Act, 30 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/151

Act

Act In favours of the Burgh of Annan

Anent The petition given in and presented to the Lords of his Majesties privie Councill, by the Magistrats and Toun Councill of the Burgh of Annan, Shewing, That there being a Bridge of Fyve arches built over the river of Annan for the Service of the Leidges and preserveing ane ready passage of Such as had occasion to travell for Merchandise or otherwayes to and from the Shires of Drumfreis Galloway and Air to England was now furnished upon the great expensses travell and pains of the petitioners, and that the maintaining and keeping in repair of the said Bridge, and the high wayes and Cassyes leading to, from, and at the said Bridge, did necessarly requyre ane greater charge and expence yearly to be laid then the petitioners were able to affoord, as also by the Sixteen act of the Second parliament King Charles Second, The repairing and keeping up of bridges, and upholding the Cassyes and wayes leading to and from the Same, are so farr Considered as ane usefull and necessary work, That power was expressly given to their Lordships, To ordain the levieing of modern Customes at Bridges, for the repairing and upholding therof And to appoynt the endurance of the same as their Lordships Should See cause Conforme to which power given to their Lordships small Customs had been allowed and appoynted to be uplifted at severall Bridges within this Kingdome and particularly by their Lordships act of the date the Twentie nynth of July Jaj vic nyntie Seven years, there were allowed and appoynted to be Collected and uplifted at Bothwell bridge the small customes following For repairing and upholding therof, Viz: For each foot man Two pennies each horseman, Sex pennies for everie ox Cow, Stirk, quey, horse, mare, Staig or others of these kinds Four pennies for each Load of victuall, eight pennies, for each pack of merchandise or other goods two Shilling all Scots money, And that for the Space of three nyntein years, Commenseing from the tyme therinmentioned, And the forsaid Bridge over the river of Annan being of alse generall use, And requyring no less charge and expence to repair and uphold the same, And therfore Craving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears, The Lords of his Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them be the Magistrats and Toun Councill of the Burgh of Annan, and the Samen being read in their presence, The Saids Lords have allowed and ordained, and heirby allowes and Ordaines The small Customes and Duties of Two pennies for each footman sex pennies for each horseman, Four pennies for each ox, Cow, Stirk, quey, horse, mare, Staig, and others of these kinds, and eight pennies for each load of victuall, And two shilling for each pack of Merchandise or other goods all Scots money, To be levied exacted and uptaken at the Said Bridge over the river of Annan for the Space of Three Nynteen years, Commenseing from the first day of January next to Come, by the petitioners, For upholding maintaining and repairing the said bridge, or Such as the petitioners Shall imploy For collecting and uplifting therof upon there giving bond and finding Sufficient Caution to imploy the same for the forsaid at the sight alwayes of the Marquess of Annandale, his heirs and Successors

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/151

Act

Act In favours of the Burgh of Annan

Anent The petition given in and presented to the Lords of his Majesties privie Councill, by the Magistrats and Toun Councill of the Burgh of Annan, Shewing, That there being a Bridge of Fyve arches built over the river of Annan for the Service of the Leidges and preserveing ane ready passage of Such as had occasion to travell for Merchandise or otherwayes to and from the Shires of Drumfreis Galloway and Air to England was now furnished upon the great expensses travell and pains of the petitioners, and that the maintaining and keeping in repair of the said Bridge, and the high wayes and Cassyes leading to, from, and at the said Bridge, did necessarly requyre ane greater charge and expence yearly to be laid then the petitioners were able to affoord, as also by the Sixteen act of the Second parliament King Charles Second, The repairing and keeping up of bridges, and upholding the Cassyes and wayes leading to and from the Same, are so farr Considered as ane usefull and necessary work, That power was expressly given to their Lordships, To ordain the levieing of modern Customes at Bridges, for the repairing and upholding therof And to appoynt the endurance of the same as their Lordships Should See cause Conforme to which power given to their Lordships small Customs had been allowed and appoynted to be uplifted at severall Bridges within this Kingdome and particularly by their Lordships act of the date the Twentie nynth of July Jaj vic nyntie Seven years, there were allowed and appoynted to be Collected and uplifted at Bothwell bridge the small customes following For repairing and upholding therof, Viz: For each foot man Two pennies each horseman, Sex pennies for everie ox Cow, Stirk, quey, horse, mare, Staig or others of these kinds Four pennies for each Load of victuall, eight pennies, for each pack of merchandise or other goods two Shilling all Scots money, And that for the Space of three nyntein years, Commenseing from the tyme therinmentioned, And the forsaid Bridge over the river of Annan being of alse generall use, And requyring no less charge and expence to repair and uphold the same, And therfore Craving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears, The Lords of his Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them be the Magistrats and Toun Councill of the Burgh of Annan, and the Samen being read in their presence, The Saids Lords have allowed and ordained, and heirby allowes and Ordaines The small Customes and Duties of Two pennies for each footman sex pennies for each horseman, Four pennies for each ox, Cow, Stirk, quey, horse, mare, Staig, and others of these kinds, and eight pennies for each load of victuall, And two shilling for each pack of Merchandise or other goods all Scots money, To be levied exacted and uptaken at the Said Bridge over the river of Annan for the Space of Three Nynteen years, Commenseing from the first day of January next to Come, by the petitioners, For upholding maintaining and repairing the said bridge, or Such as the petitioners Shall imploy For collecting and uplifting therof upon there giving bond and finding Sufficient Caution to imploy the same for the forsaid at the sight alwayes of the Marquess of Annandale, his heirs and Successors

1. NRS, PC2/28, 320v-321v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 320v-321v.

Decreet, 30 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/141

Decreet

Interloquitor upon the petition by Captain Donaldson and the Hammermen in Edinburgh

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lord president, and the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by James Donaldson Merchant in Edinburgh, Shewing that wher by the act of security all her majesties protestant subjects of this Kingdome are to be armed, and probably ther may be vast sums of money sent abroad to purchase arms to the Detriment of this nation, wheras the Kingdome may be Served within itself, if incouradgement were granted, The petitioner humbly Represents that he has (after great pains) found out ane effectuall way to make machines, wherby severall parts of the calling and art of smith Craft, particularly with relation to the making of arms may be performed without the Strenth and labour of men, such as blowing with bellowes, boring with run Spindles, beating with hammers, Stricking of files, by help of which machines the making of arms, and other pairts of smithcraft will be much facilitate, and the money (which otherwayes would be exported, to the incouradgement of Foreigners) may be kept within the Kingdom, to the encouradgement of our own tradesmen and universall benefite of the Subjects, especially at Such a juncture when great numers of arms are required, And therfor Craving their Lordships to take the premisses to consideration and allow the petitioner and Such pairtners as Shall joine with him, to set up a manufactorie for making of arms and other things relating to Smithcraft, with the ordinary priviledges allowed to publick manufactories, and to Discharge all others within this Kingdom for the Space of […] years to make use of Such engines or Machines which Shall be made use of by the petitioner and partners that has never hitherto been made use of in this Kingdom under the pain of forfeiting the said instruments or Machins to the petitioner or his assigney’s, and to pay him or them the Sum of […] fine, over the forsaid forfeiture as is customary in the like cases, and if any Difficultie remain with their Lordships anent the operation of the said Machines, The petitioner humbly represents that he has a modell of the same, now in readiness, which Shall be Shown to any of their Lordships number, whom you shall please to appoint to See the same as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition given in to them by James Donaldson merchant in Edinburgh, and the samen being read in their presence The Saids Lords Doe heirby nominate and appoynt the Earles of Lauderdale Lord Enstruther and the provest of Edinburgh to be a Committy to consider the above petition and matter therin Represented and to report nixt Councill day and Declares any two a quorum 2 Lords, And having heard a verball Report made by the Committy appoynted to consider Captain Donaldsons petition they heirby allow the Deacon of the Smiths to see and answer the same next Councill day peremptorie Accordingly the said Deacon of the Smiths Having seen the said petition He returned the samen with the Answers following Viz. That there having been a petition given into the saids Lords By James Donaldson, Representing that Seeing by the act of Security her Majesties Protestant Subjects are to be armed, which may occasion great Soumes of money to be Sent abroad for purchasing of arms to the great loss of the Nation, and that he having discovered ane effectuall way to make machines with relation to the making of armes, which may facilitate the working therof without the Strength and labour of men by blowing bellowes, boreing with run Spindles, beating with hammers Stricking with fyles, and therfore craving the Saids Lords will allow him and Such partners he Shall assume to Sett up manufactories for making of armes and others relating to Smithcraft with all priviledge Competent to Manufactories and to Discharge all others for the Space of […] years to make use of Such machines under the payne of forfaulting the instruments or machines and to pay to him or his assigney’s the Soume of […] of penaltie The Saids Lords having out of their goodness and justice allowed them to see and answer the said petition, They humbly begg leave to Represent primo It was well knowen that James Donaldson never professed any Skill or knowledge, and has had far less experience in Mechanicks particularly their trade, and the designe of the petition Seem’s either to be out of malice and prejudice to their petitioners, or else the proposall of the Machine was but ane engine to inhaune a little money to Supply his necessity Seeing he knowes verie well they are far more capable to provyde both the publict and private persons with good and Sufficient arm’s and so to prevent the export of money for that end then he can pretend to, Secundo They are founded in the poynt of right Seeing by their Soles of cause and other priviledges granted to them by her Majesties Royall predecessors Magistrats and Toun Councill of Edinburgh and ratified in parliament, wherof they had been in the immemoriall uninterrupted possession, They had the sole exercise and priviledge of making and selling of armes within Burgh and the Desire of Such a manufactory or Monopolie was not only encroachment upon, but ane Inhinging of ther Saids rights and priviledges ratified as Said is, Tertio when ever any good artift Countrey man or Forraigner that merits by his Skill and experience to be assumed to their fraternity they never Declyned the Same upon application for that effect But did alwayes give and will give Such persones due encouradgement, So that if any good artist who works other work then their petitioners does (which Mr Donaldsone will not pretend to) were desirous to be Incorporat with them, They would not Declyne to assume him which was all that could be requyred, and answers the Design and end of the petition But Quarto as they are more able and capable to furnish both publict and private armes of all Sorts at reasonable and easie rates, and can make use of machines for that end to better purpose then Mr Donadlsone can pretend to, so they undertake to furnish both publict and private with Such quantities of armes good and sufficient as Shall be Desired at as easie rates as they can be had from abroad wherby the export of money for that end will be prevented, and therfor Craving their Lordships In respect of the premisses to refuse the Desire of the Said James Donaldsons Petition as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them by James Donaldsone merchant in Edinburgh together with the above petition by way of answers therto by the Incorporation of the hammermen of Edinburgh, and the Samen being read in their presence the Saids Lords doe heirby Recommend to the former Committy appoynted in the said matter, and adds therto the Earle of Leven to endeavour to adjust matters betwixt the saids petitioners as to what is represented in the forsaids petitions and to report and continues the quorum as formerly, Which petition of Captain Donaldsons and answers therto by the Incorporation of the Hammermen being upon the thirtieth of this instant Considered by the saids Lords they have refused and heirby refuses the Desire of Captains Donaldsons petition

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/141

Decreet

Interloquitor upon the petition by Captain Donaldson and the Hammermen in Edinburgh

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lord president, and the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by James Donaldson Merchant in Edinburgh, Shewing that wher by the act of security all her majesties protestant subjects of this Kingdome are to be armed, and probably ther may be vast sums of money sent abroad to purchase arms to the Detriment of this nation, wheras the Kingdome may be Served within itself, if incouradgement were granted, The petitioner humbly Represents that he has (after great pains) found out ane effectuall way to make machines, wherby severall parts of the calling and art of smith Craft, particularly with relation to the making of arms may be performed without the Strenth and labour of men, such as blowing with bellowes, boring with run Spindles, beating with hammers, Stricking of files, by help of which machines the making of arms, and other pairts of smithcraft will be much facilitate, and the money (which otherwayes would be exported, to the incouradgement of Foreigners) may be kept within the Kingdom, to the encouradgement of our own tradesmen and universall benefite of the Subjects, especially at Such a juncture when great numers of arms are required, And therfor Craving their Lordships to take the premisses to consideration and allow the petitioner and Such pairtners as Shall joine with him, to set up a manufactorie for making of arms and other things relating to Smithcraft, with the ordinary priviledges allowed to publick manufactories, and to Discharge all others within this Kingdom for the Space of […] years to make use of Such engines or Machines which Shall be made use of by the petitioner and partners that has never hitherto been made use of in this Kingdom under the pain of forfeiting the said instruments or Machins to the petitioner or his assigney’s, and to pay him or them the Sum of […] fine, over the forsaid forfeiture as is customary in the like cases, and if any Difficultie remain with their Lordships anent the operation of the said Machines, The petitioner humbly represents that he has a modell of the same, now in readiness, which Shall be Shown to any of their Lordships number, whom you shall please to appoint to See the same as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition given in to them by James Donaldson merchant in Edinburgh, and the samen being read in their presence The Saids Lords Doe heirby nominate and appoynt the Earles of Lauderdale Lord Enstruther and the provest of Edinburgh to be a Committy to consider the above petition and matter therin Represented and to report nixt Councill day and Declares any two a quorum 2 Lords, And having heard a verball Report made by the Committy appoynted to consider Captain Donaldsons petition they heirby allow the Deacon of the Smiths to see and answer the same next Councill day peremptorie Accordingly the said Deacon of the Smiths Having seen the said petition He returned the samen with the Answers following Viz. That there having been a petition given into the saids Lords By James Donaldson, Representing that Seeing by the act of Security her Majesties Protestant Subjects are to be armed, which may occasion great Soumes of money to be Sent abroad for purchasing of arms to the great loss of the Nation, and that he having discovered ane effectuall way to make machines with relation to the making of armes, which may facilitate the working therof without the Strength and labour of men by blowing bellowes, boreing with run Spindles, beating with hammers Stricking with fyles, and therfore craving the Saids Lords will allow him and Such partners he Shall assume to Sett up manufactories for making of armes and others relating to Smithcraft with all priviledge Competent to Manufactories and to Discharge all others for the Space of […] years to make use of Such machines under the payne of forfaulting the instruments or machines and to pay to him or his assigney’s the Soume of […] of penaltie The Saids Lords having out of their goodness and justice allowed them to see and answer the said petition, They humbly begg leave to Represent primo It was well knowen that James Donaldson never professed any Skill or knowledge, and has had far less experience in Mechanicks particularly their trade, and the designe of the petition Seem’s either to be out of malice and prejudice to their petitioners, or else the proposall of the Machine was but ane engine to inhaune a little money to Supply his necessity Seeing he knowes verie well they are far more capable to provyde both the publict and private persons with good and Sufficient arm’s and so to prevent the export of money for that end then he can pretend to, Secundo They are founded in the poynt of right Seeing by their Soles of cause and other priviledges granted to them by her Majesties Royall predecessors Magistrats and Toun Councill of Edinburgh and ratified in parliament, wherof they had been in the immemoriall uninterrupted possession, They had the sole exercise and priviledge of making and selling of armes within Burgh and the Desire of Such a manufactory or Monopolie was not only encroachment upon, but ane Inhinging of ther Saids rights and priviledges ratified as Said is, Tertio when ever any good artift Countrey man or Forraigner that merits by his Skill and experience to be assumed to their fraternity they never Declyned the Same upon application for that effect But did alwayes give and will give Such persones due encouradgement, So that if any good artist who works other work then their petitioners does (which Mr Donaldsone will not pretend to) were desirous to be Incorporat with them, They would not Declyne to assume him which was all that could be requyred, and answers the Design and end of the petition But Quarto as they are more able and capable to furnish both publict and private armes of all Sorts at reasonable and easie rates, and can make use of machines for that end to better purpose then Mr Donadlsone can pretend to, so they undertake to furnish both publict and private with Such quantities of armes good and sufficient as Shall be Desired at as easie rates as they can be had from abroad wherby the export of money for that end will be prevented, and therfor Craving their Lordships In respect of the premisses to refuse the Desire of the Said James Donaldsons Petition as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them by James Donaldsone merchant in Edinburgh together with the above petition by way of answers therto by the Incorporation of the hammermen of Edinburgh, and the Samen being read in their presence the Saids Lords doe heirby Recommend to the former Committy appoynted in the said matter, and adds therto the Earle of Leven to endeavour to adjust matters betwixt the saids petitioners as to what is represented in the forsaids petitions and to report and continues the quorum as formerly, Which petition of Captain Donaldsons and answers therto by the Incorporation of the Hammermen being upon the thirtieth of this instant Considered by the saids Lords they have refused and heirby refuses the Desire of Captains Donaldsons petition

1. NRS, PC2/28, 319r-320v.

2. Marginal note: ‘Which Petition being upon the Sixteenth instant Read in presence of the saids’.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 319r-320v.

