Order, 7 March 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Sevinth day of March Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/3/51

Order

Sailling orders for Captain Thomas Gordon

By the Lords of her Majesties most honourable privie Councell of the Kingdome of Scotland The Instructions following are given to Captain Thomas Gordon Commander of her Majesties Ship the Royal William, and Commander of the Scots friggotts, In prosecution and for better executeing of his Commission, And to be by him punctuallie observed wpon his perrill.
First Yow are att and against the first day of Apryll nixt to come to Saill from the Road of Leith to the Northward In company with the Royall Mary Commanded by Captain James Hamillton, who is to receive orders from yow from tyme to tyme, as Comadore, And take wnder your Convoy all vessells bound that way, And carefullie see each of them Safe into ther respective harbours so farr as Orknay Then yow are to returne and Call along the Coast for all vessells bound to the First, Secundlie, If no vessells be ready to come out of harbours when yow call, yow are to cruise ten dayes betwixt Tinmouth barr and Orknay, And Call at Tinmouth for what vessells may be ther, bound for the firth whom yow are carefully to See within the Island of May, Then yow are to return to the Northward as farr as Orknay, and bring alonge with yow all vessells that are ready. Thirdly Att any tyme when yow come to Leith Road, If ther be Ships bound for London, yow are carefully to See them the length of Tinmouth-barr, And bring from thence all Ships as yow are appoynted. above; all which yow are to observe dureing the tyme the Ship is keept in pay. Fourthly, yow are carfully from tyme to tyme to advyse ws of all that occurrs dureing your cruise. Fiftly yow are to defend yourselfe againd all Ships wnder your Convoy Against all her Majesties enemies, whither French or Spanish, and all others with whom her Majestie Is at present ingaged in warr, who shall presume to attack yow, to the outtermost of your power, And to endeavour by all your force to Subdue them, and make and bring them in as pryze to be declaired such. Sixtly yow are also as yow find occasion, and yourselfe in condition, to attack and sett up all her Majesties Saids enemies, And endeavour by all 2 force to Subdue them, and Sease ther Ships and goods. Sevinthly. Yow are also to Search all Ships goeing to or comeing from France or Spaine, or any of the dominions belonging to the saids Kingdoms, And if yow find them carrieing Counterband goods to any enemies Countrie, To Sease them ther Ships and haill goods, and bring them in as pryze. Eightly. Yow are to keep exact Journalls of all that occurs dureing your Cruize, And to observe the tyme of your Cruizeing, And all other articles Contained in your Contract with the Lords of her Majesties Theasaury, Given att Edinburgh the Sevinth day of March Jaj vijc and Six years.

At Edinburgh 7 March 1706

A1706/3/51

Order

Sailing orders for Captain Thomas Gordon

By the lords of her majesty’s most honourable privy council of the kingdom of Scotland, the instructions following are given to Captain Thomas Gordon, commander of her majesty’s ship the Royal William, and commander of the Scots frigates, in prosecution and for better executing of his commission, and to be by him punctually observed upon his peril.
First, you are at and against the first day of April next to come to sail from the road of Leith to the northward, in company with the Royal Mary, commanded by Captain James Hamilton, who is to receive orders from you from time to time, as commadore, and take under your convoy all vessels bound that way, and carefully see each of them safe into their respective harbours so far as Orkney. Then you are to return and call along the coast for all vessels bound to the first. Secondly, if no vessels be ready to come out of harbours when you call, you are to cruise ten days between Tynemouth bar and Orkney, and call at Tynemouth for what vessels may be there bound for the firth, whom you are carefully to see within the Isle of May, then you are to return to the northward as far as Orkney, and bring along with yow all vessels that are ready. Thirdly, at any time when you come to Leith Road, if there be ships bound for London, you are carefully to see them the length of Tynemouth bar, and bring from thence all ships as you are appointed above, all which you are to observe during the time the ship is kept in pay. Fourthly, you are carefully from time to time to advise us of all that occurs during your cruise. Fifthly, you are to defend yourself and all ships under your convoy against all her majesty’s enemies, whether French or Spanish, and all others with whom her majesty is at present engaged in war, who shall presume to attack you, to the utmost of your power, and to endeavour by all your force to subdue them, and make and bring them in as prize to be declared such. Sixthly, you are also as you find occasion, and yourself in condition, to attack and set up all her majesty’s said enemies, and endeavour by all force to subdue them, and seize their ships and goods. Seventhly, you are also to search all ships going to or coming from France or Spain, or any of the dominions belonging to the said kingdoms, and if you find them carrying contraband goods to any enemy’s country, to seize them, their ships, and whole goods, and bring them in as prize. Eighthly, you are to keep exact journals of all that occurs during your cruise, and to observe the time of your cruising, and all other articles contained in your contract with the lords of her majesty’s treasury. Given at Edinburgh 7 March 1706.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 451.

2. Sic.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 451.

Procedure, 7 March 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Sevinth day of March Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/3/41

Procedure

Exoneration In favours of Andrew Wauch as wnder Clerk of Councell

The Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell doe heirby recommend to the Earle of Lauderdale, Lord President of Session, Lord Register, Lord Justice Clerk, and Mr Francis Montgomrie or any one of them to Call for Sir Gilbert Elliot of Minto, one of the Senators of the Colledge of Justice, And Andrew Wauch wryter In Edinburgh, Servant to the two Clerks of Privie Councell, and intrusted by them in the said office, and take ther oaths that they have non of the bonds, warrands, processes, depositions taken theron, or grounds therof, Registers, Records, King or Queens Letters, Proclamations, Seall and Cashet of Councell, or any keyes belonging therto, And that they have not fraudfully abstracted or putt away any of them, And to report to the Counsell That the said Sir Gilbert Elliot and Andrew Wauch may be fully and freely exonered and discharged therof, And of ther said Service and trust In the said office in all tyme comeing, And that betwixt and the nixt Councell day; According to which appoyntment the said lord Justice Clerk haveing Called for the said Andrew Wauch and examined him on his great oath, He deponed as his deposition extant bears, And the said Lord Justice Clerk haveing this day Reported to the Saids Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell, that the said Andrew Wauch had given his oath in the termes of the Remitt of Councell theranent, And the saids Lords haveing considered the Samen, with the said Andrew his oath and deposition, which was read in their presence, Bearing that he hes non of the bonds, warrands, processes, depositions taken theron, or grounds therof, Registers, Records, King or Queens Letters, Proclamations, Seall and Cashet of Councell, or any keyes belonging to the Said Councell office, And that he hes not fraudfully abstracted, or away putt any of them The Saids Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell have not only Exonered and discharged, Lykeas they heirby for for2 now and ever Exoner and discharge the said Andrew Wauch of his trust and Service that he had in the said privie Counsell office and Chamber, But also have declaired him quyte therof, and free therfrae, and of any trouble therfore, or being called to ane account for any thing concerneing the Samen, or his Service and trust theranent in all tyme comeing.

At Edinburgh 7 March 1706

A1706/3/41

Procedure

Exoneration in favour of Andrew Wauch as under clerk of council

The lords of her majesty’s privy council do hereby recommend to [John Maitland] the earl of Lauderdale, [Sir Hew Dalrymple] lord president of session, [Sir James Murray of Philiphaugh] lord register, [Adam Cockburn] lord justice clerk and Mr Francis Montgomerie, or any one of them, to call for Sir Gilbert Elliot of Minto, one of the senators of the college of justice, and Andrew Wauch, writer in Edinburgh, servant to the two clerks of privy council, and entrusted by them in the said office, and take their oaths that they have none of the bonds, warrants, processes, depositions taken thereon, or grounds thereof, registers, records, kings’ or queens’ letters, proclamations, seals of council, or any keys belonging thereto, and that they have not fraudulently abstracted or put away any of them, and to report to the council, that the said Sir Gilbert Elliot and Andrew Wauch may be fully and freely exonerated and discharged thereof, and of their said service and trust in the said office in all time coming, and that between [now] and the next council day. According to which appointment the said lord justice clerk, having called for the said Andrew Wauch and examined him on his great oath, he deponed as his deposition extant bears, and the said lord justice clerk having this day reported to the said lords of her majesty’s privy council that the said Andrew Wauch had given his oath in the terms of the remit of council thereon, and the said lords having considered the same, with the said Andrew his oath and deposition, which was read in their presence, bearing that he has none of the bonds, warrants, processes, depositions taken thereon, or grounds thereof, registers, records, kings’ or queens’ letters, proclamations, seals of council, or any keys belonging to to the said council office, and that he has not fraudulently abstracted or away put any of them, the said lords of her majesty’s privy council have not only exonerated and discharged, likewise they hereby for now and ever exonerate and discharge the said Andrew Wauch of his trust and service that he had in the said privy council office and chamber, but also have declared him quite thereof, and free therefrom, and of any trouble therefore, or being called to an account for any thing concerning the same, or his service and trust therein, in all time coming.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 450-1.

2. Sic.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 450-1.

Procedure, 7 March 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Sevinth day of March Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/3/31

Procedure

Exoneration In favours of Sir Gilbert Elliot of Minto as Clerk of Councell

The Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell Doe heirby Recommend to the Earle of Lauderdale Lord President of Session, Lord Register, Lord Justice Clerk and Mr Francis Montgomrie, or any one of them to Call for Sir Gilbert Elliot of Minto, one of the Senators of the Colledge of Justice, And Andrew Wauch wryter in Edinburgh, Servant to the two Clerks of Privie Councell, and intrusted by them in the said office, and take ther oaths, That they have non of the Bonds, warrands, processes, depositions taken theron, or grounds therof, Registers, Records, King or Queens Letters, Proclamations, Seall and Cashet of Counsell, or any keyes belonging therto, And that they have not fraudfully abstracted or putt away any of them, And to report to the Councell, That the Saids Sir Gilbert Elliot and Andrew Wauch may be fully and freely exonered and discharged therof, And of ther Said Service and trust in the said office In all tyme comeing, And that betwixt and the nixt Councell day, According to which appoyntment the Lord Justice Clerk one of the Said Committie, having Called for the Said Sir Gilbert Elliot and examined him on his great oath, He deponed that to the best of his memory and knowledge he hes non of the bonds, warrands, processes, depositions taken theron, or grounds therof, Registers, Records, King or Queens letters, proclamations, Seall and Cashet of Councell, or any keyes belonging to the Councell office, And that he had not fraudfullie abstracted or putt away any of them, which was truth as he Should answer to God, As his deposition extant in proces bears, And the said Lord Justice Clerk haveing this day reported to the Saids Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell, that the said Sir Gilbert Elliot had given his oath in the terms of the remitt of Councell theranent; And the Saids Lords haveing considered the Samen with the said Sir Gilbert his oath and deposition which was read in their presence, The Saids Lords of her Majesties privie Councell have not only exonered and discharged, Lykeas they heirby for now and ever Exoner and discharge the said Sir Gilbert Elliot of his trust and Service that he had In the said privie Councell office and Chamber, But also have declaired and heirby declairs him quyte therof, and free therfrae, and of any trouble therfor, or being called to ane account for any thing concerning the Samen, or his Service and trust theranent in all tyme comeing.

