Decreet, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years

D1693/1/271

Decreet

Interloquitor anent the stipends of Innverness

The Lords of their majesties privy Councill haveing heard a Petition given in to them be Mr Alexander Southerland with another given in be Mr John Stewart and answers made to each petition hic inde with another given in be the magistrats of Innverness in favors of Mr Thomas Frazer with a declaratione in favors of the said Mr Alexander Southerland And they being informed that the patronadge of the kirk of Innverness does belong to the Earle of Seaforth and Laird of Streichens per vices, And that it is the Laird of Strichens turne to present at this time They Declair they will allow the stipend to any of the parties contending who shall produce Strichens gift or Consent Incaise it be Strichens turne to present, And if it be not his bot the Earle of Seaforths turne Then the saids Lords Declaires they will farder advyse how the said stipend how the said stipend2 shall be Imployed In respect the Earle is a papist.

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years

D1693/1/271

Decreet

Interloquitor anent the stipends of Innverness

The Lords of their majesties privy Councill haveing heard a Petition given in to them be Mr Alexander Southerland with another given in be Mr John Stewart and answers made to each petition hic inde with another given in be the magistrats of Innverness in favors of Mr Thomas Frazer with a declaratione in favors of the said Mr Alexander Southerland And they being informed that the patronadge of the kirk of Innverness does belong to the Earle of Seaforth and Laird of Streichens per vices, And that it is the Laird of Strichens turne to present at this time They Declair they will allow the stipend to any of the parties contending who shall produce Strichens gift or Consent Incaise it be Strichens turne to present, And if it be not his bot the Earle of Seaforths turne Then the saids Lords Declaires they will farder advyse how the said stipend how the said stipend2 shall be Imployed In respect the Earle is a papist.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 162v.

2. Sic.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 162v.

2. Sic.

Act, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years

D1693/1/261

Act

Act Countess Dowager of Lauderdale.

Anent a Petition given in the Lords of their majesties privy Councill be Elizabeth Countes Douager of Lauderdale Shewing That the petitioner haveing raised a Complaint before the saids Lords against the present Countes of Lauderdale for her Illegall and unwarrantable turneing the petitioner out of the possession of Thirlstaine Castle parks and others therto belonging and takeing and detaineing from her the cornes houshold furnitur and body cloathes etc wherof she was in the2 queit and peaceable possession since her husbands decease, And the grounds of her Complaint being unquestionably relevant and against which the present Countes could alledge no defence yet Compeirance being made for the Lord Yester as a Creditor to the late Duke of Lauderdale, And both his and the Countes procurators haveing Craved that the wholl grounds of his Complaint might be remitted to the Lords of Session to be sumarly Discust before them ware pleased to Remitt all the grounds of that Complaint to be intirely discust before the sessione notwithstanding quherof ther is ane act extracted Remitting to the Lords of Sessione to Discuss first the point of right sumarly without any relatione either to her repossession or restitution of her moveables Bu which the petitioner humbly conceaves her self to be greived Because primo this referrence haveing only proceided upon the account of the Lord Yester his Compeiring and Concurring with the defender His Lordship did never pretend nor Crave to have her Lybell divyded naither did the Countes her self or her procurators Crave any such thing Bot on the contrare the Countes by her answers and the Lord Yester procurators at the barr, Did Crave that the Cognitione of the grounds of her complaint might be intirely Remitted to the sessione secundo if the point of right only and not the point of possessione should be remitted to be Determined be the Lords of sessione after their Lordships had given their determinatione anent the point of right The petitioner would againe be put to the trouble and expence of a new process to have the point of possession determined, And seing the petitioner is Credibly informed that the saids Lords designe in granting that Remitt was that the Lords of sessione should Cognose and determine upon the haill grounds of the said Complaint both as to the point of possessione and point of right according to the usuall course and Order of Law, And Therfore humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be pleased to declair what was their opinion in granting the forsaid reference And aither to allow a tryall to be taken of the haill grounds of her Complaint before the saids Lords Or otherwayes to remitt her Complaint intirely as it is Lybelled to be Cognosied and determined be the Lords of session as the petitione bears The Lords of their majesties privy Councill Haveing Considered this petition given in to them be the above Countess of Lauderdale with a paper given in by the Countess, Wherby she declynes the Lord high Chancelor from voteing in this affair In Respect ther is appearance made for the Lord Yester his Sone in this matter, They Refuse to Sustaine the Declinator the Lord high Chancelor being last in voteing And his Lordships haveing Declared that if it come to his Casting vote he shall not give his vote, And the saids Lords haveing heard and Considered their former interloquitor They Adhere therto as the samen stands subscryved by the Lord high chancelor.

