Act, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/7/151

Act

Act Margrat Rasper Against The Viscount of Kenmure

Anent a Petition given in to Lords of their majesties privy Councill be poor Margrat Rasper Shewing That the petitioner being a poor widdow was ejected most violently out of her possession by the Viscount of Kenmuir his Chamberland and their accomplices of quich the petitioner Complained to their Lordships Bot the Viscount Disregairding any thing the petitioner could doe Compeired not, Bot sufered himself to be denunced, And when in march last he gave in a bill of suspensione and relaxatione, And the said petitioner Compeired to answer, The saids Lords ordained him to pay to the petitioner two hundred merks of aliment And Declared that upon the payment he was to be relaxed from the horne of Consent, Bot tho the petitioners has Caused charge him with horning and Denunced him for not payment of the said aliment yet the said Viscount Contempteously refuses, And albeit the saids Lords by their feist deliverance ordained the said petitioner to insist in her principall Lybell againe the first of June, yet such is the said viscounts opression that the not only dispises to relax himself and Compeir Bot by threatning and otherwayes keeps back the said Petitioners witnesses that she Cannot gett them in it being beyond her power to take out and executed Caption against them In Respect of the said petitioners extream poverty and distress Which is in effect all the Viscounts confidence And seing that the saids Lords may by these things clearly see the petitioners sad afflictione and oppression And that after now haing waited almost a year and ane half for the saids Lords Justice The petitioners adversary doeth openly contemne all she can doe or that their Lordships hath inability and poverty she is not able longer to subsist muchless to prosecute her Complaint against him before the saids Lords wher she mett with such hinderance And Therfore Humbly Craving their Lordships In Respect of the Viscounts manifast contempt and being denunced of the horse now for ane second tyme To ordaine the said petitioner to be sumarly repossessed in the roome and lands whence she was ejected and Deliver back her goods and geir taken from her most wrongeously or the value therof And allow the said petitioner for her damnadge which is great by and attour his wounding blooding of the said petitioner and Cheldrein And to give warrand to the shireff or any two of the Justice of peace to repossess her brevi manu without farder delay as the said petitione bears. The Lords of Their majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this Petition given in to them be the above Margrat Rasper They Recommend to their Majesties Soliciter to pass and exped a gift of the Viscount of Kenmures Escheat for their majesties behoove upon the horning raised at the petitioners instance against him for payment of the said two hundred merks of expences And in the mean tyme Recommends to the Lords Commissioners of their Majesties thesaurie to cause payment be made of the said soume of Two Hundreth Merks to the petitioner in place of the two hundreth merks of expences appoynted by the Councill to have been payed to the viscount to her.

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/7/151

Act

Act Margrat Rasper Against The Viscount of Kenmure

Anent a Petition given in to Lords of their majesties privy Councill be poor Margrat Rasper Shewing That the petitioner being a poor widdow was ejected most violently out of her possession by the Viscount of Kenmuir his Chamberland and their accomplices of quich the petitioner Complained to their Lordships Bot the Viscount Disregairding any thing the petitioner could doe Compeired not, Bot sufered himself to be denunced, And when in march last he gave in a bill of suspensione and relaxatione, And the said petitioner Compeired to answer, The saids Lords ordained him to pay to the petitioner two hundred merks of aliment And Declared that upon the payment he was to be relaxed from the horne of Consent, Bot tho the petitioners has Caused charge him with horning and Denunced him for not payment of the said aliment yet the said Viscount Contempteously refuses, And albeit the saids Lords by their feist deliverance ordained the said petitioner to insist in her principall Lybell againe the first of June, yet such is the said viscounts opression that the not only dispises to relax himself and Compeir Bot by threatning and otherwayes keeps back the said Petitioners witnesses that she Cannot gett them in it being beyond her power to take out and executed Caption against them In Respect of the said petitioners extream poverty and distress Which is in effect all the Viscounts confidence And seing that the saids Lords may by these things clearly see the petitioners sad afflictione and oppression And that after now haing waited almost a year and ane half for the saids Lords Justice The petitioners adversary doeth openly contemne all she can doe or that their Lordships hath inability and poverty she is not able longer to subsist muchless to prosecute her Complaint against him before the saids Lords wher she mett with such hinderance And Therfore Humbly Craving their Lordships In Respect of the Viscounts manifast contempt and being denunced of the horse now for ane second tyme To ordaine the said petitioner to be sumarly repossessed in the roome and lands whence she was ejected and Deliver back her goods and geir taken from her most wrongeously or the value therof And allow the said petitioner for her damnadge which is great by and attour his wounding blooding of the said petitioner and Cheldrein And to give warrand to the shireff or any two of the Justice of peace to repossess her brevi manu without farder delay as the said petitione bears. The Lords of Their majesties privy Councill haveing Considered this Petition given in to them be the above Margrat Rasper They Recommend to their Majesties Soliciter to pass and exped a gift of the Viscount of Kenmures Escheat for their majesties behoove upon the horning raised at the petitioners instance against him for payment of the said two hundred merks of expences And in the mean tyme Recommends to the Lords Commissioners of their Majesties thesaurie to cause payment be made of the said soume of Two Hundreth Merks to the petitioner in place of the two hundreth merks of expences appoynted by the Councill to have been payed to the viscount to her.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 77r-77v.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 77r-77v.