At Edinburgh 7 March 1706

A1706/3/31

Procedure

Exoneration in favour of Sir Gilbert Elliot of Minto as clerk of council

The lords of her majesty’s privy council do hereby recommend to [John Maitland] the earl of Lauderdale, [Sir Hew Dalrymple] lord president of session, [Sir James Murray of Philiphaugh] lord register, [Adam Cockburn] lord justice clerk and Mr Francis Montgomerie, or any one of them, to call for Sir Gilbert Elliot of Minto, one of the senators of the college of justice, and Andrew Wauch, writer in Edinburgh, servant to the two clerks of privy council, and entrusted by them in the said office, and take their oaths, that they have none of the bonds, warrants, processes, depositions taken thereon, or grounds thereof, registers, records, kings’ or queens’ letters, proclamations, seals of council, or any keys belonging thereto, and that they have not fraudulently abstracted or put away any of them, and to report to the council, that the said Sir Gilbert Elliot and Andrew Wauch may be fully and freely exonerated and discharged thereof, and of their said service and trust in the said offices in all time coming. And that between [now] and the next council day. According to which appointment the lord justice clerk, one of the said committee, having called for the said Sir Gilbert Elliot and examined him on his great oath, he deposed that to the best of his memory and knowledge he has none of the bonds, warrants, processes, depositions taken thereon, or grounds thereof, registers, records, kings’ or queens’ letters, proclamations, seals of council, or any keys belonging to the council office, and that he had not fraudulently abstracted or put away any of them, which was [the] truth as he should answer to God, as his deposition extant in process bears. And the said lord justice clerk having this day reported to the said lords of her majesty’s privy council that the said Sir Gilbert Elliot had given his oath in the terms of the remit of council thereon. And the said lords having considered the same with the said Sir Gilbert his oath and deposition, which was read in their presence, the said lords of her majesty’s privy council have not only exonerated and discharged, likewise they hereby for now and ever exonerate and discharge the said Sir Gilbert Elliot of his trust and service that he had in the said privy council office and chamber, but also have declared and hereby declare him quit thereof, and free therefore, and of any trouble therefor, or being called to an account for anything concerning the same, or his service and trust therein, in all time coming.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 450.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 450.

Procedure, 7 March 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Sevinth day of March Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/3/21

Procedure

[Sutherland elected Preses]

In absence of the Lord high Chancellor, and Lord President of the Privie Councell, the Earle of Sutherland elected preces.

At Edinburgh 7 March 1706

A1706/3/21

Procedure

[Sutherland elected preses]

In absence of [James Ogilvie, earl of Seafield] the lord high chancellor and lord president of the privy council, [John Gordon] the earl of Sutherland elected preses.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 450.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 450.

Sederunt, 7 March 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Sevinth day of March Jaj vijc and Six years1

A1706/3/12

Sederunt

Earl of Sutherland; Earl of Hadingtoun; Earl of Dunmoir; Earl of Cromartie; Lord President of Session; Lord Register; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Ensteruther; Mr Fr Montgomrie; Lord Provest of Edinburgh

At Edinburgh 7 March 17061

A1706/3/12

Sederunt

[John Gordon] earl of Sutherland; [Thomas Hamilton] earl of Haddington; [Charles Murray] earl of Dunmore; [George Mackenzie] earl of Cromartie; [Sir Hew Dalrymple] lord president of session; [Sir James Murray of Philiphaugh] lord register; [Sir James Stewart of Goodtrees] lord advocate; [Adam Cockburn] lord justice clerk; [William] Lord Anstruther; Mr Francis Montgomerie; [Sir Patrick Johnston] lord provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC1/53, 450.

2. NRS, PC1/53, 450.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 450.

2. NRS, PC1/53, 450.

Decreet, 21 February 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Twentie first day of February Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/2/151

Decreet

Decreit of Certification her Majesties Advocat Against Mr Alexander Barcklay and others

Anent the lybell and Letters of Complaint raised and persued befor the Lords of her Majesties privie Councell att the instance of Sir James Steuart her Majesties Advocat for her Interest Makeing mention that wher by the laws and acts of parliament 1690. Presbyterian Church Government is established, ratified and confirmed to be the only Government of the Church within this kingdome, and all laws or acts of parliament contrary therto or inconsistant therwith are rescinded and abolished, Lykeas by the twentie Second act of the parliament 1695. Intruding into Churches or parishes, and usurping any pairt of the Ministeriall function Is prohibite and discharged wnder all highest pains, And the execution of the said act Is Speciallie recommended to the Lords of Privie Councell, As also by ane act of Privie Councell the twelfth of July Jaj vic and nyntie all heretors or others havers of the keyes of vaccant Churches are ordained to delyver up the Same to the presbetrie of the bounds, that they may Supplie the Saids Churches from tyme to tyme till the Same be legally planted; Nevertheless it is of verity that Mr Alexander Barclay Sometyme Minister at Auchterless Shakeing off all regaird to her Majesties authority and laws, and in high Contempt of the Same, and of the Sentence of deposition pronounced against him by the Lords of Privie Councell, did wpon ane or other of the dayes of the moneths of January, February, March or Apryll last bypast, Intrude himselfe into the said parish of Auchterless, and ther sett up for a preacher, wher he Still continues, exerciseing all the pairts of the Ministeriall function, And in this his illegall and disorderly and contemptuous practice, He is supported and mantained by the residenting heretors of the said parish viz Alexander Medlrum of Hattoun, and George Gordon of Badinscoth, who tho requyred by two Severall Instruments heirwith produced In the termes of the said act of Councell, To delyver up the keyes of the said Church to the presbetrie, that they might have access to Supplie the Same by legall Ministers, untill the parish Should Call a Minister of ther own in due forme, yet they obstinatly refused so to doe, and with great insolence told they had already Called the Said Intruder, and would receive no other; By all which it is evident that the said in Alexander Barclay Is guilty of the forsaid Intrusion, And of a high and manifast contempt of the Said Sentence of deposition, And of the authority of the Church, And Laws of the kingdome establishing the Same As also that the Saids Alexander Meldrum and George Gordon are guilty airt and pairt of the saids disorders and abuses, and of ane open and willfull contempt of the said act of Councell; All which being duly proven, The Said Mr Alexander Barclay ought to be removed, and decerned to desist wnder the highest certification, as lykwayes the said Alexander Meldrum and George Gordon ought to be Sevearly punished for ther Said accession to the Said disorders, and ther open breach, and high contempt of the said act of Councell, And further decerned in expensses As the Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell Should See cause, to the terror of others to doe the lyke in tyme comeing, And Anent the charge given to the saids defenders to have compeared befor the saids Lords of our Privy Councell at a certaine day bygone To have heard and Seen Such order and course taken in the said matter as appertains wnder the pain of rebellion, and putting of them to the horne, with certification etc as in the said lybell and executions therof at more length is contained, The saids lybell at the instance of Sir James Steuart her Majesties Advocat Against Mr Alexander Barclay Sometyme Minister at Auchterless, Alexander Meldrum of Hattoun and George Gordon of Badinscoth, Being upon the threttie first day of January last Called, and parties not compearing, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councell assigned this day being the twentie first day of February instant2 to both parties to compear and be ready to debate the said day, and appoynts intimations therof to be made to the defenders for that effect, And upon the day and date of thir presents the within lybell at the instance of Sir James Stewart her Majesties Advocat Against Mr Alexander Barclay and others defenders being Called, And the persuer Compearing personallie at the barr, and the defenders being lawfullie cited oft tymes called and not Compearing, The Councell Grants certification in comunni forma, Superceeding extract till the first Tuesday of Apryll Insofarr as concerns Badinscotch and Hattoun.

At Edinburgh 21 February 1706

A1706/2/151

Decreet

Decreet of certification her majesty’s advocate against Mr Alexander Barclay and others

Concerning the libel and letters of complaint raised and pursued before the lords of her majesty’s privy council at the instance of Sir James Stewart, her majesty’s advocate, for her interest, making mention that where by the laws and acts of parliament [of] 1690, presbyterian Church government is established, ratified, and confirmed to be the only government of the Church within this kingdom, and all laws or acts of parliament contrary thereto or inconsistent therewith are rescinded and abolished; likewise by the 22nd act of the parliament [of] 1695, intruding into churches or parishes, and usurping any part of the ministerial function is prohibited and discharged under all highest pains, and the execution of the said act is specially recommended to the lords of privy council; as also by an act of privy council [of] 12 July 1690 all heritors or others, havers of the keys of vacant churches, are ordained to deliver up the same to the presbytery of the bounds, that they may supply the said churches from time to time till the same be legally planted; Nevertheless it is of verity that Mr Alexander Barclay, sometime minister at Auchterless, shaking off all regard to her majesty’s authority and laws, and in high contempt of the same, and of the sentence of deposition pronounced against him by the lords of privy council, did upon one or other of the days of the months of January, February, March, or April last bypast intrude himself into the said parish of Auchterless, and there set up for a preacher, where he still continues, exercising all the parts of the ministerial function, and in this his illegal and disorderly and contemptuous practice, he is supported and maintained by the residing heritors of the said parish viz Alexander Medlrum of Hatton and George Gordon of Badinscoth, who though required by two several instruments herewith produced in the terms of the said act of council to deliver up the keys of the said church to the presbytery, that they might have access to supply the same by legal ministers, until the parish should call a minister of their own in due form, yet they obstinately refused so to do, and with great insolence told they had already called the said intruder, and would receive no other. By all which it is evident that the said Alexander Barclay is guilty of the foresaid intrusion, and of a high and manifest contempt of the said sentence of deposition, and of the authority of the Church, and laws of the kingdom establishing the same, as also that the said Alexander Meldrum and George Gordon are guilty art and part of the said disorders and abuses, and of an open and wilful contempt of the said act of council. All which being duly proven, the said Mr Alexander Barclay ought to be removed, and decerned to desist under the highest certification, as likewise the said Alexander Meldrum and George Gordon ought to be severely punished for their said accession to the said disorders, and their open breach and high contempt of the said act of council, and further decerned in expenses as the lords of her majesty’s privy council should see cause, to the terror of others to doe the like in time coming. And concerning the charge given to the said defenders to have appeared before the said lords of our privy council at a certain day bygone to have heard and seen such order and course taken in the said matter as appertains under the pain of rebellion, and putting of them to the horn, with certification etc as in the said libel and executions thereof at more length is contained, the said libel at the instance of Sir James Stewart, her majesty’s advocate, against Mr Alexander Barclay, sometime minister at Auchterless, Alexander Meldrum of Hatton, and George Gordon of Badinscoth, being upon 31 January last called, and parties not appearing, the lords of her majesty’s privy council assigned this day, being 21 February instant, to both parties to appear and be ready to debate the said day, and appointed intimations thereof to be made to the defenders for that effect. And upon the day and date of these present the within libel at the instance of Sir James Stewart, her majesty’s advocate, against Mr Alexander Barclay and others defenders being called, and the pursuer appearing personally at the bar, and the defenders being lawfully cited [and] often called and not appearing, the council grants certification in comunni forma, superseding extract till the first Tuesday of April insofar as concerns Badinscotch and Hatton.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 449-50.

