Order, 23 January 1694, Edinburgh

Edinburgh The Twentie thrid day of January Jaj vjc nyntie four years

D1694/1/161

Order

Recomendatione to the thesaurie Mr Alexander Pitcairne

Anent a Petitione given in to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councill be Mr Alexander Pitcairne principall of the divinity of Collodge of St Andrewes Shewing That quher the petitioners father haveing Sustained very great Losses by a Company of Lawlessmen in disguse under Cloud of night who did spoill and robb his house and Caried away to the value of Thrie Thousand merks as wes instructed before his Majestie and estates of parliament and haveing applyed from time to time to the estates of parliament and obtained diverse remitts to the Lords of the privy Councill Which hitherto to were in effectuall because of the petitioners Constant adherence to this forme of Church government at present be Law established, Wherfor he did of new apply to the last sessione of this Current parliament in June Last and did Represent his Loss and former Remitts and Craved that the honorable estates of parliament would appoint the petitioner to be satisfied of the said soume of Thrie Thousand merks out of the vaccand stipends or any other way should be thought most expedient, In Consideratione of which petition his Majesties high Commissioner and the honoraball estates of parliament did Remit the supplicant to the saids Lords In order to the repairatione of his damnadges out of said vaccand stipends And Seeing it will be ane act highly worthie of the saids Lords Justice and goodness to put ane end to the petitioners frequent and expensive applicationes Wherby his Loss is vastly increased Rather then And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords to appoint the Collector of the vaccand stipends to make payment to the petitioner of the said soumes of Thrie Thousand merks for repairatione of his said damnadges In Consideration of the act and Remitt of Parliament therwith given in as the said petitione bears The Lords of their Majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this petitione given in to them be the above Mr Alexander Pitcairne They heirby Seriously Recommend to the Lords Commissioners of their majesties thesaurie To Consider the petitione and act or Remitt of parliament mentioned therin, And produced therwith And to cause effectuall payment to be made to the petitioner of the above Soume of Thrie thousand merks Conforme to the said act and Remitt of Parliament.

Edinburgh The Twentie thrid day of January Jaj vjc nyntie four years

D1694/1/161

Order

Recomendatione to the thesaurie Mr Alexander Pitcairne

Anent a Petitione given in to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councill be Mr Alexander Pitcairne principall of the divinity of Collodge of St Andrewes Shewing That quher the petitioners father haveing Sustained very great Losses by a Company of Lawlessmen in disguse under Cloud of night who did spoill and robb his house and Caried away to the value of Thrie Thousand merks as wes instructed before his Majestie and estates of parliament and haveing applyed from time to time to the estates of parliament and obtained diverse remitts to the Lords of the privy Councill Which hitherto to were in effectuall because of the petitioners Constant adherence to this forme of Church government at present be Law established, Wherfor he did of new apply to the last sessione of this Current parliament in June Last and did Represent his Loss and former Remitts and Craved that the honorable estates of parliament would appoint the petitioner to be satisfied of the said soume of Thrie Thousand merks out of the vaccand stipends or any other way should be thought most expedient, In Consideratione of which petition his Majesties high Commissioner and the honoraball estates of parliament did Remit the supplicant to the saids Lords In order to the repairatione of his damnadges out of said vaccand stipends And Seeing it will be ane act highly worthie of the saids Lords Justice and goodness to put ane end to the petitioners frequent and expensive applicationes Wherby his Loss is vastly increased Rather then And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords to appoint the Collector of the vaccand stipends to make payment to the petitioner of the said soumes of Thrie Thousand merks for repairatione of his said damnadges In Consideration of the act and Remitt of Parliament therwith given in as the said petitione bears The Lords of their Majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this petitione given in to them be the above Mr Alexander Pitcairne They heirby Seriously Recommend to the Lords Commissioners of their majesties thesaurie To Consider the petitione and act or Remitt of parliament mentioned therin, And produced therwith And to cause effectuall payment to be made to the petitioner of the above Soume of Thrie thousand merks Conforme to the said act and Remitt of Parliament.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 320r-320v.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 320r-320v.

