haveing the Missfortune as to fall out of the petitioners mothers favor occasioned by the Malicious advice of some who bear no good will to their family, She has been instigate to raise a Councill process against the petitioner upon very triviall matters And at the same time ther was raised against the petitioner a Laborrowes before the Lords of Session and the petitioners being charged upon both came here to Edinburgh the Last week to answer the Councill Lybell, And find Cautione of the Laborawes And haveing never a thought that the petitioners mother would have taken out a Caption of Laborowes against the petitioner, who was in oppen Street attacked with a Caption at her instance and put in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh Notwithstanding that the petitioner offered to Suspend the Laborrows instantly upon Sufficient Cautione And She finding that it was easie for the petitioner to doe the Same she takes out a Councill Laborowes and therupon charges the petitioner in prison and when he was offering Sufficient Cautione to the Clerk of Councill in order to his getting Suspensione and Charge to sett at Libertie She gives in a petition to the saids Lords representing that she hade a Councill proces depending against the petitioner, That if he were sett at Liberty he would not answer the proces bot absent himself; And therfore Craveing that the petitioner Should remaine in prison Notwithstanding of any Cautione offered Untill the petitioner Should also find Cautione to answer before the saids Lords to her lybell, Upon which petitione The saids Lords delyverance bears That the petitioner should see and answer the said petition against this day and in the mean time should remaine in prison untill bill and answers were advised As to which the petitioner must in the first place begg leave to represent to the saids Lords that the petitioner hade been very harshly dealt with by the the2 petitioners mother in this matter for the petitioner came purposely to Edinburgh to have Subjected himself to her And to have gott the medication of freinds for takeing away any difference amongst us, And the severalls spock to her They found her not to be intreated, Nixt the demand of her petition is most unreasonable for seing the petitioner was ready to find Cautione in the Laborrowes the petitioner ought therupon to be sett at Liberty in Comon forme, In not being any wayes usuall before the saids Lords for persones cited upon Councill Lybells to find Cautione to answer to them, And Seing that the petitioner came purposely here to answer and that the petitioner is ready to Doe the same It was not doubted bot the saids Lords would ordaine the petitioner to be sett at Liberty upon the petitioners finding Caution, That so the petitioner might be in the usuall Circumstances of all defendents before the saids Lords who were not Conveened for publict Crymes Ther being nothing in this matter betwixt the petitioners mother and him bot a private grudge as the petition bears, The Lords of his majesties privy Councill Haveing Considered the above petition given in to them be the above Duncan Robertsone They doe hereby give order and warrant to the above Duncan […] and keeper of their Tolbooth To sett the petitioner at Liberty furth therof Inso farr as he is prisoner therin by order of Councill The said petitioner allwayes first before his said aberation procureing suspension relaxatione and Charge to put at Liberty against the Councill Laborrowes raised at the petitioners mothers instance against him.

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem

D1700/3/131

Act

Act Duncan Robertson sone to Strowan

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be Duncan Robertsone sone to the deceast Laird of Strowan Shewing That the petitioner haveing the Missfortune as to fall out of the petitioners mothers favor occasioned by the Malicious advice of some who bear no good will to their family, She has been instigate to raise a Councill process against the petitioner upon very triviall matters And at the same time ther was raised against the petitioner a Laborrowes before the Lords of Session and the petitioners being charged upon both came here to Edinburgh the Last week to answer the Councill Lybell, And find Cautione of the Laborawes And haveing never a thought that the petitioners mother would have taken out a Caption of Laborowes against the petitioner, who was in oppen Street attacked with a Caption at her instance and put in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh Notwithstanding that the petitioner offered to Suspend the Laborrows instantly upon Sufficient Cautione And She finding that it was easie for the petitioner to doe the Same she takes out a Councill Laborowes and therupon charges the petitioner in prison and when he was offering Sufficient Cautione to the Clerk of Councill in order to his getting Suspensione and Charge to sett at Libertie She gives in a petition to the saids Lords representing that she hade a Councill proces depending against the petitioner, That if he were sett at Liberty he would not answer the proces bot absent himself; And therfore Craveing that the petitioner Should remaine in prison Notwithstanding of any Cautione offered Untill the petitioner Should also find Cautione to answer before the saids Lords to her lybell, Upon which petitione The saids Lords delyverance bears That the petitioner should see and answer the said petition against this day and in the mean time should remaine in prison untill bill and answers were advised As to which the petitioner must in the first place begg leave to represent to the saids Lords that the petitioner hade been very harshly dealt with by the the2 petitioners mother in this matter for the petitioner came purposely to Edinburgh to have Subjected himself to her And to have gott the medication of freinds for takeing away any difference amongst us, And the severalls spock to her They found her not to be intreated, Nixt the demand of her petition is most unreasonable for seing the petitioner was ready to find Cautione in the Laborrowes the petitioner ought therupon to be sett at Liberty in Comon forme, In not being any wayes usuall before the saids Lords for persones cited upon Councill Lybells to find Cautione to answer to them, And Seing that the petitioner came purposely here to answer and that the petitioner is ready to Doe the same It was not doubted bot the saids Lords would ordaine the petitioner to be sett at Liberty upon the petitioners finding Caution, That so the petitioner might be in the usuall Circumstances of all defendents before the saids Lords who were not Conveened for publict Crymes Ther being nothing in this matter betwixt the petitioners mother and him bot a private grudge as the petition bears, The Lords of his majesties privy Councill Haveing Considered the above petition given in to them be the above Duncan Robertsone They doe hereby give order and warrant to the above Duncan […] and keeper of their Tolbooth To sett the petitioner at Liberty furth therof Inso farr as he is prisoner therin by order of Councill The said petitioner allwayes first before his said aberation procureing suspension relaxatione and Charge to put at Liberty against the Councill Laborrowes raised at the petitioners mothers instance against him.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 333r-334r.

2. Sic.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 333r-334r.

2. Sic.

Warrant, 14 March 1700 (pm), Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem

D1700/3/121

Warrant

Warrand for Allan Walkinshaw To Cite Roscoby and others

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Haveing Considered a petitione given in to them be Allan Walkinshaw and petition by way of answer therto for William Andersone They hereby Ordaine the said Allan Walkinshaw to cite […] Multrey of Roscobie or any other persone he pleases to appear before their Lordships the first Councill day of June nixt to answer to what may be Laid to their charge as to any of the points and articles of the Lybell betwixt Anderson and Walkinshaw et e Contra and in the mean time sists all executione upon the process at Andersones instance against Walkinshaw.

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem

D1700/3/121

Warrant

Warrand for Allan Walkinshaw To Cite Roscoby and others

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Haveing Considered a petitione given in to them be Allan Walkinshaw and petition by way of answer therto for William Andersone They hereby Ordaine the said Allan Walkinshaw to cite […] Multrey of Roscobie or any other persone he pleases to appear before their Lordships the first Councill day of June nixt to answer to what may be Laid to their charge as to any of the points and articles of the Lybell betwixt Anderson and Walkinshaw et e Contra and in the mean time sists all executione upon the process at Andersones instance against Walkinshaw.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 333v.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 333v.

