Act, 9 January 1700, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Nynth day of January Jaj viic years

A1700/1/81

Act

Act For paying in the Pole to the Collectors of the Cess and Supply of the shire of Mid-Lothian

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill, Having considered the Proclamation of Councill in December Jaj vic nynty Eight appointing the Commissioners of Supply within the Severall Shires to take Caution of their Clerks That they shall with the said supply collect also the Polemoney appointed to his Majesty by act of Parliament, Jaj vic nynty Eight years, Appointes the said Proclamation to be Intimat To the Tacksmen of the said polemoney be the Sheriff Clerk of Edinburgh for ane Rule to that Shire, for paying in their Pole to the Collector of the Cess and Supply.

Att Edinburgh The Nynth day of January Jaj viic years

A1700/1/81

Act

Act For paying in the Pole to the Collectors of the Cess and Supply of the shire of Mid-Lothian

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill, Having considered the Proclamation of Councill in December Jaj vic nynty Eight appointing the Commissioners of Supply within the Severall Shires to take Caution of their Clerks That they shall with the said supply collect also the Polemoney appointed to his Majesty by act of Parliament, Jaj vic nynty Eight years, Appointes the said Proclamation to be Intimat To the Tacksmen of the said polemoney be the Sheriff Clerk of Edinburgh for ane Rule to that Shire, for paying in their Pole to the Collector of the Cess and Supply.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 56.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 56.

Procedure, 9 January 1700, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Nynth day of January Jaj viic years

A1700/1/71

Procedure

The Lord Advocat To Raise a Process against the Heretors of Prestonpans and Tranent

The Lords of his majesties privy Councill Haveing considered the within Report from the Sheriff of Haddingtoun, They heirby Recomend To his Majesties Advocat, To raise a process before their Lordships against the Heretors within the paroches of Prestonpanns and Tranent for their Disobedience and Neglect In not observeing of the Acts of Parliament, and Proclamationes of Councill for mantaining the poor, and That with his Lordships first Conveniency.

Att Edinburgh The Nynth day of January Jaj viic years

A1700/1/71

Procedure

The Lord Advocat To Raise a Process against the Heretors of Prestonpans and Tranent

The Lords of his majesties privy Councill Haveing considered the within Report from the Sheriff of Haddingtoun, They heirby Recomend To his Majesties Advocat, To raise a process before their Lordships against the Heretors within the paroches of Prestonpanns and Tranent for their Disobedience and Neglect In not observeing of the Acts of Parliament, and Proclamationes of Councill for mantaining the poor, and That with his Lordships first Conveniency.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 56.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 56.

Letter: royal, 9 January 1700, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Nynth day of January Jaj viic years

A1700/1/61

Letter: royal

Letter from the King For Repriveing of John Frazer of Migavie and Hugh Frazer of Laucloyn

The Letter underwritten from his Majesty To the Lords of his privy Councill, Being Read, was ordered to be Recorded, wherof the Tenor follows.
Sic Supra Scribitur William Rex
Right Trusty and right welbeloved Cousin and Councillor Right trusty and Entirely beloved Cousin and Councellor, Right Trusty and welbeloved Cousines and Councillors, Right trusty and welbeloved Councillors, And Trusty and welbeloved Councellors. Wee greet yow well. We have considered the petition offered to us by John Frazer of Miggavie and Hugh Frazer of Leuchloin, Wherin they Represent That haveing been forfeited in absence and condemned to dy, For their accession to the Convocation of our Subjects raised by Captain Simeon Frazer. And haveing been afterwards taken, they are at present under Sentence of death, to be Executed the First day of December next; And Craving That in Consideration of their having been Sentenced to die in absence, and of other circumstances which pleads for our Royall mercy, We would think fitt To Reprive them, untill we may be fully Informed of their caice, It is therfore our will and pleasure, and we heirby authorize and Require yow, To grant a Reprive to the Said John and Hugh Frazers of the forsaid Sentence of death, till the Twentieth day of January next; And in the mean tyme yow are to Transmitt to us the full and clear State of that affair and of their concern therin That we may give Such further orders as well Shall Judge necessary, For doing wherof this Shall be your Warrant And so we bid yow heartily farewell. Given att our Court at Kensington The Twenty Fifth day of November i699, and of our Reign the Eleventh year. By his Majesties Command. Sic Subscribitur Seafeild.
2

