Sederunt, 14 December 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh 14th December 17041

D1704/12/62

Sederunt

Lord Chancelour; Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Craufurd; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Balcarras; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Earl of Ruglen; Lord Belhaven; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Halcraig; Lord Anstruther; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fran: Montgomry; Laird of Blackadder; Laird of Ormistoun younger; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Edinburgh 14th December 17041

D1704/12/62

Sederunt

Lord Chancelour; Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Craufurd; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Balcarras; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Earl of Ruglen; Lord Belhaven; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Halcraig; Lord Anstruther; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fran: Montgomry; Laird of Blackadder; Laird of Ormistoun younger; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/28, 340v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 340v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 340v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 340v.

Act, 12 December 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh 12th December 1704

D1704/12/51

Act

Act for expences in favours of Hamilton of Cowbardie and John Duff

Anent the petition given in and presented unto the right Honorable the Lord high Chancellour and remanent Lords of her Majesties most honorable privie Councill by James Hamilton of Cowbardie and John Duff Messenger, Shewing That where Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun, now of Gight did raise befor their Lordships a most calumnious and injurious proces againest them, alleadging that they had inhumanly maletreat, and beat him at his own house, after they had been kyndly entertained by him at Supper, on Saturday being the sixteenth of September last, and did must unwarrantably execute a Caption againest him, upon the following Sunday morning, when he was convoying them to their horses, and keeping him some dayes in Custody, did extort bonds for ane extravigant penaltie for produceing and delivering of a Contract of Marriage, past betwixt Gight and his Ladie And which Cowbairdie had borrowed from the Lady Gight elder, now Spous to Generall Major Buchan And which he had lent to the Lady Gight younger and was under Caption for the same, in the hands of Master Duff, at the instance of the Lady Gight elder, and Generall Major Buchan her Husband, They did raise a Reconvention againest Gights most injurious lybell, and did Show it to their Lordships, both in their Answers to the lybell, and in the Reconvention, how great Services and kyndnesses Cowbardie had done to the Family of Gight, in preserving it by his Credit and Interest, almost from utter ruine And how ungratfully this Gight Suffered Cowbardy to be treated upon his account, in not delivering of the forsaid Contract, which he had borrowed from the Lady Gight elder, and lent to the Lady Gight younger to be restored on demand, Notwithstanding he had been under Caption upon that account, for the Space of ten dayes preceiding, and was just going to be carried to prison from Gights own house, and in Gights own presence, after he had been sent for to come to his said house, to accomodat and end that matter, and after he had sent Mr Duff the Messenger, with one Mr Gordon of Towie, to interceed with Generall Major Buchan and his Lady for a fourthnights forbearance to Cowbairdie upon his granting a bond, to deliver the Contract, or a registrat double therof, under the pain of Six Thousand, Six hundereth, and Sixtie Six pound Threttein Shilling, and Four pennies Scots money, from which condition and treaty, when accorded to, by the Major Generall, and his Lady, He did most Shamfully resile althrough it was in his power instantly to liberat Cowbardie, by delivering the Contract, or performing the condition forsaid, all which matter of fact, is more fully and circumstantiatly contained in their printed answers to which they referr, Their Lordships admitted both the lybell and Reconvention to probation, and accordingly probation being ledd upon both, their Lordships at advyseing of the same, Found the persuers lybell not proven, but found the Reconvention at their instance Sufficiently proven And therfore they did now humbly Represent to their Lordships that Seeing this lybell raised againest them is of all the most calumnious and grossly mistaken, that ever was being raised againest persons who acted all in2 their power for the Service of Gight, and after Gight was liberat without any maner of Concussion (tho he most calumniously lybells the same) in the presence of the right Honorable the Earle of Aberdein, and Lord Haddo his Son, and some other Gentlemen as was fully proven, by the witnesses in their Reconvention Its most humbly hoped that their Lordships would take serious Consideration of the same, especially considering that the Calumny off it was yet more gross and unaccountable; in regaird befor he raised the said injurious persuite and lybell of ryot and Concussion he after his liberation when he was at absolute freedome, did in obtemperance to the said transaction, registrat the said Contract, And did offerr ane extract therof, to the said Major Generall Buchan, which the Major perceiving to be vitiat did not accept of all which being evidently made out to their Lordships, They humbly hope and expect, that Such gross and unparelled deeds of Ingratitude, manifest and willfull deeds of oppression, in conveening them, upon Such a Scandalous and calumnious lybell, will meet with their Lordships due Censor And in respect the same has putt them to heavie and great charges and expenses, Besydes the Damnadge which they had Sufferred in being so justly abstracted from their affairs, which expense and Damnadge did truly Surmount the soume lybelled in their Reconvention, and Seeing the lybell was found not proven, which was sufficient to found them in the demand of their expences Yet Seeing their Reconvention was found justly proven wherby they had instructed his lybell in every poynt, to be willfully and maliciously calumnious and injurious to the highest degree, They humbly hope and expect their Lordships will condemn him in their expences and damnadges which they had Sufferred by the raiseing of this unjust proces againest them, which are verie great and heavie Otherwise the persuer had gained his purpose, in malicisouly and calumniously prosecuteing them, which is all the design of calumnious pursuers, Notwithstanding of their Lordships having found his lybell not proven, and their Reconvention Sufficiently proven, which they humbly expect their Lordships justice will never allow And therfore Craving it might please their Lordships to Consider the premisses, and to condemn the said Laird of Gight in the soume of Three Thousand Merks, as their expensses and Damnadges, truly Sustained by them, thorow, and Since his raiseing and intenting the forsaid calumnious pursuite befor their Lordships, againest them, As the said petition bears, Which petition being Upon the fyfth day of December instant, read in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill they allowed the samen to be seen and answered by Davidson of Gight next Councill day peremptorie, Therafter upon the Seventh day of the said moneth of December, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having again Considered the petition given in to them by Cowbairdie, and John Duff Messenger they heirby allow Gight to see and answer the samen Tuesday nixt peremptorie, Wherunto Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun, now of Gight, gave in a petition by way of answer, Shewing, That where James Hamilton of Cowbairdie, and John Duff messenger having presented a petition to their Lordships for recovering of the Laird of Gight what they had expended upon the account of a proces at his instance against them, Gight is hopefull that upon a just relation of matters of fact, Their Lordships will find the forsaid petition nothing, besydes a disingenous narrative, and ane absurd Conclusion, In the first place Cowbairdie represents the great Service he had done the Familie of Gight, as also he pretends, that Gight as haveing no Sense of them, Suffered him to be ill used by his not redelivering a Contract of Marriage, which Cowbairdie had borrowed from the Lady Gight elder, and lent to the Lady Gight younger to be restored on demand, To which it was answered, that notwithstanding of what Cowbardy pretends as to the ingadgment of his Credite and Interest for the preservation of the Family of Gight, it was nottour that he was never at any trouble or loss upon that account, And farder what Gight did in relation to the redelivery of the Contract of Marriadge, was by Cowbairdies own Speciall advice, for Cowbairdie understanding that he was persued for production of the said Contract, came and desyred Gight not to produce the same, assuring him if he did, it would ruine him, and his Family, wherfore at Cowbairdies desyre Gight haveing granted a bond to Cowbairdie to refound any damnadge or Skaith Should happen to him, upon his not produceing the Contract, Cowbairdie Swore he would retire Sometyme to Lochaber, then give up a Contract of Marriage, which could not chuse but ruine Gights family, And then about ten dayes befor the bussiness (which had been the ground of this persuite) happened, Gight and his Lady obtested Cowbairdie that he would not expose himselfe to come inconveniencie upon their account, but Seeing he had been upon all occasions verie Serviceable to them by his good advice they would rather give up the Contract then Sufferr him to be distressed, To which Cowbairdie answered that he would rather Sufferr the outmost hardshipe then deliver up the Contract of marriage, and that he looked upon this resolution and advice, to be a just attonment and Circumvention as Gights and his Ladies Contract of Marriadge was, which was evident to any who will be at pains to read it, As to Gights lybell being calumnious which was the only conclusive argument for expences It was answered, That Gights lybell could noways be said to be calumnious, as appears by the Depositions of the Witnesses adduced both in the lybell and Reconvention, for through Gight was So unfortunate as by their Lordships Sentence to be found to have Succumbed in the probation of his lybell, by not being allowed to make use of his Domestick Witnesses and others, which he could have had if their health could have allowed them to have been present, wherof if their Lordships doubt, Gight was ready to produce ane attestation from the physicians upon Soul and Conscience, that they were in no Condition to travell, yet what was proven on Gights pairt, was Sufficient to free him of the accusation of calumny and by consequences from being Condemned, in expenses on that account, For first Robert Mitchell Deponed that it was betwixt one and two of the cloak on the morning of the Lords day when the Caption was execute againest Gight by John Duff, and through the other witnes Adam Panton could not be so positive, as to the tyme of the execution, yet Since his Deposition does not contradict the former, and Considering what past from their arryvall at Gights house (which according to all the witnesses, was near nyne of the Cloack upon Saturday nght) till their Departure, at which tyme the Caption was execute, as the bringing a Sheep from the pasture halfe a mile of killing and dressing it for Supper, also the Gentlemen Supping and drinking heartily after, it was more then a base presumption againest Duff, that the Caption was execute at the tyme lybelled, Therfore as to that poynt Gight cannot be lyable for expences upon the head of Calumny, Secondly that the Caption was execute in a ryotous and violent maner so as to free from all Calumny, is as evident, for albeit both Gights witnesses did not aggree in every Circumstance yet as to the violence they both aggree, both Deponing that they saw Gight blooding, as also that they Saw Robert Gordon take Gight by the Arm, and heard say if he were not a prisoner, he would trample him among the hose foot, Lykwise […] Gordon witnes for Cowbardie, and Adam Panton witnes for Gight depone that in a Struggle betwixt Gight and Mr Duff, Gights sword was broken in the Sheath, which was sufficient demonstration of nonressistance on Gights pairt, and barbarous hard useage on Duffs pairt, which did not Stopp him for having forced him from of his own horse upon Cowbairdies horse, they carried him away more like a nottorious Criminall then like a Gentleman prisoner by a civill dilligence, Swearing they would carry him where none concerned him Should hear of him, wherfor it was plain that Gight could not be thought calumnious in that poynt either, for through these poynts were not so liquidly proven as to determine their Lordships to proceed to condemnation of the Defenders, yet Gight was assured their Lordships would be convinced he had not been calumnious in that affair, And therfor Craving it might please their Lordships to take the matter to their Serious Consideration and lest that in tymecomeing others rendered too apprehensive of the event of their probation, might be deterred from persueing injuries, wherof they might have just reason to complain, to assoilzie Gight from the expences persued for, especially Considering that Cowbardie and Mr Duff defenders in his proces had Craved his oath of Calumny if he had just reason to persue the Complaint He gave his oath of Calumny that he had just reason to persue the said Complaint, and when any man gives his oath of Calumny upon a lybell, especially when Craved be the Defender he is understood in Law to have just ground to persue the action, and so cannot be lyable to expences as the said Answers bears, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them by James Hamilton of Cowbairdie, and John Duff Messenger, Together with ane other petition by way of Answers therto by Alixander Davidsone younger of Newtoun, now of Gight, And the samen being read in their presence, The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Council have Modified and Granted, and heirby Modifies and Grants the Soume of One Thousand merks scots money to be payed to the said James Hamilton of Cowbardie and John Duff by the said Alexander Davidsone of Gight for their expences, in the mutuall processes hinc inde againest offers, and appoynts and ordains the said Alexander Davidson instantly to make payment there accordingly, and appoynts letters of horning under the Signet of Councill, upon the dayes to be direct heirupon as effeirs.

Edinburgh 12th December 1704

D1704/12/51

Act

Act for expences in favours of Hamilton of Cowbardie and John Duff

Anent the petition given in and presented unto the right Honorable the Lord high Chancellour and remanent Lords of her Majesties most honorable privie Councill by James Hamilton of Cowbardie and John Duff Messenger, Shewing That where Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun, now of Gight did raise befor their Lordships a most calumnious and injurious proces againest them, alleadging that they had inhumanly maletreat, and beat him at his own house, after they had been kyndly entertained by him at Supper, on Saturday being the sixteenth of September last, and did must unwarrantably execute a Caption againest him, upon the following Sunday morning, when he was convoying them to their horses, and keeping him some dayes in Custody, did extort bonds for ane extravigant penaltie for produceing and delivering of a Contract of Marriage, past betwixt Gight and his Ladie And which Cowbairdie had borrowed from the Lady Gight elder, now Spous to Generall Major Buchan And which he had lent to the Lady Gight younger and was under Caption for the same, in the hands of Master Duff, at the instance of the Lady Gight elder, and Generall Major Buchan her Husband, They did raise a Reconvention againest Gights most injurious lybell, and did Show it to their Lordships, both in their Answers to the lybell, and in the Reconvention, how great Services and kyndnesses Cowbardie had done to the Family of Gight, in preserving it by his Credit and Interest, almost from utter ruine And how ungratfully this Gight Suffered Cowbardy to be treated upon his account, in not delivering of the forsaid Contract, which he had borrowed from the Lady Gight elder, and lent to the Lady Gight younger to be restored on demand, Notwithstanding he had been under Caption upon that account, for the Space of ten dayes preceiding, and was just going to be carried to prison from Gights own house, and in Gights own presence, after he had been sent for to come to his said house, to accomodat and end that matter, and after he had sent Mr Duff the Messenger, with one Mr Gordon of Towie, to interceed with Generall Major Buchan and his Lady for a fourthnights forbearance to Cowbairdie upon his granting a bond, to deliver the Contract, or a registrat double therof, under the pain of Six Thousand, Six hundereth, and Sixtie Six pound Threttein Shilling, and Four pennies Scots money, from which condition and treaty, when accorded to, by the Major Generall, and his Lady, He did most Shamfully resile althrough it was in his power instantly to liberat Cowbardie, by delivering the Contract, or performing the condition forsaid, all which matter of fact, is more fully and circumstantiatly contained in their printed answers to which they referr, Their Lordships admitted both the lybell and Reconvention to probation, and accordingly probation being ledd upon both, their Lordships at advyseing of the same, Found the persuers lybell not proven, but found the Reconvention at their instance Sufficiently proven And therfore they did now humbly Represent to their Lordships that Seeing this lybell raised againest them is of all the most calumnious and grossly mistaken, that ever was being raised againest persons who acted all in2 their power for the Service of Gight, and after Gight was liberat without any maner of Concussion (tho he most calumniously lybells the same) in the presence of the right Honorable the Earle of Aberdein, and Lord Haddo his Son, and some other Gentlemen as was fully proven, by the witnesses in their Reconvention Its most humbly hoped that their Lordships would take serious Consideration of the same, especially considering that the Calumny off it was yet more gross and unaccountable; in regaird befor he raised the said injurious persuite and lybell of ryot and Concussion he after his liberation when he was at absolute freedome, did in obtemperance to the said transaction, registrat the said Contract, And did offerr ane extract therof, to the said Major Generall Buchan, which the Major perceiving to be vitiat did not accept of all which being evidently made out to their Lordships, They humbly hope and expect, that Such gross and unparelled deeds of Ingratitude, manifest and willfull deeds of oppression, in conveening them, upon Such a Scandalous and calumnious lybell, will meet with their Lordships due Censor And in respect the same has putt them to heavie and great charges and expenses, Besydes the Damnadge which they had Sufferred in being so justly abstracted from their affairs, which expense and Damnadge did truly Surmount the soume lybelled in their Reconvention, and Seeing the lybell was found not proven, which was sufficient to found them in the demand of their expences Yet Seeing their Reconvention was found justly proven wherby they had instructed his lybell in every poynt, to be willfully and maliciously calumnious and injurious to the highest degree, They humbly hope and expect their Lordships will condemn him in their expences and damnadges which they had Sufferred by the raiseing of this unjust proces againest them, which are verie great and heavie Otherwise the persuer had gained his purpose, in malicisouly and calumniously prosecuteing them, which is all the design of calumnious pursuers, Notwithstanding of their Lordships having found his lybell not proven, and their Reconvention Sufficiently proven, which they humbly expect their Lordships justice will never allow And therfore Craving it might please their Lordships to Consider the premisses, and to condemn the said Laird of Gight in the soume of Three Thousand Merks, as their expensses and Damnadges, truly Sustained by them, thorow, and Since his raiseing and intenting the forsaid calumnious pursuite befor their Lordships, againest them, As the said petition bears, Which petition being Upon the fyfth day of December instant, read in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill they allowed the samen to be seen and answered by Davidson of Gight next Councill day peremptorie, Therafter upon the Seventh day of the said moneth of December, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having again Considered the petition given in to them by Cowbairdie, and John Duff Messenger they heirby allow Gight to see and answer the samen Tuesday nixt peremptorie, Wherunto Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun, now of Gight, gave in a petition by way of answer, Shewing, That where James Hamilton of Cowbairdie, and John Duff messenger having presented a petition to their Lordships for recovering of the Laird of Gight what they had expended upon the account of a proces at his instance against them, Gight is hopefull that upon a just relation of matters of fact, Their Lordships will find the forsaid petition nothing, besydes a disingenous narrative, and ane absurd Conclusion, In the first place Cowbairdie represents the great Service he had done the Familie of Gight, as also he pretends, that Gight as haveing no Sense of them, Suffered him to be ill used by his not redelivering a Contract of Marriage, which Cowbairdie had borrowed from the Lady Gight elder, and lent to the Lady Gight younger to be restored on demand, To which it was answered, that notwithstanding of what Cowbardy pretends as to the ingadgment of his Credite and Interest for the preservation of the Family of Gight, it was nottour that he was never at any trouble or loss upon that account, And farder what Gight did in relation to the redelivery of the Contract of Marriadge, was by Cowbairdies own Speciall advice, for Cowbairdie understanding that he was persued for production of the said Contract, came and desyred Gight not to produce the same, assuring him if he did, it would ruine him, and his Family, wherfore at Cowbairdies desyre Gight haveing granted a bond to Cowbairdie to refound any damnadge or Skaith Should happen to him, upon his not produceing the Contract, Cowbairdie Swore he would retire Sometyme to Lochaber, then give up a Contract of Marriage, which could not chuse but ruine Gights family, And then about ten dayes befor the bussiness (which had been the ground of this persuite) happened, Gight and his Lady obtested Cowbairdie that he would not expose himselfe to come inconveniencie upon their account, but Seeing he had been upon all occasions verie Serviceable to them by his good advice they would rather give up the Contract then Sufferr him to be distressed, To which Cowbairdie answered that he would rather Sufferr the outmost hardshipe then deliver up the Contract of marriage, and that he looked upon this resolution and advice, to be a just attonment and Circumvention as Gights and his Ladies Contract of Marriadge was, which was evident to any who will be at pains to read it, As to Gights lybell being calumnious which was the only conclusive argument for expences It was answered, That Gights lybell could noways be said to be calumnious, as appears by the Depositions of the Witnesses adduced both in the lybell and Reconvention, for through Gight was So unfortunate as by their Lordships Sentence to be found to have Succumbed in the probation of his lybell, by not being allowed to make use of his Domestick Witnesses and others, which he could have had if their health could have allowed them to have been present, wherof if their Lordships doubt, Gight was ready to produce ane attestation from the physicians upon Soul and Conscience, that they were in no Condition to travell, yet what was proven on Gights pairt, was Sufficient to free him of the accusation of calumny and by consequences from being Condemned, in expenses on that account, For first Robert Mitchell Deponed that it was betwixt one and two of the cloak on the morning of the Lords day when the Caption was execute againest Gight by John Duff, and through the other witnes Adam Panton could not be so positive, as to the tyme of the execution, yet Since his Deposition does not contradict the former, and Considering what past from their arryvall at Gights house (which according to all the witnesses, was near nyne of the Cloack upon Saturday nght) till their Departure, at which tyme the Caption was execute, as the bringing a Sheep from the pasture halfe a mile of killing and dressing it for Supper, also the Gentlemen Supping and drinking heartily after, it was more then a base presumption againest Duff, that the Caption was execute at the tyme lybelled, Therfore as to that poynt Gight cannot be lyable for expences upon the head of Calumny, Secondly that the Caption was execute in a ryotous and violent maner so as to free from all Calumny, is as evident, for albeit both Gights witnesses did not aggree in every Circumstance yet as to the violence they both aggree, both Deponing that they saw Gight blooding, as also that they Saw Robert Gordon take Gight by the Arm, and heard say if he were not a prisoner, he would trample him among the hose foot, Lykwise […] Gordon witnes for Cowbardie, and Adam Panton witnes for Gight depone that in a Struggle betwixt Gight and Mr Duff, Gights sword was broken in the Sheath, which was sufficient demonstration of nonressistance on Gights pairt, and barbarous hard useage on Duffs pairt, which did not Stopp him for having forced him from of his own horse upon Cowbairdies horse, they carried him away more like a nottorious Criminall then like a Gentleman prisoner by a civill dilligence, Swearing they would carry him where none concerned him Should hear of him, wherfor it was plain that Gight could not be thought calumnious in that poynt either, for through these poynts were not so liquidly proven as to determine their Lordships to proceed to condemnation of the Defenders, yet Gight was assured their Lordships would be convinced he had not been calumnious in that affair, And therfor Craving it might please their Lordships to take the matter to their Serious Consideration and lest that in tymecomeing others rendered too apprehensive of the event of their probation, might be deterred from persueing injuries, wherof they might have just reason to complain, to assoilzie Gight from the expences persued for, especially Considering that Cowbardie and Mr Duff defenders in his proces had Craved his oath of Calumny if he had just reason to persue the Complaint He gave his oath of Calumny that he had just reason to persue the said Complaint, and when any man gives his oath of Calumny upon a lybell, especially when Craved be the Defender he is understood in Law to have just ground to persue the action, and so cannot be lyable to expences as the said Answers bears, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them by James Hamilton of Cowbairdie, and John Duff Messenger, Together with ane other petition by way of Answers therto by Alixander Davidsone younger of Newtoun, now of Gight, And the samen being read in their presence, The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Council have Modified and Granted, and heirby Modifies and Grants the Soume of One Thousand merks scots money to be payed to the said James Hamilton of Cowbardie and John Duff by the said Alexander Davidsone of Gight for their expences, in the mutuall processes hinc inde againest offers, and appoynts and ordains the said Alexander Davidson instantly to make payment there accordingly, and appoynts letters of horning under the Signet of Councill, upon the dayes to be direct heirupon as effeirs.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 337v-340v.

2. The word ‘in’ is an insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 337v-340v.

2. The word ‘in’ is an insertion.

Decreet, 12 December 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh 12th December 1704