Decreet, 14 March 1700 (pm), Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem

D1700/3/111

Decreet

Decreit absolvitor Dunlope and others Taxsmen of excyse Against The Magistrats of Aberdeen et e contra

Anent the Lybell or Letters of Complaint raised and pursued before the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill at the Instance of James Dunlope of Househill for himself and as one of the Tacksmen of the six peny excyse from the first of March Jaj vic nyntie Eight And William Campbell one of his Majesties troop of guards who by order of the Earle of Argyll Commanded a partie of Collonell Rowes Regiment sent to quarter for deficiency in the Town of Aberdeen and […] Cruickshank Serjant in the said Regiment with Concourse of Sir James Stewart his majesties advocat for his highnes in trust in the matter underwrittin Makeing Mentione That wher all riysing in armes and unlawfull Convocations of any of his majesties Leidges especially within burgh to hinder and Obstruct the executione of his majesties Lawes and Sentence of Lawfull Judicatories for raising and ingathering of the excyse or any other part of his Majesties publict revenue by the fermers and tacksmen therof, or these Imployed under them, and the assaulting or attacking of their persones invadeing their houses wher they are leidged and attempting to burne the Same, And Wounding their Land Lords for harbouring and resetting of them, And the breaking open of prisones and Carieing away of goods Lawfullie poynded for payment of his Majesties revenues and disposeing therof at their pleasure, or the beatting of the persones of Souldiers Imployed in quartering for excyse upon deficients and breaking of their armes, as also for the Magistrats of burghs to Contrive at incouradge and Foster such unlawfull convocationes and to refuse to Suppress rableing and Tumults raised and made within burgh And to concurr in extorting warrands under the hands of the farmers of his Majesties excyse or any of the mto dismiss and sett at Libertie persones duely Committed to prisons for debts due to his Majesties or for being accessory to or concerned in Tumultuous Convocation or rableing within their burghs and their refuseing to put in executione the decreets and Sentances against these lyable in payment of the excyse due to his Majestie within the said burgh or not to protect assist and defend these of his Majesties forces Imployed Conforme to Law to quarter upon deficients within their burgh are all Crymes of ane high Nature and by the Lawes of this and all other weell governed nationes Especially when done in the open day, And the saids acts of Tumult and unlawfull convocatione in armes are persisted and Continued in for Severall dayes after others Ought to be Severly punished Nevertheless It is of verity that the brewars of the burgh of Aberdeen haveing the time of the forsaid tack partly made no entries and partly made Short entries The forsaids Tacksmen were Necessitate In the Moneths of March and Aprill Last to Conveen the saids brewars before the baillies of the said burgh and to referr the quantities browen by them and of their concealled Liquors to their oathes Wherupon albeit they did Compear, yet refuseing to give their oathes theranent They and each of them were holden as confest for their respective quantities Lybelled against them and the decreets past therupon, accordingly Bot the brewars persisting in their Contumacy The Tacksmen after long patience were necessitat to send a partie of Souldiers under the Command of the said William Campbell, and by order abovementioned to quarter upon the deficients within the said burgh upon the Twentie two of November Last or one or other of the dayes of the said moneth, The Commander of the said partie haveing quartered upon some of the deficients, and taken some poynds out of Severalls of their housses Conforme to the method and order prescrybed by diverse Lawes and acts of parliament made theranent, The saids persones poynded and […] Archibald sone to John Archibald in Aberdeen, John Craig baxter William Troop Merchant ther, John Buchan baxter ther, John Wright merchant Alexander Gibb Cordinar and his servant, Adam Lyell servitor to Collonell Buchan Alexander Brans Flesher, William Lorimer baxter John Cushney merchant, George Cumming sone to William Cumming merchant James Ross maltman George Taylor ther, William Burnet Merchant William Stewart Weaver John Clerk Cuttler and […] Cutler his brother James Robison Carpenter, Thomas Walker baxter, Alexander Ross flesher James Smith blacksmith and his Stepsone and Servants, Alexander Duff baxter William Spence hooker James Ritchie servant to Mary Ogilvie and John Gellon flesher, George Patton Laird of Grandhome James Clerk Cuttler and […] Maitland Waitter in Aberdeen James Hoge Maltman James Buchan baxter, Abram Thomsone merchant Adam Mark wright […] Strachan Servitor to William Cook Patrick Meldrum servitor to John Findlay John Scot prentise to James Douglas, Alexander Aberdeen Couper Baillie Robertsone Maltman […] Cook son to William Cook David Jack Weaver, Androw Fergusone Robert Smith Deacon of the Taylors Issobell Innes representative of Bessie Lawson Mary More spouse to George Robertsone bellman Jean Gordon spouse to William Jaffrey horss hyrer Issobell Issobell2 Naughty servant to John Burnet Robert Pope servant to George Ross Pentherer, Alexander Painer and […] his sposue James Johnstone Litster Mr Alexander Lessly Fisscall and John Lessly Late Conveener all in Aberdeen Shaking off all fear of God and regaird to the Lawes and acts of parliament made either for the Security of the peace or orderly payment of his majesties revenue, Bot in Insolent and open Contempt of the Same did Convocat assemble and draw togither the haill Comonality and mobb of the Towne of Aberdeen armed with Swords Guns halbarts Durks and Baganots and other weapons invasive upon the evening of the forsaid day in Severall Companies under Sillence and Cloud night did with great tumult threaten and with violence break into severall houses Searching for and Stryveing to apprehend the said James Dunlope and of his Majesties tacksmen of the excuse And who hade the direction of the party quartering upon the deficients, Threatening to kill murder and assissinat him, And particularly they brock into the house of John Stewart Collector of the excise at that place appointed by the Taxsmen, And after hewing down his portall door brock into his house violently brusting open the door of every roome therin And after nearow Search throw out every Corner of the house Stabbed the bedds with Swords and Bagganets to discover if he was Lurking ther, And Cutt and wounded the Said John Stewart Land Lord of the house for harbouring and absconding the Said James Dunlope, And to such height of Insulting insolencie did this rable and tumult proceed into That they took the boldness to fire severall Musket Shotts into the said John Stewarts brewhouse of Sett purpose and designe to sett the Cumbustible matter therin in fire therby to burne and Consume in the flames the said John Stewarts dwalling house adjacent therto In prosecution of their malicious and furious threatenings And which hade Certainly taken effect And come to apss, If it hade not been prevented by the vigerous industrie of the said John Stewarts Servants, and not resting here they had the Impudence to attack and seaze upo nthe partie of his Majesties Souldiers dispersed in their severall quarters, And to carie off Break and distroy their armes Tear and distroy his Majesties Cloathing wherwith they were appearalled with great indignity and dispite, and therafter violently brock open the housses and seller doors wher the poynded goods were laid up and after Beatting and abuseing his majesties Souldiers for offering to preserve the poinds They violently and Masterfully caried away both the Souldiers armes and the poynded goods to the Trades hall And Continued ther rageing violence up and down the toune till two of the Cloak in the Morning over the tacksmen and Souldiers whom they hade rabled beatten and abused in maner forsaid, And Farder William Cochran of Ferguslie another of the Tacksmen Aryveing at the said burgh of Aberdeen upon the twenty fifth day of the said moneth of November Did Immediatly apply to the Magistrats for their assistance in puting the Decreets against deficients in executione And for protecting and Supporting the partie of his Majesties Souldiers Imployed for Supporting and assisting the legall execution against the brewars for the deficient excise Bot so farr were the saids Magistrats viz […]3 Mitchell provest of Aberdeen […] Ragg […] Forbes […] Kerr and […] Pattoune Baillies of the said burgh from performing their dutie in the said matter That when the saids Tacksmen and partie of Souldiers forsaid hade legally apprehended one of the deficient brewars and caried him to the toune Councill house Requyreing the Magistrates to Committ and detaine him prisoner Conforme to Law They the saids magistrats in Manifast Neglect of their dutie and by avowed Connivance and incouradgment to the rable againe to assemble in armes and Shift and refuse to Committ the said deficient brewary prisoner for his excise by the Space of severall hours Upon a Shame pretence that the Goyaller could not be hade and after the forsaid rable and Comonality hade been this incouradged and fostered by the Connivance and underhand incouradgment from the saids Magistrates the said William Cochran pursuer perceiveing the Rable allong the Street Requyred the Magistrates in presence of severall Gentlmen to use and interpose their authority for preserveing the pace in Suppressing and quasieing the forsaid tumult and in Lawfull Convocatione and protecting the saids Tacksmen pursuers and took […] Ane of the Baillies by the hand intreating him to