2. Marginal note: ‘Which Petition being upon the Sixteenth instant Read in presence of the saids’.

Decreet, 30 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/131

Decreet

Decreit absolvitor John Duff and others against Davidsone of Newtoune

Anent the principall lybell or letters of Complaint raised and persewed befor the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill at the instance of Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun now of Geight, with concourse of Sir James Stewart Her Majesties advocat for her Highness interest, Makeing Mention that where by the Lawes of this and all other well governed Realms the publict peace ought to be be2 observed and all persons secure under the faith therof and protection of the Government, and that for any to brake the same by attacking and assaulting or injuring any other in their person or goods specially when done under a pretence and collour of friendship and a pretext of Law and legall dilligence and also on the Lords day when all execution even through legall ought to cease Is a high Cryme and ought to be Severly punished and the persone injured aught also to be restored and reponed againest all the effects and consequences therof Nevertheless It is of verity that James Hamilton of Cupbardie Mr William Gordon in Towie Robert Gordon his Brother […] Bruce and […] their servants and accomplices and John Duff messenger and […] Servitor to the Said John Duff Shaking off all regaird to our authority and Laws coming upon the Sixteenth of September last being Saturday at ten acloack at night to the house of Geicht, as if they had been friends and in a peaceable manner, were ther kyndlie entertained at Supper But after they had Stayed till two acloack on Sunday morning being the seventeenth of the said moneth and would needs be gone the Complainer did in Civility convoy them to their horses and than and ther the said James Hamiltoun of Cupbardie with Duff the messenger and other persons abovenamed Drew and cockt their pistolls and the messenger told Geicht that he was his prisoner at Patrick Gordons instance, Wherupon they all laid hold on him and took his sword from him braking it in the scabard and beat him to the great effusion of his bloud and the said Cupbardie threatned to Shoot on of Geichts Servants who offered to rescue him from their violence, and the saids persons having taken Geicht thus illegally on the Lords Day and violently and treacherously in manner forsaid They carried him as a prisoner all the Lords Day without regaird to the Divyne Service from place to place, and the said Cupbardie being Factor for the estate of Towie Did unlawfully Convocat the Tennents of Towie in arm’s to Destroy the Complainer, and thus carried him from one ale house to another Drinking Still on his Charges They keept him untill he gott a friend to pay the Debt in their pretended Caption, But when the Debt in the Caption was payed the said Messenger Duff would not pairt with the Complainer untill he extorted from him ane accepted bill of twentie pounds for his own Charges and when this was done the said Cupbardie told the Complainer (through he had not any ground or warrant for it) that he was Still his prisoner and Swore many bloody oaths he would not pairt with him but carry him wher no friend Should ever hear of him, Unless he would grant a bond of the like soume to Major Generall Buchan that within fourtein dayes he Should Registrat his Double of ane Contract of marriage and deliver ane Extract therof to the major Generall, Wherby the Complainer being Surprized, and Seeing a great many armed men upon the adjacent raising grounds ready to assist Cupbardie; and the Major Generall telling him that if he refused what was Demanded worse things might fall out, the Complainer and his Uncle Carnbryie were therby by violence and fear forced to grant the saids two bonds Lykeas all the tyme the Complainer was kept by them in Custody as a prisoner, They guarded him night and day with bended pistolls, By all which it is evident the said Hamiltoune of Cupbardie Mr William Gordon in Towie and Robert Gordon his Brother with the other persons abovenamed and Duff the Messenger are all and each of them Guiltie airt and pairt of a violent breach of the peace and most attrocious ryot and oppression and of having Committed privatam Carcerem, and the other violences and injuries abovementioned Which being proven befor the Lords of our privie Councill They ought not only to be Decerned in the Soume of Three thousand punds Scots of Damnages and expenses and ordained to redeliver the forsaid accepted bill and two bonds wrongously extorted as said is to be Cancelled, But also they ought to be farder punished in their persons and goods for the Crymes abovementioned to the example and terror of others to Committ the like in tyme coming, And anent the Chairge given to the Said Defender to have Compeired personally befor the Saids Lords at ane certain day bygone to have answered to the points of the said Complaint, and to have heard and Seen Such order and course taken theranent as the said Lords Should think fitt with certification as in the principall lybell or letters of complaint at more lenth is contained, And alse Anent the Lybell of Reconvention purchast and raised befor the saids Lords of Her Majesties privie Councill at the instance of the saids James Hamiltoun of Cupbairdie and John Duff messenger with concourse of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat for her Highness interest Making mention that where by the Laws of this and all well governed Nations the deforcing or attempting to deforce Messengers in the lawfull execution of their office, and yet Notwithstanding therof the traduceing the said Messenger and his assistants for doing their Duty by most calumnious Complaints befor the Lords of our privie Councill, as also the withdrawing and abstracting of wryts of greatest importance or being airt and pairt therof against faith and trust given to the Contrary, wherupon the intruster is Subjected to personall execution and many other hardships, and likewayes the defaming of her Majesties Leidges who are of unquestionable reputation with the odious Crymes of oppression and abuse of the Lords day, and the putting of them to unnecessary trouble and expenses theranent are Crimes of a high nature and Severly punishable, and the persons so injured ought to be redressed, Nevertheless It is of verity that Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun and now of Geicht is guilty of the forsaid Delinquencies insofarr as that the Complainer the said John Duff haveing upon the Sixteenth of September last being Saturday execute or offered to execute letters of Caption at the instance of Patrick Gordon merchant in Aberdein, in her Majesties name againest the said Alexander Davidsone He in Confidence of being at his own house of Gicht Did by himselfe with drawen Sword, and by his Servants Deforce or offer to Deforce this lawfull authoritie with violence and resistance as also the said Alexander Davidsone has taken the confidence to raise a Councill Complaint not only againest the said messenger but also against the Complainer the said James Hamiltoun of Copbairdie, which is most groundless and false in all the articles therof and which calumnie and Defamation is the more aggravat in regaird of the particulars following, Viz that the said Complainer hes been most notoriously abused by the said Alexander Davidsone his Father and others for his behove (with whom he is airt and pairt) insofarr as ther being a Contract of marriage betwixt the Said Alexander and the Heretrix of Gicht in which Alexander and his Father were bound to releive (upon a profitable translation) the old Lady Geicht, off the Debts of the family the Comapliner the said Hamiltoun of Cowbardie borroued the old Ladies Double of that Contract, and under the greatest appearance of friendship did Lend the Same to the said Alexander or his Father for his behove, Wherupon the old Ladie and Major Generall Buchan her husband being Distressed for many Debts of the family by Such Creditors as the said Alexander and his Father did most inhumanly hund out while they retained the Contract which obliedged them in relief of the Same as aforsaid having pursued the Complainer in ane Exhibition and obtained two Decreets in foro against the Complainer after he had made many instances to the said Alexander and his Father for freeing him by producing the forsaid Contract they most treacherously and ungratefully did keep the same up both from the Complainer and from the Major Generall and his Lady who prosecute the exhibition till at last the Complainer being taken with Caption and in his way to prison having called at the said Alexanders house on the Sixteenth day of September last (the Complainer being taken with Caption) in order to his make his last intreatie of his Liberating the Complainer by Delivering up the forsaid Contract and the Messenger who had the Complainer in Custody taking the opportunity of executing the forsaid Caption with which he was intrusted againest the said Alexander Davidsone at that tyme the said Alexander does most causelessly and absurdly make the Complainer a pairtie in his Councill complaint tho he had the best ground to be the first Complainer, and wes all along a prisoner himselfe and therfor the Complainer ought not only to be assolzied from the forsaid malicious complaint befor the Lords of our privie Councill But lykewayes the said Alexander Davidsone ought to be punished to the terror of others to Committ the like in tyme coming as also Alexander Davidsone Decerned in Three thousand merks for the Complainers Damnages and expenses, and Seeing he has of Sett purpose cited severall persons particularlie Mr William Gordon in Towie Robert Gordon his Brother […] Bruce as pretended accomlpices of Design to exclude them from being witnesses for the Complainers tho they be at most the messengers assistants in execution of his office and consequently habill witnesses of his being deforced. And anent with certification as in the said lybell of Reconvention at more length is contained, Which two Lybells being upon the twentie third of november instance called in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill and the said Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoune of now of Geicht persuar in the principall Lybell and Defender in the Reconvention Compearing personally at the Barr with Sir David Cunninghame Sir John Ferguson Mr William Black Mr James Stewart Mr Thomas Hope Mr George and Mr James Dalrymples his Advocats and the saids Defenders in the principall lybell two wherof are persuars in the Reconvention COmpearing also personally at the Barr with Mr David Forbes Mr Mungo Carnagie Mr Francis Grant and Master James Grahame their advocats the advocats for the Defenders in the principall cause Gave in the answers following to the principall Lybell viz: The Lybell raised by Geicht against Coubairdie and Master Duff being So extravagantly groundless that on the contrary they had the best reason to have been the first Complainers, it may be requisite to premise some view of the true matter of fact, The estate of Geicht was formerly in the name of Gordon, and the old Lady with assistance of friends particularly of Cowbairdie having retreived it from Sinking Burdens Mr Davidson (whose Father is rich) suited in marriage the heirs of Gight, and (in the contract of marriage) upon the old Ladies making over her rights to her Daughter and her appearand husband he and his Father become obliedged to relieve the old Lady of the Debts which She had undertaken for the family, when the marriage had once followed Mr Davidsone now of Gicht and his Father forget to pay the Debts that the old Lady might be Stressed for them, and least they Should be charged on the Contract for her relief they (under pretence of friendship and Communing) prevail with Cowbairdie to gett from him the old Ladies Double of the Contract which he had borrowed from her upon receipt, and once having gott it would never restore it, notwtisthanding of all the argyments of intreaty and honour for doing that justice, In the mean tyme the old Lady and Major Generall Buchan her husband (being Stressed for great Debts of the family and wanting to Contract which was the mean of their Relief) obtain two Decreits of Exhibition of this Contract in foro againest Cowbairdie on the last wherof he was taken by Caption be Mr Duff messenger in September last while Cowbairdie was in the Messengers hands at Milton of Fyvie in his way to prison Gight (whose house is only some miles distant from that place) comes to them and pretending the greatest Concern imaginable that Cowbairdie Should Suffer upon his account, prevailes with Mr Duff that he Should go and interceed with the old Lady and her Husband (who also were not far from that place) to give a fortnights forbearance to Cowbairdie upon the said Gights being obliedged under whatever penalty to Registrat the Contract in the mean tyme or otherwayes to present the prisoner, Mr Duff leaving Cowbairdie on parroll of honour not to escape goes and obtains the old Ladies consent to which her husband agreed, But on his return to Miltoun of Fyvie, Gight revokes all that he had promised when he found that the proposall had been accorded to, In the mean tyme Patrik Gordon a Creditor of the family, and nephew to Cowbairdie having accidentally arrived at that place and fearing that Gight who would not perform for Cowbairdie what was So easily in his power, would much less pay ane ordinary Debt of the family he thus abstracting the Contract which obliedged him therunto, as also ther being a rumour that the forsaid Contract was Destroyed the said Patrick Gordon being Creditor of the family and having obtained Decreit had a Caption againest Gight for about one hunder pound Sterling, calls Mr Duff the messenger aside puts the Caption in his hand, and orders him to doe his Duty in putting the Same in execution least ther might not be Such opportunitie therafter for Gight had formerlie fled into England for eviting these Debts, that the old Ladie and her husband might be forced to pay them, Mr Duff the messenger could not refuse master Gordons imployment but in the mean tyme ther is a message as from the young Lady Gight that if the Company would come with her husband to the house, the whole matter might be accomodat upon which Mr Duff ventured to carrie Cowbairdie his prisoner thither upon Saturdayes afternoone, but when come ther Gight would give nothing except an appearance of a kindly intertainment, wherupon Gight going out with them to horse, Mr Duff the messenger (fearing that he might be lyable for the Debt if he did not take Gight who might again runn into England) in her Majesties name3 executs Mr Gordons Caption against Gight, who offered to resist by drawing his Sword and calling to his Servants, But that Deforcement becoming ineffectuall the two prisoners are carried back to Miltoun of Fyvie that Night, That Mr Gordons Caption was at first execute upon Saturday, and did not at all incroach upon the Sabbath day, being at most, but about ten of the Cloack can be proven by witnesses beyond exception, Which Gight forseeing he has for Smotherin the truth if it were possible by his packt witnesses; pretended to Cite as pairties the Defenders most necessary witnesses, which abuse no doubt the Honorable Councill will redress, However the next day being the Sabbath, and that place of Miltoune of Fivy being within Gights own lands, wher the Tennents upon pretence of going to Church might conveen, and make a Disturbance for their Masters Liberation, Mr Duff the messenger did prudently, and necessarly go forward with his prisoners prisoners to the next Inns which was not far off, allowing to Gight to wear a Sword Still after the night of his first Capture, and ther they rested till the Sabbath was over, at Gights intreatie, not to be carried to prison he was continued for Munday and Tuesday that he might send for his friends, who having come to Towie (the place of tryst) they offer a totall accommodation, not only as to Mr Gordons Debt, but lykewise for Cowbairdies Releasment that being a fitt opportunitie for effectuating what Gights honour so much stood bound for, besides his legall obliedgment especially such persons of honour being present as the Earle of Aberdeen and his son my Lord Haddo who did interpose wherupon its agreed that the Earle of Abredein Should pay Mr Gordons Debt, and that George Davidsone of Carnbroge Gights uncle Should be Cautioner, that the Contract Should be registrat and the old Lady Gight with her Husbands Discharge of the exhibition should be obtained to Cowbairdie under Such penalties as were competent wher ther had been so manie former Disappointments, as also Gight did undertake the payment of the Missengers Dues both for the Caption againest himself and the other which had been execute againest himself and the other which had been execute againest Cowbairdie on his Default and account upon which both prisoners were dismissed, and Gight therafter homologat the agreement, by causing actually registrat the Contract and offer payment of the expensses, But upon inspection of the principall Contract in the Register, it being discovered that ther was a most criminall vitiation made therin Gight and his Fathers bethink themselves how to ballance or Drown the clamour heirof, and the method they fall upon is, That they raise a Councill complaint lybelling on unwarrantable executing of a Caption upon the Sabbath morning, a riotous convocation of the Leiges and extortion of Bonds and Concluding that these Should be given back and the actors punished especially with paying of a vast damnages and lest any might be left to witnes the falsehood of these stories, Gight the pursuer calls as pairties not only the Messengers assistants, which he ordinarly carries with him, but likewise the other Gentlemen who were were accidentally present, yea, even Mr William Gordon in Towie, tho he was imployed as a Communer for Gight himselfe against which Cowbairdie and Mr Duff having raised a Reconvention on Deforcement withdrawing of wryts oppression and treachery, It is answered for the Defenders to the pursuers libell, that the Same is denyed as most calumnious in all the Circumstances and qualifications therof that have the least shaddow of relevancie in them the true matter of fact being as is above represented, viz: That the first capture was not upon the Sabbath day, which as it is not presumed, so that necessary witnesses being first past from, as pairties, or cleared, it is offered to be proven to have been upon Saturday, That nothing followed therafter, except what was necessary to repell the pursuers Deforcement, or requisit to secure him against making escape, That as a Messenger dared not refuse to do his Duty, when any of the Leiges charged him with a Caption, so it is most false that Gight was Detained prisoner after the money was payed, yea he was totallie dismissed before a farthing of it was payed, which was not till some dayes therafter, That ther was no extortion in obtaining the forsaids obliegements, but on the contrary as they were congruous and just in themselves, So they were proposed by the pursuer and his friends and have been homologat after his freedome as said is, which matter is depending befor the Lords of Session, that the Defenders are so farr from being Injurers that they are the only persons injured in the caise, For Cowbairdie by all the rules of honour honesty and Law ought not to have been betrayed to trouble, Expences of plea and prison, upon Gights account when Gight putting his hand in his pocket to give out the Contract (which was most unjustly retained againest faith and right given) would have put an end to the business and Mr Duff notwithstanding of his pains in procuring the old Ladies consent to Gights own overture, and his hazard in venturing to Gights own house ere the accomodation should quite break up, and his lenity and discretion therafter intreating Gight as a Gentleman and indulging him Severall dayes from being carried to prison in presentia amicorum for ending the bussiness, Is ill rewarded by Defamation Diversion and Charges of this most groundless and absurd pursuit, and the advocats for the forsaid Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoune now of Gight pursuer in the principall lybell and Defender in the Reconvention Gave in the answers following to the forsaids letters of reconvention, Bearing the said James Hamiltone and John Duff with others their accomplices being conveened before the privy Councill, at the instance of the said Alexander Davidsone for a most atrocious Ryot and manifest oppression upon the account of assaulting and attacking the said Alexander Davidsone in his house of Gight under Cloud and Silence of night by way of hamesucken, and putting a pretended Caption in execution againest him on the Lords day, and carrying him from one place to another and detaining him as in private prison and extorting from him an accepted precept for twentie peices to the Messenger after the Debt was paid, as also extorting from him bonds for great Sums of money in relation to other things that had no concern with the Caption, the said James Hamiltoun and John Duff has raised a most Groundless and calumnious Reconvention, and first wheras it is alleadged that the said John Duff having apprehended the said Alexander Davidsone with Caption at the instance of Patrick Gordon merchant in Aberdeen, upon Saturday the Sixteenth of September last, at the said Alexander Davidsons house of Gight, he, by himself with drawen sword, and his servants did deforce or offer to deforce the Messenger, It is answered primo, That as it is false in fact, that the said Alexander Davidsone did deforce the messenger with a drawn Sword, So that it is nowayes Competent, nor can the said Defence be admitted being Contrar to the said Alexander Davidsons Lybell which bears that the said James Hamiltoun and Duff the messenger having come to his house about ten of the Cloack at Night, they were most kyndly entertained at Supper albeit they did most barbarously and treacherously abuse and maletreat the said Alexander Davidsone in his house in manner mentioned in his own Lybell, contrair to all the rules of friendship and hospitality, Secundo if the said Alexander Davidson had drawn his Sword and offered any violence to the messenger as he did not, yet he might lawfullie have done it in his own Defence, Seeing it is positively offered to be proven, as is mentioned in his Lybell that Duff the Messenger did not offer to put the Caption in execution till two of the cloack in the Sunday morning at which tyme it was most unjust and unlawfull for him to have put any legall diligence in execution, and consequently he might be lawfullie resisted, and the said Alexander Davidson might justly have opposed the Messengers illegall violence by force, Tertio that alternative, that the said Alexander Davidson and his servants did offer to deforce the messenger is no wayes relevant for a pretended offer to do a crime is no cryme when the offer did not take effect, Secundo wheras it was aleladged that the said Alexander Davidsone had raised a Councill complaint againest the said James Hamilton and Duff the Messenger which is Said to be groundless and false in all its articles, It was answered that this being but a deniall of Alexander Davidsons lybell, and nothing againest the Relevancy the lybell ought to be admitted to his probation, and he positivly offered to prove the Same, Tertio wheras it was alleadged as an aggravation that ther being a Contract of marriage betwixt the said Alexander Davidson and the heretrix of Gight by which he and his Father were obliedged to releive the old Lady Gight of the Debts of the family the said James Hamilton having borrowed the Double of that Contract from the old Lady, and lent it to the said Alexander Davidsone or his Father, wherupon the old Lady and Major Generall Buchan her Husband were distressed for many Debts of the family, and they having obtained Decreit againest the Said James Hamilton for exhibiting and delivering of the Said Contract, and yet notwithstanding the Said Alexander Davidson doth Still retain the Samen, and at last the said James Hamilton being taken with Caption and in his way to prison having called at the said Alexander Davidsone house upon the Sixteenth of December last, and Duff the Messenger taking the opportunity to execute ane other Caption againest the Said Alexander Davidson he the Said Alexander did conveen the Said James Hamiltoun in the Councill Complaint againest the Messenger and others, It was answered that the said pretended aggravation was altogether groundless, for First It was most calumnious that either the said Alexander Davidsone or his Father did borrow the Said Contract from James Hamiltown, Secundo albeit the Said Alexander Davidson had the Said Contract in his Custodie, and that the old Lady Gight had obtained a Decreit againest James Hamiltoun for exhibition and delivery therof yet neither Alexander Davidson nor his Father were any wayes concerned in that matter, Tertio as to what was lybelled in relation to the said Alexander Davidson or his Father having of the Contract and ther not giving it up to the said James Hamilton It was properly a matter of civill right, and did not inferr any cryme and so could not be Sustained So much as ane aggravation of the said James Hamilton and Duff the messengers groundless Complaint Quarto what was mentioned in the said James Hamilton and Duffs Lybell in Relation to the Said Contract is altogether extrinsick to said Alexander Davidsons complaint againest them, which is for a manifest ryot, violence and oppression for albeit the said Alexander Davidson had keeped up the said Contract, yet that was no ground for the said James Hamilton, but a great aggravation of their cryme to have concurred with Duff the Messenger, to put the Caption for a Debt in execution at an unlawfull tyme and to beat and abuse the said Alexander Davidson in his own house, which was his Sanctuary, especially after they had been so civilly and kyndly intertained by him the night before, far less that he Should have concurred with the Messenger to extort from the Said Alexander an accepted precept to the Messenger, upon the pretences of expences after the Debt was payed, and by force and violence to have extorted bonds for exhibiting and delivery of the said Contract upon great penalties ther being no Sentences or Dilligences againest him for that effect, and the said