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years

D1693/1/261

Act

Act Countess Dowager of Lauderdale.

Anent a Petition given in the Lords of their majesties privy Councill be Elizabeth Countes Douager of Lauderdale Shewing That the petitioner haveing raised a Complaint before the saids Lords against the present Countes of Lauderdale for her Illegall and unwarrantable turneing the petitioner out of the possession of Thirlstaine Castle parks and others therto belonging and takeing and detaineing from her the cornes houshold furnitur and body cloathes etc wherof she was in the2 queit and peaceable possession since her husbands decease, And the grounds of her Complaint being unquestionably relevant and against which the present Countes could alledge no defence yet Compeirance being made for the Lord Yester as a Creditor to the late Duke of Lauderdale, And both his and the Countes procurators haveing Craved that the wholl grounds of his Complaint might be remitted to the Lords of Session to be sumarly Discust before them ware pleased to Remitt all the grounds of that Complaint to be intirely discust before the sessione notwithstanding quherof ther is ane act extracted Remitting to the Lords of Sessione to Discuss first the point of right sumarly without any relatione either to her repossession or restitution of her moveables Bu which the petitioner humbly conceaves her self to be greived Because primo this referrence haveing only proceided upon the account of the Lord Yester his Compeiring and Concurring with the defender His Lordship did never pretend nor Crave to have her Lybell divyded naither did the Countes her self or her procurators Crave any such thing Bot on the contrare the Countes by her answers and the Lord Yester procurators at the barr, Did Crave that the Cognitione of the grounds of her complaint might be intirely Remitted to the sessione secundo if the point of right only and not the point of possessione should be remitted to be Determined be the Lords of sessione after their Lordships had given their determinatione anent the point of right The petitioner would againe be put to the trouble and expence of a new process to have the point of possession determined, And seing the petitioner is Credibly informed that the saids Lords designe in granting that Remitt was that the Lords of sessione should Cognose and determine upon the haill grounds of the said Complaint both as to the point of possessione and point of right according to the usuall course and Order of Law, And Therfore humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be pleased to declair what was their opinion in granting the forsaid reference And aither to allow a tryall to be taken of the haill grounds of her Complaint before the saids Lords Or otherwayes to remitt her Complaint intirely as it is Lybelled to be Cognosied and determined be the Lords of session as the petitione bears The Lords of their majesties privy Councill Haveing Considered this petition given in to them be the above Countess of Lauderdale with a paper given in by the Countess, Wherby she declynes the Lord high Chancelor from voteing in this affair In Respect ther is appearance made for the Lord Yester his Sone in this matter, They Refuse to Sustaine the Declinator the Lord high Chancelor being last in voteing And his Lordships haveing Declared that if it come to his Casting vote he shall not give his vote, And the saids Lords haveing heard and Considered their former interloquitor They Adhere therto as the samen stands subscryved by the Lord high chancelor.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 161v-162r.

2. Insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 161v-162r.

2. Insertion.

Act, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years

D1693/1/251

Act

Act Captain Mckay Against Mcphersone and McConny.