2. Insertion.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 449-50.

2. Insertion.

Commission by the Council, 21 February 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Twentie first day of February Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/2/141

Commission by the Council

Commission for Judgeing and trying house breakers etc

The Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell being Informed that John Hay younger Cap: maker att Inshyra, John Brown elder a horner, John Brown younger dragoun, Angus Fraser Horner Sophia Murray, Christian Moir, Jannet Brown, Katharine Rotsone and Janet Rotson present prisoners in the Tollbooth of Pearth, as also that George Gordon alias Mcwattie Sometyme Smith, Isobell Murray his Spous, and Sister to the said Sophia Murray, and John Anderson alias Soulie prisoners in the Tollbooth of Stirling, are alleadged guilty of the horride crymes of murder or man-Slaughter, Roberie, thift, recept of thift, and other attrocious crymes, and considering it will be great charges and expenses to bring the forsaids persons to this place In order to tryall befor the Lords Commissioners of Justiciary, besydes that severall Inconveniencies may aryse by ther transportation; And the saids Lords lykewayes considering that the saids crymes cannot be Judged and tryed by any persons in the Countrie without a warrand and Commission from them for that effect, and the saids Lords being desyreous to have the said matter brought to a tryall, that the persons guilty may receive condigne punishment, and others may be deterred from committing such crymes in tyme comeing, Doe therfor Give full power, warrand and Commission to […] Viscount of Stormount, […] Ramsay Shirreff deput of Pearth, […] Bennet Shirreff deput of Stirling, Alexander Robertson provest of Pearth, […] Christie Baillie in Stirling, Sir Patrick Murray of Auchtertyre, and […] Craigie of Dumbarnie And declairs any fyve of the forsaids persons Commissioners to be a Sufficient Quorum, one of the saids Shirreff deputs being alewayes one; And the saids Commissioners or ther said Quorum being alewayes qualified by takeing the oath of alleadgance and Subscrybeing the Same with the Asureance befor they enter wpon the execution of ther offices by vertue heirof, To take tryall of and to Judge and doe Justice wpon the foirnamed persons for the saids crymes of murder or man-slaughter, Roberie, thift, recept of thift and other crymes abovewryten, and in order therto to meet and conveine at Pearth the Twentie eight day of March nixt to come, and their to accept of this present Commission, And upon ther acceptance to administrat the oath of fidelity to the persone whom the Lord Justice Clerk or James Montgomrie of Langshaw Clerk to the Justice Court as deput to the said Lord Justice Clerk, Shall nominat depute and Substitut to be Clerk to this present Commission; With power the saids Commissioners or ther said quorum to choyse ther own Clerk (for whom they Shall be answerable) In case the said Lord Justice Clerk and James Montgomrie Shall refuse to nominat a Clerk in this matter they being first requyred so to doe, with power lykewayes to the saids persons heirby Commissionat or ther said Quorum, to creat, make and constitut, serjeants, dempsters and other members of the said Court, and to issue out and raise precepts or lybells of Indictments at the instance of […] procurator Fiscall for her Majesties Interest in the said matter against the saids John Hay younger, John Browns elder and younger Angus Fraser, Sophia Murray, Christian Moir, Janet Brown, Katharine and Janet Rotsons George Gordon, Isobell Murray and John Andersone for the crymes abovementioned for Summonding and citeing of them upon fyftein dayes by delyvering to them a full coppie of the lybell or Indytement, with the names and designations of the assyzers and wittnesses subjoyned, And for citeing the assyzers and wittnesses in the ordinary maner and wnder the pains and certifications usuall in Such cases, To Compear befor the Saids Commissioners heirby Commissionat or ther said Quorum at Pearth […] with power also to them to amerciat and fyne the absent assyzers and wittnesses, and the amerciaments and fynes to uplift for ther own use and behooff, And to adjurne themselves from tyme to tyme till the relivancie be discussed, To the effect that the pannells being fully heard, The Saids Commissioners or ther said quorum may Judge and determine the relivancie of the said lybell, and to Call ane Inquest of fourtie fyve persons who are to be cited on the assyze of the saids pannells, and a list of ther names and designations given to the saids persons accused, with ther lybells as said is, And after discussing of the relivancie of the saids lybells, In presence of the saids persons of Inquest by pronounceing Interloquitor theron, out of that number to choyse ane assyze of fyftein, and to administrat to them the ordinary oath in the usuall terms; And with power also to the saids Commissioners or ther said quorum to examine the wittnesses to be cited In presence of the saids pannells and Sworne Inquest upon the poynts that Shall be admitted to probation, And imediatly therafter without any adjurnment to remitt the said Lybell and Interloquitor to be given by them anent the relivancie therof and the depositions of the wittnesses to be taken in maner forsaid, To the knowledge of the said assyze, who without delay or goeing out of the Court are to be inclosed by themselves and are heirby appoynted to remaine so inlosed, and non Suffered to be with them, or to have access to them, or any of themselves sufferred to goe out, wntill they be aggreed and conclude ther answer, and to elect a Chancellor or president with a Clerk of ther own number, and after reading and peruseing of the said Indytement, Interloquitor to be pronounced theron, and depositions of the wittnesses to be taken in presence of the saids pannalls and assyze, They are to find the said lybell proven against the saids pannells or not, according to law, as they will be answerable to God and a good conscience, And that they draw up the verdict accordingly, bearing what way every assyzer doth vote, and delyver the Samen, being first Subscribed by the Chancellor and Clerk, and Sealled by the hand of ther Chancellor or president, To the saids Commissioners or ther said Quorum, whom they heirby Authorize and Commissionat to advyse the haill proces and verdict of the Inquest, and give and pronounce Sentence condemnator or absolvitor in the said matter according to Justice, and in case the saids persons Shall find the saids pannalls guilty of the crymes laid to ther charge with power to the saids Commissioners or ther said Quorum To decerne and adjudge them to be execute to death, within Such Space and after Such maner as they Shall think fitt; And appoynts the Saids Commissioners ther said quorum or Clerk to transmitt the haill proces that Shall be laid befor them against the saids John Hay, John Browns elder and younger, Angus Fraser, Sophia Murray, Christian Moir, Janet Brown, Katharine and Jannet Rotsons, George Gordon, Isobell Murray and John Anderson, and the Severall Steps therof, and verdict of the In quest to be given therupon, To the saids Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell betwixt and the Twentie fyfth day of June nixt to come, to be considered by them; And discharges the saids Commissioners or ther said Quorum to Sufferr the Sentence which Shall be pronounced by them against the saids pannells to be putt to execution, or to appoynt or affix a day for executeing therof, without Speciall order or warrand had or obtained from the saids Lords of Privie Councell for that effect, And Generallie with power to the Saids Commissioners or ther Said Quorum To Act, doe and performe all and Sundrie other things whatsomever competent and incumbent to be acted, done and performed by any Commissioners of Justiciary hitherto nominat and appoynted by the saids Lords of Privie Councell; And the Saids Lords appoynts the saids Commissioners, or ther said Quorum within the Space of a moneth after pronounceing and executing their Sentence in this matter, To report to the Lords Commissioners of Justiciary, or to the Clerk of the Criminall Court, and authentick extract wnder their hands, off the said proces, Sentence, and the maner of executeing therof, To the effect the Same may be recorded in the books of Justiciary, which the Clerk to the Criminall Court is heirby requyred to record therin, as he will be answerable; Given att Edinburgh the twentie first day of February Jaj vijc and Six years, Sic Subscribitur Sutherland P. Montrose. Buchan. Craufurd, Forfar, Ruglen. Cromartie. Glasgow. James Steuart. Robert Dundas.