Att Edinburgh The Nynth day of January Jaj viic years

A1700/1/61

Letter: royal

Letter from the King For Repriveing of John Frazer of Migavie and Hugh Frazer of Laucloyn

The Letter underwritten from his Majesty To the Lords of his privy Councill, Being Read, was ordered to be Recorded, wherof the Tenor follows.
Sic Supra Scribitur William Rex
Right Trusty and right welbeloved Cousin and Councillor Right trusty and Entirely beloved Cousin and Councellor, Right Trusty and welbeloved Cousines and Councillors, Right trusty and welbeloved Councillors, And Trusty and welbeloved Councellors. Wee greet yow well. We have considered the petition offered to us by John Frazer of Miggavie and Hugh Frazer of Leuchloin, Wherin they Represent That haveing been forfeited in absence and condemned to dy, For their accession to the Convocation of our Subjects raised by Captain Simeon Frazer. And haveing been afterwards taken, they are at present under Sentence of death, to be Executed the First day of December next; And Craving That in Consideration of their having been Sentenced to die in absence, and of other circumstances which pleads for our Royall mercy, We would think fitt To Reprive them, untill we may be fully Informed of their caice, It is therfore our will and pleasure, and we heirby authorize and Require yow, To grant a Reprive to the Said John and Hugh Frazers of the forsaid Sentence of death, till the Twentieth day of January next; And in the mean tyme yow are to Transmitt to us the full and clear State of that affair and of their concern therin That we may give Such further orders as well Shall Judge necessary, For doing wherof this Shall be your Warrant And so we bid yow heartily farewell. Given att our Court at Kensington The Twenty Fifth day of November i699, and of our Reign the Eleventh year. By his Majesties Command. Sic Subscribitur Seafeild.
2

1. NRS, PC1/52, 55.

2. Original marginal note: ‘The Reprive granted To John Frazer of Migavy and Hugh Frazer of Leachloyn in obedience to his Majesties Letter, was forgott here but booked per licet. after the last Councill day of february of this year’. However, now found at the end of the correct date of business.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 55.

2. Original marginal note: ‘The Reprive granted To John Frazer of Migavy and Hugh Frazer of Leachloyn in obedience to his Majesties Letter, was forgott here but booked per licet. after the last Councill day of february of this year’. However, now found at the end of the correct date of business.

Sederunt, 9 January 1700, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Nynth day of January Jaj viic years1

A1700/1/52

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Loudoun; Earl of Leven; Earl of Annandale; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Justice-Clerk; Lord Aberurchill; Lord Crosrigg; Lord Rankillor; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Stevensone; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Nynth day of January Jaj viic years1

A1700/1/52

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Loudoun; Earl of Leven; Earl of Annandale; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Justice-Clerk; Lord Aberurchill; Lord Crosrigg; Lord Rankillor; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Stevensone; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC1/52, 55.

2. NRS, PC1/52, 55-6.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 55.

2. NRS, PC1/52, 55-6.

Sederunt, 4 January 1700, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Fourth day of January Jaj viic years1

A1700/1/32

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Earl of Mar; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Leven; Earl of Annandale; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Justice-Clerk; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Halcraig; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Stevensone

Att Edinburgh The Fourth day of January Jaj viic years1

A1700/1/32

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Earl of Mar; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Leven; Earl of Annandale; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Justice-Clerk; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Halcraig; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Stevensone

1. NRS, PC1/52, 54.

2. NRS, PC1/52, 55.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 54.

2. NRS, PC1/52, 55.

Procedure, 2 January 1700, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Second day of January Jaj viic years

