Procedure: remission, 20 May 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Twentie day of May Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/5/181

Procedure: remission

[Letters from Commissioners of Supply remitted to committee]

The Councill Remitts the two letters direct to the Lord Chancelor one from the Commissioners of Supplie of the Shyre of Renfrew and the other from the magistrats of Jedburgh to the Comittie appoynted to consider the Reports from the westerne shyres.

Edinburgh the Twentie day of May Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/5/181

Procedure: remission

[Letters from Commissioners of Supply remitted to committee]

The Councill Remitts the two letters direct to the Lord Chancelor one from the Commissioners of Supplie of the Shyre of Renfrew and the other from the magistrats of Jedburgh to the Comittie appoynted to consider the Reports from the westerne shyres.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 55r.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 55r.

Procedure, 20 May 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Twentie day of May Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/5/171

Procedure

[Lord Polwarth granted leave of absence]

The Councill Grants leave to the Lord Polwarth to goe to the Countrie for his Majesties service.

Edinburgh the Twentie day of May Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/5/171

Procedure

[Lord Polwarth granted leave of absence]

The Councill Grants leave to the Lord Polwarth to goe to the Countrie for his Majesties service.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 54v.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 54v.

Act, 20 May 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Twentie day of May Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/5/161

Act

Act James Dykes Cordinar

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councill be James Dykes Shoemaker in the Cannogate and present kirk thesaurer to the session of Hollyruidhouse Shewing That quher the kirk session of Hollyruidhouse ever since the happy Reformatione from Popery has been a legall constitute session without Respect to any change or alteratione in the Church government Continued in the annuall electione of their successors and of a kirk thesaurer who was allwayes intrusted by them with what concerned the intrest of the Church and particularly in haveing the charge and oversight of the manse and such parts therof as were sett out for the use of the minister of the Cannogate The said kirk sessione haveing been allwayes at the expences and charge of Repairing the said manse (alse often as occasione called for the samen) And a part of the said manse haveing been sett by the petitioners predecessors as kirk thesaurer to the ends forsaids, And Mrs Stirling widow haveing been the last tennent in a part of the said Manse and have removed at the terme of Whitsunday last she did deliver the keyes therof to the petitioner And in receiveing wherof, albeit the Supplicant acted in that Station as kirk thesaurer and as his predecessors past all memory had done, yet Patrick Hallyburtone principall Barron baillie of the Canogate Haveing wpon Frayday the nyntein instant about nyne acloak at night sumarly Commanded the petitioner without furder to deliver up the keyes of the said house, The Supplicant made no other returne, That it might be delayed to the nixt day, That he accquanted the rest of the members of the sessione Notwithstanding quherof without any other offence, or provocation quhatsomever The said Patrick Hallyburtone most sumarly at his oun hand caused incarcerat the petitioner in the Tolbooth of the Cannogate wher he sill remaines prisoner, and as it is not usuall for any magistrat upon pretence of a Ryot to incarcerat any persone after sum sett that belonging properly to the constable of the quarter So heir uith all submission their was no Just ground for the baillie to have done the same seing the supplicant acted nothing in the affair bot quhat was Consequentiall to that trust reposed upon him by the remanent members of the sessione without desyring in the least to offend authoritie or to offer any thing that might seem Injurious to one that caried the Character of a Magistrat By doeing quherof it was humbly conceaved the said Patrick Hallyburtone has exceided the legall and Just bounds of that authoritie that is lodged in his person and is guilty of the wrongeous Imprisonment of the petitioners persone, Who is their majesties free leidge and who acted nothing that could give the baillie ane Just provocation to doe the samen And Therfor Humbly Craveing the saids Lords to take the premisses to their consideration and upon the grounds above represented, not only to ordaine the supplicant sumarly to be sett at libertie as being Injuriously Imprisoned Bot would Lykwayes Grant warrand to cite the said Patrick before them upon the forsaid account and to prevent such abuses for the futur would Discharge the magistrats of the Cannogat from such sumar and illegall procedur in tyme comeing and if ther ware any thing as to the point of Right that in the least might be pretended by the magistrats that this might be received to be determined by the Judge ordinar as accords of Law, as the petitione bears The Lords of their majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this petition given in to them be the above James Dykes They heirby Ordaine the Magistrats of Edinburgh Baillies of the Cannogate and keeper of their Tolbooth to sett the said James at Libertie And Ordaines him to exhibit and deliver the keyes of the above manss to the Lord Provost of Edinburgh to Remaine in his hands untill the matter be legally determined.