D1704/12/41

Decreet

Decreit Barbara Cockburne Lady Saintmartines against her Husband

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by Barbara Cockburne spous to the Laird of Saintmartines Humbly Shewing, That where the petitioner was married to James Dallas of Saintmartines upon the […] day of […] who verie shortly after their marriadge begann to treat the petitioner with extream rigour and unkyndness, which Nevertheless She Supported with all dutifull Submission and patience, and would have continued to the last moment of her lyfe to doe so, if her said Husband his inclemencie and hard useage had not broke out so openly, and in ane instance which did visiblie threaten the petitioners lyfe, and in such a maner as excluded all hopes of living in anie peace or saftie, with him heirafter, she did therfore humbly represent her distrest condition in the following Circumstances, and primo albeit the petitioners said husband was so conscious as to avoyd these things openly which might affoord a legall ground of Separation, yet she was not able to express the bitterness she mett with in secret, and which she could no otherwayes prove then by adduceing the Servants in the house, and these in the neighbourhood to witness the mournings which have been heard in the roume where the petitioner was shutt up with her husband and that she had been heard to walk barefooted diverse nights in that mourning condition, Secundo after a tract of severities, and when She came to be delivered of her Chyld she offered to prove by the neighbourhood and Servants in her Family that She continued to cry out in labour from ten at night to seven the nixt morning without having any help or assistance called, And then when a midwyfe was sent for, who was accidentally out of the way, and could not attend her selfe She sent another skilled woman to assist the petitioner, yet that woman was not suffered to give her any help, and unless it had been from the help which she received in her uttermost extremitie from another, the petitioners mother sent for she most have then perished with her Chyld, Tertio when her husband was quarrelled for so great a Cruelty he made frivolous and unsatisfactorie pretences, implyeing that this treatment had been studied, and to compleat all wished he had power to bring fyre from Heaven to consume the petitioner, and her Friends, Quarto, after so dangerous and hard useage She was deprived of the pleasure of Seeing her Infant, which was carried out of the house some few dayes after it was born, without somuch as ever letting her See it, or telling her whither it was Convoyed, Quinto by these hard useages the petitioner was brought to the danger of her lyfe which She offerred to prove, There were many other important circumstances which no doubt would concurr to Satisfie the Saids Lords of the necessitie of Separation, and which She was readie alse to prove, But these She only mentioned in generall out of the decent respect which She had to her husband, and most humblie beseeched their Lordships to believe that nothing could have made her to expose her misfortune and affliction in a Complaint of that nature, But a setled belieffe deryved from the sadd experience she had of her Husbands utter aversion to her, and that if any opposition were made by him to a Separation, it was not out of affection, and would inevitablie end in the petitioners ruine, And therfor Craving that it might have pleased the saids Lords to have granted warrand to have Cited the said James Dallas of Saintmartines the petitioners husband to Compear befor their Lordships, and to hear the forsaid circumstances particularly and generally abovementioned proven, and being proven to modifie her ane aliment as the said petition bears, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition given in to them by Barbara Cockburne Spouse to Saintmairtines, and the samen being Read in their presence, The saids Lords granted warrant to Meacers of privie Councill, or Messengers at arm’s to Cite the said James Dallas of Saintmairtnes the petitioners Husband to Compear befor the Saids Lords the fourteenth day of November instant to hear and See the Circumstances particularly and generally Contained in the above petition proven, And for that effect Granted warrant to the saids meacers or messengers to Cite Such witnesses as the petitioner Shall condescend, or for proving the matter Contained in the forsaid above petition to appear befor the saids Lords day and place forsaid and bear leall and Soothfast witnessing in Sua farras they know, or Shall be Speired at them in the forsaid matter, And Anent the charge given to the said James Dallas of Saintmartines to have Compeared befor the Saids Lords of privie Councill, in the terms of and with Certification conforme to the said acts as the samen more fully bears. And alse Anent the letters or lybell raised befor the saids Lords of privie Councill at the instance of Master James Dallas eldest lawfull son to George Dallas of Saintmartines, with concourse of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat for her highness interest, Makeing Mention That albeit by the Lawes of this and all Civilized nations the conjugall affection and Societie betwixt man and wife was to be incouradged, and if mistakes and misapprehensions fell out all good Christians are to divert them, and concurr to their removall, so that the affection betwixt man and wyfe might remain suitable to the relation, and not to instigate the one against the other, or to withdraw the wyfe from the Husband therby to alienat her affection, and in her name to raise Scandalous and opprobrious lybells against her Husband, in order to procure ane aliment, wherby to maintaine the authors of the division, Yet Nevertheless and without regaird to these Lawes Captain William Cockburn merchant in Edinburgh, and Jean Clerk his Spouse had withdrawen and withheld Barbara Cockburne Spous to the Complainer from him, his house and Family, and keept her close in their house And when he cam eto See his own wyfe treated him with opprobrious and ignominious epithetes, Discharged him of their house, Did not allow him the Freedome of converseing with her either in publict or privat, that so he might prevaill with her to return without noise or the least reflection upon any former miscarriage Nor hes their wickedness Sisted there, But hes raised ane lybell in her name, befor the Lords of privie Councill, againest the Complainer, Mentioning That he treated that as by the consequences did appear She could not live in Saftie with him, and that he withheld assistance from her when in child birth, and away her Child She knew not whither, without allowing her ane Sight therof, And that her Mourning and walking barefooted was heard by the Servants and Neighbours with other Circumstances keeped in generall, and therfore Concluding ane Separation and aliment, Wheras it was Nottour and knowen that the Complainer intertained the said Barbara his wyffe with full conjugall love and affection in bed, and at Board, and every way suitable to his qualitie and condition in the world, To which the said Captain Cockburne and Jean Clerk were too frequently witnesses, and he cherished her, treated her suitablie to his relation, as the same with him selfe, loved her which he was not able to withhold or diminish, Notwithstanding of the provocation given by her withdrawing, and the lybell raised in her name, which he did not impute to her but to her Father, and mother, for ane seperat end of their own more then for Seperating their Daughter from him, for her Saftie, And befor the said Barbara took the pains of childbirth the Complainer suspecting they were coming on affoorded Her every thing proper, Desyred her Midwyfe and Mother might be called, and which was done even befor he could gett allowance from her for that end, and when they did not come so early as expected, he runn out himselfe in disorder forgetting his Hat, and happilym ett Mistres Hunter in the wynd who came verie Seasonablie to give her assistance befor any necessitie of ane other ignorant woman who was present her applying of herselfe, and to whose skill the Mother refused to Committ her, And the Complainer was so farr from wishing of fyre from Heaven to consume this wyfe, or any other person, that when the said Jean Clerk had been imprecating him, he had Blessed God, that She had not power to call for fyre from Heaven to consume him, And Seeing words go in the air the Utterer therof was best expositor of his own mynd And not the different apprehensions of accidentall hearers who cannot be well inclyned to the intertaineing the affection of a Conjugall Societie, when they report the expressions of anie pairtie with disadvantage, in order to make anie difference betwixt the pairties, And it was knowen that the best of Husbands and wyfes have had expressions unsuitable which they had repented of, And which good Neighbours had concealled and mitigat, wheras heire each mole was made a Mountain, And the Complainer durst Say that he had been so happie and well with his wyfe, and would be so if She were delivered from her parents, that never two lived more intire, And when She brought her child, and when the same was putt to nurseing, She gave the childs cloaths to the Nurse, with her own hands, and the child and nurse with her in the roume kissing her child befor She went away, and the nurse and child had been with her Since, And if the Complainers wyfe mourned or walked bare footed in the roume, the same had been for her own ease, or recreation, and without his giving occasion therfor, From all which it was clear that the lybell was calumnious, and that the said William Cockburne and Jean Clerk the authors of the Complainers wyffes withdrawing, are the authors therof, And therffor ought to deliver back to him his wyfe, and to be otherwayes punished for their withdrawing and withholding of his wyfe, and raiseing the forsaid calumnious, and divisive lybell, of which Crymes they were the authors actors airt or pairt, And Anent the charge given to the saids Defenders to have Compeared personallie befor the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, at ane certain day now bygone, to have answered to the forsaid Complaint, and to have heard and Seen Such order and course taken theranent as appertained With Certification, as in the said lybell and executions at more length was Contained, Which act at the instance of Barbara Cockburne, Spouse to Saintmartines, againest Master James Dallas of Stmertines With lybell at the instance of the said Mr James Dallas of Sainrmartines againest Captain William Cockburn Merchant in Edinburgh and Jean Clerk his Spous being called, And the saids Barbara Cockburne, with the Saids Captain Cockburne and Jean Clark Compearing personally at the Barr, with Sir David Dalrymple Mr Robert Fraser and Mr […] Mckenzie there advocats, and the said Mr James Dallas Compearing also personally at the barr, with Sir David Cunninghame, Mr David Forbes, and Mr George Dalrymple his advocats, and the forsaid act with the lybell being read, and both pairties and their Lawiers heard at the Barr, and removed, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, admitted the act and lybell to probation, and the witnesses being called for both pairties did make faith, The Councill Nominated and appoynted the Earle of Loudon and Leven Lord Anstruther, Phesdo, and the Provest of Edinburgh to be a Committie to examine the witnesses upon the matter represented in the said act and lybell, and the haill Circumstances aryseing there from and Recommended to the said Committie to meet to morrow at two of the acloack in the afternoon, And Declaired any three a Quorum and to report, According to which appoyntment the said Committie or their Quorum, having mett and called some of the persuers witneses, and they having Compeared and being Solemnly Sworne purged of partiall Council and malice, and examined on their great oaths, They Deponed as their Depositions extant in proces bears Therafter There being a petition given in and presented to the saids Lords by the said Mr James Dallas of Saintmartines, Shewing That where Barbara Cockburne his wyfe Complained to their Lordships of his behaviour to her, and Craved ane aliment He Still retaining his affection towards her, did not reconveen her, or Complain of her, but of her Father and Mother, as the authors of her withdrawing, and of the lybell, In which Complaint he did excuse himselfe, and that verie modestly, and that the proces Should sist, But her parents Still so prevailled with her that they had Countenanced the adduceing of probation wherin all the injuries proven through by the Single Testimonies of facile Women are verball and no servitia, or Speciall maletreatment, or withholding Suitable provision from her so much as pretended, And Seeing the matter was thus farr carried, and that he had Witnesses Cited for proving his behaviour towards his wyfe, with full kindness and Civility at bed, board, and every every2 other way proper for Husbands towards their wifes and entertained and carressed her parents till of late that her Mother abused him, in his own house, calling him Rascall, Villain, Rogue, and offered to break his face, and that in presence of his wyfe, therby to enclyne her, and prepare her to withdraw as She now had done, And therfore Craving their Lordships to allow the Witnesses Cited at his instance, for taking of the lybell at his wyfes instance to be examined, for through he forbore to Cite his wyfe in that proces from 3 good design yet that could not depryve him from adduceing witnesses for proving his good and kyndly behaviour towards ther yea even though he had not Cited them at all, if they be but present, and much more the Witnesses Cited and who had made faith, as also to allow him to interrogate the Witnesses adduced by his wyfe, upon the same and other pertinent Interrogators, And to Ordain them to attend for that effect, and in the mean tyme to delay advyseing as the said petition bears; Which petition being upon the thirtieth day of november last, read in presence of the saids Lords, and they having Considered the same, The Saids Lords allowed the Witnesses Cited for the petitioner in the proces at his instance againest Captain Cockburn and his Spous, and who Compeared at the barr and did make4 faith to be examined, upon Such Interrogators as the Committie appoynted therin Should find relevant for proveing his good and affectionat behaviour towards Barbara Cockburn his Spous, and Recommended to the said Committie to meet to morrow morning at ten acloack in the fornoon, and to receive the Witnesses accordinglie and continued the Quorum as formerly And the Said Commity not having mett, there was ane other petition given in to the saids Lords by the said Mr James Dallas of Saintmairtnes, Shewing That where their Lordships haveing appoynted a Committie formerly named by their Lordships in the affair betwixt Saintmairtnes and his wyfe to have mett and examined his witnesses adduced by him upon Such Interrogators of his, that the Lords of the Commitie Should find relevant, and accordingly he being desyrous to have the bussiness brought to ane period, Did each day Since Thursday last to this very tyme attend with his witnesses Advocats and Clerk in the Committie, that their Lordships might be pleased to meet and examine his saids witnesses some living at a Distance, and one being a nurse, so that they were unwilling each day to attend, and the saids Lords being otherwayes necessarly taken up, And therfor Craving not only might please their Lordships to Stop advyseing of the forsaid proces till the said Committie, or any others of their Lordships number, they Should please to add therto, Should meet and examine his Witnesses, But also that their Lordships would Recommend to the said Committie to meet at ane particular tyme, that he and his Saids witnesses might attend, and that their Lordships would be pleased to grant him a Dilligence againest any of his Witnesses that Should withdraw themselves willfully from the said Committie, as the said petition bears. Which petition being upon the fyfth day of December instant, read in presence of the saids Lords, and they having Considered the same, They stopped advyseing of the proces at his Ladies instance againest him, untill the Committie formerly appoynted in the said proces should meet and examine the witnesses adduced by the petitioner, and the saids Lords Recommended to the Committie to meet to morrow at ten of the cloak in the fornoone, and examine the petitioners witnesses and report, And granted to the petitioner letters of dilligence by Caption againest Such of the witnesses as Compeared at the barr, and did make faith, and therafter Should withdraw and absent themselves from the said Committie and assigned the […] day of […] nixt to Come for that effect, According to which appoyntment the said Committie or their Quorum having mett and called for Saintmairtnes his witnesses, and they having Compeared, and being Solemnly Sworne purged of partiall Councill and malice, and examined on their great oath They Deponed as their Depositions extant in proces lykewayes bears, Therafter There was ane Information given in to the saids Lords of privie Councill by the said Barbara Cockburne Spous to Mr James Dallas of Saintmartines, Bearing the said Mr Dallas of Saintmartines having about thirteen moneths agoe made ane offerr of marriage to the said Barbara Cockburn with verie Singular protestations of love and affection to her, She was induced with the consent of her parents and other Relations to imbrace the overture, believeing the man was ingenous, and that the conditions he gave in his Contract of Marriage with her, were resonable enough instances of his Sincerity, The Gentleman Saintmairtnes did indeed very early discover a very froward temper and Disposition, which broke out in a remarkable instance of ingratitude towards his Father, whom he left exposed in his old age to the extreamest hardship and distress without afforrding him any help, even after his Father had bestowed upon him all the fortune he had to promote his settlement with his first wyfe by whom he gott ane considerable estate, and again in ane other instance againest his Sister, whose back he putt a red hott burning bigg key betwixt her Stayes and her Skinn, which had almost killed her, he also used his Spous now deceased most harshly and undutifullie and had alwayes exercised a verie Tyrannical Domination over his Children, banishing them through Infants from his house, and exposed them to wander for the Smallest trifless, which things Should not indeed have been mentioned, were it not to Demonstrat to their Lordships, that the barbarous treatment the Said Barbara Cockburn received afterwards from him, did proceed from ane incorrigible Byass in Saintmairtnes Temper, which by many repeated unworthy actions, was heightned to Such a degree, as excluded all rationall hopes of his ammending, about a fourthnight after the Marriage, and as Soon as Saintmartines had carryed his wyfe to his own house, be begann to treat her, with ane unexpressible barbarity, and finding no occasion from her Submission and dutifull behaviour to him, To use her rudely, he takes up this pretence, that She was presbiterian, and was unwilling to go with him to the English Service, And therfor every week at least twice or thrise, he would thrust her out of his bedd, exposed to the cold of the winter nights, threatning that if she made anie noise, or Cry for her Relieffe, or opened the door, which he had bolted, or putt on her cloaths, he would Cutt her throat, and if any tyme She Spoke but one word, to Soften his Inhumanity, that he made ane matter of disrespect, and disobedience, telling her he would in due tyme punish her for it, the effect of which was to call her alone, when all witnesses were removed, and to threaten the taking away of her lyfe, with his hand on his Sword (which he constantly wore in the house) if She did nto prostrat herselfe befor him and upon her naked kness, asked God, and himselfe pardon, and then would must impiously requyre her upon oath utterly, and forever to renounce all conversation with her parents, and sometymes he would call to her parents, and Condescend upon some passadges of her Behaviour toward him (which indeed all men but himselfe must have judged most innocent and inoffensive) and exclaimed againest her as guiltie of the blackest Crimes, as particularly in one instance which may serve for all, viz: having first threatned her to answer upon oath, he must foolishly and impertinently inquyred of her how many Suiters She had befor him, To which She having innocently answered, and Condescended upon two or three, He then asked her again, whither She had not rather See all these men hanged, then he Should be in a fever, To which She having again Replyed, That rather then See so many innocent persons Sufferr death, She could See herselfe or him in a fever provyding he recovered, Upon which emergent, He called her parents, and exposed the answer, which he had noted down in his pocket book, as full of Disrespect, calling it a Crime worse then Murder, adulterie Witchcraft, or incest, And for which by vertue of his Authority as a Husband, he would punish her and which indeed, he did not faill to doe, Ane instance that must forever Demonstrat in Saintmartines the height of Folly, and a Temper inhuman and Tyrrannicall without example, The pursuer having Sufferred this useage with great quiet and Silence, through it was continued without any Intermission, from the first forthnight after her Marriage, till the tyme She was to be delivered of her Child, His barbarity at length broke out in ane instance, which did plainly discover, he designed really to doe what he had so often threatned, viz To Destroy her lyfe, and that too in a manner, no less extraordinary, then Cruell, by denying to her in Childbirth those helps that are so necessary to all, But especially to Women, in their first labour insomuch that She was truly, and actually brought to a Condition apparently unto human Skill irrecoverable, But it having pleased God to disappoynt the malice of her Husband, and the fears of her Friends, as Soon as She drew to the lowest degree of Strength, She beseeched her Friends to transport her to her Fathers house, and tho She was told, her weakness was Such as could not bear it, without the hazard of her lyfe, yet so strange was the Sense of that extream Slavery, She had induced, and the apprehensions of ane violent death by her Husband, that She constantly persisted in the resolution, And through She fainted by the way was at length transported as She desired, After that her Friends and Relations from a full Conviction of the truth of all that most barbarous useage, Did advyse her intenting befor their Lordships, a proces of aliment upon those most relevant grounds, viz a Cruell and Tyranicall useage, of a Husband to a wyfe, the threatning to take away, and destroy her lyfe, and the actuall denying to her, in the condition of Childbirth, these helps that were necessary for Supporting of it, The lybell has been read in their Lordships presence and admitted to probation, and the witnesses had now Deponed, and there had been also a probation adduced by Saintmartines in a way of Reconvention, for proving that he was a loving and excellent Husband, and that the whole matter might be cleared that was laid befor their Lordships in order to a Sentence, Their Lordships are intreated to Consider primo, That in all that affair Saintmartines had not the confidence to the charge the pursuer with the least Circumstance of undutifull behaviour to him, he did indeed in his Reconvention lay, that her weeping and cryeing, and walking bare footed in the night tyme, in his bed Chamber, was for her Diversion, By which he at once expressed his own folly, and established the truth of her lybell, Secundo att the first Sederunt of the Commitie appoynted for taking of the Depositions, Saintmartines being asked by one of the Honorable Members of the said Committie, if he would not rather condescend voluntarly to give ane aliment, then Sufferr, what might be the issue of that matter after probation He yeilded to ane aliment of Sic hundered merks, and there having been a write drawen up to be Subscrybed by him, at the Second meeting of the Committie, which write did import a confession of the treatment and useage he had given to the persuer, He after reading and hearing of the said write read to him, Did Solemnly and judicially acquiesce in it, in presence of the Committie But being afterwards puffed up with the hopes of his own probation he was to lead, did most disingenously retract, And in presence of the whole Committie, did deney he had ever acquiesced, on which that reflection might be verie justly made, that as nothing but a Conviction of guilt, could ever have made any man acquiesce to ane write, that loaded him So much, So nothing, but the most impudent disingenuity could have made a man deney he had made ane acquiescence, which was truly so publickly and solemnly made, Tertio Whilst one of the witnesses adduced for the pursuer was Deponing Saintmartines was pleased to Interrupt the Lord Examinator, desireing him to Interrogat his wyfe there present if ever he had done or said any thing undutifull to her about the tyme of her being brought to bed, (that being the only tyme he thought any probation could reach him) and the persuer haveing modestly continued Silent, He constrained the Lord Examinator to repeat the Question And as She was about to answer he stopped her still She was putt upon her oath, which being done, She Answered with tears, that the wound which the Child received in its head at the birth, was occasioned by his holding her on a hard Stool per force, And that the fourth day after She was brought to bed, and almost in ane expyreing Condition, he threatned to Cutt her throat, so that here was a probation againest him of his own chooseing, and extored by his own folly Quarto It was indeed impossible that all the instances and Circumstances of a Treatment of that kynd could fall under probation by witnesses, there being seldom or never any other witnesses to actions of that kynd than the authors of them, who industriously affect Secrecy and close doors for such barbarous executions, however it was plain from the Depositions of Anna Steven, Margaret Russell, and Issobell Buy Servants to Saintmairtines, that they frequently heard his Lady weeping and crying with closs doors, and that they frequently heard Saintmartines speak to her in passion and wrath, and the pursuer wishing that She had born her Child, that She might go to Service And that Saintmartines wished he were a prophet to the end that he might destroy his wyfe, her parents, and her whole Relations by fyre from Heaven, And that her crying in the night tyme had made them say among themselves, Sure he was now Murdering her, He endeavoured to practise the said Margaret Russell and counsell her befor Deponing, And that Saintmartines said if he were not afraid of ane aliment to his wyfe he would turn her out of doors, and bidd her go be Damned, And it was evident from the Depositions of Mistress Hunters and Doctor Ecclesses Lady, that althrough She had been in labour from Ten of the Cloack at night, till betwixt eight and nyne the nixt morning, When her Mother and these two Deponents came to her, and found her in a most deplorable Condition, She had no help or assistance, but barbarous useage alreadie mentioned in her own Deposition, and it was most evident from the expression that Stmartines had to Doctor Ecclesses Lady, and which was repeated in her Deposition, he did not design that She Should have had any, And to conclude these reflections on the probation for the persuer, It was impossible to think that a Woman who by the whole tenor of her lyfe had given verie good prooff of her Innocence, Modesty, and good Nature, could expose herselfe to be pointed out as ane unfortunate Creature, and to be the subject of common discourse to the world, by leaving of her Husband (especially when She runn the hazard of her lyfe in doing so) unless She had been therto Constrained by ane useage that was unsupportable, The Defences made for Saintmartines by his Reconvention are primo, That it was of ill consequence to allow of a wyfes leaving her Husband, or to incouradge it, as being contrary to both divine and Humane lawes, as being contrary to both divine and Humane lawes, Secundo He was a most loving and kind Husband, To which it was answered for the persuer, Primo, That the example of a wyfes leaving ther Husband was indeed very rare, (especially a wyfe whose innocence and virtue, neither Saintmartines nor malice itselfe could stain) because it was verie rare that such men, or rather such Monsters as Saintmartines could be found, and the consequence of protecting their innocence when oppressed in the maner abovementioned, was so farr from being ill, that its absolutely necessary, and the same Lawes both humane and Divine, which did indeed verie Strictly tye a wyfe, to abyde with her Husband, did dispence with her continuing under a Slavery and fears unsupportable to humane nature Secundo, as to the defence of his being a loving Husband and the probation adduced for it, there was nothing deserved notice in either, but both were ridiculous, for primo, Any man but Saintmartines in Such a case as that would have defended himselfe by Saying that these hardships he had done to his wyfe were but the effects of passion to which he was perhaps lyable more then ordinary by his naturall Temper, But instead of that to pretend he was a most loving and excellent Husband, was foolish and ridiculous, and as to the probation he had adduced for it, viz: The Depositions of Marjory Fife, and Jannet Weatherspoons, The said Marjory Fyfe Deponed that She was a Servant but three dayes in his house befor his wyfe was brought to bed, And notwithstanding, She Deponed that he was alwayes a loving Husband, And that She thought his making to meikle of his wyfe made her daft, and Jannet Weatherspoons Deponed in the same words by which it was evident, first that they were both instructed, and practised by Saintmairtines, as he had indeavoured to practise Anna Stieven, And nixt that no man on earth could have Instructed two Witnesses to Depone in the Same foolish and ridiculous words, but he who with his own hand could insert in the Reconvention, that his wifes weeping and walking barefooted through his roome manie nights in the cold winter Season, was for her pleasure and divertisement, And furder to make appear the practiseing of the said Marjory Fyffe, He instructed her to Depone She went from mistres Forbes the midwyfe by his order, about Six acloack in the morning (who sent her Sister because She could not Come) And that She heard Saintmartines Daughter say, that the pursuers mother would not allow Mistres Forbes Sister to touch the persuer when She came, All which matters of fact, if the same had been true, could have been more fairly proven by the Deposition of Mistres Forbes and her Sister, witnesses beyond exception then by his own present, But the truth is he knew well that Mistres Forbes Sister could Depone, that instead of Six acloack, that the Servant came not to her house till a little before eight, And that instead of Mistres Cockburns hindering, that he himselfe actually refused her to touch his wyfe, Wherfore It was hoped their Lordships would be pleased to Decern the Defender in ane Aliment for his wyfes Subsistance, with regaird to the great expences was bestowed upon her, by her parents to physicians being in Such a week condition, when She fledd out of her Husbands Family, And in carrying on this proces, as also to return her parapharnalia, As the said Information bears, As also there was ane other Information given in to the saids Lords by the said Mr James Dallas of Saintmartines, Bearing Master James Dallas of Saintmartines married Elizabeth Riddel Daughter to Walker Riddell of Minto, by whom She gott ane considerable fortune, And which to this hour is the farr greatest pairt of his estate, And had by her eleven Chidlren, wherof Four marriagebale, His marriage with her continued twentie years taking on moneth in full peace, and conjugall affection, without the least noise or Complaint of either, After this Ladyes death for pure love without any To her He married Barbara Cockburne Daughter to William Cockburn Merchant, who had a Child to him within three Quarters or therby of the year to the Marriage, and who lived very well together, untill She was much withdrawen by her mother, with whom She was frequently, yea two pairts more then her whole tyme, And often came home ill pleased at the letter. C:A: which Saintmartines still dissembled, and diverted with affectionat expressions and excuses of what appeared wrong in her, by which means he assurred himselfe to make ane affectionat and dutifull wyfe of her, and cherished her accordingly, And entertained her well Suitable to his qualitie and Condition, so that there was neither Severitie used towards her, nor could She complain of want, A forthnight after her child birth her Mother carried her away to her house, And when Saintmartines went to her there to take her back to her own, He is received by her Mother with the ignominious Epithets of Rogue, Rascall, (Marjory Fyfe A: b.) and the like which She was even pleased to repeat befor the Committie of the privie Councill and he was not allowed to converse with her alone but as a Stranger in Company, and so did not prevaill with her to return, but She being So much under the Influence and awe of her mother, She prevailled with her to raise ane lybell befor the privie Councill against Saintmartines, mentioning of the rigid Carriage towards her, And that He withheld assistance from her, when in childbirth, and that he payed for fire from Heaven to destroy her and Relations, and that he putt away her child from her without her knowledge, or telling her whither the Child was, and that She was often heard to mourn, weep; and walked bare footed, And that by these and other Circumstances She was in danger of her lyfe, and could not live in Safetie with him, And therfor Craved Seperation and aliment, For proving of this lybell, Mistres Hunter the Midwyfe Deponed that the Lady had gotten cold befor She came, and Doctor Eccles Lady Deponed that Saintmartines offered her a glass of cold Claret, there being no Sinamon water in the house, which the midwyfe would not allow her to take, And the Ladyes Mother having asked Saintmartines whey they were Not sooner sent for, He said to her, that if the forespring had not brocken, they had been all yet to send for which is all that arises from the probation, with relation to the first Article, Now as to this, let every Man judge where was Saintmartines fault, for the Lybell was that he withheld Assistance from his wyfe when in Childbirth, as to which there was nothing proven, no not the least tendencie therto And on the contart, Marjory Fyfe Servant in the house for the tyme, Depones at the letter, That Saintmartines Suspecting his wyfe to have taken her pains, Implored his wyfe in the name of (Jesus Christ) that She would let him know where the midwife lived, that She might be Sent for And that accordingly the same Deponenet went for the Midwyfe at Six acloack in the morning, and another for the Ladies Mother, and accordingly de facto, She had help the midwyfe and Mother being both present at the Birth, Its true Mistres Hunter Deponed that the Lady had gott cold, but does not say that Saintmartines was the occasion of it cold in Sick persons and especially in Childbirth, aryseing more frequently from want of good Government then want of fire, and especially upon the twentie nynth of August this year, which was the childs birthday, And when the Lady would not Suffer the fire to be putt on early in the morning, when Stmartins desired it, as the said Marjory Fyfe Deponed A:d. and as for other women In the like case, they use tymeously to provyde themselves with what is suitable for them and the child, there being many things at that period unproper for mens knowledge, and all married men are obtested whether they Committ that charge to their wyfe and Women about them, or take it upon themselves And for Saintmartines he did more in that then was usuall by A.e. Imploring his wyfe to know where her Midwife lived by Sending for her and her Mother by Imbraceing the Midwyfe in his Arm’s when She came, And intreating her to haste in to his wyfe, for She was much wanted, as appears by the same Deposition, and by heating he drinks with his own hand, as appears by Moflinties Deposition B.d. And as to that pairt of Doctor Eccles Ladies oath, where She Depones that if the forespring had not broke, they had been all yet to send for but doth not condescend who hindred the sending for them, and Saintmartimes Denyed that expression and did believe the Lady had mistaken his words And the intention of his Discourse to her, for all he could remember he exprest or Discoursed was that it was his wifes own fault, they were not Sooner Sent for, and that appeared from the Testimonie adduced for Saintmartines, that he desired his wyfe two or three hours befor they came A.e. for the Lord Jesus Christs Sake tell where the Midwyfe lived And mistres Eccles Testimony being but Single, no Law, nor reason can allow it to inferr Inhumanity in Saintmartines, especially when the Sense therof cleared by the Deposition of ane other witness, who Deponed positively, that he desired his Lady A.e. for the Lord Jesus sake to tell where her Midwyfe stayed, and which Deponent was Sent for, her Midwyfe Mistres Forbes by Six in the morning, three hours befor Mrs Eccles comeing, and this did further appear from to be all the import of that expression, upon which Mistres Eccles Deponed, from the sweet of the other Testimonies, Declairing that Saintmartines lived kyndly with his Lady, and that day was officiously kynd to her, by warming of drinks, and furnishing her with necessars, And its firmly hoped the Lords will in a case of this importance narrowly notice the probation, and have no respect to Mistres Eccles Testimony, And therfore he takes more pains to insist upon this poynt, because he would not have the least Suspition to remain with their Lordships of any Such he could be guilty of, in thought far less in deed, in withholding help from his Lady any maner of way whose love to, and care of his wyfe, was evident by A.f. Marjory Fyfe, B:g. Agnes Mcflintie, C.h, Janet Wootherspoons proven, And as to his offerring a glass of cold claret, that can suffer no bad Sense, he knowing no better, And A.J. and C.k. proves his having allowed all provisions proper it was his wyfes fault in not getting them, and that he allowed all provision was clear by the said Marjory Fyffes deposition and Janet Weotherspoons, The Second poynt in the lybell was, that Saintmartines prayed for fire from Heaven to destroy his Lady and her Relations, and as to which Margaret Russell alone Deponed, so that She was Single, and not to be believed, and only of eighteen years of age, Secundo she exculpats Saintmartines for She Depones that ex incontinenti, he saw her mistake, and the witness might mistake his word, And therfore he explained what was his thought that he thanked God, that his wifes mother had not power to call for fire out of Heaven to destroy him, which was the true expression mistaken by the woman, The nixt poynt was, that without her knowledge he putt away her Child, and She knew not whither as to which, there was not the least probation, and his wifes knowledge of the Childs going away, and whether, was proven by A.l. Marjory Fyfe, B: M. Agnes McFlintie, E: N. Janet Ross who all concurr in this, that his wyfe gave the child, and childs claoths to the Nurse, and that even since his wife withdrew, the Child and Nurse has been with her all night, The fourth poynt was that She was heard weeping and walk barefooted, as to that, her being heard to weep appeared proven, but of her walking barefooted not one word proven then as to the murmuring or weeping what can that import, Seeing none of them Depones that Saintmartines was the occasion therof, and if at ane accidentall tyme from her youth and pettitness She had mistaken his expression, and had weeped or mourned, what could that inferr, but at the most that She was somewhat grieved, or rather pettit, and it appears to be the last, from the Depositions of Marjory Fyfe, and Janet Wetherspoons who deponed that Saintmartines by making too much of his Lady A. O. and C. P. had made her daft, And Anna Steven, who Deponed fully in favours of his wyfe was that just to Saintmartines that she sayes in her Deposition that She never saw any ill usage D.q. from Saintmartines towards his Lady, And through She Saw her weep She knew not the reason therof, D: r, Through there be nothing more in the lybell, Anna Steven and Isobell Bowie, Depone that the Lady Saintmartines expressed herselfe, that if she were sufferred to bear her Child, She would go to Service, and the same woman Depone, that they Saw no ill useage by Saintmartines towards his Lady D: q. so this being his wyfes own expression can inferr nothing againest him, he having given no provocation therto, and it was not enough that said Bowie Depones, that Saintmartines said at the tyme to the Lady go and be Damned, the doors and window’s are opened, Primo, Because She was a Single Witness, and Secondly if the Ladie expressed herselfe to her Husband, that She would go to Service and leave him, it would have provoked any calm man to have made that return, but in charity both expressions Should be looked upon as repented of as soon as made, and Saintmartines as he denyes the expression on his pairt, so he gives a demonstration of the contrar, in desyreing her home to him who did so much love her, as was proven by the Said Testimonies, and in manie good Families unsuitable and unproper expressions have fallen out betwixt man and wyfe, which were never brought to publick, but were thought proper to be buried in perpetuall oblivion, From all which, and the conjugall affection betwixt man and wyfe, and Saintmartines tender care of his wyfe, and good provision for her, And that nothing of atrositie, Servitia, or withholding maintenance, or any thing harsh can be pretended or proven, and that the lybell was raised and pusued by her parents without imputing to herselfe altogether, ought to be throwen out, and his wife to return to her Husband, and her parents to be punished as the authors of it, As the said Information lykewayes bears, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having this day proceeded to advyse the mutuall processes betwixt Mr James Dallas of Saintmartins, and Barbara Cockburn his Spous, and the act by way of Lybell, at the instance of the said Barbara Cockburn againest the said Mr James Dallas, with the lybell at the instance of the said Mr James Dallas againest Captain William Cockburn Merchant in Edinburgh, and […] Clark his Spous, with answers to the Ladies Lybell, Depositions of the Witnesses adduced by both pairties, And Informations hinc inde being all read in presence of the Saids Lords, And they having Considered the samen The Saids Lords of Her Majesties privie Councill have Granted and heirby Grants to the said Barbara Cockburne the soume of Six Hundered merks Scots money yearly to be payed by the said Mr James Dallas, to the said Barbara Cockburn for ane aliment to herselfe and Child to be payed att two termes in the year Whitsonday and Mertimess be equall portions, Beginning the first termes payment therof immediatly for the terme of Mertimess last by past, and suae furth yearly and termly therafter And have appoynted and Ordained, and heirby Appoynts and Ordain’s the said Mr James Dallas of Saintmartines to make payment therof accordingly, And to restore to the Said Margaret Cockburne her parapharnalia, Conforme to ane Inventar therof to be signed under her hand, And Ordaines letters of horning under the Signet of Councill upon six dayes to be direct heirupon as effeirs.