Act, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/7/141

Act

Act Mr James Gray of Balnagoun and Commissioners of supply of Aberdeenshyre

The Lords of their Majesties privy Councill haveing heard a Petition given in to them be the Commissioners of Supply of the Shyre of Aberdeen and Mr James Gray of Balnagown Craveing the saids Lords to grant warrand for removeing any part of the souldiers quartered upon the lands of Balnagowan and Cairnfield for deficiency in payment of the Cess or other publict dues as a part of the shyre of Banff without payment of any quartering money, and to prohibit and Discharge any such sumar quartering upon the saids lands or any others within the shyre of Aberdeen Otherwayes then in the proportiones prescryved by law In caise these lands or the heritors therof be deficient In payment of their proportiones as parts of the said shyre of Aberdeen As also to Decerne James Cock the Collector of the Shyre of Banff to repay the petitioners expences according to the modificatione In Respect of his unwarrantable order for the quartering quhich was produced to the petitioner quhen he took instruments against the said Illegall quartering The saids Lords allow the above Collector of Supply of the Shyre of Bannff to see and answer the said petition, And in the mean tyme ordains the parties quartered upon the above Lands of Cairnfeild and Balgonie to be removed (without payment of quartering or ryding money) furth with upon intimatione heirof And Discharges the quartering of any such parties in tyme comeing Untill answers be given in to this petition and advysed be the saids Lords and interloquitor given be them upon the said petitione and the saids answers.

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/7/141

Act

Act Mr James Gray of Balnagoun and Commissioners of supply of Aberdeenshyre

The Lords of their Majesties privy Councill haveing heard a Petition given in to them be the Commissioners of Supply of the Shyre of Aberdeen and Mr James Gray of Balnagown Craveing the saids Lords to grant warrand for removeing any part of the souldiers quartered upon the lands of Balnagowan and Cairnfield for deficiency in payment of the Cess or other publict dues as a part of the shyre of Banff without payment of any quartering money, and to prohibit and Discharge any such sumar quartering upon the saids lands or any others within the shyre of Aberdeen Otherwayes then in the proportiones prescryved by law In caise these lands or the heritors therof be deficient In payment of their proportiones as parts of the said shyre of Aberdeen As also to Decerne James Cock the Collector of the Shyre of Banff to repay the petitioners expences according to the modificatione In Respect of his unwarrantable order for the quartering quhich was produced to the petitioner quhen he took instruments against the said Illegall quartering The saids Lords allow the above Collector of Supply of the Shyre of Bannff to see and answer the said petition, And in the mean tyme ordains the parties quartered upon the above Lands of Cairnfeild and Balgonie to be removed (without payment of quartering or ryding money) furth with upon intimatione heirof And Discharges the quartering of any such parties in tyme comeing Untill answers be given in to this petition and advysed be the saids Lords and interloquitor given be them upon the said petitione and the saids answers.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 76v-77r.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 76v-77r.

Act, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/7/131

Act

Act and Remit The Lady Kinfaunes and her Sone and the Laird of Kinfauns and his tutor