Edinburgh the Twentie day of May Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/5/161

Act

Act James Dykes Cordinar

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councill be James Dykes Shoemaker in the Cannogate and present kirk thesaurer to the session of Hollyruidhouse Shewing That quher the kirk session of Hollyruidhouse ever since the happy Reformatione from Popery has been a legall constitute session without Respect to any change or alteratione in the Church government Continued in the annuall electione of their successors and of a kirk thesaurer who was allwayes intrusted by them with what concerned the intrest of the Church and particularly in haveing the charge and oversight of the manse and such parts therof as were sett out for the use of the minister of the Cannogate The said kirk sessione haveing been allwayes at the expences and charge of Repairing the said manse (alse often as occasione called for the samen) And a part of the said manse haveing been sett by the petitioners predecessors as kirk thesaurer to the ends forsaids, And Mrs Stirling widow haveing been the last tennent in a part of the said Manse and have removed at the terme of Whitsunday last she did deliver the keyes therof to the petitioner And in receiveing wherof, albeit the Supplicant acted in that Station as kirk thesaurer and as his predecessors past all memory had done, yet Patrick Hallyburtone principall Barron baillie of the Canogate Haveing wpon Frayday the nyntein instant about nyne acloak at night sumarly Commanded the petitioner without furder to deliver up the keyes of the said house, The Supplicant made no other returne, That it might be delayed to the nixt day, That he accquanted the rest of the members of the sessione Notwithstanding quherof without any other offence, or provocation quhatsomever The said Patrick Hallyburtone most sumarly at his oun hand caused incarcerat the petitioner in the Tolbooth of the Cannogate wher he sill remaines prisoner, and as it is not usuall for any magistrat upon pretence of a Ryot to incarcerat any persone after sum sett that belonging properly to the constable of the quarter So heir uith all submission their was no Just ground for the baillie to have done the same seing the supplicant acted nothing in the affair bot quhat was Consequentiall to that trust reposed upon him by the remanent members of the sessione without desyring in the least to offend authoritie or to offer any thing that might seem Injurious to one that caried the Character of a Magistrat By doeing quherof it was humbly conceaved the said Patrick Hallyburtone has exceided the legall and Just bounds of that authoritie that is lodged in his person and is guilty of the wrongeous Imprisonment of the petitioners persone, Who is their majesties free leidge and who acted nothing that could give the baillie ane Just provocation to doe the samen And Therfor Humbly Craveing the saids Lords to take the premisses to their consideration and upon the grounds above represented, not only to ordaine the supplicant sumarly to be sett at libertie as being Injuriously Imprisoned Bot would Lykwayes Grant warrand to cite the said Patrick before them upon the forsaid account and to prevent such abuses for the futur would Discharge the magistrats of the Cannogat from such sumar and illegall procedur in tyme comeing and if ther ware any thing as to the point of Right that in the least might be pretended by the magistrats that this might be received to be determined by the Judge ordinar as accords of Law, as the petitione bears The Lords of their majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this petition given in to them be the above James Dykes They heirby Ordaine the Magistrats of Edinburgh Baillies of the Cannogate and keeper of their Tolbooth to sett the said James at Libertie And Ordaines him to exhibit and deliver the keyes of the above manss to the Lord Provost of Edinburgh to Remaine in his hands untill the matter be legally determined.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 54r-54v.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 54r-54v.

Sederunt, 20 May 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the Twentie day of May Jaj vjc nyntie two years1

D1692/5/152

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor: Earl of Drumlanrig; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Brodalbine; Viscount Tarbet; Viscount Stair; Lord Raith; Lord Cardross; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Polwarth; Lord Hatton; Lord Fountonhall; Lord Enstruther; Laird of Blackbarony; Sir Thomas Livingston; Sir William Lockhart; Sir Patrick Murray

Edinburgh the Twentie day of May Jaj vjc nyntie two years1

D1692/5/152

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor: Earl of Drumlanrig; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Brodalbine; Viscount Tarbet; Viscount Stair; Lord Raith; Lord Cardross; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Polwarth; Lord Hatton; Lord Fountonhall; Lord Enstruther; Laird of Blackbarony; Sir Thomas Livingston; Sir William Lockhart; Sir Patrick Murray

1. NRS, PC2/24, 53v.

2. NRS, PC2/24, 53v.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 53v.

2. NRS, PC2/24, 53v.

Act, 21 May 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie First day of Maij Jaj vjc and nyntie tuo years

A1692/5/1501

Act

Act for the Earle of Seaforths Liberty

Anent the petition Given in to the Lords of there Majesties privie Councill be Kenneth Lord Seaforth Shewing That where the petitioner haveing been for some Considerable tyme pypast prisoner in the Castle of Edinburgh And now by the space of Fourteen moneths or thereby since his Liberation haveing been under Confynement within the toun of Edinburgh and suburbs thereof wherethrow and by the petitioners Long absence from his private effairs at home, His interest in the Countrie to his great prejudice he suffered extreamly And will Ineviteablie herm the petitioners Longer absence suffer dayly more and more For preventing whereof and for a present relaxation for some tyme from his present Confynement The petitioner in this exigence Is necessitate for this effect To Make this address to there Lordships Humbly Craveing that the saids Lords with regaird to the petitioners present Circumstances will be pleased to allow the petitioner the freedome for such a Competent tyme as yow shall think fitt, To retire home in this proper seasone of the year for setleing his private effairs there sieing he is willing to renew his former baill under the same penalty and Certificatione not only to returne at such tyme as the saids Lords of privie Councill shall appoint Bot Lykewayes to Live peaceably and quyetly and without any disturbance to the present government in the mean tyme As the said petitione bears The Saids Lords of there Majestyes privie Councill Haveing Considered this petition given in to them be the above Kenneth Earle of Sieforth They hereby allow the petitioner to repair to his oune2 home at any tyme after elapsing of the […] day of Junij next to come about his private affairs The petitioner alwayes befor extracting hereof Finding sufficient Cautione acted in the books of privie Councill that he shall Live peaceably under and with all submission to the government of there majestyes King William and Queen Mary And that he shall not act consult or contryve any thing in prejudice thereof And that he shall not Converse Nor Correspond with any rebells And that he shall appear befor the saids Lords of privie Councill when called under the penalty of Tuo Thousand pound sterling Contained in his former bond In case he shall transgress in any pairt of the premises.