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councill be Captain Heugh Mckay Shewing That quheras the master of Forbes one of the saids Lords number haveing by his missive ordered the petitioner to seaze upon and secure Shaw of Dalnavert Collin Breck and Kenneth Dow and severall others, as being persones accessorie to severall robberies and depredationes Comitted within his bounds The fornamed Kenneth Dow and John Mckermude his accomplices in the beginning of December last Resorting about the Blair of Atholl were apprehended and secured by a serjant in the petitioners Company In pursuance of the forsaid warrand from the Master of Forbes, And after being some short time detained in the garisone of Blair, The fornamed Kenneth Dow and John Mckermude did voluntarly take one with the petitioner in his majesties service, and made no deficultie to continue therin, untill that they ware informed that the petitioner was to draw out a part of his Company for recruiteing his Majesties armie in Flanders, And they being conveyed to Fyfe with other recruites designed for that service found means to make their Escape from those that guarded the recruites, And therafter ware conduced and taken on voluntarly by Livt Meinzies in Coll Monroes Regiment in presence of the magistrats of Bruntisland as their Certificat theranent has evidenced, notwithstanding wherof ane Clamerous Complaint was presented to the saids Lords against the petitioner by Lauchlane Mcintosh of Stroan and Alexander Mcpherson of Phiness as if the fornamed John Mckermude and Keneth Dow hade been unwarantably and violently seized by the petitioner upon whose suggestiones the petitioner was ordained to exhibit the fornamed persones before the Committie within twentie four hours under the paine of Rebellion the falseness and Calumineous of which Complaint would appear evidently, when the saids Lords would be pleased to Consider that the first apprehending and seizure was by warrand and from the Master of Forbes a privy Councellor, are persones accessorie to the Robberies and depredationes within his bounds And that to evit the danger and trouble therof they hade voluntarly taken on with the petitioner for his Majesties service as would be proven by most unsuspected witnesses residing about the Blair of Atholl, And therafter when they were conveyed with the other recruites haveing made their escape from such as guarded the recruites before any intatione was given to the petitioner anent them So that it was Imposible for him to present them before the Committie at the time prefixed be the forsaid charge And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords to suspend and Discharge the letters raised and execute against the petitioner in the forsaid matter and relax him from the horn to which he has been denunced for the Causes forsaid in Respect that he has proceided legally and warrantablie in secureing of the forsaid persones in maner above represented as the petition bears The Lords of their Majesties privy Councill. Haveing Considered this petition given in to them be the above Captain Heugh Mckay with another petition given in to them be the above Kenneth Dow and John Mckony with the writtes produced for either partie, And particullarly a testificat be the baillies of Bruntisland bearing that the said Keneth Dow and John Mckony did take on with Ensigne Meinzies without being forced and received money from him with the report of a Committie of their oun number to whom2 the consideratione of this matter was Remitted, They heirby Ordaine the saids Keneth Dow and John Mckony to continue prisoners in the Tolbooth of the Canongate as Souldiers ingadged with the said Ensigne Meinzies for Flanders Untill the convoy appointed to accompany the transport ships be aryved but prejudice to the saids persones or any concerned for them to insiest against the baillies of Bruntisland subscryved of the forsaid testificat aither as falsifiers or Forgers of the testificat or for any illegall or indirect practises against the saids two persones.

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years

D1693/1/251

Act

Act Captain Mckay Against Mcphersone and McConny.

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councill be Captain Heugh Mckay Shewing That quheras the master of Forbes one of the saids Lords number haveing by his missive ordered the petitioner to seaze upon and secure Shaw of Dalnavert Collin Breck and Kenneth Dow and severall others, as being persones accessorie to severall robberies and depredationes Comitted within his bounds The fornamed Kenneth Dow and John Mckermude his accomplices in the beginning of December last Resorting about the Blair of Atholl were apprehended and secured by a serjant in the petitioners Company In pursuance of the forsaid warrand from the Master of Forbes, And after being some short time detained in the garisone of Blair, The fornamed Kenneth Dow and John Mckermude did voluntarly take one with the petitioner in his majesties service, and made no deficultie to continue therin, untill that they ware informed that the petitioner was to draw out a part of his Company for recruiteing his Majesties armie in Flanders, And they being conveyed to Fyfe with other recruites designed for that service found means to make their Escape from those that guarded the recruites, And therafter ware conduced and taken on voluntarly by Livt Meinzies in Coll Monroes Regiment in presence of the magistrats of Bruntisland as their Certificat theranent has evidenced, notwithstanding wherof ane Clamerous Complaint was presented to the saids Lords against the petitioner by Lauchlane Mcintosh of Stroan and Alexander Mcpherson of Phiness as if the fornamed John Mckermude and Keneth Dow hade been unwarantably and violently seized by the petitioner upon whose suggestiones the petitioner was ordained to exhibit the fornamed persones before the Committie within twentie four hours under the paine of Rebellion the falseness and Calumineous of which Complaint would appear evidently, when the saids Lords would be pleased to Consider that the first apprehending and seizure was by warrand and from the Master of Forbes a privy Councellor, are persones accessorie to the Robberies and depredationes within his bounds And that to evit the danger and trouble therof they hade voluntarly taken on with the petitioner for his Majesties service as would be proven by most unsuspected witnesses residing about the Blair of Atholl, And therafter when they were conveyed with the other recruites haveing made their escape from such as guarded the recruites before any intatione was given to the petitioner anent them So that it was Imposible for him to present them before the Committie at the time prefixed be the forsaid charge And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords to suspend and Discharge the letters raised and execute against the petitioner in the forsaid matter and relax him from the horn to which he has been denunced for the Causes forsaid in Respect that he has proceided legally and warrantablie in secureing of the forsaid persones in maner above represented as the petition bears The Lords of their Majesties privy Councill. Haveing Considered this petition given in to them be the above Captain Heugh Mckay with another petition given in to them be the above Kenneth Dow and John Mckony with the writtes produced for either partie, And particullarly a testificat be the baillies of Bruntisland bearing that the said Keneth Dow and John Mckony did take on with Ensigne Meinzies without being forced and received money from him with the report of a Committie of their oun number to whom2 the consideratione of this matter was Remitted, They heirby Ordaine the saids Keneth Dow and John Mckony to continue prisoners in the Tolbooth of the Canongate as Souldiers ingadged with the said Ensigne Meinzies for Flanders Untill the convoy appointed to accompany the transport ships be aryved but prejudice to the saids persones or any concerned for them to insiest against the baillies of Bruntisland subscryved of the forsaid testificat aither as falsifiers or Forgers of the testificat or for any illegall or indirect practises against the saids two persones.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 160v-161v.

2. Insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 160v-161v.

2. Insertion.

Petition, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years

D1693/1/241

Petition

[Petition Cochran of Killmarnovk]

Petition Cochran of Killmaronock and others Craveing two men in the watch allowed to be keeped be them in Stirling Shyre to be altered and other two to be put in their place Read and appoints the former act of Councill anent this Watch and the instructiones to be Looked out against the nixt Councill day And Recomends to the Earle of Brodalbine and Viscount of Tarbat to Consider the wholl bussines and Report.

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years

D1693/1/241

Petition

[Petition Cochran of Killmarnovk]

Petition Cochran of Killmaronock and others Craveing two men in the watch allowed to be keeped be them in Stirling Shyre to be altered and other two to be put in their place Read and appoints the former act of Councill anent this Watch and the instructiones to be Looked out against the nixt Councill day And Recomends to the Earle of Brodalbine and Viscount of Tarbat to Consider the wholl bussines and Report.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 160v.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 160v.

Sederunt, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years1

D1693/1/232

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Duke of Hamilton president; Earl of Melvill P: S:; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Strathmore; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Brodalbine; Viscount Tarbat; Viscount Stair; Lord Raith Lord Cardross; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Carmicheall; Master of Forbes; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Hatton; Lord Fountonhall; Lord Enstruther; Mr Fr: Montgomrie; Laird of Grant; Laird of Blackbarrony; Laird of Stivenson; Laird of Pollock; Sir William Lockhart; Sir Patrick Murray

Edinburgh the Nynteinth day of January Jaj vjc nyntie thrie years1

D1693/1/232

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Duke of Hamilton president; Earl of Melvill P: S:; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Strathmore; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Brodalbine; Viscount Tarbat; Viscount Stair; Lord Raith Lord Cardross; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Carmicheall; Master of Forbes; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Hatton; Lord Fountonhall; Lord Enstruther; Mr Fr: Montgomrie; Laird of Grant; Laird of Blackbarrony; Laird of Stivenson; Laird of Pollock; Sir William Lockhart; Sir Patrick Murray

1. NRS, PC2/24, 160r.

2. NRS, PC2/24, 160r.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 160r.

2. NRS, PC2/24, 160r.

Warrant, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the nynteinth day of Januarij Jaj vjc nyntie three years

A1693/1/371

Warrant

Warrand to the shirreff of Fyff for apprehending Mrs Edward, Wood and Balfour ministers in Fyff

The Lords of there Majesties privie Councill being Informed That Mr Alexander Edward minister at Kemback Mr William Wood Minister at Duninno and Mr Hendrie Balfour minister at Auchtertooll who were formerly cited befor the Councill for not prayeing for there majesties King William and Queen Mary and Certificatione Granted againest them for not Compearance And who are since denunced and registrat doe still Continow and preach in there churches and doe not pray for King William and Queen Mary The saids Lords of there majesties privy Councill appoints Sir William Lockhart there majesties sollicitor to raise and execute Captione against them And in the mean tyme Gives order and warrand to the Shirreff principall of the shyre of Fyff and his depute to seize and secure the saids three ministers and send them prisoners to the tolbooth of Edinburgh And appoints to receave and detaine them therein till farder order of Councill.

