Act, 14 February 1699, Edinburgh

Edinburgh The Fourteinth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne

D1699/2/101

Act

Act Jean Gordon relict of Knockgray

Anent the Petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be Jean Gordon relict of the deceast Alexander Gordon of Knockgray Sheweth That wher the petitioners husband being in the late rigne forfaulted for being at Bothwell bridge, and haveing since the happy revolutione gone over Cheerfully to Flanders in his Majesties Service was billed at the seidge of Namure, and So has left the petitioner Nyne Childrein behind him in very hard Circumstances, And that the petitioner by Contrast of mariadge betwixt her and her husband Stands infeft in ane yearly annualrent of Two hundred and Fiftie merks payable out of her husbands estate as her Sasine herewith testifies. Bot by reason that the petitioners husband had severall Creditors and wher the petitioner offered to seek her yearly Annuity from the tenents They Suspended the Same upon Double distress as appears by the Sumonds of Multiply poynding and Suspension also therwith produced Wher throw the petitioner is altogither frustrat of her and her poor families Maintainance, and She being ane poor Woman, And has not wherupon to discuss the forsaid Suspensione, and it being ordinar for the saids Lords to grant aliements to Widows It was Therfore humbly Craved that the saids Lords would grant the petitioner ane Competent aliement as a Subsistance to her and her poor family as is ordinar in the Like cases As the petitione bears The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Haveing Considered the above petitione given in to them be the above Jean Gordon relict of Alexander Gordon of Knockgray, and petition be way of answer therto by the Creditors, They hereby Recomend to the Lords Commissioners of his Majesties thesaury to make tryall if the said Alexander Gordon of Knockgray was billed in his majesties service at Namure, And if they Find that he was killed, Then Recommends to their Lordships to modifie to his relict such a Soume as their Lordships Shall think fitt for her present Subsistance, And in the mean time Leaves the said Widdow to pursue for ane yearly aliement or her Joynture before the Judge Ordinary as accords in Law.

Edinburgh The Fourteinth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne

D1699/2/101

Act

Act Jean Gordon relict of Knockgray

Anent the Petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be Jean Gordon relict of the deceast Alexander Gordon of Knockgray Sheweth That wher the petitioners husband being in the late rigne forfaulted for being at Bothwell bridge, and haveing since the happy revolutione gone over Cheerfully to Flanders in his Majesties Service was billed at the seidge of Namure, and So has left the petitioner Nyne Childrein behind him in very hard Circumstances, And that the petitioner by Contrast of mariadge betwixt her and her husband Stands infeft in ane yearly annualrent of Two hundred and Fiftie merks payable out of her husbands estate as her Sasine herewith testifies. Bot by reason that the petitioners husband had severall Creditors and wher the petitioner offered to seek her yearly Annuity from the tenents They Suspended the Same upon Double distress as appears by the Sumonds of Multiply poynding and Suspension also therwith produced Wher throw the petitioner is altogither frustrat of her and her poor families Maintainance, and She being ane poor Woman, And has not wherupon to discuss the forsaid Suspensione, and it being ordinar for the saids Lords to grant aliements to Widows It was Therfore humbly Craved that the saids Lords would grant the petitioner ane Competent aliement as a Subsistance to her and her poor family as is ordinar in the Like cases As the petitione bears The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Haveing Considered the above petitione given in to them be the above Jean Gordon relict of Alexander Gordon of Knockgray, and petition be way of answer therto by the Creditors, They hereby Recomend to the Lords Commissioners of his Majesties thesaury to make tryall if the said Alexander Gordon of Knockgray was billed in his majesties service at Namure, And if they Find that he was killed, Then Recommends to their Lordships to modifie to his relict such a Soume as their Lordships Shall think fitt for her present Subsistance, And in the mean time Leaves the said Widdow to pursue for ane yearly aliement or her Joynture before the Judge Ordinary as accords in Law.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 191r-192v.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 191r-192v.