At Edinburgh 21 May 1692

A1692/5/1501

Act

Act for the earl of Seaforth’s liberty

Regarding the petition given in to the lords of their majesties’ privy council by Kenneth [MacKenzie], Lord Seaforth, showing that where the petitioner having been for some considerable time a prisoner in the Castle of Edinburgh and now by the space of 14 months or thereby since his liberation having been under confinement within the town of Edinburgh and suburbs thereof wherethrough and by the petitioner’s long absence from his private affairs at home, his interest in the country to his great prejudice he suffered extremely and will inevitably harm the petitioner’s longer absence suffer daily more and more. For preventing whereof and for a present relaxation for some time from his present confinement, the petitioner in this exigency is compelled to make this address to their lordships, humbly craving that the said lords, with regard to the petitioner’s present circumstances, will be pleased to allow the petitioner the freedom for such a competent time as you shall think fit, to retire home in this proper season of the year for settling his private affairs, seeing he is willing to renew his former bail under the same penalty and certification not only to return at such a time as the said lords of privy council shall appoint, but likewise to live peacefully and quietly and without any disturbance to the present government in the meantime, as the said petition bears. The said lords of their majesties’ privy council having considered this petition given in to them by the above Kenneth, earl of Seaforth, they hereby allow the petitioner to return to his own home at any time after elapsing of the […] day of June next to come about his private affairs, the petitioner, before the extracting hereof, finding sufficient caution acted in the books of privy council that he shall live peacefully under and with all submission to the government of their majesties King William and Queen Mary, and that he shall not act, consult or contrive anything in prejudice thereof, and that he shall not converse or correspond with any rebels, and that he shall appear before the said lords of privy council when called, under the penalty of £2,000 sterling contained in his former bond in case he shall transgress in any part of the premises.

1. PC1/48, 220.

2. The word ‘house’ scored out here.

1. PC1/48, 220.

Order, 21 May 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie First day of Maij Jaj vjc and nyntie tuo years

A1692/5/1491

Order

Recomendation to the theasury for provyding the Kingdome with armes and amunition

The Lords of there Majestyes privie Councill Considering that this Kingdome in the present exigencie doeth and hereafter may stand in nead of amunitione and armes of severall sorts doe therefore recomend to the Lords Commissioners of there majestyes theasurie To Call for such merchands as aither voluntarly offer or are content to engadge to transport armes and amunition into this Kingdome as there Lordships shall think fitt The merchands alwayes Engadgeing that the same shall not be disposed of, but for the service of there majestyes and the Natione by order of the Lords of Councill or theasury And Recomends to the Lord High Chancellor or the saids Lords Commissioners to wreitt to the Queens majesty and the secretary of state That some armes and amunition may be transported from England out of the magazines there into this Kingdome for the present Exigence untill sufficient quantityes may be hade from other places abroad And Further recomends to the saids Lords Commissioners to Consider the proposeall made to there Lords of the theasury by Captain Sletzer Captain of the Artilery Company anent the dressing and makeing fitt for service the old armes presently within this Kingdome and the makeing of new ones and to give orders to the said Captain with all speed to dress and putt in case the old armes and to make such quantityes of new ones as there Lordships from tyme to tyme shall find there majestyes service and the Conditione of the natione to stand in nead off

At Edinburgh 21 May 1692

A1692/5/1491

Order

Recommendation to the treasury for providing the kingdom with arms and ammunition

The lords of their majesties’ privy council considering that this kingdom in the present exigency does and hereafter may stand in need of ammunition and arms of several sorts, therefore recommend to the lords commissioners of their majesties’ treasury to call for such merchants as either voluntarily offer or are content to engage to transport arms and ammunition into this kingdom as their lordships shall think fit, the merchants always engaging that the same shall not be disposed of but for the service of their majesties and the nation by order of the lords of council or treasury; and they recommend to the lord high chancellor or the said lords commissioners to write to the queen’s majesty and the secretary of state that some arms and ammunition may be transported from England out of the magazines there into this kingdom for the present exigency until sufficient quantities may be had from other places abroad; and further they recommend to the said lords commissioners to consider the proposal made to the lords of treasury by Captain Slezer, captain of the artillery company, concerning dressing and making fit for service the old arms presently within this kingdom and the making new ones, and to give orders to the said captain with all speed to dress and put in good condition the old arms and to make such quantities of new ones as their lordships from time to time shall find their majesties’ service and the condition of the nation to need.

