Act, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/181

Act

Act Appointing the revaluators of the Shire of Fyfe to meet againe and mean while the publict burdens be uplifted Conforme to the old valuatione

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill having Considered a Petition given in to them be the Lord Rankeillor Sir James Mcgill of Rankeillor Robert Douglas of Airdit The Laird of Montquhany and Patrick Bruce of Bumzeon Commissioners of Supply and revaluation for the Shire of Fife for them selves and in name of the most of the heritors of that Shire with a petition be the severall heritors Subscribers of the same within the said shire Compleaning upon the new revaluatione made of the said shyre with two severall adherences therto subscribed by a great many persones Togither with the answers made to the said petitione Complaining of the revaluatione Severall of his majesties privy Councillors Declared that the said Patrick Bruce of Bumzeon disouned the said first petitione wherin he is insert as a Compleaner, and desired that his name might be dilate and scored out of the same And the saids Lords haveing Considered both these petitiones with the answers forsaids made to the last of the two, They hereby appoint the Commissioners of Supply and revaluators of the said Shire of Fyfe to Conveen and meet againe at Kirkaldie upon the fiftein day of march nixt Ther to review the said valuatione and to take in and receive all such Complaints as shall be made and offered to them by any persones who alledge themselves Lesed by the said revaluation and to Consider, And in the mean time till the parties concerned be heard and the revaluatione be revised approven and perfected Ordains his majesties Supply and all other publict burdens and Impositiones whatsomever within the shire of Fyfe in use to be up lifted and Levied according to the old valuation in the moneth of may Jaj vic nyntie thrie To be payed exacted and Collected Conforme to the said old valuation of the said shire And nowayes according to the new revaluation2 of the said shyre.

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/181

Act

Act Appointing the revaluators of the Shire of Fyfe to meet againe and mean while the publict burdens be uplifted Conforme to the old valuatione

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill having Considered a Petition given in to them be the Lord Rankeillor Sir James Mcgill of Rankeillor Robert Douglas of Airdit The Laird of Montquhany and Patrick Bruce of Bumzeon Commissioners of Supply and revaluation for the Shire of Fife for them selves and in name of the most of the heritors of that Shire with a petition be the severall heritors Subscribers of the same within the said shire Compleaning upon the new revaluatione made of the said shyre with two severall adherences therto subscribed by a great many persones Togither with the answers made to the said petitione Complaining of the revaluatione Severall of his majesties privy Councillors Declared that the said Patrick Bruce of Bumzeon disouned the said first petitione wherin he is insert as a Compleaner, and desired that his name might be dilate and scored out of the same And the saids Lords haveing Considered both these petitiones with the answers forsaids made to the last of the two, They hereby appoint the Commissioners of Supply and revaluators of the said Shire of Fyfe to Conveen and meet againe at Kirkaldie upon the fiftein day of march nixt Ther to review the said valuatione and to take in and receive all such Complaints as shall be made and offered to them by any persones who alledge themselves Lesed by the said revaluation and to Consider, And in the mean time till the parties concerned be heard and the revaluatione be revised approven and perfected Ordains his majesties Supply and all other publict burdens and Impositiones whatsomever within the shire of Fyfe in use to be up lifted and Levied according to the old valuation in the moneth of may Jaj vic nyntie thrie To be payed exacted and Collected Conforme to the said old valuation of the said shire And nowayes according to the new revaluation2 of the said shyre.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 29v-30v.

2. The prefix ‘re’ is an insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 29v-30v.

2. The prefix ‘re’ is an insertion.

Act, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/171

Act

Act appointing the2 the3 lists for the polemoney of the Shire of Fyfe to be made according to the old valuation

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Doe hereby Authorize the lists for the polemoney within the bounds of the Shire of Fife to be made and taken up according to the old valuation of the said shyre, And not according to the new valuation thereof lately made And ordaines intimation heirof to be made at all the paroch Churches within the said shire, That all persones concerned may have timeous Nottice heirof and allowers thir presents to be printed.

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/171

Act

Act appointing the2 the3 lists for the polemoney of the Shire of Fyfe to be made according to the old valuation

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Doe hereby Authorize the lists for the polemoney within the bounds of the Shire of Fife to be made and taken up according to the old valuation of the said shyre, And not according to the new valuation thereof lately made And ordaines intimation heirof to be made at all the paroch Churches within the said shire, That all persones concerned may have timeous Nottice heirof and allowers thir presents to be printed.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 29v.

2. The phrase ‘revaluators of Fyfe Shyre’ scored out here.

3. Sic.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 29v.

2. The phrase ‘revaluators of Fyfe Shyre’ scored out here.

3. Sic.

Act, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/161

Act

Act Adhereing to the Additionall Commissioners For Fyfe

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill having Considered a petition given in to them be Sir James Mcgill of Rankeillor George Moncreiff of Reddie Robert Hay of Strowie and others with the answers made therto be the Adittionall Commissioners and both parties being Called Compeired Sir Patrick Home as advocat for the Additionall Commissioners 2 But neither Sir James Mcgill of Rankeillor nor any others who petition with him haveing appeared, The saids Lords of his majesties privy Councill, Having Considered both petitiones They refuse the desire of the petition given in for Rankeillor and others with him, And Adhers to the Commission formerly granted Nominating additionall Commissioners and Declairs the same to stand and Continue in full force and effect.