Stay and Joyne with the Taxsmen pursuers and severall other gentlmen then present on the street for that effect Bot least the presence of a Magistrat might have discouradged and dispersed the said Rable, The said baillie did thrust himself out of the said William Cochrans hand and he with the rest of the magistrats Did reteir off the Streets and abscond themselves to the effect the rable might insult the tacksmen and Committ other disorders at their pleasure, And accordingly the saids defenders did with the rest of the rable in a most furious and tumultary maner attack the said James Dunlope upon the Streets With Swords Guns and halberts With Manifast designe to murder and assissinat him upon the place as they would have done if hade not been Surrounded and defended by Forbes of Foveraigne and Severall other Gentlmen, Who Committed the said James Dunlope and William Cochran to the house of the said Forbes of Foveraigne in the toune of Aberdeen for their security, The said defenders and their said rable haveing in the mean time marched in a most arrogant and insulting Maner in open day about two of the Cloak in the afternoon upon the said twentie Eight day of November or ane or other of the dayes of the said moneth to the Tolbooth of the said burgh of Aberdeen to break open the prisone doors for rescueing the prisoners detained therin, Bot Immediatly they with four or fyve hundred of their rable did Surround and Incompase the said Forbes of Foveraigne his dwalling house demanding the said James Dunlope and William Cochran That they might Dewite and dispatch them And by no intreaty of Foveraine and other gentlemen could be diswaded from such a villainous attempt, Threatening to burne the house about their ears if his Majesties saids tacksmen were not delyvered up tothem and which wicked interprize They hade certainly accomplished If Foveraigne goeing to the magistrats by a backway and acquainting them with the great danger and distress the Taxsmen were in by the fury and violence of the rable hade not prevailled with the said rable for some delay to the executione of their fury Bot so farr were the Magistrats from doeing their dutie In Suppressing the rable and protecting his majesties said tacksmen That as ane incitement and incouradgment to the rable they expressly declared they would not concerne themselves nor interpose in the matter Unless his Majesties tacksmen would give a positive Order under their hand to dismiss and sett at Libertie Such persones as wes prisoners either for the former tumult or deficiencie of excise and sent their Fiscall openly to intimat the Samen Wherupon his Majesties tacksmen were Constrained to grant warrand for setting at Libertie Such of the prisoners as the magistrate pleased Bot this being refused they were forced foir delyvering themselves from the present Imment danger to grant a positive order to sett all the prisoners at Libertie Which how Soon Soever the Magistrats received They Immediatly dissmissed the rable and Tumult with alse much ease and readiness as they could have Sent away one of their own Servants which does plainely evince that the forsaid Tumult and rable was alse much under the dispossall and directione of the Magistrates As if they hade acted all they did by their express authority and Command But dismissing the prisioners Neither the4 tacksmen nor his Majesties Collectors Could have any Justice done them either for the excise or for the above wrongs they hade suffered Bot after all the violence and affronts done them were forced to leave the place By all which it is evident That the haill forsaid persones and alse the saids Magistrats and all or each of them are guilty as actors airt and part of the forsaid unlawfull Convocatione and Tumult, And of the forsaid violence and other Crymes Lybelled Which being duely proven They and each of them Ought to be decerned in the Somme of […] for the Suspenders damnadges And also ought to be farder punished in their persones and goods by Decreit of the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill To the example and terror of others to Committ the Like in time comeing And Anent the Charge given to the fornamed persones defenders To have Compeared personally before the saids Lords of his Majesties privy Councill at ane Certain day now bygone To have answered to the grounds of the abovewrittin Complaint And to have heard and seen such Order and Course taken theranent as appertaines As the said Lybell and executiones therof at more Length is Contained; And Alse Anent the5 Lybell or Letters of Reconventione raised at the instance of Thomas Mitchell provest of Aberdeen Alexander Ragg Alexander Forbes, Alexander Kerr and Alexander Pattoune baillies of the said burgh of Aberdeen with Concourse of Sir James Stewart his majesties advocat for his highnes intrest in the matter under-wryten Makeing Mention, That wher the violent invadeing of his Majesties free Leidges, The Masterfull oppressing of them in their houses the takeing away their goods and assaulting their persones With such violence as to raise tumult with the Murrmuring of Judges and Magistrates and the raiseing false and injurious Lybells against them By the Lawes of this and all other weell governed nationes Are Crymes of ane high nature And Severly punishable, Yet nevertheless William Cochran of Ferguslie James Dunlope of Househill John Reid Walter Elison James Murove George Porteous, Alexander Cruikshank Collin Southerland Souldiers in Captain Straittoune elder his Company in Collonell Rowes regiment William Raitt James Neilsone John Gow John Cameron John Grant William Corbet Souldiers in Livetenent Collonell Dalyells Company John Turrens John Baird John Wood John Martine John Grubb and Daniall Southerland and others their accomplices in manifast Contempt of his Majesties Lawes and authority upon one or other of the dayes of November Last by past came to Aberdeen and ther the said James Dunlape upon pretence that in any of the inhabitants lyable for the excise of their brewing preceiding march Jaj vic nyntie Eight, and that he hade obtained decreets against Severalls of the Inhabitants tho these decreets were in absence Long after the expyreing of his tack for two hundred Gallons against each defender without regaird to the proportiones of their browing, yet upon these decreets the said James Dunlope procure parties of his Majesties forces to be sent to the toune of Aberdeen And being arryved without any application to the Commissioners of Supply the Said Souldiers were quartered upon severalls of the inhabitants as the said James Dunlope thought fitt, And being quartered upon the inhabitants Comitted all maner of disorder, such as the beatting of their persones seasing of their goods on the pretence of poynding and the Chaseing them throw the Streets and feilds with drawen Swords and Bagganots, And when they were asked what they designed to doe, They answered they were come to poynd them because they were villains and knaves etc And which practises and disorders were increased and Augmented upon the aryveall of the said William Cochran of Ferguslie with more Souldiers untill by these practises The unwary Multitude were so farr inradged that they rose in a Tumultery and Illegall way and att their own hands pretended to revenge themselves of the saids defenders Insulting, and Contemned the saids Magistrats pursuers who interposed with all Caution and Sincerity to Compress the said Tumult, and after the same was in some measure appeased and the defenders hade reteired yet the humor of the inraged multitude Occassioned by the forsaid Illegall practises did Continue and was Like to have disturbed the queit and setlement of the burgh To the Contempt of all Magistracy and Government And Notwithstanding that the ruid treatment the defenders hade mett with from the Rable was intirely the effect of their oun evill conduct and wherin the said pursuers shared yet more then they, The defenders did raise amost groundless Lybell against the pursuers takeing for pretence of their Malice that they hade gone to recover the excise from the brewars at Aberdeen Conforme to Decreets obtained in March and Aprill And hade taken a party of Souldiers with them which were quartered upon Some of the deficients And hade taken severall poynds out of their housses accordingly to Laud altho indeed the defenders were guiltie of Supine Negligence if their hade been any excyse due to have been so long of ingathering of it nor is it easie to be beleived that they did want their money so long And the quartering and poynding was most Illegall As has been already said, And in Like maner the saids defenders did Calumneously accuse the pursuers for Convocating ther Mobb albeit they themselves were truly the Occasione of it And haveing been heard say that the brewars were Insolent they would take their soulls out of their broad sides (or some such unchristian expressiones) if that would make them money And the saids defenders did most Calumneously Lybell That haveing applyed to the pursuers for assistance to put the decreets in executione They did refuse And one of the persones Lyable haveing been seazed and Caried to the Towne Councill house The pursuers being requyred to Imprisone him Shifted, And the rable being thus incouradged by them under hand, The said William Cochran one of the defenders was forced to requyre them to interpose their authority in Conjunctione with Seaverall gentlemen Bot least the presence of a magistrat might fright the rable one of the Baillies who was present withdrew Wherby the rable was incouradged to become more insolent; And which assertiones are not only groundles Bot even Contrary to treuth Seing the pursuers did most willingly Concurr upon all occasiones as oft was requyred, and particularly when one of the Baillies was requyred by Ferguslie