1. PC1/48, 219.

1. PC1/48, 219.

Letter: royal, 21 May 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie First day of Maij Jaj vjc and nyntie tuo years

A1692/5/1481

Letter: royal

Letter from the Counsell To The Queens majestie

A Letter from the Councill to the2 Queens majestie Giveing accompt of the Councills care for the security of this natione and putting the same in a posture of defence againest any Invasione or Insurrectione And of severall addresses from shyres and burghes to there majestyes read votted and approven and recomended to the Lord High Chancellour to transmitt the same by a fleeing pacquett to the secretarie of state with the originall Addresses and printed Coppies of proclamations Mentioned in the said Letter to be by the secretary Communicated to her Royall Majestie at her majestyes Conveniencie off the which Letter the tenor followes May it please your Majesty Upon the apprehensiones of ane Invasione signifyed to us at your majestyes Comand by mr Johnstoun secretarie of state wee have mett frequently and almost everie day and called together the wholl standing forces within this Kingdome (Except Colonell Hills regiment at Fort William out of which detachments are made to Innerness and all the other Castles and houses which are garisoned for keeping the Highlands in quyet) and brought them about Edinburgh, Intending next week to Encamp them not farr from thence, Wee are also putting the Kingdome in the best posture of defence we can as is more fully exprest in tuo proclamationes sent to the secretary And being Informed that severall preachers in meeting houses did not pray for the King and your majestie wee have Issued a proclamation sent to the secretarie Commanding the magistrats to make tryall thereof and have banished severalls of them out of the Citie of Edinburgh who would not give assureance to pray for the future wee have used all diligence possible to find out any designe, ill affected people might have hade for disturbing the peace and quyett of the Kingdome And finding that a Considerable Number of horses hade been bought up and brought in from England and upon seasing of some suspected persones not being able to make any great discovery wee have been necessitate to secure the horses and armes of papists and of such as were under baill for there appearance, in severall shyres and have ordered it to be done in more And have caused charge themselves and there baills to appear befor the Councill according as they are bound by there bonds Upon ane order from the King wee did seize my Lord Sieforth who haveing Escaped that very night from the guard out of his Lodgings we have retaken him and he is now in the castle of Edinburgh Closs prisoner, wee ordered the Earle of Pearth to reenter the Castle of Stirling and accordingly he is entered And have transmitted Naval Pain to the Castle of Blackness where he is to be Closs prisoner for some tyme. There hes been severall addresses to the King and your majesties presented to us from your Cities of Edinburgh and Glasgow and the toun of Paislay And from the shyres of Lanerk and Renfrew which we have transmitted to the secretary to be showen your majesty This being a full accompt of our actings wee hope it may be acceptable to your majestie with our sincere and heartie offers of our outmost endeavours upon this and all other occasions to serve the King and your majesty faithfully as is the duety of. Your majesties most humble most faithfull and most obedient subjects and servants sic subscribitur Tweeddale Cancel: Queensberrie Douglas Drumlanrig Linlithgow Lothian Forfar Breadalban Tarbatt Stair Beilhaven Archibald Murray Thomas Livingston William Lockhart Patrick Murrray

At Edinburgh 21 May 1692

A1692/5/1481

Letter: royal

Letter from the council to the queen’s majesty

A letter from the council to the queen’s majesty giving account of the council’s care for the security of this nation and putting the same in a posture of defence against any invasion or insurrection, and of several addresses from shires and burghs to their majesties, was read, voted and approved and recommended to the lord high chancellor to transmit the same by a flying packet to the secretary of state with the original addresses and printed copies of proclamations mentioned in the said letter to be communicated by the secretary to her royal majesty at her majesty’s convenience, of which letter the tenor follows: May it please your majesty, upon the apprehension of an invasion signified to us at your majesty’s command by Mr [James] Johnston, secretary of state, we have met frequently and almost every day and called together the whole standing forces within this kingdom (except Colonel Hill’s regiment at Fort William out of which detachments are made to Inverness and all the other castles and houses which are garrisoned for keeping the Highlands quiet) and brought them about Edinburgh, intending next week to encamp them not far from there; we are also putting the kingdom in the best posture of defence we can as is more fully expressed in two proclamations sent to the secretary, and being Informed that several preachers in meeting houses did not pray for the king and your majesty, we have issued a proclamation sent to the secretary commanding the magistrates to investigate and have banished several of them out of the city of Edinburgh who would not give assurance to pray for the future; we have used all diligence possible to find out any design ill-affected people might have had for disturbing the peace and quiet of the kingdom, and finding that a considerable number of horses had been bought up and brought in from England and upon seizing some suspected persons and not being able to make any great discovery, we have been necessitated to secure the horses and arms of Catholics and of such as were under bail for their appearance in several shires, and have ordered it to be done in more, and have charged them and their bails to appear before the council as they are bound by their bonds; upon an order from the king we did seize [Kenneth MacKenzie], Lord Seaforth who having escaped that very night from the guard out of his lodgings we have retaken and he is now in the Castle of Edinburgh a close prisoner; we ordered [James Drummond], earl of Perth to re-enter the Castle of Stirling and accordingly he has, and have transmitted Henry Neville Payne to the Castle of Blackness where he is to be a close prisoner for some time. There have been several addresses to the king and your majesties presented to us from your cities of Edinburgh and Glasgow and the town of Paisley and from the shires of Lanark and Renfrew which we have transmitted to the secretary to be shown to you. This being a full account of our actions we hope it may be acceptable to your majesty with our sincere and hearty offers of our utmost endeavour upon this and all other occasions to serve the king and your majesty faithfully as is the duty of your majesty’s most humble, most faithful and most obedient subjects and servants. Subscribed: Tweeddale Chancellor; Queensberry; Douglas; Drumlanrig; Linlithgow; Lothian; Forfar; Breadalbane; Tarbat; Stair; Belhaven; Archibald Murray; Thomas Livingston; William Lockhart; Patrick Murrray.