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/161

Act

Act Adhereing to the Additionall Commissioners For Fyfe

The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill having Considered a petition given in to them be Sir James Mcgill of Rankeillor George Moncreiff of Reddie Robert Hay of Strowie and others with the answers made therto be the Adittionall Commissioners and both parties being Called Compeired Sir Patrick Home as advocat for the Additionall Commissioners 2 But neither Sir James Mcgill of Rankeillor nor any others who petition with him haveing appeared, The saids Lords of his majesties privy Councill, Having Considered both petitiones They refuse the desire of the petition given in for Rankeillor and others with him, And Adhers to the Commission formerly granted Nominating additionall Commissioners and Declairs the same to stand and Continue in full force and effect.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 29v.

2. The phrase ‘and both parties being Called’ scored out here.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 29v.

2. The phrase ‘and both parties being Called’ scored out here.

Act, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/151

Act

Act Scot of Heychester

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be Gordon Scot of Heychester Shewing That wher the petitioner obtained Decreet of parliament against the Earle of Seaforth for a Considerable Sum of money Wherupon the petitioner is to doe Dilligence against the said Earle and against the Countess Douger his mother and haveing Imployed Severale Messengers for that effect They declyne to execute the petitioners dilligence and refuse to undertake the same not finding safe 2 access in the execution of their offices within the Earles Countrey unless they were assisted by Some of the nixt adjacent forces And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be pleased to allow the petitioner a Competent assistance of his majesties forces at Fort William Inverness or wher ther are lying nixt adjacent to the places wher the petitioners said legall dilligence is to be put in executione to Support and protect the messengers that shall be Imployed by the petitioner in the due execution of his legall dilligence against the said Earle and his mother by horning poynding areistment or otherwayes And to Recomend to the Governor of Fort William the Comander of the forces at Inverness or other places adjacent for the time to Grant Suitable parties when Called for to the effect forsaid As the said petition bears The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill having Considered this petition given in to them be the above Gidion Scot of Heychester They herby Recomend to Sir Thomas Livingstoune Comander in Chief of his majesties forces within this kingdome To give orders to the Governour of Fort William or Comander of the forces at Inverness or other places adjacent to furnish the petitioner with Competent parties of his majesties forces for Suporting and protecting the messengers who shall be Imployed by him in the due execution of his legall Dilligence upon the said Decreet of parliament.

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/151

Act

Act Scot of Heychester

Anent a Petition given in to the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill be Gordon Scot of Heychester Shewing That wher the petitioner obtained Decreet of parliament against the Earle of Seaforth for a Considerable Sum of money Wherupon the petitioner is to doe Dilligence against the said Earle and against the Countess Douger his mother and haveing Imployed Severale Messengers for that effect They declyne to execute the petitioners dilligence and refuse to undertake the same not finding safe 2 access in the execution of their offices within the Earles Countrey unless they were assisted by Some of the nixt adjacent forces And Therfore Humbly Craveing the saids Lords would be pleased to allow the petitioner a Competent assistance of his majesties forces at Fort William Inverness or wher ther are lying nixt adjacent to the places wher the petitioners said legall dilligence is to be put in executione to Support and protect the messengers that shall be Imployed by the petitioner in the due execution of his legall dilligence against the said Earle and his mother by horning poynding areistment or otherwayes And to Recomend to the Governor of Fort William the Comander of the forces at Inverness or other places adjacent for the time to Grant Suitable parties when Called for to the effect forsaid As the said petition bears The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill having Considered this petition given in to them be the above Gidion Scot of Heychester They herby Recomend to Sir Thomas Livingstoune Comander in Chief of his majesties forces within this kingdome To give orders to the Governour of Fort William or Comander of the forces at Inverness or other places adjacent to furnish the petitioner with Competent parties of his majesties forces for Suporting and protecting the messengers who shall be Imployed by him in the due execution of his legall Dilligence upon the said Decreet of parliament.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 29r.