Edinburgh 12th December 1704

D1704/12/41

Decreet

Decreit Barbara Cockburne Lady Saintmartines against her Husband

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by Barbara Cockburne spous to the Laird of Saintmartines Humbly Shewing, That where the petitioner was married to James Dallas of Saintmartines upon the […] day of […] who verie shortly after their marriadge begann to treat the petitioner with extream rigour and unkyndness, which Nevertheless She Supported with all dutifull Submission and patience, and would have continued to the last moment of her lyfe to doe so, if her said Husband his inclemencie and hard useage had not broke out so openly, and in ane instance which did visiblie threaten the petitioners lyfe, and in such a maner as excluded all hopes of living in anie peace or saftie, with him heirafter, she did therfore humbly represent her distrest condition in the following Circumstances, and primo albeit the petitioners said husband was so conscious as to avoyd these things openly which might affoord a legall ground of Separation, yet she was not able to express the bitterness she mett with in secret, and which she could no otherwayes prove then by adduceing the Servants in the house, and these in the neighbourhood to witness the mournings which have been heard in the roume where the petitioner was shutt up with her husband and that she had been heard to walk barefooted diverse nights in that mourning condition, Secundo after a tract of severities, and when She came to be delivered of her Chyld she offered to prove by the neighbourhood and Servants in her Family that She continued to cry out in labour from ten at night to seven the nixt morning without having any help or assistance called, And then when a midwyfe was sent for, who was accidentally out of the way, and could not attend her selfe She sent another skilled woman to assist the petitioner, yet that woman was not suffered to give her any help, and unless it had been from the help which she received in her uttermost extremitie from another, the petitioners mother sent for she most have then perished with her Chyld, Tertio when her husband was quarrelled for so great a Cruelty he made frivolous and unsatisfactorie pretences, implyeing that this treatment had been studied, and to compleat all wished he had power to bring fyre from Heaven to consume the petitioner, and her Friends, Quarto, after so dangerous and hard useage She was deprived of the pleasure of Seeing her Infant, which was carried out of the house some few dayes after it was born, without somuch as ever letting her See it, or telling her whither it was Convoyed, Quinto by these hard useages the petitioner was brought to the danger of her lyfe which She offerred to prove, There were many other important circumstances which no doubt would concurr to Satisfie the Saids Lords of the necessitie of Separation, and which She was readie alse to prove, But these She only mentioned in generall out of the decent respect which She had to her husband, and most humblie beseeched their Lordships to believe that nothing could have made her to expose her misfortune and affliction in a Complaint of that nature, But a setled belieffe deryved from the sadd experience she had of her Husbands utter aversion to her, and that if any opposition were made by him to a Separation, it was not out of affection, and would inevitablie end in the petitioners ruine, And therfor Craving that it might have pleased the saids Lords to have granted warrand to have Cited the said James Dallas of Saintmartines the petitioners husband to Compear befor their Lordships, and to hear the forsaid circumstances particularly and generally abovementioned proven, and being proven to modifie her ane aliment as the said petition bears, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition given in to them by Barbara Cockburne Spouse to Saintmairtines, and the samen being Read in their presence, The saids Lords granted warrant to Meacers of privie Councill, or Messengers at arm’s to Cite the said James Dallas of Saintmairtnes the petitioners Husband to Compear befor the Saids Lords the fourteenth day of November instant to hear and See the Circumstances particularly and generally Contained in the above petition proven, And for that effect Granted warrant to the saids meacers or messengers to Cite Such witnesses as the petitioner Shall condescend, or for proving the matter Contained in the forsaid above petition to appear befor the saids Lords day and place forsaid and bear leall and Soothfast witnessing in Sua farras they know, or Shall be Speired at them in the forsaid matter, And Anent the charge given to the said James Dallas of Saintmartines to have Compeared befor the Saids Lords of privie Councill, in the terms of and with Certification conforme to the said acts as the samen more fully bears. And alse Anent the letters or lybell raised befor the saids Lords of privie Councill at the instance of Master James Dallas eldest lawfull son to George Dallas of Saintmartines, with concourse of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat for her highness interest, Makeing Mention That albeit by the Lawes of this and all Civilized nations the conjugall affection and Societie betwixt man and wife was to be incouradged, and if mistakes and misapprehensions fell out all good Christians are to divert them, and concurr to their removall, so that the affection betwixt man and wyfe might remain suitable to the relation, and not to instigate the one against the other, or to withdraw the wyfe from the Husband therby to alienat her affection, and in her name to raise Scandalous and opprobrious lybells against her Husband, in order to procure ane aliment, wherby to maintaine the authors of the division, Yet Nevertheless and without regaird to these Lawes Captain William Cockburn merchant in Edinburgh, and Jean Clerk his Spouse had withdrawen and withheld Barbara Cockburne Spous to the Complainer from him, his house and Family, and keept her close in their house And when he cam eto See his own wyfe treated him with opprobrious and ignominious epithetes, Discharged him of their house, Did not allow him the Freedome of converseing with her either in publict or privat, that so he might prevaill with her to return without noise or the least reflection upon any former miscarriage Nor hes their wickedness Sisted there, But hes raised ane lybell in her name, befor the Lords of privie Councill, againest the Complainer, Mentioning That he treated that as by the consequences did appear She could not live in Saftie with him, and that he withheld assistance from her when in child birth, and away her Child She knew not whither, without allowing her ane Sight therof, And that her Mourning and walking barefooted was heard by the Servants and Neighbours with other Circumstances keeped in generall, and therfore Concluding ane Separation and aliment, Wheras it was Nottour and knowen that the Complainer intertained the said Barbara his wyffe with full conjugall love and affection in bed, and at Board, and every way suitable to his qualitie and condition in the world, To which the said Captain Cockburne and Jean Clerk were too frequently witnesses, and he cherished her, treated her suitablie to his relation, as the same with him selfe, loved her which he was not able to withhold or diminish, Notwithstanding of the provocation given by her withdrawing, and the lybell raised in her name, which he did not impute to her but to her Father, and mother, for ane seperat end of their own more then for Seperating their Daughter from him, for her Saftie, And befor the said Barbara took the pains of childbirth the Complainer suspecting they were coming on affoorded Her every thing proper, Desyred her Midwyfe and Mother might be called, and which was done even befor he could gett allowance from her for that end, and when they did not come so early as expected, he runn out himselfe in disorder forgetting his Hat, and happilym ett Mistres Hunter in the wynd who came verie Seasonablie to give her assistance befor any necessitie of ane other ignorant woman who was present her applying of herselfe, and to whose skill the Mother refused to Committ her, And the Complainer was so farr from wishing of fyre from Heaven to consume this wyfe, or any other person, that when the said Jean Clerk had been imprecating him, he had Blessed God, that She had not power to call for fyre from Heaven to consume him, And Seeing words go in the air the Utterer therof was best expositor of his own mynd And not the different apprehensions of accidentall hearers who cannot be well inclyned to the intertaineing the affection of a Conjugall Societie, when they report the expressions of anie pairtie with disadvantage, in order to make anie difference betwixt the pairties, And it was knowen that the best of Husbands and wyfes have had expressions unsuitable which they had repented of, And which good Neighbours had concealled and mitigat, wheras heire each mole was made a Mountain, And the Complainer durst Say that he had been so happie and well with his wyfe, and would be so if She were delivered from her parents, that never two lived more intire, And when She brought her child, and when the same was putt to nurseing, She gave the childs cloaths to the Nurse, with her own hands, and the child and nurse with her in the roume kissing her child befor She went away, and the nurse and child had been with her Since, And if the Complainers wyfe mourned or walked bare footed in the roume, the same had been for her own ease, or recreation, and without his giving occasion therfor, From all which it was clear that the lybell was calumnious, and that the said William Cockburne and Jean Clerk the authors of the Complainers wyffes withdrawing, are the authors therof, And therffor ought to deliver back to him his wyfe, and to be otherwayes punished for their withdrawing and withholding of his wyfe, and raiseing the forsaid calumnious, and divisive lybell, of which Crymes they were the authors actors airt or pairt, And Anent the charge given to the saids Defenders to have Compeared personallie befor the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, at ane certain day now bygone, to have answered to the forsaid Complaint, and to have heard and Seen Such order and course taken theranent as appertained With Certification, as in the said lybell and executions at more length was Contained, Which act at the instance of Barbara Cockburne, Spouse to Saintmartines, againest Master James Dallas of Stmertines With lybell at the instance of the said Mr James Dallas of Sainrmartines againest Captain William Cockburn Merchant in Edinburgh and Jean Clerk his Spous being called, And the saids Barbara Cockburne, with the Saids Captain Cockburne and Jean Clark Compearing personally at the Barr, with Sir David Dalrymple Mr Robert Fraser and Mr […] Mckenzie there advocats, and the said Mr James Dallas Compearing also personally at the barr, with Sir David Cunninghame, Mr David Forbes, and Mr George Dalrymple his advocats, and the forsaid act with the lybell being read, and both pairties and their Lawiers heard at the Barr, and removed, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, admitted the act and lybell to probation, and the witnesses being called for both pairties did make faith, The Councill Nominated and appoynted the Earle of Loudon and Leven Lord Anstruther, Phesdo, and the Provest of Edinburgh to be a Committie to examine the witnesses upon the matter represented in the said act and lybell, and the haill Circumstances aryseing there from and Recommended to the said Committie to meet to morrow at two of the acloack in the afternoon, And Declaired any three a Quorum and to report, According to which appoyntment the said Committie or their Quorum, having mett and called some of the persuers witneses, and they having Compeared and being Solemnly Sworne purged of partiall Council and malice, and examined on their great oaths, They Deponed as their Depositions extant in proces bears Therafter There being a petition given in and presented to the saids Lords by the said Mr James Dallas of Saintmartines, Shewing That where Barbara Cockburne his wyfe Complained to their Lordships of his behaviour to her, and Craved ane aliment He Still retaining his affection towards her, did not reconveen her, or Complain of her, but of her Father and Mother, as the authors of her withdrawing, and of the lybell, In which Complaint he did excuse himselfe, and that verie modestly, and that the proces Should sist, But her parents Still so prevailled with her that they had Countenanced the adduceing of probation wherin all the injuries proven through by the Single Testimonies of facile Women are verball and no servitia, or Speciall maletreatment, or withholding Suitable provision from her so much as pretended, And Seeing the matter was thus farr carried, and that he had Witnesses Cited for proving his behaviour towards his wyfe, with full kindness and Civility at bed, board, and every every2 other way proper for Husbands towards their wifes and entertained and carressed her parents till of late that her Mother abused him, in his own house, calling him Rascall, Villain, Rogue, and offered to break his face, and that in presence of his wyfe, therby to enclyne her, and prepare her to withdraw as She now had done, And therfore Craving their Lordships to allow the Witnesses Cited at his instance, for taking of the lybell at his wyfes instance to be examined, for through he forbore to Cite his wyfe in that proces from 3 good design yet that could not depryve him from adduceing witnesses for proving his good and kyndly behaviour towards ther yea even though he had not Cited them at all, if they be but present, and much more the Witnesses Cited and who had made faith, as also to allow him to interrogate the Witnesses adduced by his wyfe, upon the same and other pertinent Interrogators, And to Ordain them to attend for that effect, and in the mean tyme to delay advyseing as the said petition bears; Which petition being upon the thirtieth day of november last, read in presence of the saids Lords, and they having Considered the same, The Saids Lords allowed the Witnesses Cited for the petitioner in the proces at his instance againest Captain Cockburn and his Spous, and who Compeared at the barr and did make4 faith to be examined, upon Such Interrogators as the Committie appoynted therin Should find relevant for proveing his good and affectionat behaviour towards Barbara Cockburn his Spous, and Recommended to the said Committie to meet to morrow morning at ten acloack in the fornoon, and to receive the Witnesses accordinglie and continued the Quorum as formerly And the Said Commity not having mett, there was ane other petition given in to the saids Lords by the said Mr James Dallas of Saintmairtnes, Shewing That where their Lordships haveing appoynted a Committie formerly named by their Lordships in the affair betwixt Saintmairtnes and his wyfe to have mett and examined his witnesses adduced by him upon Such Interrogators of his, that the Lords of the Commitie Should find relevant, and accordingly he being desyrous to have the bussiness brought to ane period, Did each day Since Thursday last to this very tyme attend with his witnesses Advocats and Clerk in the Committie, that their Lordships might be pleased to meet and examine his saids witnesses some living at a Distance, and one being a nurse, so that they were unwilling each day to attend, and the saids Lords being otherwayes necessarly taken up, And therfor Craving not only might please their Lordships to Stop advyseing of the forsaid proces till the said Committie, or any others of their Lordships number, they Should please to add therto, Should meet and examine his Witnesses, But also that their Lordships would Recommend to the said Committie to meet at ane particular tyme, that he and his Saids witnesses might attend, and that their Lordships would be pleased to grant him a Dilligence againest any of his Witnesses that Should withdraw themselves willfully from the said Committie, as the said petition bears. Which petition being upon the fyfth day of December instant, read in presence of the saids Lords, and they having Considered the same, They stopped advyseing of the proces at his Ladies instance againest him, untill the Committie formerly appoynted in the said proces should meet and examine the witnesses adduced by the petitioner, and the saids Lords Recommended to the Committie to meet to morrow at ten of the cloak in the fornoone, and examine the petitioners witnesses and report, And granted to the petitioner letters of dilligence by Caption againest Such of the witnesses as Compeared at the barr, and did make faith, and therafter Should withdraw and absent themselves from the said Committie and assigned the […] day of […] nixt to Come for that effect, According to which appoyntment the said Committie or their Quorum having mett and called for Saintmairtnes his witnesses, and they having Compeared, and being Solemnly Sworne purged of partiall Councill and malice, and examined on their great oath They Deponed as their Depositions extant in proces lykewayes bears, Therafter There was ane Information given in to the saids Lords of privie Councill by the said Barbara Cockburne Spous to Mr James Dallas of Saintmartines, Bearing the said Mr Dallas of Saintmartines having about thirteen moneths agoe made ane offerr of marriage to the said Barbara Cockburn with verie Singular protestations of love and affection to her, She was induced with the consent of her parents and other Relations to imbrace the overture, believeing the man was ingenous, and that the conditions he gave in his Contract of Marriage with her, were resonable enough instances of his Sincerity, The Gentleman Saintmairtnes did indeed very early discover a very froward temper and Disposition, which broke out in a remarkable instance of ingratitude towards his Father, whom he left exposed in his old age to the extreamest hardship and distress without afforrding him any help, even after his Father had bestowed upon him all the fortune he had to promote his settlement with his first wyfe by whom he gott ane considerable estate, and again in ane other instance againest his Sister, whose back he putt a red hott burning bigg key betwixt her Stayes and her Skinn, which had almost killed her, he also used his Spous now deceased most harshly and undutifullie and had alwayes exercised a verie Tyrannical Domination over his Children, banishing them through Infants from his house, and exposed them to wander for the Smallest trifless, which things Should not indeed have been mentioned, were it not to Demonstrat to their Lordships, that the barbarous treatment the Said Barbara Cockburn received afterwards from him, did proceed from ane incorrigible Byass in Saintmairtnes Temper, which by many repeated unworthy actions, was heightned to Such a degree, as excluded all rationall hopes of his ammending, about a fourthnight after the Marriage, and as Soon as Saintmartines had carryed his wyfe to his own house, be begann to treat her, with ane unexpressible barbarity, and finding no occasion from her Submission and dutifull behaviour to him, To use her rudely, he takes up this pretence, that She was presbiterian, and was unwilling to go with him to the English Service, And therfor every week at least twice or thrise, he would thrust her out of his bedd, exposed to the cold of the winter nights, threatning that if she made anie noise, or Cry for her Relieffe, or opened the door, which he had bolted, or putt on her cloaths, he would Cutt her throat, and if any tyme She Spoke but one word, to Soften his Inhumanity, that he made ane matter of disrespect, and disobedience, telling her he would in due tyme punish her for it, the effect of which was to call her alone, when all witnesses were removed, and to threaten the taking away of her lyfe, with his hand on his Sword (which he constantly wore in the house) if She did nto prostrat herselfe befor him and upon her naked kness, asked God, and himselfe pardon, and then would must impiously requyre her upon oath utterly, and forever to renounce all conversation with her parents, and sometymes he would call to her parents, and Condescend upon some passadges of her Behaviour toward him (which indeed all men but himselfe must have judged most innocent and inoffensive) and exclaimed againest her as guiltie of the blackest Crimes, as particularly in one instance which may serve for all, viz: having first threatned her to answer upon oath, he must foolishly and impertinently inquyred of her how many Suiters She had befor him, To which She having innocently answered, and Condescended upon two or three, He then asked her again, whither She had not rather See all these men hanged, then he Should be in a fever, To which She having again Replyed, That rather then See so many innocent persons Sufferr death, She could See herselfe or him in a fever provyding he recovered, Upon which emergent, He called her parents, and exposed the answer, which he had noted down in his pocket book, as full of Disrespect, calling it a Crime worse then Murder, adulterie Witchcraft, or incest, And for which by vertue of his Authority as a Husband, he would punish her and which indeed, he did not faill to doe, Ane instance that must forever Demonstrat in Saintmartines the height of Folly, and a Temper inhuman and Tyrrannicall without example, The pursuer having Sufferred this useage with great quiet and Silence, through it was continued without any Intermission, from the first forthnight after her Marriage, till the tyme She was to be delivered of her Child, His barbarity at length broke out in ane instance, which did plainly discover, he designed really to doe what he had so often threatned, viz To Destroy her lyfe, and that too in a manner, no less extraordinary, then Cruell, by denying to her in Childbirth those helps that are so necessary to all, But especially to Women, in their first labour insomuch that She was truly, and actually brought to a Condition apparently unto human Skill irrecoverable, But it having pleased God to disappoynt the malice of her Husband, and the fears of her Friends, as Soon as She drew to the lowest degree of Strength, She beseeched her Friends to transport her to her Fathers house, and tho She was told, her weakness was Such as could not bear it, without the hazard of her lyfe, yet so strange was the Sense of that extream Slavery, She had induced, and the apprehensions of ane violent death by her Husband, that She constantly persisted in the resolution, And through She fainted by the way was at length transported as She desired, After that her Friends and Relations from a full Conviction of the truth of all that most barbarous useage, Did advyse her intenting befor their Lordships, a proces of aliment upon those most relevant grounds, viz a Cruell and Tyranicall useage, of a Husband to a wyfe, the threatning to take away, and destroy her lyfe, and the actuall denying to her, in the condition of Childbirth, these helps that were necessary for Supporting of it, The lybell has been read in their Lordships presence and admitted to probation, and the witnesses had now Deponed, and there had been also a probation adduced by Saintmartines in a way of Reconvention, for proving that he was a loving and excellent Husband, and that the whole matter might be cleared that was laid befor their Lordships in order to a Sentence, Their Lordships are intreated to Consider primo, That in all that affair Saintmartines had not the confidence to the charge the pursuer with the least Circumstance of undutifull behaviour to him, he did indeed in his Reconvention lay, that her weeping and cryeing, and walking bare footed in the night tyme, in his bed Chamber, was for her Diversion, By which he at once expressed his own folly, and established the truth of her lybell, Secundo att the first Sederunt of the Commitie appoynted for taking of the Depositions, Saintmartines being asked by one of the Honorable Members of the said Committie, if he would not rather condescend voluntarly to give ane aliment, then Sufferr, what might be the issue of that matter after probation He yeilded to ane aliment of Sic hundered merks, and there having been a write drawen up to be Subscrybed by him, at the Second meeting of the Committie, which write did import a confession of the treatment and useage he had given to the persuer, He after reading and hearing of the said write read to him, Did Solemnly and judicially acquiesce in it, in presence of the Committie But being afterwards puffed up with the hopes of his own probation he was to lead, did most disingenously retract, And in presence of the whole Committie, did deney he had ever acquiesced, on which that reflection might be verie justly made, that as nothing but a Conviction of guilt, could ever have made any man acquiesce to ane write, that loaded him So much, So nothing, but the most impudent disingenuity could have made a man deney he had made ane acquiescence, which was truly so publickly and solemnly made, Tertio Whilst one of the witnesses adduced for the pursuer was Deponing Saintmartines was pleased to Interrupt the Lord Examinator, desireing him to Interrogat his wyfe there present if ever he had done or said any thing undutifull to her about the tyme of her being brought to bed, (that being the only tyme he thought any probation could reach him) and the persuer haveing modestly continued Silent, He constrained the Lord Examinator to repeat the Question And as She was about to answer he stopped her still She was putt upon her oath, which being done, She Answered with tears, that the wound which the Child received in its head at the birth, was occasioned by his holding her on a hard Stool per force, And that the fourth day after She was brought to bed, and almost in ane expyreing Condition, he threatned to Cutt her throat, so that here was a probation againest him of his own chooseing, and extored by his own folly Quarto It was indeed impossible that all the instances and Circumstances of a Treatment of that kynd could fall under probation by witnesses, there being seldom or never any other witnesses to actions of that kynd than the authors of them, who industriously affect Secrecy and close doors for such barbarous executions, however it was plain from the Depositions of Anna Steven, Margaret Russell, and Issobell Buy Servants to Saintmairtines, that they frequently heard his Lady weeping and crying with closs doors, and that they frequently heard Saintmartines speak to her in passion and wrath, and the pursuer wishing that She had born her Child, that She might go to Service And that Saintmartines wished he were a prophet to the end that he might destroy his wyfe, her parents, and her whole Relations by fyre from Heaven, And that her crying in the night tyme had made them say among themselves, Sure he was now Murdering her, He endeavoured to practise the said Margaret Russell and counsell her befor Deponing, And that Saintmartines said if he were not afraid of ane aliment to his wyfe he would turn her out of doors, and bidd her go be Damned, And it was evident from the Depositions of Mistress Hunters and Doctor Ecclesses Lady, that althrough She had been in labour from Ten of the Cloack at night, till betwixt eight and nyne the nixt morning, When her Mother and these two Deponents came to her, and found her in a most deplorable Condition, She had no help or assistance, but barbarous useage alreadie mentioned in her own Deposition, and it was most evident from the expression that Stmartines had to Doctor Ecclesses Lady, and which was repeated in her Deposition, he did not design that She Should have had any, And to conclude these reflections on the probation for the persuer, It was impossible to think that a Woman who by the whole tenor of her lyfe had given verie good prooff of her Innocence, Modesty, and good Nature, could expose herselfe to be pointed out as ane unfortunate Creature, and to be the subject of common discourse to the world, by leaving of her Husband (especially when She runn the hazard of her lyfe in doing so) unless She had been therto Constrained by ane useage that was unsupportable, The Defences made for Saintmartines by his Reconvention are primo, That it was of ill consequence to allow of a wyfes leaving her Husband, or to incouradge it, as being contrary to both divine and Humane lawes, as being contrary to both divine and Humane lawes, Secundo He was a most loving and kind Husband, To which it was answered for the persuer, Primo, That the example of a wyfes leaving ther Husband was indeed very rare, (especially a wyfe whose innocence and virtue, neither Saintmartines nor malice itselfe could stain) because it was verie rare that such men, or rather such Monsters as Saintmartines could be found, and the consequence of protecting their innocence when oppressed in the maner abovementioned, was so farr from being ill, that its absolutely necessary, and the same Lawes both humane and Divine, which did indeed verie Strictly tye a wyfe, to abyde with her Husband, did dispence with her continuing under a Slavery and fears unsupportable to humane nature Secundo, as to the defence of his being a loving Husband and the probation adduced for it, there was nothing deserved notice in either, but both were ridiculous, for primo, Any man but Saintmartines in Such a case as that would have defended himselfe by Saying that these hardships he had done to his wyfe were but the effects of passion to which he was perhaps lyable more then ordinary by his naturall Temper, But instead of that to pretend he was a most loving and excellent Husband, was foolish and ridiculous, and as to the probation he had adduced for it, viz: The Depositions of Marjory Fife, and Jannet Weatherspoons, The said Marjory Fyfe Deponed that She was a Servant but three dayes in his house befor his wyfe was brought to bed, And notwithstanding, She Deponed that he was alwayes a loving Husband, And that She thought his making to meikle of his wyfe made her daft, and Jannet Weatherspoons Deponed in the same words by which it was evident, first that they were both instructed, and practised by Saintmairtines, as he had indeavoured to practise Anna Stieven, And nixt that no man on earth could have Instructed two Witnesses to Depone in the Same foolish and ridiculous words, but he who with his own hand could insert in the Reconvention, that his wifes weeping and walking barefooted through his roome manie nights in the cold winter Season, was for her pleasure and divertisement, And furder to make appear the practiseing of the said Marjory Fyffe, He instructed her to Depone She went from mistres Forbes the midwyfe by his order, about Six acloack in the morning (who sent her Sister because She could not Come) And that She heard Saintmartines Daughter say, that the pursuers mother would not allow Mistres Forbes Sister to touch the persuer when She came, All which matters of fact, if the same had been true, could have been more fairly proven by the Deposition of Mistres Forbes and her Sister, witnesses beyond exception then by his own present, But the truth is he knew well that Mistres Forbes Sister could Depone, that instead of Six acloack, that the Servant came not to her house till a little before eight, And that instead of Mistres Cockburns hindering, that he himselfe actually refused her to touch his wyfe, Wherfore It was hoped their Lordships would be pleased to Decern the Defender in ane Aliment for his wyfes Subsistance, with regaird to the great expences was bestowed upon her, by her parents to physicians being in Such a week condition, when She fledd out of her Husbands Family, And in carrying on this proces, as also to return her parapharnalia, As the said Information bears, As also there was ane other Information given in to the saids Lords by the said Mr James Dallas of Saintmartines, Bearing Master James Dallas of Saintmartines married Elizabeth Riddel Daughter to Walker Riddell of Minto, by whom She gott ane considerable fortune, And which to this hour is the farr greatest pairt of his estate, And had by her eleven Chidlren, wherof Four marriagebale, His marriage with her continued twentie years taking on moneth in full peace, and conjugall affection, without the least noise or Complaint of either, After this Ladyes death for pure love without any To her He married Barbara Cockburne Daughter to William Cockburn Merchant, who had a Child to him within three Quarters or therby of the year to the Marriage, and who lived very well together, untill She was much withdrawen by her mother, with whom She was frequently, yea two pairts more then her whole tyme, And often came home ill pleased at the letter. C:A: which Saintmartines still dissembled, and diverted with affectionat expressions and excuses of what appeared wrong in her, by which means he assurred himselfe to make ane affectionat and dutifull wyfe of her, and cherished her accordingly, And entertained her well Suitable to his qualitie and Condition, so that there was neither Severitie used towards her, nor could She complain of want, A forthnight after her child birth her Mother carried her away to her house, And when Saintmartines went to her there to take her back to her own, He is received by her Mother with the ignominious Epithets of Rogue, Rascall, (Marjory Fyfe A: b.) and the like which She was even pleased to repeat befor the Committie of the privie Councill and he was not allowed to converse with her alone but as a Stranger in Company, and so did not prevaill with her to return, but She being So much under the Influence and awe of her mother, She prevailled with her to raise ane lybell befor the privie Councill against Saintmartines, mentioning of the rigid Carriage towards her, And that He withheld assistance from her, when in childbirth, and that he payed for fire from Heaven to destroy her and Relations, and that he putt away her child from her without her knowledge, or telling her whither the Child was, and that She was often heard to mourn, weep; and walked bare footed, And that by these and other Circumstances She was in danger of her lyfe, and could not live in Safetie with him, And therfor Craved Seperation and aliment, For proving of this lybell, Mistres Hunter the Midwyfe Deponed that the Lady had gotten cold befor She came, and Doctor Eccles Lady Deponed that Saintmartines offered her a glass of cold Claret, there being no Sinamon water in the house, which the midwyfe would not allow her to take, And the Ladyes Mother having asked Saintmartines whey they were Not sooner sent for, He said to her, that if the forespring had not brocken, they had been all yet to send for which is all that arises from the probation, with relation to the first Article, Now as to this, let every Man judge where was Saintmartines fault, for the Lybell was that he withheld Assistance from his wyfe when in Childbirth, as to which there was nothing proven, no not the least tendencie therto And on the contart, Marjory Fyfe Servant in the house for the tyme, Depones at the letter, That Saintmartines Suspecting his wyfe to have taken her pains, Implored his wyfe in the name of (Jesus Christ) that She would let him know where the midwife lived, that She might be Sent for And that accordingly the same Deponenet went for the Midwyfe at Six acloack in the morning, and another for the Ladies Mother, and accordingly de facto, She had help the midwyfe and Mother being both present at the Birth, Its true Mistres Hunter Deponed that the Lady had gott cold, but does not say that Saintmartines was the occasion of it cold in Sick persons and especially in Childbirth, aryseing more frequently from want of good Government then want of fire, and especially upon the twentie nynth of August this year, which was the childs birthday, And when the Lady would not Suffer the fire to be putt on early in the morning, when Stmartins desired it, as the said Marjory Fyfe Deponed A:d. and as for other women In the like case, they use tymeously to provyde themselves with what is suitable for them and the child, there being many things at that period unproper for mens knowledge, and all married men are obtested whether they Committ that charge to their wyfe and Women about them, or take it upon themselves And for Saintmartines he did more in that then was usuall by A.e. Imploring his wyfe to know where her Midwife lived by Sending for her and her Mother by Imbraceing the Midwyfe in his Arm’s when She came, And intreating her to haste in to his wyfe, for She was much wanted, as appears by the same Deposition, and by heating he drinks with his own hand, as appears by Moflinties Deposition B.d. And as to that pairt of Doctor Eccles Ladies oath, where She Depones that if the forespring had not broke, they had been all yet to send for but doth not condescend who hindred the sending for them, and Saintmartimes Denyed that expression and did believe the Lady had mistaken his words And the intention of his Discourse to her, for all he could remember he exprest or Discoursed was that it was his wifes own fault, they were not Sooner Sent for, and that appeared from the Testimonie adduced for Saintmartines, that he desired his wyfe two or three hours befor they came A.e. for the Lord Jesus Christs Sake tell where the Midwyfe lived And mistres Eccles Testimony being but Single, no Law, nor reason can allow it to inferr Inhumanity in Saintmartines, especially when the Sense therof cleared by the Deposition of ane other witness, who Deponed positively, that he desired his Lady A.e. for the Lord Jesus sake to tell where her Midwyfe stayed, and which Deponent was Sent for, her Midwyfe Mistres Forbes by Six in the morning, three hours befor Mrs Eccles comeing, and this did further appear from to be all the import of that expression, upon which Mistres Eccles Deponed, from the sweet of the other Testimonies, Declairing that Saintmartines lived kyndly with his Lady, and that day was officiously kynd to her, by warming of drinks, and furnishing her with necessars, And its firmly hoped the Lords will in a case of this importance narrowly notice the probation, and have no respect to Mistres Eccles Testimony, And therfore he takes more pains to insist upon this poynt, because he would not have the least Suspition to remain with their Lordships of any Such he could be guilty of, in thought far less in deed, in withholding help from his Lady any maner of way whose love to, and care of his wyfe, was evident by A.f. Marjory Fyfe, B:g. Agnes Mcflintie, C.h, Janet Wootherspoons proven, And as to his offerring a glass of cold claret, that can suffer no bad Sense, he knowing no better, And A.J. and C.k. proves his having allowed all provisions proper it was his wyfes fault in not getting them, and that he allowed all provision was clear by the said Marjory Fyffes deposition and Janet Weotherspoons, The Second poynt in the lybell was, that Saintmartines prayed for fire from Heaven to destroy his Lady and her Relations, and as to which Margaret Russell alone Deponed, so that She was Single, and not to be believed, and only of eighteen years of age, Secundo she exculpats Saintmartines for She Depones that ex incontinenti, he saw her mistake, and the witness might mistake his word, And therfore he explained what was his thought that he thanked God, that his wifes mother had not power to call for fire out of Heaven to destroy him, which was the true expression mistaken by the woman, The nixt poynt was, that without her knowledge he putt away her Child, and She knew not whither as to which, there was not the least probation, and his wifes knowledge of the Childs going away, and whether, was proven by A.l. Marjory Fyfe, B: M. Agnes McFlintie, E: N. Janet Ross who all concurr in this, that his wyfe gave the child, and childs claoths to the Nurse, and that even since his wife withdrew, the Child and Nurse has been with her all night, The fourth poynt was that She was heard weeping and walk barefooted, as to that, her being heard to weep appeared proven, but of her walking barefooted not one word proven then as to the murmuring or weeping what can that import, Seeing none of them Depones that Saintmartines was the occasion therof, and if at ane accidentall tyme from her youth and pettitness She had mistaken his expression, and had weeped or mourned, what could that inferr, but at the most that She was somewhat grieved, or rather pettit, and it appears to be the last, from the Depositions of Marjory Fyfe, and Janet Wetherspoons who deponed that Saintmartines by making too much of his Lady A. O. and C. P. had made her daft, And Anna Steven, who Deponed fully in favours of his wyfe was that just to Saintmartines that she sayes in her Deposition that She never saw any ill usage D.q. from Saintmartines towards his Lady, And through She Saw her weep She knew not the reason therof, D: r, Through there be nothing more in the lybell, Anna Steven and Isobell Bowie, Depone that the Lady Saintmartines expressed herselfe, that if she were sufferred to bear her Child, She would go to Service, and the same woman Depone, that they Saw no ill useage by Saintmartines towards his Lady D: q. so this being his wyfes own expression can inferr nothing againest him, he having given no provocation therto, and it was not enough that said Bowie Depones, that Saintmartines said at the tyme to the Lady go and be Damned, the doors and window’s are opened, Primo, Because She was a Single Witness, and Secondly if the Ladie expressed herselfe to her Husband, that She would go to Service and leave him, it would have provoked any calm man to have made that return, but in charity both expressions Should be looked upon as repented of as soon as made, and Saintmartines as he denyes the expression on his pairt, so he gives a demonstration of the contrar, in desyreing her home to him who did so much love her, as was proven by the Said Testimonies, and in manie good Families unsuitable and unproper expressions have fallen out betwixt man and wyfe, which were never brought to publick, but were thought proper to be buried in perpetuall oblivion, From all which, and the conjugall affection betwixt man and wyfe, and Saintmartines tender care of his wyfe, and good provision for her, And that nothing of atrositie, Servitia, or withholding maintenance, or any thing harsh can be pretended or proven, and that the lybell was raised and pusued by her parents without imputing to herselfe altogether, ought to be throwen out, and his wife to return to her Husband, and her parents to be punished as the authors of it, As the said Information lykewayes bears, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having this day proceeded to advyse the mutuall processes betwixt Mr James Dallas of Saintmartins, and Barbara Cockburn his Spous, and the act by way of Lybell, at the instance of the said Barbara Cockburn againest the said Mr James Dallas, with the lybell at the instance of the said Mr James Dallas againest Captain William Cockburn Merchant in Edinburgh, and […] Clark his Spous, with answers to the Ladies Lybell, Depositions of the Witnesses adduced by both pairties, And Informations hinc inde being all read in presence of the Saids Lords, And they having Considered the samen The Saids Lords of Her Majesties privie Councill have Granted and heirby Grants to the said Barbara Cockburne the soume of Six Hundered merks Scots money yearly to be payed by the said Mr James Dallas, to the said Barbara Cockburn for ane aliment to herselfe and Child to be payed att two termes in the year Whitsonday and Mertimess be equall portions, Beginning the first termes payment therof immediatly for the terme of Mertimess last by past, and suae furth yearly and termly therafter And have appoynted and Ordained, and heirby Appoynts and Ordain’s the said Mr James Dallas of Saintmartines to make payment therof accordingly, And to restore to the Said Margaret Cockburne her parapharnalia, Conforme to ane Inventar therof to be signed under her hand, And Ordaines letters of horning under the Signet of Councill upon six dayes to be direct heirupon as effeirs.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 327v-337v.