Act, 14 February 1699, Edinburgh

Edinburgh The Fourteinth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne

D1699/2/91

Act

Act Forbes of Foveraigne against Brown

Anent the petition given in to the Lord of his Majesties privy Councill be Samuell Forbes of Foveraigne, Shewing That wher the saids Lords hade once Suspended the letters Simpliciter as to the four hundred merks Condescended on to have been in Browns Chist, and that most Justly It being a part of the fang found with him upon the discoverie in the search made at his own Importimity, yet upon a new bill given in by Brown the saids Lords Have Found the Letters orderly proceeded as to the said Four Hundred merks upon no other ground, Bot that Brown alledged that that money was his own fathers And the petitioner haveing hitherto foreborn to trouble the saids Lords by speaking to their Lordships in so minute and sordid a matter Confiding allwayes in the petitioners Innocency and the saids Lords Justice and Continueing the petitioners purpose as yet, not to trouble the saids Lords with any particular application Bot Considering that it is the intrest and safety of all masters that the honor and reverence due to a masters name be not So much trampled upon by the insolency and villainy of a Servant, and especially of Such a servant allready Condeimned by the saids Lords for most abominable falsehoods Did Therfore humbly represent to the saids Lords this Last reason as it was hoped would make it evident that the Letters ought to be suspended Simpliciter or at least Caution farder found then by the late interloquitor is yet appointed And primo no Stress could be Laid upon Such words uttured by Brown as to the four hundred merks being his fathers It being a Comon and true proverb, That he who will Steall will Likewayes Lye. And Suppose it were Credible that the money had been Browns fathers as it was incredible, since it was notour in all that Countrey, That the man hade never So much Spare money in his life, Yet Brown Saying so, Is no probation that it was So; And therfore needs some other Testimony then his oun words Secundo It was offered to be2 made appear by Craigies deposition that these words of Brown are really false, Because his father was Still in such Condition That he Rather to get from them was able to gett from his sone, Tertio Craigies deposition does clear that Brown himself Confest a part of the money to have been the petitioners, and farder that in the end he confessed all to be the petitioners By these words; Take all and keep all for all is yours only give me a discharge. Quarto Suppose that some Stress were to be Laid even upon Brownds words, yet the petitioner ought to have Compensation upon a Liquid debt of Six hundred merks most Justly Decerned against him by the saids Lords For it were very hard to ordaine the petitioner to give to Brown what he had not proven to be due to him, Bot by his oun words And not to allow the petitioner Compensation of a liquid debt most Justly Decerned by the saids Lords as said is Quinto Broun haveing Confessed before the saids Lords that ther was a proces for thift, depending against him before the Shirreff depute of Aberdeen alse weell as ane Compt and reckoning It seems hard that the petitioner Should be decerned to restore the Fang and Imbazled goods to the theif and Imbazler before the event of the said proces It being humbly Supposed that at Least the theif and Imbazler ought to be appointed to find Caution to appear and answer in the said proces of theift, and to pay damnadges and to clear his accompts, and to pay what damnadge shall be decerned against him as weell as to restore the four hundred merks For otherwayes the petitioner might come to be a Loser in more then four thousand merks Considering the falsenes of his accompts and greatnes of his Imbazlments wherof the discovery was only a Scratch It being more then Credible and already talked that if he get the four hundred merks in his hands he will flee the Countrey and goe amongst other people wher he may more Conveniently re act his former villanies And farder It being Impossible for the petitioner (now necessarly at the place) to deliver up a Chist to Brown at Foverain Which Chist the petitioner never Seazed and wherof the petitioner never handled the key which he has to this day keeped and only treacherously left the Chist at the petitioners house And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be pleased to Suspend the Letters Simpliciter esto the four hundred merks, and by reasone of the falshoods proven already against Brown and the saids Lords most Just decreet therupon, To appoint him to find Caution to answer to the said proces of theift Which the Shirreff hath hitherto neglected to Cause him doe, and Likewayes to appoint him to find Caution to pay damnadges and the balance of accompts of the six hundred merks Decerned by the saids Lords oun decreet, as also to declare that the petitioners giveing ane wryten order to the petitioners servants at Foveraine to allow Brown Access to the petitioners house and to take out his Chist which he so treacherously left ther shall be sufficient and due obedience given by the petitioner to the saids Lords interloquitor as to that point It being all that is possible for the petitioner to doe at this distance the petitioner being so necessary here at the time The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this petition given in to them be Samuell Forbes of Foveraigne and petitione be way answer made be James Brown Sone to Patrick Brown in Ithsie to the Samen They hereby adhere to their former interloquitor pronounced by them upon the fifth day of July last by past, And Ordaines the Clerks of Councill to give to the said James Brown ane extract of the forsaid interloquitor with this alteratione or additione That the Said James Brown Shall have free access to his Chist in the said Lord of Foveraigne his house and to transport the same to what other place he pleases and to dispose therupon and upon what is therin at his pleasure Which is to be full and due obedience to that point of the former interloquitor.