Mr William Gordon of Towie Robert Gordon his Brother and […] Bruce are justly conveened as pairties who not only concurred as Accomplices with the Said James Hamilton and Duff, but also were the principall actors who attacked the said Alexander Davidson with cocked pistolls, and laid violent hands on him and beat him to the effusion of his blood, brook his sword in the scabbert and threatned to tread him under their feet, so that the said James Hamilton and Duff the messenger and ther saids accomplices being guilty of a most attrocious ryot, violence and oppression committed by them upon the person of the said Alexander Davidson, and art and part of the Samen in manner lybelled the said Alexander Davidsons Complaint ought to be admitted to probation, and he assoilzied from the said James Hamilton and Duff the messengers groundless and calumnious complaint, as the said answers bears, And the forsaid principall Lybell with the answers made therto by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger with the forsaid Lybell of Reconvention and answers made therto by the said Alexander Davidson being all read in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, and both pairties Lawiers heard at the Barr and removed, The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by their Interloquitor the twentie third day of november instant admitted the Lybells to probation, and the witnesses for both pairties being called Such of them as are marked in the roll present Compeiring at the Barr Did make faith, The Councill nominats and appoints the Earles of Lauderdale Leven and Northesk Collingtoun and the Lord provost of Edinburgh to be a Committie to examine the witnesses, and Recommends to the said Committy to meet to morrow morning at ten acloack in the fornoon and Declares any three a quorum and to report, and grants to both pairties Letters of Second dilligence by Caption againest the absent witnesses as marked in the roll and not Compeiring, and assignes the […] day of […] next to come for that effect, But in respect the pursuer in the principall Lybell who is Defender in the Reconvention hes Cited the persons following as pairties in his principall Lybell, who are cited as witnesses for the saids pursuars in the Reconvention therby to prevent ther being adduced as necessary witnesses therin viz Master William Gordon in Towie Mr Francis Bruce merchant in Edinburgh Robert Gordon in Kinghorne John Broun his Servant Robert Watt Servitor to Patrick Gordon of Samphfoord Merchant in Aberdein Andrew Muir and Patrick Wilsone Servitors to the said John Duff, Therfore the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill Doe heirby Recommend to the Said Committy to receive the oaths and testimonies of Such witnesses as the pursuer in the principall Lybell Shall condescend on for proving the fornamed persons or any of them pairties in his principall lybell, and in caice no probation or evidence appear againest them or any of them to be pairtties, that then the said Committy receive them as witnesses for the pursuars in the Reconvention who are Defenders in the principall Lybell, and purge them of partiall Councill and malice and ordains the witnesses cited for the pursuar in the principall lybell to be at Liberty and have their full freedome, and the said Committie or their quorum having mett upon the twentie fourth day of November instant and having called in one of Gights Witnesses who being Solemnlie Sworn purged of partiall Councill and interrogat Deponed as his Deposition extant in proces bears. Therafter ther being objections offered by the Defenders in the principall lybell againest Some others of Gights witnesses which the Committie referred to the Councill, Ther was a memoriall given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by the said Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun now of Gight, Narrating as follow’s in the proces depending befor the privie Councill att the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newyoun now of Gight againest the said James Hamilton John Duff Mr William and Robert Gordons […] Bruce and others Their Lordships appoynted a Committie to examine the witnesses upon the lybell, and in caise by the probation the Committie Should find, that nothing was proven againest the said Mr William and Robert Gordons or […] Bruce that than the Committie Should admitt them as witnesses in the Reconvention, The Committie having mett, and the witnesses being called in, it was objected that […] Gights Gardner and […] his servants could not be admitted as witnesses in regard ther was not a penurie of witnesses, ther being many more who could prove the Lybell, that were present, and more habite witnesses and it being answered, that the Cryme being4 committed at Gights house in the Dead and Silence of the Night, ther is none that could be witnesses, but Such as lived at the Gates, or were his Domesticks, The Committie inclined to examine the witnesses, But the Defenders were So tenacious, as to plead that the Committie would report the objection to the Councill, which they acquiesced to do next Councill day, Their Lordships are therfor humbly desired to Consider that its impossible for Gight to prove his Lybell, but by those verie persons who live at his Gates, or in his house, ther being none else present at his maletreatment but the Defenders themselves, who are conveened by him, and as to the pretence that ther are severall other witnesses cited, these witnesses are such who can only prove the detaining of Gight prisoner, and carrying of him from place to place on the Sabbath day, and the other articles lybelled, but were not present when he was first apprehended, Especially Seeing that it is a certain rule in Law, that any mans Servants may be admitted witnesses in Domestick Crimes, in that case they being necessary witnesses, as for instance, if any man Should be assasinat in his house, the only proper witnesses that could prove this are his Servants, and in the case of hamsucken, when any man is assaulted in his house under cloud and silence of Night as this was, it is the constant practice both befor the Councill and justice Court, to allow Servants to be admitted witnesses both men and women, because in that case they are absolutly necessary witnesses, and the particulars lybelled in this Complaint, upon which the Crime principally depends, was the assaulting and attacking Gight at his house and Gate under cloud and silence of night, as the said Memoriall bears, Lykeas ther was objections given in by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff, againest Richard Melvill William Henrie, and Jannet Black witnesses offered by Alexander Davidson of Gight in his proces befor the privie Councill, againest them, Representing as follows, The honorable Lords might well remember that it was plead for Cowbairdie and Mr Duff who are the persons only aimed at by the pursuer, that he had industriously cited all the Gentelmen and their Servants, who were accidentally ther as pairties therby to deprive the Saids Cowbairdie and Mr Duff of the benefite of their Depositions in their Exculpation, and this contrivance did plainly appear by their Conduct before the Comity for when Gights oath of Calumnie was Demanded by the forsaid Gentlemens Procurators the Parties themselves also Urging it, he did absolutly Shift and Declyne to give it alleading that it was not Compitent to crave his oath of Calumnie their, it not haveing been craved at the Councill and that the Councill only Could ordain him to Give his oath of Calumnie although it be Against all reason that any person Should pretend to prove a crime against his Nighbour without purging himself of Calumnie and the Law allows of that oath In ay pairt of the proces the nixt Stept he makes he offers his own Meniall and Domestick servants as witnesses, againest whom it was objected, that they being Miniall servants, the Law did reprobate their Testimonies, and being replyed, that servants are admitted in Domestick Crimes, which was the pursuars case, The pretended illegall Caption being in his own house under Cloud of night, and therfor could only be proven by his servants and family, To which it was answered that the priviledge of receiving unhabill witnesses Such as Servants in Domestick Crimes, is only admitted in the case when ther is no other habill and unsuspect witnesses present, than all the men servants he offers so that he can never be allowed to prove an pretended Crime againest Gentlemen, alleadged committed on him at his own gate, by his Domesticks, when the said Crime was alleadged by himselfe to be committed on him at his own gate in the Sight of five habil and indifferent witnesses, three of whom viz Adam Panton in Little Gight […] Cassie in Stonhouse of Gight, and […] Davidsone of Cairnbrogie Uncle to Gight, are witnesses beyond exception and ther being on the other hand five more cited by Cowbairdie in his exculpation, besides Mr Duffs assistance, viz Mr William Gordon in Towie, Robert Gordon in Kinghorny Francis Bruce Merchant in Edinburgh, Robert Watt, Servitor to Patrick Gordon of Sandfoord, and John Broun Servitor to the above designed Robert Gordon all persons present at the pretended ryot, besides Mr Duff and his ordinary assistants and witnesses all which persons of integrity and knowen Reputation are cited by the pursuar as pairties and accessaries to the pretended ryot, although they had no manner of accession therto, on purpose to preclude the Defenders from the benefite of their Depositions, and would prove the forsaid pretended accession by Domesticks, which the Law does Still reprobate, except in the caise wher ther are no other witnesses present, This was not a Domestick Crime that was lybelled, but the question was anent the legallity of the executing of the Caption in which the messenger and his witnesses in the execution are testes instrumentury et necessary, and therfor they can never be casten as pairtties and the pursuars design of making the whole persons present who are cited for the Defender pairties, except his own Uncle, and his obstinatly refusing at the Committie, to allow any of the unsuspect and habile witnesses to Depone and Shifting and refusing to purge himself of Calumnies is so evident a Contrivance that it is confidently hoped that the Lords of Councill will never allow any of his Domesticks to Depone, in respect ther are four or five unsuspect habill witnesses present at the pretended ryot, and who are cited by the pursuar himselfe, as the saids objections also bears which memoriall and objections being upon the twentie eight day of november instant read in presence of the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, and they having considered the same The Saids Lords appoynted and ordained the said Alexander Davidson of Newtoun to give his oath of Calumnie in the said proces befor the said Committie and therafter Recommends to the Said Committie formerly appoynted therin to examine Adam Panton in Little Gight, and […] Davidson in Carnbrogie witnesses for the said Davidson of Gight, and in case it appear by ther oaths and testimonies that they were present all the tyme lybelled than the saids Lords have found and heirby finds that ther is no penury of witnesses, and that Gights miniall and Domestick servants ought not to be received as witnesses for him in the forsaid proces, But in caice it do not appear, appoynts his Domestick Servants to be received and Recommends to the said Committie to meet to morrow at eleven acloack in the fornoon and to report, and the said Committie or their quorum having mett upon the twentie ninth of november instant, Did first of all in obedience to the forsaid Interloquitor take the said Alexander Davidsone of Gight his oath of Calumnie, as the Samen extant in proces bears. And therafter called for another of Gights witnesses, who being solemnlie sworn purged of partiall Councill and malice Deponed as his Deposition extant in proces also bears, Therafter the said Committie conforme to the two severall remitts to them theranent having examined Robert Mitchell in Ellon and Adam Panton in Little Gight and have considered their Depositions they are of opinion that the saids two witnesses proved nothing against Mr William Gordon in Towie Francis Bruce son to the Deceast Alexander Bruce in Birne, and the rest of the Defenders who are cited as pairties in the principall lybell and witnesses in the Reconvention to make them pairties (except only against the person aftermentioned) and that the said persons cited as pairties in the principall lybell ought to be received as witnesses in the Reconvention for Cowbairdie and Mr Duff, except only that the saids two witnesses prove something againest Robert Gordon Brother to the said Master William, But how far that can make him a pairtie the Committy Remitts the Consideration therof to the Councill and appoynts Cowbairdie and John Duffs witnesses to be receieved the morrow att ten a Cloack in the fornoon and are of opinion that ther is no penury of witnsses, and accordingly the Said Committie having mett this Day and called for severall of Cowbairdies and John Duffs witnesses, who Compeared and being solemnlie sworn purged of partiall Councill and interrogat upon their great oaths Deponed as their Depositions extant in proces lykewise bears. Therafter ther being a petition lykewayes presented to the Saids Lords by Alexander Davidson of Gight, Shewing that when the Complaint at the petitioners instance againest Cowbairdie, Mr Duff and their Accomplices, and the Reconvention at their instance againest me were read and Debate in their Lordships presence, that which the petitioner endeavoured to obviat was that Cowbairdie and Mr Duffs Servants and those other Accomplices who came along with them to his house Should not be admitted witnesses againest him being actuallie pairties and conveened as Such, Their Lordships pronounced a most just interloquitor in Relation to this poynt viz that his witnesses Should be first examined as to what they knew of Mr William and Robert Gordons and Francis Bruce ther actings or assistance in this matter, and if any thing were proven againest them they were not to be admitted as witnesses in the Reconvention, and if nothing were proven than they were to be Receaved when in the terms of this Interloquitor, the petitioner and his procurators Compeared befor the Commity wher the witnesses being to be examined, he did condescend on Such witnesses, first to be examined as he thought would be probation againest the saids masters Gordons and Bruce, against which witnesses Cowbairdie and Mr Duff did object that they were his own servants and therfor could not be received, but did urge that other witnesses whom they had cited might be examined, Wherupon Robert Mitchell on of his witnesses was called who being examined deponed somethings in relation to what happened at Gights gates the tyme lybelled and about the tyme of night but did not See all the particulars condescended on, nor know the Defenders except Robert Gordon, and Francis Bruce, as to whom he Depones on Some particulars as by his oath in the Clerks hands will appear, He being then obliedged to desyre his own Servants Should be examined, Because he knew ther were none other of his witnesses that could prove any thing againest those persons first to be considered, and therupon my procurators did make ane answer to the objection made againest them, viz that it was a Crime done done5 in the night time, and at his own gate wher ther was ane evident penury of witnesses none being present but the actors of the Crime and his own Servants, which the Lords of the Committie being pleased to report to their Lordships the matter was ordered to this effect that he Should give his oath of Calumnie as to the lybell againest Mrs William Robert Gordons and Bruce, and than their Lordships Recommends it to the Lords of the Committy to call and examine Adam Panton in Little Gight, and George6 Davidson of Cairnbrogie two of his witnesses and in case by their Depositions the Lords of the Committie Should find that they were both present at all the actions lybelled, Then their Lordships fand no penury and therfor his Servants not to be received, But in caice by their Depositions it Should appear they were not present, Than their Lordships as witnesses, In obedience to which interloquitor the Lords of the Committy having mett and examined Adam Panton the first witnes condescended on in the last Interloquitor who indeed did appear to be present at all the transactions lybelled, except that he was in the Stable, when John Duff, first Seased me, as his Deposition in the Clerks hands will testifie, Kairnbrogie being the nixt witnes condescended on He was called for whom a testificat was produced upon soul and conscience by phisitians and a minister that he was not able to come up, and farder upon his application the pursuars did judicially acknowledge that altho he were present he could prove nothing as to the Crimes committed at my gate at the tyme lybelled in regard he was in his bed befor they came to Gight and the tyme they went away, Wherupon I did expect that the alternative of their Lordships interloquitor was to take place so that his Servants Should be called and received, But in place therof the Lords of the Committie were pleased to find ther was no penury And therfore none of his miniall servants was to be received, and furder fand nothing was proven by his two witnesses examined againest Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce to inferr the Crimes lybelled, and therfor allowed them to be examined as witnesses in the Reconvention, wheranent they gave in a memoriall to the saids Lords of the Commity representing what was abovementioned, and Craving they would be7 pleased to reconsider their Interloquitor, to which they were pleased to give them this answer that they were not inclined to alter their Interloquitor But did allow them to apply to their Lordships and therupon Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce were examined, He is not at present to Complain upon the Honorable Lords of the Committy their Interloquitor and examining Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce he most begg leave to represent to their Lordships that his servants may be allowed to prove severall points of his lybell committed at his own gate againest the other Defenders Since these two alreadie examined are ignorant of several points therof, and its humbly contended that this is most agrieable to their Lordships former Interloquitor anent ther being examined, and were a great hardship upon their petitioners if the Same were not allowed Since the penury is evident these two alreadie deponing being almost in the Same caise as his own Servants the one of them to witt Mr Panton being his tennant and daylie attendant, and the other his Uncles Servant who was accidentally ther, and by their Depositions it will appear ther were severall things they were ignorant of, so that if the Defenders had not knowen that they would have objected againest them as well as the rest, and then he Should have been allowed no witnesses at all, and consequently no Crimes of the like nature could be proven but by the soiy criminis, which would be a most Dangerous consequence, And lastly what ever may be pretended againest his Deomstick Servants yet that can never exclude William Hendry his Gardner who hes a Distinct family of his own a peice distant from his house only labours his yards, and a little peice of ground to his own use in possesion wherof he has continued for fourteen years bypast and never received his entertainment in his family So that to exclude him were to frustrat him of all kind of probation which it is hoped their Lordships justice will not allow, and therfore Creaving their Lordships to consider the premisses and to allow the Committy to examine his haill other witnesses cited againest Cowbairdy and Mr Duff at least so many of them as their Lordships Shall think fitt, as the said petition bears And ther being lykewayes another petition given in and presented to the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger, Shewing that wher the petitioners were most unjustly persewed at the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun and now of Gight befor their Lordships for alleadged illegall and inhumane seizing of him in his house with Caption upon the seventeenth of September being Sundays morning after he had kyndlie entertained them in his house at Supper, In which most ungrate and calumnious Lybell he cites the haill Gentlemen and their Servants that were present as pairties and accessories to the pretended Crime on direct purpose to preclude their petitioners from proving of their Defence of exculpation and Recrimination, which being taken notice of in the pleading befor their Lordships They did most justly to Disapoint the pursuars their Designe appoynt the pursuar first to insist againest the Gentlemen and others Cited in their Reconvention, to the effect that if it did appear to the Lords of the Committie, that they had no accession to the said pretended Crime and violence they might be received witnesses in the Reconvention And accordingly the Committie having mett and taken the Deposition of one Mitchell who Deponed that he saw none of the witnesses cited in their Reconvention offer any violence to the said Laird of Gight, althrough he was present at the tyme of the said Capture and knew the said persons Gight did therafter offer to adduce his own servants as witnesses, and it being objected that they could not be received, as being inhabite by Law and it being replyed that the Cryme lybelled being Domestick Servants were priviledged as necessary witnesses, To which it being Duplyed that althroug Servants were admitted in Domestick Crimes yet that was only when the crime was Committed by Surprize on the family when ther were no other free and habite witnesses present, but, here the persons were Invited to Gights own house, and ther were other habite and unsuspect witnesses present, Therfor the servants could not be admitted, This objection being reported to their Lordships by the president of the Committy, their Lordships found that if ther were two free unsuspect witnesses who could Depone they were present, and that they Saw no violence Committed by the witnesses cited in the Reconvention, That ther Domesticks Should not be admitted, but that the witnesses Cited in the Reconvention Should be received although cited by the pursuar as pairties, The Lords of Committie did proceed according to their Lordships Recomendation and examined Adam Panton in Little Gight a person who was imployed by Gight himself in the whole matter who concurred with the former witnesses adduced by the pursuar, That he Saw no violence committed or offered by the witnesses Cited in the Reconvention to the Laird of Gight, and that they were present at the tyme of Mr Duffs seizing of the Laird of Gight, on the Caption lybelled on by the pursuers The Committie having Considered the two positive Depositions of the habile and unsuspect witnesses They did in the terms of their Lordships Recommendation find that the forsaid Gentlemen witnesses cited in the Reconvention were cleared from anie accession of the forsaid pretended Crime and refused to admitt the forsaid Domesticks as witnesses againest them, and admitted the witnesses cited by them, to depon, and They accordingly adduced Three, vis: Mr William Gordon a persone imployed as Mediator in the whole matter by Gight himself Mr Francis Bruce Merchant in Edinburgh a meer stranger in that Countrey who accidentally mett with them at Miltoun of Fyvie, and had not So much as acquaintance with anie of the pairties, and also Robert Watt servitor to Samfoord by whose Depositions, the whole tract and serious of this affair is made so evident and clear that Its humbly hoped their Lordships will See nothing remain upon the parte of the pursuar but the utmost ingratitude, Clamour Calumnie and unjustice, and their Lordships will also see by the Depositions that the Caption was also execute betwixt ten and eleven, and that the Samen was therafter Satisfied and transacted in the presence of the Right Honorable persons afternamed, viz The Earle of Aberdein and the Lord Haddo one of their Lordships number whose presence does exclude all pretence of force or extortion, and does Demonstrat the greatest Calumnie of this after pursuite, Their Lordships petitioners have severall other witnesses but Seeing the matter So fully cleared already, and Seeing the proces has been so grievous and expensive to them, and that the high Ingratitude and Injustice their petitioners have met with by the said Gight in all this matter, They humbly hope and begg their Lordships will instantly advise the probation, And therfor Craving their Lordships Seriously to consider the forsaid probation with the haill serious and tract of this affair and to modifie a sume of money to be payed to them for their expences and Damnadge which are verie great and heavie the said Injurious proces having been extreamly prejudiciall to them in asbtracting them from their necessars and important affairs, and otherwayes punish the pursuar as their Lordships In justice Shall think proper for preventing of Such gross oppression in time comeing, as the said petition lykewayes bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having this day proceeded to advyse, the mutuall proceses at the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun now of Gight, againest Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger et e contra and the lybells principall and Reconvention with answers therto and petitions by both pairties with the Depositions of the witnesses adduced for either pairtie in the said proces being all read, and the saids Lords having considered the same, Have found and heirby Finds the principall lybell at the instance of the said Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun not proven, and have Assoilzied and heirby assoilzies the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger and other Defenders therin from the haill poynts and articles therof, and have Declared and heirby Declares them quyt therof and free therfrae in all tyme coming and have Found and heirby Finds the forsaid lybell of Reconvention raised at the instance of the said James Hamiltoun of Cowbairdie and John Duff againest the said Alexander Davidsone Sufficiently proven, and both pairties being called into the barr The Lord Marques of Annandale Lord president of privie Councill Did intimat the Samen to them accordingly.

