Procedure: remit, 27 December 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuenty Seventh day of December Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/12/511

Procedure: remit

John Mcnaughton remitted to the Comittee anent Deserters

Anent the petitione Given in to the Lords of there majesties privie Councill be Ensigne John Mcnaughtoun prisoner in the Canongate tolbooth Shewing That whereas the saids Lords were graciously pleased to Grant a delyverance upon a petitione given in If the petitioner could find sufficient baill of Fyve Hundreth merks to Live peaceably at home with his freinds And now the petitioner haveing found one Mr John Boyll Chirurgeon and Burges of Edinburgh brother germane to the Laird of Kelburne and therefore craveing that the saids Lords would be pleased to order the Clerks to receave his baill and sett him at Liberty Recomending his house dues to the theasury He being there Lordships alimented prisoner As the said petitione bears The Saids Lords of there majesties privie Councill Haveing Considered this petition Given in to them be the above Ensigne John Mcnaughton They Remitt to the Comittee formerly appoynted anent ane other bill given in be the petitioner upon the thretteinth day of November Last with power to them as in the former reference And Remitts to the Clerks of Councill to receave such Cautione as they will be ansuerable for.

At Edinburgh 27 December 1692

A1692/12/511

Procedure: remit

John McNaughton remitted to the committee for deserters

Concerning the petition given in to lords of their majesties’ privy council by Ensign John McNaughton, prisoner in the Canongate tolbooth, shewing that whereas the said lords were graciously pleased to grant a deliverance upon a petition given in if the petitioner could find sufficient bail of 500 merks to live peacefully at home with his friends, and now the petitioner having found one Mr John Boyle, surgeon and burgess of Edinburgh, brother of [David Boyle], laird of Kelburn, and therefore craving that the said lords would be pleased to order the clerks to receive his bail and set him at liberty, recommending his house dues to the treasury, he being their lordships’ alimented prisoner, as the said petition bears. The said lords of their majesties’ privy council, having considered this petition given in to them by the above Ensign John McNaughton, they remit it to the committee formerly appointed for another bill given in by the petitioner on 13 November last with power to them as in the former reference and they remits to the clerks of council to receive such caution as they will be answerable for.

1. PC1/48, 530.

1. PC1/48, 530.

Procedure: remit, 27 December 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuenty Seventh day of December Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/12/501

Procedure: remit

John Weir remitted to the Earl of Leven

Anent the petitione Given in to the Lords of there Majesties privie Councill be John Weer prisoner in the Canongate tolbooth Shewing That where the petitioner haveing evidenced his affectione to the present Government That he did underlye the greatest of hazards at the seidge of Londonderry where he wes deadly wounded And throw the providence of God after his Lyeing a Long tyme wounded attained to some measure of health And his affection and Love being so endeared to there present majesties Interest That he wes willing In so farr as he wes able to serve To take on in the Earle of Levens regiment as a Cadie And served there for the space of ane half year untill he became sickly Considering that his wounds were not fully healled So that his former wounds recurred upon And rendered him altogether Incapable of there Majesties service And Haveing made applicatione to Leivetennent Colonell Arrat upon the Considerations aforsaid Did grant him ane pass in the Colonells absence which is now in the hands of one Leivetennent Colonell Rounalds who throw the Instigation of some maleaffected persones not only did apprehend the petitioner in a most cruell and Barbarous maner contrair to the true rules of humanity And Dragged him out of his naked bed under cloud of night to the Canongate tolbooth But by reaving and abstracting his said pass from him throw violence And by all appearance unles some remeid be provyded The petitioner will nether be able to serve King or Countrey And sieing that the petitioner is most willing that any thing that is represented againest him as a deserter may be putt to a tryall And that the saids Lords will be pleased to consider the hardship the petitioner hes mett with And the vast charges and expenses he hes been putt to dureing his Imprisonement upon the groundles accusationes of officious and disinteressed persones Especiallie Considering the petitioner is able to make appear his Innocence with all the Circumstances of Justice And Lykewayes considering the precogitat malice of his accusers In useing all mischeiff againest the petitioner off purpose to devert him from his Imployment in the Coldtoun where he wes actually working about his Lawfull effairs And therefore Craveing that the saids Lords would be pleased To consider the premises And to Conveen the said Leivetennent Colonell Ronnald befor there Lordships To the effect The petitioners pass may be exhibite and showen to the saids Lords and the Justice of his cause to fall under there Lordships consideratione So that the petitioner may be heard in order to his vindicatione and be Liberat furth of prisone Especially Considering he hes not receaved non of there money or earnest And that his pass may be Given him back or Consigned in there Lordships clerks hands To the effect he may Live peaceably as hitherto he hes done As the said petitione bears The Saids Lords of there majesties privie Councill Haveing heard this petition Given in to them be the within John Weer read in there presence They Recomend to the Earle of Leven to call for and examine the petitioner and consider his pass with power to set him at Liberty In case he shall find Just.