Anent the two severall petitiones given and presented to the Lords of their majesties privy Councill The one therof at the instance of John Carnegie sone of the second mariadge of the deceast Alexander Carneige of Kinfauns Margrat Nairne relict of the said Alexander Carnegie for her self and as tutor to her said sone and his remanent tutors Shewing That quher the petitioners haveing formerly applyed to the saids Lords representing the intrest they hade to see the defuncts papers Inventared The saids Lords Did allow the tutors of the Childrein of both mariadges to be present at the inventaring of the defuncts writtes, And appoynted the tutors of the Childrein of aither Mariadges to make intimation hinc inde of the tyme of Inventaring and accordingly the petitioner did intimat the saids Lords act, Bot In respect the former act did not Clearly authorize the petitioner to inspect or Inventar by themselves, And that Phinhaven the tutor dative of the sone of the first mariadge hath both lately exped his tutory The petitioners doe againe beg libertie to lay before the saids Lords the grounds upon which they clame ane intrest to see, And In Respect the defuncts writtes and also his haill moveables, And farder intreat that the saids Lords would render the ordinance effectuall and authorize the petitioner at the sight of any Judge ordinary to have Inspection, If Phinhaven Should ommitt to make Inventars according to law for the reasones following viz Primo The petitioner the sone of the second mariadge is a Creditor in five hundred pund sterling his mothers contract, And the petitioner the relict is Creditor by the same Contract in ane lifrent annuitie of two Thousand five Hundred merks, And they hade reason to beleive that the defunct hade done some speciall deed in their favors, And allocat ane certaine fond for Implement of the forsaid provisiones, Secundo the sone of the second mariadge has the right of successione faillieing the only sone of the first And as the law for the securitie of the intrest of minors hade appointed Inventars to be Judicially made to the effect that the Condition of the estate might be publictly knowen to every persone interessted, Much more hath the nixt air ane speciall intrest to see that these Inventars be fairly made, The Raither because the Estate of Kinfauns came by the defuncts first Lady, hath some specialities as to the succession therin faillieng airs male of that marriadge which the petitioner Ought to see and know Tertio the petitioner the relict is executrix Creditrix etc firmed and hath confirmed the annualrents of the severall heretaball bonds lying by the defunct, and therby is concerned to see these bonds, Quarto the greatest part of the defuncts estate doeth consist in bonds and rights upon the Earle of Northesks estate, and Phinhaven being the nixt and Immediat air to this present Earle of Northesk, If the Earle should happen to decease without airs Phinhaven the tutor would succeid and become debitor and tutor to the Creditor, And Therfore It was more reasonable that a very speciall and particular Inventar should be made of these writtes, both for securitie of the pupill if he live and of the airs of the second marriadge In caice of his decease Quinto seing the law does appoint tutors to make Inventars of the defuncts wholl means It was necessary that the saids Lords should Limitt a particular tyme betwixt and which these inventars should be made to the petitioners of all dyets of inspectione of the writtes or other moveables that they might be present with Certification to Phinhaven if he faillied that the saids Lords would authorize the petitioners to have inspection of the saids writtes, and that he might Inventar the moveables at any tyme after the said dyet at the sight of any Judge ordinary, With power to the said Judge ordinary to make patent the doors of the house Erroll and of the severall Coffers, Trunks, Cabinetts or others, wher the papers or other moveables Lye And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords to prefixx a certaine dyet to Phinhaven the tutor of the first mariadge for making inventars of the defuncts writtes and estate heretaball or moveable And appoint Phinhaven to make intimatione to the petitioners of the severall dyets that he is to have inspectione in order to inventaring, And Discharge his inspectione untill he should make the forsaid intimatione to them, As also to Discharge his midleing and intromission as tutor, untill the forsaid inventars be made Conforme to the act of Parliament, And in caice of the tutors faillieing to Inspect and Compleit the forsaid Inventars betwixt and the forsaid dyet, That the Lords would authorize the petitioners to have inspection of the forsaid writtes, And to have such of the said writtes as are conceaved in their favors delivered up to them upon Inventar and recept And also that they might have access to inventar the moveaballs in order to confirmatione, And Lykewayes that the petitioner the relicts body Cloathes and parapharnalia that should be found amongst the defuncts moveables might be Delivered up to her upon recept, And that at the sight of any of the saids Lords number or any of the Lords of session or other Judge ordinary, with power to the saids Judges to make open doors of the house of Erroll and other places, And of the severall trunks Coffers, &c: wher the defuncts wrytes and moveables Lye as the said petitione bears And the other of the saids petitiones by way of answer to the forsaid petitione at the instance of Alexander Blair of Kinfauns and James Carnegie of Phinhaven his tutor Shewing That quheras Margaret Nairn relict of the deceast Alexander Carnegie of Kinfauns and John Carnegie his Sone and his tutors haveing given in a Petition to the saids Lords Representing that the relict being Creditor to her husband for the soume of Two thousand five hundred merks of Joyntur and her sone for five hundred punds sterling for his provision, haveing formerly Applyed to the saids Lords, That they might have access to have inspectione of the Laird of Kinfauns his writtes at the makeing of the inventars by the tutor of the petitioner the sone and air of the first mariage and might have such papers delivered to them as should be found to belong to them And that the saids Lords therupon hade allowed the sone of the second marriage to be present at the inventaring of the defuncts papers and appointing the respective tutors to make intimatione to others hic inde of the tyme of Inventaring the writtes and Charter Chist, And that when the former petition was presented James Carnegie of Phinhaven haveing appeared readie to exped a tutorie dative bot that since that tyme The Lords of exchequer did stop the expeding of the tutorrie before he should find better Caution then what was offered And that seing the tutors nominat to the sone of the second mariadge have accepted of the office of tutorie, And that they are readie to make inventars of the defuncts writtes Therfore Craves that the Charter Chist and haill writtes might be delivered and put in the hands of the shirreff depute of Pearth or Comissasrs of St Androwes, and to allow the relict and sone of the second mariage and his tutors to have inspectione therof, and that such wrytes as belongs to them might be delivered to them, As also to ordaine that the seallings and sequestrationes of all trunks Cloathes and other things belonging to the relict and sone of the second marriage to be taken off, That the samen may be delivered to them, And the saids Lords haveing Supperceided to give answer to the said petition Befor Phinhaven should be allowed to see and answer the samen, And now it was Humbly represented for the said Alexander Blair of Kinfauns Sone and air of the first mariage and Phinhaven his tutor That the desyre of the forsaid petition might not be granted and the forsaid deliverance of Councill upon the petition given in be the relict and sone of the second marriadge, allowing him and his tutors to be present at the inventaring of the defuncts papers ought to be rescinded Because when the forsaid deliverance was obtained It was parte in audita, And against the sone as air of the first marraige ane pupill and infant indefencles he haveing then no tutor to act or doe for him or manage his affairs Bot now Phinhaven haveing exped his tutory, he alledges that no such deliverance of Councill could have past if the pupill had then given his defences, Because all that the relect and sone of the first marriage can pretend to is only that they are Creditors to the deceast Kinfauns be the Ladies Contract of Marraige, And it is a Certaine principall in law, That Creditors as simple personall Creditors have no intresses neither to Crave exhibitione of the debitors Charter Chist for if that ware allowed then every Creditor might Crave exhibition of their debitors Chartor chist and propale the samen Which was never allowed to any person as a Simple Creditor, And seing the relict and sone of the second marriage has no other intrest Bot as pretended Creditors, They ought not not2 to be allowed to be present at the Sighting and inventaring of the defuncts Chartor chist And this being properly a Civill action, It is not competent to the Lords of privy Councill, Bot only to the Lords of session, And when the relict and sone of the second mariadge shall pursue for exhibition of any papers quherin they can pretend to have any intrest They shall have ane ansuer and in this case they can pretend no intrest at all, for the estates of Kinfauns haveing come by ane heritrix the sone of the second marriage can never have ane intrest in the Same Seing ther is not only a sone of the first marriage Bot Lykewayes a daughter, and that the estate is never to goe to the sone of the second marriage Bot failling of the Childrein of the first Marriadge, The estate is to goe to the deceast Sir William Blair of Kinfauns his airs quhatsomever, So that in no event the sone of the second marriage can have right to the samen, And Therfore neither the relict nor the sone of the second marriage Ought to be allowed to have inspectione of the writtes and Chartor Chist, Seing Phinhaven has now exped his tutory, And he as tutor has the only intrest as is appointed by the act of Parliament to make Inventar of all the writtes And to have the Custodie of the Chartor Chist and is to be answerable to his pupill And Therfor Humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be humbly pleased to take the premisses to their Consideratione And not only to refuse the desyre of the relict and her sone there petition, Bot Lykewayes to Rescind the former deliverance of Councill allowing the sone of the second mariadge and his tutors to be present at the inventarie of the deceast Kinfauns his writtes and Chartor Chist It being a great prejudice to the pupill that any persone should have inspectione who have no intrest as the said other petitione also bears The Lords of their Majesties Privy Councill haveing heard the above petitione given in to them be the above Ladie Kinfauns and her sone with the said3 other petitione given by way of answer for the Laird of Kinfauns and his tutors They Remitt both petitiones to the Lords of Sesion, And Recomends to them to give such orders and determinationes therin as they shall find Just, and that also sumarly and speedily as can be according to Law.