Edinburgh The Fourteinth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne

D1699/2/91

Act

Act Forbes of Foveraigne against Brown

Anent the petition given in to the Lord of his Majesties privy Councill be Samuell Forbes of Foveraigne, Shewing That wher the saids Lords hade once Suspended the letters Simpliciter as to the four hundred merks Condescended on to have been in Browns Chist, and that most Justly It being a part of the fang found with him upon the discoverie in the search made at his own Importimity, yet upon a new bill given in by Brown the saids Lords Have Found the Letters orderly proceeded as to the said Four Hundred merks upon no other ground, Bot that Brown alledged that that money was his own fathers And the petitioner haveing hitherto foreborn to trouble the saids Lords by speaking to their Lordships in so minute and sordid a matter Confiding allwayes in the petitioners Innocency and the saids Lords Justice and Continueing the petitioners purpose as yet, not to trouble the saids Lords with any particular application Bot Considering that it is the intrest and safety of all masters that the honor and reverence due to a masters name be not So much trampled upon by the insolency and villainy of a Servant, and especially of Such a servant allready Condeimned by the saids Lords for most abominable falsehoods Did Therfore humbly represent to the saids Lords this Last reason as it was hoped would make it evident that the Letters ought to be suspended Simpliciter or at least Caution farder found then by the late interloquitor is yet appointed And primo no Stress could be Laid upon Such words uttured by Brown as to the four hundred merks being his fathers It being a Comon and true proverb, That he who will Steall will Likewayes Lye. And Suppose it were Credible that the money had been Browns fathers as it was incredible, since it was notour in all that Countrey, That the man hade never So much Spare money in his life, Yet Brown Saying so, Is no probation that it was So; And therfore needs some other Testimony then his oun words Secundo It was offered to be2 made appear by Craigies deposition that these words of Brown are really false, Because his father was Still in such Condition That he Rather to get from them was able to gett from his sone, Tertio Craigies deposition does clear that Brown himself Confest a part of the money to have been the petitioners, and farder that in the end he confessed all to be the petitioners By these words; Take all and keep all for all is yours only give me a discharge. Quarto Suppose that some Stress were to be Laid even upon Brownds words, yet the petitioner ought to have Compensation upon a Liquid debt of Six hundred merks most Justly Decerned against him by the saids Lords For it were very hard to ordaine the petitioner to give to Brown what he had not proven to be due to him, Bot by his oun words And not to allow the petitioner Compensation of a liquid debt most Justly Decerned by the saids Lords as said is Quinto Broun haveing Confessed before the saids Lords that ther was a proces for thift, depending against him before the Shirreff depute of Aberdeen alse weell as ane Compt and reckoning It seems hard that the petitioner Should be decerned to restore the Fang and Imbazled goods to the theif and Imbazler before the event of the said proces It being humbly Supposed that at Least the theif and Imbazler ought to be appointed to find Caution to appear and answer in the said proces of theift, and to pay damnadges and to clear his accompts, and to pay what damnadge shall be decerned against him as weell as to restore the four hundred merks For otherwayes the petitioner might come to be a Loser in more then four thousand merks Considering the falsenes of his accompts and greatnes of his Imbazlments wherof the discovery was only a Scratch It being more then Credible and already talked that if he get the four hundred merks in his hands he will flee the Countrey and goe amongst other people wher he may more Conveniently re act his former villanies And farder It being Impossible for the petitioner (now necessarly at the place) to deliver up a Chist to Brown at Foverain Which Chist the petitioner never Seazed and wherof the petitioner never handled the key which he has to this day keeped and only treacherously left the Chist at the petitioners house And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be pleased to Suspend the Letters Simpliciter esto the four hundred merks, and by reasone of the falshoods proven already against Brown and the saids Lords most Just decreet therupon, To appoint him to find Caution to answer to the said proces of theift Which the Shirreff hath hitherto neglected to Cause him doe, and Likewayes to appoint him to find Caution to pay damnadges and the balance of accompts of the six hundred merks Decerned by the saids Lords oun decreet, as also to declare that the petitioners giveing ane wryten order to the petitioners servants at Foveraine to allow Brown Access to the petitioners house and to take out his Chist which he so treacherously left ther shall be sufficient and due obedience given by the petitioner to the saids Lords interloquitor as to that point It being all that is possible for the petitioner to doe at this distance the petitioner being so necessary here at the time The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this petition given in to them be Samuell Forbes of Foveraigne and petitione be way answer made be James Brown Sone to Patrick Brown in Ithsie to the Samen They hereby adhere to their former interloquitor pronounced by them upon the fifth day of July last by past, And Ordaines the Clerks of Councill to give to the said James Brown ane extract of the forsaid interloquitor with this alteratione or additione That the Said James Brown Shall have free access to his Chist in the said Lord of Foveraigne his house and to transport the same to what other place he pleases and to dispose therupon and upon what is therin at his pleasure Which is to be full and due obedience to that point of the former interloquitor.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189v-191r.

2. The word ‘proven’ scored out here.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189v-191r.

2. The word ‘proven’ scored out here.

Sederunt, 14 February 1699, Edinburgh

Edinburgh The Fourteinth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne1

D1699/2/82

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Argyll; Earl of Marr; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lowdone; Earl of Northesk; Lord Strathnaver; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Pollwarth; Lord Carmicheall; Lord Ross; Lord Boyle; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Philiphaugh; Mr Fr: Montgomry; Laird of Pollock

Edinburgh The Fourteinth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne1

D1699/2/82

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Argyll; Earl of Marr; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lowdone; Earl of Northesk; Lord Strathnaver; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Pollwarth; Lord Carmicheall; Lord Ross; Lord Boyle; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Philiphaugh; Mr Fr: Montgomry; Laird of Pollock

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189v.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 189v.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189v.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 189v.

Procedure, 9 February 1699, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Nynth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years

D1699/2/71

Procedure

Recomendation To the Lord advocat to wryt not2 to stopt meall comeing to Glasgow

Letter from James Peadie provest of Glasgow to John Anderson of Dowhill Late provest therof Complaineing of victuall comeing from other places to Glasgow that it is Stoped by the way, Being this day read in presence of the Lords of his majesties privy Councill and they haveing Considered the same They hereby Recommend to Sir James Stewart his majesties advocat who presented the said Letter To wryt to any Shirriffs magistrats or others to whom his Lordships shall think fitt Dischargeing them to stope any grain or victuall from any place transporting to Glasgow to be meall and sold in the publict marcat.