1. PC1/48, 218-19.

2. The words ‘Councill to the’ inserted above the line.

1. PC1/48, 218-19.

Decreet, 21 May 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie First day of Maij Jaj vjc and nyntie tuo years

A1692/5/1471

Decreet

Decreet There Majesties Sollicitor against Oliphant and Robertson

Anent the Lybell or Complaint Raised befor the Lords of there majesties privie Councill at the instance of Sir William Lockhart there majesties sollicitor for there highnes interest in the matter under wreitten mentioneing That where by the Canon Law and by the Lawes and acts of parliament of this and everie well governed natione, The ouneing acknowledging or wishing well to any other persone as King then he who is established by Law, and the forceing the Leedges to doe or quarrelling them for not doeing acts Contrarie to there Inclinations and the Lawes of the Land and the appealling and stirring up any persone to Combatt And the assaulting Invading beatting or wounding any of there majesties subjects Especially upon the high streets of Edinburgh And when the forsaid persones Comitters thereof are bound and under baill to the peace by obleidgement or promise to the saids Lords of Councill are Crymes of ane high Nature and most severely punisheable And particularly by ane act of the meeting of the Estates of this Kingdome daited the thretteint day of Apryll Jaj vjc and Eightie nyne All the Leedges are prohibited and discharged upon there highest perrill to oune or acknowledge the Late King James as there King And by ane act of the present Current parliament daitted the Seventeenth day of Junij Jaj vjc and Eightie Nyne Recognizeing there majesties authority Its declared high treasone in any of the subjects of this Kingdome by wreitting speaking or any other maner of way to quarrell or Impugne there majesties authority right and title to the Croun Yet nevertheless it is of verity that Doctor Charles Oliphant sone to Charles Oliphant of Langtoun and David Robertsone ventner in Edinburgh shakeing off all fear of God and the Just obedience and alleadgeance they owe to there majestyes, there government authority and Lawes Being upon the sixteent day of Maij Current or ane or other of the dayes of the said moneth Conveened with Mr Archibald Sinclair advocat, Mr Simeon Mckenzie nephew to the deceist Sir George Mckenzie of Rosehaugh Mr David Dickson doctor of Medicine and Robert Clerk Chirurgeon apothecary in Edinburgh in the house of the said David Robertson Mr Archibald Sinclair did drink the Kings health And when it came to be drunk by the said Doctor Charles Oliphant he did most unduetyfully and disloyally say That the Kings health might be Drunk in ane equivocall sense and accordingly he did drink it in that sense And the health comeing to Doctor Dickson, He said he would drink it in ane univocall sense and thereupon named the health of King William, upon which the said Doctor Oliphant rose up, and fell into ane extraordinarie fitt of passione And swore By God he would not drink it, And called Doctor Dickson Impertinent for particularizing such a health And thereupon did utter thir words That it wes ane affront to him and severall other words and expressiones which did Import ane appeall and signifyed ane designed revenge upon which the Company did interpose and they being upon there feet made them sitt doun And Imediatly thereafter the said David Robertson did take up the glass And to shew his disaffection to there saids majestyes and there government and contrary to the due alleadgeance he owes to the same did drink King James’s health and said when the Kings health wes by him drunk in his house he alwayes meaned King James To which Doctor Oliphant said It was King James his health And he would see it goe round And thereupon Doctor Dicksone haveing taken the Company witnes of such ane Insolent Contempt of there majesties Lawes and government Left them And albeit upon dilatione of the matter to the Lords of privie Councill And in order to secure the persones Charles Oliphant father to the said Doctor Oliphant did promise and obleidge himself to present his sone And that in the mean tyme he should keep the peace Yet to show the rancor and malice of his heart againest the said Doctor Dicksone for drinking there majesties healths upon the day thereafter being the seventeint of maij betuixt Eight and Nyne acloack at night he did in a furious maner Come out of a Coatch and assualt and rune upon the said Doctor Dicksone and beatt him upon the Face, and turne about his nose and Call him villaine and rascall In manifest contempt of there majestyes there authority and Lawes Whereby the said Doctor Charles Oliphant and David Robertsone are guilty of most treasonable and seditious practices and ane high and manifest ryott and breach of the peace and Lawes of the Kingdome and aught and should be exemplarly punished in there persones and goods to the terror of others to Committ the Lyke in tyme comeing And Anent the Charge Given to the saids Doctor Charles Oliphant and David Robertson To have Compeared befor the saids Lords of there majesties privie Councill To ansuer to the points of the above Lybell upon the tuentyeth day of maij Instant and to hear and see such order and course taken there anent as appertaines under the pain of rebellione and putting of them to the horne With Certificatione to them If they failzied There majestyes other Letters would be direct simpliciter for putting them thereto As the said Lybell and executiones thereof bears. Which Being Called In presence of the saids Lords of privie Councill upon the said tuentieth day of maij Instant And there majesties sollicitor being present with Mr Hugh Dalrymple advocat as persuer and the defenders personallie present being brought from prisone to the barr The saids Lords of there majesties privie Councill Finds the Lybell relevant and admitts the same to probatione And the witnesses being called and Compearing and Except Mr Simon Mckenzie and Captain […] Muir Granted farder diligence againest the said tuo absent witnesses And the witnesses present haveing made faith except Doctor Dicksone Remitted to the Lords Fountainhall and Enstruther to examine all the witnesses Except the said Doctor. And the saids Lords of privie Councill haveing this day Considered the above Lybell with the depositiones of the witnesses adduced for proveing thereof They Find him In the soume of Ane Hundreth pounds sterling and ordaines him to pay the same to Sir Patrick Murray Collector of there majesties Croun rents And appoints him to be detained prisoner in the tolbooth of Edinburgh till the same be payed And Lykewayes Finds the Lybell proven againest the said David Robertsone And therefore Fynes him in the soume of Fiftie pounds sterling and ordaines him to make payment thereof to the said Sir Patrick Murray And appoints him to remaine prisoner in the tolbooth of Edinburgh untill he make payment of the same And for such tyme therefter as the saids Lords Lords2 shall think fitt And ordaines both the saids defenders instantly to find sufficient Cautione acted in the books of privie Councill That they shall keep the peace And on nowayes disturb the same And particularly that Doctor David Dicksone his wyfe bairnes tennents and servants shall be harmeles and skaithles of the saids defenders there wyves bairnes tennents and servants And on nowayes troubled or molested by them or there forsaids Nor by none others of there Causing sending out Comand resett assistance or ratihabitione whom they may stopt or Lett directly or Indirectly under the penalty of Tuo Hundreth pound sterling a piece And the saids Lords gives order and warrand to the Clerks of privie Councill In whose hands the keyes of the said David Robertsone his Cellars and Severall roumes of his duelling house or Inn’s which were seized by order of Councill, are now Lyeing To redelyver and give back the saids keyes And ordaines Letters of horning on six dayes and others nead full to pass hereon as effeirs