Edinburgh the 30th November 1704

D1704/11/131

Decreet

Decreit absolvitor John Duff and others against Davidsone of Newtoune

Anent the principall lybell or letters of Complaint raised and persewed befor the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill at the instance of Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun now of Geight, with concourse of Sir James Stewart Her Majesties advocat for her Highness interest, Makeing Mention that where by the Lawes of this and all other well governed Realms the publict peace ought to be be2 observed and all persons secure under the faith therof and protection of the Government, and that for any to brake the same by attacking and assaulting or injuring any other in their person or goods specially when done under a pretence and collour of friendship and a pretext of Law and legall dilligence and also on the Lords day when all execution even through legall ought to cease Is a high Cryme and ought to be Severly punished and the persone injured aught also to be restored and reponed againest all the effects and consequences therof Nevertheless It is of verity that James Hamilton of Cupbardie Mr William Gordon in Towie Robert Gordon his Brother […] Bruce and […] their servants and accomplices and John Duff messenger and […] Servitor to the Said John Duff Shaking off all regaird to our authority and Laws coming upon the Sixteenth of September last being Saturday at ten acloack at night to the house of Geicht, as if they had been friends and in a peaceable manner, were ther kyndlie entertained at Supper But after they had Stayed till two acloack on Sunday morning being the seventeenth of the said moneth and would needs be gone the Complainer did in Civility convoy them to their horses and than and ther the said James Hamiltoun of Cupbardie with Duff the messenger and other persons abovenamed Drew and cockt their pistolls and the messenger told Geicht that he was his prisoner at Patrick Gordons instance, Wherupon they all laid hold on him and took his sword from him braking it in the scabard and beat him to the great effusion of his bloud and the said Cupbardie threatned to Shoot on of Geichts Servants who offered to rescue him from their violence, and the saids persons having taken Geicht thus illegally on the Lords Day and violently and treacherously in manner forsaid They carried him as a prisoner all the Lords Day without regaird to the Divyne Service from place to place, and the said Cupbardie being Factor for the estate of Towie Did unlawfully Convocat the Tennents of Towie in arm’s to Destroy the Complainer, and thus carried him from one ale house to another Drinking Still on his Charges They keept him untill he gott a friend to pay the Debt in their pretended Caption, But when the Debt in the Caption was payed the said Messenger Duff would not pairt with the Complainer untill he extorted from him ane accepted bill of twentie pounds for his own Charges and when this was done the said Cupbardie told the Complainer (through he had not any ground or warrant for it) that he was Still his prisoner and Swore many bloody oaths he would not pairt with him but carry him wher no friend Should ever hear of him, Unless he would grant a bond of the like soume to Major Generall Buchan that within fourtein dayes he Should Registrat his Double of ane Contract of marriage and deliver ane Extract therof to the major Generall, Wherby the Complainer being Surprized, and Seeing a great many armed men upon the adjacent raising grounds ready to assist Cupbardie; and the Major Generall telling him that if he refused what was Demanded worse things might fall out, the Complainer and his Uncle Carnbryie were therby by violence and fear forced to grant the saids two bonds Lykeas all the tyme the Complainer was kept by them in Custody as a prisoner, They guarded him night and day with bended pistolls, By all which it is evident the said Hamiltoune of Cupbardie Mr William Gordon in Towie and Robert Gordon his Brother with the other persons abovenamed and Duff the Messenger are all and each of them Guiltie airt and pairt of a violent breach of the peace and most attrocious ryot and oppression and of having Committed privatam Carcerem, and the other violences and injuries abovementioned Which being proven befor the Lords of our privie Councill They ought not only to be Decerned in the Soume of Three thousand punds Scots of Damnages and expenses and ordained to redeliver the forsaid accepted bill and two bonds wrongously extorted as said is to be Cancelled, But also they ought to be farder punished in their persons and goods for the Crymes abovementioned to the example and terror of others to Committ the like in tyme coming, And anent the Chairge given to the Said Defender to have Compeired personally befor the Saids Lords at ane certain day bygone to have answered to the points of the said Complaint, and to have heard and Seen Such order and course taken theranent as the said Lords Should think fitt with certification as in the principall lybell or letters of complaint at more lenth is contained, And alse Anent the Lybell of Reconvention purchast and raised befor the saids Lords of Her Majesties privie Councill at the instance of the saids James Hamiltoun of Cupbairdie and John Duff messenger with concourse of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat for her Highness interest Making mention that where by the Laws of this and all well governed Nations the deforcing or attempting to deforce Messengers in the lawfull execution of their office, and yet Notwithstanding therof the traduceing the said Messenger and his assistants for doing their Duty by most calumnious Complaints befor the Lords of our privie Councill, as also the withdrawing and abstracting of wryts of greatest importance or being airt and pairt therof against faith and trust given to the Contrary, wherupon the intruster is Subjected to personall execution and many other hardships, and likewayes the defaming of her Majesties Leidges who are of unquestionable reputation with the odious Crymes of oppression and abuse of the Lords day, and the putting of them to unnecessary trouble and expenses theranent are Crimes of a high nature and Severly punishable, and the persons so injured ought to be redressed, Nevertheless It is of verity that Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun and now of Geicht is guilty of the forsaid Delinquencies insofarr as that the Complainer the said John Duff haveing upon the Sixteenth of September last being Saturday execute or offered to execute letters of Caption at the instance of Patrick Gordon merchant in Aberdein, in her Majesties name againest the said Alexander Davidsone He in Confidence of being at his own house of Gicht Did by himselfe with drawen Sword, and by his Servants Deforce or offer to Deforce this lawfull authoritie with violence and resistance as also the said Alexander Davidsone has taken the confidence to raise a Councill Complaint not only againest the said messenger but also against the Complainer the said James Hamiltoun of Copbairdie, which is most groundless and false in all the articles therof and which calumnie and Defamation is the more aggravat in regaird of the particulars following, Viz that the said Complainer hes been most notoriously abused by the said Alexander Davidsone his Father and others for his behove (with whom he is airt and pairt) insofarr as ther being a Contract of marriage betwixt the Said Alexander and the Heretrix of Gicht in which Alexander and his Father were bound to releive (upon a profitable translation) the old Lady Geicht, off the Debts of the family the Comapliner the said Hamiltoun of Cowbardie borroued the old Ladies Double of that Contract, and under the greatest appearance of friendship did Lend the Same to the said Alexander or his Father for his behove, Wherupon the old Ladie and Major Generall Buchan her husband being Distressed for many Debts of the family by Such Creditors as the said Alexander and his Father did most inhumanly hund out while they retained the Contract which obliedged them in relief of the Same as aforsaid having pursued the Complainer in ane Exhibition and obtained two Decreets in foro against the Complainer after he had made many instances to the said Alexander and his Father for freeing him by producing the forsaid Contract they most treacherously and ungratefully did keep the same up both from the Complainer and from the Major Generall and his Lady who prosecute the exhibition till at last the Complainer being taken with Caption and in his way to prison having called at the said Alexanders house on the Sixteenth day of September last (the Complainer being taken with Caption) in order to his make his last intreatie of his Liberating the Complainer by Delivering up the forsaid Contract and the Messenger who had the Complainer in Custody taking the opportunity of executing the forsaid Caption with which he was intrusted againest the said Alexander Davidsone at that tyme the said Alexander does most causelessly and absurdly make the Complainer a pairtie in his Councill complaint tho he had the best ground to be the first Complainer, and wes all along a prisoner himselfe and therfor the Complainer ought not only to be assolzied from the forsaid malicious complaint befor the Lords of our privie Councill But lykewayes the said Alexander Davidsone ought to be punished to the terror of others to Committ the like in tyme coming as also Alexander Davidsone Decerned in Three thousand merks for the Complainers Damnages and expenses, and Seeing he has of Sett purpose cited severall persons particularlie Mr William Gordon in Towie Robert Gordon his Brother […] Bruce as pretended accomlpices of Design to exclude them from being witnesses for the Complainers tho they be at most the messengers assistants in execution of his office and consequently habill witnesses of his being deforced. And anent with certification as in the said lybell of Reconvention at more length is contained, Which two Lybells being upon the twentie third of november instance called in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill and the said Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoune of now of Geicht persuar in the principall Lybell and Defender in the Reconvention Compearing personally at the Barr with Sir David Cunninghame Sir John Ferguson Mr William Black Mr James Stewart Mr Thomas Hope Mr George and Mr James Dalrymples his Advocats and the saids Defenders in the principall lybell two wherof are persuars in the Reconvention COmpearing also personally at the Barr with Mr David Forbes Mr Mungo Carnagie Mr Francis Grant and Master James Grahame their advocats the advocats for the Defenders in the principall cause Gave in the answers following to the principall Lybell viz: The Lybell raised by Geicht against Coubairdie and Master Duff being So extravagantly groundless that on the contrary they had the best reason to have been the first Complainers, it may be requisite to premise some view of the true matter of fact, The estate of Geicht was formerly in the name of Gordon, and the old Lady with assistance of friends particularly of Cowbairdie having retreived it from Sinking Burdens Mr Davidson (whose Father is rich) suited in marriage the heirs of Gight, and (in the contract of marriage) upon the old Ladies making over her rights to her Daughter and her appearand husband he and his Father become obliedged to relieve the old Lady of the Debts which She had undertaken for the family, when the marriage had once followed Mr Davidsone now of Gicht and his Father forget to pay the Debts that the old Lady might be Stressed for them, and least they Should be charged on the Contract for her relief they (under pretence of friendship and Communing) prevail with Cowbairdie to gett from him the old Ladies Double of the Contract which he had borrowed from her upon receipt, and once having gott it would never restore it, notwtisthanding of all the argyments of intreaty and honour for doing that justice, In the mean tyme the old Lady and Major Generall Buchan her husband (being Stressed for great Debts of the family and wanting to Contract which was the mean of their Relief) obtain two Decreits of Exhibition of this Contract in foro againest Cowbairdie on the last wherof he was taken by Caption be Mr Duff messenger in September last while Cowbairdie was in the Messengers hands at Milton of Fyvie in his way to prison Gight (whose house is only some miles distant from that place) comes to them and pretending the greatest Concern imaginable that Cowbairdie Should Suffer upon his account, prevailes with Mr Duff that he Should go and interceed with the old Lady and her Husband (who also were not far from that place) to give a fortnights forbearance to Cowbairdie upon the said Gights being obliedged under whatever penalty to Registrat the Contract in the mean tyme or otherwayes to present the prisoner, Mr Duff leaving Cowbairdie on parroll of honour not to escape goes and obtains the old Ladies consent to which her husband agreed, But on his return to Miltoun of Fyvie, Gight revokes all that he had promised when he found that the proposall had been accorded to, In the mean tyme Patrik Gordon a Creditor of the family, and nephew to Cowbairdie having accidentally arrived at that place and fearing that Gight who would not perform for Cowbairdie what was So easily in his power, would much less pay ane ordinary Debt of the family he thus abstracting the Contract which obliedged him therunto, as also ther being a rumour that the forsaid Contract was Destroyed the said Patrick Gordon being Creditor of the family and having obtained Decreit had a Caption againest Gight for about one hunder pound Sterling, calls Mr Duff the messenger aside puts the Caption in his hand, and orders him to doe his Duty in putting the Same in execution least ther might not be Such opportunitie therafter for Gight had formerlie fled into England for eviting these Debts, that the old Ladie and her husband might be forced to pay them, Mr Duff the messenger could not refuse master Gordons imployment but in the mean tyme ther is a message as from the young Lady Gight that if the Company would come with her husband to the house, the whole matter might be accomodat upon which Mr Duff ventured to carrie Cowbairdie his prisoner thither upon Saturdayes afternoone, but when come ther Gight would give nothing except an appearance of a kindly intertainment, wherupon Gight going out with them to horse, Mr Duff the messenger (fearing that he might be lyable for the Debt if he did not take Gight who might again runn into England) in her Majesties name3 executs Mr Gordons Caption against Gight, who offered to resist by drawing his Sword and calling to his Servants, But that Deforcement becoming ineffectuall the two prisoners are carried back to Miltoun of Fyvie that Night, That Mr Gordons Caption was at first execute upon Saturday, and did not at all incroach upon the Sabbath day, being at most, but about ten of the Cloack can be proven by witnesses beyond exception, Which Gight forseeing he has for Smotherin the truth if it were possible by his packt witnesses; pretended to Cite as pairties the Defenders most necessary witnesses, which abuse no doubt the Honorable Councill will redress, However the next day being the Sabbath, and that place of Miltoune of Fivy being within Gights own lands, wher the Tennents upon pretence of going to Church might conveen, and make a Disturbance for their Masters Liberation, Mr Duff the messenger did prudently, and necessarly go forward with his prisoners prisoners to the next Inns which was not far off, allowing to Gight to wear a Sword Still after the night of his first Capture, and ther they rested till the Sabbath was over, at Gights intreatie, not to be carried to prison he was continued for Munday and Tuesday that he might send for his friends, who having come to Towie (the place of tryst) they offer a totall accommodation, not only as to Mr Gordons Debt, but lykewise for Cowbairdies Releasment that being a fitt opportunitie for effectuating what Gights honour so much stood bound for, besides his legall obliedgment especially such persons of honour being present as the Earle of Aberdeen and his son my Lord Haddo who did interpose wherupon its agreed that the Earle of Abredein Should pay Mr Gordons Debt, and that George Davidsone of Carnbroge Gights uncle Should be Cautioner, that the Contract Should be registrat and the old Lady Gight with her Husbands Discharge of the exhibition should be obtained to Cowbairdie under Such penalties as were competent wher ther had been so manie former Disappointments, as also Gight did undertake the payment of the Missengers Dues both for the Caption againest himself and the other which had been execute againest himself and the other which had been execute againest Cowbairdie on his Default and account upon which both prisoners were dismissed, and Gight therafter homologat the agreement, by causing actually registrat the Contract and offer payment of the expensses, But upon inspection of the principall Contract in the Register, it being discovered that ther was a most criminall vitiation made therin Gight and his Fathers bethink themselves how to ballance or Drown the clamour heirof, and the method they fall upon is, That they raise a Councill complaint lybelling on unwarrantable executing of a Caption upon the Sabbath morning, a riotous convocation of the Leiges and extortion of Bonds and Concluding that these Should be given back and the actors punished especially with paying of a vast damnages and lest any might be left to witnes the falsehood of these stories, Gight the pursuer calls as pairties not only the Messengers assistants, which he ordinarly carries with him, but likewise the other Gentlemen who were were accidentally present, yea, even Mr William Gordon in Towie, tho he was imployed as a Communer for Gight himselfe against which Cowbairdie and Mr Duff having raised a Reconvention on Deforcement withdrawing of wryts oppression and treachery, It is answered for the Defenders to the pursuers libell, that the Same is denyed as most calumnious in all the Circumstances and qualifications therof that have the least shaddow of relevancie in them the true matter of fact being as is above represented, viz: That the first capture was not upon the Sabbath day, which as it is not presumed, so that necessary witnesses being first past from, as pairties, or cleared, it is offered to be proven to have been upon Saturday, That nothing followed therafter, except what was necessary to repell the pursuers Deforcement, or requisit to secure him against making escape, That as a Messenger dared not refuse to do his Duty, when any of the Leiges charged him with a Caption, so it is most false that Gight was Detained prisoner after the money was payed, yea he was totallie dismissed before a farthing of it was payed, which was not till some dayes therafter, That ther was no extortion in obtaining the forsaids obliegements, but on the contrary as they were congruous and just in themselves, So they were proposed by the pursuer and his friends and have been homologat after his freedome as said is, which matter is depending befor the Lords of Session, that the Defenders are so farr from being Injurers that they are the only persons injured in the caise, For Cowbairdie by all the rules of honour honesty and Law ought not to have been betrayed to trouble, Expences of plea and prison, upon Gights account when Gight putting his hand in his pocket to give out the Contract (which was most unjustly retained againest faith and right given) would have put an end to the business and Mr Duff notwithstanding of his pains in procuring the old Ladies consent to Gights own overture, and his hazard in venturing to Gights own house ere the accomodation should quite break up, and his lenity and discretion therafter intreating Gight as a Gentleman and indulging him Severall dayes from being carried to prison in presentia amicorum for ending the bussiness, Is ill rewarded by Defamation Diversion and Charges of this most groundless and absurd pursuit, and the advocats for the forsaid Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoune now of Gight pursuer in the principall lybell and Defender in the Reconvention Gave in the answers following to the forsaids letters of reconvention, Bearing the said James Hamiltone and John Duff with others their accomplices being conveened before the privy Councill, at the instance of the said Alexander Davidsone for a most atrocious Ryot and manifest oppression upon the account of assaulting and attacking the said Alexander Davidsone in his house of Gight under Cloud and Silence of night by way of hamesucken, and putting a pretended Caption in execution againest him on the Lords day, and carrying him from one place to another and detaining him as in private prison and extorting from him an accepted precept for twentie peices to the Messenger after the Debt was paid, as also extorting from him bonds for great Sums of money in relation to other things that had no concern with the Caption, the said James Hamiltoun and John Duff has raised a most Groundless and calumnious Reconvention, and first wheras it is alleadged that the said John Duff having apprehended the said Alexander Davidsone with Caption at the instance of Patrick Gordon merchant in Aberdeen, upon Saturday the Sixteenth of September last, at the said Alexander Davidsons house of Gight, he, by himself with drawen sword, and his servants did deforce or offer to deforce the Messenger, It is answered primo, That as it is false in fact, that the said Alexander Davidsone did deforce the messenger with a drawn Sword, So that it is nowayes Competent, nor can the said Defence be admitted being Contrar to the said Alexander Davidsons Lybell which bears that the said James Hamiltoun and Duff the messenger having come to his house about ten of the Cloack at Night, they were most kyndly entertained at Supper albeit they did most barbarously and treacherously abuse and maletreat the said Alexander Davidsone in his house in manner mentioned in his own Lybell, contrair to all the rules of friendship and hospitality, Secundo if the said Alexander Davidson had drawn his Sword and offered any violence to the messenger as he did not, yet he might lawfullie have done it in his own Defence, Seeing it is positively offered to be proven, as is mentioned in his Lybell that Duff the Messenger did not offer to put the Caption in execution till two of the cloack in the Sunday morning at which tyme it was most unjust and unlawfull for him to have put any legall diligence in execution, and consequently he might be lawfullie resisted, and the said Alexander Davidson might justly have opposed the Messengers illegall violence by force, Tertio that alternative, that the said Alexander Davidson and his servants did offer to deforce the messenger is no wayes relevant for a pretended offer to do a crime is no cryme when the offer did not take effect, Secundo wheras it was aleladged that the said Alexander Davidsone had raised a Councill complaint againest the said James Hamilton and Duff the Messenger which is Said to be groundless and false in all its articles, It was answered that this being but a deniall of Alexander Davidsons lybell, and nothing againest the Relevancy the lybell ought to be admitted to his probation, and he positivly offered to prove the Same, Tertio wheras it was alleadged as an aggravation that ther being a Contract of marriage betwixt the said Alexander Davidson and the heretrix of Gight by which he and his Father were obliedged to releive the old Lady Gight of the Debts of the family the said James Hamilton having borrowed the Double of that Contract from the old Lady, and lent it to the said Alexander Davidsone or his Father, wherupon the old Lady and Major Generall Buchan her Husband were distressed for many Debts of the family, and they having obtained Decreit againest the Said James Hamilton for exhibiting and delivering of the Said Contract, and yet notwithstanding the Said Alexander Davidson doth Still retain the Samen, and at last the said James Hamilton being taken with Caption and in his way to prison having called at the said Alexander Davidsone house upon the Sixteenth of December last, and Duff the Messenger taking the opportunity to execute ane other Caption againest the Said Alexander Davidson he the Said Alexander did conveen the Said James Hamiltoun in the Councill Complaint againest the Messenger and others, It was answered that the said pretended aggravation was altogether groundless, for First It was most calumnious that either the said Alexander Davidsone or his Father did borrow the Said Contract from James Hamiltown, Secundo albeit the Said Alexander Davidson had the Said Contract in his Custodie, and that the old Lady Gight had obtained a Decreit againest James Hamiltoun for exhibition and delivery therof yet neither Alexander Davidson nor his Father were any wayes concerned in that matter, Tertio as to what was lybelled in relation to the said Alexander Davidson or his Father having of the Contract and ther not giving it up to the said James Hamilton It was properly a matter of civill right, and did not inferr any cryme and so could not be Sustained So much as ane aggravation of the said James Hamilton and Duff the messengers groundless Complaint Quarto what was mentioned in the said James Hamilton and Duffs Lybell in Relation to the Said Contract is altogether extrinsick to said Alexander Davidsons complaint againest them, which is for a manifest ryot, violence and oppression for albeit the said Alexander Davidson had keeped up the said Contract, yet that was no ground for the said James Hamilton, but a great aggravation of their cryme to have concurred with Duff the Messenger, to put the Caption for a Debt in execution at an unlawfull tyme and to beat and abuse the said Alexander Davidson in his own house, which was his Sanctuary, especially after they had been so civilly and kyndly intertained by him the night before, far less that he Should have concurred with the Messenger to extort from the Said Alexander an accepted precept to the Messenger, upon the pretences of expences after the Debt was payed, and by force and violence to have extorted bonds for exhibiting and delivery of the said Contract upon great penalties ther being no Sentences or Dilligences againest him for that effect, and the said Mr William Gordon of Towie Robert Gordon his Brother and […] Bruce are justly conveened