Act, 21 January 1692, Edinburgh

Act, 29 December 1692, Edinburgh

Att Edinburgh the Twentie one day of January Jaj vjc Nyntie two

D1692/1/251

Act

Act and Remitt Lodovick Grant of Freuchie against Sir Robert Gordon

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of ther Majesties privy Councill be Lodovick Grant of Freuchie one of the saids Lords number Shewing That That2 wher ther being ane alledged depredation Committed in June or Jully Jaj vjc Eightie nyne upon Sir Robert Gordon of Gordonstoune and his tennents of the lands of Dallas Lying near to the braes of Murray and which was pretended to have been done by some persones living upon the petitioners ground and Sir Robert in April or May last haveing raised a summonds before the saids Lords upon the acts of Parliament that relate to the landlords and Cheiftains of Clans in caices of this nature, and which comeing to be called in course the saids Lords did not sustaine process by reasone of the informalities of the executiones, and which was a direct absolviter from the Lybell in that instance and is all evinced from the process it self and acts therupon extracted and therwith produced; And upon which Gordonstoune raised new letters Containeing a dispensatione to cite all parties concerned at the marcat cross of the shyres upon Pretence that ther was not tutas accessus And the messinger in the execution of thir last letters alledged that he was deforced in his office, and that his letters ware away taken from him by some of the petitioners men tennants and servants (which was both false and Calumnious) Sir Robert gave in a most Clamerous bill in December last Representing that the process was not sustained in the first instance Becaus the defenders ware not cited personally or at ther dwalling houses and that ther was no warrant to cite at the marcat crosses And that now upon this later deforcement it was evident that the former citation at the mercat cross was all that he could do, And that thefore process might be sustained upon the first lybell In Respect that the second was violently so taken away from the messinger and this last bill haveing been called upon the twentie fourthe day of december and at that time Sir Robert haveing produced ane execution under Heugh Thane Messinger his hand bearing a Citation at the marcat Croces of Elgine and Innverness against the persones mentioned in the second Lybell upon the last of november and first of December Jaj vjc nyntie one And bearing Lykewayes ane executione of the pretended deforcement done to him in his office, And the petitioner not being here himself at the time, his Lawiers did object against the said execution as most suspect and Craved the same might ly in process till farder information were hade therof from the Petitioner in matter of Fact, The saids Lords by interloquitor superceided to give answer to the said Petition or determine the points of relevancy in relation to Gordonstounes process till the twentieone instant at which time the saids Lords ordered the petitione to be here present himself, and to produce the particular persones mentioned in their said interloquiter who had a more Immeediat dependance upon the supplicant And albeit this Lybell of Sir Robert Gordons will be found to be most Clamerous and caluminious in what may concerne the petitioner so the managing therof upon the event will be found to have been most indirect and unwarrantable Most of the defenders Called for whom the Supplicant is Craved to be Lyable not being so much as legally cited, But upon a most base and sinistreous designe a blank sheet of Paper sent over here to Edinburgh by the said Heugh Thane the messenger and filled up here at Edinburgh by Sir Robert or some petty agent at his order both as to the defenders names and as to the way and maner of their being cited and of his being deforced which as hereafter will appear will be found to be absolutely false as aforsaid, and as the petitioner does owe very much obligation to the saids Lords for allowing him a competent time to come over towards the vindication of himself from so malicious and groundless a lybell so the petitioner being acquanted from his Lawiers of what the saids Lords had ordered in relation to the premisses he had not only come over himself to attend the dyet of Councill Bot have Lykewayes brought over such others of the defenders as ware called his meniall servants and such as had a more Immediat dependance upon him In Relatione how far the petitioner or they might be concerned in this process, Bot as to these who are alledged to be the Immediat actors in the pretended depredatione and deforcement of the messinger, The saids Lords would be pleased to consider that they are not lawfullie cited, and that the executione of the messinger produced was extended in the way and maner forsaid, and is absolutely false and Calumnious And towards the Improveing wherof and that Gordonstoun may abide by the vertue of the same, ther is a bill given in to the saids Lords by such of the defenders as seen to be cheifly loadned in this Lybell, (3And for whom the supplicant in the outmost extent of law is but subsidiarie Lybale, And quher in they doe positively