Sederunt, 23 January 1694, Edinburgh

Edinburgh The Twentie thrid day of January Jaj vjc nyntie four years1

D1694/1/152

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Southerland; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Raith; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Advocat; Lord Enstruther; Sir Thomas Livingstone

Edinburgh The Twentie thrid day of January Jaj vjc nyntie four years1

D1694/1/152

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Southerland; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Raith; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Advocat; Lord Enstruther; Sir Thomas Livingstone

1. NRS, PC2/24, 320r.

2. NRS, PC2/24, 320r.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 320r.

2. NRS, PC2/24, 320r.

Act, 23 January 1694, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie third day of January Jaj vic nyntie four years

A1694/1/371

Act

Act Uilliam Uallace messenger

Anent the petitione Given in to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councell Be William Wallace messenger in Montross Sheuing That quher the petitioner as ane messenger be vertue of the Act and proclamatione emitted in September Jaj vic Eightie nyne years Requyring all persones of publict trust to take the oath of alleadgance before the persones therinmentioned Commissionat for that effect betuixt and ane perramptor day therincontained In obedience to which proclamatione the petitioner did take the oath of alleadgance in the statione of ane Messenger and that before James Mudie Baillie in Montross Commissioner to their Majesties parliament as ane testificat therof produced under his hand did sufficiently testifie And farder the petitioner in obedience to ane other Act of the Currant parliament anno Jaj vic nyntie one Requyring persones in publict trust to subscribe the assurance before the shirreffs of the respective shires and such others as were therin nominat be the saids Lords for that effect The petitioner did most uillingly and readily doe the same before the shirreff of Forfar as ane testificat under the hand of Mr John Lyon shirreff clark did testifie And therfore the petitioner did Humbly Conceave that he had fullfilled the uill of both Acts And that by the late Act of parliament Requyring all persones therincontained to take the oath of alleadgance and subscribe the assurance The same did not reach him seing it specially declares that such who have before taken the same and the assurance were not then againe obleidged to take the said oath and assurance in the same Cappacity they formerly took it And so it was the petitioner took the same as a Messenger and still Continoued in the same statione And yet for the more punctuall obedience to the Law The petitioner was Inclyned and on his Journey coming to Edinburgh at the dyet appoynted to attend the Lyon to advyse if it were necessar for him againe to take the saids oaths before the Lyon Court And the petitioner being the only trustie man of his Calling uithin the shyres of Aberdeen Mairns and Angus He was taken by the way by John Lundie younger of Balldastard subtackseman of the Bishops rents of these three shyres And for ane months tyme keeped him for Ingathering charging poynding and apprehending these persones disobedient and deficient In payment of their proportions for Ingathering the same for their Majesties behoofe And therfore Considering the petitioners Circumstances and that the same are very favourable And therfore Supplicating to the effect underwryten as the said petitione Bears The Lords of their Majesties privy Councell Having Considered the forsaid petitione given in to them Be the above William Wallace uith the testificats mentioned therin and produced therwith They doe Heirby appoynte the petitioner yet to take and suear the oath of alleadgance and signe the assurance before any of the baillies of Montross Upon doing quherof they heirby declare the petitioner for the tyme past to have been and for the tyme coming to be Capable of the full and free exercise of his office of a messenger as if he had taken both the oath of alleadgance and assurance Before the Lord Lyon since the late Act of parliament and in the termes therof seing that he was necessarly called away when he was coming to Edinburgh to take them after making of the Act of parliament The petitioner alwayes transmitting the said oath of alleadgance and assurance so suorne and signed by the said Baillie himself to the Clarks of privy Councell uithin the space of tuenty dayes after the date heirof