At Edinburgh 21 May 1692

A1692/5/1471

Decreet

Decreet: their majesties’ solicitor against Oliphant and Robertson

Regarding the libel or complaint raised before the lords of their majesties’ privy council at the instance of Sir William Lockhart, their majesties’ solicitor, for their highnesses’ interest in the matter underwritten, mentioning that where by canon law and by the laws and acts of parliament of this and every well-governed nation, the owning, acknowledging or wishing well to any other person as king than he who is established by law, and forcing the lieges to do or challenging them for not doing acts contrary to their inclinations and the lawes of the land and the appealing and stirring up any person to combat and the assaulting, invading, beating or wounding any of their majesties’ subjects, especially upon the high streets of Edinburgh, and when the foresaid persons committers thereof are bound and under bail for the peace by obligation or promise to the said lords of council are crimes of a high nature and most severely punishable, and particularly by an act of the meeting of the estates of this kingdom dated 13 April 1689, all the lieges are prohibited and forbidden upon their highest peril to own or acknowledge the late King James as their king, and by an act of the present current parliament dated 17 June 1689 recognising their majesties’ authority, it is declared high treason in any of the subjects of this kingdom by writing, speaking or any other manner of way to challenge or impugn their majesties’ authority, right and title to the crown. Yet nevertheless it is of verity that Doctor Charles Oliphant, son of Charles Oliphant of Langton, and David Robertson, vintner in Edinburgh, shaking off all fear of God and the just obedience and allegiance they owe to their majesties, their government, authority and laws, being upon 16 May current, or one or other of the days of the said month, convened with Mr Archibald Sinclair, advocate, Mr Simeon MacKenzie, nephew to the deceased Sir George MacKenzie of Rosehaugh, Mr David Dickson, doctor of medicine, and Robert Clerk, surgeon apothecary in Edinburgh, in the house of the said David Robertson, Mr Archibald Sinclair drank the king’s health and when it came to be drunk by the said Doctor Charles Oliphant, he did most undutifully and disloyally say that the king’s health might be drunk in an equivocal sense and accordingly he drank it in that sense, and the health coming to Doctor Dickson, he said he would drink it in a univocal sense and thereupon named the health of King William, upon which the said Doctor Oliphant rose up, and fell into an extraordinary fit of passion and swore by God he would not drink it, and called Doctor Dickson impertinent for particularising such a health, and thereupon uttered such words that it was an affront to him and several other words and expressions which imported an appeal and signified a designed revenge upon which the company did interpose, and they being upon their feet made them sit down, and immediately thereafter the said David Robertson took up the glass and to show his disaffection to their said majesties and their government and contrary to the due allegiance he owes to the same, did drink King James’s health and said when the king’s health was drunk by him in his house he always meant King James, to which Doctor Oliphant said it was King James’s health and he would see it go round, and thereupon Doctor Dickson having taken the company witness of such an insolent contempt of their majesties’ laws and government, left them and albeit upon accusation of the matter to the lords of privy council and in order to secure the persons, Charles Oliphant, father to the said Doctor Oliphant, promised and obliged himself to present his son, and that in the meantime he should keep the peace, yet to show the rancour and malice of his heart against the said Doctor Dickson for drinking their majesties’ health, upon the day thereafter being 17 of May between 8 and 9 o’clock at night he did in a furious manner come out of a coach and assault and run upon the said Doctor Dickson and beat him upon the face, and turn about his nose and call him villain and rascal in manifest contempt of their majesties, their authority and laws, whereby the said Doctor Charles Oliphant and David Robertson are guilty of most treasonable and seditious practices and a high and manifest riot and breach of the peace and laws of the kingdom and ought and should be exemplarily punished in their persons and goods to the terror of others to commit the same in future, and concerning the charge given to the said Doctor Charles Oliphant and David Robertson to have appeared before the said lords of their majesties’ privy council to answer to the points of the above libel on 20 May instant and to hear and see such order and course taken as appertains under the pain of rebellion and putting of them to the horn with certification to them that if they failed their majesties’ other letters would be directed summarily for putting them thereto, as the said libel and executions thereof bear. Which being called in presence of the said lords of privy council on the said 20 May instant, and their majesties’ solicitor being present with Mr Hugh Dalrymple advocate as pursuer, and the defenders personally present being brought from prison to the bar, the said lords of their majesties’ privy council find the libel relevant and admit the same to probation, and the witnesses being called and appearing and except Mr Simon MacKenzie and Captain […] Muir granted further diligence against the said two absent witnesses, and the witnesses present having made faith except Doctor Dickson, it was remitted to the Lords Fountainhall and Anstruther to examine all the witnesses except the said Doctor. And the said lords of privy council having this day considered the above libel with the depositions of the witnesses adduced for proving thereof, they fine him in the sum £100 sterling and ordain him to pay the same to Sir Patrick Murray, collector of their majesties’ crown rents, and appoint him to be detained prisoner in the tolbooth of Edinburgh till the same be paid, and similarly they find the libel proved against the said David Robertson and therefore fine him in the sum of £50 sterling and ordain him to make payment thereof to the said Sir Patrick Murray, and appoint him to remain a prisoner in the tolbooth of Edinburgh until he makes payment of the same and for such time thereafter as the said lords shall think fit, and they ordain both the said defenders instantly to find sufficient caution acted in the books of privy council that they shall keep the peace and in no way disturb the same, and particularly that Doctor David Dickson, his wife, children, tenants and servants shall not be harmed or injured by the said defenders’ wives, children, tenants and servants, and in no way troubled or molested by them, nor by any others of their causing, sending out, command, reset, assistance or approval whom they may stop or let directly or indirectly under the penalty of £200 sterling each, and the said lords give order and warrant to the clerks of privy council in whose hands the keys of the said David Robertson’s cellars and several rooms of his dwelling house or inn which were seized by order of council are now lying, to redeliver and give back the said keys, and they ordain letters of horning on six days’ notice and other necessary things to pass hereon as required.