as pairties who not only concurred as Accomplices with the Said James Hamilton and Duff, but also were the principall actors who attacked the said Alexander Davidson with cocked pistolls, and laid violent hands on him and beat him to the effusion of his blood, brook his sword in the scabbert and threatned to tread him under their feet, so that the said James Hamilton and Duff the messenger and ther saids accomplices being guilty of a most attrocious ryot, violence and oppression committed by them upon the person of the said Alexander Davidson, and art and part of the Samen in manner lybelled the said Alexander Davidsons Complaint ought to be admitted to probation, and he assoilzied from the said James Hamilton and Duff the messengers groundless and calumnious complaint, as the said answers bears, And the forsaid principall Lybell with the answers made therto by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger with the forsaid Lybell of Reconvention and answers made therto by the said Alexander Davidson being all read in presence of the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, and both pairties Lawiers heard at the Barr and removed, The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by their Interloquitor the twentie third day of november instant admitted the Lybells to probation, and the witnesses for both pairties being called Such of them as are marked in the roll present Compeiring at the Barr Did make faith, The Councill nominats and appoints the Earles of Lauderdale Leven and Northesk Collingtoun and the Lord provost of Edinburgh to be a Committie to examine the witnesses, and Recommends to the said Committy to meet to morrow morning at ten acloack in the fornoon and Declares any three a quorum and to report, and grants to both pairties Letters of Second dilligence by Caption againest the absent witnesses as marked in the roll and not Compeiring, and assignes the […] day of […] next to come for that effect, But in respect the pursuer in the principall Lybell who is Defender in the Reconvention hes Cited the persons following as pairties in his principall Lybell, who are cited as witnesses for the saids pursuars in the Reconvention therby to prevent ther being adduced as necessary witnesses therin viz Master William Gordon in Towie Mr Francis Bruce merchant in Edinburgh Robert Gordon in Kinghorne John Broun his Servant Robert Watt Servitor to Patrick Gordon of Samphfoord Merchant in Aberdein Andrew Muir and Patrick Wilsone Servitors to the said John Duff, Therfore the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill Doe heirby Recommend to the Said Committy to receive the oaths and testimonies of Such witnesses as the pursuer in the principall Lybell Shall condescend on for proving the fornamed persons or any of them pairties in his principall lybell, and in caice no probation or evidence appear againest them or any of them to be pairtties, that then the said Committy receive them as witnesses for the pursuars in the Reconvention who are Defenders in the principall Lybell, and purge them of partiall Councill and malice and ordains the witnesses cited for the pursuar in the principall lybell to be at Liberty and have their full freedome, and the said Committie or their quorum having mett upon the twentie fourth day of November instant and having called in one of Gights Witnesses who being Solemnlie Sworn purged of partiall Councill and interrogat Deponed as his Deposition extant in proces bears. Therafter ther being objections offered by the Defenders in the principall lybell againest Some others of Gights witnesses which the Committie referred to the Councill, Ther was a memoriall given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by the said Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun now of Gight, Narrating as follow’s in the proces depending befor the privie Councill att the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newyoun now of Gight againest the said James Hamilton John Duff Mr William and Robert Gordons […] Bruce and others Their Lordships appoynted a Committie to examine the witnesses upon the lybell, and in caise by the probation the Committie Should find, that nothing was proven againest the said Mr William and Robert Gordons or […] Bruce that than the Committie Should admitt them as witnesses in the Reconvention, The Committie having mett, and the witnesses being called in, it was objected that […] Gights Gardner and […] his servants could not be admitted as witnesses in regard ther was not a penurie of witnesses, ther being many more who could prove the Lybell, that were present, and more habite witnesses and it being answered, that the Cryme being4 committed at Gights house in the Dead and Silence of the Night, ther is none that could be witnesses, but Such as lived at the Gates, or were his Domesticks, The Committie inclined to examine the witnesses, But the Defenders were So tenacious, as to plead that the Committie would report the objection to the Councill, which they acquiesced to do next Councill day, Their Lordships are therfor humbly desired to Consider that its impossible for Gight to prove his Lybell, but by those verie persons who live at his Gates, or in his house, ther being none else present at his maletreatment but the Defenders themselves, who are conveened by him, and as to the pretence that ther are severall other witnesses cited, these witnesses are such who can only prove the detaining of Gight prisoner, and carrying of him from place to place on the Sabbath day, and the other articles lybelled, but were not present when he was first apprehended, Especially Seeing that it is a certain rule in Law, that any mans Servants may be admitted witnesses in Domestick Crimes, in that case they being necessary witnesses, as for instance, if any man Should be assasinat in his house, the only proper witnesses that could prove this are his Servants, and in the case of hamsucken, when any man is assaulted in his house under cloud and silence of Night as this was, it is the constant practice both befor the Councill and justice Court, to allow Servants to be admitted witnesses both men and women, because in that case they are absolutly necessary witnesses, and the particulars lybelled in this Complaint, upon which the Crime principally depends, was the assaulting and attacking Gight at his house and Gate under cloud and silence of night, as the said Memoriall bears, Lykeas ther was objections given in by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff, againest Richard Melvill William Henrie, and Jannet Black witnesses offered by Alexander Davidson of Gight in his proces befor the privie Councill, againest them, Representing as follows, The honorable Lords might well remember that it was plead for Cowbairdie and Mr Duff who are the persons only aimed at by the pursuer, that he had industriously cited all the Gentelmen and their Servants, who were accidentally ther as pairties therby to deprive the Saids Cowbairdie and Mr Duff of the benefite of their Depositions in their Exculpation, and this contrivance did plainly appear by their Conduct before the Comity for when Gights oath of Calumnie was Demanded by the forsaid Gentlemens Procurators the Parties themselves also Urging it, he did absolutly Shift and Declyne to give it alleading that it was not Compitent to crave his oath of Calumnie their, it not haveing been craved at the Councill and that the Councill only Could ordain him to Give his oath of Calumnie although it be Against all reason that any person Should pretend to prove a crime against his Nighbour without purging himself of Calumnie and the Law allows of that oath In ay pairt of the proces the nixt Stept he makes he offers his own Meniall and Domestick servants as witnesses, againest whom it was objected, that they being Miniall servants, the Law did reprobate their Testimonies, and being replyed, that servants are admitted in Domestick Crimes, which was the pursuars case, The pretended illegall Caption being in his own house under Cloud of night, and therfor could only be proven by his servants and family, To which it was answered that the priviledge of receiving unhabill witnesses Such as Servants in Domestick Crimes, is only admitted in the case when ther is no other habill and unsuspect witnesses present, than all the men servants he offers so that he can never be allowed to prove an pretended Crime againest Gentlemen, alleadged committed on him at his own gate, by his Domesticks, when the said Crime was alleadged by himselfe to be committed on him at his own gate in the Sight of five habil and indifferent witnesses, three of whom viz Adam Panton in Little Gight […] Cassie in Stonhouse of Gight, and […] Davidsone of Cairnbrogie Uncle to Gight, are witnesses beyond exception and ther being on the other hand five more cited by Cowbairdie in his exculpation, besides Mr Duffs assistance, viz Mr William Gordon in Towie, Robert Gordon in Kinghorny Francis Bruce Merchant in Edinburgh, Robert Watt, Servitor to Patrick Gordon of Sandfoord, and John Broun Servitor to the above designed Robert Gordon all persons present at the pretended ryot, besides Mr Duff and his ordinary assistants and witnesses all which persons of integrity and knowen Reputation are cited by the pursuar as pairties and accessaries to the pretended ryot, although they had no manner of accession therto, on purpose to preclude the Defenders from the benefite of their Depositions, and would prove the forsaid pretended accession by Domesticks, which the Law does Still reprobate, except in the caise wher ther are no other witnesses present, This was not a Domestick Crime that was lybelled, but the question was anent the legallity of the executing of the Caption in which the messenger and his witnesses in the execution are testes instrumentury et necessary, and therfor they can never be casten as pairtties and the pursuars design of making the whole persons present who are cited for the Defender pairties, except his own Uncle, and his obstinatly refusing at the Committie, to allow any of the unsuspect and habile witnesses to Depone and Shifting and refusing to purge himself of Calumnies is so evident a Contrivance that it is confidently hoped that the Lords of Councill will never allow any of his Domesticks to Depone, in respect ther are four or five unsuspect habill witnesses present at the pretended ryot, and who are cited by the pursuar himselfe, as the saids objections also bears which memoriall and objections being upon the twentie eight day of november instant read in presence of the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill, and they having considered the same The Saids Lords appoynted and ordained the said Alexander Davidson of Newtoun to give his oath of Calumnie in the said proces befor the said Committie and therafter Recommends to the Said Committie formerly appoynted therin to examine Adam Panton in Little Gight, and […] Davidson in Carnbrogie witnesses for the said Davidson of Gight, and in case it appear by ther oaths and testimonies that they were present all the tyme lybelled than the saids Lords have found and heirby finds that ther is no penury of witnesses, and that Gights miniall and Domestick servants ought not to be received as witnesses for him in the forsaid proces, But in caice it do not appear, appoynts his Domestick Servants to be received and Recommends to the said Committie to meet to morrow at eleven acloack in the fornoon and to report, and the said Committie or their quorum having mett upon the twentie ninth of november instant, Did first of all in obedience to the forsaid Interloquitor take the said Alexander Davidsone of Gight his oath of Calumnie, as the Samen extant in proces bears. And therafter called for another of Gights witnesses, who being solemnlie sworn purged of partiall Councill and malice Deponed as his Deposition extant in proces also bears, Therafter the said Committie conforme to the two severall remitts to them theranent having examined Robert Mitchell in Ellon and Adam Panton in Little Gight and have considered their Depositions they are of opinion that the saids two witnesses proved nothing against Mr William Gordon in Towie Francis Bruce son to the Deceast Alexander Bruce in Birne, and the rest of the Defenders who are cited as pairties in the principall lybell and witnesses in the Reconvention to make them pairties (except only against the person aftermentioned) and that the said persons cited as pairties in the principall lybell ought to be received as witnesses in the Reconvention for Cowbairdie and Mr Duff, except only that the saids two witnesses prove something againest Robert Gordon Brother to the said Master William, But how far that can make him a pairtie the Committy Remitts the Consideration therof to the Councill and appoynts Cowbairdie and John Duffs witnesses to be receieved the morrow att ten a Cloack in the fornoon and are of opinion that ther is no penury of witnsses, and accordingly the Said Committie having mett this Day and called for severall of Cowbairdies and John Duffs witnesses, who Compeared and being solemnlie sworn purged of partiall Councill and interrogat upon their great oaths Deponed as their Depositions extant in proces lykewise bears. Therafter ther being a petition lykewayes presented to the Saids Lords by Alexander Davidson of Gight, Shewing that when the Complaint at the petitioners instance againest Cowbairdie, Mr Duff and their Accomplices, and the Reconvention at their instance againest me were read and Debate in their Lordships presence, that which the petitioner endeavoured to obviat was that Cowbairdie and Mr Duffs Servants and those other Accomplices who came along with them to his house Should not be admitted witnesses againest him being actuallie pairties and conveened as Such, Their Lordships pronounced a most just interloquitor in Relation to this poynt viz that his witnesses Should be first examined as to what they knew of Mr William and Robert Gordons and Francis Bruce ther actings or assistance in this matter, and if any thing were proven againest them they were not to be admitted as witnesses in the Reconvention, and if nothing were proven than they were to be Receaved when in the terms of this Interloquitor, the petitioner and his procurators Compeared befor the Commity wher the witnesses being to be examined, he did condescend on Such witnesses, first to be examined as he thought would be probation againest the saids masters Gordons and Bruce, against which witnesses Cowbairdie and Mr Duff did object that they were his own servants and therfor could not be received, but did urge that other witnesses whom they had cited might be examined, Wherupon Robert Mitchell on of his witnesses was called who being examined deponed somethings in relation to what happened at Gights gates the tyme lybelled and about the tyme of night but did not See all the particulars condescended on, nor know the Defenders except Robert Gordon, and Francis Bruce, as to whom he Depones on Some particulars as by his oath in the Clerks hands will appear, He being then obliedged to desyre his own Servants Should be examined, Because he knew ther were none other of his witnesses that could prove any thing againest those persons first to be considered, and therupon my procurators did make ane answer to the objection made againest them, viz that it was a Crime done done5 in the night time, and at his own gate wher ther was ane evident penury of witnesses none being present but the actors of the Crime and his own Servants, which the Lords of the Committie being pleased to report to their Lordships the matter was ordered to this effect that he Should give his oath of Calumnie as to the lybell againest Mrs William Robert Gordons and Bruce, and than their Lordships Recommends it to the Lords of the Committy to call and examine Adam Panton in Little Gight, and George6 Davidson of Cairnbrogie two of his witnesses and in case by their Depositions the Lords of the Committie Should find that they were both present at all the actions lybelled, Then their Lordships fand no penury and therfor his Servants not to be received, But in caice by their Depositions it Should appear they were not present, Than their Lordships as witnesses, In obedience to which interloquitor the Lords of the Committy having mett and examined Adam Panton the first witnes condescended on in the last Interloquitor who indeed did appear to be present at all the transactions lybelled, except that he was in the Stable, when John Duff, first Seased me, as his Deposition in the Clerks hands will testifie, Kairnbrogie being the nixt witnes condescended on He was called for whom a testificat was produced upon soul and conscience by phisitians and a minister that he was not able to come up, and farder upon his application the pursuars did judicially acknowledge that altho he were present he could prove nothing as to the Crimes committed at my gate at the tyme lybelled in regard he was in his bed befor they came to Gight and the tyme they went away, Wherupon I did expect that the alternative of their Lordships interloquitor was to take place so that his Servants Should be called and received, But in place therof the Lords of the Committie were pleased to find ther was no penury And therfore none of his miniall servants was to be received, and furder fand nothing was proven by his two witnesses examined againest Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce to inferr the Crimes lybelled, and therfor allowed them to be examined as witnesses in the Reconvention, wheranent they gave in a memoriall to the saids Lords of the Commity representing what was abovementioned, and Craving they would be7 pleased to reconsider their Interloquitor, to which they were pleased to give them this answer that they were not inclined to alter their Interloquitor But did allow them to apply to their Lordships and therupon Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce were examined, He is not at present to Complain upon the Honorable Lords of the Committy their Interloquitor and examining Mr William Gordon and Francis Bruce he most begg leave to represent to their Lordships that his servants may be allowed to prove severall points of his lybell committed at his own gate againest the other Defenders Since these two alreadie examined are ignorant of several points therof, and its humbly contended that this is most agrieable to their Lordships former Interloquitor anent ther being examined, and were a great hardship upon their petitioners if the Same were not allowed Since the penury is evident these two alreadie deponing being almost in the Same caise as his own Servants the one of them to witt Mr Panton being his tennant and daylie attendant, and the other his Uncles Servant who was accidentally ther, and by their Depositions it will appear ther were severall things they were ignorant of, so that if the Defenders had not knowen that they would have objected againest them as well as the rest, and then he Should have been allowed no witnesses at all, and consequently no Crimes of the like nature could be proven but by the soiy criminis, which would be a most Dangerous consequence, And lastly what ever may be pretended againest his Deomstick Servants yet that can never exclude William Hendry his Gardner who hes a Distinct family of his own a peice distant from his house only labours his yards, and a little peice of ground to his own use in possesion wherof he has continued for fourteen years bypast and never received his entertainment in his family So that to exclude him were to frustrat him of all kind of probation which it is hoped their Lordships justice will not allow, and therfore Creaving their Lordships to consider the premisses and to allow the Committy to examine his haill other witnesses cited againest Cowbairdy and Mr Duff at least so many of them as their Lordships Shall think fitt, as the said petition bears And ther being lykewayes another petition given in and presented to the saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger, Shewing that wher the petitioners were most unjustly persewed at the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun and now of Gight befor their Lordships for alleadged illegall and inhumane seizing of him in his house with Caption upon the seventeenth of September being Sundays morning after he had kyndlie entertained them in his house at Supper, In which most ungrate and calumnious Lybell he cites the haill Gentlemen and their Servants that were present as pairties and accessories to the pretended Crime on direct purpose to preclude their petitioners from proving of their Defence of exculpation and Recrimination, which being taken notice of in the pleading befor their Lordships They did most justly to Disapoint the pursuars their Designe appoynt the pursuar first to insist againest the Gentlemen and others Cited in their Reconvention, to the effect that if it did appear to the Lords of the Committie, that they had no accession to the said pretended Crime and violence they might be received witnesses in the Reconvention And accordingly the Committie having mett and taken the Deposition of one Mitchell who Deponed that he saw none of the witnesses cited in their Reconvention offer any violence to the said Laird of Gight, althrough he was present at the tyme of the said Capture and knew the said persons Gight did therafter offer to adduce his own servants as witnesses, and it being objected that they could not be received, as being inhabite by Law and it being replyed that the Cryme lybelled being Domestick Servants were priviledged as necessary witnesses, To which it being Duplyed that althroug Servants were admitted in Domestick Crimes yet that was only when the crime was Committed by Surprize on the family when ther were no other free and habite witnesses present, but, here the persons were Invited to Gights own house, and ther were other habite and unsuspect witnesses present, Therfor the servants could not be admitted, This objection being reported to their Lordships by the president of the Committy, their Lordships found that if ther were two free unsuspect witnesses who could Depone they were present, and that they Saw no violence Committed by the witnesses cited in the Reconvention, That ther Domesticks Should not be admitted, but that the witnesses Cited in the Reconvention Should be received although cited by the pursuar as pairties, The Lords of Committie did proceed according to their Lordships Recomendation and examined Adam Panton in Little Gight a person who was imployed by Gight himself in the whole matter who concurred with the former witnesses adduced by the pursuar, That he Saw no violence committed or offered by the witnesses Cited in the Reconvention to the Laird of Gight, and that they were present at the tyme of Mr Duffs seizing of the Laird of Gight, on the Caption lybelled on by the pursuers The Committie having Considered the two positive Depositions of the habile and unsuspect witnesses They did in the terms of their Lordships Recommendation find that the forsaid Gentlemen witnesses cited in the Reconvention were cleared from anie accession of the forsaid pretended Crime and refused to admitt the forsaid Domesticks as witnesses againest them, and admitted the witnesses cited by them, to depon, and They accordingly adduced Three, vis: Mr William Gordon a persone imployed as Mediator in the whole matter by Gight himself Mr Francis Bruce Merchant in Edinburgh a meer stranger in that Countrey who accidentally mett with them at Miltoun of Fyvie, and had not So much as acquaintance with anie of the pairties, and also Robert Watt servitor to Samfoord by whose Depositions, the whole tract and serious of this affair is made so evident and clear that Its humbly hoped their Lordships will See nothing remain upon the parte of the pursuar but the utmost ingratitude, Clamour Calumnie and unjustice, and their Lordships will also see by the Depositions that the Caption was also execute betwixt ten and eleven, and that the Samen was therafter Satisfied and transacted in the presence of the Right Honorable persons afternamed, viz The Earle of Aberdein and the Lord Haddo one of their Lordships number whose presence does exclude all pretence of force or extortion, and does Demonstrat the greatest Calumnie of this after pursuite, Their Lordships petitioners have severall other witnesses but Seeing the matter So fully cleared already, and Seeing the proces has been so grievous and expensive to them, and that the high Ingratitude and Injustice their petitioners have met with by the said Gight in all this matter, They humbly hope and begg their Lordships will instantly advise the probation, And therfor Craving their Lordships Seriously to consider the forsaid probation with the haill serious and tract of this affair and to modifie a sume of money to be payed to them for their expences and Damnadge which are verie great and heavie the said Injurious proces having been extreamly prejudiciall to them in asbtracting them from their necessars and important affairs, and otherwayes punish the pursuar as their Lordships In justice Shall think proper for preventing of Such gross oppression in time comeing, as the said petition lykewayes bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having this day proceeded to advyse, the mutuall proceses at the instance of Alexander Davidson younger of Newtoun now of Gight, againest Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger et e contra and the lybells principall and Reconvention with answers therto and petitions by both pairties with the Depositions of the witnesses adduced for either pairtie in the said proces being all read, and the saids Lords having considered the same, Have found and heirby Finds the principall lybell at the instance of the said Alexander Davidsone younger of Newtoun not proven, and have Assoilzied and heirby assoilzies the said James Hamilton of Cowbairdie and John Duff messenger and other Defenders therin from the haill poynts and articles therof, and have Declared and heirby Declares them quyt therof and free therfrae in all tyme coming and have Found and heirby Finds the forsaid lybell of Reconvention raised at the instance of the said James Hamiltoun of Cowbairdie and John Duff againest the said Alexander Davidsone Sufficiently proven, and both pairties being called into the barr The Lord Marques of Annandale Lord president of privie Councill Did intimat the Samen to them accordingly.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 307v-319r.