Att Edinburgh the Nynth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years

D1699/2/71

Procedure

Recomendation To the Lord advocat to wryt not2 to stopt meall comeing to Glasgow

Letter from James Peadie provest of Glasgow to John Anderson of Dowhill Late provest therof Complaineing of victuall comeing from other places to Glasgow that it is Stoped by the way, Being this day read in presence of the Lords of his majesties privy Councill and they haveing Considered the same They hereby Recommend to Sir James Stewart his majesties advocat who presented the said Letter To wryt to any Shirriffs magistrats or others to whom his Lordships shall think fitt Dischargeing them to stope any grain or victuall from any place transporting to Glasgow to be meall and sold in the publict marcat.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189r.

2. The words ‘to wryte not’ are an insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189r.

2. The words ‘to wryte not’ are an insertion.

Warrant, 9 February 1699, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Nynth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years

D1699/2/61

Warrant

Warrant for removeing of Dragoons

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Do hereby Recommend to the Earle of Argyle Commander in Cheiff of his Majesties forces withint this kingdome for the time To give Order for removeing Twentie five dragoons of that troope of Dragoons Lying at Falkirk from the Town of Falkirk and to quarter them at the Town of Kilsyth

Att Edinburgh the Nynth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years

D1699/2/61

Warrant

Warrant for removeing of Dragoons

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Do hereby Recommend to the Earle of Argyle Commander in Cheiff of his Majesties forces withint this kingdome for the time To give Order for removeing Twentie five dragoons of that troope of Dragoons Lying at Falkirk from the Town of Falkirk and to quarter them at the Town of Kilsyth

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189r.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189r.

Sederunt, 9 February 1699, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Nynth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years1

D1699/2/52

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Duke of Queensberry P:S:; Earl of Argyle; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Marr; Earl of Mortoune; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Lowdoune; Earl of Leven; Earl of Annandale; Earl of Northesk; Lord Strathnaver; Lord Carmichaell; Lord Ross; Lord Boyle; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Philiphaugh; Lord Halcraig; Lord Crossrig; Mr Fra Montgomry; Laird of Pollock; Laird of Stevenson

Att Edinburgh the Nynth day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years1

D1699/2/52

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Duke of Queensberry P:S:; Earl of Argyle; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Marr; Earl of Mortoune; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Lowdoune; Earl of Leven; Earl of Annandale; Earl of Northesk; Lord Strathnaver; Lord Carmichaell; Lord Ross; Lord Boyle; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Philiphaugh; Lord Halcraig; Lord Crossrig; Mr Fra Montgomry; Laird of Pollock; Laird of Stevenson

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189r.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 189r.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 189r.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 189r.

Act, 7 February 1699, Edinburgh

Edinburgh The Seventh day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years

D1699/2/41

Act

Act John Philp Sone to David Philp

Anent the petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be John Philip Sone to the deceast David Philp merchant in Edinburgh Shewing That the petitioner being Served heir to the said David Philp his father and to the deceast Mr John Philp Minister at Queensferry his uncle and the said Mr John being seized upon and incarcerat for some words Spocken by him against the late King James then Duke of York and at that time the said Mr John Philp being the said petitioners tutor in Law, and haveing the Custody of his haill wrytes, They and also Mr John Philps own wrytes were seized upon and sent to the saids Lords of privy Councill and the deceast Adam Mastertoune of Grainge who was Chosen Currator to the said petitioner, Haveing made application to their Lordships to Ordaine the Clerks of Councill to delyver up such wrytes and evidents as they had concerning the said petitioners fortune The saids Lords by their act of the date the nynth day of July Jaj vic nyntie one years Ordained the Clerks of Councill to delyver up to the said Adam Mastertoune the petitioners2 Curator Such wrytes and evidents as they had Concerning the said petitioners fortune as the said act produced to the saids Lords has made appear, And Seing the said Adam Mastertoune the said petitioners Curator by vertue of the said out produced to the saids Lords has made appear, And Seing the said Adam Mastertoune the said petitioners Curator by vertue of the said act got up from the Clerks of Councill Severall bonds and other wrytes belonging to him Conforme to ane inventar and his recept theron, And has uplifted severall Soumes of money belonging to the said petitioner and that it is necessar to have up the said Adam Mastertoune his recept (For verifieing the petitioners claime against his representatives upon upon3 the petitioners granting ane recept therof to the Clerks of Councill, as also ther are severall rights and evidents of the said petitioners Lands and estate Compt books and other wrytes Lying yet in the saids Clerks hands Which the said petitioner should have upon recept And Therfore Humbly Craveing In maner and to the effect aftermentioned, The Saids Lords of his Majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this petition given in to them; be the said John Philp, with the act mentioned therin and produced therwith, They hereby give Order and warrand to ther Clerks of Councill to delyver up to the petitioner, not only the said Adam Mastertoune of Grange his recept upon the above Inventar it self upon the said petitioners granting recept therof, Bot also to delyver to the said John Philp petitioner the haill other wrytes Compt books and others in their Custody belonging to the said petitioner and that upon Inventar and the said petitioners recept upon the Same.