1. PC1/48, 215-18.

2. Sic.

1. PC1/48, 215-18.

Act, 21 May 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie First day of Maij Jaj vjc and nyntie tuo years

A1692/5/1461

Act

Act The Toun of Glasgow for Levyeing of ane regiment of men

Anent the petitione Given in to the Lords of there Majestyes privie Councill be the magistrats and Councill of the Citie of Glasgow for themselves and there Inhabitants Shewing That where by ane former address to the King and Queens majesties presented to the Councill The petitioners freely offered there Lyves and fortunes for there majesties service againest the threattened Invasione In order whereunto They have Not only drawen furth and mustered there fencible men Bot have also resolved to make up a regiment of foot whom they will mantaine and pay weekly dureing the apprehensiones of this Invasione That they may be in readines to march as the Councill shall please to order them and that without prejudice to the bringing furth of the rest of the fencible men In case of Imminent danger For the better performance whereof The petitioners humbly represent to, and demand of the Councill First That they may have there allowance for the raising and modelling of the said regiment with the assistance of one of the tuo Independent Companyes ordered for Clidsdaill as Sir Thomas Livingstoun Comander in cheif of there majestyes forces within this Kingdome shall appoint And that for the raising of the said regiment The petitioners may have Joyned to there Citie for this tyme only the tuo paroches of the barrony of Glasgow and Govan that Include there suburbs And that with the consent of the shyre And Secondly that Conforme to the act of Conventione produced such of there resideing burgesses as are heretors of the shyre and muster and Joyne with the petitioners in the service may be excused from there personall attendance at the randezvouze of the shyre Thirdly That such heretors of the shyre as are resideing burgesses in that Citie and shall not take the Engadgement Conforme to the proclamation shall be obleidged to delyver up to them the horses with there furniture and armes In maner therein specified If the shyre shall omitt to take them from them And Fourthly That sieing upon the Late search which the petitioners made by the Councills warrand There wes not above Tuo Hundreth pound weight of pouder found in the place And that there may be also upon occasione some want of armes The Councill would be pleased to appoint a certain quantity of pouder to be Laid up with them in magazine To be made use of or restored again as the event may happen And lykewayes that the petitioners may have such allowance of armes as the Commandant shall find needfull upon security for restoreing the samen And therefor humbly Craveing that the saids Lords would be Graciously pleased to grant and accord to the petitioners the premisses As the said petitione bears Which being read in presence of the saids Lords of privie Councill They by there delyverance of the date the Tuentieth of Maij Instant doe remitt to a Comittee of there oune number to consider how the particulars Craved in the above petitione might be granted and to report to the Councill And the said Comittee haveing mett and made there report The saids Lords of there majesties privie Councill Doe hereby authorize the Citie of Glasgow to Levie ane regiment and arme the Six Hundreth Men, mentioned in there Instructiones from the proveist of Glasgow and to name there officers And grants warrand to the said Sir Thomas Livingstoun to send one of the Independent Companyes to Glasgow And the Lords doe hereby exeem these in the Citie who have Estates in the Countrey from randezvouzing with the heretors of the shyre And appoints the magistrates of Glasgow to offer them the Engadgement And if they accept it not the oath of alleadgeance and assureance in the same way as is appointed by the Late proclamatione for the shyre and in case of there refuseall to seize upon there horses and armes And allowes the tuo paroches viz the barrony of Glasgow and Govan to be Joyned to the Citie of Glasgow for this tyme provydeing that the Commissioners of the shyre doe consent as the toun hes desyred and Recomends to the Lords Commissioners of the theasurie to give them what assistance they can for armes and amunition But because that is uncertain that they doe the best they can, to provyde themselves, the magazine being verie Emptie.