2. An illegible word scored out here.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 29r.

2. An illegible word scored out here.

Act, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/141

Act

Act Sir John Dempster of Pitliver

Anent the petition given in to the Lords of his majesties privy Councill be Sir John Dempster of Pitliver Shewing That the petitioner haveing been Decerned by decreet of parliament to pay a great soume of money to Gidion Scot of Heychester; The Earle of Seaforth and his mother the Countess Dowager are ordained by the forsaid Decreet to refound and pay back the same to the petitioner For payment wherof the petitioner has raised letters of horning and areistment and other dilligence against the said Earle and his mother And having Imployed Severall messingers to execute the same they have returned the petitioners letters unexecute and not finding tutum accessum in the Earles Countrey and altogither refuse to undertake the due executione therof unless asisted by some of the nixt adjacent forces wherby the petitioner is in hazard to Loss that debt for want of a due execution of the Law unless their Lordships provyde remeedie, And Therfore humbly Craveing the saids Lords In Consideration of the premisses to allow the petitioner a Competent assistance of his majesties forces at Fort William Inverness or wher they are Lying nixt adjacent to the places wher the said dilligence Is to be put in executione to support and protect the messengers that shall be Imployed be the petitioner in the due execution of his legall dilligence against the Earle and his mother by horning poynding Areistment or otherwayes, And to Recomend to the governor of Fort William the Comand of the forces at Innverness or other places Adjacent to Grant Suitable parties when Called for to the effect forsaid as the petition bears, The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Having Considered the above petition given in to them be the above Sir John Dempster of Pitliver They heirby Recomend to Sir Thomas Livingstoune Comander in Chief of his majesties forces within the kingdome to give orders to the governor of Fort William or Comander of the forces at Innverness or other places adjacent To furnish the petitioner with Competent parties of his majesties forces for supporting and protecting the messengers who Shall be Imployed by him in the due execution of his legall dilligence upon the said Decreet of parliament.

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/141

Act

Act Sir John Dempster of Pitliver

Anent the petition given in to the Lords of his majesties privy Councill be Sir John Dempster of Pitliver Shewing That the petitioner haveing been Decerned by decreet of parliament to pay a great soume of money to Gidion Scot of Heychester; The Earle of Seaforth and his mother the Countess Dowager are ordained by the forsaid Decreet to refound and pay back the same to the petitioner For payment wherof the petitioner has raised letters of horning and areistment and other dilligence against the said Earle and his mother And having Imployed Severall messingers to execute the same they have returned the petitioners letters unexecute and not finding tutum accessum in the Earles Countrey and altogither refuse to undertake the due executione therof unless asisted by some of the nixt adjacent forces wherby the petitioner is in hazard to Loss that debt for want of a due execution of the Law unless their Lordships provyde remeedie, And Therfore humbly Craveing the saids Lords In Consideration of the premisses to allow the petitioner a Competent assistance of his majesties forces at Fort William Inverness or wher they are Lying nixt adjacent to the places wher the said dilligence Is to be put in executione to support and protect the messengers that shall be Imployed be the petitioner in the due execution of his legall dilligence against the Earle and his mother by horning poynding Areistment or otherwayes, And to Recomend to the governor of Fort William the Comand of the forces at Innverness or other places Adjacent to Grant Suitable parties when Called for to the effect forsaid as the petition bears, The Lords of his Majesties privy Councill Having Considered the above petition given in to them be the above Sir John Dempster of Pitliver They heirby Recomend to Sir Thomas Livingstoune Comander in Chief of his majesties forces within the kingdome to give orders to the governor of Fort William or Comander of the forces at Innverness or other places adjacent To furnish the petitioner with Competent parties of his majesties forces for supporting and protecting the messengers who Shall be Imployed by him in the due execution of his legall dilligence upon the said Decreet of parliament.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 27v-28v.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 27v-28v.

Act, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/131

Act

Act Ordaineing John Baine and Robert Douglas to be Clerk and Collector of the supply in the Shire of Fyfe

The Lords of his majesties privy Councill Having Considered Ane petition given in to them be the Earle of Crafurd Lord Rankeillor and others present at the election of John Bayn to be Clerk and Robert Douglass of Strathendry to be Collector of the supply of the Shire of Fyfe with two Counter petitiones given in against the same be John Orock and James Crafurd of Mountwhany formerly in the forsaid officers of Clerk and Collector They heirby Grant the desire of the first petition and authorizes the said John Bayne and Robert Douglas to act and exerce the offices of Clerk and Collector in the said shire of Fyfe the subsequent termes supply for Candlimiss nixt and therafter whom they find to be the only Clerk and Collector duely and legally Chosen and Discharges the said James Crafurd and John Arrock from exercing the saids offices after the said terme of Candlimiss and appoints the said John Arrock and James Crafurd late Clerk and Collector To deliver and give in to the said John Bayne and Robert Douglas present Clerk and Collector all or any Lists of the poleable persones and all or any soumes of the pole money which has been payed in to them Togither with all papers or books which they have anent the present polemoney And Ordaines letters of horning on […] dayes and others needfull to be direct heirupon in forme as effeirs.