2. Sic.

3. The word ‘name’ is an insertion.

4. The word ‘being’ is an insertion.

5. Sic.

6. Written over the name ‘John’.

7. The word ‘be’ is an insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 307v-319r.

2. Sic.

3. The word ‘name’ is an insertion.

4. The word ‘being’ is an insertion.

5. Sic.

6. Written over the name ‘John’.

7. The word ‘be’ is an insertion.

Sederunt, 30 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 17041

D1704/11/122

Sederunt

Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Craufurd; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Lord Advocat; Lord Enstruther; Lord Rankeilor; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fra: Montgomery; Laird of Carnwath; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 30th November 17041

D1704/11/122

Sederunt

Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Craufurd; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Dunmore; Lord Advocat; Lord Enstruther; Lord Rankeilor; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fra: Montgomery; Laird of Carnwath; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/28, 307v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 307v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 307v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 307v.

Act, 28 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 28th November 1704

D1704/11/111

Act

Act in favours of Hutchisone for transporting Whores

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by Captain William Hutcheson of the province of Mary Land Humblie Shewing that wher ther are twentie two women or therby imprisoned in the Correction house of Edinburgh, for thift or Whoredome as also six young boyes prisoners in the Tolbooth therof for picking of pockets and other such Crymes who have all freely and voluntarly of their own choise and consent agried to go along with the petition or to the said province of Maryland to be Servants ther, and the said magistrat his Subscription heirwith produced Doe testifie and Seeing the saids persons are for no use to the Countrey, and a burden to the good Toune of Edinburgh to maintain them, and therfor Craving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them by Captain William Hutchisone of the province of Mary Land and the samen being read in their presence the saids Lords Have allowed and heirby allowes the said Captain William Hutchison to transport to her Majesties plantations in America the persons whose names are Contained in the Lists given in to the Clerks of Councill and as after followes, Viz: John Thom son to James Thom Shoemaker in Glasgow Lauchlan McLean son to Allan McLean in the Isle of Mull, John Stewart son to Angus Stewart in Atholl Thomas Harvie son to James Harvie Maltman in Glasgow all prisoners in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh; Thomas Clerk Son to Thomas Clerk in New Castle and John Nicoll son to John Nicoll in Borrowstouness prisoners in the Correction house of Edinburgh Margaret Wallace Marjory Stewart Mary Gray Elizabeth Gordon Katharine Hagar Janet Ross Janet Robertson Margaret Fisher Bessie Donald Margaret Thomson Geills Baillie Katharin Livingstoun Agnes Kilpatrick Jannet Traill Hellen Allan Agnes Robertsone Sophia Vanheston Janet Toward Janet Gilchrist and Mary Hepburne prisoners in the said Correction house and all common whores and theives and Elizabeth Haliburton present prisoner in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh, and befor extracting heirof appoynts and ordains the said Captain William Hutchisone to give bond and find sufficient Caution acted in the books of privy Councill, that he shall not carry away nor transport any other persons (except these abovementioned whose names are contained in the saids Lists) to her majesties plantations in America and that under the penalty of one hunder pound Sterling in caise he transgress the premisses, and ordaines the magistrats of Edinburgh and Keepers of their prisons to Deliver the fornamed persons to the said Captain Hutchesone to be by him transported as said is upon his receipt to be given for them he alwayes alimenting them in the mean tyme.

Edinburgh the 28th November 1704

D1704/11/111

Act

Act in favours of Hutchisone for transporting Whores

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by Captain William Hutcheson of the province of Mary Land Humblie Shewing that wher ther are twentie two women or therby imprisoned in the Correction house of Edinburgh, for thift or Whoredome as also six young boyes prisoners in the Tolbooth therof for picking of pockets and other such Crymes who have all freely and voluntarly of their own choise and consent agried to go along with the petition or to the said province of Maryland to be Servants ther, and the said magistrat his Subscription heirwith produced Doe testifie and Seeing the saids persons are for no use to the Countrey, and a burden to the good Toune of Edinburgh to maintain them, and therfor Craving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the petition given in to them by Captain William Hutchisone of the province of Mary Land and the samen being read in their presence the saids Lords Have allowed and heirby allowes the said Captain William Hutchison to transport to her Majesties plantations in America the persons whose names are Contained in the Lists given in to the Clerks of Councill and as after followes, Viz: John Thom son to James Thom Shoemaker in Glasgow Lauchlan McLean son to Allan McLean in the Isle of Mull, John Stewart son to Angus Stewart in Atholl Thomas Harvie son to James Harvie Maltman in Glasgow all prisoners in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh; Thomas Clerk Son to Thomas Clerk in New Castle and John Nicoll son to John Nicoll in Borrowstouness prisoners in the Correction house of Edinburgh Margaret Wallace Marjory Stewart Mary Gray Elizabeth Gordon Katharine Hagar Janet Ross Janet Robertson Margaret Fisher Bessie Donald Margaret Thomson Geills Baillie Katharin Livingstoun Agnes Kilpatrick Jannet Traill Hellen Allan Agnes Robertsone Sophia Vanheston Janet Toward Janet Gilchrist and Mary Hepburne prisoners in the said Correction house and all common whores and theives and Elizabeth Haliburton present prisoner in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh, and befor extracting heirof appoynts and ordains the said Captain William Hutchisone to give bond and find sufficient Caution acted in the books of privy Councill, that he shall not carry away nor transport any other persons (except these abovementioned whose names are contained in the saids Lists) to her majesties plantations in America and that under the penalty of one hunder pound Sterling in caise he transgress the premisses, and ordaines the magistrats of Edinburgh and Keepers of their prisons to Deliver the fornamed persons to the said Captain Hutchesone to be by him transported as said is upon his receipt to be given for them he alwayes alimenting them in the mean tyme.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 306v-307v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 306v-307v.

Sederunt, 28 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 28th November 17041

D1704/11/102

Sederunt

Marquis of Annandale P.C.; Earl of Craufoord; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Roseberry; Lord Advocat; Lord Rankeilor; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Carnwath; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 28th November 17041

D1704/11/102

Sederunt

Marquis of Annandale P.C.; Earl of Craufoord; Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Roseberry; Lord Advocat; Lord Rankeilor; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Carnwath; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/28, 306v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 306v.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 306v.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 306v.