2. Sic.

3. An ink blot at this point, obscuring a word.

4. The word ‘make’ is an insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 327v-337v.

2. Sic.

3. An ink blot at this point, obscuring a word.

4. The word ‘make’ is an insertion.

Sederunt, 12 December 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh 12th December 17041

D1704/12/32

Sederunt

Lord Chancelour; Marquis of Annandale P:; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Loudon; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Balcarres; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Earl of Ruglen; Earl of Hopetoun; Lord President of Session; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Arnistoun; Lord Halcraig; Lord Anstruther; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fra: Montgomery; Laird of Blackuder; Laird of Ormistoun younger; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Edinburgh 12th December 17041

D1704/12/32

Sederunt

Lord Chancelour; Marquis of Annandale P:; Earl of Crafurd; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Loudon; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Balcarres; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Earl of Ruglen; Earl of Hopetoun; Lord President of Session; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Arnistoun; Lord Halcraig; Lord Anstruther; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fra: Montgomery; Laird of Blackuder; Laird of Ormistoun younger; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/28, 327v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 321v-327v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 327v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 321v-327v.

Act, 5 December 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh 5th December 1704

D1704/12/21

Act

Act for liberating Mr John Grieve furth of the Tolbuith of Selkirk

Annent the principall lybell or letters of Complaint raised and persued befor the Lords of her Majesties privy Councill, at the instance of Mr John Grieve of Pinacle with concourse of Sir James Steuart her Majesties Advocat for her highness interest in the matter underwritten Makeing mention That where by the Lawes of this and all well governed Nations the Seaseing of the Leidges, and depryveing them of their liberty without any warrand or authority of ane Judge, especially when the same was done by armed force, and with Cruelty against persons of age, And by ane invasion within our Kingdome of England, and the using of privat prisons are all Crymes of ane high nature, and Severly punishable, Yet Nevertheless it was of verity that Walter Scott late of Tushielaw, John Tout his Tennent […] Walter Scott merchant ther, Thomas MacDougall of Stodrigge and his Servant, William Purdie, Servitor to the Laird of Langlands, William Barrie Servant to […] William Loram Servant to Todrigg James […] Messenger in Kelso, James Scott Servant to Whitslade, Patrick Chisime Servant to Gledstones, at Sweat gairdner at Martine did upon the nynteenth day of November last Jaj vic and two years goe into England, being to the number of ten or twelve armed with Gunns Carrobines, Swords, Pistolls and therat or about the villadge of Cornhill Sorround and Sease the said Mr John Grieve Complainer a man of Sixtie three years of age, and he having indeavoured to throw himselfe of his horse, and Struggled for his liberty The Saids Defenders or ane or other of them did impiously and barbarously call out God damn him, murder the Day or words of the like import, and having forced him along through the Town and hawghs of Cornwall, and brought him through Tweed, the said Defenders carryed him to Kelso, where he was kept in a private house prisoner, untill ane Messenger and a Caption for a pretended debt was gott, and then they carryed the said Complainer to the Tolbuith of Selkirk, where he was Shutt up in a roume having Four windows with great iron grates without glass, or Shutters, and deprived of bed or other necessars, in the cold winter Season, therby making use of the Shaddow of Law, to continue what had been begun by unjust force and violence, and which was executed with the utmost Crueltie and severtie by all which the said Walter Scott and his accomplices abovenamed or ane or other of them, are guilty airt and pairt of the Crymes abovelybelled, and ought to be Decerned to repair the said Mr John Grieve of his Damnadges, Lykeas the said Mr John Grieve ought to be Sett at Libertie, and the said Walter Scott, and his accomplices punished in their persons and goods according to the demerite of the Cryme, to the Terror of others to Committ the like in tymecomeing, And Anent The charge given to the Saids Defenders to have Compeared personally2 befor the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, at ane certain day now bygone to have answered to the grounds of the forsaid Complaint, and to have heard and seen such order and Course taken theranent, as the saids Lords Should find just, as the said lybell or letters of Complaint, with the executions therof at more length proports, And alse Anent the letters or lybell of Reconvention also raised and persued befor the Lords of privie Councill at the instance of the saids Walter Scott of Tushielaw, John Tait his Tennent, […] Hude late of Hardlaw, now in Kelso, Walter Scott merchant there Thomas MacDougall of Stodrigg and […] his Servant, William Purdie Servant to the Laird of Langlands, William Barrie Servitor to Whitslade William Loran Servitor to Todrigg […] Brown Messenger at Kelso, James Scott Servitor to Whitslade Patrick Chisholme Servitor to Glaidstanes, and […] Sweat Gardiner at Mairtoun, with Concurse of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat, for her highness interest in the matter underwritten, That where by the Lawes of this and all well governed Nations, the raiseing of groundless and malicious persuits and accusations to the vexation of the Subjects, especially by persons not only Rebells and Fugitives from the Law, and who therby deserve not the protection therof, But throw manifest defraud and cheating of their Creditors withdraw their persons and effects into other Kingdomes, to Shunn the execution of the Law and payment of their just debts And not only lybelling falsehoods, But lykewayes complaining of persons, who were not so much as present or Concerned in deeds alleadged to have been committed and therby troubleing and vexing them, and obliedging them to withdraw them from their Bussiness and imployment, To attend malicious and groundless Complaints to their great charge and expensses are Crymes of ane high nature, and deserve Severly to be punished, as also by the Fyfth act of the Sixth Session of the first parliament of King William all persons guiltie of Defrauding Creditors are to be Declaired infamus infamia juris, And to be otherwayes punished, Yet Nevertheless Master John Grieve late of Pinacle albeit he was Denounced Rebell and Caption taken out against him, for not obedience given to ane Decreit of the Lords of our Councill and Session upon ane gross malversation of Trust, at the instance of the said Walter Scott one of the Complainers, and did withdraw his person and effects out of the Kingdome to the defrauding of just Creditors, Yet being incarcerat in Selkirk Tolbuith did presume Still to carry on his villanie, and had raised a malicious Complaint and Lybell, without all ground of Law, alleadging that he was illegally carried by force out of England by the saids Complainers, Wheras it was certain he was not only Rebell Fugitive from Law, and had withdrawen his effects out of the Kingdome to the defraud of the Creditors, But lykewayes lying under Caption, and ane warrand issued out by the Sherriffe of Roxburgh Shyre for apprehending him, And in the circumstance he was in, was in the case of a Debitor Fugitious, as also that the like had been practised by the English upon Scotsmen in the Scots Syde particularly by the Toun of Berwick who at their own hands Seized upon ane Tennent or Servant of the Laird of Lambertouns, and carried him prisoner out of his ground, as also attempted to doe the same upon a Scots man within the Toun of Caldstream and severall other instances, And furder it could be proven that the haill Complainers abovementioned (except he the said Walter Scott of Tushelaw) were alibi at the tyme of of3 his apprehension, Wherethrorow it was evident how malicious and groundless the said persuite was againest all Law, And therfore the said Mr John Grieve late of Pinacle ought not only to be Decerned in the Soume of […] as Damnadges and charges Sustained by the Complainers, But otherwayes punished in his person, and goods, as the Lords of the privie Councill should think fitt. And Anent The Charge given to the said Defender to have Compeared personallie befor the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill at ane certain day bygone, To have heard and seen Such order and course taken theranent, as in the saids letters of Reconvention at more length is Contained, Which Lybells principall and Reconvention being upon the twentie Second day of June last bypast called in presence of the saids Lords, and the said persuer in the principall lybell who is Defender in the Reconvention Compearing at the Barr by Sir David Dalrymple his Advocat, and the Defenders in the principall lybell who are persuers in the Reconvention Compearing also at the Barr by Sir Walter Pringle, and Master William Scott Advocats forsaids for the Saids Defenders in the principall lybell gave in the answers therto following, Makeing Mention That the lybell bears that the Complainer was violently seized upon the english Syde by Walter Scott, and the other Defenders, and by them brought to the Toun of Kelso, where he was detained in ane privat house till ane Messenger and Caption was gott for ane pretended debt, and thence carried to Selkirk prison, where he hes indured much through the badness of the prison, and coldness of the winter, And therfore concludes that he ought to be Sett at liberty, his Damnadges refounded, and the Defenders otherwayes punished, It was answered, primo, That esto the Complainer could prove his lybell yet the Same was not competent befor the privy Councill, nor will their Lordships think fitt to trouble themselves with the cognisance of ane affair, that appears properly cognoscible befor the Lords of Session Insofarras the lybell acknowledges the Complainers imprisonment in Selkirk, by vertue of ane Caption upon ane pretended debt, And the truth was the ground of the Caption was ane Decreit obtained befor the Lords at Walter Scotts instance against the Complainer upon ane gross malversation, and denyall of ane exuberant Trust, nottour to the whole Countrey, and found by the Lords nomine contradicente, so that the Seasing of the Complainer, being after Caption was taken out, the legality or illegality therof is only competent to the Lords of Session, who properly cognosces in the execution of their own Decreits and Sentences. Secundo Esto the Lords of Councill Should take cognisance of the matter befor themselves yet the lybell is nowayes relevant for primo, albeit it were true that he was seized in the english Syde, yet being ane Scotsman rebell, and Fugitive from the Law, and withall haveing withdrawen his effects out of Scotland, to the Defraud of the forsaid Decreit of trust (ane additionall Crime to the Malverse) and therby being under such Circumstances as Law in its forme could not have execution againest him, what hinders whey the pairties interested and prejudged may not where they could, sease upon such ane Fugitive, apprehend and detaine him till Law take its force, This being plainly a Case of necessity, and the pairtie Complaining being primus in reatu, by a most gross malverse and breach of faith, and by abstracting his person and goods out of the Jurisdiction, so as that he did first withdraw himselfe from the execution of the Law of his own Countrey, he is in pessima fide now to pretend to the protection of that Law he withdrew himselfe from, And the case with the Defender Walter Scot was Such that it was impossible for him to have execution against the Complainer in England, for the Decreits of our Courts have no face there, neither could he have Secured his person, nor affected his goods by vertue therof, And all Lawiers did acknowledge, that in Such cases of necessity, where the execution of the Law cannot take place by publick authority the ordinar rules and forms might be 4 Common Law is express Tit: quei in frandem Creditorum, that in excussione Debitoris fugitivi a Creditor might propria authoritate, arreist, seise, upon persons or goods, and apply the Same for his own payment, Nor does there appear any difference betwixt this and the apprehending of a Thiefe, who by the dayly Customes of the borders, may be followed in to both Nations and apprehended, The Substracting and carrying of of5 the effects to defraud just Creditors being no less Crime, yea by the Custome of a very polite Neighbouring Nation this is alse Severely punished as either theft or robbery, And by the fyfth Act Sixth Session of his late Majesties parliament, Such are Declaired infamous, Infamia juris, and otherwayes punishable, But Secundo, any ground of Complaint that could be in this case would seem to be competent only to the neighbouring nation as being ane Incroachment upon their Jurisdiction But Seeing there was no lybell, or Complaint, at their instance, it Seemes to be altogether incompetent to the Complainer, who was lying under Caption, and was her Majesties rebell, and So has not personam Standi in judicio, and cannot be allowed, to prosecute any accusation or have the benefite of Law, till he be relaxed, But esto he had the concurse of the other Nation, they could not be heard, and which the Defenders make use of as a seperat defence, Because they offerr to prove, this has been the practise of the English, and especially the Toun of Berwick, who did Some years agoe send a pairtie out of their Town, and apprehended a Tennent or Servant of the Laird of Lambertouns in Scots ground, and carried him prisoner, to Berwick who did all this for a civill debt, which was Still the more gross, that the person, apprehended by them was a Scotsman against whom they might have had good Law, and ready execution befor any Judicature in Scotland, Wheras the present case was only the bringing back a Scotsman, fugitive from the Law of his own Countrey And another instance of the like nature pratised by the Toun of Berwick in the Toun of Coldstream which tho it did not Succeed (the person having absconded) yet their sending ane pairty and Searching upon the Scots Syde was offerred to be proven, which was enough to verifie the practise, And of all the Borders the Toun of Berwick deserves least to be countenanced by the Scots, Their debarring Scotsmen from the Freedome of their Town, and being prentises therin was knowen to their Lordships, as also there disaffection to the Scots upon all occasions, Tertio Tushelaw has produced in the Clerks hands, ane order from the Sherriffe of Roxburgh Shire, be vertue wherof the Complainer was apprehended and detained in Kelso till he was Committed to Selkirk Tolbuith, by vertue of a Caption also produced, As to the other Circumstances of the lybell anent the condition of his prison and his own Circumstances they are of no moment The Magistrats of the place are answerable for their prison, and if he pay his debt, or find Caution he Shall be freed from that inconveniency at Tushielaw’s hand, It was likewise answered separatim for John Tait Tennent to Walter Scot […] Hudlate of Hurdlaw now in Kelso, Walter Scot merchant there, Thomas MacDougall of Stodrigg and […] his Servant, William Purdie Servitor to the Laird of Langlands, William Barnie Servitor to Whitslade, William Lorwn Servitor to Todrigg […] Brown messenger in Kelso, James Scott Servitor to Whitslade, Patrick Chisolme Servitor to Gladstanes, and […] Sweet Gairdner at Martine, that they were most maliciously complained upon, not being upon the place that day, nor Concerned in the alleadged apprehension for which and the other reasons abovementioned, there are6 letters of Reconvention and exculpation raised, as the saids answers bears, And the said Sir David Dalrymple Advocat for the persuer of the principall lybell who is Defender in the Reconvention, Gave in the answers following to the Said lybell of Reconvention, bearing Pinacle having Complained to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill against Tushielaw, as being guilty of a ryot against the Law of Nations, and the particular Lawes of this Kingdome, insofar as Tushielaw did Seise the said Pinacle without the authority of any Judge, by open force in the Kingdome of England and brought him over the border, which was contrary to the Law of Nations, and the good correspondence betwixt the Two Kingdomes, And this unjust violence being Committed upon the said Mr John Grieve, he has undenyable interest to Complain, But in the nixt place Tushielaw did not only violate the Law of Nations, by Seiseing Pinacle in maner above mentioned, but he did also manifestly violate the Lawes of this Kingdome having kept him in a privat prison twentie four hours befor a Caption could be found to give collour to these violencies, Tushielaw for taking of this complaint did first give in ane injurious petition, And the Lords of the privie Councill having thought fitt that Pinacle Should insist by way of libell, Tushielaw has raised a Reconvention, alleadging in Substance that the said Master John Grieve was unworthy of the protection of the Law, having first defrauded the said Tushielaw, and afterwards fled from the execution of the Law, and that he was in the case of a Doctor taken in fuga, And for clearing this alleadgance there is a Story told of a Trust, which Tushielaw reposed in Pinacle and which Pinacle denyed, But was Nevertheless Sustained by a Solemn Decreit of the Lords of Session And this Reconvention is Stufft with the terms of cheats and villanies, which are not only injurious to Pinacle but disrespectfull as he conceives to the most honorable privie Councill, Seeing Such Scurrillous lybells do noway Suite with the dignity of the privie Councill, To this injurious and Scurrillous lybell Pinacle makes the following answers, Primo, The Reconvention contains no relevant defences, for Supposeing the thing to be true, as they are alleadged, yet by no Law could the Defender seise the pursuer into a forreign Countrey, and take upon him sibi jus dicere, nor he could he retain him without Authoritie prisoner heire, And the pretence that he was rebell and unworthie the protection of the Law, was a meer conceit, for a Denounciation for a Civill debt, was no Such rebellion as the Defender pretends to imagine, nor was it left to him by his privat authoritie to determine, who was worthy of the protection of Laws or Government, And having determined put to his hands to execute, and whatever indulgence Tushielaw might promise himselfe upon his fair Stones, Yet Pinacle the persuer was confident, their Lordships would be farr from giving Countenance to so open a violation of Law, and liberty, Secundo It was no less frivolous to pretend that the persuer being a Deoctor might be taken in fuga for it could never be said, that Pinacle was taken in fuga, being taken in the Countrey where he resided Severall years, and even in these cases, if it be possible to have the authority of a Magistrat, they ought not to have proceeded without it, Tertio, Wheras the Reconvention insinuats, that the like has been practised in the Town of Berwick by Scots men upon the Border, It was answered, for anything the persuer knows, the instances were calumniously alleadged, Secundo They were not so manie as to ammount to the prooff of a Custome, nor indeed this a case, where Custome could establish any right, being against the Law of Nations, and againest peace and Order, that one Dominion Should incroach upon another, But Tertio These instances are not at all paralell to the persuer, unless it were alleadged that these incroachments being complained of, justice had been denyed; But this Argument was turly ane Aggravation of the injury complained of The Defender having the confidence to justifie and Sett up a maner of reprisealls contrary to Law and good Order, And that in a lybell offered to the privy Councill Quarto, Wheras the Defender insinuats, that he had the warrand of the Shirreff, It was answered, primo That it was Scarsely Supposeable that a Sherriffe would have interposed a warrand in this case, to take pairtie resideing in England requires at least a more emminent Authoritie, and was no matter of ordinary Jurisdiction, And Esto the Sherriffe could give order where a Caption was competent, and in the power of the pairty obtainer of the order, yet there having preceeded ane undenyable violence againest Law to make way for the execution of the Order, the obtainer of it could have no benefite by it, And the whole was but a Contryvance fraudem legi facere, nor does the Story of ane Order from the Sherriffe of Teviotdale answer the case, for the persewer was Seised at Cornwall, and brought prisoner to Caldstream which is in Berwick Shire Quinto as the Reconvention was truly irrelevant, so was it likewise contrary to the Defenders, and proves the persuers lybell7 against Tushielaw, insofar as the Reconvention pretends, that the other Defenders were alibi, except Tushielaw, Ergo a contrario Sensu, Tushielaw was present, and indeed the Lords may perceive by the Reconvention that the fact was owned and justified, and therfore this, if ever any case did, require redress to prevent the like in tymecomeing, Lastly it remains to clear the calumnies, which Tushielaw so boldly advances, as the merits of his cause, But Tushielaw knows very well, that it was impossible that the matter could be ledd in full light befor the privie Councill, however this much was certain that if Tushielaw would acknowledge the Truth, He could not but acknowledge that he was many years intertained in the persuers Family, And that after Tushielaw had might the right to the Pinacle, which he Since quarrelled upon the head of trust, Pinacle did conveen Tushelaw and his friends at Ashkirkmilne wherof some are yet alive, and offerred to Denude of Tushielaw’s estate if he or his Friends thought the purchase which he had made was too easie But there was not a Friend which Tushielaw had did quarrell it, or would interpose for him And although Pinacle has not been so carefull in the way of Securing himselfe, which has given occasion to the Decreit of Session against him, Yet Tushielaw must be Satisfied in his own Conscience that the Transaction was fair. But if the telling of a Story were sufficient to take of materiall crimes and ryots objected, Pinacle might inform, and could prove to their Lordships, if it were competent that the debt wherupon the Caption was founded againest him, was the product of a very nottorious abuse, for the Disposition of Tushielaws lands being Declared a Trust, and Pinacle appoynted to Compt, Pinacle did produce instructions to the value of Thirtie thousand pounds in ane Submission to arbiters who are yet alive and to take these instructions out of the way, Tushielaw did Seduce Pinacles eldest son ane unhappie young man to take up his Fathers writes from his agents relict, and for want of these writes was Pinacle Decerned, and was now under Caption, And that their Lordships might be Satisfied, that this was no story, Pinacles sons receipt wherin Tushielaw was a Subscrybeing witnes to David Morisons relict was produced, bearing a receipt of some particular papers expressly with these words; Together with severall other papers, which were given to the said David Morisone, by Master John Grieve of Pinacle his Father and him, when he was imployed ane agent for them, and it was well knowen that this son of Pinacles was ane profligat unhappy young8 man, and having ended with Tushielaw to the ruine of his Fathers Family went abroad as a Single Soldier, nor did this receipt come to Pinacles hands, till within this Forthnight, and as a convincing Materiall evidence that Tushielane att bottom was Satisfied the debt was unjust, Their Lordships would be informed, that for this debt he had used Inhibitions and arreistments Wherby he might have recovered all, or the farr greatest pairt of the debt, yet he discharged the Inhibition and the Cautioners in the arreistment, who were beyond exception good reserving to himselfe no other Security, but the gratfull pleasure of distressing pinacles person, and was it to be Supposed, that if there had been ane just claime for so great a Summ Tushelaw who was so vigorous, and uses Such injustifiable violence againest pinacle would had been so moderate, in the use of his other Securities, But the truth was the occasion of all this, was the Defenders malice, which has transported him beyond all bounds, Seeing therfore the lybell was undoubtedly relevant, and was not so much as denyed, but on the contrary rather acknowledged, Pinacle was confident their Lordships will Ordain him to be restored to his full liberty, and to the place where he was Seised, and punish the Said Walter Scot, according to the demerit of the Crime as the said answers also bears, And the said principall lybell and answers therto with the lybell of Reconvention and answers forsaid being read in presence of the saids Lords, And pairties Lawiers fullie heard and removed The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill upon the said twentie Second day of June last, Granted to the persuer in the principall lybell letters of second dilligence, by Caption againest Such of the witnesses as lived in the Scots Syde, and Granted full power warrand and Commission to […] With power to them to choise there own Clerk for whom they Should be answerable to take and receive the oaths and Depositions of Such famous witnesses living in the english syde as Should be adduced befor them by the said Master John Grieve, for proveing the principall lybell, And that att […] the […] dayes of July nixt to Come, or ane or other of the saids dayes, And whatever the saids witnesses Should happen to Depone in the said matter Ordained the saids Commissioners, and there said Clerk to putt the samen authentickly in write Subscrybed with ther hands, and to move and cause Such of the saids witnesses as could write Subscrybe the Samen also, And therafter to close seall and deliver the samen to the said persuer of the principall lybell, or any in his name having his order, To whom and his saids procurators, The Lords Assigned, and heirby Assignes the […] day of […] for produceing befor them this present Commission and report therof duly Subscrybed and sealled as said is, to the effect they might proceed to administer justice in the said matter, And Declaired the said Commission to be Granted cum onere expensarum maximarum to Scott of Tushelaw in case the persuer prove in the termes of the principall lybell, And Repelled the haill Deforces proponed for the Defenders in the principall lybell And Assoilzied the persuar therof from the lybell of Reconvention, And in the mean tyme Nominated and appoynted the Marquess of Annandale Lord President of the Privie Councill, The Lord Advocat and Lord Justice Clerk to be a Committie to endeavour to aggree pairties, And to report nixt Councill day and Recommended to the said Committie to meet to morrow at twelve acloack in the fornoon, and Declaired any Two a quorum, Therafter There being a petition given in and presented to the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by Robert Scott and Andrew Wauch present Baillies of the Burgh of Selkirk Humbly Shewing That where Sometyme agoe Master John Grieve late of Pinacle was brought to Selkirk, And there by vertue of ane Caption at the instance of Walter Scot of Tushielaw against him, was delivered over to them as present Baillies of the said Burgh, in order to be Committed prisoner in their Tolbuith therin to remain ay and while payment and Satisfaction Should be made by the Said Master John Grieve to the said Walter Scott of the Soume contained in the Caption, And they having in obedience to the said Caption Committed him to prison where he hitherto his Continued, they thought fitt to inform their Lordships that Sometyme therafter the said Master John Grieve was arreisted in by Andrew Riddell of Haining and Severall other persons for payment of great Soumes of money, And Pinacle having raised ane proces against Tushielaw befor their Lordships, for his libertie, They humbly and with all Submission intreated that if their Lordships Should ordaine them to Sett att libertie, the said Master John Grieve furth of their Tolbuith, They the Magistrats and Toun Councill of Selkirk might be freed of the forsaid arreistments and of any Subsidiary action againest them, and there Successors in office, And therfore Craving their Lordships to consider the premisses, and if their Lordships Should Ordain them to Sett the said Mr John Grieve at libertie furth of their Tolbuith, in which he was att present that then their Lordships might Declaire them free of any arreistments laid on, or any subsidiary action to be persued againest them, And that they and their Successors in office might be quyte therof, and free therfrae in all tyme coming, and that the said Master John Grieve might be Decerned and Ordained to pay to the Keepers of the Tolbuith Four Shilling Scots each day Since his said imprisonment as the house dues, and that befor he be by ther Lordships Sett at liberty as said is, as the said petition bears, Which petition being upon the nynth day of november last Read in presence of the saids Lords, and they having Considered the same with a verball report made by ane Committie of their own number in the mutuall proces Grieve of Pinacle againest Scot of Tushielaw together with ane petiiton by the Magistrats of Selkirk, which being read in their presence, together with ane Caption at the instance of Mr William Charletoun againest the Said Master John Grieve, with one execution of arrestment following theron made in the hands of the Saids Magistrats, The Saids Lords did therby Remmitt to the former Committie appoynted in the forsaid matter, And added therto the Earle of Leven and Lord Halcraig, to meet and Consider the grounds of the lybells principall and Reconvention together with the forsaid petition and matter represented therin, anent the said master John Grieves being Committed to and arreisted in prison befor the intenting of the proces be vertue of letters of Caption against him for civill debts, and Recommended to the said Committee to meet and report with their conveniencie, And appoynted intimation to be made by Grieve of Pinacle to Scott of Tushielaw, and the Arreisters and magistrats of Selkirk or Clerk therof to attend the said Committie for there more full information in the said matter, Therafter the Said cause being moved upon the day and date of thir presents The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, Considering that by their former Interloquitor, in the affair betwixt Scot of Tushielaw, and Grieve of Pinacle, and the Magistrats of Selkirk, Grieve of Pinacle was appoynted to intimat to the said Scot of Tushielane, the Magistrats of Selkirk, and the arreistours to Compear befor the Committy appoynted in the said matter, for there more full information therof, and that there being produced two Severall Consents to the said Grieve of Pinacle his liberty furth of the Tolbuith of Selkirk, one wherof under the hand of Andrew Riddell of Hanning ane arreistor, and ane other under the hands of Walter Scott, in Wauchope another arreister as assigney by Charletoun, and that therupon the Magistrats of Selkirk had withdrawn there bill, and that the procurators and agent for Scot of Tushielaw had Compeired befor the Committie and Verbally Consented to Sett Pinacle at liberty, Therfore the saids Lords of her majesties privie Councill have Found and heirby Finds that the said Grieve of Pinacle was illegally and wrongously apprehended and Committed prisoner in the Tolbuith of Selkirk, And therfore the saids Lords Gave their Order and warrand, and Commanded and Ordained the Magistrats of Selkirk, and Keepers of their Tolbuith instantly to Sett the person of the said Master John Grieve of Pinacle at liberty furth therof free of housedewes, And for which this should be to them and all Concerned ane sufficient warrand And Discharged all person or persones whatsomever upon publick or privat account to trouble molest, secure or detaine the said Master John Grieve his person, or execut any dilligence against him, Wherby his person Should be made prisoner for the space of Fortie eight hours, from and after the tyme he should be sett att libertie, and goe Furth of the said Tolbuith of Selkirk