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/7/131

Act

Act and Remit The Lady Kinfaunes and her Sone and the Laird of Kinfauns and his tutor

Anent the two severall petitiones given and presented to the Lords of their majesties privy Councill The one therof at the instance of John Carnegie sone of the second mariadge of the deceast Alexander Carneige of Kinfauns Margrat Nairne relict of the said Alexander Carnegie for her self and as tutor to her said sone and his remanent tutors Shewing That quher the petitioners haveing formerly applyed to the saids Lords representing the intrest they hade to see the defuncts papers Inventared The saids Lords Did allow the tutors of the Childrein of both mariadges to be present at the inventaring of the defuncts writtes, And appoynted the tutors of the Childrein of aither Mariadges to make intimation hinc inde of the tyme of Inventaring and accordingly the petitioner did intimat the saids Lords act, Bot In respect the former act did not Clearly authorize the petitioner to inspect or Inventar by themselves, And that Phinhaven the tutor dative of the sone of the first mariadge hath both lately exped his tutory The petitioners doe againe beg libertie to lay before the saids Lords the grounds upon which they clame ane intrest to see, And In Respect the defuncts writtes and also his haill moveables, And farder intreat that the saids Lords would render the ordinance effectuall and authorize the petitioner at the sight of any Judge ordinary to have Inspection, If Phinhaven Should ommitt to make Inventars according to law for the reasones following viz Primo The petitioner the sone of the second mariadge is a Creditor in five hundred pund sterling his mothers contract, And the petitioner the relict is Creditor by the same Contract in ane lifrent annuitie of two Thousand five Hundred merks, And they hade reason to beleive that the defunct hade done some speciall deed in their favors, And allocat ane certaine fond for Implement of the forsaid provisiones, Secundo the sone of the second mariadge has the right of successione faillieing the only sone of the first And as the law for the securitie of the intrest of minors hade appointed Inventars to be Judicially made to the effect that the Condition of the estate might be publictly knowen to every persone interessted, Much more hath the nixt air ane speciall intrest to see that these Inventars be fairly made, The Raither because the Estate of Kinfauns came by the defuncts first Lady, hath some specialities as to the succession therin faillieng airs male of that marriadge which the petitioner Ought to see and know Tertio the petitioner the relict is executrix Creditrix etc firmed and hath confirmed the annualrents of the severall heretaball bonds lying by the defunct, and therby is concerned to see these bonds, Quarto the greatest part of the defuncts estate doeth consist in bonds and rights upon the Earle of Northesks estate, and Phinhaven being the nixt and Immediat air to this present Earle of Northesk, If the Earle should happen to decease without airs Phinhaven the tutor would succeid and become debitor and tutor to the Creditor, And Therfore It was more reasonable that a very speciall and particular Inventar should be made of these writtes, both for securitie of the pupill if he live and of the airs of the second marriadge In caice of his decease Quinto seing the law does appoint tutors to make Inventars of the defuncts wholl means It was necessary that the saids Lords should Limitt a particular tyme betwixt and which these inventars should be made to the petitioners of all dyets of inspectione of the writtes or other moveables that they might be present with Certification to Phinhaven if he faillied that the saids Lords would authorize the petitioners to have inspection of the saids writtes, and that he might Inventar the moveables at any tyme after the said dyet at the sight of any Judge ordinary, With power to the said Judge ordinary to make patent the doors of the house Erroll and of the severall Coffers, Trunks, Cabinetts or others, wher the papers or other moveables Lye And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords to prefixx a certaine dyet to Phinhaven the tutor of the first mariadge for making inventars of the defuncts writtes and estate heretaball or moveable And appoint Phinhaven to make intimatione to the petitioners of the severall dyets that he is to have inspectione in order to inventaring, And Discharge his inspectione untill he should make the forsaid intimatione to them, As also to Discharge his midleing and intromission as tutor, untill the forsaid inventars be made Conforme to the act of Parliament, And in caice of the tutors faillieing to Inspect and Compleit the forsaid Inventars betwixt and the forsaid dyet, That the Lords would authorize the petitioners to have inspection of the forsaid writtes, And to have such of the said writtes as are conceaved in their favors delivered up to them upon Inventar and recept And also that they might have access to inventar the moveaballs in order to confirmatione, And Lykewayes that the petitioner the relicts body Cloathes and parapharnalia that should be found amongst the defuncts moveables might be Delivered up to her upon recept, And that at the sight of any of the saids Lords number or any of the Lords of session or other Judge ordinary, with power to the saids Judges to make open doors of the house of Erroll and other places, And of the severall trunks Coffers, &c: wher the defuncts wrytes and moveables Lye as the said petitione bears And the other of the saids petitiones by way of answer to the forsaid petitione at the instance of Alexander Blair of Kinfauns and James Carnegie of Phinhaven his tutor Shewing That quheras Margaret Nairn relict of