At Edinburgh 21 February 1706

A1706/2/141

Commission by the Council

Commission for judging and trying house breakers etc

The lords of her majesty’s privy council being informed that John Hay younger capmaker at Inchyra, John Brown elder a horner, John Brown younger dragoon, Angus Fraser horner, Sophia Murray, Christian Moir, Janet Brown, Katharine Robertson, and Janet Robertson, present prisoners in the tolbooth of Perth, as also that George Gordon, alias Mcwattie sometime Smith, Isobel Murray his spouse, and sister to the said Sophia Murray, and John Anderson alias Soulie prisoners in the tolbooth of Stirling, are alleged guilty of the horrid crimes of murder or manslaughter, robbery, theft, receipt of stolen goods, and other atrocious crimes, and considering [there] will be great charges and expenses [in bringing] the foresaid persons to this place in order to [go to] trial before the lord commissioners of justiciary, besides that several inconveniencies may arise by their transportation; and the said lords likewise considering that the said crimes cannot be judged and tried by any person in the country without a warrant and commission from them for that effect, and the said lords being desirous to have the said matter brought to a trial, that the persons guilty may receive condign punishment, and others may be deterred from committing such crimes in time coming, do therefor give full power, warrant, and commission to […] viscount of Stormount, […] Ramsay, sheriff depute of Parth, […] Bennet, sheriff depute of Stirling, Alexander Robertson. provost of Parth, […] Christie, bailie in Stirling, Sir Patrick Murray of Auchtertyre, and […] Craigie of Dumbarnie, and declare any five of the foresaid persons, commissioners, to be a sufficient quorum, one of the said sheriff deputes being always one; and the said commissioners or there said quorum being always qualified by taking the oath of allegiance and subscribing the same with the assurance before they enter upon the execution of their offices by virtue hereof, to take trial of and to judge and do justice upon the forenamed persons for the said crimes of murder or manslaughter, robbery, theft, receipt of stolen goods, and other crimes above written, and in order thereto to meet and convene at Perth 28 March next to come, and there to accept of this present commission, and upon their acceptance to administer the oath of fidelity to the person whom [Adam Cockburn] the lord justice clerk or James Montgomery of Langshaw, clerk to the justice court as depute to the said lord justice clerk, shall nominate, depute, and substitute to be clerk to this present commission. With power [to] the said commissioners or their said quorum to choose their own clerk (for whom they shall be answerable) in case the said lord justice clerk and James Montgomerie shall refuse to nominate a clerk in this matter, they being first required so to do, with power likewise to the said persons hereby commissioned or their said quorum to create, make, and constitute sergeants, dempsters, and other members of the said court, and to issue out and raise precepts or libels of indictments at the instance of […] procurator fiscal for her majesty’s interest in the said matter against the said John Hay younger, John Brown elder and younger, Angus Fraser, Sophia Murray, Christian Moir, Janet Brown, Katharine and Janet Robertson, George Gordon, Isobel Murray, and John Anderson for the crimes abovementioned; for summoning and citing of them upon fifteen days by delivering to them a full copy of the libel or indictment with the names and designations of the assizers and witnesses subjoined; and for citing the assizers and witnesses in the ordinary manner and under the pains and certifications usual in such cases to appear before the said commissioners hereby commissioned or their said quorum at Perth […]; with power also to them to amerciate and fine the absent assizers and witnesses, and the amercements and fines to uplift for their own use and behove; and to adjourn themselves from time to time till the relevancy be discussed, to the effect that the panels being fully heard, the said commissioners or their said quorum may judge and determine the relevancy of the said libel; and to call an inquest of forty-five persons who are to be cited on the assize of the said panels, and a list of their names and designations given to the said persons accused, with their libels as said is; and after discussing of the relevancy of the said libels, in presence of the said persons of inquest by pronouncing interlocutor thereon, out of that number to choose an assize of fifteen, and to administer to them the ordinary oath in the usual terms; and with power also to the said commissioners or their said quorum to examine the witnesses to be cited in presence of the said panels and sworn inquest upon the points that shall be admitted to probation; and immediately thereafter without any adjournment to remit the said libel and interlocutor to be given by them concerning the relevancy thereof and the depositions of the witnesses to be taken in manner foresaid, to the knowledge of the said assize, who without delay or going out of the court are to be enclosed by themselves and are hereby appointed to remain so enclosed, and none suffered to be with them, or to have access to them, or any of themselves suffered to go out, until they be agreed and conclude their answer, and to elect a chancellor or president with a clerk of their own number, and after reading and perusing of the said indictment, interlocutor to be pronounced thereon, and depositions of the witnesses to be taken in presence of the said panels and assize, they are to find the said libel proven against the said panels or not, according to law, as they will be answerable to God and a good conscience; and that they draw up the verdict accordingly, bearing what way every assizer does vote, and deliver the same, being first subscribed by the chancellor and clerk, and sealed by the hand of their chancellor or president, to the said commissioners or their said quorum, whom they hereby authorise and commission to advise the whole process and verdict of the inquest, and give and pronounce sentence condemnatory or absolvitory in the said matter according to justice; and in case the said persons shall find the said panels guilty of the crimes laid to their charge, with power to the said commissioners or their said quorum to discern and adjudge them to be executed to death, within such space and after such manner as they shall think fit; and appoint the said commissioners their said quorum or clerk to transmit the whole process that shall be laid before them against the said John Hay, John Brown elder and younger, Angus Fraser, Sophia Murray, Christian Moir, Janet Brown, Katharine and Janet Robertson, George Gordon, Isobel Murray, and John Anderson, and the several steps thereof, and verdict of the inquest to be given thereupon, to the said lords of her majesty’s privy council between [now] and 25 June next to come, to be considered by them; and discharge the said commissioners or their said quorum to suffer the sentence which shall be pronounced by them against the said panels to be put to execution, or to appoint or affix a day for executing thereof, without special order or warrant had or obtained from the said lords of privy council for that effect; and generally with power to the said commissioners or their said quorum to act, do, and perform all and sundry other things whatsoever competent and incumbent to be acted, done, and performed by any commissioners of justiciary hitherto nominated and appointed by the said lords of privy council. And the said lords appoint the said commissioners, or their said quorum, within the space of a month after pronouncing and executing their sentence in this matter, to report to the lord commissioners of justiciary, or to the clerk of the criminal court, an authentic extract under their hands of the said process, sentence, and the manner of executing thereof, to the effect the same may be recorded in the books of justiciary, which the clerk to the criminal court is hereby required to record therein, as he will be answerable. Given at Edinburgh 21 February 1706. Sic Subscribitur Sutherland preses; Montrose; Buchan; Crawford; Forfar; Ruglen; Cromartie; Glasgow; James Stewart; Robert Dundas.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 447-9.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 447-9.

Procedure: committee report, 21 February 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Twentie first day of February Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/2/131