A1700/1/21

Procedure

Committee Anent Witches in the North Countrey

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Having Considered a Report of a Committee of their own number anent Witches in the North, with Margaret Monro and Agnes Warrick their Confessiones, They Find nothing proven against John Glass in Spittell and Mary Kylle in Fermtoish And Therfore Have assolzied and heirby assolzies them from that pairt of the criminall Lyble raised against them and Sentence given thereupon By the Commissioners appointed by the privy Councill, And gives order and warrand to the Magistrats of the Burgh of Fortrose within which the Saids Two persones are prisoners, or the Keepers of their Tolbooth, To Sett them att Liberty furth thereof, For which This Shall be a Sufficient warrant; And ordaines Letters of Horning on Twenty four houres To be direct heiron In form as Effeirs. And The Saids Lords Have Remitted and heirby Remitts To the Lords Advocat, Rankillor and Crossrigg who are the Comittee formerly appointed for considering the Process Led against their Witches, To Consider what arbitrary punishment, may be putt upon Margaret Monro, Mother to the said John Glass in Spittell Agnes Warrick in Killearnane, Christian Geylock in Conleog and Mary Glass in Newtown, And declares the Saids Margaret Monro, and Agnes Warrick free from the punishment or sentence of Death pronunced against them, By the Commissioners Contained in the Commission of Councill, And discharges the same to be putt to Execution And Recomends to the Said Committee, To meet to morrow att Ten in the forenoon, And declares any Two of them to be a Sufficient Quorum.

Att Edinburgh The Second day of January Jaj viic years

A1700/1/21

Procedure

Committee Anent Witches in the North Countrey

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Having Considered a Report of a Committee of their own number anent Witches in the North, with Margaret Monro and Agnes Warrick their Confessiones, They Find nothing proven against John Glass in Spittell and Mary Kylle in Fermtoish And Therfore Have assolzied and heirby assolzies them from that pairt of the criminall Lyble raised against them and Sentence given thereupon By the Commissioners appointed by the privy Councill, And gives order and warrand to the Magistrats of the Burgh of Fortrose within which the Saids Two persones are prisoners, or the Keepers of their Tolbooth, To Sett them att Liberty furth thereof, For which This Shall be a Sufficient warrant; And ordaines Letters of Horning on Twenty four houres To be direct heiron In form as Effeirs. And The Saids Lords Have Remitted and heirby Remitts To the Lords Advocat, Rankillor and Crossrigg who are the Comittee formerly appointed for considering the Process Led against their Witches, To Consider what arbitrary punishment, may be putt upon Margaret Monro, Mother to the said John Glass in Spittell Agnes Warrick in Killearnane, Christian Geylock in Conleog and Mary Glass in Newtown, And declares the Saids Margaret Monro, and Agnes Warrick free from the punishment or sentence of Death pronunced against them, By the Commissioners Contained in the Commission of Councill, And discharges the same to be putt to Execution And Recomends to the Said Committee, To meet to morrow att Ten in the forenoon, And declares any Two of them to be a Sufficient Quorum.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 54.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 54.

Sederunt, 2 January 1700, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Second day of January Jaj viic years1

A1700/1/12

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Mar; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Loudoun; Earl of Annandale; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Polwarth; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Justice-Clerk; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Rankillor; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Stevensone

Att Edinburgh The Second day of January Jaj viic years1

A1700/1/12

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Mar; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Loudoun; Earl of Annandale; Lord Jedburgh; Lord Polwarth; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Justice-Clerk; Lord Aberuchill; Lord Rankillor; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Stevensone

1. NRS, PC1/52, 54.

2. NRS, PC1/52, 54.

1. NRS, PC1/52, 54.

2. NRS, PC1/52, 54.

Act, 20 January 1699, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Twenty day of January Jaj vjc nynty and nyne years