to Imprisone one of the debtors who is falsely said to have been to the Councill house tho keept in a Taverne The said Baillie did most readily Comply and would have put him in prisone And for that effect hade already sent for the Jaylor, Bot Ferguslie upon the first appearance of Stirr in the Towne plainly out of Faintheartedness sent his own Servant to dissmiss the prisoner, nor was the prisoner ever presented to the pursuer As he ought to have been, Bot Fergusly Contented himself to tell that he hade him in a Tavern hard6 by, And as to the other instance that the said Baillie retired when he was requyred to Concurr and assist against the rable It is not only Calumnious, Bot it is most Certaine, that the said Baillie brought more assistance and exposed himself And Baillie Patton another of the pursuers for rescueing the defenders at another time The same Baillie in presence of Househill went and Laid hands upon ane of the most forward of the rable, And he and his officers being so ingadged The saids defenders went oft very fairly and left the said Baillie in the hands of the rable, and the officer was beatten and wounded, And the said defenders are most injurious as weell as ingrate to have brought the pursuers in as pairtners for whom they Ought raither to have been witnesses of their fidelity and firmnes, And the defenders ought in Justice to have acknowledged that the pursuers did most exactly ther dutie both haveing Imprisoned severall of the deficients ane account of their excise and Likewayes Some of the most forward of the rable And in these Circumstances It is evident That the Suspenders could doe no more, And Wheras the said Lybell at the instance of the defenders does farder wickedly bear That Foveraigne haveing gone from the defenders when they were besett with the rable That the pursuers might Suppress the Tumult and protect the defenders The pursuers Declared they would not interpose unless the defenders granted a warrand to sett the prisoners at Libertie And sent their Fiscall to intimat their said Overture, Which warrand the defenders being forced to grant, And they haveing accordingly sett at Libertie the prisoners, The pursuers Dispersed the rable with as much ease as they could have sent away their own Servants Which say the defenders was ane evidence of the pursuers power and intrest with the rable, And this alleadgance is of a peice with all the rest, For the trueth is, the pursuers were most unwilling to Inervate publict discipline would by no means Consent to the Liberating prisoners Altho they were often Solicite to it by the defenders untill at Last they sent that very Fiscall (who is Fiscall to the Shirriff Court) and who the defenders have cited as a party That he might not be a witnes altho they Lybelled nothing against him to Signifie to the pursuers that unless they dismissed the prisoners they would be guilty of the defenders blood, and of all the disorders that therafter would follow, And upon these repeited requeists And not Otherwayes they did Condescend Which allwayes they were Resolved not to have done altho at that time they were Surrounded with a rable and the house wher they were in assaulted, And the pursuers were so farr from haveing intrest with the rable, That after the defenders were gone from the toune they did of new Insult them, and they did after wards to Signifie their detastatione of that muttinous way Imprisone and prosecute Severall of the Ringleaders in that disturbance And indeed the defenders Ought by no means to have accused the pursuers Seing their ill Conduct hade drawen on the disorder And their timerousness and Importunity did increase it almost to the utter confusion and overthrow of the burgh, when the pursuers would have Stood firme and brought the Muttiners to reasone, and upon the whole matter ther could be nothing done more tenderly for the defenders nor more Cautiously upon the pursuers part then what the pursuers did, And by all which as is above represented, The defenders are guilty airt and pairt of the Crymes above lybelled and ought to be decerned to repair the pursuers damnadges and expensses to Fyve Thousand pounds Scots, And otherwayes punished in their persones and goods to the terror of others to committ the Like in time in time comeing And Anent the Charge given to the saids defenders To have Compeared personally before the saids Lords at ane Certaine day now bygone To have answered to the grounds of the forsaid Complaint And to have heard and seen such order and Course taken theranent as appertaines As in the forsaid Lybell of Reconventione and executiones therof at more Length is Contained Which principall Lybell more Length is Contained Which principall Lybell abovewryten raised at the instance of the above James Dunlope William Campbell and Serjant Cruikshank Against John Greig baxter in Aberdeen and the Magistrats and others of the said burgh Being upon the Eight of February Last by past Called in presence of the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill, And the haill pursuers Compearing personally with Sir Patrick Home Mr John Fergusone Mr William Carmicheall and Mr Walter Stewart their advocats, And George Cuming Sone to William Cuming Merchant in Aberdeen, James Clerk George Pattoune Androw Fergusone James Johnstone Thomas Mitchell provest Alexander Forbes and Alexander Pattoune Baillies of the said burgh defenders Compearing personally, and the remanent defenders being all Lawfullie Summoned oft times called and not Compearing, And Mr David Dalrymple, Mr Robert Forbes and Mr William Black Compearing as advocats for the haill defenders The Lybell and answers made therto by the magistrats of Aberdeen read and both parties Lawiers fully heard The saids Lords doe hereby Grant Certificatione against the haill defenders Ragg and Alexander Pattone baillies The said provest and the two other Baillies who are Compearing allwayes Inacting themselves in the books of his majesties privy Councill for the two Baillies not Compearing as said is, That they shall obtempor and fullfill the Sentance of Councill to be given and pronunced against them in this matter And alse excepts from the said Certificatione Walter Robisone of Dariot and James Smith Black Smith in Aberdeen In respect of their infirmity and age, And the haill witnesses being called for and only John Gallon younger haveing appeared and made faith, The saids Lords Grants farder dilligence by Caption against the haill absent witnesses called for and not Compearing untill the d[…] day of […] And in the mean time Nominats and appoints the Earles of Marr and Lowdon The Lords Jedburgh and Boyle The Lord Phesdoe and Sir Robert Sinclar of Ativensone to be a Committie to call for and examine the witnesses and declaired any thrie of the said Committie to be a Sufficient quorum And Recommended to them to mett the morrow therafter at thrie of the Cloak in the afternoon, And the saids Lords Declared that they would not advyse the probatione to be adduced in this proces untill the magistrats of Aberdeen hade a Competent time for adduceing the probatione in their reconventione That the probatione of both processes might be advised Simul et Semeit And Reserved all Objectiones That might be made against the witnesses to be proponed and discussed before the said Committie And Therafter the forsaid Lybell of Reconventione at the instance of the saids magistrats of Aberdeen against the said James Dunlope of Househill and William Cochran of Ferguslie Being upon the Twentie day of the said moneth of February Last by past Called in presence of the saids Lords of his Majesties privy Councill And the provest of Aberdeen and Baillies Forbes and Patton thrie of the pursuars Compearing personally With Mr David Dalrymple Mr Robert Forbes senior and Mr William Black their advocats And the saids two defenders Compearing personally With Sir Patrick Home his majesties Solicitor and Mr John Fergusone their advoats The lybell being read and both parties Lawiers fully heard, The saids Lords addmitts the lybell to the pursuers their probatione, and the witnessess present haveing made faith at the barr as marked in the roll The saids Lords Nominated and appointed the Committie formerly appointed in the principall Lybell at the defenders instance against thir purswers and added therto the Viscount of Tarbatt Lord Montgomry Lord Ruthven and the present Lord provest of Edinburgh to the former Committie And Declared them to be a Committie both in the principall Lybell and in the reconventione And Declared any thrie of them to be a Sufficient quorum, And Recomended to them to meet the morrow at ten in the forenoon Reserving all objectiones Which be made against the said witnesses to be proponed and discust before the said Committie And Granted farder dilligence by Caption against the absent witnesses against the […] day of […] And accordingly both the pursuers in the principall Lybell, and Lybell of Reconventione haveing adduced diverse and Sundrie famous witnesses for proveing their respective Lybells Who being all Solemnly Sworne purged of partiall Councill Examined and Interogate Deponed and Declared in maner mentioned in their respective oathes and depositiones as the samen extent in process bears, And The said Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Haveing this day Considered the depositiones of the witnesses adduced in both the saids processes with the haill Stepps of both processes The saids Lords Finds the ponts and articles of neither of the saids Lybells in the respective processes sufficiently verified or proven And Therfore Have Assoylzied and hereby Assoylies both parties from the points and articles of the respective Lybells raised against them and wherin they are called as defenders and Declaires them quyt therof and free therfrae in all time comeing.