Procedure: committee report

Report of the Committie anent Church irregularities and greivances

Anent a representation given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell By the Commissioners of the Late Generall Assemblie of the Church of Scotland In name and by warrand of the said Generall Assemblie, Shewing that they had great reason to bless and thank ther gracious God, As they doe alewayes for Restitution and re-establishment of this Church, and for the many good laws made in that behalfe, And more especiallie for her Majesties Gracious countenance and protection, And the saids Lords ther most favourable assistance, wherby these blessing have been hitherto preserved and made effectuall to them, They needed not putt their lordships in mynd of the difficulties both ther lordships and this Church, and its Severall Commissions have mett with in getting Some good order Setled in the northerne and highland pairts of this kingdome; Nor did they intend to reflect upon Some late occurrances, which might have increased these difficulties, But haveing all assureance of her Majesties gracious favour and protection, And of their lordships good assistance, They wer therby encouraged to lay befor them their present greivances, wherof they wer perswaded the remedy, which is in ther lordships hands and power, will no less conduce to the peace and Security of the countrie, then to the true advancement of the work of the Gospell In promoveing true knowledge and pietie: The Greivances they then humbly complean of for ther lordships help and redress are /imo/ The many Intrusions that are in these pairts as /1o/ att Frasersburgh by one Mr Alexander Muir who was never a Minister of this Church in any forme whatsoever 2o/ att Auchterless by Mr Alexander Barclay depryved by the Councell for not praying and nottour disaffection, 3o/ att Ruthven By Mr John Hay depryved by the Councell for the Same causes, 4o/ att the Church of Raine by Mr Patrick Challmers who continues to intrude tho not only deprived by the Councell, but lykewayes discharged and denuonced for his intrustion /5o/ att the Colledge kirk of old Aberdeen by Mr David Nedderweek depryved by the Councell /6o/ att the Trinitie Church or2 Chappell in the new town of Aberdeen by Mr Andrew Burnet tho Standing discharged by act of parliament to preach in Aberdeen; All these being within the bounds of the Synode of Aberdeen, they had Sent a particular representation of them from ther Synod to be laid befor ther lordships. Their Second greivance was that wher Churches wer vaccant by death or otherwayes, the keyes are frequently abstracted by persons disaffected, and access refused to thwse sent by the presbetrie And they farther treated for essaying to preach even in the Church yeard, Ther lordships have indeed given warrand by ther act to charge the havers, but they use Such Shiftins that even tho the act of parleament 1698. hath laid Shirreffs wnder a penaltie if they give not due assistance, yet the presbetries are frustrat; And therfor It was hoped that wher application Should be made to ther lordships by presbetries, They would ordaine the Shirreffs or other Judges ordinary of the bounds, Summarly to make Churches patent as they will be answerable, And that Letters be direct for that effect, which will be more effectuall then the ordinary methode of proces, which tends principally to the inflicting of a fyne, off which they wer nowayes desyreous. Ther 3d Greivance is that the late Bishops tho exauctorat in this Church and prelacie abolished, yet take wpon to give licences to men to preach And that these men are also frequently imployed to preach by Episcopall Incumbents in ther kirks and meeting houses, as particularly Mr George Hay and Mr Robert Jamieson; which practise both of Licenceing and preaching out the said Licence, being So manifastly disorderly and contrary to law; They humbly Craved that it may be discharged in Such maner as their lordships Should Judge most convenient and effectuall, that Schisme and disorder might not be perpetuat /4o/ That wher intruders are removed from any Church or parish, wherin they had intruded, and the Sentence be given against them by the saids Lords for ther Said Intrusion, Yet these Intruders doe in a maner elide the Same either by removing only to the border of another neighbouring parish, and ther continueing to exerce the Ministeriall function to the keeping up of the disorders as formerly, or otherwayes by removing into some other parish wher they again intrude, and Sett wp as freely as if no Sentence of Intrusion had been past against them, For which they humbly conceaved that these Intruders once found guilty of intrudeing into a parish, Should not only be removed from the Same and discharged to exerce any pairt of the Ministeriall function within the bounds therof, But also discharged to intrude any wher els in any Church or parish whatsomever, wnder Such certifications as the saids Lords in ther wisdome Should think fitt, 5o/ Ther are great disorders through Intruding and wnlawfull meteing houses within the bounds of the presbeterie of Meigle, For in the parish of Newtyle, Mr Alexander Mckenzie late Episcopall Incumbent depryved by the Privie Councell, keeps a meeting house, and being Chamberlane to the Lord Prestonhall in that parish, hath Such Influence upon the people that the legall and regular Minister is much deserted and discouradged, Item in the parish of Essie and Nevoy Mr Sylvester Lambie late Episcopall Incumbent depryved by the Privie Councell, Keeps a meeting house to the great discouragment of the regular Minister, And so in the parish of Meigle Mr James Crocket in the Same circumstances with the two former, keeps a meeting house, and he being also a chamberlane to Some heretors in the parish, proves a great hinderance and discouragment to the regular Minister, and thus in Kingoldruime parish Mr George Kineir never admitted a Minister in any place, yet keeps a throng meeting house, and occasions great disorders /6o/ The Church of Fetteresso tho Lawfully planted by the presbetrie, yet is Shutt against the Minister ther placed, and one Mr Guthrie ane Intruder mantained against him, wherupon ther is a proces depending befor ther lordships, And in the presbetrie of Breichine ther are many and great Intrusions, as in the Town of Montrose by Mr William Dumbar, and in the parish of Carastoun by Mr Alexander Lindsay both Episcopall Incumbents formerly depryved by the Lords of Privie Councell, Breichine and Aberlemno are also intruded wpon by Master Skinner and Mr Ochterlounie, wher they continue notwithstanding of former Complaints against them And the parish of Edzell hath been almost these four years Intruded wpon by Mr Robert Lindsay ane Episcopall preacher, and ordained as is Supposed by one or other of the Bishops Since they wer exauctorat /7o/ The outragious and barbarous ryot that happened att Dingwall by the Insolent opposition of the rable Against Mr William Steuart Sent ther by the presbetrie to preach, with the Shirreffs Strange procedure against Sir Rot Monro of Fowlls and his people of the parish of Killearny that wait only ther to Dingwall to hear ther Minister and helped to rescue him by a Small assistance from the Saids rablers, was fully laid befor the Councell in a proces raised in Apryll Jaj vijc and four Against the Saids Rablers and also against the Shirreff, In which proces the rablers being all absent, Certification was admitted against them, And any further proceeding against the Shirreff delayed till June therafter And in the mean tyme the saids Lords Recommended to the Said Shirreff to give the presbetrie all assistance and protection in Supplying the vaccancie and planting of the Church of Dingwall, But this Greivance is yet so litle remeaded, that tho the Shirreff Inchculter hath indeed given up the bonds he took from Sir Rot Monro and his people, yet the Town of Dingwall continues Still Stubborne and insolent against the Presbetrie refuseing them all access there, In sofarr as when the brethren intended a visitatioun, they wer advertised to forbear, because the rable was resolved and prepared to oppose them with all violence, and when since that tyme, and wpon sound hopes given this heat and fury might be abated, they sent a Minister to preach ther, he was resisted with the greatest insolence and violence and with much adoe escaped ther hands, And this wnaccountable practise att Dingwall hes been so contagious that severall parishes within the United presbetries of Ross and Sutherland who used formerly to give all due complyance to Church orders and the Ministers, Have now of late refused and resisted as Dingwall hath done; So that this case deserves in a Speciall maner the Lords of Councell that consideration, It being evident that if this disorder be not duty noticed and restrained, It will grow to a greater hight; And therfor the Laird of Assint printed Shirreff being now dead, It was most humbly craved, that it would please the Lords of Councell by themselves and the Shirreff to be named to that vaccancie, So to interpose that peace and good order may be established in these bounds, and the Presbetries duly protected and secured. 