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/131

Act

Act Ordaineing John Baine and Robert Douglas to be Clerk and Collector of the supply in the Shire of Fyfe

The Lords of his majesties privy Councill Having Considered Ane petition given in to them be the Earle of Crafurd Lord Rankeillor and others present at the election of John Bayn to be Clerk and Robert Douglass of Strathendry to be Collector of the supply of the Shire of Fyfe with two Counter petitiones given in against the same be John Orock and James Crafurd of Mountwhany formerly in the forsaid officers of Clerk and Collector They heirby Grant the desire of the first petition and authorizes the said John Bayne and Robert Douglas to act and exerce the offices of Clerk and Collector in the said shire of Fyfe the subsequent termes supply for Candlimiss nixt and therafter whom they find to be the only Clerk and Collector duely and legally Chosen and Discharges the said James Crafurd and John Arrock from exercing the saids offices after the said terme of Candlimiss and appoints the said John Arrock and James Crafurd late Clerk and Collector To deliver and give in to the said John Bayne and Robert Douglas present Clerk and Collector all or any Lists of the poleable persones and all or any soumes of the pole money which has been payed in to them Togither with all papers or books which they have anent the present polemoney And Ordaines letters of horning on […] dayes and others needfull to be direct heirupon in forme as effeirs.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 27v-28r.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 27v-28r.

Decreet, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/121

Decreet

Decreet absolvitor The Countess of Rothes and others against The Earle of Melvill and others