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem

D1700/3/111

Decreet

Decreit absolvitor Dunlope and others Taxsmen of excyse Against The Magistrats of Aberdeen et e contra

Anent the Lybell or Letters of Complaint raised and pursued before the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill at the Instance of James Dunlope of Househill for himself and as one of the Tacksmen of the six peny excyse from the first of March Jaj vic nyntie Eight And William Campbell one of his Majesties troop of guards who by order of the Earle of Argyll Commanded a partie of Collonell Rowes Regiment sent to quarter for deficiency in the Town of Aberdeen and […] Cruickshank Serjant in the said Regiment with Concourse of Sir James Stewart his majesties advocat for his highnes in trust in the matter underwrittin Makeing Mentione That wher all riysing in armes and unlawfull Convocations of any of his majesties Leidges especially within burgh to hinder and Obstruct the executione of his majesties Lawes and Sentence of Lawfull Judicatories for raising and ingathering of the excyse or any other part of his Majesties publict revenue by the fermers and tacksmen therof, or these Imployed under them, and the assaulting or attacking of their persones invadeing their houses wher they are leidged and attempting to burne the Same, And Wounding their Land Lords for harbouring and resetting of them, And the breaking open of prisones and Carieing away of goods Lawfullie poynded for payment of his Majesties revenues and disposeing therof at their pleasure, or the beatting of the persones of Souldiers Imployed in quartering for excyse upon deficients and breaking of their armes, as also for the Magistrats of burghs to Contrive at incouradge and Foster such unlawfull convocationes and to refuse to Suppress rableing and Tumults raised and made within burgh And to concurr in extorting warrands under the hands of the farmers of his Majesties excyse or any of the mto dismiss and sett at Libertie persones duely Committed to prisons for debts due to his Majesties or for being accessory to or concerned in Tumultuous Convocation or rableing within their burghs and their refuseing to put in executione the decreets and Sentances against these lyable in payment of the excyse due to his Majestie within the said burgh or not to protect assist and defend these of his Majesties forces Imployed Conforme to Law to quarter upon deficients within their burgh are all Crymes of ane high Nature and by the Lawes of this and all other weell governed nationes Especially when done in the open day, And the saids acts of Tumult and unlawfull convocatione in armes are persisted and Continued in for Severall dayes after others Ought to be Severly punished Nevertheless It is of verity that the brewars of the burgh of Aberdeen haveing the time of the forsaid tack partly made no entries and partly made Short entries The forsaids Tacksmen were Necessitate In the Moneths of March and Aprill Last to Conveen the saids brewars before the baillies of the said burgh and to referr the quantities browen by them and of their concealled Liquors to their oathes Wherupon albeit they did Compear, yet refuseing to give their oathes theranent They and each of them were holden as confest for their respective quantities Lybelled against them and the decreets past therupon, accordingly Bot the brewars persisting in their Contumacy The Tacksmen after long patience were necessitat to send a partie of Souldiers under the Command of the said William Campbell, and by order abovementioned to quarter upon the deficients within the said burgh upon the Twentie two of November Last or one or other of the dayes of the said moneth, The Commander of the said partie haveing quartered upon some of the deficients, and taken some poynds out of Severalls of their housses Conforme to the method and order prescrybed by diverse Lawes and acts of parliament made theranent, The saids persones poynded and […] Archibald sone to John Archibald in Aberdeen, John Craig baxter William Troop Merchant ther, John Buchan baxter ther, John Wright merchant Alexander Gibb Cordinar and his servant, Adam Lyell servitor to Collonell Buchan Alexander Brans Flesher, William Lorimer baxter John Cushney merchant, George Cumming sone to William Cumming merchant James Ross maltman George Taylor ther, William Burnet Merchant William Stewart Weaver John Clerk Cuttler and […] Cutler his brother James Robison Carpenter, Thomas Walker baxter, Alexander Ross flesher James Smith blacksmith and his Stepsone and Servants, Alexander Duff baxter William Spence hooker James Ritchie servant to Mary Ogilvie and John Gellon flesher, George Patton Laird of Grandhome James Clerk Cuttler and […] Maitland Waitter in Aberdeen James Hoge Maltman James Buchan baxter, Abram Thomsone merchant Adam Mark wright […] Strachan Servitor to William Cook Patrick Meldrum servitor to John Findlay John Scot prentise to James Douglas, Alexander Aberdeen Couper Baillie Robertsone Maltman […] Cook son to William Cook David Jack Weaver, Androw Fergusone Robert Smith Deacon of the Taylors Issobell Innes representative of Bessie Lawson Mary More spouse to George Robertsone bellman Jean Gordon spouse to William Jaffrey horss hyrer Issobell Issobell2 Naughty servant to John Burnet Robert Pope servant to George Ross Pentherer, Alexander Painer and […] his sposue James Johnstone Litster Mr Alexander Lessly Fisscall and John Lessly Late Conveener all in Aberdeen Shaking off all fear of God and regaird to the Lawes and acts of parliament made either for the Security of the peace or orderly payment of his majesties revenue, Bot in Insolent and open Contempt of the Same did Convocat assemble and draw togither the haill Comonality and mobb of the Towne of Aberdeen armed with Swords Guns halbarts Durks and Baganots and other weapons invasive upon the evening of the forsaid day in Severall Companies under Sillence and Cloud night did with great tumult threaten and with violence break into severall houses Searching for and Stryveing to apprehend the said James Dunlope and of his Majesties tacksmen of the excuse And who hade the direction of the party quartering upon the deficients, Threatening to kill murder and assissinat him, And particularly they brock into the house of John Stewart Collector of the excise at that place appointed by the Taxsmen, And after hewing down his portall door brock into his house violently brusting open the door of every roome therin And after nearow Search throw out every Corner of the house Stabbed the bedds with Swords and Bagganets to discover if he was Lurking ther, And Cutt and wounded the Said John Stewart Land Lord of the house for harbouring and absconding the Said James Dunlope, And to such height of Insulting insolencie did this rable and tumult proceed into That they took the boldness to fire severall Musket Shotts into the said John Stewarts brewhouse of Sett purpose and designe to sett the Cumbustible matter therin in fire therby to burne and Consume in the flames the said John Stewarts dwalling house adjacent therto In prosecution of their malicious and furious threatenings And which hade Certainly taken effect And come to apss, If it hade not been prevented by the vigerous industrie of the said John Stewarts Servants, and not resting here they had the Impudence to attack and seaze upo nthe partie of his Majesties Souldiers dispersed in their severall quarters, And to carie off Break and distroy their armes Tear and distroy his Majesties Cloathing wherwith they were appearalled with great indignity and dispite, and therafter violently brock open the housses and seller doors wher the poynded goods were laid up and after Beatting and abuseing his majesties Souldiers for offering to preserve the poinds They violently and Masterfully caried away both the Souldiers armes and the poynded goods to the Trades hall And Continued ther rageing violence up and down the toune till two of the Cloak in the Morning over the tacksmen and Souldiers whom they hade rabled beatten and abused in maner forsaid, And Farder William Cochran of Ferguslie another of the Tacksmen Aryveing at the said burgh of Aberdeen upon the twenty fifth day of the said moneth of November Did Immediatly apply to the Magistrats for their assistance in puting the Decreets against deficients in executione And for protecting and Supporting the partie of his Majesties Souldiers Imployed for Supporting and assisting the legall execution against the brewars for the deficient excise Bot so farr were the saids Magistrats viz […]3 Mitchell provest of Aberdeen […] Ragg […] Forbes […] Kerr and […] Pattoune Baillies of the said burgh from performing their dutie in the said matter That when the saids Tacksmen and partie of Souldiers forsaid hade legally apprehended one of the deficient brewars and caried him to the toune Councill house Requyreing the Magistrates to Committ and detaine him prisoner Conforme to Law They the saids magistrats in Manifast Neglect of their dutie and by avowed Connivance and incouradgment to the rable againe to assemble in armes and Shift and refuse to Committ the said deficient brewary prisoner for his excise by the Space of severall hours Upon a Shame pretence that the Goyaller could not be hade and after the forsaid rable and Comonality hade been this incouradged and fostered by the Connivance and underhand incouradgment from the saids Magistrates the said William Cochran pursuer perceiveing the Rable allong the Street Requyred the Magistrates in presence of severall Gentlmen to use and interpose their authority for preserveing the pace in Suppressing and quasieing the forsaid tumult and in Lawfull Convocatione and protecting the saids Tacksmen pursuers and took […] Ane of the Baillies by the hand intreating him to Stay and Joyne with the Taxsmen pursuers