A1699/1/141

Act

Act Anent William Cochran of Ferguslie

Anent The Petition given in to the Lords of his majesties privy Councill By Wiliam Cochran of Ferguslie Tacksman of the pole-money. Shewing That Conform to the power granted to their Lordships By the act of parliament Jaj vic nynty Eight years. Imposeing the polemoney, Their being a proclamation published appointing The Commissioners of Supply of the severall shires and magistrats of Burghs and their respective Clerks, To Compleat the Rolls and Lists of the poleable persons within their respective Bounds, and Transmitt the samen to the Lords of the Thesaury Betwixt and the first day of December Last, To the Effect the forsaids Rolls and Lists might be delivered to their petitioner, Betwixt or upon the Third Twesday of the said moneth And the said proclamation being of that same force and Import with the said act of parliament Their petitioner having by the Tack set to him of the polemoney the benefite not only of all the Clauses Exprest in the act of parliament, But furder of all the methods and Courses, Their Lordships shall think fitt to Appoint and lay down from tyme to tyme for the Effectuall Stating and Inbringing of the said polemoney Their petitioner in all humility craves Leave to Represent to their Lordships, That he humbly conceaves it was their Lordships meaning That the Roles and Lists of the poleable persons being the subject of his Tack ought in Law to have been put in his hands at the precise day prefixed, Both by the forsaid act of parliament and proclamation abovementioned as it was Expresly proposed and agreed to Before the Exchequer at taking and subscriving of the Tack, That the Books should be delivered in manner and at the day forsaid as may be yet recent with some of their Lordships, And if need beis Can be made appear by Evidence beyond Exception, so if it hade been otherways, And that their petitioner hade been oblidged to pay the Tack-duty with out Receaving the pole Books in due tyme, This hade been a Compendious way to run2 him in a method Contrair to all Law. For it is Known that the Setter of any tack of what Subject soever, Is oblidged to put the Tacksman in possession, otherways he is not only free of the Tack But the setter Lyable to him In Damnadges and as it wold never been Sustained in Law for the Setter of the Tack to pretend That it was sufficient for him to put the Tacksman in possession any tyme before the Tack Expired, so here their petitioner ought to have the benefite of ane ordinary Tacksman Especialy where res non Est Integra, In so far as the Commissioners and Magistrats Being oblidged to send in Rolls and the Lists Betwixt and the first of December Last, It is Impossible to Suppose any Reason why they did it not But Because the Lists were not at all made up within the tyme prescrived by Law or that they might add Such as did not class themselves in due tyme In Either of which caices their petitioner is Evidently prejudged of the quadruples of all these persons, to which he hes also good Right by his Tack, and the forsaid act of parliament and proclamation of Councill as to the polemoney it self, and it were ane burden and hardship both of Trouble and Expence beyond the value of the thing. And which their Lordships Knows Their petitioners Tack will never bear to put him to Tedious and Expensive process against every particular person Contained in their Rolls unduely made up, for distinguishing who are Tymously and Justly Classed and who not, And it does manifestly appear to have been their Lordships Intention at the Emitting of the forsaid proclamatione, That the negligence and fault of the Commissioners and magistrats and the prejudice ariseing by the not transmitting their Rolls and Lists in due tyme should noways be a burden upon their Petitioner, In so far as they are Certified That in caice they should fail to meet and make up the Lists or Transmitt the same to the Thesaury Betwixt and the day forsaid, They should be Conveened and prosecuted before their Lordships at the Instance of his majesties Advocate for their negligence to be punished for the same with all Severity. Wherby their Lordships having still reserved the manner and Effect of their punishment to their selves. It is humbly Conceaved It can never be Laid upon him, To Carry away a great pairt of the subject of his Tack or Exhaust him with Expence in prosecuteing the