Anent the Complaint or Lybell reconventione raised before the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill at the instance of George Earle of Melvill Lord privy Seall David Earle of Leven and Alexander Lord Raith Lord Thesaurer depute The master of Burleigh Mr James Melvill of Cassingray Mr James Melvill of Hallhill Sir James Mcgiee of Rankeillor James Lundine of Auchtermairnie George Moncreiff of Reddie Robert Hay of Strenrey John Hay of Naughtone younger Robert Douglass of Airdit James Crafurd of Mountquhany James Lundine of Straithairly Mr Robert Whyt younger of Bannochie, Alexander Melvill of Murdocairne John Lessly of quarter John Moncreiff of Mornypea Mr David Scrimgeor of Cart-moir Walter Bosswell of Balbartane James Smittoune the Lady Castlehavens baillie John Weymes younger of Bogie John Arnot of Ballcornie David Balfour of Grange James Maxwell of Leckybank and John Melvill of Carsbeirdoe with Concourse of Sir James Stewart his majesties advocat for his highnes intrest in the matter underwritten Makeing Mention That wher by the lawes and acts of parliament and the Constant Custome and practise of this and all other weell Governed nationes The Stoping hindering and interupting of persones Imployed by his majestie in the prosecution of the trust reposed upon them by the Lawes of the Nation Especially wher the persones Stoped and interupted are his majesties privy Councillors and officers of state and the bussines in which they were Imployed was towards the Collecting and ingathering of the Subsidies offered to his Majestie for the necesser defence and Suport of the Natione and Government, and the troubling mollesting and Disquesting of his majesties Leidges Especially Such as are of known integrity and Good affectione to his Majesties service and intrusted as his Majesties privy Councillors, officers of state and other Imployments of trust are Ryots and Crimes of a high nature severly punishable and all thrie are airt and part and accessory therto by hounding out or Rathihabition of these unwarrantable Deeds are punishable as the principall parties or offenders Nevertheless It is of verity That Margret Countess of Rothes John Lord Lessly and Patrick Bruce of Brinzeon ther Shireff Depute in the Shire of Fyfe are Guilty or airt and pairt therof In so farr as The Slateing ordering and uplifting of the pole Imposed by the Last Session of this Curent parliament Being Remitted to the Commissioners of assessment and ther quorum, according to the rules exprest in the act of parliament and proclamationes of privy Councill And the Commissioners of the Shyr of Fyfe haveing accordingly mett and given order for making and reporting of Lists of Poleable persones, Ther was another dyet appointed to meet at Couper the thrid Tuesday of October last, And whatever differences were amongst the Commissioners of the said Shire, yet all did agree that their should be a meetting upon the said thrid Tuesday of October, And the said Patrick Bruce was not Suficiently authorized to that effect yet he did advertise the severall Commissioners of the dyet by missive letters Shewing that he was appointed by the last meeting to acquaint the saids Commissioners that the nixt meeting was to be upon the thrid Tusday of October at the ordinary time and place of meeting for receiving in Lists and Laying doun Such other methods as might best Conduce for the Collecting and ingathering of the pole, And that it was expected the Commissioners would keep that dyet And all the saids pursuers haveing repaired to the ordinary place at the ordinary time of meetting the said day In prosecution and Discharge of thr dutie and trust, They entered to the high Tolbooth the ordinary place of Meeting precisly at ten of the Cloak which was the usuall hour as was expressly in former advertisments, And the said Patrick Bruce haveing aby end and designe to give other directions in relation to the Collection of the said pole then would be acceptable to the plurallity of the said Shire And understanding that many Commissioners were a comeing that would not agree to these by ends and designes He with other two Commissioners Viz Robert Douglas of Strenry and David Burgh the said Countes of Rothes her baillie Did take upon them to Choise a process and act as a meetting of the Shyre by anticipatione before the ordinary time and before the saids pursuers Could be present of purpose to eleid the designe of the Meeting and that the matter might not be ordered according to the inclynation of the plurality of the Shyre but reflecting a litle that the saids pursuers who were a Coming being a full meeting of the Shyre would easily Over rule What a paikt meeting of thrie hade done by anticipation and understanding that the saids pursuers were allready come to the foot of the stair Which leads to the usuall place of meetting The said pretended meetting of thrie Dissolved and the said Shireff depute designing to put ane indignity and affront upon the saids pursuers Did take upon him to hold a Schame Shireff2 Court and went to the burgh in such a hast That he hade scarce time to fence the Court before they were entred and when the saids pursuers came in they were Surprized to see the said Patrick Bruce Sitting in that place and tho the Clerk went aside and that ther was no bussines a doeing or ready to be done yet he satt still useing indecent expressiones and behavior and pretending that the said pursuers hade interupted a Shireff Court and Desireing them to remove To Which the saids pursuers answered That they were not only Called to that time and place for his majesties Service by the Shireff depute himself But that the ordinary dyet and hour of Cause of the Shireff Court was not yet come, Which begins not till after Eleven a Cloak And that the Commissioners bussines would be over before that time, And that when meetings of the shire happen at the same time with the shireff Court The Court is in use to Sitt in another roome; yet the Said Shireff depute persisted and notwithstanding of all this interuptione the Commissioners meeting was ended at Eleven a Cloak which is the ordinary hour of Cause for fenceing the Shirreff Court both by Custome and by the Eightie sixt act parliament Eleventh King James Sixth And for a furder evidence that ther was no other designe But to frustrat the meeting intended for his majesties Service The saids pursuers did meett the said Robert Douglass of Strainry and David Burgh the Countess of Rothes baillie as they came doune the stairs from the pretended meetting of thrie and so soon as the saids pursuers meetting was done, The said Shireff depute came Immediatly doune after the saids pursuers ther being no other bussines in the Shireff Court But to disappoint the meetting of the Shire, And before the saids pursuers came to Couper The said Patrick Bruce did publictly oun and declare That if the saids pursuers came before ten a Cloak they should find the doors Shutt if after he Should disapoint them another way, All which unwarrantable procedor was allowed Authorized and approven of by the Saids Margrat Countess of Rothes And John Lord Lessly, and as if the forsaid indignities done to the Cautioners of the shire to his majesties privy Councillors and officers of state and others were not Suficient The saids defenders not only oun and Justifie all that hath passed, But have raised a most Malicious and groundless process before the Lords of his majesties privy Councill against the saids pursuers as if they hade invaded and disturbed a Constitute Court of purpose to Occasione furder vexation and trouble And Therfore the persones above Complained upon Ought to be Decerned in the sum of […] for damnages and expences sustained by the saids pursuers in the forsaid unnecessar trouble and expences And farder punished in ther persons and goods to the terror of others to Comitt the like in time comeing And Anent The Charge given to the saids defenders To have Compeired personally before the saids Lords of privy Councill at ane Certaine day now bygone To have answered to the forsaid Complaint And to have heard and Seen Such order and Course taken theranent As the saids Lords Should think fitt Under the paine of rebellion and puting of them to the horn with Certification etc As in the principall Letters or Lybell of Reconvention raised in the said matter with the executione therof at more Length is Contained Which Lybell being upon the fourtein day of november instant Called in presence of the saids Lords of privy Councill, And the said Earle of Melvill, Lord privy Seall, Earle of Leven and Lord Raith Thesaurer depute having risen and removed to the foot of the Councill board and all or most of the saids pursuers Compeiring personally with Mr Hew Dalrymple Mr Rodrick Mckenzie and Mr George Alexander ther advocats And the said Countess of Rothes one of the defenders being Called But not Compeiring And the said Lord Lessly and Patrick Bruce the other two defenders Compeiring personally with Sir Patrick Home and Mr David Cuninghame ther advocats The Lybell and answers therto for the defenders being read And both parties advocats being fully heard It was put to the vote Whither admitt this Lybell of Reconvention to probatione or Advyse the probation allready adduced in the principall Lybell at the Countess of Rothes her Lybell should be advysed, And the said Lybell of Reconvention at the instance of the said Earle of Melvill Earle of Leven Lord Raith and others against the Countess of Rothes Lord Lessly and Patrick Bruce being again this day Called in presence of the saids Lords of his majesties privy Councill, And Mr Robert Whyt younger of Benochie one of the pursuers Compeiring personally with Mr George Alexander advocat his procurator all the rest being absent, And the said Lord Lessly one of the defenders Compeiring also personally with Sir Patrick Home and Mr David Cuninghame advocats for the haill defenders and the other two being absent The saids Lords haveing Considered the Lybell and answers made therto They Find the Lybell not Relevant And Therfore Have Assoylzied and heirby Assoylzies the saids defenders from the haill points and articles of the said lybell, and Declares them quyt therof and free therfrae in time comeing.