and severall other gentlmen then present on the street for that effect Bot least the presence of a Magistrat might have discouradged and dispersed the said Rable, The said baillie did thrust himself out of the said William Cochrans hand and he with the rest of the magistrats Did reteir off the Streets and abscond themselves to the effect the rable might insult the tacksmen and Committ other disorders at their pleasure, And accordingly the saids defenders did with the rest of the rable in a most furious and tumultary maner attack the said James Dunlope upon the Streets With Swords Guns and halberts With Manifast designe to murder and assissinat him upon the place as they would have done if hade not been Surrounded and defended by Forbes of Foveraigne and Severall other Gentlmen, Who Committed the said James Dunlope and William Cochran to the house of the said Forbes of Foveraigne in the toune of Aberdeen for their security, The said defenders and their said rable haveing in the mean time marched in a most arrogant and insulting Maner in open day about two of the Cloak in the afternoon upon the said twentie Eight day of November or ane or other of the dayes of the said moneth to the Tolbooth of the said burgh of Aberdeen to break open the prisone doors for rescueing the prisoners detained therin, Bot Immediatly they with four or fyve hundred of their rable did Surround and Incompase the said Forbes of Foveraigne his dwalling house demanding the said James Dunlope and William Cochran That they might Dewite and dispatch them And by no intreaty of Foveraine and other gentlemen could be diswaded from such a villainous attempt, Threatening to burne the house about their ears if his Majesties saids tacksmen were not delyvered up tothem and which wicked interprize They hade certainly accomplished If Foveraigne goeing to the magistrats by a backway and acquainting them with the great danger and distress the Taxsmen were in by the fury and violence of the rable hade not prevailled with the said rable for some delay to the executione of their fury Bot so farr were the Magistrats from doeing their dutie In Suppressing the rable and protecting his majesties said tacksmen That as ane incitement and incouradgment to the rable they expressly declared they would not concerne themselves nor interpose in the matter Unless his Majesties tacksmen would give a positive Order under their hand to dismiss and sett at Libertie Such persones as wes prisoners either for the former tumult or deficiencie of excise and sent their Fiscall openly to intimat the Samen Wherupon his Majesties tacksmen were Constrained to grant warrand for setting at Libertie Such of the prisoners as the magistrate pleased Bot this being refused they were forced foir delyvering themselves from the present Imment danger to grant a positive order to sett all the prisoners at Libertie Which how Soon Soever the Magistrats received They Immediatly dissmissed the rable and Tumult with alse much ease and readiness as they could have Sent away one of their own Servants which does plainely evince that the forsaid Tumult and rable was alse much under the dispossall and directione of the Magistrates As if they hade acted all they did by their express authority and Command But dismissing the prisioners Neither the4 tacksmen nor his Majesties Collectors Could have any Justice done them either for the excise or for the above wrongs they hade suffered Bot after all the violence and affronts done them were forced to leave the place By all which it is evident That the haill forsaid persones and alse the saids Magistrats and all or each of them are guilty as actors airt and part of the forsaid unlawfull Convocatione and Tumult, And of the forsaid violence and other Crymes Lybelled Which being duely proven They and each of them Ought to be decerned in the Somme of […] for the Suspenders damnadges And also ought to be farder punished in their persones and goods by Decreit of the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill To the example and terror of others to Committ the Like in time comeing And Anent the Charge given to the fornamed persones defenders To have Compeared personally before the saids Lords of his Majesties privy Councill at ane Certain day now bygone To have answered to the grounds of the abovewrittin Complaint And to have heard and seen such Order and Course taken theranent as appertaines As the said Lybell and executiones therof at more Length is Contained; And Alse Anent the5 Lybell or Letters of Reconventione raised at the instance of Thomas Mitchell provest of Aberdeen Alexander Ragg Alexander Forbes, Alexander Kerr and Alexander Pattoune baillies of the said burgh of Aberdeen with Concourse of Sir James Stewart his majesties advocat for his highnes intrest in the matter under-wryten Makeing Mention, That wher the violent invadeing of his Majesties free Leidges, The Masterfull oppressing of them in their houses the takeing away their goods and assaulting their persones With such violence as to raise tumult with the Murrmuring of Judges and Magistrates and the raiseing false and injurious Lybells against them By the Lawes of this and all other weell governed nationes Are Crymes of ane high nature And Severly punishable, Yet nevertheless William Cochran of Ferguslie James Dunlope of Househill John Reid Walter Elison James Murove George Porteous, Alexander Cruikshank Collin Southerland Souldiers in Captain Straittoune elder his Company in Collonell Rowes regiment William Raitt James Neilsone John Gow John Cameron John Grant William Corbet Souldiers in Livetenent Collonell Dalyells Company John Turrens John Baird John Wood John Martine John Grubb and Daniall Southerland and others their accomplices in manifast Contempt of his Majesties Lawes and authority upon one or other of the dayes of November Last by past came to Aberdeen and ther the said James Dunlape upon pretence that in any of the inhabitants lyable for the excise of their brewing preceiding march Jaj vic nyntie Eight, and that he hade obtained decreets against Severalls of the Inhabitants tho these decreets were in absence Long after the expyreing of his tack for two hundred Gallons against each defender without regaird to the proportiones of their browing, yet upon these decreets the said James Dunlope procure parties of his Majesties forces to be sent to the toune of Aberdeen And being arryved without any application to the Commissioners of Supply the Said Souldiers were quartered upon severalls of the inhabitants as the said James Dunlope thought fitt, And being quartered upon the inhabitants Comitted all maner of disorder, such as the beatting of their persones seasing of their goods on the pretence of poynding and the Chaseing them throw the Streets and feilds with drawen Swords and Bagganots, And when they were asked what they designed to doe, They answered they were come to poynd them because they were villains and knaves etc And which practises and disorders were increased and Augmented upon the aryveall of the said William Cochran of Ferguslie with more Souldiers untill by these practises The unwary Multitude were so farr inradged that they rose in a Tumultery and Illegall way and att their own hands pretended to revenge themselves of the saids defenders Insulting, and Contemned the saids Magistrats pursuers who interposed with all Caution and Sincerity to Compress the said Tumult, and after the same was in some measure appeased and the defenders hade reteired yet the humor of the inraged multitude Occassioned by the forsaid Illegall practises did Continue and was Like to have disturbed the queit and setlement of the burgh To the Contempt of all Magistracy and Government And Notwithstanding that the ruid treatment the defenders hade mett with from the Rable was intirely the effect of their oun evill conduct and wherin the said pursuers shared yet more then they, The defenders did raise amost groundless Lybell against the pursuers takeing for pretence of their Malice that they hade gone to recover the excise from the brewars at Aberdeen Conforme to Decreets obtained in March and Aprill And hade taken a party of Souldiers with them which were quartered upon Some of the deficients And hade taken severall poynds out of their housses accordingly to Laud altho indeed the defenders were guiltie of Supine Negligence if their hade been any excyse due to have been so long of ingathering of it nor is it easie to be beleived that they did want their money so long And the quartering and poynding was most Illegall As has been already said, And in Like maner the saids defenders did Calumneously accuse the pursuers for Convocating ther Mobb albeit they themselves were truly the Occasione of it And haveing been heard say that the brewars were Insolent they would take their soulls out of their broad sides (or some such unchristian expressiones) if that would make them money And the saids defenders did most Calumneously Lybell That haveing applyed to the pursuers for assistance to put the decreets in executione They did refuse And one of the persones Lyable haveing been seazed and Caried to the Towne Councill house The pursuers being requyred to Imprisone him Shifted, And the rable being thus incouradged by them under hand, The said William Cochran one of the defenders was forced to requyre them to interpose their authority in Conjunctione with Seaverall gentlemen Bot least the presence of a magistrat might fright the rable one of the Baillies who was present withdrew Wherby the rable was incouradged to become more insolent; And which assertiones are not only groundles Bot even Contrary to treuth Seing the pursuers did most willingly Concurr upon all occasiones as oft was requyred, and particularly when one of the Baillies was requyred by Ferguslie to Imprisone one of the debtors who is falsely