Edinburgh The Seventh day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years

D1699/2/41

Act

Act John Philp Sone to David Philp

Anent the petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be John Philip Sone to the deceast David Philp merchant in Edinburgh Shewing That the petitioner being Served heir to the said David Philp his father and to the deceast Mr John Philp Minister at Queensferry his uncle and the said Mr John being seized upon and incarcerat for some words Spocken by him against the late King James then Duke of York and at that time the said Mr John Philp being the said petitioners tutor in Law, and haveing the Custody of his haill wrytes, They and also Mr John Philps own wrytes were seized upon and sent to the saids Lords of privy Councill and the deceast Adam Mastertoune of Grainge who was Chosen Currator to the said petitioner, Haveing made application to their Lordships to Ordaine the Clerks of Councill to delyver up such wrytes and evidents as they had concerning the said petitioners fortune The saids Lords by their act of the date the nynth day of July Jaj vic nyntie one years Ordained the Clerks of Councill to delyver up to the said Adam Mastertoune the petitioners2 Curator Such wrytes and evidents as they had Concerning the said petitioners fortune as the said act produced to the saids Lords has made appear, And Seing the said Adam Mastertoune the said petitioners Curator by vertue of the said out produced to the saids Lords has made appear, And Seing the said Adam Mastertoune the said petitioners Curator by vertue of the said act got up from the Clerks of Councill Severall bonds and other wrytes belonging to him Conforme to ane inventar and his recept theron, And has uplifted severall Soumes of money belonging to the said petitioner and that it is necessar to have up the said Adam Mastertoune his recept (For verifieing the petitioners claime against his representatives upon upon3 the petitioners granting ane recept therof to the Clerks of Councill, as also ther are severall rights and evidents of the said petitioners Lands and estate Compt books and other wrytes Lying yet in the saids Clerks hands Which the said petitioner should have upon recept And Therfore Humbly Craveing In maner and to the effect aftermentioned, The Saids Lords of his Majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this petition given in to them; be the said John Philp, with the act mentioned therin and produced therwith, They hereby give Order and warrand to ther Clerks of Councill to delyver up to the petitioner, not only the said Adam Mastertoune of Grange his recept upon the above Inventar it self upon the said petitioners granting recept therof, Bot also to delyver to the said John Philp petitioner the haill other wrytes Compt books and others in their Custody belonging to the said petitioner and that upon Inventar and the said petitioners recept upon the Same.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 188r-189r.

2. The word ‘wrytes’ scored out here.

3. Sic.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 188r-189r.

2. The word ‘wrytes’ scored out here.

3. Sic.

Sederunt, 7 February 1699, Edinburgh

Edinburgh The Seventh day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years1

D1699/2/32

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Duke of Queensbery P:S:; Earl of Argyle; Earl of Marr; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lowdown; Earl of Leven; Earl of Anandale; Earl of Northesk; Lord Strathnaver; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Carmicheall; Lord Ruthven; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Philiphaugh; Mr Fran: Montgomry; Laird of Stivensone

Edinburgh The Seventh day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years1

D1699/2/32

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Duke of Queensbery P:S:; Earl of Argyle; Earl of Marr; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lowdown; Earl of Leven; Earl of Anandale; Earl of Northesk; Lord Strathnaver; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Carmicheall; Lord Ruthven; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Philiphaugh; Mr Fran: Montgomry; Laird of Stivensone

1. NRS, PC2/27, 188r.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 188r.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 188r.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 188r.

Act, 2 February 1699, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Second day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years