At Edinburgh, 19 January 1693

A1693/1/371

Warrant

Warrant to the sheriff of Fife for apprehending Messrs Edward, Wood and Balfour, ministers in Fife

The lords of their majesties’ privy council being informed that Mr Alexander Edward, minister at Kemback, Mr William Wood, minister at Dunino, and Mr Henry Balfour, minister at Auchtertool, who were formerly cited before the council for not praying for their majesties King William and Queen Mary and certification granted against them for non-appearance, and who are since denounced and registered, continue to preach in their churches and do not pray for King William and Queen Mary; the said lords of their majesties’ privy council appoint Sir William Lockhart, their majesties’ solicitor, to raise and execute caption against them and in the meantime the give order and warrant to the sheriff principal of the shire of Fife and his depute to seize and secure the said three ministers and send them as prisoners to the tolbooth of Edinburgh, and they will receive and detain them therein until further order of council.

1. PC1/48, 561-2.

1. PC1/48, 561-2.

Decreet, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the nynteinth day of Januarij Jaj vjc nyntie three years

A1693/1/361

Decreet

Decreet There Majesties Sollicitor against ministers in Berwickshire

Anent the2 Lybell or Complaint raised and persued befor the Lords of there majesties privie Councill at the Instance of Sir William Lockhart there majesties sollicitor for there Highness interest in the matter underwritten Mentioneing That where albeit by the Law of God and the principles and constitutiones of everie well governed natione all persones are bound to give due obedience thereto And wish well and pray for Such as whom they owe Just obedience and true alleadgeance as there Soveraigne Especiallie such who have been the glorious Instruments of there delyverance from the thraldome of popery and the pernicious Inconvenience that accompany ane arbitrarie power And by the municipall Constitutiones of this Realme all the subjects thereof are engadged to pray for there Lawfull soveraigne And particularly by ane act of the meeting of the estates daitted the thretteinth day of Apryll Jaj vjc Eighty Nyne years All Ministers Who are in any eminent maner obleidged to discharge that duety are thereby expressly Commanded To read the proclamation of that dait and publictly to pray for there majesties King William and Queen Mary as King and Queen of this realme upon the dayes thereinmentioned under the pain of being depryved, Losseing of there benefices And by the same proclamtione all the Leedges are Certifyed That they presume not to oune or acknowledge the Late King James the seventh for there King or presume upon ther highest perrill by word, wreitting, in a sermone or any other maner of way to Impugne or dissoune there majesties as Kinge3 and Queen of Scotland And by the threttie fyfth act of the second sessione of there majesties current parliament all ministers depryved for not praying publictly for there majesties as King and Queen of this realme and for not reading the said proclamatione of the Estates are prohibited and discharged to preach or exercise any pairt of the Ministeriall functione aither in Church or meeting house upon any pretext whatsomever untill first they present themselves befor the Lords of there majesties privie Councill And there in there presence take Swear and subscryve the oath of alleadgeance and assureance to there Majesties as King and Queen of this realme and not to oune the Late King James as there King In any sort Conforme to the tenor of the said proclamation Certifyeing such ministers doeing the contrarie They shall be proceeded againest as persones disaffected and enemies to there majesties Government And shall be purged with all rigor And thereby ordained the said proclamatione and act of the meeting of the Estates to be put to farder executione againest all such ministers who have not as yet given obedience thereto By praying for there majesties In maner forsaid And ordained the saids Lords of privie Councill to proceed therein And by diverse and sundrie proclamationes of the saids Lords The particular dayes of Thanksgiveing and for fasting mentioned therein Nevertheless Mr James Lautie Minister at Chirnsyde Mr Adam Waddell minister at Witsome Mr Robert Bowman minister at the abbay of St Bathans Mr Alexander Douglas Late minister at Coldinghame Mr George Wilsone Late minister att Woolstruther and Mr Thomas Blair late minister at Lennell all within the Shirreffdome of Berwick Albeit some of them have been publictly depryved for not praying for there majesties In the termes of the act of parliament have publictly preached and exercised the ministeriall functione within there oune respective houses and paroches where the Same Lyes and else where without qualifyeing themselves according to Law By Swearing and signeing the oath of alleadgeance And engadgeing not to oune the Late King James And have not prayed for there majesties In such Circumstantiat