same, And if any poleable persones find himself prejudged by the Commissioner or Magistrat who did not report him as listed In due tyme, It is much Easier That they should seek Reparation from the Commissioners or Magistrats, Then for their petitioner first to prosecute the one, and then upon his being assolzied have his Recourse against the other by a Second process more Expensive Then the avail of the King, But furder it Is humbly Represented, That their Lordships by ane other proclamation dated The fifteenth of September Last, having appointed the Collectors of Supply To Collect the Polemoney Conform to the Books and Rolls That should be transmitted to them by their petitioner, And he having accordingly caused Transcribe all the Books That were delivered to him in due time, did send them by Expenses, To the several Collectors with orders to uplift the pole-money Conform thereto, Which Expenses would have served for carrieing the books now offered, as well as the Rest, when then can He whom their Lordships Knows to have no very profitable Tack be put to so unecessar Expence, Especialy when by the orders That now he must send, he must with his own hand Cut of another Considerable pairt of his tack, viz: The Doubles Incurred by not payment at the first of January or within Thirty days thereafter, which will necessarly be Elapsed before the Books can be transcribed and arrive at the Collectors hands of the Respective Bounds to which they belong Their being but Thirteen days to run, before the saids penalties Can be Incurred, And It being near a moneth after the day prefixed Viz: The first of December before any of the saids books arrived, It will be a hardship. It is hoped their Lordships will not Impose upon him to retreive their fault and negligence by so Evident a loss to himself Especialy when severalls of these Books came not In, till within these very few days Seeing Then Both by the act of parliament and their Lordships proclamations, as likeways by the nature of all Tacks as well as his, The Books and lists of the poleable persones as the Subject set ought to have been put in his possession at the days therein prefixed And It is Evident from their Lordships proclamations as well as from what was Communed at setting of the Tack, That he was not To Bear the Burden of the negligence and fault In not reporting and delivering of the books at the day prefixed. And That now res non est Integra the quadruples being already Incurred and the doubles Inevitablie to be Incurred for not paying within Thirty days after the First of January which will necessarly Elapse before the Books Can be transmitted to the Collectors and Intimationes made by them for payment which will Require some Competent time Before Collecting. It is Therfore hoped their Lordships will find Their petitioner no ways oblidged, To Receave the pole Books said now to be come in To the clerks of the Thesaury or otherways free him of the said tack altogether, To the Effect their Lordships and the Lords of his majesties Thesaury and Exchequer may make such Concessiones and grant such Eases to the Countrey, as well becomes their Lordships moderation, which the Greatness of the Tack-duty does utterly disinable their petitioner to do, Especialy to such a degree as this, which can Extend to no Less then a Third pairt of the whole Tack duty, But if their Lordships Think not fitt to free him of his Tack, Then it is humbly begged their Lordships may reconsider the Come or order of Councill, And find him no ways oblidged to Look after or Receave Bookes which cannot but be presumed to be unduely made as well as transmitted out of tyme. And Therfore Humbly craving to the Effect underwrittin as the said petition bears. The saids Lords of his majesties privy Councill Having considered this petition given in to them be the within Wiliam Cochran of Fergusly Tacksman of the pole wherupon their was a Committie appointed To have met this day But hes not mett, And It having gone to the vote whether the Tacksmen should be ordained to Take up the Books and Lists of poleable persons presently lying in the hands of Sir Thomas Moncreiff Clerk of his Majesties Thesaury It was carried in the Affirmative, And the saids Lords appoints the said Sir Thomas to make offer of the saids Lists and Rolls of poleable persons to the saids tacksmen, And ordains the Tacksmen Instantly to Receave and take up the samen.