the deceast Alexander Carnegie of Kinfauns and John Carnegie his Sone and his tutors haveing given in a Petition to the saids Lords Representing that the relict being Creditor to her husband for the soume of Two thousand five hundred merks of Joyntur and her sone for five hundred punds sterling for his provision, haveing formerly Applyed to the saids Lords, That they might have access to have inspectione of the Laird of Kinfauns his writtes at the makeing of the inventars by the tutor of the petitioner the sone and air of the first mariage and might have such papers delivered to them as should be found to belong to them And that the saids Lords therupon hade allowed the sone of the second marriage to be present at the inventaring of the defuncts papers and appointing the respective tutors to make intimatione to others hic inde of the tyme of Inventaring the writtes and Charter Chist, And that when the former petition was presented James Carnegie of Phinhaven haveing appeared readie to exped a tutorie dative bot that since that tyme The Lords of exchequer did stop the expeding of the tutorrie before he should find better Caution then what was offered And that seing the tutors nominat to the sone of the second mariadge have accepted of the office of tutorie, And that they are readie to make inventars of the defuncts writtes Therfore Craves that the Charter Chist and haill writtes might be delivered and put in the hands of the shirreff depute of Pearth or Comissasrs of St Androwes, and to allow the relict and sone of the second mariage and his tutors to have inspectione therof, and that such wrytes as belongs to them might be delivered to them, As also to ordaine that the seallings and sequestrationes of all trunks Cloathes and other things belonging to the relict and sone of the second marriage to be taken off, That the samen may be delivered to them, And the saids Lords haveing Supperceided to give answer to the said petition Befor Phinhaven should be allowed to see and answer the samen, And now it was Humbly represented for the said Alexander Blair of Kinfauns Sone and air of the first mariage and Phinhaven his tutor That the desyre of the forsaid petition might not be granted and the forsaid deliverance of Councill upon the petition given in be the relict and sone of the second marriadge, allowing him and his tutors to be present at the inventaring of the defuncts papers ought to be rescinded Because when the forsaid deliverance was obtained It was parte in audita, And against the sone as air of the first marraige ane pupill and infant indefencles he haveing then no tutor to act or doe for him or manage his affairs Bot now Phinhaven haveing exped his tutory, he alledges that no such deliverance of Councill could have past if the pupill had then given his defences, Because all that the relect and sone of the first marriage can pretend to is only that they are Creditors to the deceast Kinfauns be the Ladies Contract of Marraige, And it is a Certaine principall in law, That Creditors as simple personall Creditors have no intresses neither to Crave exhibitione of the debitors Charter Chist for if that ware allowed then every Creditor might Crave exhibition of their debitors Chartor chist and propale the samen Which was never allowed to any person as a Simple Creditor, And seing the relict and sone of the second marriage has no other intrest Bot as pretended Creditors, They ought not not2 to be allowed to be present at the Sighting and inventaring of the defuncts Chartor chist And this being properly a Civill action, It is not competent to the Lords of privy Councill, Bot only to the Lords of session, And when the relict and sone of the second mariadge shall pursue for exhibition of any papers quherin they can pretend to have any intrest They shall have ane ansuer and in this case they can pretend no intrest at all, for the estates of Kinfauns haveing come by ane heritrix the sone of the second marriage can never have ane intrest in the Same Seing ther is not only a sone of the first marriage Bot Lykewayes a daughter, and that the estate is never to goe to the sone of the second marriage Bot failling of the Childrein of the first Marriadge, The estate is to goe to the deceast Sir William Blair of Kinfauns his airs quhatsomever, So that in no event the sone of the second marriage can have right to the samen, And Therfore neither the relict nor the sone of the second marriage Ought to be allowed to have inspectione of the writtes and Chartor Chist, Seing Phinhaven has now exped his tutory, And he as tutor has the only intrest as is appointed by the act of Parliament to make Inventar of all the writtes And to have the Custodie of the Chartor Chist and is to be answerable to his pupill And Therfor Humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be humbly pleased to take the premisses to their Consideratione And not only to refuse the desyre of the relict and her sone there petition, Bot Lykewayes to Rescind the former deliverance of Councill allowing the sone of the second mariadge and his tutors to be present at the inventarie of the deceast Kinfauns his writtes and Chartor Chist It being a great prejudice to the pupill that any persone should have inspectione who have no intrest as the said other petitione also bears The Lords of their Majesties Privy Councill haveing heard the above petitione given in to them be the above Ladie Kinfauns and her sone with the said3 other petitione given by way of answer for the Laird of Kinfauns and his tutors They Remitt both petitiones to the Lords of Sesion, And Recomends to them to give such orders and determinationes therin as they shall find Just, and that also sumarly and speedily as can be according to Law.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 74r-76v.