At Edinburgh 21 May 1692

A1692/5/1461

Act

Act for the town of Glasgow for levying a regiment of men

Regarding the petition given in to the lords of their majesties’ privy council by the magistrates and council of the city of Glasgow for themselves and their inhabitants, showing that where by a former address to the king and queen’s majesties presented to the council, the petitioners freely offered their lives and fortunes for their majesties’ service against the threatened invasion, in order whereto they have not only drawn out and mustered their fencible men, but have also resolved to make up a regiment of foot whom they will maintain and pay weekly during the apprehension of this invasion that they may be in readiness to march as the council shall please to order them, and that without prejudice to their bringing out the rest of the fencible men in case of imminent danger. For the better performance whereof, the petitioners humbly represent to, and demand of the council: First that they may have their allowance for the raising and modelling of the said regiment with the assistance of one of the two independent companies ordered for Clydesdale as Sir Thomas Livingston, commander in chief of their majesties’ forces within this kingdom shall appoint, and that for the raising of the said regiment the petitioners may have joined to their city for this time only the two parishes of the barony of Glasgow and Govan that include their suburbs, and that with the consent of the shire; and Secondly that according to the act of convention produced such of there residing burgesses as are heritors of the shire and muster and join with the petitioners in the service may be excused from their personal attendance at the rendezvous of the shire; Thirdly that such heritors of the shire as are residing burgesses in that city and shall not take the engagement according to the proclamation shall be obliged to deliver up to them the horses with their trappings and arms in the manner therein specified, if the shire shall omit to take them from them; and Fourthly that seeing upon the recent search which the petitioners made by the council’s warrant that there was not above 200 pound weight of powder found in the place and that there may be also upon occasion some want of arms, the council would be pleased to appoint a certain quantity of powder to be laid up with them in magazine to be made use of or restored again as the event may happen, and likewise that the petitioners may have such allowance of arms as the commandant shall find necessary upon security for restoring the same; and therefore humbly craving that the said lords would be graciously pleased to grant and accord to the petitioners the premises, as the said petition bears. Which being read in presence of the said lords of privy council they by their deliverance of 20 May instant remit to a committee of their own number to consider how the things craved in the above petition might be granted and to report to the council, and the said committee having met and made their report, the said lords of their majesties’ privy council hereby authorize the city of Glasgow to levy a regiment and arm the 600 men, mentioned in their instructions from the provost of Glasgow and to name their officers, and they grant warrant to the said Sir Thomas Livingston to send one of the independent companies to Glasgow, and the lords hereby exempt those in the city who have estates in the country from randezvousing with the heritors of the shire, and they appoint the magistrates of Glasgow to offer them the engagement, and if they accept it not the oath of allegiance and assurance in the same way as is appointed by the recent proclamation for the shire, and in case of their refusal to seize their horses and arms, and they allow the two parishes, viz the Barony of Glasgow and Govan, to be joined to the city of Glasgow for this time, providing that the commissioners of the shire consent as the town has desired, and they recommend to the lords commissioners of the treasury to give them the assistance they can for arms and ammunition, but because that is uncertain, that they do the best they can to provide themselves, the magazine being very empty.

1. PC1/48, 213-15.

1. PC1/48, 213-15.

Procedure, 21 May 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie First day of Maij Jaj vjc and nyntie tuo years

A1692/5/1451

Procedure

Comittee anent John Hacquett

The Lords of there majesties privie Councill Doe hereby Recomend to the Lord Raith Theasurer deput, The Lord Cardross and Sir William Lockhart to Examine John Hacquett suspected to be a priest and now prisoner in the tolbooth of Edinburgh anent the pass produced be the said John How he came by the said pass and anent what Imployment he hes been or at present is in.

At Edinburgh 21 May 1692

A1692/5/1451

Procedure

Committee regarding John Halkett

The lords of their majesties’ privy council hereby recommend to Lord Raith, treasurer depute, Lord Cardross and Sir William Lockhart to examine John Halkett, suspected to be a priest and now a prisoner in the tolbooth of Edinburgh regarding the pass produced by the said John how he came by the said pass and in what employment he has been or at present is.

1. PC1/48, 213.

1. PC1/48, 213.