Edinburgh 5th December 1704

D1704/12/21

Act

Act for liberating Mr John Grieve furth of the Tolbuith of Selkirk

Annent the principall lybell or letters of Complaint raised and persued befor the Lords of her Majesties privy Councill, at the instance of Mr John Grieve of Pinacle with concourse of Sir James Steuart her Majesties Advocat for her highness interest in the matter underwritten Makeing mention That where by the Lawes of this and all well governed Nations the Seaseing of the Leidges, and depryveing them of their liberty without any warrand or authority of ane Judge, especially when the same was done by armed force, and with Cruelty against persons of age, And by ane invasion within our Kingdome of England, and the using of privat prisons are all Crymes of ane high nature, and Severly punishable, Yet Nevertheless it was of verity that Walter Scott late of Tushielaw, John Tout his Tennent […] Walter Scott merchant ther, Thomas MacDougall of Stodrigge and his Servant, William Purdie, Servitor to the Laird of Langlands, William Barrie Servant to […] William Loram Servant to Todrigg James […] Messenger in Kelso, James Scott Servant to Whitslade, Patrick Chisime Servant to Gledstones, at Sweat gairdner at Martine did upon the nynteenth day of November last Jaj vic and two years goe into England, being to the number of ten or twelve armed with Gunns Carrobines, Swords, Pistolls and therat or about the villadge of Cornhill Sorround and Sease the said Mr John Grieve Complainer a man of Sixtie three years of age, and he having indeavoured to throw himselfe of his horse, and Struggled for his liberty The Saids Defenders or ane or other of them did impiously and barbarously call out God damn him, murder the Day or words of the like import, and having forced him along through the Town and hawghs of Cornwall, and brought him through Tweed, the said Defenders carryed him to Kelso, where he was kept in a private house prisoner, untill ane Messenger and a Caption for a pretended debt was gott, and then they carryed the said Complainer to the Tolbuith of Selkirk, where he was Shutt up in a roume having Four windows with great iron grates without glass, or Shutters, and deprived of bed or other necessars, in the cold winter Season, therby making use of the Shaddow of Law, to continue what had been begun by unjust force and violence, and which was executed with the utmost Crueltie and severtie by all which the said Walter Scott and his accomplices abovenamed or ane or other of them, are guilty airt and pairt of the Crymes abovelybelled, and ought to be Decerned to repair the said Mr John Grieve of his Damnadges, Lykeas the said Mr John Grieve ought to be Sett at Libertie, and the said Walter Scott, and his accomplices punished in their persons and goods according to the demerite of the Cryme, to the Terror of others to Committ the like in tymecomeing, And Anent The charge given to the Saids Defenders to have Compeared personally2 befor the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, at ane certain day now bygone to have answered to the grounds of the forsaid Complaint, and to have heard and seen such order and Course taken theranent, as the saids Lords Should find just, as the said lybell or letters of Complaint, with the executions therof at more length proports, And alse Anent the letters or lybell of Reconvention also raised and persued befor the Lords of privie Councill at the instance of the saids Walter Scott of Tushielaw, John Tait his Tennent, […] Hude late of Hardlaw, now in Kelso, Walter Scott merchant there Thomas MacDougall of Stodrigg and […] his Servant, William Purdie Servant to the Laird of Langlands, William Barrie Servitor to Whitslade William Loran Servitor to Todrigg […] Brown Messenger at Kelso, James Scott Servitor to Whitslade Patrick Chisholme Servitor to Glaidstanes, and […] Sweat Gardiner at Mairtoun, with Concurse of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat, for her highness interest in the matter underwritten, That where by the Lawes of this and all well governed Nations, the raiseing of groundless and malicious persuits and accusations to the vexation of the Subjects, especially by persons not only Rebells and Fugitives from the Law, and who therby deserve not the protection therof, But throw manifest defraud and cheating of their Creditors withdraw their persons and effects into other Kingdomes, to Shunn the execution of the Law and payment of their just debts And not only lybelling falsehoods, But lykewayes complaining of persons, who were not so much as present or Concerned in deeds alleadged to have been committed and therby troubleing and vexing them, and obliedging them to withdraw them from their Bussiness and imployment, To attend malicious and groundless Complaints to their great charge and expensses are Crymes of ane high nature, and deserve Severly to be punished, as also by the Fyfth act of the Sixth Session of the first parliament of King William all persons guiltie of Defrauding Creditors are to be Declaired infamus infamia juris, And to be otherwayes punished, Yet Nevertheless Master John Grieve late of Pinacle albeit he was Denounced Rebell and Caption taken out against him, for not obedience given to ane Decreit of the Lords of our Councill and Session upon ane gross malversation of Trust, at the instance of the said Walter Scott one of the Complainers, and did withdraw his person and effects out of the Kingdome to the defrauding of just Creditors, Yet being incarcerat in Selkirk Tolbuith did presume Still to carry on his villanie, and had raised a malicious Complaint and Lybell, without all ground of Law, alleadging that he was illegally carried by force out of England by the saids Complainers, Wheras it was certain he was not only Rebell Fugitive from Law, and had withdrawen his effects out of the Kingdome to the defraud of the Creditors, But lykewayes lying under Caption, and ane warrand issued out by the Sherriffe of Roxburgh Shyre for apprehending him, And in the circumstance he was in, was in the case of a Debitor Fugitious, as also that the like had been practised by the English upon Scotsmen in the Scots Syde particularly by the Toun of Berwick who at their own hands Seized upon ane Tennent or Servant of the Laird of Lambertouns, and carried him prisoner out of his ground, as also attempted to doe the same upon a Scots man within the Toun of Caldstream and severall other instances, And furder it could be proven that the haill Complainers abovementioned (except he the said Walter Scott of Tushelaw) were alibi at the tyme of of3 his apprehension, Wherethrorow it was evident how malicious and groundless the said persuite was againest all Law, And therfore the said Mr John Grieve late of Pinacle ought not only to be Decerned in the Soume of […] as Damnadges and charges Sustained by the Complainers, But otherwayes punished in his person, and goods, as the Lords of the privie Councill should think fitt. And Anent The Charge given to the said Defender to have Compeared personallie befor the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill at ane certain day bygone, To have heard and seen Such order and course taken theranent, as in the saids letters of Reconvention at more length is Contained, Which Lybells principall and Reconvention being upon the twentie Second day of June last bypast called in presence of the saids Lords, and the said persuer in the principall lybell who is Defender in the Reconvention Compearing at the Barr by Sir David Dalrymple his Advocat, and the Defenders in the principall lybell who are persuers in the Reconvention Compearing also at the Barr by Sir Walter Pringle, and Master William Scott Advocats forsaids for the Saids Defenders in the principall lybell gave in the answers therto following, Makeing Mention That the lybell bears that the Complainer was violently seized upon the english Syde by Walter Scott, and the other Defenders, and by them brought to the Toun of Kelso, where he was detained in ane privat house till ane Messenger and Caption was gott for ane pretended debt, and thence carried to Selkirk prison, where he hes indured much through the badness of the prison, and coldness of the winter, And therfore concludes that he ought to be Sett at liberty, his Damnadges refounded, and the Defenders otherwayes punished, It was answered, primo, That esto the Complainer could prove his lybell yet the Same was not competent befor the privy Councill, nor will their Lordships think fitt to trouble themselves with the cognisance of ane affair, that appears properly cognoscible befor the Lords of Session Insofarras the lybell acknowledges the Complainers imprisonment in Selkirk, by vertue of ane Caption upon ane pretended debt, And the truth was the ground of the Caption was ane Decreit obtained befor the Lords at Walter Scotts instance against the Complainer upon ane gross malversation, and denyall of ane exuberant Trust, nottour to the whole Countrey, and found by the Lords nomine contradicente, so that the Seasing of the Complainer, being after Caption was taken out, the legality or illegality therof is only competent to the Lords of Session, who properly cognosces in the execution of their own Decreits and Sentences. Secundo Esto the Lords of Councill Should take cognisance of the matter befor themselves yet the lybell is nowayes relevant for primo, albeit it were true that he was seized in the english Syde, yet being ane Scotsman rebell, and Fugitive from the Law, and withall haveing withdrawen his effects out of Scotland, to the Defraud of the forsaid Decreit of trust (ane additionall Crime to the Malverse) and therby being under such Circumstances as Law in its forme could not have execution againest him, what hinders whey the pairties interested and prejudged may not where they could, sease upon such ane Fugitive, apprehend and detaine him till Law take its force, This being plainly a Case of necessity, and the pairtie Complaining being primus in reatu, by a most gross malverse and breach of faith, and by abstracting his person and goods out of the Jurisdiction, so as that he did first withdraw himselfe from the execution of the Law of his own Countrey, he is in pessima fide now to pretend to the protection of that Law he withdrew himselfe from, And the case with the Defender Walter Scot was Such that it was impossible for him to have execution against the Complainer in England, for the Decreits of our Courts have no face there, neither could he have Secured his person, nor affected his goods by vertue therof, And all Lawiers did acknowledge, that in Such cases of necessity, where the execution of the Law cannot take place by publick authority the ordinar rules and forms might be 4 Common Law is express Tit: quei in frandem Creditorum, that in excussione Debitoris fugitivi a Creditor might propria authoritate, arreist, seise, upon persons or goods, and apply the Same for his own payment, Nor does there appear any difference betwixt this and the apprehending of a Thiefe, who by the dayly Customes of the borders, may be followed in to both Nations and apprehended, The Substracting and carrying of of5 the effects to defraud just Creditors being no less Crime, yea by the Custome of a very polite Neighbouring Nation this is alse Severely punished as either theft or robbery, And by the fyfth Act Sixth Session of his late Majesties parliament, Such are Declaired infamous, Infamia juris, and otherwayes punishable, But Secundo, any ground of Complaint that could be in this case would seem to be competent only to the neighbouring nation as being ane Incroachment upon their Jurisdiction But Seeing there was no lybell, or Complaint, at their instance, it Seemes to be altogether incompetent to the Complainer, who was lying under Caption, and was her Majesties rebell, and So has not personam Standi in judicio, and cannot be allowed, to prosecute any accusation or have the benefite of Law, till he be relaxed, But esto he had the concurse of the other Nation, they could not be heard, and which the Defenders make use of as a seperat defence, Because they offerr to prove, this has been the practise of the English, and especially the Toun of Berwick, who did Some years agoe send a pairtie out of their Town, and apprehended a Tennent or Servant of the Laird of Lambertouns in Scots ground, and carried him prisoner, to Berwick who did all this for a civill debt, which was Still the more gross, that the person, apprehended by them was a Scotsman against whom they might have had good Law, and ready execution befor any Judicature in Scotland, Wheras the present case was only the bringing back a Scotsman, fugitive from the Law of his own Countrey And another instance of the like nature pratised by the Toun of Berwick in the Toun of Coldstream which tho it did not Succeed (the person having absconded) yet their sending ane pairty and Searching upon the Scots Syde was offerred to be proven, which was enough to verifie the practise, And of all the Borders the Toun of Berwick deserves least to be countenanced by the Scots, Their debarring Scotsmen from the Freedome of their Town, and being prentises therin was knowen to their Lordships, as also there disaffection to the Scots upon all occasions, Tertio Tushelaw has produced in the Clerks hands, ane order from the Sherriffe of Roxburgh Shire, be vertue wherof the Complainer was apprehended and detained in Kelso till he was Committed to Selkirk Tolbuith, by vertue of a Caption also produced, As to the other Circumstances of the lybell anent the condition of his prison and his own Circumstances they are of no moment The Magistrats of the place are answerable for their prison, and if he pay his debt, or find Caution he Shall be freed from that inconveniency at Tushielaw’s hand, It was likewise answered separatim for John Tait Tennent to Walter Scot […] Hudlate of Hurdlaw now in Kelso, Walter Scot merchant there, Thomas MacDougall of Stodrigg and […] his Servant, William Purdie Servitor to the Laird of Langlands, William Barnie Servitor to Whitslade, William Lorwn Servitor to Todrigg […] Brown messenger in Kelso, James Scott Servitor to Whitslade, Patrick Chisolme Servitor to Gladstanes, and […] Sweet Gairdner at Martine, that they were most maliciously complained upon, not being upon the place that day, nor Concerned in the alleadged apprehension for which and the other reasons abovementioned, there are6 letters of Reconvention and exculpation raised, as the saids answers bears, And the said Sir David Dalrymple Advocat for the persuer of the principall lybell who is Defender in the Reconvention, Gave in the answers following to the Said lybell of Reconvention, bearing Pinacle having Complained to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill against Tushielaw, as being guilty of a ryot against the Law of Nations, and the particular Lawes of this Kingdome, insofar as Tushielaw did Seise the said Pinacle without the authority of any Judge, by open force in the Kingdome of England and brought him over the border, which was contrary to the Law of Nations, and the good correspondence betwixt the Two Kingdomes, And this unjust violence being Committed upon the said Mr John Grieve, he has undenyable interest to Complain, But in the nixt place Tushielaw did not only violate the Law of Nations, by Seiseing Pinacle in maner above mentioned, but he did also manifestly violate the Lawes of this Kingdome having kept him in a privat prison twentie four hours befor a Caption could be found to give collour to these violencies, Tushielaw for taking of this complaint did first give in ane injurious petition, And the Lords of the privie Councill having thought fitt that Pinacle Should insist by way of libell, Tushielaw has raised a Reconvention, alleadging in Substance that the said Master John Grieve was unworthy of the protection of the Law, having first defrauded the said Tushielaw, and afterwards fled from the execution of the Law, and that he was in the case of a Doctor taken in fuga, And for clearing this alleadgance there is a Story told of a Trust, which Tushielaw reposed in Pinacle and which Pinacle denyed, But was Nevertheless Sustained by a Solemn Decreit of the Lords of Session And this Reconvention is Stufft with the terms of cheats and villanies, which are not only injurious to Pinacle but disrespectfull as he conceives to the most honorable privie Councill, Seeing Such Scurrillous lybells do noway Suite with the dignity of the privie Councill, To this injurious and Scurrillous lybell Pinacle makes the following answers, Primo, The Reconvention contains no relevant defences, for Supposeing the thing to be true, as they are alleadged, yet by no Law could the Defender seise the pursuer into a forreign Countrey, and take upon him sibi jus dicere, nor he could he retain him without Authoritie prisoner heire, And the pretence that he was rebell and unworthie the protection of the Law, was a meer conceit, for a Denounciation for a Civill debt, was no Such rebellion as the Defender pretends to imagine, nor was it left to him by his privat authoritie to determine, who was worthy of the protection of Laws or Government, And having determined put to his hands to execute, and whatever indulgence Tushielaw might promise himselfe upon his fair Stones, Yet Pinacle the persuer was confident, their Lordships would be farr from giving Countenance to so open a violation of Law, and liberty, Secundo It was no less frivolous to pretend that the persuer being a Deoctor might be taken in fuga for it could never be said, that Pinacle was taken in fuga, being taken in the Countrey where he resided Severall years, and even in these cases, if it be possible to have the authority of a Magistrat, they ought not to have proceeded without it, Tertio, Wheras the Reconvention insinuats, that the like has been practised in the Town of Berwick by Scots men upon the Border, It was answered, for anything the persuer knows, the instances were calumniously alleadged, Secundo They were not so manie as to ammount to the prooff of a Custome, nor indeed this a case, where Custome could establish any right, being against the Law of Nations, and againest peace and Order, that one Dominion Should incroach upon another, But Tertio These instances are not at all paralell to the persuer, unless it were alleadged that these incroachments being complained of, justice had been denyed; But this Argument was turly ane Aggravation of the injury complained of The Defender having the confidence to justifie and Sett up a maner of reprisealls contrary to Law and good Order, And that in a lybell offered to the privy Councill Quarto, Wheras the Defender insinuats, that he had the warrand of the Shirreff, It was answered, primo That it was Scarsely Supposeable that a Sherriffe would have interposed a warrand in this case, to take pairtie resideing in England requires at least a more emminent Authoritie, and was no matter of ordinary Jurisdiction, And Esto the Sherriffe could give order where a Caption was competent, and in the power of the pairty obtainer of the order, yet there having preceeded ane undenyable violence againest Law to make way for the execution of the Order, the obtainer of it could have no benefite by it, And the whole was but a Contryvance fraudem legi facere, nor does the Story of ane Order from the Sherriffe of Teviotdale answer the case, for the persewer was Seised at Cornwall, and brought prisoner to Caldstream which is in Berwick Shire Quinto as the Reconvention was truly irrelevant, so was it likewise contrary to the Defenders, and proves the persuers lybell7 against Tushielaw, insofar as the Reconvention pretends, that the other Defenders were alibi, except Tushielaw, Ergo a contrario Sensu, Tushielaw was present, and indeed the Lords may perceive by the Reconvention that the fact was owned and justified, and therfore this, if ever any case did, require redress to prevent the like in tymecomeing, Lastly it remains to clear the calumnies, which Tushielaw so boldly advances, as the merits of his cause, But Tushielaw knows very well, that it was impossible that the matter could be ledd in full light befor the privie Councill, however this much was certain that if Tushielaw would acknowledge the Truth, He could not but acknowledge that he was many years intertained in the persuers Family, And that after Tushielaw had might the right to the Pinacle, which he Since quarrelled upon the head of trust, Pinacle did conveen Tushelaw and his friends at Ashkirkmilne wherof some are yet alive, and offerred to Denude of Tushielaw’s estate if he or his Friends thought the purchase which he had made was too easie But there was not a Friend which Tushielaw had did quarrell it, or would interpose for him And although Pinacle has not been so carefull in the way of Securing himselfe, which has given occasion to the Decreit of Session against him, Yet Tushielaw must be Satisfied in his own Conscience that the Transaction was fair. But if the telling of a Story were sufficient to take of materiall crimes and ryots objected, Pinacle might inform, and could prove to their Lordships, if it were competent that the debt wherupon the Caption was founded againest him, was the product of a very nottorious abuse, for the Disposition of Tushielaws lands being Declared a Trust, and Pinacle appoynted to Compt, Pinacle did produce instructions to the value of Thirtie thousand pounds in ane Submission to arbiters who are yet alive and to take these instructions out of the way, Tushielaw did Seduce Pinacles eldest son ane unhappie young man to take up his Fathers writes from his agents relict, and for want of these writes was Pinacle Decerned, and was now under Caption, And that their Lordships might be Satisfied, that this was no story, Pinacles sons receipt wherin Tushielaw was a Subscrybeing witnes to David Morisons relict was produced, bearing a receipt of some particular papers expressly with these words; Together with severall other papers, which were given to the said David Morisone, by Master John Grieve of Pinacle his Father and him, when he was imployed ane agent for them, and it was well knowen that this son of Pinacles was ane profligat unhappy young8 man, and having ended with Tushielaw to the ruine of his Fathers Family went abroad as a Single Soldier, nor did this receipt come to Pinacles hands, till within this Forthnight, and as a convincing Materiall evidence that Tushielane att bottom was Satisfied the debt was unjust, Their Lordships would be informed, that for this debt he had used Inhibitions and arreistments Wherby he might have recovered all, or the farr greatest pairt of the debt, yet he discharged the Inhibition and the Cautioners in the arreistment, who were beyond exception good reserving to himselfe no other Security, but the gratfull pleasure of distressing pinacles person, and was it to be Supposed, that if there had been ane just claime for so great a Summ Tushelaw who was so vigorous, and uses Such injustifiable violence againest pinacle would had been so moderate, in the use of his other Securities, But the truth was the occasion of all this, was the Defenders malice, which has transported him beyond all bounds, Seeing therfore the lybell was undoubtedly relevant, and was not so much as denyed, but on the contrary rather acknowledged, Pinacle was confident their Lordships will Ordain him to be restored to his full liberty, and to the place where he was Seised, and punish the Said Walter Scot, according to the demerit of the Crime as the said answers also bears, And the said principall lybell and answers therto with the lybell of Reconvention and answers forsaid being read in presence of the saids Lords, And pairties Lawiers fullie heard and removed The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill upon the said twentie Second day of June last, Granted to the persuer in the principall lybell letters of second dilligence, by Caption againest Such of the witnesses as lived in the Scots Syde, and Granted full power warrand and Commission to […] With power to them to choise there own Clerk for whom they Should be answerable to take and receive the oaths and Depositions of Such famous witnesses living in the english syde as Should be adduced befor them by the said Master John Grieve, for proveing the principall lybell, And that att […] the […] dayes of July nixt to Come, or ane or other of the saids dayes, And whatever the saids witnesses Should happen to Depone in the said matter Ordained the saids Commissioners, and there said Clerk to putt the samen authentickly in write Subscrybed with ther hands, and to move and cause Such of the saids witnesses as could write Subscrybe the Samen also, And therafter to close seall and deliver the samen to the said persuer of the principall lybell, or any in his name having his order, To whom and his saids procurators, The Lords Assigned, and heirby Assignes the […] day of […] for produceing befor them this present Commission and report therof duly Subscrybed and sealled as said is, to the effect they might proceed to administer justice in the said matter, And Declaired the said Commission to be Granted cum onere expensarum maximarum to Scott of Tushelaw in case the persuer prove in the termes of the principall lybell, And Repelled the haill Deforces proponed for the Defenders in the principall lybell And Assoilzied the persuar therof from the lybell of Reconvention, And in the mean tyme Nominated and appoynted the Marquess of Annandale Lord President of the Privie Councill, The Lord Advocat and Lord Justice Clerk to be a Committie to endeavour to aggree pairties, And to report nixt Councill day and Recommended to the said Committie to meet to morrow at twelve acloack in the fornoon, and Declaired any Two a quorum, Therafter There being a petition given in and presented to the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by Robert Scott and Andrew Wauch present Baillies of the Burgh of Selkirk Humbly Shewing That where Sometyme agoe Master John Grieve late of Pinacle was brought to Selkirk, And there by vertue of ane Caption at the instance of Walter Scot of Tushielaw against him, was delivered over to them as present Baillies of the said Burgh, in order to be Committed prisoner in their Tolbuith therin to remain ay and while payment and Satisfaction Should be made by the Said Master John Grieve to the said Walter Scott of the Soume contained in the Caption, And they having in obedience to the said Caption Committed him to prison where he hitherto his Continued, they thought fitt to inform their Lordships that Sometyme therafter the said Master John Grieve was arreisted in by Andrew Riddell of Haining and Severall other persons for payment of great Soumes of money, And Pinacle having raised ane proces against Tushielaw befor their Lordships, for his libertie, They humbly and with all Submission intreated that if their Lordships Should ordaine them to Sett att libertie, the said Master John Grieve furth of their Tolbuith, They the Magistrats and Toun Councill of Selkirk might be freed of the forsaid arreistments and of any Subsidiary action againest them, and there Successors in office, And therfore Craving their Lordships to consider the premisses, and if their Lordships Should Ordain them to Sett the said Mr John Grieve at libertie furth of their Tolbuith, in which he was att present that then their Lordships might Declaire them free of any arreistments laid on, or any subsidiary action to be persued againest them, And that they and their Successors in office might be quyte therof, and free therfrae in all tyme coming, and that the said Master John Grieve might be Decerned and Ordained to pay to the Keepers of the Tolbuith Four Shilling Scots each day Since his said imprisonment as the house dues, and that befor he be by ther Lordships Sett at liberty as said is, as the said petition bears, Which petition being upon the nynth day of november last Read in presence of the saids Lords, and they having Considered the same with a verball report made by ane Committie of their own number in the mutuall proces Grieve of Pinacle againest Scot of Tushielaw together with ane petiiton by the Magistrats of Selkirk, which being read in their presence, together with ane Caption at the instance of Mr William Charletoun againest the Said Master John Grieve, with one execution of arrestment following theron made in the hands of the Saids Magistrats, The Saids Lords did therby Remmitt to the former Committie appoynted in the forsaid matter, And added therto the Earle of Leven and Lord Halcraig, to meet and Consider the grounds of the lybells principall and Reconvention together with the forsaid petition and matter represented therin, anent the said master John Grieves being Committed to and arreisted in prison befor the intenting of the proces be vertue of letters of Caption against him for civill debts, and Recommended to the said Committee to meet and report with their conveniencie, And appoynted intimation to be made by Grieve of Pinacle to Scott of Tushielaw, and the Arreisters and magistrats of Selkirk or Clerk therof to attend the said Committie for there more full information in the said matter, Therafter the Said cause being moved upon the day and date of thir presents The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, Considering that by their former Interloquitor, in the affair betwixt Scot of Tushielaw, and Grieve of Pinacle, and the Magistrats of Selkirk, Grieve of Pinacle was appoynted to intimat to the said Scot of Tushielane, the Magistrats of Selkirk, and the arreistours to Compear befor the Committy appoynted in the said matter, for there more full information therof, and that there being produced two Severall Consents to the said Grieve of Pinacle his liberty furth of the Tolbuith of Selkirk, one wherof under the hand of Andrew Riddell of Hanning ane arreistor, and ane other under the hands of Walter Scott, in Wauchope another arreister as assigney by Charletoun, and that therupon the Magistrats of Selkirk had withdrawn there bill, and that the procurators and agent for Scot of Tushielaw had Compeired befor the Committie and Verbally Consented to Sett Pinacle at liberty, Therfore the saids Lords of her majesties privie Councill have Found and heirby Finds that the said Grieve of Pinacle was illegally and wrongously apprehended and Committed prisoner in the Tolbuith of Selkirk, And therfore the saids Lords Gave their Order and warrand, and Commanded and Ordained the Magistrats of Selkirk, and Keepers of their Tolbuith instantly to Sett the person of the said Master John Grieve of Pinacle at liberty furth therof free of housedewes, And for which this should be to them and all Concerned ane sufficient warrand And Discharged all person or persones whatsomever upon publick or privat account to trouble molest, secure or detaine the said Master John Grieve his person, or execut any dilligence against him, Wherby his person Should be made prisoner for the space of Fortie eight hours, from and after the tyme he should be sett att libertie, and goe Furth of the said Tolbuith of Selkirk

1. NRS, PC2/28, 321v-327v.

2. The word ‘personally’ is an insertion.

3. Sic.

4. Half a line of illegible writing scored out here.

5. Sic.

6. The word ‘are’ is an insertion.

7. The word ‘lybell’ is an insertion.

8. The word ‘young’ is an insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 321v-327v.

2. The word ‘personally’ is an insertion.

3. Sic.

4. Half a line of illegible writing scored out here.

5. Sic.

6. The word ‘are’ is an insertion.

7. The word ‘lybell’ is an insertion.

8. The word ‘young’ is an insertion.

Sederunt, 5 December 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh 5th December 17041

D1704/12/12

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Rothes P:S:; Marquis of Montrose; Marquis of Lothian; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Findlater; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Earl of Roseberrie; Lord Belhaven; Lord President of Session; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Arnistoun; Lord Halcraig; Lord Anstruther; Lord Phesdo; Lievetenent General Ramsay; Mr Fran: Montgomery; Laird of Blackader; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Edinburgh 5th December 17041

D1704/12/12

Sederunt

Lord Chancellor; Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Rothes P:S:; Marquis of Montrose; Marquis of Lothian; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Findlater; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Earl of Roseberrie; Lord Belhaven; Lord President of Session; Lord Advocat; Lord Thesaurer Deput; Lord Arnistoun; Lord Halcraig; Lord Anstruther; Lord Phesdo; Lievetenent General Ramsay; Mr Fran: Montgomery; Laird of Blackader; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/28, 321r.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 320v-321r.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 321r.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 320v-321r.

Act, 30 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/151

Act

Act In favours of the Burgh of Annan

Anent The petition given in and presented to the Lords of his Majesties privie Councill, by the Magistrats and Toun Councill of the Burgh of Annan, Shewing, That there being a Bridge of Fyve arches built over the river of Annan for the Service of the Leidges and preserveing ane ready passage of Such as had occasion to travell for Merchandise or otherwayes to and from the Shires of Drumfreis Galloway and Air to England was now furnished upon the great expensses travell and pains of the petitioners, and that the maintaining and keeping in repair of the said Bridge, and the high wayes and Cassyes leading to, from, and at the said Bridge, did necessarly requyre ane greater charge and expence yearly to be laid then the petitioners were able to affoord, as also by the Sixteen act of the Second parliament King Charles Second, The repairing and keeping up of bridges, and upholding the Cassyes and wayes leading to and from the Same, are so farr Considered as ane usefull and necessary work, That power was expressly given to their Lordships, To ordain the levieing of modern Customes at Bridges, for the repairing and upholding therof And to appoynt the endurance of the same as their Lordships Should See cause Conforme to which power given to their Lordships small Customs had been allowed and appoynted to be uplifted at severall Bridges within this Kingdome and particularly by their Lordships act of the date the Twentie nynth of July Jaj vic nyntie Seven years, there were allowed and appoynted to be Collected and uplifted at Bothwell bridge the small customes following For repairing and upholding therof, Viz: For each foot man Two pennies each horseman, Sex pennies for everie ox Cow, Stirk, quey, horse, mare, Staig or others of these kinds Four pennies for each Load of victuall, eight pennies, for each pack of merchandise or other goods two Shilling all Scots money, And that for the Space of three nyntein years, Commenseing from the tyme therinmentioned, And the forsaid Bridge over the river of Annan being of alse generall use, And requyring no less charge and expence to repair and uphold the same, And therfore Craving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears, The Lords of his Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them be the Magistrats and Toun Councill of the Burgh of Annan, and the Samen being read in their presence, The Saids Lords have allowed and ordained, and heirby allowes and Ordaines The small Customes and Duties of Two pennies for each footman sex pennies for each horseman, Four pennies for each ox, Cow, Stirk, quey, horse, mare, Staig, and others of these kinds, and eight pennies for each load of victuall, And two shilling for each pack of Merchandise or other goods all Scots money, To be levied exacted and uptaken at the Said Bridge over the river of Annan for the Space of Three Nynteen years, Commenseing from the first day of January next to Come, by the petitioners, For upholding maintaining and repairing the said bridge, or Such as the petitioners Shall imploy For collecting and uplifting therof upon there giving bond and finding Sufficient Caution to imploy the same for the forsaid at the sight alwayes of the Marquess of Annandale, his heirs and Successors

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/151

Act

Act In favours of the Burgh of Annan

Anent The petition given in and presented to the Lords of his Majesties privie Councill, by the Magistrats and Toun Councill of the Burgh of Annan, Shewing, That there being a Bridge of Fyve arches built over the river of Annan for the Service of the Leidges and preserveing ane ready passage of Such as had occasion to travell for Merchandise or otherwayes to and from the Shires of Drumfreis Galloway and Air to England was now furnished upon the great expensses travell and pains of the petitioners, and that the maintaining and keeping in repair of the said Bridge, and the high wayes and Cassyes leading to, from, and at the said Bridge, did necessarly requyre ane greater charge and expence yearly to be laid then the petitioners were able to affoord, as also by the Sixteen act of the Second parliament King Charles Second, The repairing and keeping up of bridges, and upholding the Cassyes and wayes leading to and from the Same, are so farr Considered as ane usefull and necessary work, That power was expressly given to their Lordships, To ordain the levieing of modern Customes at Bridges, for the repairing and upholding therof And to appoynt the endurance of the same as their Lordships Should See cause Conforme to which power given to their Lordships small Customs had been allowed and appoynted to be uplifted at severall Bridges within this Kingdome and particularly by their Lordships act of the date the Twentie nynth of July Jaj vic nyntie Seven years, there were allowed and appoynted to be Collected and uplifted at Bothwell bridge the small customes following For repairing and upholding therof, Viz: For each foot man Two pennies each horseman, Sex pennies for everie ox Cow, Stirk, quey, horse, mare, Staig or others of these kinds Four pennies for each Load of victuall, eight pennies, for each pack of merchandise or other goods two Shilling all Scots money, And that for the Space of three nyntein years, Commenseing from the tyme therinmentioned, And the forsaid Bridge over the river of Annan being of alse generall use, And requyring no less charge and expence to repair and uphold the same, And therfore Craving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears, The Lords of his Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them be the Magistrats and Toun Councill of the Burgh of Annan, and the Samen being read in their presence, The Saids Lords have allowed and ordained, and heirby allowes and Ordaines The small Customes and Duties of Two pennies for each footman sex pennies for each horseman, Four pennies for each ox, Cow, Stirk, quey, horse, mare, Staig, and others of these kinds, and eight pennies for each load of victuall, And two shilling for each pack of Merchandise or other goods all Scots money, To be levied exacted and uptaken at the Said Bridge over the river of Annan for the Space of Three Nynteen years, Commenseing from the first day of January next to Come, by the petitioners, For upholding maintaining and repairing the said bridge, or Such as the petitioners Shall imploy For collecting and uplifting therof upon there giving bond and finding Sufficient Caution to imploy the same for the forsaid at the sight alwayes of the Marquess of Annandale, his heirs and Successors

1. NRS, PC2/28, 320v-321v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 320v-321v.

Decreet, 30 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/141

Decreet

Interloquitor upon the petition by Captain Donaldson and the Hammermen in Edinburgh