2. Sic.

3. Insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 74r-76v.

2. Sic.

3. Insertion.

Procedure: committee formed, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/7/121

Procedure: committee formed

Committie Home qra Dunlop

The Lybell at the instance of Patrick Home of Colringhamlaw and Mary Corser his spouse Against James Dunlop Chamberland to the Laird of Moristoune being Called and the pursuars Compeiring personally with Mr George Dicksone advocat their procurator, and the defender Compeiring also personally with James Stewart senior his advocat The Lords of their majesties privy Councill haveing Considered the Lybell and answers made therto, And haveing heard both parties advocats, They Admitt the Lybell to the pursuars probation, And the haill witnesses except John Ramsay in Coldinghame haveing Compeired and made faith at the barr The Lords Remitts to the Lairds of Blackbarrony and Leyes, Sir William Lockhart and Sir Patrick Murray to examine the saids witnesses and Declaires any two of them to be a suficient quorum, And Reserves the objectiones Which may be made against the witnesses to be proponed and discussed before the Committie.

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years

D1692/7/121

Procedure: committee formed

Committie Home qra Dunlop

The Lybell at the instance of Patrick Home of Colringhamlaw and Mary Corser his spouse Against James Dunlop Chamberland to the Laird of Moristoune being Called and the pursuars Compeiring personally with Mr George Dicksone advocat their procurator, and the defender Compeiring also personally with James Stewart senior his advocat The Lords of their majesties privy Councill haveing Considered the Lybell and answers made therto, And haveing heard both parties advocats, They Admitt the Lybell to the pursuars probation, And the haill witnesses except John Ramsay in Coldinghame haveing Compeired and made faith at the barr The Lords Remitts to the Lairds of Blackbarrony and Leyes, Sir William Lockhart and Sir Patrick Murray to examine the saids witnesses and Declaires any two of them to be a suficient quorum, And Reserves the objectiones Which may be made against the witnesses to be proponed and discussed before the Committie.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 74r.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 74r.

Sederunt, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years1

D1692/7/112

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Melvill pr: Seall; Duke of Queensberry; Earl of Drumlanrig; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Broadalbine; Viscount Tarbat; Viscount Stair; Lord Montgomrie; Lord Raith; Lord Cardross; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Carmicheall; Master of Forbes; Mr Johnston Secret; Lord Hatton; Lord Fountonhall; Lord Enstruther; Laird of Blackbarrony; Laird of Leyes; Laird of Pollock; Sir Thomas Livingston; Sir William Lockhart

Edinburgh the fourtein day of Jully Jaj vjc nyntie two years1

D1692/7/112

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Melvill pr: Seall; Duke of Queensberry; Earl of Drumlanrig; Earl of Linlithgow; Earl of Lothian; Earl of Forfar; Earl of Broadalbine; Viscount Tarbat; Viscount Stair; Lord Montgomrie; Lord Raith; Lord Cardross; Lord Beilhaven; Lord Carmicheall; Master of Forbes; Mr Johnston Secret; Lord Hatton; Lord Fountonhall; Lord Enstruther; Laird of Blackbarrony; Laird of Leyes; Laird of Pollock; Sir Thomas Livingston; Sir William Lockhart

1. NRS, PC2/24, 73v.

2. NRS, PC2/24, 73v.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 73v.

2. NRS, PC2/24, 73v.

Order, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteint day of Jullij Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/7/371

Order

[Order, Heretors of Midlothian]

The Heretors of Midlothian who are not yet discussed by the Councill or there Comittee, are ordered by the Councill to attend the Comittee on tuesday next at ten of the Cloack in the forenoon.

At Edinburgh 14 July 1692

A1692/7/371

Order

[Order to Heritors of Midlothian]

The heritors of Midlothian who are not yet discussed by the council or their committee are ordered by the council to attend the committee on Tuesday next at ten o’clock in the forenoon.