D1699/2/21

Act

Act and Remitt Udney of Auchterellen Against Forbes of Wattertoune et e contra

Anent The Lybell or Letters of Complaint raised before the Lords of his majesties privy Councill at the instance of […] Udney of Auchterellen With Concourse of Sir James Stewart his Majesties advocat for his highnes intrest in the matter underwrittin Making Mention, That wher by the Lawes of this and all other weell governed nationes and by the Lawes and acts of parliament of this kingdome the violent and Sumar inverting of any of his majesties Lediges their possession without any order of Law, and breaking in peices Cruives and breaking of Damns and Stopting of a goeing milne as also the unlawfull Convocation of his majesties Leidges with Weapon invasive, and doeing of deeds under cloud and Sillence of night to the prejudice of any of his Majesties Lridges be all Crymes of ane high nature, and severly punishable by the Lawes and acts of parliament of this kingdome Nevertheless It is of verity that the said pursuer haveing ryd by progress to a Chartor under the great Seall in the year Jaj vic and thrie Infavors of Alexander Annan then of Auchterellen of the Lands of Auchterellen with the Salmond fishing on the watter of Ithan adjacent to the saids Lands and ane ample power and priviledge of Setting up and Errecting Cruives upon the most Commodious place of the said watter And by vertue of this Clause Containeing the fishings, The said pursuers authors and predecessors have ever been Since the date of the said Chartor in ane uninterupted and peaceable possession of fishing by Coble and nett and otherwayes upon the said watter of Ithain till within these few moneths interupted by the Laird of Wattertoune, and the said pursuer haveing Lately Conforme to the said Clause of the Chartor built and sett up a Cruive upon his oun damn dyke in alse regular and legall a maner as any Cruive ought to be Conforme to the acts of parliament made theranent yett Thomas Forbes of Wattertoune after the said Cruive was built and sett in ded upon the Tenth, Eleventh Twelth or ane or other of the dayes of the moneth of August Last by past Conveen John Gairn at the Milne of Wattertoune John Chrystie in Ellon, Alexander Martine in Tarmishie Thomas Temple in Ellon and others his accomplices to the number of Twentie or threttie men with polls forks Gavelochs quarrell mells, Staffs Long polls hammers and other weapons and instruments and Clandistinely under Silence and Cloud of night came to the Milne Damn wher the said Cruive was sett up, and in a violent and hostile maner brock the said Crive in peices and threw doune the said damn dyke so that the milne was suscless and stopt till the damn dyke was rebuilt By all Which It is manifast that the said Laird of Watterroune and his forsaids Accomplices abovenamed are guilty Airt and part of ane open and Manifast Ryot, and therfore they ought and Should not only be decerned to put in the said Crive, Bot also Decerned in the Soume of […] of Damnadges and otherwayes punished in their persones and good to the teror and example of others to Committ the Like in time comeing And Anent the Charge given to the saids defenders To have Compeired personally before the saids Lords at ane Certaine day now bygone To have answered to the grounds of the said Complaint and to have heard and seen such order and Course taken theranent as appertaines as in the said principall lybell and executiones therof more fully is Contained, And Alse Anent the Lybell of Reconventione raised before the saids Lords of privy Councill at the instance of the said Thomas Forbes of Wattertoune With Concourse of Sir James Stewart his Majesties advocat for his highnes intrest in the matter underwrittin That wher by the Lawes of this realme particularly the act Eliventh James first Parliament first the Wydnes of the hecks of Salmond Cruives is appointed to be thrie Inches And not only by the act James the fifth parliament fourth Caput Seventeinth are the holders of Cruives against the Law punished as Slayers of Reid fish id est the Tinsell of their lyfe for the thrid fault be the fifteinth act fourtein parliament James the second, and the act Seventie thrie parliament, Sixth James the fourth Bot Likewayes all Landed Gentlemen are by the act 2 Sixtie Eight parliament Nynth of Queen Mary Ordained under Certaine paynes and penalties to put the acts anent the doun putting of inlawfull Cruives to due executione within their respective bounds, and by the Commissione Granted to Certaine Judges for destroying of un Lawfull Cruives non are exempted from the executione of the said Commission Bot Such as are infeft and also in possession of holding Cruives, providing the hecks be not the due widnes aforsaid Likeas the Contempt of the Authority of the Supream Judges of the Land by attempting upon Innovations anent matters of Judiciall Dependance before them, or the Cause be brought to a Closse Is a Cryme and fault of no Small Consequence as tending the partie so doer his takeing right to himself at his oun hand, Likeas the Missrepresenting of the Leidges to the Lords of privy Councill as guilty of violent Invassions and breaches of peace in the right time while ther is no ground for any such accusation is a Cryme and fault highly punishable, And True It is That Robert Udney of Auchterellen pretending a3 right to Salmond fishing on the watter of Ithan, whose pretensions and rights were drawn in question before the Lords of Councill and Session by way of Reduction and Improbation at the said pursuers instance upon his and his authors unquestionable infeftments from the one thousand and five hundred year of God forwards of fishing upon the said watter of Itham from the Macher foord to the Foord of Fyvie Which is farr above the bounds of the defender his said pretended fishing and within which bounds the said defender cannot alledge that ever he or his authors were in use of holding of Cruives, notwithstanding wherof and dureing the dependance of the said proces of reductione He the said defender did at his own hand adventure in August Last to build a Cruive in his milne damne dyke to the great distructione and detriment of the said pursuers Salmond fishing in so much that the hecks of the said usurped Cruive were not above two inshes wid at Least for within the widnes aforsaid appointed be act of parliament and the said pursuer upon his being Certiorat of such ane Usurpation in the said defenders pairt, Haveing according to the facultie allowed to Landed Gentlmen be the act of parliament aforsaid come with men and matterialls Suitable for demolishing of the said unlawfull Cruive Did in day Light and with Sun Shyne put down and demolish the same, Which the said defender has wrongeously represented to the Lord of his Majesties privy Councill, as if the said pursuer hade in the night time and with force of armed men invaded the defenders ancient possession of Cruive fishing and violently sett up his goeing milnes Brock his damns, and did other unjustifieable things, while as the said pursuer acted nothing bot by warrand of Law, and in his own defence against the said defender his made usurpations upon him pendente Lite, And of which Crymes of unwarrantable Innovateing of possessione pendente Liti, and of holding unlawfull Cruives of hecks within the widnes appointed by the act of parliament and of Misrepresenting the Said pursuer as said is, The said defenders being found guilty He ought to be punished in his person and purse to the teror of others and to pay to the said pursuer the Soume of […] in name of Damnadges by reasone of the expences and trouble the said defender his said vexatious and groundless Misrepresentation and groundless Misrepresentatione aforsaid has occasioned the said pursuer And Anent the Charge given to the Said Robert Udney defender To Have Compeared before the Saids Lords at ane Certaine day now bygone To have Answered to the points of the above Complaint, and to have heard and seen Such order and Course taken theranent as they should find Just as in the Said Letters of Reconvention at more Length is Contained, Which Lybell at the Instance of the above Udney of Auchterellen against the above Thomas Forbes of Wattertone being this day Called in presence of the Lords of his majesties privy Councill and the above lybell of reconvention The said Forbes of Withertoune against the said Udney of Auchterellen being Likewayes Called being Likewayes Called4 in presence of the Saids Lords, and both parties Compearing personally, and Mr David Dalrymple, Sir Androw Home and Mr James Fergusone Compearing as procurators for the said Udney of Auchterellen pursuer in the principall Cause and defender in the reconventione, And Mr David Forbes advocat Compearing as procurator for the said Forbes of Wattertoune defender in the principall Cause and pursuer in the reconventione, and the rest of the defenders in the principall Cause The principall Lybell and answers made therto, And also the lybell reconvention being read, And the saids Lords haveing Considered both Lybells with answers made to the principall Lybell, They hereby Remitt both Lybells to the Lords of Councill and Session to be Summarly proceeded in and discust before their Lordships both as to the point of right and possession and as to the damnadges above Lybelled on.