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lord president, and the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by James Donaldson Merchant in Edinburgh, Shewing that wher by the act of security all her majesties protestant subjects of this Kingdome are to be armed, and probably ther may be vast sums of money sent abroad to purchase arms to the Detriment of this nation, wheras the Kingdome may be Served within itself, if incouradgement were granted, The petitioner humbly Represents that he has (after great pains) found out ane effectuall way to make machines, wherby severall parts of the calling and art of smith Craft, particularly with relation to the making of arms may be performed without the Strenth and labour of men, such as blowing with bellowes, boring with run Spindles, beating with hammers, Stricking of files, by help of which machines the making of arms, and other pairts of smithcraft will be much facilitate, and the money (which otherwayes would be exported, to the incouradgement of Foreigners) may be kept within the Kingdom, to the encouradgement of our own tradesmen and universall benefite of the Subjects, especially at Such a juncture when great numers of arms are required, And therfor Craving their Lordships to take the premisses to consideration and allow the petitioner and Such pairtners as Shall joine with him, to set up a manufactorie for making of arms and other things relating to Smithcraft, with the ordinary priviledges allowed to publick manufactories, and to Discharge all others within this Kingdom for the Space of […] years to make use of Such engines or Machines which Shall be made use of by the petitioner and partners that has never hitherto been made use of in this Kingdom under the pain of forfeiting the said instruments or Machins to the petitioner or his assigney’s, and to pay him or them the Sum of […] fine, over the forsaid forfeiture as is customary in the like cases, and if any Difficultie remain with their Lordships anent the operation of the said Machines, The petitioner humbly represents that he has a modell of the same, now in readiness, which Shall be Shown to any of their Lordships number, whom you shall please to appoint to See the same as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition given in to them by James Donaldson merchant in Edinburgh, and the samen being read in their presence The Saids Lords Doe heirby nominate and appoynt the Earles of Lauderdale Lord Enstruther and the provest of Edinburgh to be a Committy to consider the above petition and matter therin Represented and to report nixt Councill day and Declares any two a quorum 2 Lords, And having heard a verball Report made by the Committy appoynted to consider Captain Donaldsons petition they heirby allow the Deacon of the Smiths to see and answer the same next Councill day peremptorie Accordingly the said Deacon of the Smiths Having seen the said petition He returned the samen with the Answers following Viz. That there having been a petition given into the saids Lords By James Donaldson, Representing that Seeing by the act of Security her Majesties Protestant Subjects are to be armed, which may occasion great Soumes of money to be Sent abroad for purchasing of arms to the great loss of the Nation, and that he having discovered ane effectuall way to make machines with relation to the making of armes, which may facilitate the working therof without the Strength and labour of men by blowing bellowes, boreing with run Spindles, beating with hammers Stricking with fyles, and therfore craving the Saids Lords will allow him and Such partners he Shall assume to Sett up manufactories for making of armes and others relating to Smithcraft with all priviledge Competent to Manufactories and to Discharge all others for the Space of […] years to make use of Such machines under the payne of forfaulting the instruments or machines and to pay to him or his assigney’s the Soume of […] of penaltie The Saids Lords having out of their goodness and justice allowed them to see and answer the said petition, They humbly begg leave to Represent primo It was well knowen that James Donaldson never professed any Skill or knowledge, and has had far less experience in Mechanicks particularly their trade, and the designe of the petition Seem’s either to be out of malice and prejudice to their petitioners, or else the proposall of the Machine was but ane engine to inhaune a little money to Supply his necessity Seeing he knowes verie well they are far more capable to provyde both the publict and private persons with good and Sufficient arm’s and so to prevent the export of money for that end then he can pretend to, Secundo They are founded in the poynt of right Seeing by their Soles of cause and other priviledges granted to them by her Majesties Royall predecessors Magistrats and Toun Councill of Edinburgh and ratified in parliament, wherof they had been in the immemoriall uninterrupted possession, They had the sole exercise and priviledge of making and selling of armes within Burgh and the Desire of Such a manufactory or Monopolie was not only encroachment upon, but ane Inhinging of ther Saids rights and priviledges ratified as Said is, Tertio when ever any good artift Countrey man or Forraigner that merits by his Skill and experience to be assumed to their fraternity they never Declyned the Same upon application for that effect But did alwayes give and will give Such persones due encouradgement, So that if any good artist who works other work then their petitioners does (which Mr Donaldsone will not pretend to) were desirous to be Incorporat with them, They would not Declyne to assume him which was all that could be requyred, and answers the Design and end of the petition But Quarto as they are more able and capable to furnish both publict and private armes of all Sorts at reasonable and easie rates, and can make use of machines for that end to better purpose then Mr Donadlsone can pretend to, so they undertake to furnish both publict and private with Such quantities of armes good and sufficient as Shall be Desired at as easie rates as they can be had from abroad wherby the export of money for that end will be prevented, and therfor Craving their Lordships In respect of the premisses to refuse the Desire of the Said James Donaldsons Petition as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them by James Donaldsone merchant in Edinburgh together with the above petition by way of answers therto by the Incorporation of the hammermen of Edinburgh, and the Samen being read in their presence the Saids Lords doe heirby Recommend to the former Committy appoynted in the said matter, and adds therto the Earle of Leven to endeavour to adjust matters betwixt the saids petitioners as to what is represented in the forsaids petitions and to report and continues the quorum as formerly, Which petition of Captain Donaldsons and answers therto by the Incorporation of the Hammermen being upon the thirtieth of this instant Considered by the saids Lords they have refused and heirby refuses the Desire of Captains Donaldsons petition

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/141

Decreet

Interloquitor upon the petition by Captain Donaldson and the Hammermen in Edinburgh

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lord president, and the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by James Donaldson Merchant in Edinburgh, Shewing that wher by the act of security all her majesties protestant subjects of this Kingdome are to be armed, and probably ther may be vast sums of money sent abroad to purchase arms to the Detriment of this nation, wheras the Kingdome may be Served within itself, if incouradgement were granted, The petitioner humbly Represents that he has (after great pains) found out ane effectuall way to make machines, wherby severall parts of the calling and art of smith Craft, particularly with relation to the making of arms may be performed without the Strenth and labour of men, such as blowing with bellowes, boring with run Spindles, beating with hammers, Stricking of files, by help of which machines the making of arms, and other pairts of smithcraft will be much facilitate, and the money (which otherwayes would be exported, to the incouradgement of Foreigners) may be kept within the Kingdom, to the encouradgement of our own tradesmen and universall benefite of the Subjects, especially at Such a juncture when great numers of arms are required, And therfor Craving their Lordships to take the premisses to consideration and allow the petitioner and Such pairtners as Shall joine with him, to set up a manufactorie for making of arms and other things relating to Smithcraft, with the ordinary priviledges allowed to publick manufactories, and to Discharge all others within this Kingdom for the Space of […] years to make use of Such engines or Machines which Shall be made use of by the petitioner and partners that has never hitherto been made use of in this Kingdom under the pain of forfeiting the said instruments or Machins to the petitioner or his assigney’s, and to pay him or them the Sum of […] fine, over the forsaid forfeiture as is customary in the like cases, and if any Difficultie remain with their Lordships anent the operation of the said Machines, The petitioner humbly represents that he has a modell of the same, now in readiness, which Shall be Shown to any of their Lordships number, whom you shall please to appoint to See the same as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition given in to them by James Donaldson merchant in Edinburgh, and the samen being read in their presence The Saids Lords Doe heirby nominate and appoynt the Earles of Lauderdale Lord Enstruther and the provest of Edinburgh to be a Committy to consider the above petition and matter therin Represented and to report nixt Councill day and Declares any two a quorum 2 Lords, And having heard a verball Report made by the Committy appoynted to consider Captain Donaldsons petition they heirby allow the Deacon of the Smiths to see and answer the same next Councill day peremptorie Accordingly the said Deacon of the Smiths Having seen the said petition He returned the samen with the Answers following Viz. That there having been a petition given into the saids Lords By James Donaldson, Representing that Seeing by the act of Security her Majesties Protestant Subjects are to be armed, which may occasion great Soumes of money to be Sent abroad for purchasing of arms to the great loss of the Nation, and that he having discovered ane effectuall way to make machines with relation to the making of armes, which may facilitate the working therof without the Strength and labour of men by blowing bellowes, boreing with run Spindles, beating with hammers Stricking with fyles, and therfore craving the Saids Lords will allow him and Such partners he Shall assume to Sett up manufactories for making of armes and others relating to Smithcraft with all priviledge Competent to Manufactories and to Discharge all others for the Space of […] years to make use of Such machines under the payne of forfaulting the instruments or machines and to pay to him or his assigney’s the Soume of […] of penaltie The Saids Lords having out of their goodness and justice allowed them to see and answer the said petition, They humbly begg leave to Represent primo It was well knowen that James Donaldson never professed any Skill or knowledge, and has had far less experience in Mechanicks particularly their trade, and the designe of the petition Seem’s either to be out of malice and prejudice to their petitioners, or else the proposall of the Machine was but ane engine to inhaune a little money to Supply his necessity Seeing he knowes verie well they are far more capable to provyde both the publict and private persons with good and Sufficient arm’s and so to prevent the export of money for that end then he can pretend to, Secundo They are founded in the poynt of right Seeing by their Soles of cause and other priviledges granted to them by her Majesties Royall predecessors Magistrats and Toun Councill of Edinburgh and ratified in parliament, wherof they had been in the immemoriall uninterrupted possession, They had the sole exercise and priviledge of making and selling of armes within Burgh and the Desire of Such a manufactory or Monopolie was not only encroachment upon, but ane Inhinging of ther Saids rights and priviledges ratified as Said is, Tertio when ever any good artift Countrey man or Forraigner that merits by his Skill and experience to be assumed to their fraternity they never Declyned the Same upon application for that effect But did alwayes give and will give Such persones due encouradgement, So that if any good artist who works other work then their petitioners does (which Mr Donaldsone will not pretend to) were desirous to be Incorporat with them, They would not Declyne to assume him which was all that could be requyred, and answers the Design and end of the petition But Quarto as they are more able and capable to furnish both publict and private armes of all Sorts at reasonable and easie rates, and can make use of machines for that end to better purpose then Mr Donadlsone can pretend to, so they undertake to furnish both publict and private with Such quantities of armes good and sufficient as Shall be Desired at as easie rates as they can be had from abroad wherby the export of money for that end will be prevented, and therfor Craving their Lordships In respect of the premisses to refuse the Desire of the Said James Donaldsons Petition as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them by James Donaldsone merchant in Edinburgh together with the above petition by way of answers therto by the Incorporation of the hammermen of Edinburgh, and the Samen being read in their presence the Saids Lords doe heirby Recommend to the former Committy appoynted in the said matter, and adds therto the Earle of Leven to endeavour to adjust matters betwixt the saids petitioners as to what is represented in the forsaids petitions and to report and continues the quorum as formerly, Which petition of Captain Donaldsons and answers therto by the Incorporation of the Hammermen being upon the thirtieth of this instant Considered by the saids Lords they have refused and heirby refuses the Desire of Captains Donaldsons petition

1. NRS, PC2/28, 319r-320v.

2. Marginal note: ‘Which Petition being upon the Sixteenth instant Read in presence of the saids’.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 319r-320v.

2. Marginal note: ‘Which Petition being upon the Sixteenth instant Read in presence of the saids’.

Decreet, 30 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/131

Decreet

Decreit absolvitor John Duff and others against Davidsone of Newtoune

Anent the principall lybell or letters of Complaint raised and persewed befor the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill at the instance of Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun now of Geight, with concourse of Sir James Stewart Her Majesties advocat for her Highness interest, Makeing Mention that where by the Lawes of this and all other well governed Realms the publict peace ought to be be2 observed and all persons secure under the faith therof and protection of the Government, and that for any to brake the same by attacking and assaulting or injuring any other in their person or goods specially when done under a pretence and collour of friendship and a pretext of Law and legall dilligence and also on the Lords day when all execution even through legall ought to cease Is a high Cryme and ought to be Severly punished and the persone injured aught also to be restored and reponed againest all the effects and consequences therof Nevertheless It is of verity that James Hamilton of Cupbardie Mr William Gordon in Towie Robert Gordon his Brother […] Bruce and […] their servants and accomplices and John Duff messenger and […] Servitor to the Said John Duff Shaking off all regaird to our authority and Laws coming upon the Sixteenth of September last being Saturday at ten acloack at night to the house of Geicht, as if they had been friends and in a peaceable manner, were ther kyndlie entertained at Supper But after they had Stayed till two acloack on Sunday morning being the seventeenth of the said moneth and would needs be gone the Complainer did in Civility convoy them to their horses and than and ther the said James Hamiltoun of Cupbardie with Duff the messenger and other persons abovenamed Drew and cockt their pistolls and the messenger told Geicht that he was his prisoner at Patrick Gordons instance, Wherupon they all laid hold on him and took his sword from him braking it in the scabard and beat him to the great effusion of his bloud and the said Cupbardie threatned to Shoot on of Geichts Servants who offered to rescue him from their violence, and the saids persons having taken Geicht thus illegally on the Lords Day and violently and treacherously in manner forsaid They carried him as a prisoner all the Lords Day without regaird to the Divyne Service from place to place, and the said Cupbardie being Factor for the estate of Towie Did unlawfully Convocat the Tennents of Towie in arm’s to Destroy the Complainer, and thus carried him from one ale house to another Drinking Still on his Charges They keept him untill he gott a friend to pay the Debt in their pretended Caption, But when the Debt in the Caption was payed the said Messenger Duff would not pairt with the Complainer untill he extorted from him ane accepted bill of twentie pounds for his own Charges and when this was done the said Cupbardie told the Complainer (through he had not any ground or warrant for it) that he was Still his prisoner and Swore many bloody oaths he would not pairt with him but carry him wher no friend Should ever hear of him, Unless he would grant a bond of the like soume to Major Generall Buchan that within fourtein dayes he Should Registrat his Double of ane Contract of marriage and deliver ane Extract therof to the major Generall, Wherby the Complainer being Surprized, and Seeing a great many armed men upon the adjacent raising grounds ready to assist Cupbardie; and the Major Generall telling him that if he refused what was Demanded worse things might fall out, the Complainer and his Uncle Carnbryie were therby by violence and fear forced to grant the saids two bonds Lykeas all the tyme the Complainer was kept by them in Custody as a prisoner, They guarded him night and day with bended pistolls, By all which it is evident the said Hamiltoune of Cupbardie Mr William Gordon in Towie and Robert Gordon his Brother with the other persons abovenamed and Duff the Messenger are all and each of them Guiltie airt and pairt of a violent breach of the peace and most attrocious ryot and oppression and of having Committed privatam Carcerem, and the other violences and injuries abovementioned Which being proven befor the Lords of our privie Councill They ought not only to be Decerned in the Soume of Three thousand punds Scots of Damnages and expenses and ordained to redeliver the forsaid accepted bill and two bonds wrongously extorted as said is to be Cancelled, But also they ought to be farder punished in their persons and goods for the Crymes abovementioned to the example and terror of others to Committ the like in tyme coming, And anent the Chairge given to the Said Defender to have Compeired personally befor the Saids Lords at ane certain day bygone to have answered to the points of the said Complaint, and to have heard and Seen Such order and course taken theranent as the said Lords Should think fitt with certification as in the principall lybell or letters of complaint at more lenth is contained, And alse Anent the Lybell of Reconvention purchast and raised befor the saids Lords of Her Majesties privie Councill at the instance of the saids James Hamiltoun of Cupbairdie and John Duff messenger with concourse of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat for her Highness interest Making mention that where by the Laws of this and all well governed Nations the deforcing or attempting to deforce Messengers in the lawfull execution of their office, and yet Notwithstanding therof the traduceing the said Messenger and his assistants for doing their Duty by most calumnious Complaints befor the Lords of our privie Councill, as also the withdrawing and abstracting of wryts of greatest importance or being airt and pairt therof against faith and trust given to the Contrary, wherupon the intruster is Subjected to personall execution and many other hardships, and likewayes the defaming of her Majesties Leidges who are of unquestionable reputation with the odious Crymes of oppression and abuse of the Lords day, and the putting of them to unnecessary trouble and expenses theranent are Crimes of a high nature and Severly punishable, and the persons so injured ought to be redressed, Nevertheless It is of verity that Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun and now of Geicht is guilty of the forsaid Delinquencies insofarr as that the Complainer the said John Duff haveing upon the Sixteenth of September last being Saturday execute or offered to execute letters of Caption at the instance of Patrick Gordon merchant in Aberdein, in her Majesties name againest the said Alexander Davidsone He in Confidence of being at his own house of Gicht Did by himselfe with drawen Sword, and by his Servants Deforce or offer to Deforce this lawfull authoritie with violence and resistance as also the said Alexander Davidsone has taken the confidence to raise a Councill Complaint not only againest the said messenger but also against the Complainer the said James Hamiltoun of Copbairdie, which is most groundless and false in all the articles therof and which calumnie and Defamation is the more aggravat in regaird of the particulars following, Viz that the said Complainer hes been most notoriously abused by the said Alexander Davidsone his Father and others for his behove (with whom he is airt and pairt) insofarr as ther being a Contract of marriage betwixt the Said Alexander and the Heretrix of Gicht in which Alexander and his Father were bound to releive (upon a profitable translation) the old Lady Geicht, off the Debts of the family the Comapliner the said Hamiltoun of Cowbardie borroued the old Ladies Double of that Contract, and under the greatest appearance of friendship did Lend the Same to the said Alexander or his Father for his behove, Wherupon the old Ladie and Major Generall Buchan her husband being Distressed for many Debts of the family by Such Creditors as the said Alexander and his Father did most inhumanly hund out while they retained the Contract which obliedged them in relief of the Same as aforsaid having pursued the Complainer in ane Exhibition and obtained two Decreets in foro against the Complainer after he had made many instances to the said Alexander and his Father for freeing him by producing the forsaid Contract they most treacherously and ungratefully did keep the same up both from the Complainer and from the Major Generall and his Lady who prosecute the exhibition till at last the Complainer being taken with Caption and in his way to prison having called at the said Alexanders house on the Sixteenth day of September last (the Complainer being taken with Caption) in order to his make his last intreatie of his Liberating the Complainer by Delivering up the forsaid Contract and the Messenger who had the Complainer in Custody taking the opportunity of executing the forsaid Caption with which he was intrusted againest the said Alexander Davidsone at that tyme the said Alexander does most causelessly and absurdly make the Complainer a pairtie in his Councill complaint tho he had the best ground to be the first Complainer, and wes all along a prisoner himselfe and therfor the Complainer ought not only to be assolzied from the forsaid malicious complaint befor the Lords of our privie Councill But lykewayes the said Alexander Davidsone ought to be punished to the terror of others to Committ the like in tyme coming as also Alexander Davidsone Decerned in Three thousand merks for the Complainers Damnages and expenses, and Seeing he has of Sett purpose cited severall persons particularlie Mr William Gordon in Towie Robert Gordon his Brother […] Bruce as pretended accomlpices of Design to exclude them from being witnesses for the Complainers tho they be at most the messengers assistants in execution of his office and consequently habill witnesses of his being deforced. And anent with certification as in the said lybell of Reconvention at more length is contained, Which two Lybells being upon the twentie third of november instance called in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill and the said Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoune of now of Geicht persuar in the principall Lybell and Defender in the Reconvention Compearing personally at the Barr with Sir David Cunninghame Sir John Ferguson Mr William Black Mr James Stewart Mr Thomas Hope Mr George and Mr James Dalrymples his Advocats and the saids Defenders in the principall lybell two wherof are persuars in the Reconvention COmpearing also personally at the Barr with Mr David Forbes Mr Mungo Carnagie Mr Francis Grant and Master James Grahame their advocats the advocats for the Defenders in the principall cause Gave in the answers following to the principall Lybell viz: The Lybell raised by Geicht against Coubairdie and Master Duff being So extravagantly groundless that on the contrary they had the best reason to have been the first Complainers, it may be requisite to premise some view of the true matter of fact, The estate of Geicht was formerly in the name of Gordon, and the old Lady with assistance of friends particularly of Cowbairdie having retreived it from Sinking Burdens Mr Davidson (whose Father is rich) suited in marriage the heirs of Gight, and (in the contract of marriage) upon the old Ladies making over her rights to her Daughter and her appearand husband he and his Father become obliedged to relieve the old Lady of the Debts which She had undertaken for the family, when the marriage had once followed Mr Davidsone now of Gicht and his Father forget to pay the Debts that the old Lady might be Stressed for them, and least they Should be charged on the Contract for her relief they (under pretence of friendship and Communing) prevail with Cowbairdie to gett from him the old Ladies Double of the Contract which he had borrowed from her upon receipt, and once having gott it would never restore it, notwtisthanding of all the argyments of intreaty and honour for doing that justice, In the mean tyme the old Lady and Major Generall Buchan her husband (being Stressed for great Debts of the family and wanting to Contract which was the mean of their Relief) obtain two Decreits of Exhibition of this Contract in foro againest Cowbairdie on the last wherof he was taken by Caption be Mr Duff messenger in September last while Cowbairdie was in the Messengers hands at Milton of Fyvie in his way to prison Gight (whose house is only some miles distant from that place) comes to them and pretending the greatest Concern imaginable that Cowbairdie Should Suffer upon his account, prevailes with Mr Duff that he Should go and interceed with the old Lady and her Husband (who also were not far from that place) to give a fortnights forbearance to Cowbairdie upon the said Gights being obliedged under whatever penalty to Registrat the Contract in the mean tyme or otherwayes to present the prisoner, Mr Duff leaving Cowbairdie on parroll of honour not to escape goes and obtains the old Ladies consent to which her husband agreed, But on his return to Miltoun of Fyvie, Gight revokes all that he had promised when he found that the proposall had been accorded to, In the mean tyme Patrik Gordon a Creditor of the family, and nephew to Cowbairdie having accidentally arrived at that place and fearing that Gight who would not perform for Cowbairdie what was So easily in his power, would much less pay ane ordinary Debt of the family he thus abstracting the Contract which obliedged him therunto, as also ther being a rumour that the forsaid Contract was Destroyed the said Patrick Gordon being Creditor of the family and having obtained Decreit had a Caption againest Gight for about one hunder pound Sterling, calls Mr Duff the messenger aside puts the Caption in his hand, and orders him to doe his Duty in putting the Same in execution least ther might not be Such opportunitie therafter for Gight had formerlie fled into England for eviting these Debts, that the old Ladie and her husband might be forced to pay them, Mr Duff the messenger could not refuse master Gordons imployment but in the mean tyme ther is a message as from the young Lady Gight that if the Company would come with her husband to the house, the whole matter might be accomodat upon which Mr Duff ventured to carrie Cowbairdie his prisoner thither upon Saturdayes afternoone, but when come ther Gight would give nothing except an appearance of a kindly intertainment, wherupon Gight going out with them to horse, Mr Duff the messenger (fearing that he might be lyable for the Debt if he did not take Gight who might again runn into England) in her Majesties name3 executs Mr Gordons Caption against Gight, who offered to resist by drawing his Sword and calling to his Servants, But that Deforcement becoming ineffectuall the two prisoners are carried back to Miltoun of Fyvie that Night, That Mr Gordons Caption was at first execute upon Saturday, and did not at all incroach upon the Sabbath day, being at most, but about ten of the Cloack can be proven by witnesses beyond exception, Which Gight forseeing he has for Smotherin the truth if it were possible by his packt witnesses; pretended to Cite as pairties the Defenders most necessary witnesses, which abuse no doubt the Honorable Councill will redress, However the next day being the Sabbath, and that place of Miltoune of Fivy being within Gights own lands, wher the Tennents upon pretence of going to Church might conveen, and make a Disturbance for their Masters Liberation, Mr Duff the messenger did prudently, and necessarly go forward with his prisoners prisoners to the next Inns which was not far off, allowing to Gight to wear a Sword Still after the night of his first Capture, and ther they rested till the Sabbath was over, at Gights intreatie, not to be carried to prison he was continued for Munday and Tuesday that he might send for his friends, who having come to Towie (the place of tryst) they offer a totall accommodation, not only as to Mr Gordons Debt, but lykewise for Cowbairdies Releasment that being a fitt opportunitie for effectuating what Gights honour so much stood bound for, besides his legall obliedgment especially such persons of honour being present as the Earle of Aberdeen and his son my Lord Haddo who did interpose wherupon its agreed that the Earle of Abredein Should pay Mr Gordons Debt, and that George Davidsone of Carnbroge Gights uncle Should be Cautioner, that the Contract Should be registrat and the old Lady Gight with her Husbands Discharge of the exhibition should be obtained to Cowbairdie under Such penalties as were competent wher ther had been so manie former Disappointments, as also Gight did undertake the payment of the Missengers Dues both for the Caption againest himself and the other which had been execute againest himself and the other which had been execute againest Cowbairdie on his Default and account upon which both prisoners were dismissed, and Gight therafter homologat the agreement, by causing actually registrat the Contract and offer payment of the expensses, But upon inspection of the principall Contract in the Register, it being discovered that ther was a most criminall vitiation made therin Gight and his Fathers bethink themselves how to ballance or Drown the clamour heirof, and the method they fall upon is, That they raise a Councill complaint lybelling on unwarrantable executing of a Caption upon the Sabbath morning, a riotous convocation of the Leiges and extortion of Bonds and Concluding that these Should be given back and the actors punished especially with paying of a vast damnages and lest any might be left to witnes the falsehood of these stories, Gight the pursuer calls as pairties not only the Messengers assistants, which he ordinarly carries with him, but likewise the other Gentlemen who were were accidentally present, yea, even Mr William Gordon in Towie, tho he was imployed as a Communer for Gight himselfe against which Cowbairdie and Mr Duff having raised a Reconvention on Deforcement withdrawing of wryts oppression and treachery, It is answered for the Defenders to the pursuers libell, that the Same is denyed as most calumnious in all the Circumstances and qualifications therof that have the least shaddow of relevancie in them the true matter of fact being as is above represented, viz: That the first capture was not upon the Sabbath day, which as it is not presumed, so that necessary witnesses being first past from, as pairties, or cleared, it is offered to be proven to have been upon Saturday, That nothing followed therafter, except what was necessary to repell the pursuers Deforcement, or requisit to secure him against making escape, That as a Messenger dared not refuse to do his Duty, when any of the Leiges charged him with a Caption, so it is most false that Gight was Detained prisoner after the money was payed, yea he was totallie dismissed before a farthing of it was payed, which was not till some dayes therafter, That ther was no extortion in obtaining the forsaids obliegements, but on the contrary as they were congruous and just in themselves, So they were proposed by the pursuer and his friends and have been homologat after his freedome as said is, which matter