said to have been to the Councill house tho keept in a Taverne The said Baillie did most readily Comply and would have put him in prisone And for that effect hade already sent for the Jaylor, Bot Ferguslie upon the first appearance of Stirr in the Towne plainly out of Faintheartedness sent his own Servant to dissmiss the prisoner, nor was the prisoner ever presented to the pursuer As he ought to have been, Bot Fergusly Contented himself to tell that he hade him in a Tavern hard6 by, And as to the other instance that the said Baillie retired when he was requyred to Concurr and assist against the rable It is not only Calumnious, Bot it is most Certaine, that the said Baillie brought more assistance and exposed himself And Baillie Patton another of the pursuers for rescueing the defenders at another time The same Baillie in presence of Househill went and Laid hands upon ane of the most forward of the rable, And he and his officers being so ingadged The saids defenders went oft very fairly and left the said Baillie in the hands of the rable, and the officer was beatten and wounded, And the said defenders are most injurious as weell as ingrate to have brought the pursuers in as pairtners for whom they Ought raither to have been witnesses of their fidelity and firmnes, And the defenders ought in Justice to have acknowledged that the pursuers did most exactly ther dutie both haveing Imprisoned severall of the deficients ane account of their excise and Likewayes Some of the most forward of the rable And in these Circumstances It is evident That the Suspenders could doe no more, And Wheras the said Lybell at the instance of the defenders does farder wickedly bear That Foveraigne haveing gone from the defenders when they were besett with the rable That the pursuers might Suppress the Tumult and protect the defenders The pursuers Declared they would not interpose unless the defenders granted a warrand to sett the prisoners at Libertie And sent their Fiscall to intimat their said Overture, Which warrand the defenders being forced to grant, And they haveing accordingly sett at Libertie the prisoners, The pursuers Dispersed the rable with as much ease as they could have sent away their own Servants Which say the defenders was ane evidence of the pursuers power and intrest with the rable, And this alleadgance is of a peice with all the rest, For the trueth is, the pursuers were most unwilling to Inervate publict discipline would by no means Consent to the Liberating prisoners Altho they were often Solicite to it by the defenders untill at Last they sent that very Fiscall (who is Fiscall to the Shirriff Court) and who the defenders have cited as a party That he might not be a witnes altho they Lybelled nothing against him to Signifie to the pursuers that unless they dismissed the prisoners they would be guilty of the defenders blood, and of all the disorders that therafter would follow, And upon these repeited requeists And not Otherwayes they did Condescend Which allwayes they were Resolved not to have done altho at that time they were Surrounded with a rable and the house wher they were in assaulted, And the pursuers were so farr from haveing intrest with the rable, That after the defenders were gone from the toune they did of new Insult them, and they did after wards to Signifie their detastatione of that muttinous way Imprisone and prosecute Severall of the Ringleaders in that disturbance And indeed the defenders Ought by no means to have accused the pursuers Seing their ill Conduct hade drawen on the disorder And their timerousness and Importunity did increase it almost to the utter confusion and overthrow of the burgh, when the pursuers would have Stood firme and brought the Muttiners to reasone, and upon the whole matter ther could be nothing done more tenderly for the defenders nor more Cautiously upon the pursuers part then what the pursuers did, And by all which as is above represented, The defenders are guilty airt and pairt of the Crymes above lybelled and ought to be decerned to repair the pursuers damnadges and expensses to Fyve Thousand pounds Scots, And otherwayes punished in their persones and goods to the terror of others to committ the Like in time in time comeing And Anent the Charge given to the saids defenders To have Compeared personally before the saids Lords at ane Certaine day now bygone To have answered to the grounds of the forsaid Complaint And to have heard and seen such order and Course taken theranent as appertaines As in the forsaid Lybell of Reconventione and executiones therof at more Length is Contained Which principall Lybell more Length is Contained Which principall Lybell abovewryten raised at the instance of the above James Dunlope William Campbell and Serjant Cruikshank Against John Greig baxter in Aberdeen and the Magistrats and others of the said burgh Being upon the Eight of February Last by past Called in presence of the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill, And the haill pursuers Compearing personally with Sir Patrick Home Mr John Fergusone Mr William Carmicheall and Mr Walter Stewart their advocats, And George Cuming Sone to William Cuming Merchant in Aberdeen, James Clerk George Pattoune Androw Fergusone James Johnstone Thomas Mitchell provest Alexander Forbes and Alexander Pattoune Baillies of the said burgh defenders Compearing personally, and the remanent defenders being all Lawfullie Summoned oft times called and not Compearing, And Mr David Dalrymple, Mr Robert Forbes and Mr William Black Compearing as advocats for the haill defenders The Lybell and answers made therto by the magistrats of Aberdeen read and both parties Lawiers fully heard The saids Lords doe hereby Grant Certificatione against the haill defenders Ragg and Alexander Pattone baillies The said provest and the two other Baillies who are Compearing allwayes Inacting themselves in the books of his majesties privy Councill for the two Baillies not Compearing as said is, That they shall obtempor and fullfill the Sentance of Councill to be given and pronunced against them in this matter And alse excepts from the said Certificatione Walter Robisone of Dariot and James Smith Black Smith in Aberdeen In respect of their infirmity and age, And the haill witnesses being called for and only John Gallon younger haveing appeared and made faith, The saids Lords Grants farder dilligence by Caption against the haill absent witnesses called for and not Compearing untill the d[…] day of […] And in the mean time Nominats and appoints the Earles of Marr and Lowdon The Lords Jedburgh and Boyle The Lord Phesdoe and Sir Robert Sinclar of Ativensone to be a Committie to call for and examine the witnesses and declaired any thrie of the said Committie to be a Sufficient quorum And Recommended to them to mett the morrow therafter at thrie of the Cloak in the afternoon, And the saids Lords Declared that they would not advyse the probatione to be adduced in this proces untill the magistrats of Aberdeen hade a Competent time for adduceing the probatione in their reconventione That the probatione of both processes might be advised Simul et Semeit And Reserved all Objectiones That might be made against the witnesses to be proponed and discussed before the said Committie And Therafter the forsaid Lybell of Reconventione at the instance of the saids magistrats of Aberdeen against the said James Dunlope of Househill and William Cochran of Ferguslie Being upon the Twentie day of the said moneth of February Last by past Called in presence of the saids Lords of his Majesties privy Councill And the provest of Aberdeen and Baillies Forbes and Patton thrie of the pursuars Compearing personally With Mr David Dalrymple Mr Robert Forbes senior and Mr William Black their advocats And the saids two defenders Compearing personally With Sir Patrick Home his majesties Solicitor and Mr John Fergusone their advoats The lybell being read and both parties Lawiers fully heard, The saids Lords addmitts the lybell to the pursuers their probatione, and the witnessess present haveing made faith at the barr as marked in the roll The saids Lords Nominated and appointed the Committie formerly appointed in the principall Lybell at the defenders instance against thir purswers and added therto the Viscount of Tarbatt Lord Montgomry Lord Ruthven and the present Lord provest of Edinburgh to the former Committie And Declared them to be a Committie both in the principall Lybell and in the reconventione And Declared any thrie of them to be a Sufficient quorum, And Recomended to them to meet the morrow at ten in the forenoon Reserving all objectiones Which be made against the said witnesses to be proponed and discust before the said Committie And Granted farder dilligence by Caption against the absent witnesses against the […] day of […] And accordingly both the pursuers in the principall Lybell, and Lybell of Reconventione haveing adduced diverse and Sundrie famous witnesses for proveing their respective Lybells Who being all Solemnly Sworne purged of partiall Councill Examined and Interogate Deponed and Declared in maner mentioned in their respective oathes and depositiones as the samen extent in process bears, And The said Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Haveing this day Considered the depositiones of the witnesses adduced in both the saids processes with the haill Stepps of both processes The saids Lords Finds the ponts and articles of neither of the saids Lybells in the respective processes sufficiently verified or proven And Therfore Have Assoylzied and hereby Assoylies both parties from the points and articles of the respective Lybells raised against them and wherin they are called as defenders and Declaires them quyt therof and free therfrae in all time comeing.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 323v-332v.