Att Edinburgh The Second day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years

D1699/2/21

Act

Act and Remitt Udney of Auchterellen Against Forbes of Wattertoune et e contra

Anent The Lybell or Letters of Complaint raised before the Lords of his majesties privy Councill at the instance of […] Udney of Auchterellen With Concourse of Sir James Stewart his Majesties advocat for his highnes intrest in the matter underwrittin Making Mention, That wher by the Lawes of this and all other weell governed nationes and by the Lawes and acts of parliament of this kingdome the violent and Sumar inverting of any of his majesties Lediges their possession without any order of Law, and breaking in peices Cruives and breaking of Damns and Stopting of a goeing milne as also the unlawfull Convocation of his majesties Leidges with Weapon invasive, and doeing of deeds under cloud and Sillence of night to the prejudice of any of his Majesties Lridges be all Crymes of ane high nature, and severly punishable by the Lawes and acts of parliament of this kingdome Nevertheless It is of verity that the said pursuer haveing ryd by progress to a Chartor under the great Seall in the year Jaj vic and thrie Infavors of Alexander Annan then of Auchterellen of the Lands of Auchterellen with the Salmond fishing on the watter of Ithan adjacent to the saids Lands and ane ample power and priviledge of Setting up and Errecting Cruives upon the most Commodious place of the said watter And by vertue of this Clause Containeing the fishings, The said pursuers authors and predecessors have ever been Since the date of the said Chartor in ane uninterupted and peaceable possession of fishing by Coble and nett and otherwayes upon the said watter of Ithain till within these few moneths interupted by the Laird of Wattertoune, and the said pursuer haveing Lately Conforme to the said Clause of the Chartor built and sett up a Cruive upon his oun damn dyke in alse regular and legall a maner as any Cruive ought to be Conforme to the acts of parliament made theranent yett Thomas Forbes of Wattertoune after the said Cruive was built and sett in ded upon the Tenth, Eleventh Twelth or ane or other of the dayes of the moneth of August Last by past Conveen John Gairn at the Milne of Wattertoune John Chrystie in Ellon, Alexander Martine in Tarmishie Thomas Temple in Ellon and others his accomplices to the number of Twentie or threttie men with polls forks Gavelochs quarrell mells, Staffs Long polls hammers and other weapons and instruments and Clandistinely under Silence and Cloud of night came to the Milne Damn wher the said Cruive was sett up, and in a violent and hostile maner brock the said Crive in peices and threw doune the said damn dyke so that the milne was suscless and stopt till the damn dyke was rebuilt By all Which It is manifast that the said Laird of Watterroune and his forsaids Accomplices abovenamed are guilty Airt and part of ane open and Manifast Ryot, and therfore they ought and Should not only be decerned to put in the said Crive, Bot also Decerned in the Soume of […] of Damnadges and otherwayes punished in their persones and good to the teror and example of others to Committ the Like in time comeing And Anent the Charge given to the saids defenders To have Compeired personally before the saids Lords at ane Certaine day now bygone To have answered to the grounds of the said Complaint and to have heard and seen such order and Course taken theranent as appertaines as in the said principall lybell and executiones therof more fully is Contained, And Alse Anent the Lybell of Reconventione raised before the saids Lords of privy Councill at the instance of the said Thomas Forbes of Wattertoune With Concourse of Sir James Stewart his Majesties advocat for his highnes intrest in the matter underwrittin That wher by the Lawes of this realme particularly the act Eliventh James first Parliament first the Wydnes of the hecks of Salmond Cruives is appointed to be thrie Inches And not only by the act James the fifth parliament fourth Caput Seventeinth are the holders of Cruives against the Law punished as Slayers of Reid fish id est the Tinsell of their lyfe for the thrid fault be the fifteinth act fourtein parliament James the second, and the act Seventie thrie parliament, Sixth James the fourth Bot Likewayes all Landed Gentlemen are by the act 2 Sixtie Eight parliament Nynth of Queen Mary Ordained under Certaine paynes and penalties to put the acts anent the doun putting of inlawfull Cruives to due executione within their respective bounds, and by the Commissione Granted to Certaine Judges for destroying of un Lawfull Cruives non are exempted from the executione of the said Commission Bot Such as are infeft and also in possession of holding Cruives, providing the hecks be not the due widnes aforsaid Likeas the Contempt of the Authority of the Supream Judges of the Land by attempting upon Innovations anent matters of Judiciall Dependance before them, or the Cause be brought to a Closse Is a Cryme and fault of no Small Consequence as tending the partie so doer his takeing right to himself at his oun hand, Likeas the Missrepresenting of the Leidges to the Lords of privy Councill as guilty of violent Invassions and breaches of peace in the right time while ther is no ground for any such accusation is a Cryme and fault highly punishable, And True It is That Robert Udney of Auchterellen pretending a3 right to Salmond fishing on the watter of Ithan, whose pretensions and rights were