is depending befor the Lords of Session, that the Defenders are so farr from being Injurers that they are the only persons injured in the caise, For Cowbairdie by all the rules of honour honesty and Law ought not to have been betrayed to trouble, Expences of plea and prison, upon Gights account when Gight putting his hand in his pocket to give out the Contract (which was most unjustly retained againest faith and right given) would have put an end to the business and Mr Duff notwithstanding of his pains in procuring the old Ladies consent to Gights own overture, and his hazard in venturing to Gights own house ere the accomodation should quite break up, and his lenity and discretion therafter intreating Gight as a Gentleman and indulging him Severall dayes from being carried to prison in presentia amicorum for ending the bussiness, Is ill rewarded by Defamation Diversion and Charges of this most groundless and absurd pursuit, and the advocats for the forsaid Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoune now of Gight pursuer in the principall lybell and Defender in the Reconvention Gave in the answers following to the forsaids letters of reconvention, Bearing the said James Hamiltone and John Duff with others their accomplices being conveened before the privy Councill, at the instance of the said Alexander Davidsone for a most atrocious Ryot and manifest oppression upon the account of assaulting and attacking the said Alexander Davidsone in his house of Gight under Cloud and Silence of night by way of hamesucken, and putting a pretended Caption in execution againest him on the Lords day, and carrying him from one place to another and detaining him as in private prison and extorting from him an accepted precept for twentie peices to the Messenger after the Debt was paid, as also extorting from him bonds for great Sums of money in relation to other things that had no concern with the Caption, the said James Hamiltoun and John Duff has raised a most Groundless and calumnious Reconvention, and first wheras it is alleadged that the said John Duff having apprehended the said Alexander Davidsone with Caption at the instance of Patrick Gordon merchant in Aberdeen, upon Saturday the Sixteenth of September last, at the said Alexander Davidsons house of Gight, he, by himself with drawen sword, and his servants did deforce or offer to deforce the Messenger, It is answered primo, That as it is false in fact, that the said Alexander Davidsone did deforce the messenger with a drawn Sword, So that it is nowayes Competent, nor can the said Defence be admitted being Contrar to the said Alexander Davidsons Lybell which bears that the said James Hamiltoun and Duff the messenger having come to his house about ten of the Cloack at Night, they were most kyndly entertained at Supper albeit they did most barbarously and treacherously abuse and maletreat the said Alexander Davidsone in his house in manner mentioned in his own Lybell, contrair to all the rules of friendship and hospitality, Secundo if the said Alexander Davidson had drawn his Sword and offered any violence to the messenger as he did not, yet he might lawfullie have done it in his own Defence, Seeing it is positively offered to be proven, as is mentioned in his Lybell that Duff the Messenger did not offer to put the Caption in execution till two of the cloack in the Sunday morning at which tyme it was most unjust and unlawfull for him to have put any legall diligence in execution, and consequently he might be lawfullie resisted, and the said Alexander Davidson might justly have opposed the Messengers illegall violence by force, Tertio that alternative, that the said Alexander Davidson and his servants did offer to deforce the messenger is no wayes relevant for a pretended offer to do a crime is no cryme when the offer did not take effect, Secundo wheras it was aleladged that the said Alexander Davidsone had raised a Councill complaint againest the said James Hamilton and Duff the Messenger which is Said to be groundless and false in all its articles, It was answered that this being but a deniall of Alexander Davidsons lybell, and nothing againest the Relevancy the lybell ought to be admitted to his probation, and he positivly offered to prove the Same, Tertio wheras it was alleadged as an aggravation that ther being a Contract of marriage betwixt the said Alexander Davidson and the heretrix of Gight by which he and his Father were obliedged to releive the old Lady Gight of the Debts of the family the said James Hamilton having borrowed the Double of that Contract from the old Lady, and lent it to the said Alexander Davidsone or his Father, wherupon the old Lady and Major Generall Buchan her Husband were distressed for many Debts of the family, and they having obtained Decreit againest the Said James Hamilton for exhibiting and delivering of the Said Contract, and yet notwithstanding the Said Alexander Davidson doth Still retain the Samen, and at last the said James Hamilton being taken with Caption and in his way to prison having called at the said Alexander Davidsone house upon the Sixteenth of December last, and Duff the Messenger taking the opportunity to execute ane other Caption againest the Said Alexander Davidson he the Said Alexander did conveen the Said James Hamiltoun in the Councill Complaint againest the Messenger and others, It was answered that the said pretended aggravation was altogether groundless, for First It was most calumnious that either the said Alexander Davidsone or his Father did borrow the Said Contract from James Hamiltown, Secundo albeit the Said Alexander Davidson had the Said Contract in his Custodie, and that the old Lady Gight had obtained a Decreit againest James Hamiltoun for exhibition and delivery therof yet neither Alexander Davidson nor his Father were any wayes concerned in that matter, Tertio as to what was lybelled in relation to the said Alexander Davidson or his Father having of the Contract and ther not giving it up to the said James Hamilton It was properly a matter of civill right, and did not inferr any cryme and so could not be Sustained So much as ane aggravation of the said James Hamilton and Duff the messengers groundless Complaint Quarto what was mentioned in the said James Hamilton and Duffs Lybell in Relation to the Said Contract is altogether extrinsick to said Alexander Davidsons complaint againest them, which is for a manifest ryot, violence and oppression for albeit the said Alexander Davidson had keeped up the said Contract, yet that was no ground for the said James Hamilton, but a great aggravation of their cryme to have concurred with Duff the Messenger, to put the Caption for a Debt in execution at an unlawfull tyme and to beat and abuse the said Alexander Davidson in his own house, which was his Sanctuary, especially after they had been so civilly and kyndly intertained by him the night before, far less that he Should have concurred with the Messenger to extort from the Said Alexander an accepted precept to the Messenger, upon the pretences of expences after the Debt was payed, and by force and violence to have extorted bonds for exhibiting and delivery of the said Contract upon great penalties ther being no Sentences or Dilligences againest him for that effect, and the said Mr William Gordon of Towie Robert Gordon his Brother and […] Bruce are justly conveened as pairties who not only concurred as Accomplices with the Said James Hamilton and Duff, but also were the principall actors who attacked the said Alexander Davidson with cocked pistolls, and laid violent hands on him and beat him to the effusion of his blood, brook his sword in the scabbert and threatned to tread him under their feet, so that the said James Hamilton and Duff the messenger and ther saids accomplices being guilty of a most attrocious ryot, violence and oppression committed by them upon the person of the said Alexander Davidson, and art and part of the Samen in manner lybelled the said Alexander Davidsons Complaint ought to be admitted to probation, and he assoilzied from the said James Hamilton and Duff the messengers groundless and calumnious complaint, as the said answers bears, And the forsaid principall Lybell with the answers made therto by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger with the forsaid Lybell of Reconvention and answers made therto by the said Alexander Davidson being all read in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, and both pairties Lawiers heard at the Barr and removed, The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by their Interloquitor the twentie third day of november instant admitted the Lybells to probation, and the witnesses for both pairties being called Such of them as are marked in the roll present Compeiring at the Barr Did make faith, The Councill nominats and appoints the Earles of Lauderdale Leven and Northesk Collingtoun and the Lord provost of Edinburgh to be a Committie to examine the witnesses, and Recommends to the said Committy to meet to morrow morning at ten acloack in the fornoon and Declares any three a quorum and to report, and grants to both pairties Letters of Second dilligence by Caption againest the absent witnesses as marked in the roll and not Compeiring, and assignes the […] day of […] next to come for that effect, But in respect the pursuer in the principall Lybell who is Defender in the Reconvention hes Cited the persons following as pairties in his principall Lybell, who are cited as witnesses for the saids pursuars in the Reconvention therby to prevent ther being adduced as necessary witnesses therin viz Master William Gordon in Towie Mr Francis Bruce merchant in Edinburgh Robert Gordon in Kinghorne John Broun his Servant Robert Watt Servitor to Patrick Gordon of Samphfoord Merchant in Aberdein Andrew Muir and Patrick Wilsone Servitors to the said John Duff, Therfore the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill Doe heirby Recommend to the Said Committy to receive the oaths and testimonies of Such witnesses as the pursuer in the principall Lybell Shall condescend on for proving the fornamed persons or any of them pairties in his principall lybell, and in caice no probation or evidence appear againest them or any of them to be pairtties, that then the said Committy receive them as witnesses for the pursuars in the Reconvention who are Defenders in the principall Lybell, and purge them of partiall Councill and malice and ordains the witnesses cited for the pursuar in the principall lybell to be at Liberty and have their full freedome, and the said Committie or their quorum having mett upon the twentie fourth day of November instant and having called in one of Gights Witnesses who being Solemnlie Sworn purged of partiall Councill and interrogat Deponed as his Deposition extant in proces bears. Therafter ther being objections offered by the Defenders in the principall lybell againest Some others of Gights witnesses which the Committie referred to the Councill, Ther was a memoriall given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by the said Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun now of Gight, Narrating as follow’s in the proces depending befor the privie Councill att the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newyoun now of Gight againest the said James Hamilton John Duff Mr William and Robert Gordons […] Bruce and others Their Lordships appoynted a Committie to examine the witnesses upon the lybell, and in caise by the probation the Committie Should find, that nothing was proven againest the said Mr William and Robert Gordons or […] Bruce that than the Committie Should admitt them as witnesses in the Reconvention, The Committie having mett, and the witnesses being called in, it was objected that […] Gights Gardner and […] his servants could not be admitted as witnesses in regard ther was not a penurie of witnesses, ther being many more who could prove the Lybell, that were present, and more habite witnesses and it being answered, that the Cryme being4 committed at Gights house in the Dead and Silence of the Night, ther is none that could be witnesses, but Such as lived at the Gates, or were his Domesticks, The Committie inclined to examine the witnesses, But the Defenders were So tenacious, as to plead that the Committie would report the objection to the Councill, which they acquiesced to do next Councill day, Their Lordships are therfor humbly desired to Consider that its impossible for Gight to prove his Lybell, but by those verie persons who live at his Gates, or in his house, ther being none else present at his maletreatment but the Defenders themselves, who are conveened by him, and as to the pretence that ther are severall other witnesses cited, these witnesses are such who can only prove the detaining of Gight prisoner, and carrying of him from place to place on the Sabbath day, and the other articles lybelled, but were not present when he was first apprehended, Especially Seeing that it is a certain rule in Law, that any mans Servants may be admitted witnesses in Domestick Crimes, in that case they being necessary witnesses, as for instance, if any man Should be assasinat in his house, the only proper witnesses that could prove this are his Servants, and in the case of hamsucken, when any man is assaulted in his house under cloud and silence of Night as this was, it is the constant practice both befor the Councill and justice Court, to allow Servants to be admitted witnesses both men and women, because in that case they are absolutly necessary witnesses, and the particulars lybelled in this Complaint, upon which the Crime principally depends, was the assaulting and attacking Gight at his house and Gate under cloud and silence of night, as the said Memoriall bears, Lykeas ther was objections given in by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff, againest Richard Melvill William Henrie, and Jannet Black witnesses offered by Alexander Davidson of Gight in his proces befor the privie Councill, againest them, Representing as follows, The honorable Lords might well remember that it was plead for Cowbairdie and Mr Duff who are the persons only aimed at by the pursuer, that he had industriously cited all the Gentelmen and their Servants, who were accidentally ther as pairties therby to deprive the Saids Cowbairdie and Mr Duff of the benefite of their Depositions in their Exculpation, and this contrivance did plainly appear by their Conduct before the Comity for when Gights oath of Calumnie was Demanded by the forsaid Gentlemens Procurators the Parties themselves also Urging it, he did absolutly Shift and Declyne to give it alleading that it was not Compitent to crave his oath of Calumnie their, it not haveing been craved at the Councill and that the Councill only Could ordain him to Give his oath of Calumnie although it be Against all reason that any person Should pretend to prove a crime against his Nighbour without purging himself of Calumnie and the Law allows of that oath In ay pairt of the proces the nixt Stept he makes he offers his own Meniall and Domestick servants as witnesses, againest whom it was objected, that they being Miniall servants, the Law did reprobate their Testimonies, and being replyed, that servants are admitted in Domestick Crimes, which was the pursuars case, The pretended illegall Caption being in his own house under Cloud of night, and therfor could only be proven by his servants and family, To which it was answered that the priviledge of receiving unhabill witnesses Such as Servants in Domestick Crimes, is only admitted in the case when ther is no other habill and unsuspect witnesses present, than all the men servants he offers so that he can never be allowed to prove an pretended Crime againest Gentlemen, alleadged committed on him at his own gate, by his Domesticks, when the said Crime was alleadged by himselfe to be committed on him at his own gate in the Sight of five habil and indifferent witnesses, three of whom viz Adam Panton in Little Gight […] Cassie in Stonhouse of Gight, and […] Davidsone of Cairnbrogie Uncle to Gight, are witnesses beyond exception and ther being on the other hand five more cited by Cowbairdie in his exculpation, besides Mr Duffs assistance, viz Mr William Gordon in Towie, Robert Gordon in Kinghorny Francis Bruce Merchant in Edinburgh, Robert Watt, Servitor to Patrick Gordon of Sandfoord, and John Broun Servitor to the above designed Robert Gordon all persons present at the pretended ryot, besides Mr Duff and his ordinary assistants and witnesses all which persons of integrity and knowen Reputation are cited by the pursuar as pairties and accessaries to the pretended ryot, although they had no manner of accession therto, on purpose to preclude the Defenders from the benefite of their Depositions, and would prove the forsaid pretended accession by Domesticks, which the Law does Still reprobate, except in the caise wher ther are no other witnesses present, This was not a Domestick Crime that was lybelled, but the question was anent the legallity of the executing of the Caption in which the messenger and his witnesses in the execution are testes instrumentury et necessary, and therfor they can never be casten as pairtties and the pursuars design of making the whole persons present who are cited for the Defender pairties, except his own Uncle, and his obstinatly refusing at the Committie, to allow any of the unsuspect and habile witnesses to Depone and Shifting and refusing to purge himself of Calumnies is so evident a Contrivance that it is confidently hoped that the Lords of Councill will never allow any of his Domesticks to Depone, in respect ther are four or five unsuspect habill witnesses present at the pretended ryot, and who are cited by the pursuar himselfe, as the saids objections also bears which memoriall and objections being upon the twentie eight day of november instant read in presence of the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, and they having considered the same The Saids Lords appoynted and ordained the said Alexander Davidson of Newtoun to give his oath of Calumnie in the said proces befor the said Committie and therafter Recommends to the Said Committie formerly appoynted therin to examine Adam Panton in Little Gight, and […] Davidson in Carnbrogie witnesses for the said Davidson of Gight, and in case it appear by ther oaths and testimonies that they were present all the tyme lybelled than the saids Lords have found and heirby finds that ther is no penury of witnesses, and that Gights miniall and Domestick servants ought not to be received as witnesses for him in the forsaid proces, But in caice it do not appear, appoynts his Domestick Servants to be received and Recommends to the said Committie to meet to morrow at eleven acloack in the fornoon and to report, and the said Committie or their quorum having mett upon the twentie ninth of november instant, Did first of all in obedience to the forsaid Interloquitor take the said Alexander Davidsone of Gight his oath of Calumnie, as the Samen extant in proces bears. And therafter called for another of Gights witnesses, who being solemnlie sworn purged of partiall Councill and malice Deponed as his Deposition extant in proces also bears, Therafter the said Committie conforme to the two severall remitts to them theranent having examined Robert Mitchell in Ellon and Adam Panton in Little Gight and have considered their Depositions they are of opinion that the saids two witnesses proved nothing against Mr William Gordon in Towie Francis Bruce son to the Deceast Alexander Bruce in Birne, and the rest of the Defenders who are cited as pairties in the principall lybell and witnesses in the Reconvention to make them pairties (except only against the person aftermentioned) and that the said persons cited as pairties in the principall lybell ought to be received as witnesses in the Reconvention for Cowbairdie and Mr Duff, except only that the saids two witnesses prove something againest Robert Gordon Brother to the said Master William, But how far that can make him a pairtie the Committy Remitts the Consideration therof to the Councill and appoynts Cowbairdie and John Duffs witnesses to be receieved the morrow att ten a Cloack in the fornoon and are of opinion that ther is no penury of witnsses, and accordingly the Said Committie having mett this Day and called for severall of Cowbairdies and John Duffs witnesses, who Compeared and being solemnlie sworn purged of partiall Councill and interrogat upon their great oaths Deponed as their Depositions extant in proces lykewise bears. Therafter ther being a petition lykewayes presented to the Saids Lords by Alexander Davidson of Gight, Shewing that when the Complaint at the petitioners instance againest Cowbairdie, Mr Duff and their Accomplices, and the Reconvention at their instance againest me were read and Debate in their Lordships presence, that which the petitioner endeavoured to obviat was that Cowbairdie and Mr Duffs Servants and those other Accomplices who came along with them to his house Should not be admitted witnesses againest him being actuallie pairties and conveened as Such, Their Lordships pronounced a most just interloquitor in Relation to this poynt viz that his witnesses Should be first examined as to what they knew of Mr William and Robert Gordons and Francis Bruce ther actings or assistance in this matter, and if any thing were proven againest them they were not to be admitted as witnesses in the Reconvention, and if nothing were proven than they were to be Receaved when in the terms of this Interloquitor, the petitioner and his procurators Compeared befor the Commity wher the witnesses being to be examined, he did condescend on Such witnesses, first to be examined as he thought would be probation againest the saids masters Gordons and Bruce, against which witnesses Cowbairdie and Mr Duff did object that they were his own servants and therfor could not be received, but did urge that other witnesses whom they had cited might be examined, Wherupon Robert Mitchell on of his witnesses was called who being examined deponed somethings in relation to what happened at Gights gates the tyme lybelled and about the tyme of night but did not See all the particulars condescended on, nor know the Defenders except Robert Gordon, and Francis Bruce, as to whom he Depones on Some particulars as by his oath in the Clerks hands will appear, He being then obliedged to desyre his own Servants Should be examined, Because he knew ther were none other of his witnesses that could prove any thing againest those persons first to be considered, and therupon my procurators did make ane answer to the objection made againest them, viz that it was a Crime done done5 in the night time, and at his own gate wher ther was ane evident penury of witnesses none being present but the actors of the Crime and his own Servants, which the Lords of the Committie being pleased to report to their Lordships the matter was ordered to this effect that he Should give his oath of Calumnie as to the lybell againest Mrs William Robert Gordons and Bruce, and than their Lordships Recommends it to the Lords of the Committy to call and examine Adam Panton in Little Gight, and George6 Davidson of Cairnbrogie two of his witnesses and in case by their Depositions the Lords of the Committie Should find that they were both present at all the actions lybelled, Then their Lordships fand no penury and therfor his Servants not to be received, But in caice by their Depositions it Should appear they were not present, Than their Lordships as witnesses, In obedience to which interloquitor the Lords of the Committy having mett and examined Adam Panton the first witnes condescended on in the last Interloquitor who indeed did appear to be present at all the transactions lybelled, except that he was in the Stable, when John Duff, first Seased me, as his Deposition in the Clerks hands will testifie, Kairnbrogie being the nixt witnes condescended on He was called for whom a testificat was produced upon soul and conscience by phisitians and a minister that he was not able to come up, and farder upon his application the pursuars did judicially acknowledge that altho he were present he could prove nothing as to the Crimes committed at my gate at the tyme lybelled in regard he was in his bed befor they came to Gight and the tyme they went away, Wherupon I did expect that the alternative of their Lordships interloquitor was to take place so that his Servants Should be called and received, But in place therof the Lords of the Committie were pleased to find ther was no penury And therfore none of his miniall servants was to be received, and furder fand nothing was proven by his two witnesses examined againest Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce to inferr the Crimes lybelled, and therfor allowed them to be examined as witnesses in the Reconvention, wheranent they gave in a memoriall to the saids Lords of the Commity representing what was abovementioned, and Craving they would be7 pleased to reconsider their Interloquitor, to which they were pleased to give them this answer that they were not inclined to alter their Interloquitor But did allow them to apply to their Lordships and therupon Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce were examined, He is not at present to Complain upon the Honorable Lords of the Committy their Interloquitor and examining Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce he most begg leave to represent to their Lordships that his servants may be allowed to prove severall points of his lybell committed at his own gate againest the other Defenders Since these two alreadie examined are ignorant of several points therof, and its humbly contended that this is most agrieable to their Lordships former Interloquitor anent ther being examined, and were a great hardship upon their petitioners if the Same were not allowed Since the penury is evident these two alreadie deponing being almost in the Same caise as his own Servants the one of them to witt Mr Panton being his tennant and daylie attendant, and the other his Uncles Servant who was accidentally ther, and by their Depositions it will appear ther were severall things they were ignorant of, so that if the Defenders had not knowen that they would have objected againest them as well as the rest, and then he Should have been allowed no witnesses at all, and consequently no Crimes of the like nature could be proven but by the soiy criminis, which would be a most Dangerous consequence, And lastly what ever may be pretended againest his Deomstick Servants yet that can never exclude William Hendry his Gardner who hes a Distinct family of his own a peice distant from his house only labours his yards, and a little peice of ground to his own use in possesion wherof he has continued for fourteen years bypast and never received his entertainment in his family So that to exclude him were to frustrat him of all kind of probation which it is hoped their Lordships justice will not allow, and therfore Creaving their Lordships to consider the premisses and to allow the Committy to examine his haill other witnesses cited againest Cowbairdy and Mr Duff at least so many of them as their Lordships Shall think fitt, as the said petition bears And ther being lykewayes another petition given in and presented to the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger, Shewing that wher the petitioners were most unjustly persewed at the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun and now of Gight befor their Lordships for alleadged illegall and inhumane seizing of him in his house with Caption upon the seventeenth of September being Sundays morning after he had kyndlie entertained them in his house at Supper, In which most ungrate and calumnious Lybell he cites the haill Gentlemen and their Servants that were present as pairties and accessories to the pretended Crime on direct purpose to preclude their petitioners from proving of their Defence of exculpation and Recrimination, which being taken notice of in the pleading befor their Lordships They did most justly to Disapoint the pursuars their Designe appoynt the pursuar first to insist againest the Gentlemen and others Cited in their Reconvention, to the effect that if it did appear to the Lords of the Committie, that they had no accession to the said pretended Crime and violence they might be received witnesses in the Reconvention And accordingly the Committie having mett and taken the Deposition of one Mitchell who Deponed that he saw none of the witnesses cited in their Reconvention offer any violence to the said Laird of Gight, althrough he was present at the tyme of the said Capture and knew the said persons Gight did therafter offer to adduce his own servants as witnesses, and it being objected that they could not be received, as being inhabite by Law and it being replyed that the Cryme lybelled being Domestick Servants were priviledged as necessary witnesses, To which it being Duplyed that althroug Servants were admitted in Domestick Crimes yet that was only when the crime was Committed by Surprize on the family when ther were no other free and habite witnesses present, but, here the persons were Invited to Gights own house, and ther were other habite and unsuspect witnesses present, Therfor the servants could not be admitted, This objection being reported to their Lordships by the president of the Committy, their Lordships found that if ther were two free unsuspect witnesses who could Depone they were present, and that they Saw no violence Committed by the witnesses cited in the Reconvention, That ther Domesticks Should not be admitted, but that the witnesses Cited in the Reconvention Should be received although cited by the pursuar as pairties, The Lords of Committie did proceed according to their Lordships Recomendation and examined Adam Panton in Little Gight a person who was imployed by Gight himself in the whole matter who concurred with the former witnesses adduced by the pursuar, That he Saw no violence committed or offered by the witnesses Cited in the Reconvention to the Laird of Gight, and that they were present at the tyme of Mr Duffs seizing of the Laird of Gight, on the Caption lybelled on by the pursuers The Committie having Considered the two positive Depositions of the habile and unsuspect witnesses They did in the terms of their Lordships Recommendation find that the forsaid Gentlemen witnesses cited in the Reconvention were cleared from anie accession of the forsaid pretended Crime and refused to admitt the forsaid Domesticks as witnesses againest them, and admitted the witnesses cited by them, to depon, and They accordingly adduced Three, vis: Mr William Gordon a persone imployed as Mediator in the whole matter by Gight himself Mr Francis Bruce Merchant in Edinburgh a meer stranger in that Countrey who accidentally mett with them at Miltoun of Fyvie, and had not So much as acquaintance with anie of the pairties, and also Robert Watt servitor to Samfoord by whose Depositions, the whole tract and serious of this affair is made so evident and clear that Its humbly hoped their Lordships will See nothing remain upon the parte of the pursuar but the utmost ingratitude, Clamour Calumnie and unjustice, and their Lordships will also see by the Depositions that the Caption was also execute betwixt ten and eleven, and that the Samen was therafter Satisfied and transacted in the presence of the Right Honorable persons afternamed, viz The Earle of Aberdein and the Lord Haddo one of their Lordships number whose presence does exclude all pretence of force or extortion, and does Demonstrat the greatest Calumnie of this after pursuite, Their Lordships petitioners have severall other witnesses but Seeing the matter So fully cleared already, and Seeing the proces has been so grievous and expensive to them, and that the high Ingratitude and Injustice their petitioners have met with by the said Gight in all this matter, They humbly hope and begg their Lordships will instantly advise the probation, And therfor Craving their Lordships Seriously to consider the forsaid probation with the haill serious and tract of this affair and to modifie a sume of money to be payed to them for their expences and Damnadge which are verie great and heavie the said Injurious proces having been extreamly prejudiciall to them in asbtracting them from their necessars and important affairs, and otherwayes punish the pursuar as their Lordships In justice Shall think proper for preventing of Such gross oppression in time comeing, as the said petition lykewayes bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having this day proceeded to advyse, the mutuall proceses at the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun now of Gight, againest Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger et e contra and the lybells principall and Reconvention with answers therto and petitions by both pairties with the Depositions of the witnesses adduced for either pairtie in the said proces being all read, and the saids Lords having considered the same, Have found and heirby Finds the principall lybell at the instance of the said Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun not proven, and have Assoilzied and heirby assoilzies the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger and other Defenders therin from the haill poynts and articles therof, and have Declared and heirby Declares them quyt therof and free therfrae in all tyme coming and have Found and heirby Finds the forsaid lybell of Reconvention raised at the instance of the said James Hamiltoun of Cowbairdie and John Duff againest the said Alexander Davidsone Sufficiently proven, and both pairties being called into the barr The Lord Marques of Annandale Lord president of privie Councill Did intimat the Samen to them accordingly.