8o/ Ther is one Mr George Strachan Son to Sir James Strahan of Thornetoun a persone Nottourly disorderly and disaffected, who keept a Schooll at Huntly, but declyned to Subject himselfe to the presbetrie, and this man with another John Malcolme a profest papist, are Supported by the papists of the bounds, and doe by themselves educat youth rather in the popish then protestant Religion, And tho the presbetrie did depose the said Mr George from being Schoollmaster, yet he pretending to be Diaconat by the late Bishope of Murray Setts up a meeting house within the parish of Keith, and being by Sentence of the Lords of Privie Councell, discharged in January last to preach in that parish, yet he did exerce the Ministeriall function in the borders of that and other parishes Sometymes in the fields and Sometymes in houses, and had gott Such a following of louse and dissolute persons, wherof severalls are papists that they espouse his quarrell to that hight as to insult allmost the wholl Ministers of the presbetrie, attacking Some of them with guns and pistolls as they ryde out the high way, and invadeing others of them in ther houses with swords and other weapons, declairing openly that they practise these violences on Mr Strachans account. /9o/ Mr Robert Caddell a man well knowen for his nottour disaffection to the Government, And for the troubles and disorders he hath occasioned in severall pairts, doth now sett up at Elgine with one Mr John Steuart, who was never a Minister but hath lately obtained Licence from the exauctorat Bishops, And ther they keep ther meetings openly to the great discouragment of the regular Ministers of the place, and also to the keeping up the disorders, heats and contests, wherwith the Town of Elgine hes been long infested, And now the Said Mr Rot Calder and one Mr Alexander Gaderer hes Sett up a meeting house in the parish of Keith. Ther is also one Mr William Fallconer depryved Some years agoe by the Councell who hes lately Sett up a meeting house att Forres, And is Supported and mantained in it by men nottourly disaffected, And even Such as by ther office as Magistrats are obleidged to restraine and discourage Such disorders. These disorders and Greivances are with all Submission laid befor the saids Lords that they may be more perfectly informed of the condition of these pairts, and that ther lordships may find out Such remedies for these evills, and for preventing the worse consequences therof that in ther wisdome they Should think fitt, It would certainly be a great advantage both to peace and good order that inferior Magistrats als well to burgh as landward, especiallie to Brughs would concerne themselves more, to prevent and Suppress abuses and principally to countenance the present Church establishment by ther good example in keeping the Church and forbearing to countenance wnlawfull conventicles, But this with what els the saids Lords may Judge proper Is again recommended to ther lordships wisdome and Justice, only this is So much the more needfull that if the Inferior Magistrats wer more observant of the laws, and of ther lordships sentences, one great abuse and mischeife that vexes most places, might easily have been prevented, and that is that when the saids Lords removes ane Intruder, no other of his Sending or hunding out, Should be allowed to Sett up in his place, But in effect the meeting house from which the Intruder is removed, Should be Shutt up and all others hindered to intrude in his rowme, for otherwayes the represeaters may regrate it to the saids Lords that ther Sentences are manifastly elided, For thus when lately att St Andrews Mr Richard Waddell was removed, yet imediatly ther was others as disaffected and more disorderly Sett up in his place, and with So much the worse consequence that these men are not knowen, but come up and preach, and then withdraw, and are not to be found, And thus it also happened at Mussellburgh wher Mr Alexander Heriot a Minister deposed was removed, Yet Still one or other was brought from Edinburgh or Some other pairt to keep wp the meeting house and Schisme, and thus also it happened att St Ninians Dundee, Elgine, Meegle, and other places, wherof the proper and necessary remedy appears to be, That wher ane Intruder Is removed, the saids Lords Should att the Same tyme give orders to the Magistrats of the bounds as yow att Tranent and Dalkeith to Shutt up the meeting houses and to be carefull that no intruder be allowed to Sett wp within the parish whence the former was removed, Subscribit at the appoyntment of the Commission of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland by Sic Subscribitur William Carstairs. Which Representation abovewrytten being read in presence of and considered by the saids Lords of Privie They Recommended the Samen to a Committee of ther own number to consider therof and report ther oppinion to the Councell theranent, And upon the eight day of February instant the said Committie appoynted by the Lords of Privie Councell for considering the representation of Church Greivances Sederunt The Earle of Glasgow, Her Majesties Advocat and Mr Francis Montgomrie Who haveing proceeded to consider the said representation Exhibite to the Lords of Privie Councell by the Commission of the late Generall Assemblie, And haveing heard the Saids Greivances read over one by one in ther presence, As to the first (which they recommend to be fully read in Councell) It is ther oppoinion as to the persons therin Compleaned on that Such of them as are under proces already befor the Councell be insisted against by the Agent for the Kirk, And that Such as have not yet been process’d, Sumonds be raised Against them befor the Councell at the instance of the said Agent; As to the Second The Committie are of oppinion, that Seeing the Shutting up of Kirks and carrieing away the keyes, and withholding them from the presbetrie Is so great ane abuse, and hath been so long compleaned off, That therfor a Generall Act and Proclamation Should be made Commanding all Shirreffs and ther deputs, and other Magistrats and officiars of the law, That wpon application of the presbetrie of the bounds, They make Such Churches as are Shutt wp Against the Presbitries and the keyes abstracted and with held, patent; upon application of the presbetrie to be made to them for that effect, with certification that if they refuse to doe the Same within the Space of […] dayes after the said application made to them, Letters Shall be direct Summarly against the refusers by the authority of Councell, and att the instance of the Kirk agent for chargeing them therto Simpliciter, And that the Saids Letters Should be ordered by the Councell upon the forsaid application in tyme comeing, And that by and attour the pains contained in the Act of parliament 1698. Against Shirreffs and others refuseing, As to the third Greivance, which is etc. The Committie are of oppinion that the Same is a great abuse and a manifast contempt of the law, and present Church establishment, and that therfor the Same Should be prohibite, or at Least Intimation Should be made that whoever presumes to preach, or exerce any pairt of the Ministeriall function without being duly authorised and qualified according to law, May not only be Summarly Seased and Secured by the Magistrat of the bounds, but also Shall be banished furth of the kingdome Conforme to the act of parliament 1693. As to the fourth Greivance, which is etc. It is the oppinion of the Committie that the abuse therin complained wpon Should be trasined, And that a publict Intimation Should also be made against all Such who being either depryved by the Councell, or not qualified according to law, And have been or Shall be removed from any Church or parish as Intruders by any legall Sentence, that if they be found again transgressing, and intrudeing into any other Kirk or parish, they may not only be Summarly Seased and Secured by the Magistrats of the bounds, but also after due conviction, Shall be banished the Kingdome Conforme to the sad act of parliament 1693. And the Act of parliament 1695. And farder the Committie are of oppinion that these three last articles may be contained in ane publict act of Councell to be published by way of proclamation for the better preventing the abuses therin compleaned on; As to the fyfth Greivance, which is etc. The Committie are of oppinion that Such of the saids Intruders, and wnlawfull meeting house-keepers as are therin mentioned, if already wnder proces, Should be insisted against, And if not wnder proces, proces Should be direct against them, as is provyded in answer to the first article And this is also ther oppinion as to the 6th article which is etc. Except as to the Church of Fetteresso, which is already laid befor the Councell; As to the Sevinth Greivance, which is etc. The Committie are of oppinion that the Shirreffship of Ross being now vaccant a Commission Should be granted by the Councell to Sir Robert Monro of Fowlls to be Shirreff of that Shyre, Untill her Majestie think fitt to provyde otherwayes, And that it Should be recommended to him to give the presbetrie due protection, And to Suppress all rables, and tumults that may be moved against them in the exercise of ther duty. As the eight greivance which is etc. The Comittie are of oppinion that the Shirreff of the bounds Should be ordered to Suppress the meeting house compleaned of therin, as he will be answerable. As to the nynth Greivance, which is etc. The Committie are of oppinion that the meeting house at Elgine that hath been so long abused, and often compleaned of, Should be Shutt up conforme to a report formerly made by a Committie of the Councell, and also approven by the Councell but not yet Signed; The forsaid Comittie haveing also considered the petition of the Commission of the late Generall assemblie exhibite to the Lords of Councell for restraining the profanation of the Lords day, and putting the laws and acts of parliament in execution for the due observance therof, are of opinion that the Lords of Councell after reading of the said petition Should order such a proclamation to be emitted, as may best attaine the ends proposed in the said petition: The Cause caice3 of the parish of Inveresk was also before the Committie, and they are of oppinion that Since Mr Alexander Heriot who had troubled that parish Is both depryved by the Councell, And that ther wer former orders of Councell for Shutting up all meeting houses with that parish, The Baillie of the Regalitie, and Magistrats of Mussellburgh Should be requyred and charged to make the place ride of him, and of all that he imployes wnder him, as they will be answerable, Sic Subscribitur James Stewart. The within report of the Comittie appoynted for considering the representation given in by the Commission of the Generall Assemblie anent the Church irregularities and grivances being read in presence of the Lords of her Majesties Privie Counsell, The Samen was voted and approven, and appoynted to be recorded, and recommended to the former Committie to prepare a proclamation in the termes therof, and bring into the Councell with ther conveniencie Sic Subscribitur Sutherland I.p.d.