Att Edinburgh The Twenty day of January Jaj vjc nynty and nyne years

A1699/1/141

Act

Act Anent William Cochran of Ferguslie

Anent The Petition given in to the Lords of his majesties privy Councill By Wiliam Cochran of Ferguslie Tacksman of the pole-money. Shewing That Conform to the power granted to their Lordships By the act of parliament Jaj vic nynty Eight years. Imposeing the polemoney, Their being a proclamation published appointing The Commissioners of Supply of the severall shires and magistrats of Burghs and their respective Clerks, To Compleat the Rolls and Lists of the poleable persons within their respective Bounds, and Transmitt the samen to the Lords of the Thesaury Betwixt and the first day of December Last, To the Effect the forsaids Rolls and Lists might be delivered to their petitioner, Betwixt or upon the Third Twesday of the said moneth And the said proclamation being of that same force and Import with the said act of parliament Their petitioner having by the Tack set to him of the polemoney the benefite not only of all the Clauses Exprest in the act of parliament, But furder of all the methods and Courses, Their Lordships shall think fitt to Appoint and lay down from tyme to tyme for the Effectuall Stating and Inbringing of the said polemoney Their petitioner in all humility craves Leave to Represent to their Lordships, That he humbly conceaves it was their Lordships meaning That the Roles and Lists of the poleable persons being the subject of his Tack ought in Law to have been put in his hands at the precise day prefixed, Both by the forsaid act of parliament and proclamation abovementioned as it was Expresly proposed and agreed to Before the Exchequer at taking and subscriving of the Tack, That the Books should be delivered in manner and at the day forsaid as may be yet recent with some of their Lordships, And if need beis Can be made appear by Evidence beyond Exception, so if it hade been otherways, And that their petitioner hade been oblidged to pay the Tack-duty with out Receaving the pole Books in due tyme, This hade been a Compendious way to run2 him in a method Contrair to all Law. For it is Known that the Setter of any tack of what Subject soever, Is oblidged to put the Tacksman in possession, otherways he is not only free of the Tack But the setter Lyable to him In Damnadges and as it wold never been Sustained in Law for the Setter of the Tack to pretend That it was sufficient for him to put the Tacksman in possession any tyme before the Tack Expired, so here their petitioner ought to have the benefite of ane ordinary Tacksman Especialy where res non Est Integra, In so far as the Commissioners and Magistrats Being oblidged to send in Rolls and the Lists Betwixt and the first of December Last, It is Impossible to Suppose any Reason why they did it not But Because the Lists were not at all made up within the tyme prescrived by Law or that they might add Such as did not class themselves in due tyme In Either of which caices their petitioner is Evidently prejudged of the quadruples of all these persons, to which he hes also good Right by his Tack, and the forsaid act of parliament and proclamation of Councill as to the polemoney it self, and it were ane burden and hardship both of Trouble and Expence beyond the value of the thing. And which their Lordships Knows Their petitioners Tack will never bear to put him to Tedious and Expensive process against every particular person Contained in their Rolls unduely made up, for distinguishing who are Tymously and Justly Classed and who not, And it does manifestly appear to have been their Lordships Intention at the Emitting of the forsaid proclamatione, That the negligence and fault of the Commissioners and magistrats and the prejudice ariseing by the not transmitting their Rolls and Lists in due tyme should noways be a burden upon their Petitioner, In so far as they are Certified That in caice they should fail to meet and make up the Lists or Transmitt the same to the Thesaury Betwixt and the day forsaid, They should be Conveened and prosecuted before their Lordships at the Instance of his majesties Advocate for their negligence to be punished for the same with all Severity. Wherby their Lordships having still reserved the manner and Effect of their punishment to their selves. It is humbly Conceaved It can never be Laid upon him, To Carry away a great pairt of the subject of his Tack or Exhaust him with Expence in prosecuteing the same, And if any poleable persones find himself prejudged by the Commissioner or Magistrat who did not report him as listed In due tyme, It is much Easier That they should seek Reparation from the Commissioners or Magistrats, Then for their petitioner first to prosecute the one, and then upon his being assolzied have his Recourse against the other by a Second process more Expensive Then the avail of the King, But furder it Is humbly Represented, That their Lordships by ane other proclamation dated The fifteenth of