drawn in question before the Lords of Councill and Session by way of Reduction and Improbation at the said pursuers instance upon his and his authors unquestionable infeftments from the one thousand and five hundred year of God forwards of fishing upon the said watter of Itham from the Macher foord to the Foord of Fyvie Which is farr above the bounds of the defender his said pretended fishing and within which bounds the said defender cannot alledge that ever he or his authors were in use of holding of Cruives, notwithstanding wherof and dureing the dependance of the said proces of reductione He the said defender did at his own hand adventure in August Last to build a Cruive in his milne damne dyke to the great distructione and detriment of the said pursuers Salmond fishing in so much that the hecks of the said usurped Cruive were not above two inshes wid at Least for within the widnes aforsaid appointed be act of parliament and the said pursuer upon his being Certiorat of such ane Usurpation in the said defenders pairt, Haveing according to the facultie allowed to Landed Gentlmen be the act of parliament aforsaid come with men and matterialls Suitable for demolishing of the said unlawfull Cruive Did in day Light and with Sun Shyne put down and demolish the same, Which the said defender has wrongeously represented to the Lord of his Majesties privy Councill, as if the said pursuer hade in the night time and with force of armed men invaded the defenders ancient possession of Cruive fishing and violently sett up his goeing milnes Brock his damns, and did other unjustifieable things, while as the said pursuer acted nothing bot by warrand of Law, and in his own defence against the said defender his made usurpations upon him pendente Lite, And of which Crymes of unwarrantable Innovateing of possessione pendente Liti, and of holding unlawfull Cruives of hecks within the widnes appointed by the act of parliament and of Misrepresenting the Said pursuer as said is, The said defenders being found guilty He ought to be punished in his person and purse to the teror of others and to pay to the said pursuer the Soume of […] in name of Damnadges by reasone of the expences and trouble the said defender his said vexatious and groundless Misrepresentation and groundless Misrepresentatione aforsaid has occasioned the said pursuer And Anent the Charge given to the Said Robert Udney defender To Have Compeared before the Saids Lords at ane Certaine day now bygone To have Answered to the points of the above Complaint, and to have heard and seen Such order and Course taken theranent as they should find Just as in the Said Letters of Reconvention at more Length is Contained, Which Lybell at the Instance of the above Udney of Auchterellen against the above Thomas Forbes of Wattertone being this day Called in presence of the Lords of his majesties privy Councill and the above lybell of reconvention The said Forbes of Withertoune against the said Udney of Auchterellen being Likewayes Called being Likewayes Called4 in presence of the Saids Lords, and both parties Compearing personally, and Mr David Dalrymple, Sir Androw Home and Mr James Fergusone Compearing as procurators for the said Udney of Auchterellen pursuer in the principall Cause and defender in the reconventione, And Mr David Forbes advocat Compearing as procurator for the said Forbes of Wattertoune defender in the principall Cause and pursuer in the reconventione, and the rest of the defenders in the principall Cause The principall Lybell and answers made therto, And also the lybell reconvention being read, And the saids Lords haveing Considered both Lybells with answers made to the principall Lybell, They hereby Remitt both Lybells to the Lords of Councill and Session to be Summarly proceeded in and discust before their Lordships both as to the point of right and possession and as to the damnadges above Lybelled on.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 185r-188r.

2. The letters ‘Jaj‘ scored out here.

3. Insertion.

4. Sic.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 185r-188r.

2. The letters ‘Jaj‘ scored out here.

3. Insertion.

4. Sic.

Sederunt, 2 February 1699, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Second day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years1

D1699/2/12

Sederunt

Lord Chancelour; Duke of Queensbery p.s.; Earl of Argyle; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Marr; Earl of Mortoune; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Lowdon; Earl of Leven; Earl of Anandale; Earl of Northesk; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Ross; Lord Ruthven; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Halcraig; Lord Rankeillor; Lord Phesdoe; Laird of Pollock; Laird of Kelburne; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Second day of February Jaj vic Nyntie Nyne years1

D1699/2/12

Sederunt

Lord Chancelour; Duke of Queensbery p.s.; Earl of Argyle; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Marr; Earl of Mortoune; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Lowdon; Earl of Leven; Earl of Anandale; Earl of Northesk; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Ross; Lord Ruthven; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Halcraig; Lord Rankeillor; Lord Phesdoe; Laird of Pollock; Laird of Kelburne; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/27, 185r.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 185r.

1. NRS, PC2/27, 185r.

2. NRS, PC2/27, 185r.