At Edinburgh 23 January 1694

A1694/1/371

Act

Act William Wallace messenger

Concerning the petition given in to the lords of their majesties’ privy council by William Wallace, messenger in Montrose, showing that where the petitioner as a messenger be virtue of the act and proclamation emitted in September 1689 requiring all persons of public trust to take the oath of allegiance before the persons therein mentioned commissioned for that effect between [then] and a peremptory day therein contained, in obedience to which proclamation the petitioner did take the oath of allegiance in the station of a messenger, and that before James Mudie, bailie in Montrose, commissioner to their majesties’ parliament, as a testimony thereof produced under his hand did sufficiently testify. And further, the petitioner in obedience to another act of the currant parliament 1691 requiring persons in public trust to subscribe the assurance before the sheriffs of the respective shires and such others as were therein nominated by the said lords for that effect, the petitioner did most willingly and readily do the same before the sheriff of Forfar, as a testimony under the hand of Mr John Lyon, sheriff clerk did testify, and therefore the petitioner did humbly conceive that he had fulfilled the will of both acts. And that by the late act of parliament requiring all persons therein contained to take the oath of allegiance and subscribe the assurance, the same did not reach him, seeing it specially declares that such who have before taken the same and the assurance were not then again obliged to take the said oath and assurance in the same capacity they formerly took it, and so it was the petitioner took the same as a messenger and still continued in the same station. And yet for the more punctual obedience to the law, the petitioner was inclined and on his journey coming to Edinburgh at the diet appointed to attend the lyon to advise if it were necessary for him again to take the said oaths before the lyon court, and the petitioner being the only trusty man of his calling within the shires of Aberdeen, Mairns [Kincardine], and Angus, he was taken by the way by John Lundie, younger of Baldastard sub-tacksman of the bishop’s rents of these three shires, and for a month’s time kept him for ingathering, charging, poinding, and apprehending those persons disobedient and deficient in payment of their proportions for ingathering the same for their majesties’ behove. And therefore considering the petitioner’s circumstances and that the same are very favourable and therefore supplicating to the effect underwritten as the said petition bears. The lords of their majesties’ privy council having considered the foresaid petition given in to them by the above William Wallace, with the testimonials mentioned therein and produced therewith, they do hereby appoint the petitioner yet to take and swear the oath of allegiance and sign the assurance before any of the bailies of Montrose, upon doing whereof they hereby declare the petitioner for the time past to have been and for the time coming to be capable of the full and free exercise of his office of a messenger as if he had taken both the oath of allegiance and assurance before the lord lyon since the late act of parliament and in the terms thereof, seeing that he was necessarily called away when he was coming to Edinburgh to take them after making of the act of parliament, the petitioner always transmitting the said oath of allegiance and assurance so sworn and signed by the said bailie himself to the clerks of privy council within the space of 20 days after the date hereof.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 232-4.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 232-4.

Act, 23 January 1694, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie third day of January Jaj vic nyntie four years

A1694/1/361

Act

Liberatione Malcolme of Balbedie

Anent the petitione Given In to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councell Be Michaell Malcolme of Ballbedie Sheuing that the petitioner had Continoued prisoner uithin the tolbooth of Edinburgh these seven months bygone wherby not only his health was Greatly Impaired But lykewayes his affairs were fallen in great disordor through the want of the petitioners presence for the manadgement therof Lykeas the petitioner had affairs of very great Importance uith Dam Anna Murray Lady Kinfauns his mother in law as also with Dam Margaret Arnot Lady Balbedie his oune mother who were both daingerously sick and in all probability on death bed as ane testificat theruith produced did declare And seing ther2 Conditions uould not allow them to waite upon the petitioner in the tolbooth of Edinburgh wher he was prisoner and that it uould tend very much to the petitioners prejudice and Loss if they or aither of them shall happen to dye befor affairs be adjusted betuixt him and them And therfore Humbly Supplicating to the effect underwryten as the said petitione bears The Lords of their Majesties privy Councell Having Considered the forsaid petitione given in to them be the above Michaell Malcolme uith the Certificat under the hands of a phisitiane and the minister of Perth That the Lady Kinfauns hes by reasone of old age and sickness keeped her chamber closs these fyve years bygone so that she is not able to travell abroad And ane other Certificat under the hands of a phisitian and a Minister and tuo Landed persones Bearing that the Lady Balbedie had been and was exceedingly sick and in Great dainger They heirby Give ordor and warrand to the magistrates of Edinburgh and keeper of their tolbooth3 and keeper of their tolbooth to sett the petitioner at Liberty furth therof In respect he hes Given bond and found sufficient Cautione acted in the books of privy Councell that he shall reenter prisoner within the said tolbooth betuixt and the fifteenth day of February nixt to Come And in the mean tyme that he shall Live peacably under and uith all submissione to the present government of their Majesties King William and Queen Mary And that he shall not Act consult nor Contryve any thing in prejudice therof nor Converss or Correspond uith any rebells And that he shall appear befor the saids Lords of privie Councell if called for betuixt and the said day under the penaltie of five hundreth pounds sterline In caise he shall transgress in any part of the premisses