At Edinburgh 21 February 1706

A1706/2/131

Procedure: committee report

Report of the committee concerning Church irregularities and grievances

Concerning a representation given in and presented to the lords of her majesty’s privy council by the commissioners of the late general assembly of the Church of Scotland in name and by warrant of the said general assembly, showing that they had great reason to bless and thank their gracious God, as they do always for restitution and re-establishment of this Church, and for the many good laws made in that behalf, and more especially for her majesty’s gracious countenance and protection, and the said lords their most favourable assistance, whereby these blessings have been hitherto preserved and made effectual to them. They needed not put their lordships in mind of the difficulties both their lordships and this Church and its several commissions have met with in getting some good order settled in the northern and highland parts of this kingdom; nor did they intend to reflect upon some late occurrences, which might have increased these difficulties, but having all assurance of her majesty’s gracious favour and protection, and of their lordships’ good assistance, they were thereby encouraged to lay before them their present grievances, whereof they were persuaded the remedy, which is in their lordships’ hands and power, will no less conduce to the peace and security of the country, than to the true advancement of the work of the gospel in promoting true knowledge and piety. The grievances they then humbly complain of for their lordships’ help and redress are firstly the many intrusions that are in these parts as 1st at Fraserburgh by one Mr Alexander Muir, who was never a minister of this Church in any form whatsoever, 2nd at Auchterless by Mr Alexander Barclay, deprived by the council for not praying and notorious disaffection, 3rd at Ruthven by Mr John Hay, deprived by the council for the same causes, 4th at the church of Rayne by Mr Patrick Chalmers, who continues to intrude though not only deprived by the council, but likewise discharged and denounced for his intrusion, 5th at the college kirk of Old Aberdeen by Mr David Nedderweek, deprived by the council, 6th at the trinity church or chapel in the new town of Aberdeen by Mr Andrew Burnet, though standing discharged by act of parliament to preach in Aberdeen. All these being within the bounds of the synod of Aberdeen, they had sent a particular representation of them from their synod to be laid before their lordships. Their Second grievance was that where churches were vacant by death or otherwise, the keys are frequently abstracted by persons disaffected, and access refused to those sent by the presbytery, and they further treated for essaying to preach even in the church yard. Their lordships have indeed given warrant by their act to charge the havers, but they use such shiftiness that even though the act of parliament [of] 1698 has laid sheriffs under a penalty if they give not due assistance, yet the presbyteries are frustrated, and therefore it was hoped that where application should be made to their lordships by presbyteries, they would ordain the sheriffs or other judges ordinary of the bounds, summarily to make churches patent as they will be answerable, and that letters be directed for that effect, which will be more effectual than the ordinary method of process, which tends principally to the inflicting of a fine, of which they were not desirous. Their third grievance is that the late bishops, though removed [from] this Church and prelacy abolished, yet take upon [themselves] to give licences to men to preach, and that these men are also frequently employed to preach by episcopl incumbents in their kirks and meeting houses, as particularly Mr George Hay and Mr Robert Jamieson, which practice both of licensing and preaching out the said licence, being so manifestly disorderly and contrary to law, they humbly craved that it may be discharged in such manner as their lordships should judge most convenient and effectual, that schism and disorder might not be perpetuated. Fourthly, that where intruders are removed from any church or parish, wherein they had intruded, and the sentence be given against them by the said lords for their said intrusion, yet these intruders do in a manner elide the same either by removing only to the border of another neighbouring parish, and there continuing to exercise the ministerial function to the keeping up of the disorders as formerly, or otherwise by removing into some other parish where they again intrude, and set up as freely as if no sentence of intrusion had been passed against them, for which they humbly conceived that these intruders once found guilty of intruding into a parish, should not only be removed from the same and discharged to exercise any part of the ministerial function within the bounds thereof, but also discharged to intrude anywhere else in any church or parish whatsoever, under such certifications as the said lords in their wisdom should think fit. Fifthly, there are great disorders through intruding and unlawful meeting houses within the bounds of the presbytery of Meigle, for in the parish of Newtyle, Mr Alexander Mckenzie, late episcopal incumbent deprived by the privy council, keeps a meeting house, and being chamberlain to the Lord Prestonhall in that parish, has such influence upon the people that the legal and regular minister is much deserted and discouraged. Item in the parish of Essie and Nevay Mr Sylvester Lambie, late episcopal incumbent deprived by the privy council, keeps a meeting house to the great discouragement of the regular minister, and so in the parish of Meigle Mr James Crocket in the same circumstances with the two former, keeps a meeting house, and he being also a chamberlain to some heritors in the parish, proves a great hinderance and discouragement to the regular minister, and thus in Kingoldrum parish Mr George Kinnear, never admitted a minister in any place, yet keeps a throng meeting house, and occasions great disorders. Sixthly the church of Fetteresso, though lawfully planted by the presbytery, yet is shut against the minister there placed, and one Mr Guthrie, an intruder maintained against him, whereupon there is a process depending before their lordships, and in the presbytery of Brechin there are many and great intrusions, as in the town of Montrose by Mr William Dunbar, and in the parish of Careston by Mr Alexander Lindsay, both episcopal incumbents formerly deprived by the lords of privy council, Brechin and Aberlemno are also intruded upon by Master Skinner and Mr Ochterlounie, where they continue notwithstanding of former complaints against them. And the parish of Edzell has been almost these four years intruded upon by Mr Robert Lindsay, an episcopal preacher, and ordained as is supposed by one or other of the bishops since they were ejected. Seventhly the outrageous and barbarous riot that happened at Dingwall by the insolent opposition of the rabble against Mr William Stewart, sent there by the presbytery to preach, with the sheriff’s strange procedure against Sir Robert Munro of Foulis and his people of the parish of Killearnan that went only there to Dingwall to hear their minister and helped to rescue him by a small assistance from the said rabblers, was fully laid before the council in a process raised in April 1704 against the said rabblers and also against the sheriff, in which process the rabblers being all absent, certification was admitted against them, and any further proceeding against the sheriff delayed till June thereafter, and in the meantime the said lords recommended to the said sheriff to give the presbytery all assistance and protection in supplying the vacany and planting of the church of Dingwall, but this grievance is yet so little remedied, that though the sheriff Inchculter has indeed given up the bonds he took from Sir Robert Munro and his people, yet the town of Dingwall continues still stubborn and insolent against the presbytery, refusing them all access there, insofar as when the brethren intended a visitation, they were advertised to forbear, because the rabble was resolved and prepared to oppose them with all violence, and when since that time, and upon sound hopes given [that] this heat and fury might be abated, they sent a minister to preach there, he was resisted with the greatest insolence and violence and with much ado escaped their hands, and this unaccountable practice at Dingwall has been so contagious that several parishes within the united presbyteries of Ross and Sutherland who used formerly to give all due compliance to Church orders and the ministers, have now of late refused and resisted as Dingwall has done; so that this case deserves in a special manner the lords of council their consideration, it being evident that if this disorder be not duly noticed and restrained, it will grow to a greater height. And therefor the laird of Assynt, printed sheriff being now dead, it was most humbly craved, that it would please the lords of council by themselves and the sheriff to be named to that vacancy so to interpose that peace and good order may be established in these bounds, and the presbyteries duly protected and secured. Eighthly, there is one Mr George Strachan, son to Sir James Strahan of Thornton, a person notoriously disorderly and disaffected, who kept a school at Huntly, but declined to subject himself to the presbytery, and this man with another, John Malcolm, a professed papist, are supported by the papists of the bounds, and do by themselves educate youth rather in the popish then Protestant religion, and though the presbytery did depose the said Mr George from being schoolmaster, yet he pretending to be [appointed] by the late Bishop of Murray sets up a meeting house within the parish of Keith, and being by sentence of the lords of privy council, discharged in January last to preach in that parish, yet he did exercise the ministerial function in the borders of that and other parishes, sometimes in the fields and sometimes in houses, and had got such a following of loose and dissolute persons, whereof several are papists, that they espouse his quarrel to that height as to insult almost the whole ministers of the presbytery, attacking some of them with guns and pistols as they ride out the highway, and invading others of them in their houses with swords and other weapons, declaring openly that they practise these violences on Mr Strachan’s account. Ninthly, Mr Robert Caddell, a man well known for his notorious disaffection to the government, and for the troubles and disorders he has occasioned in several parts, does now set up at Elgin with one Mr John Stewart, who was never a minister but has lately obtained licence from the ejected bishops, and there they keep their meetings openly to the great discouragement of the regular ministers of the place, and also to the keeping up the disorders, heats, and contests, wherewith the town of Elgin has been long infested, and now the said Mr Robert Calder and one Mr Alexander Gaderer have set up a meeting house in the parish of Keith. There is also one Mr William Falconer, deprived some years ago by the council, who has lately set up a meeting house at Forres, and is supported and maintained in it by men notoriously disaffected, and even such as by their office as magistrates are obliged to restrain and discourage such disorders. These disorders and grievances are with all submission laid before the said lords that they may be more perfectly informed of the condition of these parts, and that their lordships may find out such remedies for these evils, and for preventing the worse consequences thereof, that in their wisdom they should think fit. It would certainly be a great advantage both to peace and good order that inferior magistrates, as well to burgh as landward, especially to burghs, would concern themselves more to prevent and suppress abuses and principally to countenance the present Church establishment by their good example in keeping the church and forbearing to countenance unlawful conventicles. But this with what else the said lords may judge proper is again recommended to their lordships’ wisdom and justice, only this is so much the more needful that if the inferior magistrates were more observant of the laws, and of their lordships’ sentences, one great abuse and mischief that vexes most places, might easily have been prevented, and that is that when the said lords remove an intruder, no other of his sending or hounding out should be allowed to set up in his place, but in effect the meeting house from which the intruder is removed should be shut up and all others hindered to intrude in his place, for otherwise the representers may regret it to the said lords that their sentences are manifestly elided, for thus when lately at St Andrews Mr Richard Waddell was removed, yet immediately there were others as disaffected and more disorderly set up in his place, and with so much the worse consequence that these men are not known, but come up and preach, and then withdraw, and are not to be found. And thus it also happened at Musselburgh, where Mr Alexander Heriot, a minister deposed, was removed, yet still one or other was brought from Edinburgh or some other part to keep up the meeting house and schism. And thus also it happened at St Ninians, Dundee, Elgin, Meigle, and other places, whereof the proper and necessary remedy appears to be, that where an intruder is removed, the said lords should at the same time give orders to the magistrates of the bounds as you [did] at Tranent and Dalkeith to shut up the meeting houses and to be careful that no intruder be allowed to set up within the parish whence the former was removed, subscribed at the appointment of the commission of the general assembly of the Church of Scotland by Sic Subscribitur William Carstairs. Which representation above written being read in presence of and considered by the said lords of privy [council] they recommended the same to a committee of their own number to consider thereof and report their opinion to the council therein, and upon 8 February instant the said committee appointed by the lords of privy council for considering the representation of Church grievances, sederunt [David Boyle] the earl of Glasgow, [Sir James Stewart of Goodtrees] her majesty’s advocate, and Mr Francis Montgomerie, who having proceeded to consider the said representation exhibited to the lords of privy council by the commission of the late general assembly, and having heard the said grievances read over one by one in their presence, as to the first (which they recommend to be fully read in council) it is their opinion as to the persons therein complained on that such of them as are under process already before the council be insisted against by the agent for the Kirk, and that such as have not yet been processed, summons be raised against them before the council at the instance of the said agent. As to the second, the committee are of opinion that seeing the shutting up of kirks and carrying away the keys, and withholding them from the presbytery, is so great an abuse, and has been so long complained of, that therefor a general act and proclamation should be made commanding all sheriffs and their deputes, and other magistrates and officers of the law, that upon application of the presbytery of the bounds, they make such churches as are shut up against the presbyteries and the keys abstracted and withheld, patent, upon application of the presbytery to be made to them for that effect, with certification that if they refuse to do the same within the space of […] days after the said application made to them, letters shall be directed summarily against the refusers by the authority of council, and at the instance of the Kirk agent for charging them thereto simpliciter. And that the said letters should be ordered by the council upon the foresaid application in time coming, and that in addition to the pains contained in the act of parliament [of] 1698 against sheriffs and others refusing. As to the third grievance, which is etc., the committee are of opinion that the same is a great abuse and a manifest contempt of the law, and present Church establishment, and that therefor the same should be prohibited, or at least intimation should be made that whoever presumes to preach, or exercise any part of the ministerial function without being duly authorised and qualified according to law, may not only be summarily seized and secured by the magistrate of the bounds, but also shall be banished forth of the kingdom, conform to the act of parliament [of] 1693. As to the fourth grievance, which is etc., it is the opinion of the committee that the abuse therein complained upon should be [regarded as treason], and that a public intimation should also be made against all such who being either deprived by the council, or not qualified according to law, and have been or shall be removed from any church or parish as intruders by any legal sentence, that if they be found again transgressing, and intruding into any other kirk or parish, they may not only be summarily seized and secured by the magistrates of the bounds, but also after due conviction, shall be banished the kingdom conform to the sad act of parliament [of] 1693 and the act of parliament [of] 1695. And further the committee are of opinion that these three last articles may be contained in a public act of council to be published by way of proclamation for the better preventing the abuses therein complained on. As to the fifth grievance, which is etc., the committee are of opinion that such of the said intruders, and unlawful meeting house-keepers as are therein mentioned, if already under process, should be insisted against, and if not under process, process should be directed against them, as is provided in answer to the first article. And this is also their opinion as to the sixth article which is etc., except as to the church of Fetteresso, which is already laid before the council. As to the seventh grievance, which is etc., the committee are of opinion that the sheriffship of Ross being now vacant, a commission should be granted by the council to Sir Robert Munro of Foulis to be sheriff of that shire, until her majesty think fit to provide otherwise, and that it should be recommended to him to give the presbytery due protection, and to suppress all rabbles and tumults that may be moved against them in the exercise of their duty. As the eight grievance which is etc., the committee are of opinion that the sheriff of the bounds should be ordered to suppress the meeting house complained of therein, as he will be answerable. As to the ninth grievance, which is etc., the committee are of opinion that the meeting house at Elgin that has been so long abused, and often complained of, should be shut up conform to a report formerly made by a committee of the council, and also approved by the council but not yet signed. The foresaid committee having also considered the petition of the commission of the late general assembly exhibited to the lords of council for restraining the profaning of the lord’s day, and putting the laws and acts of parliament in execution for the due observance thereof, are of opinion that the lords of council, after reading of the said petition, should order such a proclamation to be emitted, as may best attain the ends proposed in the said petition. The case of the parish of Inveresk was also before the committee, and they are of opinion that since Mr Alexander Heriot, who had troubled that parish, is both deprived by the council, and that there were former orders of council for shutting up all meeting houses within that parish, the bailie of the regality and magistrates of Musselburgh should be required and charged to make the place rid of him, and of all that he employs under him, as they will be answerable, Sic Subscribitur James Stewart. The within report of the committee appointed for considering the representation given in by the commission of the general assembly concerning the Church irregularities and grievances being read in presence of the lords of her majesty’s privy council, the same was voted and approved, and appointed to be recorded, and recommended to the former committee to prepare a proclamation in the terms thereof, and bring into the council with their conveniency Sic Subscribitur Sutherland I.p.d.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 443-7.