September Last, having appointed the Collectors of Supply To Collect the Polemoney Conform to the Books and Rolls That should be transmitted to them by their petitioner, And he having accordingly caused Transcribe all the Books That were delivered to him in due time, did send them by Expenses, To the several Collectors with orders to uplift the pole-money Conform thereto, Which Expenses would have served for carrieing the books now offered, as well as the Rest, when then can He whom their Lordships Knows to have no very profitable Tack be put to so unecessar Expence, Especialy when by the orders That now he must send, he must with his own hand Cut of another Considerable pairt of his tack, viz: The Doubles Incurred by not payment at the first of January or within Thirty days thereafter, which will necessarly be Elapsed before the Books can be transcribed and arrive at the Collectors hands of the Respective Bounds to which they belong Their being but Thirteen days to run, before the saids penalties Can be Incurred, And It being near a moneth after the day prefixed Viz: The first of December before any of the saids books arrived, It will be a hardship. It is hoped their Lordships will not Impose upon him to retreive their fault and negligence by so Evident a loss to himself Especialy when severalls of these Books came not In, till within these very few days Seeing Then Both by the act of parliament and their Lordships proclamations, as likeways by the nature of all Tacks as well as his, The Books and lists of the poleable persones as the Subject set ought to have been put in his possession at the days therein prefixed And It is Evident from their Lordships proclamations as well as from what was Communed at setting of the Tack, That he was not To Bear the Burden of the negligence and fault In not reporting and delivering of the books at the day prefixed. And That now res non est Integra the quadruples being already Incurred and the doubles Inevitablie to be Incurred for not paying within Thirty days after the First of January which will necessarly Elapse before the Books Can be transmitted to the Collectors and Intimationes made by them for payment which will Require some Competent time Before Collecting. It is Therfore hoped their Lordships will find Their petitioner no ways oblidged, To Receave the pole Books said now to be come in To the clerks of the Thesaury or otherways free him of the said tack altogether, To the Effect their Lordships and the Lords of his majesties Thesaury and Exchequer may make such Concessiones and grant such Eases to the Countrey, as well becomes their Lordships moderation, which the Greatness of the Tack-duty does utterly disinable their petitioner to do, Especialy to such a degree as this, which can Extend to no Less then a Third pairt of the whole Tack duty, But if their Lordships Think not fitt to free him of his Tack, Then it is humbly begged their Lordships may reconsider the Come or order of Councill, And find him no ways oblidged to Look after or Receave Bookes which cannot but be presumed to be unduely made as well as transmitted out of tyme. And Therfore Humbly craving to the Effect underwrittin as the said petition bears. The saids Lords of his majesties privy Councill Having considered this petition given in to them be the within Wiliam Cochran of Fergusly Tacksman of the pole wherupon their was a Committie appointed To have met this day But hes not mett, And It having gone to the vote whether the Tacksmen should be ordained to Take up the Books and Lists of poleable persons presently lying in the hands of Sir Thomas Moncreiff Clerk of his Majesties Thesaury It was carried in the Affirmative, And the saids Lords appoints the said Sir Thomas to make offer of the saids Lists and Rolls of poleable persons to the saids tacksmen, And ordains the Tacksmen Instantly to Receave and take up the samen.

1. NRS, PC1/51, 521-4.

2. Sic.. Presumably an error for ‘ruin’

1. NRS, PC1/51, 521-4.

2. Sic.. Presumably an error for ‘ruin’

Sederunt, 20 January 1699, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Twenty day of January Jaj vjc nynty and nyne years1

A1699/1/132

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Duke of Queensberrie P.S.; Earl of Argylle; Earl of Mar; Earl of Morton; Earl of Loudoun; Earl of Leven; Earl of Annandale; Earl of Northesk; Lord Strathnaver; Lord President of Session; Lord Advocate; Lord Crosrigg; Laird of Stevensone; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh The Twenty day of January Jaj vjc nynty and nyne years1

A1699/1/132

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Duke of Queensberrie P.S.; Earl of Argylle; Earl of Mar; Earl of Morton; Earl of Loudoun; Earl of Leven; Earl of Annandale; Earl of Northesk; Lord Strathnaver; Lord President of Session; Lord Advocate; Lord Crosrigg; Laird of Stevensone; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC1/51, 521.

2. NRS, PC1/51, 521.

1. NRS, PC1/51, 521.

2. NRS, PC1/51, 521.