At Edinburgh 23 January 1694

A1694/1/361

Act

Liberation Malcolm of Balbedie

Concerning the petition given in to the lords of their majesties’ privy council by Michael Malcolm of Balbedie, showing that the petitioner has continued prisoner within the tolbooth of Edinburgh these seven months bygone, whereby not only his health was greatly impaired, but likewise his affairs were fallen in great disorder through the want of the petitioner’s presence for the management thereof. Likewise the petitioner had affairs of very great importance with Dame Anna Murray, Lady Kinfauns, his mother-in-law, as also with Dame Margaret Arnott, Lady Balbedie, his own mother, who were both dangerously sick and in all probability on death bed, as a testimony therewith produced did declare. And seeing their conditions would not allow them to wait upon the petitioner in the tolbooth of Edinburgh where he was prisoner, and that it would tend very much to the petitioner’s prejudice and loss if they or either of them shall happen to die before affairs be adjusted between him and them, and therefore humbly supplicating to the effect underwritten, as the said petition bears. The lords of their majesties’ privy council having considered the foresaid petition given in to them by the above Michael Malcolm, with the certificate under the hands of a physician and the minister of Perth that the Lady Kinfauns has by reason of old age and sickness kept her chamber close these five years bygone, so that she is not able to travel abroad, and another certificate under the hands of a physician and a minister and two landed persons bearing that the Lady Balbedie had been and was exceedingly sick and in great danger, they hereby give order and warrant to the magistrates of Edinburgh and keeper of their tolbooth to set the petitioner at liberty forth thereof, in respect he has given bond and found sufficient caution acted in the books of privy council that he shall re-enter prisoner within the said tolbooth between [now] and 15 February next to come, and in the meantime that he shall live peaceably under and with all submission to the present government of their Majesties King William and Queen Mary. And that he shall not act, consult, nor contrive anything in prejudice thereof, nor converse or correspond with any rebels. And that he shall appear before the said lords of privy council if called for between [now] and the said day under the penalty of £500 Sterling in case he shall transgress in any part of the premisses.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 231-2.

2. The word ‘probation’ scored out here.

3. The phrase ‘to the magistrates of Edinburgh and keeper of their tolbooth’ is an insertion.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 231-2.

2. The word ‘probation’ scored out here.

3. The phrase ‘to the magistrates of Edinburgh and keeper of their tolbooth’ is an insertion.

Act, 23 January 1694, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie third day of January Jaj vic nyntie four years

A1694/1/351

Act

Liberatione Sir William Bruce

Anent The petitione given in to the Lords of their Majesties privy Councell Be Sir William Bruce of Kinross Sheuing That the petitioner at his attendance upon the saids Lords near Eight months agoe was made prisoner in the Castle of Stirline wher he had for soe many months Continoued under Infirmities of old age and of many other evills which he uould not Give their Lordships the trowble to know Besyds the great prejudice of his particular affairs which the petitioner desyred might be rather taken Into their favourable consideratione then particularly urged be him And the petitioner having alwayes Lived peacably for which he was Content not only to find Cautione to Continow still to doe but lykewayes to Compear before the saids Lords when called for And therfore supplicating to the effect underwryten as the said petitione Bears The Lords of their Majesties privie Councell Having Considered the forsaid petitione given in to them be the above Sir William Bruce They heirby Give ordor and warrand to Leivt Coll John Areskine Leivt Governour of the Castle of Stirline and in his absence to the nixt Commanding officer ther To sett the petitioner at Liberty furth of the said Castle And Confynes him to his oune house of Kinross and a Myll about the same In respect he hes Given bond and found sufficient Cautione acted in the books of privy Councell That he shall straight way repaire from the said Castle of Stirline to his said house of Kinross And that he shall remaine Confyned therat and uithin a myll about the same and not Goe uithout the bounds of his said Confynment And that he shall re-enter himself prisoner uithin the said Castle of Stirline betuixt and the first teusday of march nixt And in the mean tyme that he shall Live peacably under and uith all submissione to the present government of their Majesties King William and Queen Mary And that he shall not Act Consult nor Contryve any thing in prejudice therof Nor Converss or Correspond uith any rebells And shall appear before the saids Lords of privie Councell if called for before the said day under the penaltie of fyve hundreth pounds sterline In caise he shall transgress in any part of the premisses