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 1695

D1695/11/121

Decreet

Decreet absolvitor The Countess of Rothes and others against The Earle of Melvill and others

Anent the Complaint or Lybell reconventione raised before the Lords of his Majesties privy Councill at the instance of George Earle of Melvill Lord privy Seall David Earle of Leven and Alexander Lord Raith Lord Thesaurer depute The master of Burleigh Mr James Melvill of Cassingray Mr James Melvill of Hallhill Sir James Mcgiee of Rankeillor James Lundine of Auchtermairnie George Moncreiff of Reddie Robert Hay of Strenrey John Hay of Naughtone younger Robert Douglass of Airdit James Crafurd of Mountquhany James Lundine of Straithairly Mr Robert Whyt younger of Bannochie, Alexander Melvill of Murdocairne John Lessly of quarter John Moncreiff of Mornypea Mr David Scrimgeor of Cart-moir Walter Bosswell of Balbartane James Smittoune the Lady Castlehavens baillie John Weymes younger of Bogie John Arnot of Ballcornie David Balfour of Grange James Maxwell of Leckybank and John Melvill of Carsbeirdoe with Concourse of Sir James Stewart his majesties advocat for his highnes intrest in the matter underwritten Makeing Mention That wher by the lawes and acts of parliament and the Constant Custome and practise of this and all other weell Governed nationes The Stoping hindering and interupting of persones Imployed by his majestie in the prosecution of the trust reposed upon them by the Lawes of the Nation Especially wher the persones Stoped and interupted are his majesties privy Councillors and officers of state and the bussines in which they were Imployed was towards the Collecting and ingathering of the Subsidies offered to his Majestie for the necesser defence and Suport of the Natione and Government, and the troubling mollesting and Disquesting of his majesties Leidges Especially Such as are of known integrity and Good affectione to his Majesties service and intrusted as his Majesties privy Councillors, officers of state and other Imployments of trust are Ryots and Crimes of a high nature severly punishable and all thrie are airt and part and accessory therto by hounding out or Rathihabition of these unwarrantable Deeds are punishable as the principall parties or offenders Nevertheless It is of verity That Margret Countess of Rothes John Lord Lessly and Patrick Bruce of Brinzeon ther Shireff Depute in the Shire of Fyfe are Guilty or airt and pairt therof In so farr as The Slateing ordering and uplifting of the pole Imposed by the Last Session of this Curent parliament Being Remitted to the Commissioners of assessment and ther quorum, according to the rules exprest in the act of parliament and proclamationes of privy Councill And the Commissioners of the Shyr of Fyfe haveing accordingly mett and given order for making and reporting of Lists of Poleable persones, Ther was another dyet appointed to meet at Couper the thrid Tuesday of October last, And whatever differences were amongst the Commissioners of the said Shire, yet all did agree that their should be a meetting upon the said thrid Tuesday of October, And the said Patrick Bruce was not Suficiently authorized to that effect yet he did advertise the severall Commissioners of the dyet by missive letters Shewing that he was appointed by the last meeting to acquaint the saids Commissioners that the nixt meeting was to be upon the thrid Tusday of October at the ordinary time and place of meeting for receiving in Lists and Laying doun Such other methods as might best Conduce for the Collecting and ingathering of the pole, And that it was expected the Commissioners would keep that dyet And all the saids pursuers haveing repaired to the ordinary place at the ordinary time of meetting the said day In prosecution and Discharge of thr dutie and trust, They entered to the high Tolbooth the ordinary place of Meeting precisly at ten of the Cloak which was the usuall hour as was expressly in former advertisments, And the said Patrick Bruce haveing aby end and designe to give other directions in relation to the Collection of the said pole then would be acceptable to the plurallity of the said Shire And understanding that many Commissioners were a comeing that would not agree to these by ends and designes He with other two Commissioners Viz Robert Douglas of Strenry and David Burgh the said Countes of Rothes her baillie Did take upon them to Choise a process and act as a meetting of the Shyre by anticipatione before the ordinary time and before the saids pursuers Could be present of purpose to eleid the designe of the Meeting and that the matter might not be ordered according to the inclynation of the plurality of the Shyre but reflecting a litle that the saids pursuers who were a Coming being a full meeting of the Shyre would easily Over rule What a paikt meeting of thrie hade done by anticipation and understanding that the saids pursuers were allready come to the foot of the stair Which leads to the usuall place of meetting The said pretended meetting of thrie Dissolved and the said Shireff depute designing to put ane indignity and affront upon the saids pursuers Did take upon him to hold a Schame Shireff2 Court and went to the burgh in such a hast That