termes as there hearers might have knowen that they prayed for there majesties King William and Queen Mary as King and Queen And have been so farr from evidenceing the sense they ought to have hade of there majesties preservatione and releiff of the grievous Circumstances the Nation then Lay under That when the proclamatione of the estates went to them At least came to there hands or of which They hade knowledge They were so farr from testifyeing there gratitude In giveing due obedience thereto That nether the day appointed nor at any tyme since syne did they read any of the saids proclamationes for thanksgiving or fast Albeit all these were delyvered to there hands But on the Contrarie In contempt of these proclamationes hes actually preached dayly since syne without praying for there majesties as King and Queen of this Realme Convocating severall paroches Stirring up and fomenting there dissaffectione to the government Encouradgeing our Enemyes and discourageing of our Loyall subjects sometymes not only praying for the Late King James And that God would restore him and make his croun to flourish upon his head But also at other tymes to pray In such ambiguous termes That there hearers could not understand That they prayed for there majesties off all which crymes The forsaids persones are guilty actors airt and pairt And ought and should be severely punished in there persones and goods to the terror of others to doe the Lyke in tyme comeing And Anent the Charge Given to the haill forenamed persones above Compleaned upon To have Compeared befor the saids Lords of privie Councill at ane certain day bygone To have ansuered to the grounds of the above wreitten complaint And to hav heard and seen such order and course taken thereanent as the saids Lords should find Just under the paine of rebellione and putting of them to the horne with Certification to them If they failzie They should be denunced rebells and put to the horne And there majesties other Letters Shoud be direct furth againest them for that effect As the said Lybell and executiones thereof bears. Which Being Called In presence of the saids Lords of there Majesties privie Councill upon the seventeenth day of Januarij Instant And Sir James Stewart there Majesties advocat compearing personally for there Highness Interest And the haill defenders (except the said Mr George Wilsone Late minister at Woolstruther) Compearing also personally The saids Lords Granted Certificatione againest the said Mr George Wilsone for his absence and not Compearance and ordained Letters to be direct to messengers at armes To pass to the mercat Croce of […] and other places needfull And there In there majesties names and authority Duely Lawfully and orderly denunce the said Mr George Wilsone there majesties rebell and put him to there Highness horne And ordaine all his moveable goods and gear to be escheitt and Inbrought to there majesties use for his contemptione and dissobedience And the rest of the defenders being examined upon the points of the Lybell Declared Conforme to there declarationes extant in process The saids Lords of privie Councill Superceeded the advyseing of this process of pronunceing any sentence therein untill there next Councill day The Saids Lords of there majesties privie Councill Haveing this day Considered the forsaid Lybell with the declarationes of the ministers defenders Compearing as said is They Find by the declaration of Mr Robert Bowmaker minister at St Bathans. That he hes prayed for there Majesties King William and Queen Mary by name And that he hes keept the fasts and thanksgiveings and therefore assoilzies him And Finds by the declaratione of Mr James Lautie late minister at Chirnsyde Mr Alexander Douglas late minister at Coldinghame and Mr Thomas Blair late minister at Lennell That they have preached since they were depryved But Finds that they have not prayed for there majesties King William and Queen Mary And therefore discharges them to preach or exercise any pairt of the ministeriall functione aither in churches meetinghouses or any other places whatsomever untill they qualifie themselves in the termes of the act of parliament with certificatione If they failzie In Giveing punctuall obedience hereto The pains and punishments contained in the acts of parliament shall be Inflicted againest them without favour or farder delay And the saids Lords declares That by the Incurring the Certificatione in the act of parliament (which is to be proceeded againest as persones dissaffected and enemyes to there Majesties Government) The Saids Ministers will be Lyable to fyneing Imprisonement or banishment And as to Mr Adam Waddell minister at Whistome Superceeds to give sentence againest him untill he gave in to the Councill In wreitting under his hand the termes In which he prayes for King and Queen whereby his hearers doe understand he means King William and Queen Mary And Lykewayes how Long he hes prayed in these termes And appoints Intimatione to be made to him to give in the said wreitting the next Councill day.