1. PC1/48, 320.

1. PC1/48, 320.

1. PC1/48, 320.

1. PC1/48, 320.

Act, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteint day of Jullij Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/7/361

Act

Liberation Ensigne Loudon

The Lords of there majestyes privie Councill doe hereby give order and warrand to the magistrats of Edinburgh Bailzies of the Canongate and Keeper of ther tolbooth To sett at Liberty Ensigne John Loudone present prisoner in there said tolbooth who wes seized upon suspicion of dissaffectione to the government when there wes ane rumor of ane Invasione which is now over He first finding sufficient Cautione acted in the books of privie Councill That he shall Live peaceablie and with all submission to the present Government of there majestyes King William and Queen Mary And that he shall not act Consult nor contryve any thing in prejudice thereof And that he shall not converse with rebells And that he shall appear befor the saids Lords of privie Councill when called for under the penalty of Ane Hundreth pound Sterling money.

At Edinburgh 14 JUly 1692

A1692/7/361

Act

Liberation of Ensign Loudon

The lords of their majesties’ privy council do hereby give order and warrant to the magistrates of Edinburgh, baillies of the Canongate and keeper of their tolbooth to set at Liberty Ensign John Loudon, present prisoner in their said tolbooth, who was seized upon suspicion of disaffection to the government when there was a rumour of an invasion which is now over, he first finding sufficient caution acted in the books of privy council that he shall live peaceably and with all submission to the present government of their majesties King William and Queen Mary, and that he shall not act, consult or contrive anything in prejudice thereof, and that he shall not converse with rebels, and that he shall appear before the said Lords of privy council when called for under the penalty of one hundred pounds sterling money.

1. PC1/48, 320.

1. PC1/48, 320.

Act, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteint day of Jullij Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/7/351

Act

Liberation Sir Patrick Maxwell of Springkell

Anent the petitione given in to the Lords of there majestyes privie Councill be Sir Patrick Maxwell off Springkell barronett Shewing That where the petitioner being under bond to appear befor there Lordships when called under the penalty of Six Thousand merks And he in obedience thereto haveing appeared in the begining of Junij Last wes with severall others committed prisoner to the Canongate tolbooth And sieing the saids Lords have been pleased to Liberate others in the petitioners Circumstances And that it is now evident there is no ground to Continow him prisoner And therefore craveing that there Lordships would be pleased to grant order and warrand for the petitioners Liberty upon Cautione to appear when called, As the said petitione bears The Saids Lords of there majestyes privie Councill Haveing considered this petition Given in to them be the above Sir Patrick Maxwell of Springkell They hereby give order and warrand to the magistrats of Edinburgh Bailzies of the Canongate and Keeper of there tolbooth to sett at Liberty the petitioner In respect he hes found sufficient Cautione acted in the books of privie Councill That he shall Live peaceably and with all submissione to the present government of there majesties King William and Queen Mary And that he shall not act consult nor contryve any thing in prejudice thereof nor shall not converse with rebells And that he shall appear befor the saids Lords of privie Councill when called for under the penalty of six thousand merks Scotts money And appoints the Clerks of Councill upon receaveing of thir bonds to give up to the petitioner his former bond.

At Edinburgh 14 July 1692

A1692/7/351

Act

Liberation of Sir Patrick Maxwell of Springkell

Concerning the petition given in to the lords of their majesties’ privy council by Sir Patrick Maxwell of Springkell baronet, showing that where the petitioner being under bond to appear before their lordships when called under the penalty of six thousand merks, and he in obedience thereto having appeared in the beginning of June last was with several others committed prisoner to the Canongate tolbooth, and seeing the said lords have been pleased to liberate others in the petitioner’s circumstances, and that it is now evident there is no ground to continue him prisoner, and therefore craving that their lordships would be pleased to grant order and warrant for the petitioner’s liberty upon caution to appear when called, as the said petition bears. The said lords of their majesties’ privy council having considered this petition given in to them by the above Sir Patrick Maxwell of Springkell they hereby give order and warrant to the magistrates of Edinburgh, baillies of the Canongate and keeper of their tolbooth to set at liberty the petitioner in respect he has found sufficient caution acted in the books of privy council that he shall live peaceably and with all submission to the present government of their majesties King William and Queen Mary, and that he shall not act, consult nor contrive anything in prejudice thereof, nor shall converse with rebels, and that he shall appear before the said lords of privy council when called for under the penalty of six thousand merks scots money, and appoints the clerks of council upon receiving of their bonds to give up to the petitioner his former bond.

1. PC1/48, 319-20.

1. PC1/48, 319-20.

Act, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteint day of Jullij Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/7/341