he hade scarce time to fence the Court before they were entred and when the saids pursuers came in they were Surprized to see the said Patrick Bruce Sitting in that place and tho the Clerk went aside and that ther was no bussines a doeing or ready to be done yet he satt still useing indecent expressiones and behavior and pretending that the said pursuers hade interupted a Shireff Court and Desireing them to remove To Which the saids pursuers answered That they were not only Called to that time and place for his majesties Service by the Shireff depute himself But that the ordinary dyet and hour of Cause of the Shireff Court was not yet come, Which begins not till after Eleven a Cloak And that the Commissioners bussines would be over before that time, And that when meetings of the shire happen at the same time with the shireff Court The Court is in use to Sitt in another roome; yet the Said Shireff depute persisted and notwithstanding of all this interuptione the Commissioners meeting was ended at Eleven a Cloak which is the ordinary hour of Cause for fenceing the Shirreff Court both by Custome and by the Eightie sixt act parliament Eleventh King James Sixth And for a furder evidence that ther was no other designe But to frustrat the meeting intended for his majesties Service The saids pursuers did meett the said Robert Douglass of Strainry and David Burgh the Countess of Rothes baillie as they came doune the stairs from the pretended meetting of thrie and so soon as the saids pursuers meetting was done, The said Shireff depute came Immediatly doune after the saids pursuers ther being no other bussines in the Shireff Court But to disappoint the meetting of the Shire, And before the saids pursuers came to Couper The said Patrick Bruce did publictly oun and declare That if the saids pursuers came before ten a Cloak they should find the doors Shutt if after he Should disapoint them another way, All which unwarrantable procedor was allowed Authorized and approven of by the Saids Margrat Countess of Rothes And John Lord Lessly, and as if the forsaid indignities done to the Cautioners of the shire to his majesties privy Councillors and officers of state and others were not Suficient The saids defenders not only oun and Justifie all that hath passed, But have raised a most Malicious and groundless process before the Lords of his majesties privy Councill against the saids pursuers as if they hade invaded and disturbed a Constitute Court of purpose to Occasione furder vexation and trouble And Therfore the persones above Complained upon Ought to be Decerned in the sum of […] for damnages and expences sustained by the saids pursuers in the forsaid unnecessar trouble and expences And farder punished in ther persons and goods to the terror of others to Comitt the like in time comeing And Anent The Charge given to the saids defenders To have Compeired personally before the saids Lords of privy Councill at ane Certaine day now bygone To have answered to the forsaid Complaint And to have heard and Seen Such order and Course taken theranent As the saids Lords Should think fitt Under the paine of rebellion and puting of them to the horn with Certification etc As in the principall Letters or Lybell of Reconvention raised in the said matter with the executione therof at more Length is Contained Which Lybell being upon the fourtein day of november instant Called in presence of the saids Lords of privy Councill, And the said Earle of Melvill, Lord privy Seall, Earle of Leven and Lord Raith Thesaurer depute having risen and removed to the foot of the Councill board and all or most of the saids pursuers Compeiring personally with Mr Hew Dalrymple Mr Rodrick Mckenzie and Mr George Alexander ther advocats And the said Countess of Rothes one of the defenders being Called But not Compeiring And the said Lord Lessly and Patrick Bruce the other two defenders Compeiring personally with Sir Patrick Home and Mr David Cuninghame ther advocats The Lybell and answers therto for the defenders being read And both parties advocats being fully heard It was put to the vote Whither admitt this Lybell of Reconvention to probatione or Advyse the probation allready adduced in the principall Lybell at the Countess of Rothes her Lybell should be advysed, And the said Lybell of Reconvention at the instance of the said Earle of Melvill Earle of Leven Lord Raith and others against the Countess of Rothes Lord Lessly and Patrick Bruce being again this day Called in presence of the saids Lords of his majesties privy Councill, And Mr Robert Whyt younger of Benochie one of the pursuers Compeiring personally with Mr George Alexander advocat his procurator all the rest being absent, And the said Lord Lessly one of the defenders Compeiring also personally with Sir Patrick Home and Mr David Cuninghame advocats for the haill defenders and the other two being absent The saids Lords haveing Considered the Lybell and answers made therto They Find the Lybell not Relevant And Therfore Have Assoylzied and heirby Assoylzies the saids defenders from the haill points and articles of the said lybell, and Declares them quyt therof and free therfrae in time comeing.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 25r-27v.