At Edinburgh 23 January 1694

A1694/1/351

Act

Liberation Sir William Bruce

Concerning the petition given in to the lords of their majesties’ privy council by Sir William Bruce of Kinross, showing that the petitioner at his attendance upon the said lords near eight months ago was made prisoner in the castle of Stirling, where he had for so many months continued under infirmities of old age and of many other evils which he would not give their Lordships the trouble to know, besides the great prejudice of his particular affairs, which the petitioner desired might be rather taken into their favourable consideration than particularly urged by him. And the petitioner having always lived peaceably, for which he was content not only to find caution to continue still to do, but likewise to appear before the said lords when called for, and therefore supplicating to the effect underwritten as the said petition bears. The lords of their majesties’ privy council having considered the foresaid petition given in to them by the above Sir William Bruce, they hereby give order and warrant to Lieutenant Colonel John Erskine, lieutenant governor of the castle of Stirling, and in his absence to the next commanding officer there, to set the petitioner at liberty forth of the said castle, and [they] confine him to his own house of Kinross and a mile about the same, in respect he has given bond and found sufficient caution acted in the books of privy council that he shall straight away repair from the said castle of Stirling to his said house of Kinross, and that he shall remain confined thereat and within a mile about the same and not go without the bounds of his said confinement. And that he shall re-enter himself prisoner within the said castle of Stirling between [now] and the first Tuesday of March next. And in the meantime that he shall live peaceably under and with all submission to the present government of their majesties King William and Queen Mary. And that he shall not act, consult, nor contrive anything in prejudice thereof, nor converse or correspond with any rebels. And shall appear before the said lords of privy council if called for before the said day under the penalty of £500 Sterling in case he shall transgress in any part of the premisses.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 231.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 231.

Warrant, 23 January 1694, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie third day of January Jaj vic nyntie four years

A1694/1/341

Warrant

Warrand to Sir Gilbert Eliot to delyver to John Linlithgow his papers

The Lords of their Majesties privie Councell Doe Heirby ordaine Sir Gilbert Eliot one of their Clarks, to delyver back to John Linlithgow Late Clerk to the Commissioners of supply uithin the shyre of Selkirk the whole papers lately produced in the hands of the said Sir Gilbert by the said John And ordaines him of new to delyver in to the said Sir Gilbert upon oath In presence of one of the Lords of privie Councell such of these wrytes as belong to the Militia and Levys allenarly to be by the Clarks of Councell delyvered up to Alexander Young present Clark to the saids Commissioners of supply upon his recept therof Nota thir wrytes are delyvered Accordingly

At Edinburgh 23 January 1694

A1694/1/341

Warrant

Warrant to Sir Gilbert Elliot to deliver to John Linlithgow his papers

The lords of their majesties’ privy council do hereby ordain Sir Gilbert Elliot, one of their clerks, to deliver back to John Linlithgow, late clerk to the commissioners of supply within the shire of Selkirk, the whole papers lately produced in the hands of the said Sir Gilbert by the said John, and ordain him of new to deliver in to the said Sir Gilbert upon oath in presence of one of the lords of privy council such of these writs as belong to the militia and levies only, to be by the clerks of council delivered up to Alexander Young, present clerk to the said commissioners of supply upon his receipt thereof. Nota these writs are delivered accordingly.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 230.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 230.

Sederunt, 23 January 1694, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Tuentie third day of January Jaj vic nyntie four years1

A1694/1/332

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Earl of Southerland; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Leven; Earl of Forfar; Viscount Tarbat; Lord Raith; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Advocat; Lord Anstruther; Sir Thomas Livingstoun

At Edinburgh 23 January 16941

A1694/1/332

Sederunt

[John Hay, earl of Tweeddale] lord chancellor; [George Gordon] earl of Sutherland; [George Livingston] earl of Linlithgow; [David Melville] earl of Leven; [George Mackenzie] viscount of Tarbat; [Alexander Melville] Lord Raith; [John Hamilton] Lord Belhaven; [Sir James Stewart of Goodtrees], lord advocate; [William] Lord Anstruther; Sir Thomas Livingstone

1. NRS, PC1/49, 230.

2. NRS, PC1/49, 230.

1. NRS, PC1/49, 230.

2. NRS, PC1/49, 230.