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/131

Decreet

Decreit absolvitor John Duff and others against Davidsone of Newtoune

Anent the principall lybell or letters of Complaint raised and persewed befor the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill at the instance of Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun now of Geight, with concourse of Sir James Stewart Her Majesties advocat for her Highness interest, Makeing Mention that where by the Lawes of this and all other well governed Realms the publict peace ought to be be2 observed and all persons secure under the faith therof and protection of the Government, and that for any to brake the same by attacking and assaulting or injuring any other in their person or goods specially when done under a pretence and collour of friendship and a pretext of Law and legall dilligence and also on the Lords day when all execution even through legall ought to cease Is a high Cryme and ought to be Severly punished and the persone injured aught also to be restored and reponed againest all the effects and consequences therof Nevertheless It is of verity that James Hamilton of Cupbardie Mr William Gordon in Towie Robert Gordon his Brother […] Bruce and […] their servants and accomplices and John Duff messenger and […] Servitor to the Said John Duff Shaking off all regaird to our authority and Laws coming upon the Sixteenth of September last being Saturday at ten acloack at night to the house of Geicht, as if they had been friends and in a peaceable manner, were ther kyndlie entertained at Supper But after they had Stayed till two acloack on Sunday morning being the seventeenth of the said moneth and would needs be gone the Complainer did in Civility convoy them to their horses and than and ther the said James Hamiltoun of Cupbardie with Duff the messenger and other persons abovenamed Drew and cockt their pistolls and the messenger told Geicht that he was his prisoner at Patrick Gordons instance, Wherupon they all laid hold on him and took his sword from him braking it in the scabard and beat him to the great effusion of his bloud and the said Cupbardie threatned to Shoot on of Geichts Servants who offered to rescue him from their violence, and the saids persons having taken Geicht thus illegally on the Lords Day and violently and treacherously in manner forsaid They carried him as a prisoner all the Lords Day without regaird to the Divyne Service from place to place, and the said Cupbardie being Factor for the estate of Towie Did unlawfully Convocat the Tennents of Towie in arm’s to Destroy the Complainer, and thus carried him from one ale house to another Drinking Still on his Charges They keept him untill he gott a friend to pay the Debt in their pretended Caption, But when the Debt in the Caption was payed the said Messenger Duff would not pairt with the Complainer untill he extorted from him ane accepted bill of twentie pounds for his own Charges and when this was done the said Cupbardie told the Complainer (through he had not any ground or warrant for it) that he was Still his prisoner and Swore many bloody oaths he would not pairt with him but carry him wher no friend Should ever hear of him, Unless he would grant a bond of the like soume to Major Generall Buchan that within fourtein dayes he Should Registrat his Double of ane Contract of marriage and deliver ane Extract therof to the major Generall, Wherby the Complainer being Surprized, and Seeing a great many armed men upon the adjacent raising grounds ready to assist Cupbardie; and the Major Generall telling him that if he refused what was Demanded worse things might fall out, the Complainer and his Uncle Carnbryie were therby by violence and fear forced to grant the saids two bonds Lykeas all the tyme the Complainer was kept by them in Custody as a prisoner, They guarded him night and day with bended pistolls, By all which it is evident the said Hamiltoune of Cupbardie Mr William Gordon in Towie and Robert Gordon his Brother with the other persons abovenamed and Duff the Messenger are all and each of them Guiltie airt and pairt of a violent breach of the peace and most attrocious ryot and oppression and of having Committed privatam Carcerem, and the other violences and injuries abovementioned Which being proven befor the Lords of our privie Councill They ought not only to be Decerned in the Soume of Three thousand punds Scots of Damnages and expenses and ordained to redeliver the forsaid accepted bill and two bonds wrongously extorted as said is to be Cancelled, But also they ought to be farder punished in their persons and goods for the Crymes abovementioned to the example and terror of others to Committ the like in tyme coming, And anent the Chairge given to the Said Defender to have Compeired personally befor the Saids Lords at ane certain day bygone to have answered to the points of the said Complaint, and to have heard and Seen Such order and course taken theranent as the said Lords Should think fitt with certification as in the principall lybell or letters of complaint at more lenth is contained, And alse Anent the Lybell of Reconvention purchast and raised befor the saids Lords of Her Majesties privie Councill at the instance of the saids James Hamiltoun of Cupbairdie and John Duff messenger with concourse of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat for her Highness interest Making mention that where by the Laws of this and all well governed Nations the deforcing or attempting to deforce Messengers in the lawfull execution of their office, and yet Notwithstanding therof the traduceing the said Messenger and his assistants for doing their Duty by most calumnious Complaints befor the Lords of our privie Councill, as also the withdrawing and abstracting of wryts of greatest importance or being airt and pairt therof against faith and trust given to the Contrary, wherupon the intruster is Subjected to personall execution and many other hardships, and likewayes the defaming of her Majesties Leidges who are of unquestionable reputation with the odious Crymes of oppression and abuse of the Lords day, and the putting of them to unnecessary trouble and expenses theranent are Crimes of a high nature and Severly punishable, and the persons so injured ought to be redressed, Nevertheless It is of verity that Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun and now of Geicht is guilty of the forsaid Delinquencies insofarr as that the Complainer the said John Duff haveing upon the Sixteenth of September last being Saturday execute or offered to execute letters of Caption at the instance of Patrick Gordon merchant in Aberdein, in her Majesties name againest the said Alexander Davidsone He in Confidence of being at his own house of Gicht Did by himselfe with drawen Sword, and by his Servants Deforce or offer to Deforce this lawfull authoritie with violence and resistance as also the said Alexander Davidsone has taken the confidence to raise a Councill Complaint not only againest the said messenger but also against the Complainer the said James Hamiltoun of Copbairdie, which is most groundless and false in all the articles therof and which calumnie and Defamation is the more aggravat in regaird of the particulars following, Viz that the said Complainer hes been most notoriously abused by the said Alexander Davidsone his Father and others for his behove (with whom he is airt and pairt) insofarr as ther being a Contract of marriage betwixt the Said Alexander and the Heretrix of Gicht in which Alexander and his Father were bound to releive (upon a profitable translation) the old Lady Geicht, off the Debts of the family the Comapliner the said Hamiltoun of Cowbardie borroued the old Ladies Double of that Contract, and under the greatest appearance of friendship did Lend the Same to the said Alexander or his Father for his behove, Wherupon the old Ladie and Major Generall Buchan her husband being Distressed for many Debts of the family by Such Creditors as the said Alexander and his Father did most inhumanly hund out while they retained the Contract which obliedged them in relief of the Same as aforsaid having pursued the Complainer in ane Exhibition and obtained two Decreets in foro against the Complainer after he had made many instances to the said Alexander and his Father for freeing him by producing the forsaid Contract they most treacherously and ungratefully did keep the same up both from the Complainer and from the Major Generall and his Lady who prosecute the exhibition till at last the Complainer being taken with Caption and in his way to prison having called at the said Alexanders house on the Sixteenth day of September last (the Complainer being taken with Caption) in order to his make his last intreatie of his Liberating the Complainer by Delivering up the forsaid Contract and the Messenger who had the Complainer in Custody taking the opportunity of executing the forsaid Caption with which he was intrusted againest the said Alexander Davidsone at that tyme the said Alexander does most causelessly and absurdly make the Complainer a pairtie in his Councill complaint tho he had the best ground to be the first Complainer, and wes all along a prisoner himselfe and therfor the Complainer ought not only to be assolzied from the forsaid malicious complaint befor the Lords of our privie Councill But lykewayes the said Alexander Davidsone ought to be punished to the terror of others to Committ the like in tyme coming as also Alexander Davidsone Decerned in Three thousand merks for the Complainers Damnages and expenses, and Seeing he has of Sett purpose cited severall persons particularlie Mr William Gordon in Towie Robert Gordon his Brother […] Bruce as pretended accomlpices of Design to exclude them from being witnesses for the Complainers tho they be at most the messengers assistants in execution of his office and consequently habill witnesses of his being deforced. And anent with certification as in the said lybell of Reconvention at more length is contained, Which two Lybells being upon the twentie third of november instance called in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill and the said Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoune of now of Geicht persuar in the principall Lybell and Defender in the Reconvention Compearing personally at the Barr with Sir David Cunninghame Sir John Ferguson Mr William Black Mr James Stewart Mr Thomas Hope Mr George and Mr James Dalrymples his Advocats and the saids Defenders in the principall lybell two wherof are persuars in the Reconvention COmpearing also personally at the Barr with Mr David Forbes Mr Mungo Carnagie Mr Francis Grant and Master James Grahame their advocats the advocats for the Defenders in the principall cause Gave in the answers following to the principall Lybell viz: The Lybell raised by Geicht against Coubairdie and Master Duff being So extravagantly groundless that on the contrary they had the best reason to have been the first Complainers, it may be requisite to premise some view of the true matter of fact, The estate of Geicht was formerly in the name of Gordon, and the old Lady with assistance of friends particularly of Cowbairdie having retreived it from Sinking Burdens Mr Davidson (whose Father is rich) suited in marriage the heirs of Gight, and (in the contract of marriage) upon the old Ladies making over her rights to her Daughter and her appearand husband he and his Father become obliedged to relieve the old Lady of the Debts which She had undertaken for the family, when the marriage had once followed Mr Davidsone now of Gicht and his Father forget to pay the Debts that the old Lady might be Stressed for them, and least they Should be charged on the Contract for her relief they (under pretence of friendship and Communing) prevail with Cowbairdie to gett from him the old Ladies Double of the Contract which he had borrowed from her upon receipt, and once having gott it would never restore it, notwtisthanding of all the argyments of intreaty and honour for doing that justice, In the mean tyme the old Lady and Major Generall Buchan her husband (being Stressed for great Debts of the family and wanting to Contract which was the mean of their Relief) obtain two Decreits of Exhibition of this Contract in foro againest Cowbairdie on the last wherof he was taken by Caption be Mr Duff messenger in September last while Cowbairdie was in the Messengers hands at Milton of Fyvie in his way to prison Gight (whose house is only some miles distant from that place) comes to them and pretending the greatest Concern imaginable that Cowbairdie Should Suffer upon his account, prevailes with Mr Duff that he Should go and interceed with the old Lady and her Husband (who also were not far from that place) to give a fortnights forbearance to Cowbairdie upon the said Gights being obliedged under whatever penalty to Registrat the Contract in the mean tyme or otherwayes to present the prisoner, Mr Duff leaving Cowbairdie on parroll of honour not to escape goes and obtains the old Ladies consent to which her husband agreed, But on his return to Miltoun of Fyvie, Gight revokes all that he had promised when he found that the proposall had been accorded to, In the mean tyme Patrik Gordon a Creditor of the family, and nephew to Cowbairdie having accidentally arrived at that place and fearing that Gight who would not perform for Cowbairdie what was So easily in his power, would much less pay ane ordinary Debt of the family he thus abstracting the Contract which obliedged him therunto, as also ther being a rumour that the forsaid Contract was Destroyed the said Patrick Gordon being Creditor of the family and having obtained Decreit had a Caption againest Gight for about one hunder pound Sterling, calls Mr Duff the messenger aside puts the Caption in his hand, and orders him to doe his Duty in putting the Same in execution least ther might not be Such opportunitie therafter for Gight had formerlie fled into England for eviting these Debts, that the old Ladie and her husband might be forced to pay them, Mr Duff the messenger could not refuse master Gordons imployment but in the mean tyme ther is a message as from the young Lady Gight that if the Company would come with her husband to the house, the whole matter might be accomodat upon which Mr Duff ventured to carrie Cowbairdie his prisoner thither upon Saturdayes afternoone, but when come ther Gight would give nothing except an appearance of a kindly intertainment, wherupon Gight going out with them to horse, Mr Duff the messenger (fearing that he might be lyable for the Debt if he did not take Gight who might again runn into England) in her Majesties name3 executs Mr Gordons Caption against Gight, who offered to resist by drawing his Sword and calling to his Servants, But that Deforcement becoming ineffectuall the two prisoners are carried back to Miltoun of Fyvie that Night, That Mr Gordons Caption was at first execute upon Saturday, and did not at all incroach upon the Sabbath day, being at most, but about ten of the Cloack can be proven by witnesses beyond exception, Which Gight forseeing he has for Smotherin the truth if it were possible by his packt witnesses; pretended to Cite as pairties the Defenders most necessary witnesses, which abuse no doubt the Honorable Councill will redress, However the next day being the Sabbath, and that place of Miltoune of Fivy being within Gights own lands, wher the Tennents upon pretence of going to Church might conveen, and make a Disturbance for their Masters Liberation, Mr Duff the messenger did prudently, and necessarly go forward with his prisoners prisoners to the next Inns which was not far off, allowing to Gight to wear a Sword Still after the night of his first Capture, and ther they rested till the Sabbath was over, at Gights intreatie, not to be carried to prison he was continued for Munday and Tuesday that he might send for his friends, who having come to Towie (the place of tryst) they offer a totall accommodation, not only as to Mr Gordons Debt, but lykewise for Cowbairdies Releasment that being a fitt opportunitie for effectuating what Gights honour so much stood bound for, besides his legall obliedgment especially such persons of honour being present as the Earle of Aberdeen and his son my Lord Haddo who did interpose wherupon its agreed that the Earle of Abredein Should pay Mr Gordons Debt, and that George Davidsone of Carnbroge Gights uncle Should be Cautioner, that the Contract Should be registrat and the old Lady Gight with her Husbands Discharge of the exhibition should be obtained to Cowbairdie under Such penalties as were competent wher ther had been so manie former Disappointments, as also Gight did undertake the payment of the Missengers Dues both for the Caption againest himself and the other which had been execute againest himself and the other which had been execute againest Cowbairdie on his Default and account upon which both prisoners were dismissed, and Gight therafter homologat the agreement, by causing actually registrat the Contract and offer payment of the expensses, But upon inspection of the principall Contract in the Register, it being discovered that ther was a most criminall vitiation made therin Gight and his Fathers bethink themselves how to ballance or Drown the clamour heirof, and the method they fall upon is, That they raise a Councill complaint lybelling on unwarrantable executing of a Caption upon the Sabbath morning, a riotous convocation of the Leiges and extortion of Bonds and Concluding that these Should be given back and the actors punished especially with paying of a vast damnages and lest any might be left to witnes the falsehood of these stories, Gight the pursuer calls as pairties not only the Messengers assistants, which he ordinarly carries with him, but likewise the other Gentlemen who were were accidentally present, yea, even Mr William Gordon in Towie, tho he was imployed as a Communer for Gight himselfe against which Cowbairdie and Mr Duff having raised a Reconvention on Deforcement withdrawing of wryts oppression and treachery, It is answered for the Defenders to the pursuers libell, that the Same is denyed as most calumnious in all the Circumstances and qualifications therof that have the least shaddow of relevancie in them the true matter of fact being as is above represented, viz: That the first capture was not upon the Sabbath day, which as it is not presumed, so that necessary witnesses being first past from, as pairties, or cleared, it is offered to be proven to have been upon Saturday, That nothing followed therafter, except what was necessary to repell the pursuers Deforcement, or requisit to secure him against making escape, That as a Messenger dared not refuse to do his Duty, when any of the Leiges charged him with a Caption, so it is most false that Gight was Detained prisoner after the money was payed, yea he was totallie dismissed before a farthing of it was payed, which was not till some dayes therafter, That ther was no extortion in obtaining the forsaids obliegements, but on the contrary as they were congruous and just in themselves, So they were proposed by the pursuer and his friends and have been homologat after his freedome as said is, which matter is depending befor the Lords of Session, that the Defenders are so farr from being Injurers that they are the only persons injured in the caise, For Cowbairdie by all the rules of honour honesty and Law ought not to have been betrayed to trouble, Expences of plea and prison, upon Gights account when Gight putting his hand in his pocket to give out the Contract (which was most unjustly retained againest faith and right given) would have put an end to the business and Mr Duff notwithstanding of his pains in procuring the old Ladies consent to Gights own overture, and his hazard in venturing to Gights own house ere the accomodation should quite break up, and his lenity and discretion therafter intreating Gight as a Gentleman and indulging him Severall dayes from being carried to prison in presentia amicorum for ending the bussiness, Is ill rewarded by Defamation Diversion and Charges of this most groundless and absurd pursuit, and the advocats for the forsaid Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoune now of Gight pursuer in the principall lybell and Defender in the Reconvention Gave in the answers following to the forsaids letters of reconvention, Bearing the said James Hamiltone and John Duff with others their accomplices being conveened before the privy Councill, at the instance of the said Alexander Davidsone for a most atrocious Ryot and manifest oppression upon the account of assaulting and attacking the said Alexander Davidsone in his house of Gight under Cloud and Silence of night by way of hamesucken, and putting a pretended Caption in execution againest him on the Lords day, and carrying him from one place to another and detaining him as in private prison and extorting from him an accepted precept for twentie peices to the Messenger after the Debt was paid, as also extorting from him bonds for great Sums of money in relation to other things that had no concern with the Caption, the said James Hamiltoun and John Duff has raised a most Groundless and calumnious Reconvention, and first wheras it is alleadged that the said John Duff having apprehended the said Alexander Davidsone with Caption at the instance of Patrick Gordon merchant in Aberdeen, upon Saturday the Sixteenth of September last, at the said Alexander Davidsons house of Gight, he, by himself with drawen sword, and his servants did deforce or offer to deforce the Messenger, It is answered primo, That as it is false in fact, that the said Alexander Davidsone did deforce the messenger with a drawn Sword, So that it is nowayes Competent, nor can the said Defence be admitted being Contrar to the said Alexander Davidsons Lybell which bears that the said James Hamiltoun and Duff the messenger having come to his house about ten of the Cloack at Night, they were most kyndly entertained at Supper albeit they did most barbarously and treacherously abuse and maletreat the said Alexander Davidsone in his house in manner mentioned in his own Lybell, contrair to all the rules of friendship and hospitality, Secundo if the said Alexander Davidson had drawn his Sword and offered any violence to the messenger as he did not, yet he might lawfullie have done it in his own Defence, Seeing it is positively offered to be proven, as is mentioned in his Lybell that Duff the Messenger did not offer to put the Caption in execution till two of the cloack in the Sunday morning at which tyme it was most unjust and unlawfull for him to have put any legall diligence in execution, and consequently he might be lawfullie resisted, and the said Alexander Davidson might justly have opposed the Messengers illegall violence by force, Tertio that alternative, that the said Alexander Davidson and his servants did offer to deforce the messenger is no wayes relevant for a pretended offer to do a crime is no cryme when the offer did not take effect, Secundo wheras it was aleladged that the said Alexander Davidsone had raised a Councill complaint againest the said James Hamilton and Duff the Messenger which is Said to be groundless and false in all its articles, It was answered that this being but a deniall of Alexander Davidsons lybell, and nothing againest the Relevancy the lybell ought to be admitted to his probation, and he positivly offered to prove the Same, Tertio wheras it was alleadged as an aggravation that ther being a Contract of marriage betwixt the said Alexander Davidson and the heretrix of Gight by which he and his Father were obliedged to releive the old Lady Gight of the Debts of the family the said James Hamilton having borrowed the Double of that Contract from the old Lady, and lent it to the said Alexander Davidsone or his Father, wherupon the old Lady and Major Generall Buchan her Husband were distressed for many Debts of the family, and they having obtained Decreit againest the Said James Hamilton for exhibiting and delivering of the Said Contract, and yet notwithstanding the Said Alexander Davidson doth Still retain the Samen, and at last the said James Hamilton being taken with Caption and in his way to prison having called at the said Alexander Davidsone house upon the Sixteenth of December last, and Duff the Messenger taking the opportunity to execute ane other Caption againest the Said Alexander Davidson he the Said Alexander did conveen the Said James Hamiltoun in the Councill Complaint againest the Messenger and others, It was answered that the said pretended aggravation was altogether groundless, for First It was most calumnious that either the said Alexander Davidsone or his Father did borrow the Said Contract from James Hamiltown, Secundo albeit the Said Alexander Davidson had the Said Contract in his Custodie, and that the old Lady Gight had obtained a Decreit againest James Hamiltoun for exhibition and delivery therof yet neither Alexander Davidson nor his Father were any wayes concerned in that matter, Tertio as to what was lybelled in relation to the said Alexander Davidson or his Father having of the Contract and ther not giving it up to the said James Hamilton It was properly a matter of civill right, and did not inferr any cryme and so could not be Sustained So much as ane aggravation of the said James Hamilton and Duff the messengers groundless Complaint Quarto what was mentioned in the said James Hamilton and Duffs Lybell in Relation to the Said Contract is altogether extrinsick to said Alexander Davidsons complaint againest them, which is for a manifest ryot, violence and oppression for albeit the said Alexander Davidson had keeped up the said Contract, yet that was no ground for the said James Hamilton, but a great aggravation of their cryme to have concurred with Duff the Messenger, to put the Caption for a Debt in execution at an unlawfull tyme and to beat and abuse the said Alexander Davidson in his own house, which was his Sanctuary, especially after they had been so civilly and kyndly intertained by him the night before, far less that he Should have concurred with the Messenger to extort from the Said Alexander an accepted precept to the Messenger, upon the pretences of expences after the Debt was payed, and by force and violence to have extorted bonds for exhibiting and delivery of the said Contract upon great penalties ther being no Sentences or Dilligences againest him for that effect, and the said Mr William Gordon of Towie Robert Gordon his Brother and […] Bruce are justly conveened as pairties who not only concurred as Accomplices with the Said James Hamilton and Duff, but also were the principall actors who attacked the said Alexander Davidson with cocked pistolls, and laid violent hands on him and beat him to the effusion of his blood, brook his sword in the scabbert and threatned to tread him under their feet, so that the said James Hamilton and Duff the messenger and ther saids accomplices being guilty of a most attrocious ryot, violence and oppression committed by them upon the person of the said Alexander Davidson, and art and part of the Samen in manner lybelled the said Alexander Davidsons Complaint ought to be admitted to probation, and he assoilzied from the said James Hamilton and Duff the messengers groundless and calumnious complaint, as the said answers bears, And the forsaid principall Lybell with the answers made therto by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger with the forsaid Lybell of Reconvention and answers made therto by the said Alexander Davidson being all read in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, and both pairties Lawiers heard at the Barr and removed, The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by their Interloquitor the twentie third day of november instant admitted the Lybells to probation, and the witnesses for both pairties being called Such of them as are marked in the roll present Compeiring at the Barr Did make faith, The Councill nominats and appoints the Earles of Lauderdale Leven and Northesk Collingtoun and the Lord provost of Edinburgh to be a Committie to examine the witnesses, and Recommends to the said Committy to meet to morrow morning at ten acloack in the fornoon and Declares any three a quorum and to report, and grants to both pairties Letters of Second dilligence by Caption againest the absent witnesses as marked in the roll and not Compeiring, and assignes the […] day of […] next to come for that effect, But in respect the pursuer in the principall Lybell who is Defender in the Reconvention hes Cited the persons following as pairties in his principall Lybell, who are cited as witnesses for the saids pursuars in the Reconvention therby to prevent ther being adduced as necessary witnesses therin viz Master William Gordon in Towie Mr Francis Bruce merchant in Edinburgh Robert Gordon in Kinghorne John Broun his Servant Robert Watt Servitor to Patrick Gordon of Samphfoord Merchant in Aberdein Andrew Muir and Patrick Wilsone Servitors to the said John Duff, Therfore the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill Doe heirby Recommend to the Said Committy to receive the oaths and testimonies of Such witnesses as the pursuer in the principall Lybell Shall condescend on for proving the fornamed persons or any of them pairties in his principall lybell, and in caice no probation or evidence appear againest them or any of them to be pairtties, that then the said Committy receive them as witnesses for the pursuars in the Reconvention who are Defenders in the principall Lybell, and purge them of partiall Councill and malice and ordains the witnesses cited for the pursuar in the principall lybell to be at Liberty and have their full freedome, and the said Committie or their quorum having mett upon the twentie fourth day of November instant and having called in one of Gights Witnesses who being Solemnlie Sworn purged of partiall Councill and interrogat Deponed as his Deposition extant in proces bears. Therafter ther being objections offered by the Defenders in the principall lybell againest Some others of Gights witnesses which the Committie referred to the Councill, Ther was a memoriall given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by the said Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun now of Gight, Narrating as follow’s in the proces depending befor the privie Councill att the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newyoun now of Gight againest the said James Hamilton John Duff Mr William and Robert Gordons […] Bruce and others Their Lordships appoynted a Committie to examine the witnesses upon the lybell, and in caise by the probation the Committie Should find, that nothing was proven againest the said Mr William and Robert Gordons or […] Bruce that than the Committie Should admitt them as witnesses in the Reconvention, The Committie having mett, and the witnesses being called in, it was objected that […] Gights Gardner and […] his servants could not be admitted as witnesses in regard ther was not a penurie of witnesses, ther being many more who could prove the Lybell, that were present, and more habite witnesses and it being answered, that the Cryme being4 committed at Gights house in the Dead and Silence of the Night, ther is none that could be witnesses, but Such as lived at the Gates, or were his Domesticks, The Committie inclined to examine the witnesses, But the Defenders were So tenacious, as to plead that the Committie would report the objection to the Councill, which they acquiesced to do next Councill day, Their Lordships are therfor humbly desired to Consider that its impossible for Gight to prove his Lybell, but by those verie persons who live at his Gates, or in his house, ther being none else present at his maletreatment but the Defenders themselves, who are conveened by him, and as to the pretence that ther are severall other witnesses cited, these witnesses are such who can only prove the detaining of Gight prisoner, and carrying of him from place to place on the Sabbath day, and the other articles lybelled, but were not present when he was first apprehended, Especially Seeing that it is a certain rule in Law, that any mans Servants may be admitted witnesses in Domestick Crimes, in that case they being necessary witnesses, as for instance, if any man Should be assasinat in his house, the only proper witnesses that could prove this are his Servants, and in the case of hamsucken, when any man is assaulted in his house under cloud and silence of Night as this was, it is the constant practice both befor the Councill and justice Court, to allow Servants to be admitted witnesses both men and women, because in that case they are absolutly necessary witnesses, and the particulars lybelled in this Complaint, upon which the Crime principally depends, was the assaulting and attacking Gight at his house and Gate under cloud and silence of night, as the said Memoriall bears, Lykeas ther was objections given in by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff, againest Richard Melvill William Henrie, and Jannet Black witnesses offered by Alexander Davidson of Gight in his proces befor the privie Councill, againest them, Representing as follows, The honorable Lords might well remember that it was plead for Cowbairdie and Mr Duff who are the persons only aimed at by the pursuer, that he had industriously cited all the Gentelmen and their Servants, who were accidentally ther as pairties therby to deprive the Saids Cowbairdie and Mr Duff of the benefite of their Depositions in their Exculpation, and this contrivance did plainly appear by their Conduct before the Comity for when Gights oath of Calumnie was Demanded by the forsaid Gentlemens Procurators the Parties themselves also Urging it, he did absolutly Shift and Declyne to give it alleading that it was not Compitent to crave his oath of Calumnie their, it not haveing been craved at the Councill and that the Councill only Could ordain him to Give his oath of Calumnie although it be Against all reason that any person Should pretend to prove a crime against his Nighbour without purging himself of Calumnie and the Law allows of that oath In ay pairt of the proces the nixt Stept he makes he offers his own Meniall and Domestick servants as witnesses, againest whom it was objected, that they being Miniall servants, the Law did reprobate their Testimonies, and being replyed, that servants are admitted in Domestick Crimes, which was the pursuars case, The pretended illegall Caption being in his own house under Cloud of night, and therfor could only be proven by his servants and family, To which it was answered that the priviledge of receiving unhabill witnesses Such as Servants in Domestick Crimes, is only admitted in the case when ther is no other habill and unsuspect witnesses present, than all the men servants he offers so that he can never be allowed to prove an pretended Crime againest Gentlemen, alleadged committed on him at his own gate, by his Domesticks, when the said Crime was alleadged by himselfe to be committed on him at his own gate in the Sight of five habil and indifferent witnesses, three of whom viz Adam Panton in Little Gight […] Cassie in Stonhouse of Gight, and […] Davidsone of Cairnbrogie Uncle to Gight, are witnesses beyond exception and ther being on the other hand five more cited by Cowbairdie in his exculpation, besides Mr Duffs assistance, viz Mr William Gordon in Towie, Robert Gordon in Kinghorny Francis Bruce Merchant in Edinburgh, Robert Watt, Servitor to Patrick Gordon of Sandfoord, and John Broun Servitor to the above designed Robert Gordon all persons present at the pretended ryot, besides Mr Duff and his ordinary assistants and witnesses all which persons of integrity and knowen Reputation are cited by the pursuar as pairties and accessaries to the pretended ryot, although they had no manner of accession therto, on purpose to preclude the Defenders from the benefite of their Depositions, and would prove the forsaid pretended accession by Domesticks, which the Law does Still reprobate, except in the caise wher ther are no other witnesses present, This was not a Domestick Crime that was lybelled, but the question was anent the legallity of the executing of the Caption in which the messenger and his witnesses in the execution are testes instrumentury et necessary, and therfor they can never be casten as pairtties and the pursuars design of making the whole persons present who are cited for the Defender pairties, except his own Uncle, and his obstinatly refusing at the Committie, to allow any of the unsuspect and habile witnesses to Depone and Shifting and refusing to purge himself of Calumnies is so evident a Contrivance that it is confidently hoped that the Lords of Councill will never allow any of his Domesticks to Depone, in respect ther are four or five unsuspect habill witnesses present at the pretended ryot, and who are cited by the pursuar himselfe, as the saids objections also bears which memoriall and objections being upon the twentie eight day of november instant read in presence of the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, and they having considered the same The Saids Lords appoynted and ordained the said Alexander Davidson of Newtoun to give his oath of Calumnie in the said proces befor the said Committie and therafter Recommends to the Said Committie formerly appoynted therin to examine Adam Panton in Little Gight, and […] Davidson in Carnbrogie witnesses for the said Davidson of Gight, and in case it appear by ther oaths and testimonies that they were present all the tyme lybelled than the saids Lords have found and heirby finds that ther is no penury of witnesses, and that Gights miniall and Domestick servants ought not to be received as witnesses for him in the forsaid proces, But in caice it do not appear, appoynts his Domestick Servants to be received and Recommends to the said Committie to meet to morrow at eleven acloack in the fornoon and to report, and the said Committie or their quorum having mett upon the twentie ninth of november instant, Did first of all in obedience to the forsaid Interloquitor take the said Alexander Davidsone of Gight his oath of Calumnie, as the Samen extant in proces bears. And therafter called for another of Gights witnesses, who being solemnlie sworn purged of partiall Councill and malice Deponed as his Deposition extant in proces also bears, Therafter the said Committie conforme to the two severall remitts to them theranent having examined Robert Mitchell in Ellon and Adam Panton in Little Gight and have considered their Depositions they are of opinion that the saids two witnesses proved nothing against Mr William Gordon in Towie Francis Bruce son to the Deceast Alexander Bruce in Birne, and the rest of the Defenders who are cited as pairties in the principall lybell and witnesses in the Reconvention to make them pairties (except only against the person aftermentioned) and that the said persons cited as pairties in the principall lybell ought to be received as witnesses in the Reconvention for Cowbairdie and Mr Duff, except only that the saids two witnesses prove something againest Robert Gordon Brother to the said Master William, But how far that can make him a pairtie the Committy Remitts the Consideration therof to the Councill and appoynts Cowbairdie and John Duffs witnesses to be receieved the morrow att ten a Cloack in the fornoon and are of opinion that ther is no penury of witnsses, and accordingly the Said Committie having mett this Day and called for severall of Cowbairdies and John Duffs witnesses, who Compeared and being solemnlie sworn purged of partiall Councill and interrogat upon their great oaths Deponed as their Depositions extant in proces lykewise bears. Therafter ther being a petition lykewayes presented to the Saids Lords by Alexander Davidson of Gight, Shewing that when the Complaint at the petitioners instance againest Cowbairdie, Mr Duff and their Accomplices, and the Reconvention at their instance againest me were read and Debate in their Lordships presence, that which the petitioner endeavoured to obviat was that Cowbairdie and Mr Duffs Servants and those other Accomplices who came along with them to his house Should not be admitted witnesses againest him being actuallie pairties and conveened as Such, Their Lordships pronounced a most just interloquitor in Relation to this poynt viz that his witnesses Should be first examined as to what they knew of Mr William and Robert Gordons and Francis Bruce ther actings or assistance in this matter, and if any thing were proven againest them they were not to be admitted as witnesses in the Reconvention, and if nothing were proven than they were to be Receaved when in the terms of this Interloquitor, the petitioner and his procurators Compeared befor the Commity wher the witnesses being to be examined, he did condescend on Such witnesses, first to be examined as he thought would be probation againest the saids masters Gordons and Bruce, against which witnesses Cowbairdie and Mr Duff did object that they were his own servants and therfor could not be received, but did urge that other witnesses whom they had cited might be examined, Wherupon Robert Mitchell on of his witnesses was called who being examined deponed somethings in relation to what happened at Gights gates the tyme lybelled and about the tyme of night but did not See all the particulars condescended on, nor know the Defenders except Robert Gordon, and Francis Bruce, as to whom he Depones on Some particulars as by his oath in the Clerks hands will appear, He being then obliedged to desyre his own Servants Should be examined, Because he knew ther were none other of his witnesses that could prove any thing againest those persons first to be considered, and therupon my procurators did make ane answer to the objection made againest them, viz that it was a Crime done done5 in the night time, and at his own gate wher ther was ane evident penury of witnesses none being present but the actors of the Crime and his own Servants, which the Lords of the Committie being pleased to report to their Lordships the matter was ordered to this effect that he Should give his oath of Calumnie as to the lybell againest Mrs William Robert Gordons and Bruce, and than their Lordships Recommends it to the Lords of the Committy to call and examine Adam Panton in Little Gight, and George6 Davidson of Cairnbrogie two of his witnesses and in case by their Depositions the Lords of the Committie Should find that they were both present at all the actions lybelled, Then their Lordships fand no penury and therfor his Servants not to be received, But in caice by their Depositions it Should appear they were not present, Than their Lordships as witnesses, In obedience to which interloquitor the Lords of the Committy having mett and examined Adam Panton the first witnes condescended on in the last Interloquitor who indeed did appear to be present at all the transactions lybelled, except that he was in the Stable, when John Duff, first Seased me, as his Deposition in the Clerks hands will testifie, Kairnbrogie being the nixt witnes condescended on He was called for whom a testificat was produced upon soul and conscience by phisitians and a minister that he was not able to come up, and farder upon his application the pursuars did judicially acknowledge that altho he were present he could prove nothing as to the Crimes committed at my gate at the tyme lybelled in regard he was in his bed befor they came to Gight and the tyme they went away, Wherupon I did expect that the alternative of their Lordships interloquitor was to take place so that his Servants Should be called and received, But in place therof the Lords of the Committie were pleased to find ther was no penury And therfore none of his miniall servants was to be received, and furder fand nothing was proven by his two witnesses examined againest Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce to inferr the Crimes lybelled, and therfor allowed them to be examined as witnesses in the Reconvention, wheranent they gave in a memoriall to the saids Lords of the Commity representing what was abovementioned, and Craving they would be7 pleased to reconsider their Interloquitor, to which they were pleased to give them this answer that they were not inclined to alter their Interloquitor But did allow them to apply to their Lordships and therupon Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce were examined, He is not at present to Complain upon the Honorable Lords of the Committy their Interloquitor and examining Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce he most begg leave to represent to their Lordships that his servants may be allowed to prove severall points of his lybell committed at his own gate againest the other Defenders Since these two alreadie examined are ignorant of several points therof, and its humbly contended that this is most agrieable to their Lordships former Interloquitor anent ther being examined, and were a great hardship upon their petitioners if the Same were not allowed Since the penury is evident these two alreadie deponing being almost in the Same caise as his own Servants the one of them to witt Mr Panton being his tennant and daylie attendant, and the other his Uncles Servant who was accidentally ther, and by their Depositions it will appear ther were severall things they were ignorant of, so that if the Defenders had not knowen that they would have objected againest them as well as the rest, and then he Should have been allowed no witnesses at all, and consequently no Crimes of the like nature could be proven but by the soiy criminis, which would be a most Dangerous consequence, And lastly what ever may be pretended againest his Deomstick Servants yet that can never exclude William Hendry his Gardner who hes a Distinct family of his own a peice distant from his house only labours his yards, and a little peice of ground to his own use in possesion wherof he has continued for fourteen years bypast and never received his entertainment in his family So that to exclude him were to frustrat him of all kind of probation which it is hoped their Lordships justice will not allow, and therfore Creaving their Lordships to consider the premisses and to allow the Committy to examine his haill other witnesses cited againest Cowbairdy and Mr Duff at least so many of them as their Lordships Shall think fitt, as the said petition bears And ther being lykewayes another petition given in and presented to the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger, Shewing that wher the petitioners were most unjustly persewed at the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun and now of Gight befor their Lordships for alleadged illegall and inhumane seizing of him in his house with Caption upon the seventeenth of September being Sundays morning after he had kyndlie entertained them in his house at Supper, In which most ungrate and calumnious Lybell he cites the haill Gentlemen and their Servants that were present as pairties and accessories to the pretended Crime on direct purpose to preclude their petitioners from proving of their Defence of exculpation and Recrimination, which being taken notice of in the pleading befor their Lordships They did most justly to Disapoint the pursuars their Designe appoynt the pursuar first to insist againest the Gentlemen and others Cited in their Reconvention, to the effect that if it did appear to the Lords of the Committie, that they had no accession to the said pretended Crime and violence they might be received witnesses in the Reconvention And accordingly the Committie having mett and taken the Deposition of one Mitchell who Deponed that he saw none of the witnesses cited in their Reconvention offer any violence to the said Laird of Gight, althrough he was present at the tyme of the said Capture and knew the said persons Gight did therafter offer to adduce his own servants as witnesses, and it being objected that they could not be received, as being inhabite by Law and it being replyed that the Cryme lybelled being Domestick Servants were priviledged as necessary witnesses, To which it being Duplyed that althroug Servants were admitted in Domestick Crimes yet that was only when the crime was Committed by Surprize on the family when ther were no other free and habite witnesses present, but, here the persons were Invited to Gights own house, and ther were other habite and unsuspect witnesses present, Therfor the servants could not be admitted, This objection being reported to their Lordships by the president of the Committy, their Lordships found that if ther were two free unsuspect witnesses who could Depone they were present, and that they Saw no violence Committed by the witnesses cited in the Reconvention, That ther Domesticks Should not be admitted, but that the witnesses Cited in the Reconvention Should be received although cited by the pursuar as pairties, The Lords of Committie did proceed according to their Lordships Recomendation and examined Adam Panton in Little Gight a person who was imployed by Gight himself in the whole matter who concurred with the former witnesses adduced by the pursuar, That he Saw no violence committed or offered by the witnesses Cited in the Reconvention to the Laird of Gight, and that they were present at the tyme of Mr Duffs seizing of the Laird of Gight, on the Caption lybelled on by the pursuers The Committie having Considered the two positive Depositions of the habile and unsuspect witnesses They did in the terms of their Lordships Recommendation find that the forsaid Gentlemen witnesses cited in the Reconvention were cleared from anie accession of the forsaid pretended Crime and refused to admitt the forsaid Domesticks as witnesses againest them, and admitted the witnesses cited by them, to depon, and They accordingly adduced Three, vis: Mr William Gordon a persone imployed as Mediator in the whole matter by Gight himself Mr Francis Bruce Merchant in Edinburgh a meer stranger in that Countrey who accidentally mett with them at Miltoun of Fyvie, and had not So much as acquaintance with anie of the pairties, and also Robert Watt servitor to Samfoord by whose Depositions, the whole tract and serious of this affair is made so evident and clear that Its humbly hoped their Lordships will See nothing remain upon the parte of the pursuar but the utmost ingratitude, Clamour Calumnie and unjustice, and their Lordships will also see by the Depositions that the Caption was also execute betwixt ten and eleven, and that the Samen was therafter Satisfied and transacted in the presence of the Right Honorable persons afternamed, viz The Earle of Aberdein and the Lord Haddo one of their Lordships number whose presence does exclude all pretence of force or extortion, and does Demonstrat the greatest Calumnie of this after pursuite, Their Lordships petitioners have severall other witnesses but Seeing the matter So fully cleared already, and Seeing the proces has been so grievous and expensive to them, and that the high Ingratitude and Injustice their petitioners have met with by the said Gight in all this matter, They humbly hope and begg their Lordships will instantly advise the probation, And therfor Craving their Lordships Seriously to consider the forsaid probation with the haill serious and tract of this affair and to modifie a sume of money to be payed to them for their expences and Damnadge which are verie great and heavie the said Injurious proces having been extreamly prejudiciall to them in asbtracting them from their necessars and important affairs, and otherwayes punish the pursuar as their Lordships In justice Shall think proper for preventing of Such gross oppression in time comeing, as the said petition lykewayes bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having this day proceeded to advyse, the mutuall proceses at the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun now of Gight, againest Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger et e contra and the lybells principall and Reconvention with answers therto and petitions by both pairties with the Depositions of the witnesses adduced for either pairtie in the said proces being all read, and the saids Lords having considered the same, Have found and heirby Finds the principall lybell at the instance of the said Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun not proven, and have Assoilzied and heirby assoilzies the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger and other Defenders therin from the haill poynts and articles therof, and have Declared and heirby Declares them quyt therof and free therfrae in all tyme coming and have Found and heirby Finds the forsaid lybell of Reconvention raised at the instance of the said James Hamiltoun of Cowbairdie and John Duff againest the said Alexander Davidsone Sufficiently proven, and both pairties being called into the barr The Lord Marques of Annandale Lord president of privie Councill Did intimat the Samen to them accordingly.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 307v-319r.

2. Sic.

3. The word ‘name’ is an insertion.

4. The word ‘being’ is an insertion.

5. Sic.

6. Written over the name ‘John’.

7. The word ‘be’ is an insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 307v-319r.

2. Sic.

3. The word ‘name’ is an insertion.

4. The word ‘being’ is an insertion.

5. Sic.

6. Written over the name ‘John’.

7. The word ‘be’ is an insertion.

Sederunt, 30 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 17041

D1704/11/122

Sederunt

Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Craufurd; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Lord Advocat; Lord Enstruther; Lord Rankeilor; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fra: Montgomery; Laird of Carnwath; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 17041

D1704/11/122

Sederunt

Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Craufurd; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Lord Advocat; Lord Enstruther; Lord Rankeilor; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fra: Montgomery; Laird of Carnwath; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/28, 307v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 307v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 307v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 307v.