2. Sic.

3. A mark appears on here, most likely the start of a letter.

4. The word ‘petitioners’ has been blotted or erased from the page here.

5. The word ‘forsaid’ scored out here.

6. An illegible, scored out insertion occurs here between words.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 323v-332v.

2. Sic.

3. A mark appears on here, most likely the start of a letter.

4. The word ‘petitioners’ has been blotted or erased from the page here.

5. The word ‘forsaid’ scored out here.

6. An illegible, scored out insertion occurs here between words.

Act, 14 March 1700 (pm), Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem

D1700/3/101

Act

Act The Magistrats of Pearth Against John Neice2 in Couper and others

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be Patrick Davidsone present provest of Pearth for himself and in name of the Magistrats of the said burgh Shewing That the saids Lords by their Ordinarie upon the Sixth of this instant haveing appointed the petitioners and Mr John Ogilvie Baillie of the Toun of Couper to Submitt the Muttuall processes depending betwixt them To the Right honorable the Earle of Leven, The Lord Justice Clerk and Mr Francis Montgomry and to examine witnesses in the said matter if they Saw Cause, and therupon finally to determine and deside in the said processes As they should think Just, In obedience and Complyance with the said Ordinance of the saids Lords The petitioners Caused draw up and Subscrybe a Submission and presented and offered the same to the said Mr John Ogilvie to have been subscrybed by him to the effect the same might have been accepted by the saids honorable arbiters as instruments taken therupon and the said subscrybed Submission both therwith produced would testifie, yet the said Mr John Ogilvie from his Naturall Contention and Maline and of Sett purpose to detaine the petitioner and others of the magistrats here, And Likewayes to Multiplie the expences of the Toun of Pearth and to trouble many more of the inhabitatns of that burgh by bringing and detaineing them here needlessly upon pretence of being witnesses doeth Still with more Sauciness then its fitt to express to the saids Lords, Hautily refuse the obedience due to the saids Lords ordinance And Seing the petitioner and the Magistrats are therby heavily prejudged in their privat affairs And a great Loss and prejudice brought and like to be Continued in this burgh And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be pleased either to call both parties and Discharge the process hinc inde or declare the same to be deserted as no wayes Relevant Or otherwayes to proceed as may make the saids Lords Ordinance effectuall And the petitioners free from the restless Malice of the vexatious and Troublesome Baillie of the Town of Couper as the said petition bears; The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Have Declaired and hereby Declairs The process intented and pursued before their Lordships at the Instance of Henry Hardie James Austine George Wilsone Merchants in Pearth for themselves and in name and behalf of the remanent Merchants and Gildrie of the said burgh with concourse of his Majesties advocat Against John Neill John Henderson and John Cruikshanks indwaller in Couper of Angus and Mr John Ogilvie present baillie of the said burgh, And also the proces of Reconvention intended and depending before their Lordships at the instance of the said Mr John Ogilvie and others against Patrick Davidson provest of Pearth and the Baillies and Severall of the Inhabitants and Gildrie of the said burgh To be Lett fall and no farder to be insisted in by aither partie.

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem

D1700/3/101

Act

Act The Magistrats of Pearth Against John Neice2 in Couper and others

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be Patrick Davidsone present provest of Pearth for himself and in name of the Magistrats of the said burgh Shewing That the saids Lords by their Ordinarie upon the Sixth of this instant haveing appointed the petitioners and Mr John Ogilvie Baillie of the Toun of Couper to Submitt the Muttuall processes depending betwixt them To the Right honorable the Earle of Leven, The Lord Justice Clerk and Mr Francis Montgomry and to examine witnesses in the said matter if they Saw Cause, and therupon finally to determine and deside in the said processes As they should think Just, In obedience and Complyance with the said Ordinance of the saids Lords The petitioners Caused draw up and Subscrybe a Submission and presented and offered the same to the said Mr John Ogilvie to have been subscrybed by him to the effect the same might have been accepted by the saids honorable arbiters as instruments taken therupon and the said subscrybed Submission both therwith produced would testifie, yet the said Mr John Ogilvie from his Naturall Contention and Maline and of Sett purpose to detaine the petitioner and others of the magistrats here, And Likewayes to Multiplie the expences of the Toun of Pearth and to trouble many more of the inhabitatns of that burgh by bringing and detaineing them here needlessly upon pretence of being witnesses doeth Still with more Sauciness then its fitt to express to the saids Lords, Hautily refuse the obedience due to the saids Lords ordinance And Seing the petitioner and the Magistrats are therby heavily prejudged in their privat affairs And a great Loss and prejudice brought and like to be Continued in this burgh And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be pleased either to call both parties and Discharge the process hinc inde or declare the same to be deserted as no wayes Relevant Or otherwayes to proceed as may make the saids Lords Ordinance effectuall And the petitioners free from the restless Malice of the vexatious and Troublesome Baillie of the Town of Couper as the said petition bears; The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Have Declaired and hereby Declairs The process intented and pursued before their Lordships at the Instance of Henry Hardie James Austine George Wilsone Merchants in Pearth for themselves and in name and behalf of the remanent Merchants and Gildrie of the said burgh with concourse of his Majesties advocat Against John Neill John Henderson and John Cruikshanks indwaller in Couper of Angus and Mr John Ogilvie present baillie of the said burgh, And also the proces of Reconvention intended and depending before their Lordships at the instance of the said Mr John Ogilvie and others against Patrick Davidson provest of Pearth and the Baillies and Severall of the Inhabitants and Gildrie of the said burgh To be Lett fall and no farder to be insisted in by aither partie.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 322r-322v.

2. An illegible word scored out here.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 322r-322v.

2. An illegible word scored out here.

Sederunt, 14 March 1700 (pm), Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem1

D1700/3/92

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Buchan; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Forbes; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Halcraig; Lord Crossrig; Lord Phesdoe; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Lord Provest of Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteinth day of March Jaj vic years Post Meridiem1

D1700/3/92

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Buchan; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Forbes; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Halcraig; Lord Crossrig; Lord Phesdoe; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Lord Provest of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/27, 322r.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 322r.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 322r.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 322r.