At Edinburgh, 19 January 1693

A1693/1/361

Decreet

Decreet: Their majesties’ solicitor against ministers in Berwickshire

Concerning the libel or complaint raised and pursued before the lords of their majesties’ privy council at the instance of Sir William Lockhart, their majesties’ solicitor, for their highnesses’ interest in the matter underwritten, mentioning that where albeit by the law of God and the principles and constitutions of every well governed nation, all persons are bound to give due obedience thereto and wish well and pray for such as whom they owe just obedience and true allegiance as their sovereign, especially such who have been the glorious instruments of their deliverance from the thraldom of Catholicism and the pernicious inconveniences that accompany an arbitrary power, and by the municipal constitutions of this realm all the subjects thereof are engaged to pray for their lawful sovereign and particularly by an act of the meeting of the estates dated 13 April 1689, all ministers who are in any eminent manner obliged to discharge that duty are thereby expressly commanded to read the proclamation of that date and publicly pray for their majesties King William and Queen Mary as king and queen of this realm upon the days therein mentioned under the pain of being deprived, losing of their benefices, and by the same proclamation all the lieges are certified that they presume not to own or acknowledge the late King James VII as their king or presume upon their highest peril by word, writing, in a sermon or any other manner of way to impugn or disown their majesties as king and queen of Scotland, and by the thirty-fifth act of the second session of their majesties’ current parliament all ministers deprived for not praying publicly for their majesties as king and queen of this realm and for not reading the said proclamation of the estates are prohibited and discharged to preach or exercise any part of the ministerial function, either in church or meeting house upon any pretext whatsoever until they present themselves before the lords of their majesties’ privy council and there in their presence take, swear and subscribe the oath of allegiance and assurance to their majesties as king and queen of this realm and not to own the late King James as their king in any way, according to the tenor of the said proclamation, certifying that such ministers doing the contrary shall be proceeded against as persons disaffected and enemies to their majesties’ government, and shall be purged with all rigor And thereby ordained the said proclamation and act of the meeting of the estates to be put to further execution against all such ministers who have not as yet given obedience thereto by praying for their majesties in manner foresaid, and ordered the said lords of privy council to proceed therein and by diverse and sundry proclamations of the said lords, the particular days of thanksgiving and for fasting mentioned therein, nevertheless Mr James Lawtie, minister at Chirnside, Mr Adam Waddell, minister at Whitsome, Mr Robert Bowman minister of Abbey St Bathans, Mr Alexander Douglas, former minister of Coldingham, Mr George Wilson, former minister at Westruther and Mr Thomas Blair, former minister at Lennall, all within the sheriffdom of Berwick, albeit some of them have been publicly deprived for not praying for their majesties in the terms of the act of parliament have publicly preached and exercised the ministerial function within their own houses and parishes where the same lie and elsewhere without qualifying themselves according to law by swearing and signing the oath of allegiance and engaging not to own the late King James and have not prayed for their majesties in such specific terms as their hearers might have known that they prayed for their majesties King William and Queen Mary as king and queen and have been so far from evidencing the sense they ought to have had of their majesties’ preservation and relief of the grievous circumstances the nation then lay under that when the proclamation of the estates went to them, at least came to their hands or of which they had knowledge, they were so far from testifying their gratitude in giving due obedience thereto that neither the day appointed nor at any time since did they read any of the said proclamations for thanksgiving or fast, albeit all these were delivered to their hands, but on the contrary, in contempt of these proclamations they actually preached daily since then without praying for their majesties as king and queen of this realm, convocating several parishes, stirring up and fomenting their disaffection to the government, encouraging our enemies and discouraging of our loyal subjects, sometimes not only praying for the late King James and that God would restore him and make his crown flourish upon his head but also at other times to pray in such ambiguous terms that their hearers could not understand that they prayed for their majesties, of all which crimes the foresaid persons are guilty actors, art and part, and ought and should be severely punished in their persons and goods to the terror of others to do the same in future; and concerning the charge given to all the forenamed persons above complained upon to have appeared before the said lords of privy council at a certain day bygone to have answered to the grounds of the above written complaint and to have heard and seen such order and course taken as the said lords should find just under the pain of rebellion and putting of them to the horn, with certification to them if they fail they should be denounced rebels and put to the horn and their majesties’ other letters should be directed against them for that effect, as the said libel and executions thereof bear. Which being called in presence of the said lords of their majesties privy council on 17 January instant and Sir James Stewart their majesties’ advocate appearing personally for their highnesses’ interest and all the defenders (except the said Mr George Wilson, former minister at Westruther), appearing also personally, the said lords granted certification against the said Mr George Wilson for his absence and non-appearance and ordered letters to be directed to messengers at arms to pass to the mercat cross of […] and other necessary places and there in their majesties’ names and authority, duly, lawfully and orderly denounce the said Mr George Wilson as their majesties’ rebel and put him to their highnesses’ horn, and order all his moveable goods and gear to be escheat and brought in to their majesties’ use for his contempt and disobedience; and the rest of the defenders being examined upon the points of the libel, declared according to their declarations extant in process. The said lords of privy council superseded the advising of this process of pronouncing any sentence therein until their next council day, the said lords of their majesties’ privy council having this day considered the foresaid libel with the declarations of the defenders appearing as said is, they find by the declaration of Mr Robert Bowmaker, minister at Abbey St Bathans that he has prayed for their majesties King William and Queen Mary by name and that he has kept the fasts and thanksgivings and therefore absolves him, and finds by the declaration of Mr James Lawtie, former minister at Chirnside, Mr Alexander Douglas, former minister at Coldingham, and Mr Thomas Blair, former minister at Lennall that they have preached since they were deprived but they find that they have not prayed for their majesties King William and Queen Mary and therefore discharges them to preach or exercise any part of the ministerial function either in churches, meetinghouses or any other places whatsoever until they qualify themselves in the terms of the act of parliament, with certification that if they fail in giving punctual obedience hereto, the pains and punishments contained in the acts of parliament shall be inflicted against them without favour or further delay, and the said lords declare that by the incurring the certification in the act of parliament (which is to be proceeded against as persons disaffected and enemies to their majesties’ government), the said ministers will be liable to fines, imprisonment or banishment; and as to Mr Adam Waddell, minister at Whitsome, they supersede to give sentence against him until he gives in to the council in writing under his hand the terms in which he prays for the king and queen whereby his hearers understand he means King William and Queen Mary, and similarly how Long he has prayed in those terms, and they appoint intimation to be made to him to give in the said writing the next council day.