propone Improbation against the said execution as being absolutely false That Gordonstoune might abide be the same sub pericule falsi And which being prejudiciall to the pursuars insisting in the principall cause This Petitione given in for such of the defenders who seem to be most concerned must be legally Determined by the saids Lords before the Petitioner, or those others who are come over with him can be oblidged as is conceived to propone a legall defence in Causa, Secundo The saids Lords would be pleased to consider that this alledged depredation committed against the pursuar was done in the time of ane intestine Warr, and whill the Eenemies forces was up on the place In and about the time the depredatione was alleadged to have been Committed, so that how straitly so ever the Lewes and acts of Parliament run in the generall againest the Landlords and Chiftains of Clans in the Highlands yet that is only in time of peace and so cannot be extended to such a Circumstantiat case to have its equall force now contrair to the true Designe and Import of the Law Tertio the saids Lords would be pleased to Consider not only the Circumstances of time, And that ther was ane enemy in the Countrey who oblidged many of the comons to Joyne with them and which must Certainely allow a Relaxation from the severitie of these lawes as to Landlords and Cheifftains upon such ane occasion But Lykwayes that the petitioner did all that was then prestable by him and caused make search and inquyry for each of the pursuars goods as wer alleadged to be away taken within his bounds and caused accordingly make restitution of the same Quarto such was the prevalent of these that ware in Oppositione of the government for the tyme That the Petitioner was forced to retire himself to Innerness and did ther attend his majesties forces with a Considerable number of his oun clan and upon which account he and his men tennents and servants and others haveing a dependance upon the petitioner sufered great herships and depredationes in their cornes Catle and burning of their houses to the value of Upwards of Twelue hundred pund Sterling and wherof nather the petitioner or they have ever yett received a six penie And Therfore it is Remitted To the saids Lords Consider That as the pretended damadges done to the pursuer in this alledged Depredation Is not the hundred part of what the supplicant and his freends have suffered and for which the petitioner cannot be Lyable as is conceived for the grounds forsaid, So with all deference the supplicant hath much more reasone to apply to the saids Lords for a legall reparation of so vast and great damage done to him and his freends by these that were then in Opposition to the government and upon no other account bot for the petitioners adherence therto, then that he should be conveened as a Contradictor in this process upon a lybell so miserably patched up and Caried on by so unjust and indirect methods in relatione to the pursuars damadge which when at the bottom considered will be found to consist more in Clamour and groundless noise then of Just intrest or any thing else. And Therfore Humbly Craveing That before the saids Lords proceid to consider the principall cause and that seing Improbation is proponed for these who is most concerned in this process against the said False executione of Heugh Thaine the messenger which has Created all this trouble to the petitioner That the saids Lords would proceid to determine the Import of that point as being prejudicial and if any dificulty Occurred in the premisses, That they would call his procurator in their oun presence to be heard both against the relevancy of the Lybell and to what else way concerne the petitioners interest therin Or these others whom the petitioner has brought over As haveing a more Immediat Dependance upon the petitioner and that for the reasones and Causes aboverepresented and what upon debate might farder arise in relatione to the premisses as the said Petition bears The Lords of his Majesties Privy Councill haveing Considered the petition given in to them be the Laird of Grant with another petition given in to them be John Grant in Autharnick and other defender of the above proces at Gordonstounes instance and Haveing called both parties and their procurators and the pursuar and the Laird of Grant defender haveing Compeired both personally at the barr with their severall advocats which ware fully heard upon the subject maner of the said Petitiones The saids Lords of their majesties Privy Councill In Respect of the Laird of Grant his personall appearance Doe Sustaine Process upon the Lybell at Gordonstons instance notwithstanding of any alleadgence of Improbation proponed for the Laird of Grant or any other of the defenders Reserving the said alledgance of Improbatione to be insisted in before the Lords of session And Recomends to the saids Lords of Sessione to discuss the same sumarly without abiding the course oft he roll and the Councill Declares they will hear both parties upon the lybell, and allowes the Clerks of Councill to give up the 4Executione quarrelled notwithstanding of any former order appointing the same to remaine in their hands.