Act, 16 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 16th November 1704

D1704/11/91

Act

Act in favours of Muirhead of Braidisholme younger

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by James Muire2 of Braidisholme younger Humblie Shewing that by Contract of marriage betwixt James Muirhead of Braidisholme his Father and Mistres Helen Stewart Daughter to the Laird Blantyre his mother, James Muirhead his Grandfather disponed the estate of Braidisholme to his said Father and the airs to be procreat of his Body with the said mistres Helen Stewart his Mother, and He being the Eldest son of the marriage was the person by that Contract designed to Succeed him in that Estates, and his Father accordingly did breed and educat him as his Eldest son and apparent Successor without allowing him the speciall Calling or imployment inclined too wherby to gain his Livelihood, and when he past the schools he allowed him to go abroad in Company with the Laird Blantyre his Uncle upon his saids Fathers Charges and having stayed sometyme in London he returned to his Father wher he was kyndly received and he so fully satisfied with his imploying his tyme ther that he sent him up a second tyme willing him to marry in England which accordingly he did and wherof he signified his great satisfaction by repeated letters to his wife with large promises in his favours and sent up John Muirhead his second son his Brother who has been upon his Cost this even years bygone, He was no sooner married but his wifes friends desyre ane settlement with his Father that he might gett his wifes portion and the fie of the estate established in his person and ane suitable aliment given him in the mean tyme and ane Joynture settled upon his wife in caise of her Survivance all which her Father these six years bygone has waved and neglected, wherby he was necessitat to lift what of his wifes portion was not lyfrented for his present aliment and Subsistance which being exhausted and what remains Lyfrented He and his wife and Child came down to Scotland and were kyndly received by his Father and Mother and entertained in their house with their other Children and the like parentall affection showen towards him as the rest with which he rested satisfied and returned dutifull and filliall obedience yet of late upon some mistake misaprehension or misinformation taken up by or given to his Father he had withdrawen his affection and kyndness debarred him and his family of his house and withheld bread from them and even fire and water wherwith to prepare bread. Befor he offerred this application to their Lordships he imployed all his friends and Relations and even persons of the first quality to mediat for me with his Father that he might yet take what remains of his wifes fortune which is considerable and to settle his Estate in fie to him and to Secure his wife in a suitable Joynture and to give him in the mean tyme a Competent aliment for his family with respect to what the estate can bear and his Father and mother can Spare but nothing of this does prevaile with him. Wherfore from invincible necessity and want of Subsistance He humbly beseeched their Lordships to ordain his Father to putt his Contract of marriage in their Lordships Clerks hands or in the publick Register, and nixt as he has been the instrument of his being in the world and he has bred him up as his Eldest son that he may entertain him accordingly, and since he has Debarred him from his family that their Lordships may modifie to him ane Competent aliment to be payed to him by his Father or allocat to him ane portion of his Estate for that effect as the said petition bears. Which petition being upon the Sixth day of June last bypast read in presence of the saids Lords of privie Councill The Samen was by their Lordships appoynted to be seen and answered by Breadisholme Elder betwixt and nixt Councill day and the said James Muirhead of Braidisholme Elder haveing seen the said petition He gave in the representation following in answer to the said petition Mentioning as followed the said Braidisholme younger has given in a petition to the saids Lords of privie Councill Creaving ane exhibition of his Fathers Contract of marriage in the hands of the Clerks of Councill or to be put in the publict Register pretending therby Interest in the Lands and Estate of Braidisholme, and likewayes that his Father should be decerned to entertaine him and his family or that their Lordships would be pleased to modifie a Competent aliment to be payed by his Father or to allocat a proportion of his estate for that effect and this petition is inforced from a pretended interest in the estate be vertue of his Fathers Contract of Marriage from his Fathers not breeding him to ane Employment which he had chosen from his being in a married state by his Fathers Consent and approbation and any portion he gott with his wife being now Spent except what is lyfrented and that he had mantained his second Brother severall years in England, and therfrom his being removed from his Fathers family and wanting subsistance The petition being ordained to be answered it was a great Surprize to the Father who had educated and bred his son and had bestowed upon him rather above what the Circumstances of His fortune would allow, and who had alwayes born a fatherlie affection to him but seeing Braidisholme younger has taken this method and pretends to wrest from his Father by Law, which the Father will not be found obliedged to therfore in order to ane answer to the said petition the Father Creaves Liberty to represent that by his own Contract of Marriage the Estate is resigned to him and the heirs male of his body which failzieing his other airs maill which failzieing his heirs and assigneyes whatsomever, so that the Father is absolute fiar of the Estate and may dispose therof as he thinks fitt and the petitioner has nothing but a naked jus apparenter et Successionis which affoord no present interest, in the nixt place the Father has not only educat and bred his son as a became a Gantleman but likewayes did breed him to a particular imployment by binding him to a writer to the Signet and was very desirous he Should have continued and prosecute the said imployment but acknowledges he did not go alongs with his sons inclination to be a Souldier, and thinks this will not be interpret ane unreasonable refusall to put him to ane imployment of his own choice as he terms it in his petition, and not only this dar had his Father educat and bred him but has advanced no less then Twelve thousand merks within the Space of five years tyme, wherof Four thousand merks about two years and ane halfe agoe as the price of Cattel Sent to him for driving a trade conforme to the sons letters which he had good reasone to think might be a Sufficietn patrimony for any of his Children even the Eldest considering the Circumstances of his fortune and did likewayes breed his second son to the imployment of a Chururgion and did affoord him a stock of money at London wherupon he might have entered upon a way of Livelihood but if the eldest son did countenance his Brothers idleness at London, it was not the Fathers fault nor did he require him to advance anie thing for him, this being premissed and to Show ther has been no just rise given by the Father to this petition the Defences are as followes, primo the Father cannot be obliedged Summarly to answer a petition without a libelled summonds and Citation, and with all Submission conceives that this being a matter of civill concern it is proper only to be cognosced by the Lords of Session before whom the method of prosecution of aliment is determined by act twentie first Session, Sixt parliament King William which is expressly ordained to be by a lybelled Summonds upon citation and has only the priviledge of not abiding the course of the roll, and especialy this most hold here in this case wher the petitioner pretends ane interest by the Fathers Contract of marriage and craves the Same to be exhibite or registrat which is so purely civill, that a Summonds of such a Nature was never raised before the privie Councill, let be to introduce such a case by way of summar petition Secundo esto, The Lords of Councill Should Sustain this claime before themselves and by way of petition, yet ther can be no ground to modifie an aliment or decern an allocation, first because it is certain the petitioner is Major and forasfamiliat and has been liberally educat, by his Father So that it is presumed he Should be in a Condition and Capacity to Mantaine himselfe and tho ex jure naturer parents are lyable to educate and aliment their Children, yet that is not entended through the whole course of their years, to the encouradgement of Sloath and Laziness; but alleanarly to the younger and tender in years, till they be in a Capacity to act for themselves, nor have ever the Lords of privy Councill been in use to decern in Such aliments nor can instances therof be given, Secundo the Father did breed him to ane imployment, and it was his own fault that he did not prosecute it, Tertio He can document and his Son will not deny that within the Space forsaid he had advanced to him in money and Cattle Twelve thousand merks, and if he has not managed it as he ought to have done that ought not to bring back a burden upon his Fathers family Quarto The petitioner owns he gott a portion with his wife, it was alwayes given out by him and his Father was made believe that it was considerable yea said it was better than his Fathers estate, and the petitioner owns that ther is a pairt of it to the fore but lyferented, which by transaction might procure a subsistance but lastly ther can be no obligation upon the Father to aliment wher he has not sufficient for himselfe and his own family, And notwithstanding of all this kyndness and the Fathers doing for the son above what his Circumstances could allow, yet he has not mett with that Dutifullness which a parent could expect, he refrains from particulars which would be very disagreeable to mention, And lastly the Lords are intreated to consider that a proces of this Nature which is without any parallel and if it meet with the least incouradgment would create Such Disturbances and difficulties that cannot heire easily be numerat, for every son at this rate might pretend to force his Father to settle upon him Seperat aliments altho he had never given him So liberall education, in the modification of which aliment the Fathers Estate and Burdens most be propalled which might tend much to the breaking or impairing of their Credite neither can a Gentleman of a small estate Such as Braidisholme is, allow any aliment to his son He having his Lady and Six or seven younger Children yet in family with him besides other Debts and Burdens, So that allowing him to make but small provisions for his younger Children it’s impossible he can affoord any aliment to his said Son although by Law he were oblidged to do it, which in this case he is not, and this being a generall Concern of all the parents in the Kingdome Its hoped the Lords of privy Councill will reject this bill as utterly irrelevant, as the said representation by way of answer also bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having considered the above petition given in to them by James Muir of Braidisholme younger with the answers therto by James Muirheade of Braidisholme Elder his Father and the samen being read in their presence the saids Lords upon the thirteenth of June last nominated and appoynted the Earles of Eglingtoun and Loudon Lords president of Session Advocat Rankeilor and Phesdo to be a Committie to endeavour to settle and agree pairties and Recommended to the said Committie to meet to morrow at ten of the cloack in the afternoon and Declared any three a quorum Therafter there was further reasons for Braidisholme younger by way of petition in answer to his Fathers Representation given in and presented to the saids Lords Representing that his Father had insinuated to the saids Lords as if he had taken this method directly without applying to him in a Dutifull and filliall way, the whole Country can justifie that not only himselfe but all his friends and Relations, and even the minister of the parochin for these seven moneths bygone had used all the indeavours imaginable to perswade his Father to an amicable agreement and to treat him alse all Fathers does their Eldest sons, and if he thought friends partiall to chose any three men himselfe to whose Determination he was willing to Submitt himselfe, But all refused with protestations and Declarations that he or none of his Should ever have one farthing from him, but what he was compelled to by Law, without giving any reason more than it was hill will and pleasure and he would give it to whom he pleased, or Spend it which he is Doing, He contracting Debt every day, What he had done was not only by Consent but by advice of nearest Relations for preservation of the family, which if called befor their Lord Ships will declare he having made appear to them that notwithstanding his Grandfather left behind him a clear estate of Five thousand merks a year, and his mother who is the sole manager does declare that nothing troubles her more than that for every Dollar She had Spent She had not Spent three, Secundo the reasone why he proceeded not by way of lybell was the unwillingness to expose his parents, for if the barbarous usages of his wife a Stranger in Childbed and at all other tymes and of Infants who were not capable of giving the least offence had been lybelled as received and can be proven would not only have been troublesome to their Lordships but would be a Scandall upon the nation and family for ever, Tertio the Lairds of Minto and Silvertounhill had both of them aliments from their Fathers by Decreits of Councill Quarto He was never bound to a writer to the Signet only had the liberty of Pincaitlands Chambers as he will justifie, Quinto He is now readie to Depone he had not received Cattle and all included above nine thousand merks from his Father neither can be instruct more upon a just Compt and Reckoning and that in ten years tyme he having been abroad ever Since the Ninty five, and for two years before that had not one farthing from his Father out of the said Nine Thousand merks his Brother John has had above four by advice of his Father as he will instruct by letters it was never so much as mentioned in any meeting of friends neither did any of them ever hear of it before, so that it is a great Surprise to all of them, Sexto that both his wife and he have been dutifull and respectfull, and that all those aspersions designedly Spread through the Toune are most false Scandalous and malicious can be proven by Relations Neighbours and Servants of the family, Notwithstanding ther has been indeavours used by threats and otherwayes to corrupt them, and therfore Creaving his Grace and their Lordships to appoynt a Committie impowering them to call for his Fathers Contract of marriage and all other peapers in his Fathers Custody relating therto, and that all persons who may contribute to the clearing of the Same may be cited, and than may it please his Grace and Lordships to determine according to the Justice of the cause, and the manifest necessity of his poor family, as the said petition likeway’s bears, which petition being read upon the thirtie of august last bypast in presence of the saids Lords they Remitted to the former Committie appoynted in the said matter to endeavour to settle and agree the petitioner and his Father and in caise they could not agree appoynted both pairties and their Lawyers to be readie to Debate next Councill day peremptorie therafter Upon the fourth of September last bypast the Lords of her Majesties privy Councill considering that the affair betwixt Braidisholme Elder and younger lay befor a Committy of their own number and Cannot be reported now Lawiers heard therupon now in the tyme of vaccance, and that it being moved by some of the members at the board that the said Braidisholme younger Should have ane Subsistance out of his Fathers estate during the Dependance therfore the saids Lords have Granted and heirby grants to the said James Muirhead younger of Braidisholme the Soume of thirty pounds Sterling money for his Subsistance during the Dependance of the forsaid proces betwixt his Father and him, and appoynts and ordains the said James Muirhead Elder of Braidisholme to pay to James Muirhead younger therof his Son the forsaid Soume of thirty pounds sterling and that during the Dependance of the proces as Said is and that betwixt and the first day of October nixt to Come, and appoynts and ordains letters of horning under the Signet of Councill to be direct heirupon, Ther being a petition given in and presented to the Saids Lords of her Majesties privy Councill by James Muirhead Elder of Braidisholme humblie Shewing that James Muirhead his Eldest Son having Some moneths agoe given in a petition to their Lordships Craving ane aliment for himself and his wife out of his Estate and their Lordships having been pleased to allow him to see and answer the Same, He did accordingly make ane answer therto which did wholly enervate the forsaid petition and the calumnious Representations therin contained, But what was represented in both hands being mostly matter of fact their Lordships were pleased to remitt the said affair to a Committie of their own number who have had Severall meetings on the said affair and have heard my Son and me and by the report of the Committie when their Lordships Shall be pleased to receive the Same, he is very confident the Counsell will be fully convinced of his Sons unjustice and undutifull Carriage toward him, but when that report was moved in Councill their Lordships were pleased to delay the advising and the thirtie of august appoynted both pairties and their Lawiers to be ready to Debate the nixt Councill day which was ordered to the third of october, But their being upon the fourth of September also last a Councell called pro re nota when he was out of toun and his Lawiers no wayes advertised his son took the advantage and upon a false Representation of his mean Condition their Lordships pronunced ane act ordaining him to pay to his said Son Thirtie pound sterling for his Subsistance betwixt and a blank Day which act is not yet given out by the Clerk of privie Councill, he humbly Represented to their Lordships that the act being obtained parte in audita He can give the same no obedience and that because he had made it appear befor the Committie and if he were heard befor their Lordships he is able fully to Demonstrate that he is neither bound by the Law of Nature or Nations to give his Son any pairt of his estate or any manner of aliment in regard he had already received a far greater pairt of his Estate than his Condition will allow considering his numerous family and his just and lawfull Debts all which he Shall lay befor their Lordships, when ever their Lordships shall allow him hearing, and therfore Creaving their Lordships to consider the premisses and to Stop the giving out of the forsaid act or if given out to Sist execution therupon till Such tyme as their Lordships receive and advice the report of the Said Committie and hear both pairties upon the said affair and for that end to appoint Such a Dyet as their Lordships shall think fitt that the said affair may be Determined as the said petition bears which petition being upon the third of october last bypast read in presence of the saids Lords they stopped the giving out of the act in favours of Braidisholme younger allowing him thirtie pound Sterling for his aliment during the Dependance and discharges anie execution to pass therupon untill both pairties be heard in the said matter and Recommends to the Committy formerly appointed in the affair betwixt the Lairds of Braidisholme elder and younger to repair and bring in a report of the forsaid matter to the Councill againest the third Councill day of november next to come and appoynts both pairties procurators to be ready to Debate the cause againest the said day. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill haveing upon the fourteenth of November instant Considered that by their former Deliverance of the Date the third of october last the affair betwixt Braidisholme elder and younger was appoynted to be Debate this Day and Lawiers heard therupon and accordingly both pairties being called and the said […] Muirhead of Braidisholme elder Compeiring personally with Sir Walter Pringle and Master James Hamiltoun his advocats and the said Muirhead of Braidisholme younger Compeiring also personally at the Barr with Sir David Cunighame Sir Archibald Sinclair and Master George Dalrymple his advocats and the petition and answers therto being read and both pairties Lawiers heard at the barr and removed, The Councill nominats and appoynts the Earle of Leven Lord advocat and Phesdo to be a Committie to deall with Braidisholme elder and see if he will give to the said Braidisholme younger any allowance in the mean tyme for his present Subsistance and Recomends to the said Committy to meet to morrow morning at ten of the cloack in the fornoon and declares any two a quorum and to report next Councill day, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having upon the Day and date of thir presents Considered the petition Given in to them by James Muirhead of Braidisholme younger with answers therto by James Muirhead of Braidisholme Elder his Father, togither with Counter petitions and answers therto the saids Lords have remitted and heirby remitts the matter and affair contained in the said petition and answers to the Lords of Councill and Session to be by them summarly discust, and have modified Granted and allowed and heirby Modifies Grants and allowes to the said petitioner James Muirhead of Braidishome younger the Soume of fiftei pound Sterling money in the mean tyme for Caryeing on the said proces and appoynts and ordains the said James Muirhead of Braiddisholme elder to pay the same accordingly, and that at and against the first day of January nixt to come and appoynts letters of horning under the Signet of Councill to be direct heirupon on six dayes allenarly.