Act

Act Mr James Chalmers for stipend

Anent the petitione Given in to the Lords of there Majestyes privie Councill be Mr James Chalmers minister at Kirkpatrick Fleming Shewing That the petitioner served the Cure of the said Church untill the moneth of […] Jaj vjc Eightie nyne at at2 which tyme he wes Laid asyde from the exercise of his ministerie thereof where he hade served for severall years to the satisfactione of all his parochiners and being Legallie presented and admitted thereto Hes undoubted right to that years stipend And since his being Laid asyde There hes been no preaching in his church nor any meeting house in his paroch And sieing the said year Jaj vjc and Eightie Nyne and Jaj vjc Nyntie is now at the saids Lords there disposeall And that none pretends right thereto And that the pariochiners thereof are Inclyned in Consideration of the great necessityes and straitts the poor petitioner and his numerous family are redacted to, To make payment to him of the vacant stipends a forsaid as is Instructed by a letter produced with the said petitione under the hand of ane of the principall and most considerable heretors of his paroch And therefore craveing that the saids [Lords] would be pleased to ordaine the heretors and others Lyable in payment of the said stipend to make payment thereof to the petitioner for the saids tuo years In regaird he hes Legallie served for one and that there is none pretending interest in the other As the said petitione bears The Saids Lords of there Majestyes privie Councill Haveing considered the said petitione Given in to them be the said Mr James Chalmers minister at Kirkpatrick Fleming with the tuo severall consents be some of the heretors In favours of the petitioner whereof one is by way of missive as mentioned in the petitione They hereby allow to the petitioner the stipend of the said kirk of Kirkpatrick Fleming (In case the same be not of there Majestyes patronadge) And that for the cropts and years of God Jaj vjc Eighty Nyne and Jaj vjc Nyntie years And ordaines him to be readiely ansuered obeyed and payed thereof be the heretors fewers wodsetters fermorers titulars tacksmen of teynds tennents possessors and others Lyable in payment of the samen And ordaines Letters of horning at his instance againest them for that effect He produceing a decreet of Locality And in case there be none ordaines these Lyable and in use and wont of payment of the samen stipend To make payment to the petitioner of there respective proportions3 of the said tuo years stipend according as they shall be decerned be the Judge ordinarie In respect the petitioner hes given in to the Clerks of Councill ane obleidgement subsvryved be him Binding and obleidgeing himself That for the future he shall pray for there majesties King William and Queen Mary as King and Queen of this Realme.

At Edinburgh 14 July 1692

A1692/7/341

Act

Act to Mr James Chalmers for stipend

Concerning the petition given in to the lords of their majesties’ privy council by Mr James Chalmers, minister at Kirkpatrick-Fleming, showing that the petitioner served the cure of the said church until the month of […] Eightie nyne at which tyme he was laid aside from the exercise of his ministry thereof where he had served for several years to the satisfaction of all his parishioners and being legally presented and admitted thereto, has undoubted right to that year’s stipend, and since his being laid aside there has been no preaching in his church nor any meeting house in his parish, and seeing the said year 1689 and 1690 is now at the said lords their disposal, and that none pretends right thereto, and that the parishioners thereof are inclined in consideration of the great necessities and straits the poor petitioner and his numerous family are reduced to, to make payment to him of the vacant stipends a forsaid as is instructed by a letter produced with the said petition under the hand of one of the principal and most considerable heritors of his parish, and therefore craving that the said lords would be pleased to ordain the heritors and others liable in payment of the said stipend to make payment thereof to the petitioner for the said two years, in regard he has legally served for one and that there is none pretending interest in the other, as the said petition bears. The said lords of their majesties’ privy council having considered the said petition given in to them by the said Mr James Chalmers, minister at Kirkpatrick-Fleming, with the two several consents by some of the heritors in favour of the petitioner, whereof one is by way of missive as mentioned in the petition, they hereby allow to the petitioner the stipend of the said kirk of Kirkpatrick-Fleming (in case the same be not of their majesties’ patronage) and that for the crops and years of God 1689 and 1690, and ordain him to be readily answered, obeyed and paid thereof by the heritors, feuers, wadsetters, fermers, titulars, tacksmen of teinds, tennent possessors and others liable in payment of the same, and ordain letters of horning at his instance against them for that effect, he producing a decreet of locality, and in case there be none ordain those liable and in use and wont of payment of the same stipend, to make payment to the petitioner of their respective proportions of the said two years’ stipend according as they shall be decerned by the judge ordinary in respect the petitioner has given in to the clerks of council an obligement subscribed by him binding and obliging himself that for the future he shall pray for their majesties King William and Queen Mary as King and Queen of this realme.

1. PC1/48, 318-19.

2. Sic.

3. The word ‘there’ scored out here.

1. PC1/48, 318-19.

Procedure: committee, 14 July 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Fourteint day of Jullij Jaj vjc nyntie tuo years

A1692/7/331

Procedure: committee

Comittee anent the ministers of Leith

The Lords of there Majestyes privie Councill haveing Considered a petitione Given in to them be the magistrats of Leith anent the ministers of the south kirk of Leith They hereby recomend to the Earle of Lothian The Lords viscounts Tarbat and Stair the Lord Carmichaell and Laird of Blackbarrony or any three of them to meet with both pairtyes and endeavour to setle and agree them in this effair And recomends to the moderator and remanent ministers of the presbitry of Edinburgh to appoint some of there Number to meet with the said Comittee the morrow in the forenoon in the Councill Chamber.

At Edinburgh 14 July 1692

A1692/7/331

Procedure: committee

Committee concerning the ministers of Leith

The lords of their majesties’ privy council having considered a petition given in to them by the magistrates of Leith concerning the ministers of the south kirk of Leith, they hereby recommend to the Earl of Lothian, the lords viscounts Tarbat and Stair, the Lord Carmichael and laird of Blackbarony, or any three of them, to meet with both parties and endeavour to settle and agree them in this affair, and recommends to the moderator and remaining ministers of the presbytery of Edinburgh to appoint some of their Number to meet with the said committee the morrow in the forenoon in the council chamber.

1. PC1/48, 318.

1. PC1/48, 318.