2. Insertion.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 25r-27v.

2. Insertion.

Sederunt, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 16951

D1695/11/112

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Southerland; Earl of Forfar; Lord Yester; Lord Carmicheall; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Enstruther; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Stivenson; Laird of Leyes; Laird of Pollock; The Provest of Edinburgh

Edinburgh Tuesday 19th November 16951

D1695/11/112

Sederunt

Lord Chancelor; Earl of Southerland; Earl of Forfar; Lord Yester; Lord Carmicheall; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Enstruther; Mr Fra: Montgomry; Laird of Stivenson; Laird of Leyes; Laird of Pollock; The Provest of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC2/26, 25r.

2. NRS, PC2/26, 25r.

1. NRS, PC2/26, 25r.

2. NRS, PC2/26, 25r.

Warrant, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

At Edinburgh tuesday the nynteenth day of November Jaj vjc nynty and fyve years

A1695/11/191

Warrant

Warrand to Lord Advocat and Sollicitor to give in bonds to the Clerks of Councill and to take new bonds of some persones etc

The Lord Advocat Haveing acquainted the Lords of his majesties privy Councill That He had taken baile from the persones following who have been in France since the Late act of parliament dischargeing any correspondence therewith viz Alexander Sandilands Charles Lermonth Philip Hamilton of Kilbrachmont Alexander Tatt Skipper Walter Nisbet Captaine James Adamsone and Charles Farquharsone2 and that the bonds were in his Lordships Hands and that Robert King hes procured Master John Buchan to give paroll for Him and since hes given bond to Sir James Oglivie his majesties Sollicitor The said Lords of privy Councill doe Hereby recomend to the said Lord Advocat to delyver in these bonds to their Clerks of privy Councill and ordaines them to take bond of the said Robert King and to take new bond of the other persons who have granted bonds alreadie with sufficient Cautione for each of the said persones and his Lordship haveing Lykewayes acquainted the said Lords That the Laird of Craigie Wallace and his Brother have found Cautione and that their bonds are lyeing in the Clerks of Councills hands They ordaine their said Clerks to take new bonds with sufficient Cautione for Craigie and his brother and appoynt the Haill bonds to be granted by the Haill persons abovenamed to be, That they shall Live peaceably under and with all submissione to the present Government of his majestie King William and Queen Mary And that they shall not act consult nor contryve any thing in prejudice thereof nor Converse or Correspond with any Rebells and that they shall appear before the said Lords of his majesties Privy Councill when called for under the severall penalties contained in their respective bonds alreadie granted by them and ordaines the macers of privy Councill to apprehend and secure the haill persons abovenamed untill they give bond and find caution in maner above appoynted And appoynts Sir James Oglivie to give in the bond which he hath taken from the said Robert King to the said Clarks of privie Councill

At Edinburgh tuesday the nynteenth day of November Jaj vjc nynty and fyve years

A1695/11/191

Warrant

Warrand to Lord Advocat and Sollicitor to give in bonds to the Clerks of Councill and to take new bonds of some persones etc

The Lord Advocat Haveing acquainted the Lords of his majesties privy Councill That He had taken baile from the persones following who have been in France since the Late act of parliament dischargeing any correspondence therewith viz Alexander Sandilands Charles Lermonth Philip Hamilton of Kilbrachmont Alexander Tatt Skipper Walter Nisbet Captaine James Adamsone and Charles Farquharsone2 and that the bonds were in his Lordships Hands and that Robert King hes procured Master John Buchan to give paroll for Him and since hes given bond to Sir James Oglivie his majesties Sollicitor The said Lords of privy Councill doe Hereby recomend to the said Lord Advocat to delyver in these bonds to their Clerks of privy Councill and ordaines them to take bond of the said Robert King and to take new bond of the other persons who have granted bonds alreadie with sufficient Cautione for each of the said persones and his Lordship haveing Lykewayes acquainted the said Lords That the Laird of Craigie Wallace and his Brother have found Cautione and that their bonds are lyeing in the Clerks of Councills hands They ordaine their said Clerks to take new bonds with sufficient Cautione for Craigie and his brother and appoynt the Haill bonds to be granted by the Haill persons abovenamed to be, That they shall Live peaceably under and with all submissione to the present Government of his majestie King William and Queen Mary And that they shall not act consult nor contryve any thing in prejudice thereof nor Converse or Correspond with any Rebells and that they shall appear before the said Lords of his majesties Privy Councill when called for under the severall penalties contained in their respective bonds alreadie granted by them and ordaines the macers of privy Councill to apprehend and secure the haill persons abovenamed untill they give bond and find caution in maner above appoynted And appoynts Sir James Oglivie to give in the bond which he hath taken from the said Robert King to the said Clarks of privie Councill

1. NRS, PC1/50, 263-4.

2. The letter ‘h’ is an insertion.

1. NRS, PC1/50, 263-4.

2. The letter ‘h’ is an insertion.

Sederunt, 19 November 1695, Edinburgh

At Edinburgh tuesday the nynteenth day of November Jaj vjc nynty and fyve years1

A1695/11/182

Sederunt

Lord Chancellour; Earl of Southerland; Earl of Forfar; Lord Yester; Lord Carmichaell; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Anstruther; Mr Fr Montgomery; Laird of Stevensone; Laird of Leyes; Laird of Pollock; Sir Rott Cheisley provost of Edinburgh

At Edinburgh tuesday the nynteenth day of November Jaj vjc nynty and fyve years1

A1695/11/182

Sederunt

Lord Chancellour; Earl of Southerland; Earl of Forfar; Lord Yester; Lord Carmichaell; Lord Advocat; Lord Justice Clerk; Lord Anstruther; Mr Fr Montgomery; Laird of Stevensone; Laird of Leyes; Laird of Pollock; Sir Rott Cheisley provost of Edinburgh

1. NRS, PC1/50, 263.

2. NRS, PC1/50, 263.

1. NRS, PC1/50, 263.

2. NRS, PC1/50, 263.