Edinburgh the 16th November 1704

D1704/11/91

Act

Act in favours of Muirhead of Braidisholme younger

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by James Muire2 of Braidisholme younger Humblie Shewing that by Contract of marriage betwixt James Muirhead of Braidisholme his Father and Mistres Helen Stewart Daughter to the Laird Blantyre his mother, James Muirhead his Grandfather disponed the estate of Braidisholme to his said Father and the airs to be procreat of his Body with the said mistres Helen Stewart his Mother, and He being the Eldest son of the marriage was the person by that Contract designed to Succeed him in that Estates, and his Father accordingly did breed and educat him as his Eldest son and apparent Successor without allowing him the speciall Calling or imployment inclined too wherby to gain his Livelihood, and when he past the schools he allowed him to go abroad in Company with the Laird Blantyre his Uncle upon his saids Fathers Charges and having stayed sometyme in London he returned to his Father wher he was kyndly received and he so fully satisfied with his imploying his tyme ther that he sent him up a second tyme willing him to marry in England which accordingly he did and wherof he signified his great satisfaction by repeated letters to his wife with large promises in his favours and sent up John Muirhead his second son his Brother who has been upon his Cost this even years bygone, He was no sooner married but his wifes friends desyre ane settlement with his Father that he might gett his wifes portion and the fie of the estate established in his person and ane suitable aliment given him in the mean tyme and ane Joynture settled upon his wife in caise of her Survivance all which her Father these six years bygone has waved and neglected, wherby he was necessitat to lift what of his wifes portion was not lyfrented for his present aliment and Subsistance which being exhausted and what remains Lyfrented He and his wife and Child came down to Scotland and were kyndly received by his Father and Mother and entertained in their house with their other Children and the like parentall affection showen towards him as the rest with which he rested satisfied and returned dutifull and filliall obedience yet of late upon some mistake misaprehension or misinformation taken up by or given to his Father he had withdrawen his affection and kyndness debarred him and his family of his house and withheld bread from them and even fire and water wherwith to prepare bread. Befor he offerred this application to their Lordships he imployed all his friends and Relations and even persons of the first quality to mediat for me with his Father that he might yet take what remains of his wifes fortune which is considerable and to settle his Estate in fie to him and to Secure his wife in a suitable Joynture and to give him in the mean tyme a Competent aliment for his family with respect to what the estate can bear and his Father and mother can Spare but nothing of this does prevaile with him. Wherfore from invincible necessity and want of Subsistance He humbly beseeched their Lordships to ordain his Father to putt his Contract of marriage in their Lordships Clerks hands or in the publick Register, and nixt as he has been the instrument of his being in the world and he has bred him up as his Eldest son that he may entertain him accordingly, and since he has Debarred him from his family that their Lordships may modifie to him ane Competent aliment to be payed to him by his Father or allocat to him ane portion of his Estate for that effect as the said petition bears. Which petition being upon the Sixth day of June last bypast read in presence of the saids Lords of privie Councill The Samen was by their Lordships appoynted to be seen and answered by Breadisholme Elder betwixt and nixt Councill day and the said James Muirhead of Braidisholme Elder haveing seen the said petition He gave in the representation following in answer to the said petition Mentioning as followed the said Braidisholme younger has given in a petition to the saids Lords of privie Councill Creaving ane exhibition of his Fathers Contract of marriage in the hands of the Clerks of Councill or to be put in the publict Register pretending therby Interest in the Lands and Estate of Braidisholme, and likewayes that his Father should be decerned to entertaine him and his family or that their Lordships would be pleased to modifie a Competent aliment to be payed by his Father or to allocat a proportion of his estate for that effect and this petition is inforced from a pretended interest in the estate be vertue of his Fathers Contract of Marriage from his Fathers not breeding him to ane Employment which he had chosen from his being in a married state by his Fathers Consent and approbation and any portion he gott with his wife being now Spent except what is lyfrented and that he had mantained his second Brother severall years in England, and therfrom his being removed from his Fathers family and wanting subsistance The petition being ordained to be answered it was a great Surprize to the Father who had educated and bred his son and had bestowed upon him rather above what the Circumstances of His fortune would allow, and who had alwayes born a fatherlie affection to him but seeing Braidisholme younger has taken this method and pretends to wrest from his Father by Law, which the Father will not be found obliedged to therfore in order to ane answer to the said petition the Father Creaves Liberty to represent that by his own Contract of Marriage the Estate is resigned to him and the heirs male of his body which failzieing his other airs maill which failzieing his heirs and assigneyes whatsomever, so that the Father is absolute fiar of the Estate and may dispose therof as he thinks fitt and the petitioner has nothing but a naked jus apparenter et Successionis which affoord no present interest, in the nixt place the Father has not only educat and bred his son as a became a Gantleman but likewayes did breed him to a particular imployment by binding him to a writer to the Signet and was very desirous he Should have continued and prosecute the said imployment but acknowledges he did not go alongs with his sons inclination to be a Souldier, and thinks this will not be interpret ane unreasonable refusall to put him to ane imployment of his own choice as he terms it in his petition, and not only this dar had his Father educat and bred him but has advanced no less then Twelve thousand merks within the Space of five years tyme, wherof Four thousand merks about two years and ane halfe agoe as the price of Cattel Sent to him for driving a trade conforme to the sons letters which he had good reasone to think might be a Sufficietn patrimony for any of his Children even the Eldest considering the Circumstances of his fortune and did likewayes breed his second son to the imployment of a Chururgion and did affoord him a stock of money at London wherupon he might have entered upon a way of Livelihood but if the eldest son did countenance his Brothers idleness at London, it was not the Fathers fault nor did he require him to advance anie thing for him, this being premissed and to Show ther has been no just rise given by the Father to this petition the Defences are as followes, primo the Father cannot be obliedged Summarly to answer a petition without a libelled summonds and Citation, and with all Submission conceives that this being a matter of civill concern it is proper only to be cognosced by the Lords of Session before whom the method of prosecution of aliment is determined by act twentie first Session, Sixt parliament King William which is expressly ordained to be by a lybelled Summonds upon citation and has only the priviledge of not abiding the course of the roll, and especialy this most hold here in this case wher the petitioner pretends ane interest by the Fathers Contract of marriage and craves the Same to be exhibite or registrat which is so purely civill, that a Summonds of such a Nature was never raised before the privie Councill, let be to introduce such a case by way of summar petition Secundo esto, The Lords of Councill Should Sustain this claime before themselves and by way of petition, yet ther can be no ground to modifie an aliment or decern an allocation, first because it is certain the petitioner is Major and forasfamiliat and has been liberally educat, by his Father So that it is presumed he Should be in a Condition and Capacity to Mantaine himselfe and tho ex jure naturer parents are lyable to educate and aliment their Children, yet that is not entended through the whole course of their years, to the encouradgement of Sloath and Laziness; but alleanarly to the younger and tender in years, till they be in a Capacity to act for themselves, nor have ever the Lords of privy Councill been in use to decern in Such aliments nor can instances therof be given, Secundo the Father did breed him to ane imployment, and it was his own fault that he did not prosecute it, Tertio He can document and his Son will not deny that within the Space forsaid he had advanced to him in money and Cattle Twelve thousand merks, and if he has not managed it as he ought to have done that ought not to bring back a burden upon his Fathers family Quarto The petitioner owns he gott a portion with his wife, it was alwayes given out by him and his Father was made believe that it was considerable yea said it was better than his Fathers estate, and the petitioner owns that ther is a pairt of it to the fore but lyferented, which by transaction might procure a subsistance but lastly ther can be no obligation upon the Father to aliment wher he has not sufficient for himselfe and his own family, And notwithstanding of all this kyndness and the Fathers doing for the son above what his Circumstances could allow, yet he has not mett with that Dutifullness which a parent could expect, he refrains from particulars which would be very disagreeable to mention, And lastly the Lords are intreated to consider that a proces of this Nature which is without any parallel and if it meet with the least incouradgment would create Such Disturbances and difficulties that cannot heire easily be numerat, for every son at this rate might pretend to force his Father to settle upon him Seperat aliments altho he had never given him So liberall education, in the modification of which aliment the Fathers Estate and Burdens most be propalled which might tend much to the breaking or impairing of their Credite neither can a Gentleman of a small estate Such as Braidisholme is, allow any aliment to his son He having his Lady and Six or seven younger Children yet in family with him besides other Debts and Burdens, So that allowing him to make but small provisions for his younger Children it’s impossible he can affoord any aliment to his said Son although by Law he were oblidged to do it, which in this case he is not, and this being a generall Concern of all the parents in the Kingdome Its hoped the Lords of privy Councill will reject this bill as utterly irrelevant, as the said representation by way of answer also bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having considered the above petition given in to them by James Muir of Braidisholme younger with the answers therto by James Muirheade of Braidisholme Elder his Father and the samen being read in their presence the saids Lords upon the thirteenth of June last nominated and appoynted the Earles of Eglingtoun and Loudon Lords president of Session Advocat Rankeilor and Phesdo to be a Committie to endeavour to settle and agree pairties and Recommended to the said Committie to meet to morrow at ten of the cloack in the afternoon and Declared any three a quorum Therafter there was further reasons for Braidisholme younger by way of petition in answer to his Fathers Representation given in and presented to the saids Lords Representing that his Father had insinuated to the saids Lords as if he had taken this method directly without applying to him in a Dutifull and filliall way, the whole Country can justifie that not only himselfe but all his friends and Relations, and even the minister of the parochin for these seven moneths bygone had used all the indeavours imaginable to perswade his Father to an amicable agreement and to treat him alse all Fathers does their Eldest sons, and if he thought friends partiall to chose any three men himselfe to whose Determination he was willing to Submitt himselfe, But all refused with protestations and Declarations that he or none of his Should ever have one farthing from him, but what he was compelled to by Law, without giving any reason more than it was hill will and pleasure and he would give it to whom he pleased, or Spend it which he is Doing, He contracting Debt every day, What he had done was not only by Consent but by advice of nearest Relations for preservation of the family, which if called befor their Lord Ships will declare he having made appear to them that notwithstanding his Grandfather left behind him a clear estate of Five thousand merks a year, and his mother who is the sole manager does declare that nothing troubles her more than that for every Dollar She had Spent She had not Spent three, Secundo the reasone why he proceeded not by way of lybell was the unwillingness to expose his parents, for if the barbarous usages of his wife a Stranger in Childbed and at all other tymes and of Infants who were not capable of giving the least offence had been lybelled as received and can be proven would not only have been troublesome to their Lordships but would be a Scandall upon the nation and family for ever, Tertio the Lairds of Minto and Silvertounhill had both of them aliments from their Fathers by Decreits of Councill Quarto He was never bound to a writer to the Signet only had the liberty of Pincaitlands Chambers as he will justifie, Quinto He is now readie to Depone he had not received Cattle and all included above nine thousand merks from his Father neither can be instruct more upon a just Compt and Reckoning and that in ten years tyme he having been abroad ever Since the Ninty five, and for two years before that had not one farthing from his Father out of the said Nine Thousand merks his Brother John has had above four by advice of his Father as he will instruct by letters it was never so much as mentioned in any meeting of friends neither did any of them ever hear of it before, so that it is a great Surprise to all of them, Sexto that both his wife and he have been dutifull and respectfull, and that all those aspersions designedly Spread through the Toune are most false Scandalous and malicious can be proven by Relations Neighbours and Servants of the family, Notwithstanding ther has been indeavours used by threats and otherwayes to corrupt them, and therfore Creaving his Grace and their Lordships to appoynt a Committie impowering them to call for his Fathers Contract of marriage and all other peapers in his Fathers Custody relating therto, and that all persons who may contribute to the clearing of the Same may be cited, and than may it please his Grace and Lordships to determine according to the Justice of the cause, and the manifest necessity of his poor family, as the said petition likeway’s bears, which petition being read upon the thirtie of august last bypast in presence of the saids Lords they Remitted to the former Committie appoynted in the said matter to endeavour to settle and agree the petitioner and his Father and in caise they could not agree appoynted both pairties and their Lawyers to be readie to Debate next Councill day peremptorie therafter Upon the fourth of September last bypast the Lords of her Majesties privy Councill considering that the affair betwixt Braidisholme Elder and younger lay befor a Committy of their own number and Cannot be reported now Lawiers heard therupon now in the tyme of vaccance, and that it being moved by some of the members at the board that the said Braidisholme younger Should have ane Subsistance out of his Fathers estate during the Dependance therfore the saids Lords have Granted and heirby grants to the said James Muirhead younger of Braidisholme the Soume of thirty pounds Sterling money for his Subsistance during the Dependance of the forsaid proces betwixt his Father and him, and appoynts and ordains the said James Muirhead Elder of Braidisholme to pay to James Muirhead younger therof his Son the forsaid Soume of thirty pounds sterling and that during the Dependance of the proces as Said is and that betwixt and the first day of October nixt to Come, and appoynts and ordains letters of horning under the Signet of Councill to be direct heirupon, Ther being a petition given in and presented to the Saids Lords of her Majesties privy Councill by James Muirhead Elder of Braidisholme humblie Shewing that James Muirhead his Eldest Son having Some moneths agoe given in a petition to their Lordships Craving ane aliment for himself and his wife out of his Estate and their Lordships having been pleased to allow him to see and answer the Same, He did accordingly make ane answer therto which did wholly enervate the forsaid petition and the calumnious Representations therin contained, But what was represented in both hands being mostly matter of fact their Lordships were pleased to remitt the said affair to a Committie of their own number who have had Severall meetings on the said affair and have heard my Son and me and by the report of the Committie when their Lordships Shall be pleased to receive the Same, he is very confident the Counsell will be fully convinced of his Sons unjustice and undutifull Carriage toward him, but when that report was moved in Councill their Lordships were pleased to delay the advising and the thirtie of august appoynted both pairties and their Lawiers to be ready to Debate the nixt Councill day which was ordered to the third of october, But their being upon the fourth of September also last a Councell called pro re nota when he was out of toun and his Lawiers no wayes advertised his son took the advantage and upon a false Representation of his mean Condition their Lordships pronunced ane act ordaining him to pay to his said Son Thirtie pound sterling for his Subsistance betwixt and a blank Day which act is not yet given out by the Clerk of privie Councill, he humbly Represented to their Lordships that the act being obtained parte in audita He can give the same no obedience and that because he had made it appear befor the Committie and if he were heard befor their Lordships he is able fully to Demonstrate that he is neither bound by the Law of Nature or Nations to give his Son any pairt of his estate or any manner of aliment in regard he had already received a far greater pairt of his Estate than his Condition will allow considering his numerous family and his just and lawfull Debts all which he Shall lay befor their Lordships, when ever their Lordships shall allow him hearing, and therfore Creaving their Lordships to consider the premisses and to Stop the giving out of the forsaid act or if given out to Sist execution therupon till Such tyme as their Lordships receive and advice the report of the Said Committie and hear both pairties upon the said affair and for that end to appoint Such a Dyet as their Lordships shall think fitt that the said affair may be Determined as the said petition bears which petition being upon the third of october last bypast read in presence of the saids Lords they stopped the giving out of the act in favours of Braidisholme younger allowing him thirtie pound Sterling for his aliment during the Dependance and discharges anie execution to pass therupon untill both pairties be heard in the said matter and Recommends to the Committy formerly appointed in the affair betwixt the Lairds of Braidisholme elder and younger to repair and bring in a report of the forsaid matter to the Councill againest the third Councill day of november next to come and appoynts both pairties procurators to be ready to Debate the cause againest the said day. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill haveing upon the fourteenth of November instant Considered that by their former Deliverance of the Date the third of october last the affair betwixt Braidisholme elder and younger was appoynted to be Debate this Day and Lawiers heard therupon and accordingly both pairties being called and the said […] Muirhead of Braidisholme elder Compeiring personally with Sir Walter Pringle and Master James Hamiltoun his advocats and the said Muirhead of Braidisholme younger Compeiring also personally at the Barr with Sir David Cunighame Sir Archibald Sinclair and Master George Dalrymple his advocats and the petition and answers therto being read and both pairties Lawiers heard at the barr and removed, The Councill nominats and appoynts the Earle of Leven Lord advocat and Phesdo to be a Committie to deall with Braidisholme elder and see if he will give to the said Braidisholme younger any allowance in the mean tyme for his present Subsistance and Recomends to the said Committy to meet to morrow morning at ten of the cloack in the fornoon and declares any two a quorum and to report next Councill day, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having upon the Day and date of thir presents Considered the petition Given in to them by James Muirhead of Braidisholme younger with answers therto by James Muirhead of Braidisholme Elder his Father, togither with Counter petitions and answers therto the saids Lords have remitted and heirby remitts the matter and affair contained in the said petition and answers to the Lords of Councill and Session to be by them summarly discust, and have modified Granted and allowed and heirby Modifies Grants and allowes to the said petitioner James Muirhead of Braidishome younger the Soume of fiftei pound Sterling money in the mean tyme for Caryeing on the said proces and appoynts and ordains the said James Muirhead of Braiddisholme elder to pay the same accordingly, and that at and against the first day of January nixt to come and appoynts letters of horning under the Signet of Councill to be direct heirupon on six dayes allenarly.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 301r-306v.

2. Sic.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 301r-306v.

2. Sic.

Sederunt, 16 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 16th November 17041

D1704/11/82

Sederunt

Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Mortoune; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Loudon; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Viscount Primrose; Lord Advocat; Lord Halcraig; Lord Enstruther; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Caverse; Laird of Prestongrange; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 16th November 17041

D1704/11/82

Sederunt

Marquis of Annandale P:C:; Earl of Mortoune; Earl of Buchan; Earl of Lauderdale; Earl of Loudon; Earl of Leven; Earl of Northesk; Earl of Forfar; Viscount Primrose; Lord Advocat; Lord Halcraig; Lord Enstruther; Lord Phesdo; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Caverse; Laird of Prestongrange; Lord Provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/28, 301r.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 301r.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 301r.

2. NRS, PC2/28, 301r.

Act, 7 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 7th November 1704

D1704/11/71

Act

Act in favours of Barbara Cockburn Spouse to Saint Mairtins for citeing her Husband

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by Barbara Cockburn spouse to the Laird of St Martines Shewing that wher she was married to James Dallas of St Martines upon the […] day of […] who very shortly after their marriage began to treat her with extream rigour and unkindness, which nevertheless she supported with all Dutifull Submission and patience, and would had continowed to the last moment of her life to doe soe if her said husband his Inclemency and hard usadge had not brock out so openly and in ane instance which did visibly threaten her life and in such ane manner as excluded all hopes of living in any peace or safty with him heirafter She did therfore now humbly represent her Distrest Condition in the following Circumstances, and primo albeit her husband was so cautious as to avoid these things openly which might affoord a legall ground of Seperation yet she was not able to express the bitterness she mett with in secret and which she can no otherwayes prove than by adducing the servants in the house and these in the neighbourhood to witnes the mournings which had been heard in the roume wher she was shut up with her husband, and that she had been heard to walk bare footed diverse nights in that mourning Condition, Secundo after a tract of Severties and when she came to be delyvered of her Child she offered to prove by the neighbourhood and servants in her familie that she continowed to Cry out in Labour from ten at night to seven the nixt Morning without having any help or assistance called, and then when a Midwife was sent for who was accidentally out of the way and could not attend herselfe, she sent ane other Skilled woman to assist her, yet that woman was not suffered to give her any help, and unless it had been from the help she received in her uttermost Extremitie from ane other her Mother sent for she most had then perished with her Child, Tertio when he husband was quarrelled for so great Crueltie He made frivolous and unsatisfactorie pretences implieing that the treatment had been studied, and to compleat all, wished that he had power to bring fire from Heaven to consume her and her friends, Quarto after so dangerous and hard usadge She was depryved of the pleasure of seeing her infant, which was carryed out of the house some dayes after it was born without so much as ever letting her see it or telling her whither it was Convoyed, Quinto by these hard useadges she was brought to the Danger of her life, which She offered to prove, ther are many other important Circumstances which no doubt will concurr to satisfie their Lordships of the necessity of seperation and which she is ready also to prove, but these she only mentioned in generall out of the Decent respect which she had to her Husband and most humbly beseech their Lordships to believe that nothing could have made her expose her misfortune and affliction in a Complaint of this nature but a settled beliefe deryved from the sad experience she had of her Husbands utter aversion to her, and that if any opposition be made by her in a Seperation it is not out of affection and will inevitably end in her Ruine, and therfore Creaving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition Given in to them by Barbara Cockburn spouse to St Mertines, and the samen being read in their presence the saids Lords Doe heirby grant Warrand to Macers of privie Councill or Messengers at arms to Cite the said James Dallas of St Martines the petitioners husband to Compeir before the saids Lords upon the fourteenth day of November instant to hear and see the Circumstances particularly and generally Contained in the above petition proven and for that effect Grants warrand to the saids Macers or Messingers to Cite such witness as the petitioner shall Condescend one for proving the matter Contained in the forsaid above petition to appear before the saids Lords day and place forsaid, and bear leill and Suithfast witnessing in suae far as they know or shall be speared at them in the forsaid matter.

Edinburgh the 7th November 1704

D1704/11/71

Act

Act in favours of Barbara Cockburn Spouse to Saint Mairtins for citeing her Husband

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by Barbara Cockburn spouse to the Laird of St Martines Shewing that wher she was married to James Dallas of St Martines upon the […] day of […] who very shortly after their marriage began to treat her with extream rigour and unkindness, which nevertheless she supported with all Dutifull Submission and patience, and would had continowed to the last moment of her life to doe soe if her said husband his Inclemency and hard usadge had not brock out so openly and in ane instance which did visibly threaten her life and in such ane manner as excluded all hopes of living in any peace or safty with him heirafter She did therfore now humbly represent her Distrest Condition in the following Circumstances, and primo albeit her husband was so cautious as to avoid these things openly which might affoord a legall ground of Seperation yet she was not able to express the bitterness she mett with in secret and which she can no otherwayes prove than by adducing the servants in the house and these in the neighbourhood to witnes the mournings which had been heard in the roume wher she was shut up with her husband, and that she had been heard to walk bare footed diverse nights in that mourning Condition, Secundo after a tract of Severties and when she came to be delyvered of her Child she offered to prove by the neighbourhood and servants in her familie that she continowed to Cry out in Labour from ten at night to seven the nixt Morning without having any help or assistance called, and then when a Midwife was sent for who was accidentally out of the way and could not attend herselfe, she sent ane other Skilled woman to assist her, yet that woman was not suffered to give her any help, and unless it had been from the help she received in her uttermost Extremitie from ane other her Mother sent for she most had then perished with her Child, Tertio when he husband was quarrelled for so great Crueltie He made frivolous and unsatisfactorie pretences implieing that the treatment had been studied, and to compleat all, wished that he had power to bring fire from Heaven to consume her and her friends, Quarto after so dangerous and hard usadge She was depryved of the pleasure of seeing her infant, which was carryed out of the house some dayes after it was born without so much as ever letting her see it or telling her whither it was Convoyed, Quinto by these hard useadges she was brought to the Danger of her life, which She offered to prove, ther are many other important Circumstances which no doubt will concurr to satisfie their Lordships of the necessity of seperation and which she is ready also to prove, but these she only mentioned in generall out of the Decent respect which she had to her Husband and most humbly beseech their Lordships to believe that nothing could have made her expose her misfortune and affliction in a Complaint of this nature but a settled beliefe deryved from the sad experience she had of her Husbands utter aversion to her, and that if any opposition be made by her in a Seperation it is not out of affection and will inevitably end in her Ruine, and therfore Creaving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition Given in to them by Barbara Cockburn spouse to St Mertines, and the samen being read in their presence the saids Lords Doe heirby grant Warrand to Macers of privie Councill or Messengers at arms to Cite the said James Dallas of St Martines the petitioners husband to Compeir before the saids Lords upon the fourteenth day of November instant to hear and see the Circumstances particularly and generally Contained in the above petition proven and for that effect Grants warrand to the saids Macers or Messingers to Cite such witness as the petitioner shall Condescend one for proving the matter Contained in the forsaid above petition to appear before the saids Lords day and place forsaid, and bear leill and Suithfast witnessing in suae far as they know or shall be speared at them in the forsaid matter.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 300r-301r.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 300r-301r.

Act, 7 November 1704, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the 7th November 1704

D1704/11/61

Act

Act in favours of Patton of Panholls for Citeing of the Earle of Perth and others

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by William Patton of Panholls and his Tennants Shewing that wheras the theivs and brocken men in the Highlands having in December Jaj vic and eighty nyne years fallen doun upon his Lands and robbed and Spulizied from them all their goods to the value of six thousand pound and laid waste ane great pairt therof and they having raised ane pursute before their Lordships in January Jaj vic and nyntie years against the Earle of Perth and others foundit upon the acts of parliament and proclamation’s of the Councill against heirships and Depredations committed in the Highlands, and the Lybell being admitted to their probation and witnesses examined and the probation ready to be advysed, and seeing the said proces is now Sleeping and therfore Creaving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition given in to them by William Patton of Panholls, and the samen being read in their presence the saids Lords doe heirby grant Warrand to the petitioner to maek Intimation by by ane nottar and witnesses as effeirs to the Earle of Perth and others his Factors and Chamberland such of them as are within this Kingdome personally or at their dwelling places upon fifteen dayes and such as are furth therof at the Mercat Cross of Edinburgh peir and Shoar of Leith Upon Sixtie dayes to Compear before the saids Lords upon the eleventh day of January next to Come to hear and see the probation led at the petitioners instance against them advised to the finall End and Decision therof.

Edinburgh the 7th November 1704

D1704/11/61

Act

Act in favours of Patton of Panholls for Citeing of the Earle of Perth and others

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councill by William Patton of Panholls and his Tennants Shewing that wheras the theivs and brocken men in the Highlands having in December Jaj vic and eighty nyne years fallen doun upon his Lands and robbed and Spulizied from them all their goods to the value of six thousand pound and laid waste ane great pairt therof and they having raised ane pursute before their Lordships in January Jaj vic and nyntie years against the Earle of Perth and others foundit upon the acts of parliament and proclamation’s of the Councill against heirships and Depredations committed in the Highlands, and the Lybell being admitted to their probation and witnesses examined and the probation ready to be advysed, and seeing the said proces is now Sleeping and therfore Creaving to the effect aftermentioned as the said petition bears. The Lords of her Majesties privie Councill having Considered the above petition given in to them by William Patton of Panholls, and the samen being read in their presence the saids Lords doe heirby grant Warrand to the petitioner to maek Intimation by by ane nottar and witnesses as effeirs to the Earle of Perth and others his Factors and Chamberland such of them as are within this Kingdome personally or at their dwelling places upon fifteen dayes and such as are furth therof at the Mercat Cross of Edinburgh peir and Shoar of Leith Upon Sixtie dayes to Compear before the saids Lords upon the eleventh day of January next to Come to hear and see the probation led at the petitioners instance against them advised to the finall End and Decision therof.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 299v-300r.

1. NRS, PC2/28, 299v-300r.