At Edinburgh 27 December 1692

A1692/12/501

Procedure: remit

John Weir remitted to the earl of Leven

Regarding the petition given in to lords of their majesties’ privy council by John Weir, prisoner in the Canongate tolbooth, showing that, where the petitioner having evidenced his affection to the present government that he did underlie the greatest of hazards at the siege of Londonderry where he was seriously wounded and through the providence of God after his lying a long time wounded, attained to some measure of health and his affection and love being so endeared to their present majesties’ interest that he was willing, in so far as he was able to serve, to take on in the earl of Leven’s regiment as a caddy and served there for the space of half a year until he became sickly, considering that his wounds were not fully healed, so that his former wounds recurred and rendered him altogether incapable of their majesties’ service, and having made application to Lieutenant Colonel Arrat upon the foresaid consideration granted him a pass in the colonel’s absence which is now in the hands of one Lieutenant Colonel Ronald who, through the instigation of some malicious persons not only apprehended the petitioner in a most cruel and barbarous manner contrary to the true rules of humanity and dragged him out of his naked bed under cloud of night to the Canongate tolbooth, but by tearing and abstracting his said pass from him through violence, and by all appearance unless some remedy is provided, the petitioner will neither be able to serve king or country, and seeing that the petitioner is most willing that anything that is represented against him as a deserter may be put to a trial, and that the said lords will be pleased to consider the hardship the petitioner has met with, and the vast charges and expenses he has been put to during his imprisonment upon the groundless accusations of officious and disinterested persons, especially considering the petitioner is able to show his innocence with all the circumstances of justice, and likewise considering the preconceived malice of his accusers in using all mischief against the petitioner to divert him from his employment in the Calton where he was actually working about his lawful affairs, and therefore craving that the said lords would be pleased to consider the premises and to convene the said Lieutenant Colonel Ronald before their lordships so that the petitioner’s pass may be exhibited and shown to the said lords and the justice of his cause fall under their lordships’ consideration so that the petitioner may be heard in order for his vindication and be liberated furth of prison, especially considering he has not received any of their money or earnest, and that his pass may be given him back or consigned in their lordships’ clerk’s hands to the effect he may live peacefully as hitherto he has done, as the said petition bears. The said lords of their majesties’ privy council having heard this petition given in to them by the above John Weir read in their presence, they recommend to [David Leslie], earl of Leven to call for and examine the petitioner and consider his pass, with power to set him at liberty in case he shall find it just.

1. PC1/48, 529-30.

1. PC1/48, 529-30.

Act, 27 December 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuenty Seventh day of December Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/12/491

Act

Prorogatione of Robertlands protection

The Lords of there Majesties privie Councill doe hereby prorogat the former personall protectione Given be them to David Cuninghame of Robertland from the dait hereof untill the tenth day of Januarij next to come Inclusive And discharges all messengers officers within burgh and other ministers of the Law From putting any Letters of Captione acts of warding or other personall diligences to executione againest the David Cuninghame dureing the said space Except as to there majesties rents and dues allennarly And assignes the said tenth day of Januarij next to James Hay persewer in this process befor the Councill againest the said David Cuninghame of Robertland For executeing the Further diligence By Captione against the witnesses And in the said process.