At Edinburgh 21 January 1692

D1692/1/251

Act

Act and Remit for Lodovick Grant of Freuchie against Sir Robert Gordon

Concerning a petition given in to the Lords of their majesties’ privy council by Lodovick Grant of Freuchie, one of the said lords number, showing that where there being an alleged depredation committed in June or July 1689 upon Sir Robert Gordon of Gordonstoun and his tenants of the lands of Dallas lying near to the Braes of Murray, and which was pretended to have been done by some persons living upon the petitioner’s ground and Sir Robert in April or May last having raised a summons before the said lords upon the acts of parliament that relate to the landlords and chieftains of clans in cases of this nature, and which coming to be called in course the said lords did not sustain process by reason of the informalities of the executions, and which was a direct absolvitor from the libel in that instance, and is all evinced from the process itself and acts thereupon extracted and therewith produced; and upon which Gordonstoun raised new letters containing a dispensation to cite all parties concerned at the mercat cross of the shires upon pretence that there was not tutas accessus2, and the messinger in the execution of their last letters alleged that he was deforced in his office, and that his letters were taken away from him by some of the petitioner’s men, tenants and servants (which was both false and calumnious) Sir Robert gave in a most clamorous bill in December last representing that the process was not sustained in the first instance because the defenders were not cited personally or at their dwelling houses and that there was no warrant to cite at the mercat crosses, and that now upon this later deforcement it was evident that the former citation at the mercat cross was all that he could do, and that therefore process might be sustained upon the first libel in respect that the second was violently so taken away from the messenger and this last bill having been called upon the twenty fourth day of December and at that time Sir Robert having produced an execution under Heugh Thane, messenger, his hand bearing a citation at the mercat crosses of Elgin and Inverness against the persons mentioned in the second libel upon the last of November and first of December 1691, and bearing likewise an execution of the pretended deforcement done to him in his office, and the petitioner not being here himself at the time, his lawyers did object against the said execution as most suspect and craved the same might lie in process till further information were had thereof from the petitioner in matter of fact, the said lords by interlocutor superceded to give answer to the said petition or determine the points of relevancy in relation to Gordonstoun’s process till the twenty first instant, at which time the said lords ordered the petition to be here present himself, and to produce the particular persons mentioned in their said interlocutor who had a more immediate dependence upon the supplicant, and albeit this libel of Sir Robert Gordon’s will be found to be most clamorous and calumnious in what may concern the petitioner so the managing thereof upon the event will be found to have been most indirect and unwarrantable, most of the defenders called for whom the supplicant is craved to be liable not being so much as legally cited, but upon a most base and sinistrous design a blank sheet of paper sent over here to Edinburgh by the said Heugh Thane, the messenger, and filled up here at Edinburgh by Sir Robert or some petty agent at his order, both as to the defenders names and as to the way and manner of their being cited and of his being deforced, which as hereafter will appear will be found to be absolutely false as aforesaid, and as the petitioner does owe very much obligation to the said lords for allowing him a competent time to come over towards the vindication of himself from so malicious and groundless a libel, so the petitioner being acquainted from his lawyers of what the said lords had ordered in relation to the premisses he had not only come over himself to attend the diet of council but have likewise brought over such others of the defenders as were called his menial servants and such as had a more immediate dependence upon him in relation how far the petitioner or they might be concerned in this process, but as to those who are alleged to be the immediate actors in the pretended depredation and deforcement of the messinger, the said lords would be pleased to consider that they are not lawfully cited, and that the execution of the messinger produced was extended in the way and manner forsaid, and is absolutely false and calumnious, and towards the improving whereof, and that Gordonstoun may abide by the virtue of the same, there is a bill given in to the said lords by such of the defenders as seen to be chiefly loadened in this libel, (and for whom the supplicant in the utmost extent of law is but subsidiarily liable, and where in they do positively propone improbation against the said execution as being absolutely false, that Gordonstoun might abide by the same under false proof, and which being prejudicial to the