1. PC1/48, 558-61.

2. The phrase ‘petition Given in to’ scored out here.

3. The ‘e’ written over a mistaken ‘s’.

1. PC1/48, 558-61.

Procedure, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the nynteinth day of Januarij Jaj vjc nyntie three years

A1693/1/351

Procedure

Duke of Hamilton receaved a Councillor

The Duke of Hamiltoune who is nominate one of there Majesties privie Councill by the Comissione of Councill daitted the third day of March Last being present did swear and Signe the oath of alleadgeance And signe the asureance And the Lord Chancellour haveing administered to him the oath de fideli His Grace wes receaved a privie Councillour.

At Edinburgh, 19 January 1693

A1693/1/351

Procedure

The duke of Hamilton received as a councillor

The duke of Hamilton, who is nominated as one of their majesties’ privy council by the commission of council dated 3 March last, being present swore and signed the oath of allegiance, and signed the assurance, and the lord chancellor having administered to him the oath de fideli, his grace was received as a privy councillor.

1. PC1/48, 558.

1. PC1/48, 558.

Sederunt, 19 January 1693, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the nynteinth day of Januarij Jaj vjc nyntie three years1

A1693/1/342

Sederunt

Lord Chancellour; Duke of Hamiltoun; Earl of Melvill Lord privy seall; Marquis of Douglas; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Breadalbaine; Viscount Tarbatt; Lord Raith; Lord Cardross; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Carmichaell; Master of Forbes; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Fountainhall; Lord Hattoun; Lord Enstruther; Laird of Grant; Laird of Blackbarrony; Laird of Stevinstoun; Sir William Lockhart; Sir Patrick Murray

At Edinburgh, 19 January 16931

A1693/1/342

Sederunt

[John Hay, earl of Tweeddale], lord chancellor; [James Hamilton], duke of Hamilton; [George Melville], earl of Melville, Lord privy seal; [James Douglas], marquis of Douglas; [George Livingstone], earl of Linlithgow; [Robert Kerr], earl of Lothian; [David Leslie], earl of Leven; [Archibald Douglas], earl of Forfar; [John Campbell], earl of Breadalbane; [George MacKenzie], Viscount Tarbat; [Alexander Melville], Lord Raith; [Henry Erskine], Lord Cardross; [John Hamilton], Lord Belhaven; [John], Lord Carmichael; [William], master of Forbes; [Sir James Stewart of Goodtrees], lord advocate; [Sir Adam Cockburn of Ormiston], lord justice clerk; [Sir John Lauder], Lord Fountainhall; [Sir John Lauder], Lord Hattoun; [Sir William Anstruther], Lord Anstruther; [Ludovic Grant], laird of Grant; [Sir Archibald Murray], laird of Blackbarony; [Sir Robert Sinclair], laird of Stevenson; Sir William Lockhart; Sir Patrick Murray.

1. PC1/48, 558.

2. PC1/48, 558.

1. PC1/48, 558.

2. PC1/48, 558.