At Edinburgh 27 December 1692

A1692/12/491

Act

Prorogation of Robertland’s protection

The lords of their majesties’ privy council hereby prorogue the former personal protection given by them to David Cunningham of Robertland from the date hereof until 10 January next to come inclusive, and they discharge all messengers, officers within burghs and other ministers of the law from putting any letters of caption, acts of warding or other personal diligences to execution against David Cunningham during the said space, except as to their majesties’ rents and dues only, and assigns the said 10 January next to James Hay, pursuer in this process before the council against the said David Cunningham of Robertland, for executing the further diligence by caption against the witnesses and in the said process.

1. PC1/48, 528.

1. PC1/48, 528.

Decreet, 27 December 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuenty Seventh day of December Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/12/481

Decreet

Sentence against Mr Alexander Lundie

The Lords of there Majesties privie Councill Haveing this day Called Mr Alexander Lundie Late minister at Couper one of the ministers within the shyre of Fyff conveened in the Lybell at the sollicitors Instance againest some ministers in that shyre for not prayeing for there majesties King William and Queen Mary And the said Mr Alexander haveing appeared personally at the barr The Saids Lords Considering that the said Mr Alexander at his first appearance befor there Lordships did acknowledge that he preached since the act of parliament of the date the tuenty tuo day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie (anent ministers that have not prayed for the King and Queen) And that he did not pray for the King and Queen Mary by name But haveing a mixed auditory He prayed so as might please both pairties The Saids Lords ordained the said Mr Alexander to be Carryed from the barr to the tolbooth of Edinburgh by the Macers of Councill Therein to remaine dureing the Councills pleasure.

At Edinburgh 27 December 1692

A1692/12/481

Decreet

Sentence against Mr Alexander Lundie

The lords of their majesties’ privy council having this day called Mr Alexander Lundie, late minister at Cupar, one of the ministers within the shire of Fife included in the libel at the solicitor’s instance against some ministers in that shire for not praying for their majesties King William and Queen Mary, and the said Mr Alexander, having appeared personally at the bar, the said lords, considering that the said Mr Alexander at his first appearance before their lordships acknowledged that he preached since the act of parliament of 22 July 1690 (concerning ministers that have not prayed for the king and queen), and that he did not pray for the king and Queen Mary by name but having a mixed auditory he prayed so as might please both parties, the said lords ordained the said Mr Alexander to be carried from the bar to the tolbooth of Edinburgh by the macers of council, there to remain during the council’s pleasure.

1. PC1/48, 528.

1. PC1/48, 528.

Sederunt, 27 December 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuenty Seventh day of December Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years1

A1692/12/472

Sederunt

Lord Chancellour; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Louthian; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Breadalbaine; Viscount Tarbatt; Viscount Stair; Lord Raith; Lord Cardross; Lord Carmichaell; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Advocat; Lord Hattoun; Lord Fountainhall; Lord Enstruther; Laird of Grant; Laird of Blackbarrony; Laird of Pollock; Sir William Lockhart

At Edinburgh 27 December 16921

A1692/12/472

Sederunt

[John Hay, earl of Tweeddale], lord chancellor; [George Livingstone], earl of Linlithgow; [Robert Kerr], earl of Lothian; [David Leslie], earl of Leven; [Archibald Douglas], earl of Forfar; [John Campbell] earl of Breadalbane; [George MacKenzie], Viscount Tarbat; [James Dalrymple], Viscount Stair; [Alexander Melville], Lord Raith; [Henry Erskine], Lord Cardross; [John],Lord Carmichael; [Sir Adam Cockburn or Ormiston], lord justice clerk; [Sir James Stewart of Goodtrees], lord advocate; [John Lauder] Lord Hatton; [John Lauder], Lord Fountainhall; [William Anstruther], Lord Enstruther; [Ludovic Grant], laird of Grant; [Sir Archibald Murray], laird of Blackbarony; [Sir Robert Pollock], laird of Pollock; Sir William Lockhart.

1. PC1/48, 528.

2. PC1/48, 528.

1. PC1/48, 528.

2. PC1/48, 528.