pursuers insisting in the principal cause this petition given in for such of the defenders who seem to be most concerned, must be legally determined by the said lords before the petitioner, or those others who are come over with him can be obliged as is conceived to propone a legal defence in the cause; secondly, the said lords would be pleased to consider that this alleged depredation committed against the pursuer was done in the time of ane intestine war, and while the enemy’s forces was up on the place in and about the time the depredation was alleged to have been committed, so that how straitly so ever the laws and acts of parliament run in the general against the landlords and chieftains of clans in the Highlands, yet that is only in time of peace and so cannot be extended to such a circumstantial case to have its equal force now contrary to the true design and import of the law; thirdly, the said lords would be pleased to consider not only the circumstances of time, and that there was an enemy in the country who obliged many of the commons to join with them and which must certainly allow a relaxation from the severity of these laws as to landlords and chieftains upon such an occasion, but likewise that the petitioner did all that was then prestable by him and caused make search and inquiry for each of the pursuers goods as were alleged to be taken away within his bounds and caused accordingly make restitution of the same; fourthly, such was the prevalence of these that were in opposition of the government for the time that the petitioner was forced to retire himself to Inverness and did there attend his majesties’ forces with a considerable number of his own clan and upon which account he and his men, tenants and servants and others having a dependence upon the petitioner, suffered great hardships and depredations in their corns, cattle and burning of their houses, to the value of upwards of twelve hundred pounds sterling, and whereof neither the petitioner nor they have ever yet received a six penny, and therefore it is remitted to the said lords to consider that as the pretended damages done to the pursuer in this alleged depredation is not the hundredth part of what the supplicant and his friends have suffered and for which the petitioner cannot be liable as is conceived for the grounds forsaid, so with all deference the supplicant has much more reason to apply to the said lords for a legal reparation of so vast and great damage done to him and his friends by these that were then in opposition to the government, and upon no other account but for the petitioner’s adherence thereto, than that he should be conveened as a contradictor in this process upon a libel so miserably patched up and carried on by so unjust and indirect methods in relation to the pursuer’s damage which when at the bottom considered will be found to consist more in clamour and groundless noise then of just interest or anything else. And therefore humbly craving that before the said lords proceed to consider the principal cause and that seeing improbation is proponed for these who are most concerned in this process against the said false execution of Heugh Thane the messenger which has created all this trouble to the petitioner, that the said lords would proceed to determine the import of that point as being prejudicial and if any difficulty occurred in the premises, that they would call his procurator in their own presence to be heard both against the relevancy of the libel and to what else way concern the petitioner’s interest therein or those others whom the petitioner has brought over, as having a more immediate dependence upon the petitioner and that for the reasons and causes above represented and what upon debate might further arise in relation to the premisses as the said petition bears. The lords of his majesty’s privy council having considered the petition given in to them by the laird of Grant, with another petition given in to them by John Grant in Autharnick and other defender of the above process at Gordonstoun’s instance and having called both parties and their procurators and the pursuer and the laird of Grant defender having compeared both personally at the bar with their several advocates which were fully heard upon the subject manner of the said petitions, the said lords of their majesties’ privy council in respect of the laird of Grant his personal appearance, do sustain the process upon the libel at Gordonstoun’s instance, notwithstanding of any allegation of improbation proponed for the laird of Grant, or any other of the defenders reserving the said allegation of improbation to be insisted in before the lords of session, and recommends to the said lords of session to discuss the same summarily without abiding the course of the roll and the council declares they will hear both parties upon the libel, and allow the clerks of council to give up the execution quarrelled notwithstanding of any former order appointing the same to remain in their hands.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 11r-13v.

2. Sic.

3. Closing bracket missing.

4. The word ‘petitione’ scored out here.

1. NRS, PC2/24, 11r-13v.

2. ‘safe access’