2. The word ‘Hospitall’ scored out here.

3. Insertion.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 443-7.

Procedure, 21 February 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Twentie first day of February Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/2/121

Procedure

Refused petition for Mr John Mathers

Anent the petition given in and presented to the Lords of her Majesties privie Councell by Mr John Mathers Minister of the Gospell Shewing that wher the petitioner haveing been cited to compear befor the saids Lords the fyfteinth of November past, He did in obedience therto attend severall Subsequent Councell dayes without being called, and haveing not only given very early prooffs of his affection and Loyaltie to her Majesties Royall persone and Government by congratulating her happie accession to the Throne; and constantly praying for her ever since, But hes also altho not obleidged by law, taken the oath of alleadgance and subscribed the assureance, as the saids Lords ther records will testifie, He thought himselfe heirby Sufficiently intituled to the saids Lords ther protection in the exercise of his Ministrie; Conforme to her Majesties most gratious Letter, all which being well knowen to the persewers they thought fitt to pass from your petitioner, and delate his name out of the lybell, So that he rested every way secure, And beleived ther was no need of compearance when the lybell was Called Notwithstanding wherof the petitioner was very much Surpryzed to find that the persewers takeing occasion of calling some others, not being legally qualified, have procured the saids Lords ther order for Shutting wp the petitioners meeting house, which Sentence being only Levelled against the Petitioner, And being pronounced parte inaudita, He humbly craves leave to represent, Primo that the petitioner was the only persone who was Setled in that meeting house since Doctor Weddalls removeing, And the other Ministers who preached ther, did it only transiently at the Petitioners Desyde, And wer no otherwayes concerned, nor had they any fixed residence in that place Secundo, The Acts of parliament lybelled wpon doe nowayes meet the petitioners case, For the act 1693. Ordained the oath of alleadgance and assureance to be taken by all in publict trust Ecclesiastick, Civill or military, and is only to be understood of Ministers who possess Churches and benefices, But ex Super abundante the petitioner is legally qualified, as is abovementioned; and it is evident that the act 1695 is only framed against such as Should intrude themselves into Churches and benefices without a Call prescrybed by law, which the petitioner had never presumed to doe, but contented himselfe to preach in by law, which the petitioner had never presumed to doe, but contented himselfe to preach in a meeting house to Such as wer inclyned that way, And tho this proces was raised at the instigation of the Minister at St Andrews, yet it is most certaine that the meeting house is in the parish of St Leonards, and ther is no Complaint of intrusion from that Minister Thirdly Ther Seems no reasone to quarrell the meeting house, Because it is keept in the Seat of the University; For it is most certaine that many Gentlemen and others in that place, are so averse from the present establishment, that they will neather hear the presbiterian Ministers themselves, nor Sufferr ther children to goe to ther Churches, And its hoped the most zealous of that perswasion will not deney that these whose inclinations are so disposed, Should rather goe to a meeting house, then be Suffered to Spend the Lords day idly, which in a short tyme could wndoubtedly efface all thoughts and concerne for religion, And the petitioner might appeall to the Masters of that Universities, if any of ther Schoollers who frequent the meeting house have been deficient in any pairt of ther duty, and have not been rather eminent examples both of virtue and good manners, and ther is no fear of the receiving any ill impression ther, For the petitioner takes care to preach nothing but the pure doctrine of Christianitie without giveing the least ground of offence to the Government either civill or Ecclesiastick, and is knowen to be of a harmeless lyfe and conversation, and therfor Craveing In regaird of all which and particularly that the petitioner is qualified according to law, and that he was not called when the meeting house was Shutt up, tho the Sentence militats directly against him, That ther lordships would allow him to returne to the exercise of his Ministrie In the meeting house att St Andrews, And grant him that protection her Majestie recomends to ther care in her most Gracious letter, As the said petition bears, The Lords of her Majesties Privie Councell haveing upon the threttie first day of January last Considered the above petition given in to them by Mr John Mathers, And the Samen being Read in ther presence, The Saids Lords delayes the Same till the nixt Councell day, And in the mean tyme Appoynts Sir James Steuart her Majesties Advocat and John Blair Agent for the Kirk to See and answer the Samen, And accordingly her Majesties Advocat gave in the following answers by way of representation Viz The Said Mr John Mathers had offerred Such a petition to the saids Lords against their Sentence for Shutting wp the meeting house at St Andrews, As hath not appeared Since the Revolution, The Saids Lords ordained that meeting house to be Shutt up on the account that after Doctor Waddell was therfrom removed, other persons not qualified, but manifastly disaffected to the Government had keept up the Samen To the great disturbance of the quyet and peace of the place; Mr Mathers2 now3 appears by his petition and affirms that it was his meeting house, but by what pleadable right is hitherto unknowen /2o/ He affirms that by the act of parliament 1693. No Minister not qualified is debarred from preaching but Such as possess Churches and benefices, wheras the Act expressly Statuts that Such who offerr to preach not being qualified in the terms therof, And not haveing Churches and benefices Should be banished the realme or otherwayes punished, /3o/ He affirms that the Act 1695. Against Intruders Is only against Such as Intrude into Churches and benefices, wheras the act is expressly against any who Shall exerce any pairt of the Ministeriall function in any Church or perish not being therto Law fully Called and ordained, 4o/ He avows that the other Ministers who preached ther in that meeting house, tho they wer not qualified, yet did preach ther at his desyre, /5o/ He pretends the Interest of the University, wheras its manifast that nothing cane be more prejudiciall to the said University, and the right education of youth therin then to give them incouragment to breake and dispyse the Setled order of the Church, wherof the tendencie is but too well knowen to be to the prejudice of her Majesties Government, and the peace of the realme, And /6o/ He pretends to have ane Allowance from her Majesties Letter, Wheras her Majesties Letter contains nothing, but what is expressly qualified to be according to law, and gives no countenance to Such as manifastly transgress the Same, either by preaching, not being qualified, or by Intruding into parishes contrary to Law, And /7o/ This petition does not only mispresent the law, and pretends to ane Indullgence and Tolleration not heirtofour granted, But offers to controull the saids Lords ther most Just Sentence tho the petitioner hath not the least Interest to doe the Same; And therfor her Majesties Advocat humbly obtests that Such a petition in the very face of law, and against their lordships most Just Sentance May not only be refused, But rejected with Such a Reprimand as it deserves, Especiallie it being so well knowen that the Saids Lords administration in these matters Is with all the moderation that the peace and quyet of the kingdomes will allow, And cane consist with the authority of the law and preservation of her Majesties Government, The Lords of her Majesties privie Councell haveing this day again considered the petition given in to them by Mr John Mathers, and the Samen with answers therto by my Lord Advocat being Read in ther presence, The Saids Lords have Refused and heirby Refuse the desyre of the said petition.

At Edinburgh 21 February 1706

A1706/2/121

Procedure

Refused petition for Mr John Mathers

Concerning the petition given in and presented to the lords of her majesty’s privy council by Mr John Mathers, minister of the gospel, showing that where the petitioner having been cited to appear before the said lords 15 November past, he did in obedience thereto attend several subsequent council days without being called, and having not only given very early proofs of his affection and loyalty to her majesty’s royal person and government by congratulating her happy accession to the throne, and constantly praying for her ever since, but has also, although not obliged by law, taken the oath of allegiance and subscribed the assurance, as the said lords their records will testify, he thought himself hereby sufficiently entitled to the said lords their protection in the exercise of his ministry, conform to her majesty’s most gracious letter. All which being well known to the pursuers, they thought fit to pass from your petitioner, and delete his name out of the libel, so that he rested every way secure, and believed there was no need of appearance when the libel was called. Notwithstanding whereof, the petitioner was very much surprised to find that the pursuers, taking occasion of calling some others, not being legally qualified, have procured the said lords their order for shutting up the petitioner’s meeting house, which sentence being only levelled against the petitioner, and being pronounced parte inaudita, he humbly craves leave to represent, firstly that the petitioner was the only person who was settled in that meeting house since Doctor Weddall’s removing, and the other ministers who preached there did it only transiently at the petitioner’s determination, and were not otherwise concerned, nor had they any fixed residence in that place. Secondly, the acts of parliament libelled upon do not meet the petitioners case, for the act [of] 1693 ordained the oath of allegiance and assurance to be taken by all in public trusts, ecclesiastical, civil, or military, and is only to be understood of ministers who possess churches and benefices, but ex super abundante the petitioner is legally qualified, as is abovementioned, and it is evident that the act [of] 1695 is only framed against such as should intrude themselves into churches and benefices without a call prescribed by law, which the petitioner had never presumed to do, but contented himself to preach in by law, which the petitioner had never presumed to doe, but contented himself to preach in a meeting house to such as were inclined that way, and though this process was raised at the instigation of the minister at St Andrews, yet it is most certain that the meeting house is in the parish of St Leonards, and there is no complaint of intrusion from that minister. Thirdly, there seems no reason to quarrel the meeting house, because it is kept in the seat of the university; for it is most certain that many gentlemen and others in that place, are so averse from the present establishment, that they will neither hear the presbyterian ministers themselves, nor suffer their children to go to their churches, and it is hoped the most zealous of that persuasion will not deny that those whose inclinations are so disposed, should rather go to a meeting house, than be suffered to spend the lord’s day idly, which in a short time could undoubtedly efface all thoughts and concern for religion. And the petitioner might appeal to the masters of that university, if any of their scholars who frequent the meeting house have been deficient in any part of their duty, and have not been rather eminent examples both of virtue and good manners, and there is no fear of the receiving any ill impression there, for the petitioner takes care to preach nothing but the pure doctrine of Christianity without giving the least ground of offence to the government, either civil or ecclesiastical, and is known to be of a harmless life and conversation, and therefor craving in regard of all which, and particularly that the petitioner is qualified according to law, and that he was not called when the meeting house was shut up, though the sentence militates directly against him, that their lordships would allow him to return to the exercise of his ministry in the meeting house at St Andrews, and grant him that protection her majesty recommends to their care in her most gracious letter, as the said petition bears. The lords of her majesty’s privy council, having upon 31 January last considered the above petition given in to them by Mr John Mathers, and the same being read in their presence, the said lords delay the same till the next council day. And in the meantime appoint Sir James Stewart, her majesty’s advocate, and John Blair, agent for the Kirk, to see and answer the same. And accordingly, her majesty’s advocate gave in the following answers by way of representation viz the said Mr John Mathers had offered such a petition to the said lords against their sentence for shutting up the meeting house at St Andrews, as has not appeared since the revolution. The said lords ordained that meeting house to be shut up on the account that after Doctor Waddell was therefrom removed, other persons not qualified, but manifestly disaffected to the government, had kept up the same, to the great disturbance of the quiet and peace of the place; Mr Mathers now appears by his petition and affirms that it was his meeting house, but by what pleadable right is hitherto unknown. Secondly, he affirms that by the act of parliament [of] 1693, no minister not qualified is debarred from preaching but such as possess churches and benefices, whereas the act expressly statutes that such who offer to preach not being qualified in the terms thereof, and not having churches and benefices, should be banished [from] the realm or otherwise punished. Thirdly, he affirms that the act [of] 1695 against intruders is only against such as intrude into churches and benefices, whereas the act is expressly against any who shall exercise any part of the ministerial function in any church or perish not being thereto lawfully called and ordained. Fourthly, he avows that the other ministers who preached there in that meeting house, though they were not qualified, yet did preach there at his desire. Fifthly, he pretends the interest of the university, whereas it is manifest that nothing can be more prejudicial to the said university, and the right education of youth therein, than to give them encouragement to break and despise the settled order of the Church, whereof the tendency is but too well known to be to the prejudice of her majesty’s government, and the peace of the realm. And sixthly, he pretends to have an allowance from her majesty’s letter, whereas her majesty’s letter contains nothing but what is expressly qualified to be according to law, and gives no countenance to such as manifestly transgress the same, either by preaching, not being qualified, or by intruding into parishes contrary to law. And seventhly, this petition does not only misrepresent the law, and pretends to an indulgence and toleration not heretofore granted, but offers to check the said lords their most just sentence, though the petitioner has not the least interest to do the same. And therefore her majesty’s advocate humbly entreats that such a petition in the very face of law, and against their lordships’ most just sentence may not only be refused, but rejected with such a reprimand as it deserves, especially it being so well known that the said lords’ administration in these matters is with all the moderation that the peace and quiet of the kingdoms will allow, and can consist with the authority of the law and preservation of her majesty’s government. The lords of her majesty’s privy council having this day again considered the petition given in to them by Mr John Mathers, and the same with answers thereto by my lord advocate being read in their presence, the said lords have refused and hereby refuse the desire of the said petition.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 441-3.

2. The word ‘as’ scored out here.

3. Insertion.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 441-3.

Sederunt, 21 February 1706, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Twentie first day of February Jaj vijc and Six years

A1706/2/111

Procedure

[Sutherland elected preses]

In absence of the Lord high Chancellor and Lord President of Privie Councell The Earle of Sutherland elected preses.

At Edinburgh 21 February 1706

A1706/2/111

Procedure

[Sutherland elected preses]

In absence of [James Ogilvie, earl of Seafield] the lord high chancellor and lord president of privy council [John Gordon] the earl of Sutherland elected preses.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 441.

1. NRS, PC1/53, 441.